Search

Landslides are common across Canada and they pose hazards to human safety, economic activities, and the environment. Robust risk management strategies are necessary for sustainable development. A slope risk management framework has been adopted by the geotechnical community for approximately four decades allowing a systematic, consistent and transparent framework for managing risks. Implementing this framework is associated with uncertainties embedded in our estimates of risk. This paper presents a brief summary of the sources and categories of uncertainty in geotechnical slope engineering and focuses on two topics: (1) estimates of uncertainty in risk calculations and (2) temporal changes in landslide likelihood as a function of weather and steps towards estimating landslide risk changes with climate change. The paper argues that a quantitative risk assessment should not focus on the final risk calculation, but the overall knowledge gained. This allows comprehensive documentation of sources of uncertainty and how they impact geotechnical and risk assessments. Furthermore, the paper outlines approaches to define quantitative correlations between rock fall occurrences and weather, which can be leveraged to estimate changes in rock fall risk with climate change. The paper corresponds to, and expands on, the 2021 Canadian Geotechnical Colloquium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tailings impoundments are often prone to failure due to various causes related to complex loading conditions. For instance, tailings impoundments can fail during or after a seismic event, mainly because of the liquefaction of loose, cohesionless tailings. To improve the seismic stability of impoundments, the density of the tailings can be increased or waste rock inclusions (WRI) can be added in the impoundment. This paper presents the results of numerical analyses of the impoundments loaded with a variety of ground motions with different frequencies, scaled at two different levels of intensity representative of two mining regions of Eastern Canada. The results show that the conventional impoundments are subjected to medium to high displacements at the end of shaking; these show a high probability of rupture during the earthquake or in the post-seismic phase. Tailings densification can decrease the volume of liquefied tailings and displacements during the seismic phase but does not significantly reduce the probability of post-seismic failure. WRI can slightly reduce the volume of liquefied tailings, depending on the intensity of the motions, but the reinforcement reduces significantly the lateral displacements; impoundments with WRI show even better performances during the post-seismic phase. The use of WRI is deemed a good approach to ensure the seismic stability of tailings impoundments and reduce the risk of seismically induced failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The paper describes load and resistance factor design (LRFD) calibration for the resistance factor used in the Stiffness Method internal stability soil failure limit state for geogrid mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. The Stiffness Method was recently adopted in the current American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials LRFD Bridge Design Specifications in the US, and will appear in the next edition of the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. The paper describes the details of the calibration of the soil failure limit state which is unique to the Stiffness Method. Calibration outcomes include consideration of the concept of level of understanding in the selection of nominal load and resistance values which is unique to LRFD foundation engineering practice in Canada. A practical conclusion from these calculations is that if product line-specific creep test data are available to estimate the reinforcement secant creep stiffness used for design, then a resistance factor of 1.0 is reasonable for US practice. If only minimum average roll value tensile strength data are available, then a value of 0.95 is recommended for US practice. For Canadian practice, the corresponding values for typical level of understanding are 0.90 and 0.85, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The design of shallow foundations typically proceeds by using the load and resistance factor design (LRFD) methodology to avoid various limit states with some probability. This paper looks at the sliding limit state of shallow foundations, and the sliding resistance factors required for the LRFD approach are estimated using reliability analyses of surface strip foundations. Cohesive and frictional soils are separately studied under wind loading conditions. Monte Carlo simulations are used to estimate the sliding failure probability of foundation designs on cohesive soils, and an analytical method is developed for frictional soils. The results indicate the existence of a "worst case" correlation length for cohesive soils, and the sliding resistance factor required to achieve target maximum lifetime failure probabilities is around 0.4–0.65 for moderate soil variability. For frictional soils, the required sliding resistance factor is about 0.5–0.85 for νϕ′ = 0.15. Overall, the sliding resistance factors recommended here agree well with the resistance factors of ϕgu = 