1. Superior bowel preparation quality for colonoscopy with 1L-PEG compared to 2L-PEG and picosulphate: Data from a large real-world retrospective outpatient cohort.
- Author
-
Scalvini, Davide, Lenti, Marco Vincenzo, Maimaris, Stiliano, Lusetti, Francesca, Alimenti, Eleonora, Fazzino, Erica, Mauro, Aurelio, Mazza, Stefano, Agazzi, Simona, Strada, Elena, Rovedatti, Laura, Bardone, Marco, Pozzi, Lodovica, Schiepatti, Annalisa, Di Sabatino, Antonio, Biagi, Federico, and Anderloni, Andrea
- Abstract
Several randomized clinical trials comparing different bowel preparations (BP) have shown similar efficacy; however, there is a lack of real-world studies on this topic. This study aims to identify the most effective BP regimen in a real-world setting and any predictors of inadequate BP. A retrospective single-center study was conducted over 14 months at an academic hospital including outpatient colonoscopies in which adult patients did not teach on how to perform BP before colonoscopy. Colonoscopies with 1L-PEG, 2L-PEG and picosulphate mixtures were considered. A multivariable analysis for factors associated to poor BP was fitted. Overall, 1779 patients (51 %F, 60±14) years were included. The 1L-PEG regimen provided a higher rate of BP adequacy at multivariate analysis (adjusted OR 2.30, 95 %CI 1.67–3.16, p < 0.001) and was associated with higher median Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score (p < 0.001), higher rate of right-colon cleansing (p < 0.001) and exam completion (p = 0.04). Furthermore, we identified male sex, history of constipation, active smoking, previous pelvic surgery, concomitant psychiatric/neurological or chronic kidney diseases as predictors of inadequate BP. This is the largest real-world study comparing 1L-PEG to other BP regimens. Our results suggest 1L-PEG provides better BP in a non-controlled setting, improving clinical practice quality and minimizing the need for repeated colonoscopies and saving healthcare resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF