Search

Knowledge of the proportion of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) use among men who have sex with men (MSM) and the specific gaps in PrEP use can stimulate enhanced focus on HIV prevention policies and programs. To summarize the proportion of PrEP use and explore the temporal trend in the proportion of PrEP use and factors associated with PrEP use among MSM on a global scale, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and APA PsycINFO for studies reporting on the use of HIV PrEP among MSM before April 2022. Freeman-Tukey double arc-sine transformation and random-effects models were used to pool estimates. A total of 147 articles involving 395,218 MSM were included. The pooled proportions of PrEP use among MSM and PrEP-eligible MSM were 11.23% [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.71–12.84] and 16.04% (95% CI: 11.99–23.36), respectively. The proportion of PrEP use varied among countries with different support policies. β regressions with the logit link showed that the proportion of PrEP use has increased in recent years. Interrupted time series analyses further supported that the approval of PrEP use would decrease the number of new HIV diagnoses among MSM. The main factors associated with PrEP use include health insurance, having a regular medical provider, prior HIV testing, past use of PrEP or Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, social networks, and stigma. Although the proportion of PrEP use among MSM has remained low, it has increased in recent years. More studies are needed to explore the factors associated with PrEP use, especially for PrEP-eligible MSM in low- and middle-income countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Autonomy support is a concept that is derived from self-determination theory. Autonomy refers to the freedom to act as one chooses. The current study aimed to examine if autonomy support was associated with dried blood spot validated pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence, and whether the association was mediated by PrEP adherence goal setting and progress toward PrEP adherence goals. Our sample was drawn from Black men who have sex with men (MSM) from across three cities (Chapel Hill, NC; Los Angeles, CA; and Washington, DC) in the United States between February 2013 and September 2014. We used logistic regression to evaluate associations between study variables and path analysis to test mediation effects. Participants were, on average, 28 [standard deviation (SD) = 1.12] years old and 25% were unemployed. We found that MSM who experienced high autonomy support were more likely to adhere to PrEP [odds ratio (OR) = 1.17; 95% confidence interval: 1.00–1.38]. MSM who set PrEP adherence goals were more likely to adhere to PrEP. Moreover, MSM who reported making progress toward their goals were also more likely to adhere to PrEP. Finally, client perception of coordination quality enhanced the magnitude of the association between goal setting and goal progress and the effect size of goal progress on PrEP adherence. Autonomy support, goal setting, goal monitoring/evaluation, and care coordination quality influenced PrEP adherence among Black MSM. Our findings indicate that while it is important to set goals for PrEP adherence, goal setting may need to be accompanied by progress monitoring to achieve the maximal effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The COVID-19 pandemic has created additional barriers to accessing sexual health services among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in China. Yet, little is known about the frequency of HIV testing and how GBMSM get tested during the pandemic. We surveyed an online sample of GBMSM recruited on a gay networking app in China. Among 956 sexually active, 70.1% had received an HIV test in the past 6 months. Among these, 61.0% reported having undergone HIV self-testing (HIVST). Young GBMSM aged 18–24 years old were more likely to receive a recent HIV test, and the number of sexual partners was associated with recent HIV testing [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03–1.20]. Among those who had a recent HIV test, young GBMSM and those who had anal sex with both main partner and casual partners were more likely to utilize HIVST (AOR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.16–2.84), as well as GBMSM who did not use a condom the last time engaged in anal sex (AOR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.06–2.34). Among GBMSM never tested for HIV, a majority perceived low risk of HIV, while some suggested that they did not know where to get tested or they were scared of finding out they had HIV. HIVST has the potential to fill the gap in HIV testing among Chinese GBMSM, and future HIV testing programs should emphasize HIV education, accurate information dissertation, and timely point-to-care services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article offers information on Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) awareness and use among men who have sex with men only (MSMO) and men who have sex with both men and women (MSMW). Topics discussed include bivariate analyses to identify differences in demographic and behavioral characteristics between MSMO and MSMW; disparities between MSMW and MSMO in PrEP awareness; and risk factors among MSMW in mitigating disparities, promoting prevention strategies, and reducing HIV risk in population.