0.6 for cohesive soils and ϕgu = 0.8 for frictional soils stipulated by geotechnical LRFD code provisions in Canada. The analyses can be used to estimate the reliability of current designs and can also aid the calibration of geotechnical design codes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An unusually intense atmospheric river affected the southern coastal region of British Columbia in mid-November 2021. Flooding and several ground failures such as landslides and riverbank erosion caused significant damage and interrupted the main transportation corridors, including major highways and railroads, severing land connectivity between Metro Vancouver and the rest of Canada. In this short note, we summarize and describe slope and riverbank ground failures in the Lower Mainland and connecting corridors to the interior such as the Fraser Canyon and the Coquihalla Valley, with focus on those that produced damage on highways. Field observations are discussed in the context of potential future similar disasters in the region due to more frequent extreme climatic events associated with climate change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Location-specific climate datasets are required for the design and evaluation of a number of civil engineering projects. It requires huge effort to compile a multi-year quality-controlled climate dataset. In this paper, a method of generating simulated daily climate variables of interest from readily available climate normal using the general-purpose weather generator SIMETAW is presented. The accuracy of this method is assessed by comparing the climate datasets generated using SIMETAW with the recorded historical climate datasets for nine different sites across Canada with climates ranging from semi-arid to pre-humid. This comparison was done using visual presentations as well as statistical analyses of the two datasets. It was found that the multi-year daily climate datasets generated by SIMETAW using just 12 monthly climate normal values are fairly similar to the recorded historical climate datasets. The usefulness of SIMETAW-generated climate datasets was demonstrated by using them in numerical simulations of three different design problems, namely, infiltration into soils, swelling potential of an expansive soil, and soil cover design. From the results of these numerical simulations, it is concluded that the SIMETAW-generated multi-year daily climate datasets are satisfactory for use in the geotechnical and geoenvironmental problems of the kind simulated herein. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Wind turbines are typically designed based on fatigue and serviceability limit states, but still require an accurate assessment of bearing capacity. Overconsolidated clay deposits in Canada often have a thin layer of crust with a relatively high undrained shear strength developed from weathering, desiccation, and geochemical processes. However, existing design methods only assess the bearing capacity using effective area and inclination factor without consideration of surficial crusts. This paper studies the undrained VHMT (vertical, horizontal, moment, and torsional) failure envelope of circular foundations founded on a surficial crust underlain by a uniform soil with a zero-tension interface condition using finite element analysis. An analytical expression for the VHMT failure envelope is derived. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Investigations of the soil–foundation interaction behaviour of wind turbine foundations and transfer of energy from the wind to the ground have not been reported in Canada. Indeed, very few vibration monitoring studies have been conducted globally around wind farms. It has been found that turbines predominantly produce vibrations related to structural resonances and blade-passing frequencies. Energy is found to be modified with distance and is dominated by surface waves. This paper describes a study of the effect of wind–structure interaction on the behaviour of a turbine foundation and the generation of ground-based vibrations around a working commercial wind turbine in Ontario. The field monitoring system and meteorological instrumentation are described in this paper and the responses of the structure and surrounding ground due to the fluctuating wind-field are discussed. The spectral analysis shows that the higher frequency vibrations attenuate more rapidly than the lower frequency vibrations. The tilted elliptical particle motions are found to be non-Gaussian because of the non-Gaussian wind conditions. The response attenuation with distance indicates that both geometric and material attenuation may dominate the vibration attenuation in the near field and only geometric attenuation occurs in the far field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article focuses on the publisher's policy concerning open access publishing. It states Canadian funding agencies adopted a policy requiring peer-reviewed journal publications that are federally funded to be made available within a year of publication. It mentions methods by which authors can ensure their research is published open access, including through use of an open access repository, in their own institutional repository, or using the OpenArticle publishing option, and talks about charges for OpenArticle.

