1. SAT0331 CHIPPING AWAY AT POLYMYOSITIS: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW AT A TERTIARY MYOSITIS CENTRE
- Author
-
Jesús Loarce-Martos, Matthew J.S. Parker, Hector Chinoy, James B. Lilleker, Neil McHugh, A.L. Herrick, and Zoe E Betteridge
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Muscle biopsy ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Immunology ,medicine.disease ,Connective tissue disease ,Polymyositis ,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology ,Rheumatology ,Internal medicine ,Cohort ,medicine ,Immunology and Allergy ,Inclusion body myositis ,medicine.symptom ,Myopathy ,business ,Rheumatism ,Myositis - Abstract
Background:Since first described, our understanding of polymyositis (PM) has evolved substantially. Patients previously diagnosed with PM may now be better described as having an alternative diagnosis, including immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), connective tissue disease overlap myositis (CTD-OM), anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS) or inclusion body myositis (IBM).Objectives:To apply the current understanding of IIM subtypes to retrospectively review the diagnosis of patients classified as PM at our centre.Methods:We reviewed a cohort of 255 patients from a UK tertiary myositis clinic, with 37 patients classified as PM according to the EULAR/ACR IIM criteria and expert opinion (1). Consensus decisions made as to whether reclassification as an alternative IIM subtype would be appropriate in each case.Results:Thirty-seven patients with PM diagnosis according to EULAR/ACR IIM criteria and expert opinion were included in the analysis. Twenty-six patients (26/37, 68.4%) were female. The mean age at diagnosis was 57 years (SD 16.25) and mean follow up was 5.2 years (SD 4.8).After consensus discussions, ten patients (27%) retained classification as PM, representing 3.9% (10/255) of the original cohort of 255 patients. The remaining 27 were reclassified as follows: 7 CTD-OM (18.9%), 6 IMNM (16.2%), 6 unspecified myopathy (16.2%), 2 DM (5.4%), 1 IBM (2.7%), and 1 non-inflammatory myopathy (2.7%, myofibrillar myopathy). Four patients (10%) had insufficient data available to allow for a defined diagnosis.Of the 10 patients retaining classification as PM, 7 (70%) were female and mean age at diagnosis was 58.9 years. Clinical characteristics are represented in table 1. Mean CK at diagnosis was 2321 IU/L. Four patients (40%) were ANA positive, 8 patients (80%) were tested for the complete myositis antibody panel and 8 (80%) were specifically tested for the presence of HMGCR antibodies (figure 1). EMG revealed a myopathic pattern in 6/7 patients tested, while MRI demonstrated muscle oedema compatible with myositis in 3/5 of the patients that were tested. A complete muscle biopsy report was available in 8/10 PM-classified patients (80%), diffuse HLA-1 upregulation was present in 5 patients (50%), endomysial inflammatory infiltrates in 5 (50%) and perimysial infiltrates (in conjunction with endomysial infiltrates) in 3 (30%). No other specific features were found.Table 1.Clinical features.PM (n=10)CTD-OM (n=7)IMNM (n=6)All (n=37)Pyrexia0001 (2.7 %)Weight loss2 (20%)2 (28.6%)2 (33.3%)6 (16.2 %)Cutaneous rash01 (14.3%)02 (5.4 %)Mechanic’s hands1 (10%)2 (28.6%)04 (10.8 %)Sclerodactyly01 (14.3%)01 (2.7 %)Periungual erythema01 (14.3%)02 (5.3 %)Raynaud’s05 (71.4%)08 (21.6 %)Arthralgia05 (71.4%)08 (21.6 %)Arthritis02 (28.6%)05 (13.5 %)Muscle weakness10 (100%)7 (100%)6 (100%)36 (97.2%)Myalgia3 (30%)5 (71.4%)3 (50%)20 (54 %)Dysphagia3 (30%)5 (71.4%)1 (16.7%)13 (35.1 %)Interstitial lung disease (ILD)03 (42.9%)04 (10.5 %)Malignancy1 (9.1%)02 (33.3%)3 (8.1%)Conclusion:This study confirms that PM can now be considered a rare IIM subtype. A thorough examination, complete myositis antibody panel including HMGCR testing and careful interpretation of the biopsy results is recommended to accurately classify these patients.References:[1]Parker MJS, Oldroyd A, Roberts ME, Lilleker JB, Betteridge ZE, McHugh NJ, et al. The performance of the European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology idiopathic inflammatory myopathies classification criteria in an expert-defined 10 year incident cohort. Rheumatol (United Kingdom). 2019 Mar 1;58(3):468–75Disclosure of Interests:None declared
- Published
- 2020