Search

Aim: To evaluate alternative analytical strategies to extend the dynamic range in quantitative LC–MS/MS. Methods & results: Two approaches based on prior or no prior knowledge of expected exposure levels were evaluated. These approaches make use of two analytical strategies, which include the use of more than one injection volume or dilution of sample extract with solvents or solvent mixtures. A total of 16 compounds with varying logP values were classified into polar and nonpolar groups and used in this evaluation. From the two analytical strategies, three workflows were derived. Conclusion: All three workflows were successfully evaluated and resulted in good accuracy (80–120%) for all the compound groups.

Janssen Research & Development, a Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium The role of MS in peptide quantification For quantitative analysis of small-molecule drugs, LC–MS is considered the gold standard. However, focusing on peptide drugs, the majority of peptide development programs still rely on immunoassays for evaluation of exposure of the peptide drug in study samples. The advantages of these assays are the unrivaled sensitivity and the high throughput. Selectivity issues and method development times are, on the other hand, often rate-limiting. LC–MS technology can offer an alternative to improve selectivity and reduce method development time (no reagent preparation needed), but at the expense of lower sensitivity and throughput. Therefore, in our portfolio, for early peptide drug programs, quantitative workflows with LC–MS are preferred to address the short cycle times requested at this stage. In development and also with the aim to evaluate anti-drug antibody response, immunological assays are primarily preferred. An LC–MS assay can then be requested as an orthogonal assay to confirm the selectivity of the immunoassay or to address specific issues. In rare cases, the immunological assay is confronted with considerable challenges and LC–MS(/MS) can be developed faster and with more confidence to support the program.

Background: Peptides represent a growing class of potential drugs. Information on metabolic clearance can be valuable for peptide drug development but different challenges are encountered with the identification of peptide metabolites in comparison to the process used for small-molecule therapeutics. Results: Enfuvirtide was selected as a test compound and dosed intravenously at 2 mg/kg to rats. Plasma samples were collected and analyzed on two different quadrupole-TOF instruments in positive and negative ion modes. Different post-acquisition processing tools were evaluated to identify the metabolites of a peptide drug in the presence of an in vivo matrix. Charge state filtering and ion mobility extraction were applied to reduce the matrix background and combined with more comprehensive software tools generally used for large molecule analyses as well as tools designed for small-molecule metabolite identification work. Conclusion: Both ion mobility spectrometry and charge state filtration proved to be successful in extracting peptide ions and significantly reducing background signals. Both small- and large-molecule software tools contain specific capabilities that could be usefully combined in a single package for peptide metabolite identification.

Background: There is considerable interest in the determination of relative abundances of human metabolites in plasma (and potentially excreta) with reasonable accuracy early on in the drug development process in order to make scientifically sound decisions with regard to the presence of potentially active or toxic disproportionate metabolites. At this point, authentic metabolite standards are generally not available. Results: A new methodology is proposed for the estimation of metabolite concentrations in the absence of authentic standards. A reference sample containing radiolabeled metabolites of interest is produced by incubating the 14C-labeled drug in vitro, and mixed with a sample to be quantitated containing the unlabeled metabolites. The 12C/14C isotope ratio is measured with high-resolution ESI–MS for each metabolite, and used as a basis for quantitation of the cold metabolite based on the concentration of radioactive metabolite, determined from independent analysis of the radioactive sample with LC-radiochemical detection. The 14C-labeled metabolite serves as an isotopically labeled internal standard, which corrects for any variations in injection volume, sample preparation, MS intensity drift, matrix effects and/or saturation of electrospray ionization. The approach was validated by the analysis of solutions containing variable amounts of the analyte with a fixed amount of radioactive standard on a QToF Synapt® G2 MS system. The same methodology was also successfully applied to first-in-human plasma samples analyzed on a LTQ-Orbitrap®. Conclusion: The metabolite abundances obtained by 12C/14C isotope ratio measurements showed suitable accuracy and precision and were very close to those obtained with matrix mixing. The parent drug concentrations also corresponded well with the bioanalytical results obtained with a validated LC–MS/MS method.

Background: With an increased interest in peptides and proteins as potential new drug candidates, new approaches for sensitive and selective quantitative analysis are required. LC–MS/MS analysis provides a good alternative to immunoassays with reduced method development times and increased specificity. Results: We have evaluated two state-of-the-art triple quadrupole and high-resolution TOF mass spectrometers with respect to their performance for quantification of six peptides (glufibrinopeptide B, somatostatin, enfuvirtide, TRI1144, C34 and exenatide). The peptides were spiked into protein-precipitated plasma supernatant. Triple quadrupole quantification was performed in SRM mode, and in high-resolution, MS narrow-width extracted chromatograms were generated for quantification. Specificity, accuracy, reproducibility and robustness were found to be comparable between the two instruments. The triple quadrupole instrument is still the most sensitive instrument for quantification of peptides with a median factor of about four-times higher sensitivity (based on LLOQ evaluation). Conclusion: Based on sensitivity, the newest generation triple quadrupole MS systems are still the preferred technology for quantification of peptides. Since the sensitivity difference between triple quadrupole instruments and the new-generation high-resolution TOF-MS instruments is minor, the latter offer a useful alternative whenever additional selectivity is preferred or the use of a generic approach not requiring method optimization is advantageous.