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Four different seismic methods were used extensively to evaluate the shear wave velocity of soils and rock in the city of Ottawa, Canada, from which the travel-time weighted average shear wave velocity (Vs) from surface to 30 m in depth (Vs30) and the fundamental frequency (F0) were computed. Three main geological or geotechnical units were identified with distinct shear wave velocities: these consist of very loose thick post-glacial fine-grained sands, silts, and clays (Vs <150 m/s, thickness up to 110 m), firm glacial sediments (Vs ~580 m/s, thickness ~3 m), and very firm bedrock (Vs ~1750-3550 m/s). The seismic methods applied were downhole interval Vs measurements at 15 borehole sites, seismic refraction-reflection profile measurements for 686 sites, high-resolution shear wave reflection 'landstreamer' profiling for 25 km in total, and horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) of ambient seismic noise to evaluate the fundamental frequency for ~400 sites. Most of these methods are able to distinguish the very high shear wave impedance of and depth to bedrock. Sparse earthquake recordings show that the soil amplification is large for weak motion when the soil behaves linearly. Quatre méthodes sismiques différentes ont été grandement utilisées afin d'évaluer la vitesse des ondes de cisaillement des sols et roches dans la ville d'Ottawa, Canada, à partir desquelles la vitesse moyenne des ondes de cisaillement pondérée selon le temps de parcours (Vs) de la surface jusqu'à une profondeur de 30 m (Vs30) et la fréquence fondamentale (F0) ont été calculées. Trois unités géologiques ou géotechniques principales ont été identifiées selon des vitesses des ondes de cisaillement distinctes : des sables, silts et argiles post-glaciaires fins, lâches et épais (Vs <150 m/s, jusqu'à 110 m d'épaisseur), des sédiments glaciaires fermes (Vs ~580 m/s, ~3 m d'épaisseur) et du substratum rocheux très ferme (Vs ~1750-3550 m/s). Les méthodes sismiques appliquées étaient des mesures de Vs par intervalle en fond de forage pour 15 sites de forage, des mesures du profil de réfraction-réflexion sismique pour 686 sites, du profilage de la réflexion des ondes de cisaillement à haute résolution « landstreamer » pour 25 km linéaire au total, et le ratio spectral horizontal-vertical (RSHV) du bruit sismique ambiant pour l'évaluation de la fréquence fondamentale sur environ 400 sites. La majorité de ces méthodes sont capables de distinguer l'impédance très élevée aux ondes de cisaillement et la profondeur jusqu'au substratum rocheux. Quelques mesures de séismes montrent que l'amplification du sol est grande pour des mouvements faibles lorsque le sol de comporte de façon linéaire. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Presents a note of appreciation to the people who contributed to the volume 41, 2004 issue of the "Canadian Geotechnical Journal ."