HIV nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (nPEP) has been prescribed to men who have sex with men (MSM) for decades, but the global situation of nPEP implementation among this population remains unclear. To understand nPEP awareness, uptake, and factors associated with uptake among MSM, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies reporting nPEP implementation among MSM published before May 19, 2019. We estimated pooled rates and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of awareness, uptake using a random-effects model. We identified 74 studies: 3 studies (4.1%) from upper-middle-income regions and 71 (95.9%) from high-income regions. The pooled rate of nPEP awareness and uptake was 51.6% (95% CI 40.6–62.5%) and 6.0% (5.0–7.1%), respectively. Pooled uptake rate was higher in upper-middle-income regions [8.9% (7.8–10.0%)] than in high-income regions [5.8% (4.8–6.9%)]. Unprotected anal sex was the most common exposure (range: 55.0–98.6%, median: 62.9%). Pooled completion of nPEP was 86.9% (79.5–92.8%). Of 19,546 MSM prescribed nPEP, 500 HIV seroconversions (2.6%) were observed. Having risky sexual behaviors and history of sexually transmitted infections were associated with higher nPEP uptake, whereas insufficient knowledge, underestimated risk of exposure to HIV, lack of accessibility, and social stigma might hinder nPEP uptake. Awareness and uptake of nPEP among MSM worldwide are low. Further efforts are needed to combat barriers to access nPEP, including improving accessibility and reducing stigma. Seroconversions post-nPEP uptake suggest that joint prevention precautions aside from nPEP are needed for high-risk MSM. More evidence from low-income and middle-income regions is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Next-generation forms of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) currently in development, including long-acting injectables (LAIs), rectal microbicides (RMs), antibody infusions (AIs), and subdermal implants (SIs), may address barriers to daily oral PrEP uptake and adherence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate barriers to oral PrEP, preferences for next-generation PrEP modalities, sociodemographic characteristics and sexual behaviors associated with preferences, and reasons for wanting or not wanting each formulation among a sample of men who have sex with men (MSM). We administered a cross-sectional survey to a diverse sample of MSM currently taking oral PrEP (n = 108) at two sexually transmitted disease clinics. We used logistic multivariate analyses to explore preferences, relative to oral PrEP, for each formulation across sociodemographic and sexual behaviors. The most commonly endorsed barriers were finding a PrEP provider and making appointments to get PrEP. Participants were most likely to prefer the SI (45%), followed by the LAI (31%), pill (21%), RM (1%), and AI (1%). Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino MSM were more likely to prefer the LAI over daily oral PrEP (odds ratio: 2.45, 95% confidence interval: 0.86–6.89), and sexual behaviors were most commonly associated with preference for the SI. Top reasons for wanting or not wanting each formulation were most commonly related to perceived ease of use. These findings demonstrate variations in preferences for next-generation PrEP modalities, highlighting a need to ensure comprehensive access to all formulations once they become available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Increasing rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the United States among men who have sex with men (MSM) have raised concerns that pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been associated with higher engagement in condomless anal intercourse (CAI). While partnership characteristics have previously been found to influence condom use, the extent to which PrEP use may modify their effect on CAI remains unknown. A secondary analysis of 535 sexual partnerships from a cross-sectional study in San Francisco was conducted to evaluate interactions between PrEP use and partnership characteristics on CAI. Bivariate and multivariate generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression models were used to estimate relative measures of association, adjusted for confounding by seroconcordance and partnership type, as well as account for repeated partnerships per respondent. Partnerships where both partners used biomedical prevention had significantly greater odds of CAI [odds ratio (OR) = 5.19, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.27–11.9] compared to those where only one partner used biomedical prevention, while those where neither partner used biomedical prevention had significantly lower odds of CAI (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.40–0.93). There was no significant association between meeting place (online vs. offline) and sexual risk taking (OR = 1.03, p = 0.894). Having one partner disclose their HIV status (compared to neither partner having disclosed) was associated with significantly higher odds of CAI among partnerships of PrEP-using MSM [adjusted OR (aOR) = 5.28, 95% CI: 1.91–14.61], while the association was not significant among the partnerships of non-PrEP-using MSM (aOR = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.75–2.21). Differences in condom use among MSM using PrEP may not be well explained by differences in the effect of partnership characteristics. MSM using PrEP appear to commonly practice biomedical matching and high engagement in CAI with other biomedical prevention users, which could indicate relatively concentrated sexual networks and partly explain their disproportionate risk for STIs. Future studies should further investigate biomedical matching to develop interventions that further promote the sexual health of those using PrEP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the need of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) scale-up to link HIV-uninfected individuals to access to care. It discusses the reasons for its failure being lack insurance services in the pilot program The Washington University in St. Louis (WUSTL) Division of Infectious Diseases (ID) PrEP Program for individuals in the community.

Many men who have sex with men (MSM) do not disclose their same sex behaviors to healthcare providers (HCPs). We used a series of logistic regression models to explore a conceptual framework that first identified predictors of disclosure to HCPs among young MSM (YMSM), and subsequently examined young men's disclosure of male-male sexual behaviors to HCPs as a mediator between sociodemographic and behavioral factors and three distinct health outcomes [HIV testing, sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing, and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination]. We determined the predictors of disclosure to HCPs among YMSM and examined the relationship between disclosure and the receipt of appropriate healthcare services. Data were collected online through a US national sample of 1750 YMSM (ages 18-29 years) using a social and sexual networking website for MSM. Sexual history, STI/HIV screening history, sexual health, and patient-provider communication were analyzed in the logistic regression models. Participants were predominantly white (75.2%) and gay/homosexual (76.7%) with at least some college education (82.7%). Young men's disclosure of male-male sexual behaviors to HCPs was associated with the receipt of all healthcare outcomes in our model. Disclosure was a stronger mediator in HPV vaccination than in HIV and STI testing. Disclosure to non-HCP friends and family, HCP visit in the past year, and previous STI diagnosis were the strongest predictors of disclosure. Young men's disclosure of male-male sexual behaviors to HCPs is integral to the receipt of appropriate healthcare services among YMSM. HPV vaccination is more dependent on provider-level interaction with patients than HIV/STI testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]