1. Are 3 sentinel nodes sufficient?
- Author
-
Chagpar AB, Scoggins CR, Martin RC 2nd, Carlson DJ, Laidley AL, El-Eid SE, McGlothin TQ, and McMasters KM
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms surgery, Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast surgery, Carcinoma, Lobular surgery, False Negative Reactions, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast pathology, Carcinoma, Lobular pathology, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy methods
- Abstract
Hypothesis: It has recently been proposed that only 3 sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are required for an adequate SLN biopsy. Others have advocated removing all nodes that are blue, hot, at the end of a blue lymphatic channel, or palpably suspicious or that have radioactive counts of 10% or greater of the most radioactive SLN. Our objective was to determine the false-negative rate (FNR) associated with limiting SLN biopsy to 3 nodes., Design: Multicenter prospective study., Setting: Both academic and private practice., Patients: A total of 4131 patients underwent SLN biopsy followed by completion axillary node dissection., Main Outcome Measure: The FNR associated with 3-node SLN biopsy., Results: Of the 4131 patients in this study, an SLN was identified in 3882 (94.0%). The median number of SLNs identified was 2; more than 3 SLNs were removed in 738 patients (17.9%). Of the patients in whom a SLN was identified, 1358 (35.0%) were node positive. The overall FNR in this study was 7.7%. In 89.7% of node-positive patients, a positive SLN was found in the first 3 SLNs removed. If SLN biopsy had been limited to the first 3 nodes, the FNR would be 10.3% (P = .005 compared with removing >3 SLNs). The FNR increased with the strategy of limiting SLN biopsy to fewer SLNs (P<.001)., Conclusion: Removing only 3 SLNs cannot be recommended, because it is associated with a substantially increased FNR.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF