Search

The capacity for macrophages to polarize into distinct functional activation states (e.g., M1, M2) is critical to tune an inflammatory response to the relevant infection or injury. Alternative or M2 polarization of macrophages is most often achieved in vitroin response to IL-4/IL-13 and results in the transcriptional up-regulation of a constellation of characteristic M2 marker genes. In vivo, additional signals from the inflammatory milieu can further increase or decrease M2 marker expression. Particularly, activation of cAMP-generating G protein-coupled receptors is reported to increase M2 markers, but whether this is strictly dependent upon cAMP production is unclear. We report herein that increased cAMP alone can increase IL-4-dependent M2 marker expression through a PKA/C/EBPβ/CREB dependent pathway in murine macrophages.

The unique cell biology of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) allows it to initiate two signal-transduction cascades: a signal dependent on the adaptors TIRAP (Mal) and MyD88 that begins at the cell surface and regulates proinflammatory cytokines, and a signal dependent on the adaptors TRAM and TRIF that begins in the endosomes and drives the production of type I interferons. Negative feedback circuits to limit TLR4 signals from both locations are necessary to balance the inflammatory response. We describe a negative feedback loop driven by autocrine–paracrine prostaglandin E2(PGE2) and the PGE2receptor EP4 that restricted TRIF-dependent signals and the induction of interferon-β through the regulation of TLR4 trafficking. Inhibition of PGE2production or antagonism of EP4 increased the rate at which TLR4 translocated to endosomes and amplified TRIF-dependent activation of the transcription factor IRF3 and caspase-8. This PGE2-driven mechanism restricted TLR4–TRIF signaling in vitro after infection of macrophages by the Gram-negative pathogens Escherichia colior Citrobacter rodentiumand protected mice against mortality induced by Salmonella enteritidisserovar Typhimurium. Thus, PGE2restricted TLR4–TRIF signaling specifically in response to lipopolysaccharide.

The innate inflammatory response to Francisella tularensis(Ft) in macrophages is significantly governed by the expression of type I interferon (IFN). Previously, the proteolytic processing and maturation of pro-IL-1β protein was shown to depend upon type I IFN expression. We show in this report that paracrine type I IFN can profoundly enhance innate recognition and TLR-dependent transcriptional responses to Ftinfection upstream of its role in inflammasome regulation in both primary human monocyte-derived macrophages and primary murine peritoneal macrophages but not murine bone marrow-derived macrophages. This type I IFN-enhanced response is synergistic with TLR2 transcriptional responses, partially TLR2-independent, but strictly MyD88-dependent.

ABSTRACTTick saliva contains a number of effector molecules that inhibit host immunity and facilitate pathogen transmission. How tick proteins regulate immune signaling, however, is incompletely understood. Here, we describe that loop 2 of sialostatin L2, an anti-inflammatory tick protein, binds to annexin A2 and impairs the formation of the NLRC4 inflammasome during infection with the rickettsial agent Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Macrophages deficient in annexin A2 secreted significantly smaller amounts of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and IL-18 and had a defect in NLRC4 inflammasome oligomerization and caspase-1 activation. Accordingly, Annexin a2-deficient mice were more susceptible to A. phagocytophiluminfection and showed splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, and monocytopenia. Providing translational support to our findings, better binding of annexin A2 to sialostatin L2 in sera from 21 out of 23 infected patients than in sera from control individuals was also demonstrated. Overall, we establish a unique mode of inflammasome evasion by a pathogen, centered on a blood-feeding arthropod.

TLRs activate immune responses by sensing microbial structures such as bacterial LPS, viral RNA, and endogenous “danger” molecules released by damaged host cells. MyD88 is an adapter protein that mediates signal transduction for most TLRs and leads to activation of NF‐κB and MAPKs and production of proinflammatory cytokines. TLR4‐mediated signaling also leads to rapid activation of PI3K, one of a family of kinases involved in regulation of cell growth, apoptosis, and motility. LPS stimulates phosphorylation of Akt, a downstream target of PI3K, in wild‐type (WT) mouse macrophages. LPS‐induced phosphorylation of Akt serine 473 was blunted in MyD88−/−macrophages and was completely TLR4‐dependent. MyD88 and p85 were shown previously to co‐immunoprecipitate, and a YXXM motif within the Toll‐IL‐1 resistance (TIR) domain of MyD88 was suggested to be important for this interaction. To test this hypothesis, we compared expressed MyD88 variants with mutations within the YXXM motif or lacking the TIR domain or death domain and measured their capacities to bind PI3K p85, MyD88, and TLR4 by co‐immunoprecipitation analyses. The YXXM → YXXA mutant MyD88 bound more strongly to p85, TLR4, and WT MyD88 than the other variants, yet was significantly less active than WT MyD88, suggesting that sustained interaction of MyD88/PI3K with the TLR4 intracellular “signaling platform” negatively regulates signaling. We propose a hypothetical model in which sustained PI3K activity at the membrane limits the availability of the PI3K substrate, thereby negatively regulating signaling.