Provides information on the volume of manuscripts sent to the "Canadian Geotechnical Journal" to be reviewed. Affiliation of the journal with the Canadian Geotechnical Society; Reason behind the increase in the workload of Associate Editors of the journal; List of reviewers who contributed to the journal.

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Evaluates the soil properties responsible for the external corrosion of cast iron mains in Toronto, Ontario. Description of the city's water distribution network; Processes associated with corrosion; Classification of soil samples.

Presents the results of the computer modelling component of the cover instrumentation research program initiated by Placer Dome Canada in British Columbia. Objectives of the computer modelling; Functions of a vegetated soil cover; Processes which are controlling water fluxes.

Analyzes field test results obtained by means of the Cambridge self-boring pressuremeter (SBMP) in a sensitive Champlain clay in Louiseville, Quebec. Parameters obtained from the interpretation of SBMP; Details of the use of stress paths; Properties of the soil encountered at the site.

Presents a study that applied a spreadsheet-based, probabilistic slope analysis methodology to evaluate the stability of a section of the Syncrude Tailings Dyke in Fort McMurray, Alberta. Height of the dyke; Performance of the dyke; Techniques used in quantifying the various components of parameter uncertainty.

The hydraulic conductivity of six compacted tills from northern Quebec with different grain-size distributions has been studied in saturated conditions in the laboratory. The results show that compaction conditions play an important role in hydraulic conductivity. When considering the hydraulic conductivities of specimens compacted at degrees of saturation greater than the optimum, there is a good correlation with the content of clay-size particles. This paper provides a good practical tool for evaluating preliminary hydraulic conductivity values of compacted tills from northern Quebec on the basis of their grain-size distribution and compaction conditions.Key words: till, hydraulic conductivity, grain-size distribution, compaction conditions.La conductivité hydraulique de six tills du nord québécois présentant des granulométries différentes a été étudiée en conditions saturées, en laboratoire. Les résultats montrent que les conditions de compactage jouent un rôle important dans la conductivité hydraulique qui en résulte. Lorsque l'on considère les conductivités hydrauliques mesurées sur des échantillons compactés à des degrés de saturation plus élevés que celui à l'optimum, on obtient une bonne corrélation avec le pourcentage de particules de dimensions argileuses. Cet article fournit donc un bon outil pratique pour une évaluation préliminaire de la conductivité hydraulique des tills du nord québécois sur la base de leur granulométrie et des conditions de compactage.Mots clés : till, conductivité hydraulique, granulométrie, conditions de compactage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Eureka River landslide of June 1990, at 50 Mm[sup 3] , is one of the largest historical landslides on the Interior Plains of Canada. It is one of seven large translational landslides to have occurred in the Peace River Lowlands within the last 65 years. Each landslide occurred in Quaternary sediments deposited within a preglacial valley. Each landslide formed a dam. The rupture surface of the Eureka River landslide in preglacial lacustrine sediment, 125 m below the Peace River Lowlands plains, extended beneath the river channel causing the channel to be elevated. The resulting landslide dam was over 20 m high, forming a lake exceeding 8 km in length. The river cut a new channel around the toe of the landslide, abandoning the prelandslide channel. As the new channel is free of armour, incision has been rapid. After 10 years, the dam now stands approximately 5 m high.Key words: landslide, landslide dam, Peace River, Alberta, preglacial valley, geomorphology.Le glissement de la rivière Eureka de juin 1990, ayant un volume de 50 Mm[sup 3] , est un des plus importants glissements historiques des Plaines intérieures du Canada. Il est un des sept grands glissements translationnels à s'être produits dans les Basses-Terres de la rivière Peace au cours des 65 dernières années. Chaque glissement s'est produit dans les sédiments du Quaternaire déposés dans une vallée préglaciaire. Chaque glissement forme un barrage. La surface de rupture du glissement de la rivière Eureka dans le sédiment lacustre préglaciaire, localisée à 125 m sous les plaines des Basses-Terres de la rivière Peace, s'étendait sous le canal de la rivière produisant un soulèvement du canal. Le barrage du glissement résultant avait plus de 20 m de hauteur, formant un lac excédant 8 km de longueur. La rivière s'est frayé un nouveau canal autour du pied du glissement, abandonnant le canal existant avant le glissement. Comme le nouveau canal était libre d'armature, l'entaille a été rapide. Après 10 ans, le barrage mesure maintenant environ 5 m de hauteur.Mots clés : glissement, barrage de glissement, rivière Peace, Alberta, vallée préglaciaire, géomorphologie.[Traduit par la Rédaction] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pays tribute to Anthony Stermac, a geotechnic engineer, who died in Toronto, Ontario in April 2002. Biography of Stermac; Achievements; Accomplishments.

