Back to Search Start Over

Are 3 sentinel nodes sufficient?

Authors :
Chagpar AB
Scoggins CR
Martin RC 2nd
Carlson DJ
Laidley AL
El-Eid SE
McGlothin TQ
McMasters KM
Source :
Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960) [Arch Surg] 2007 May; Vol. 142 (5), pp. 456-9; discussion 459-60.
Publication Year :
2007

Abstract

Hypothesis: It has recently been proposed that only 3 sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are required for an adequate SLN biopsy. Others have advocated removing all nodes that are blue, hot, at the end of a blue lymphatic channel, or palpably suspicious or that have radioactive counts of 10% or greater of the most radioactive SLN. Our objective was to determine the false-negative rate (FNR) associated with limiting SLN biopsy to 3 nodes.<br />Design: Multicenter prospective study.<br />Setting: Both academic and private practice.<br />Patients: A total of 4131 patients underwent SLN biopsy followed by completion axillary node dissection.<br />Main Outcome Measure: The FNR associated with 3-node SLN biopsy.<br />Results: Of the 4131 patients in this study, an SLN was identified in 3882 (94.0%). The median number of SLNs identified was 2; more than 3 SLNs were removed in 738 patients (17.9%). Of the patients in whom a SLN was identified, 1358 (35.0%) were node positive. The overall FNR in this study was 7.7%. In 89.7% of node-positive patients, a positive SLN was found in the first 3 SLNs removed. If SLN biopsy had been limited to the first 3 nodes, the FNR would be 10.3% (P = .005 compared with removing >3 SLNs). The FNR increased with the strategy of limiting SLN biopsy to fewer SLNs (P<.001).<br />Conclusion: Removing only 3 SLNs cannot be recommended, because it is associated with a substantially increased FNR.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0004-0010
Volume :
142
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
17515487
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.142.5.456