Search

The evolution of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still hard to predict, even after several months of dealing with the pandemic.To develop and validate a score to predict outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.All consecutive adults hospitalized for COVID-19 from February to April 2020 were included in a nationwide observational study. Primary composite outcome was transfer to an intensive care unit from an emergency department or conventional ward, or in-hospital death. A score that estimates the risk of experiencing the primary outcome was constructed from a derivation cohort using stacked LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator), and was tested in a validation cohort.Among 2873 patients analysed (57.9% men; 66.6±17.0 years), the primary outcome occurred in 838 (29.2%) patients: 551 (19.2%) were transferred to an intensive care unit; and 287 (10.0%) died in-hospital without transfer to an intensive care unit. Using stacked LASSO, we identified 11 variables independently associated with the primary outcome in multivariable analysis in the derivation cohort (n=2313), including demographics (sex), triage vitals (body temperature, dyspnoea, respiratory rate, fraction of inspired oxygen, blood oxygen saturation) and biological variables (pH, platelets, C-reactive protein, aspartate aminotransferase, estimated glomerular filtration rate). The Critical COVID-19 France (CCF) risk score was then developed, and displayed accurate calibration and discrimination in the derivation cohort, with C-statistics of 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.75-0.80). The CCF risk score performed significantly better (i.e. higher C-statistics) than the usual critical care risk scores.The CCF risk score was built using data collected routinely at hospital admission to predict outcomes in patients with COVID-19. This score holds promise to improve early triage of patients and allocation of healthcare resources.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a public health crisis. Only limited data are available on the characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in France. Aims: To investigate the characteristics, cardiovascular complications and outcomes of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in France. Methods: The Critical COVID-19 France (CCF) study is a French nationwide study including all consecutive adults with a diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) infection hospitalized in 24 centres between 26 February and 20 April 2020. Patients admitted directly to intensive care were excluded. Clinical, biological and imaging parameters were systematically collected at hospital admission. The primary outcome was in-hospital death. Results: Of 2878 patients included (mean ± SD age 66.6 ± 17.0 years, 57.8% men), 360 (12.5%) died in the hospital setting, of which 7 (20.7%) were transferred to intensive care before death. The majority of patients had at least one (72.6%) or two (41.6%) cardiovascular risk factors, mostly hypertension (50.8%), obesity (30.3%), dyslipidaemia (28.0%) and diabetes (23.7%). In multivariable analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03−1.06; P < 0.001), male sex (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.11−2.57; P = 0.01), diabetes (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.12−2.63; P = 0.01), chronic kidney failure (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.02−2.41; P = 0.04), elevated troponin (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.11−2.49; P = 0.01), elevated B-type natriuretic peptide or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.0004−2.86; P = 0.049) and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score ≥ 2 (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.12−2.60; P = 0.01) were independently associated with in-hospital death. Conclusions: In this large nationwide cohort of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in France, cardiovascular comorbidities and risk factors were associated with a substantial morbi-mortality burden.

Background. – Although women account for up to half of patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), no specific data have been reported in this population. Aims. − To assess the burden and impact of cardiovascular comorbidities in women with COVID-19. Methods. − All consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19 across 24 hospitals from 26 February to 20 April 2020 were included. The primary composite outcome was transfer to an intensive care unit or in-hospital death. Results. − Among 2878 patients, 1212 (42.1%) were women. Women were older (68.3 ± 18.0 vs 65.4 ± 16.0 years; P < 0.001), but had less prevalent cardiovascular comorbidities than men. Among women, 276 (22.8%) experienced the primary outcome, including 161 (13.3%) transfers to an intensive care unit and 115 (9.5%) deaths without transfer to intensive care unit. The rate of in-hospital death or transfer to an intensive care unit was lower in women versus men (crude hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53–0.72). Age (adjusted HR 1.05 per 5-year increase, 95% CI 1.01–1.10), body mass index (adjusted HR 1.06 per 2-unit increase, 95% CI 1.02–1.10), chronic kidney disease (adjusted HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.11–2.22) and heart failure (adjusted HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.04–2.22) were independently associated with the primary outcome in women. Elevated B-type natriuretic peptide/N-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide (adjusted HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.70–3.44) and troponin (adjusted HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.39–2.88) concentrations at admission were also associated with the primary outcome, even in women free of previous coronary artery disease or heart failure. Conclusions. – Although female sex was associated with a lower risk of transfer to an intensive care unit or in-hospital death, COVID-19 remained associated with considerable morbimortality in women, especially in those with cardiovascular diseases.

With the growing adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) population, the number of catheter ablation procedures is expected to dramatically increase. Data reporting experience and evolution of catheter ablation in patients with ACHD, over a significant period of time, remain scarce.We aimed to describe temporal trends in volume and outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with ACHD.This was a retrospective observational study including all consecutive patients with ACHD undergoing attempted catheter ablation in a large tertiary referral centre over a 15-year period. Acute procedural success rate and freedom from recurrence at 12 and 24 months were analysed.From November 2004 to November 2019, 302 catheter ablations were performed in 221 patients with ACHD (mean age 43.6±15.0 years; 58.9% male sex). The annual number of catheter ablations increased progressively from four to 60 cases per year (P0.001). Intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia/focal atrial tachycardia was the most common arrhythmia (n=217, 71.9%). Over the study period, acute procedural success rate increased from 45.0% to 93.4% (P0.001). Use of irrigated catheters (odds ratio [OR] 4.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.86-8.55), a three-dimensional mapping system (OR 3.70, 95% CI 1.72-7.74), contact force catheters (OR 3.60, 95% CI 1.81-7.38) and high-density mapping (OR 3.69, 95% CI 1.82-8.14) were associated with acute procedural success. The rate of freedom from any recurrence at 12 months increased from 29.4% to 66.2% (P=0.001). Seven (2.3%) non-fatal complications occurred.The number of catheter ablation procedures in patients with ACHD has increased considerably over the past 15 years. Growing experience and advances in ablative technologies appear to be associated with a significant improvement in acute and mid-term outcomes.