Two large-scale sealing experiments were conducted at Atomic Energy of Canada Limited's Underground Research Laboratory at Lac du Bonnet, Manitoba. The rate of water uptake in densely compacted sand–clay buffer materials proposed for use in a deep geologic repository for spent nuclear fuel was monitored. The buffer–container experiment examined the influence of heat on the performance of a large mass of buffer. Temperatures, water contents, and total and hydraulic pressures within and surrounding the installation were monitored for approximately 2.5 years. Local groundwater pressures increased as a result of rising temperatures. Water uptake and redistribution occurred in the buffer due to drying shrinkage close to the heater and counter-acted swelling due to an increase in water content near the rock–buffer interface. The isothermal test (ITT) allowed natural groundwater uptake from the surrounding rock mass under isothermal conditions. It was monitored for a period of 6.5 years and is the first, and longest running test of its kind yet conducted in the world. During its operation, the ITT (for as yet unconfirmed reasons) experienced a 35% decrease in the rate of water supply relative to that measured prior to experiment installation. This decrease impacts on the time required for saturation to be achieved.Key words: buffer, bentonite, underground research laboratory, instrumentation.Deux essais d'étanchéité à grande échelle ont été conduits au Laboratoire de recherche souterrain de l'Énergie atomique du Canada au lac du Bonnet, Manitoba. On a mesuré la vitesse d'absorption d'eau dans des matériaux tampons formés de sable et argile densément compacts devant être utilisés dans un dépôt géologique profond pour le combustible nucléaire irradié. L'expérience tampon–conteneur a permis d'examiner l'influence de la chaleur sur la performance d'une large masse de tampon. Les températures, teneurs en eau, pressions totales et hydrauliques à l'intérieur et autour de l'installation ont été mesurées durant environ 2,5 années. Les pressions de l'eau souterraine locale ont augmenté à cause de l'augmentation de la température, une absorption et une redistribution se sont produites dans le tampon à cause du séchage et du retrait près des points chauds d'une part, et de l'action inverse du gonflement dû à l'augmentation de la teneur en eau près de l'interface roc–tampon d'autre part. L'essai isothermique a permis l'absorption de l'eau souterraine naturelle venant du massif rocheux dans des conditions isothermiques. Des mesures ont été prises durant une période de 6,5 années, et cet essai est le premier et le plus long essai de ce type à être réalisé jusqu'à ce jour dans le monde. Au cours de son opération, cet essai a subi, pour des raisons encore non confirmées, une diminution de 35 % de la vitesse de son alimentation en eau par rapport à celle mesurée avant la mise en place de l'expérience. Ceci a des impacts sur le temps requis pour atteindre la saturation.Mots clés : tampon, bentonite, Laboratoire de recherche souterrain, instrumentation.[Traduit par la Rédaction] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two large landslides in overconsolidated glaciolacustrine clay and silt, located in river valleys in British Columbia, were found to be quite similar in their main aspects. However, their failure behaviour was very different. One continues to exhibit intermittent, mainly ductile deformations with limited mobility which are typical of compound landslides in stiff clay. The other suddenly developed into an extremely rapid flow slide of 6.4 Mm[sup 3] , damming a large river in the course of a few minutes and projecting a wave onto the opposite bank. The flow slide followed a period of strong infiltration. A comparison of the two cases explains the difference in their failure behaviour. Three possible mechanisms for brittle flow slide formation are proposed, the first based on the undrained brittleness of soil at the rupture surface, the second on the high internal strength of the sliding body, and the third on macroscopic brittleness developed by pre-failure ductile deformation and softening. Both latter mechanisms are facilitated by the presence of nonplastic units in the sliding mass.Key words: overconsolidated clay, silt, landslide, flow slide, brittleness, glaciolacustrine deposits.On a observé que deux grands glissements dans les argiles et silts glacio-marins surconsolidés situés dans des vallées de rivières en Colombie-Britannique étaient tout à fait semblables sous leurs principaux aspects. Cependant, leurs comportements en rupture ont été très différents. L'un continue de montrer des déformations intermittentes principalement ductiles avec une mobilité limitée, ce qui est typique des glissements composés dans les argiles raides. L'autre a soudainement développé une coulée extrêmement rapide de 6,4 Mm[sup 3] , damant une rivière importante en l'espace de quelques minutes et projetant une vague sur la berge opposée. La coulée s'est produite après une période de forte infiltration. Une comparaison des deux cas explique la différence dans leur comportement en rupture. On propose trois mécanismes possibles de formation de coulée: le premier basé sur la fragilité non drainée du sol le long de la surface de rupture, le second sur la forte résistance interne de la masse en mouvement, et le troisième sur la fragilité macroscopique développée par une déformation ductile et un ramollissement avant la rupture. Le deux derniers mécanismes sont facilités par la présence d'unités non plastiques dans la masse en mouvement. Mots clés : argile surconsolidée, silt, glissement, coulée, fragilité, dépôts glacio-marins.[Traduit par la Rédaction] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]