Two cosegregating single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in human TLR4, an A896G transition at SNP rs4986790 (D299G) and a C1196T transition at SNP rs4986791 (T399I), have been associated with LPS hyporesponsiveness and differential susceptibility to many infectious or inflammatory diseases. However, many studies failed to confirm these associations, and transfection experiments resulted in conflicting conclusions about the impact of these SNPs on TLR4 signaling. Using advanced protein modeling from crystallographic data of human and murine TLR4, we identified homologous substitutions of these SNPs in murine Tlr4, engineered a knock-in strain expressing the D298G and N397I TLR4 SNPs homozygously, and characterized in vivo and in vitro responses to TLR4 ligands and infections in which TLR4 is implicated. Our data provide new insights into cellular and molecular mechanisms by which these SNPs decrease the TLR4 signaling efficiency and offer an experimental approach to confirm or refute human data possibly confounded by variables unrelated to the direct effects of the SNPs on TLR4 functionality.

Enhanced susceptibility to 2° bacterial infections following infection with influenza virus is a global health concern that accounts for many hospitalizations and deaths, particularly during pandemics. The complexity of the impaired host immune response during 2° bacterial infection has been widely studied. Both type I IFN and neutrophil dysfunction through decreased chemokine production have been implicated as mechanisms underlying enhanced susceptibility to 2° bacterial infections. Our findings support the conclusion that selective suppression of CXCL1/CXCL2 represents an IFN-β-mediated “training” of the macrophage transcriptional response to TLR2 agonists and that blocking of TLR4 therapeutically with Eritoran after influenza virus infection reverses this suppression by blunting influenza-induced IFN-β.

A notable proportion of Salmonella-associated gastroenteritis in the United States is attributed to Salmonella entericaserovar Typhimurium. We have previously shown that live-attenuated S.

ABSTRACTOverwhelming inflammation triggered by systemic infection in bacterial sepsis contributes to the pathology of this condition. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are important in early septic inflammation. As a safeguard, the innate immune system has evolved to counter excessive inflammation through the induction of “tolerance.” In endotoxin tolerance, TLR signaling is inhibited and/or attenuated by multiple mechanisms that mitigate the ability of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to activate critical kinases through TLR4. Here, we describe a novel mechanism. Protein kinase R (PKR), a kinase normally activated by a subset of TLRs, is rendered unresponsive to LPS in endotoxin-tolerized cells. In its naive state, PKR is subject to K63-linked ubiquitination (Ub), followed by K48-linked Ub, in response to LPS. In tolerance, the kinetics of this differential Ub is altered, resulting in a predominance of K48-linked chains, concomitant with a loss of PKR activation. These findings provide a novel mechanism by which a TLR-responsive kinase may be rendered inactive in tolerance.IMPORTANCE“Endotoxin tolerance” is a period of transient unresponsiveness to the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) outer membrane component of Gram-negative bacteria that is induced by prior exposure to LPS through Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). The loss of LPS-inducible cytokine production by macrophages from patients who have experienced Gram-negative sepsis is well documented, and the increased susceptibility of such patients to reinfection has been attributed to the development of endotoxin tolerance. Multiple mechanisms have been proffered to account for this attenuated response. Using the LPS-responsive kinase protein kinase R (PKR), we have identified differential K48 versus K63 ubiquitination as an additional molecular mechanism by which signal-transducing elements may be inactivated in a state of endotoxin tolerance. This work is highly significant because it links recent discoveries concerning the important role of ubiquitination of signaling molecules in regulating TLR signaling with the loss of LPS responsiveness in tolerance.