Search

• The ATHENA-HF clinical trial did not find additional decongestive benefit of spironolactone 100 mg/day for 96 hours in acute heart failure. • We performed a post hoc analysis of whether this spironolactone dosage had any pharmacodynamic effects. • We found that increased spironolactone dosing limited potassium losses in acute heart failure treatment and reduced the need for potassium replacement. • However, patients with acute heart failure and lower serum potassium levels did not experience greater decongestion with this intervention. The ATHENA-HF (Aldosterone Targeted Neurohormonal Combined with Natriuresis Therapy in Heart Failure) clinical trial found no improvements in natriuretic peptide levels or clinical congestion when spironolactone 100 mg/day for 96 hours was used in addition to usual treatment for acute heart failure. We performed a post hoc analysis of ATHENA-HF to determine whether spironolactone treatment induced any detectable pharmacodynamic effects and whether patients with potentially greater aldosterone activity experienced additional decongestion. Trial subjects previously treated with spironolactone were excluded. We first examined for changes in renal potassium handling. Using the baseline serum potassium level as a surrogate marker of spironolactone activity, we then divided each treatment arm into tertiles of baseline serum potassium and explored for differences in laboratory and clinical congestion outcomes. Among spironolactone-naïve patients, the change in serum potassium did not differ after 24 hours or 48 hours but was significantly greater with spironolactone treatment compared to placebo at 72 hours (0.23 ± 0.55 vs 0.03 ± 0.60 mEq/L; P = 0.042) and 96 hours (0.32 ± 0.51 vs 0.13 ± 0.72 mEq/L; P = 0.046). Potassium supplementation was similar at treatment start and at 24 hours, but spironolactone-treated patients required substantially less potassium replacement at 48 hours (24% vs 36%; P = 0.048), 72 hours (21% vs 37%; P = 0.013), and 96 hours (11% vs 38%; P < 0.001). When the treatment arms were divided into tertiles of baseline serum potassium, there were no differences in the 96-hour log N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, net fluid loss, urine output, or dyspnea relief in any of the potassium groups, with no effect modification by treatment exposure. Spironolactone 100 mg/day for 96 hours in patients receiving intravenous loop diuresis for acute heart failure has no clear added decongestive ability but does meaningfully limit potassium wasting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The association between diuretic use and cardiorenal outcomes remains limited in patients with stage 3–5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hypertension. To address this gap, we aim to investigate the long-term clinical impact of diuretic use with its pharmacological classification in Taiwanese patients with stage 3–5 CKD and hypertension who were concurrently received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). Methods: Using data from the National Health Insurance Research Database (January 2008 to December 2019), we focused on individuals with stage 3–5 CKD receiving ACEIs/ARBs between 2010 and 2018. We categorized the cohort into non-diuretic, loop diuretic (furosemide), thiazide diuretic, and combination diuretic groups. We used a Cox proportional hazards regression model with propensity score matching to analyze the influence of diuretics on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) death, and cardiorenal adverse outcomes. Results: The study included 59,719 patients, with 17,585 in the non-diuretic group and 42,134 in the diuretic group. Diuretics including furosemide use was significantly associated the risks of hospitalization for decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF), acute renal failure (ARF), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis, CV mortality, and all-cause mortality (p-value <0.001). Thiazide diuretics showed no such adverse outcomes associations. The group receiving both thiazide and furosemide was more associated with all-cause mortality than the nondiuretic, thiazide, and furosemide monotherapy groups (all p-value <0.001). Conclusion: Among stage 3–5 CKD patients on ACEIs/ARBs, loop diuretics exposure was associated with increased mortality and hospitalization for cardiorenal events, while thiazide diuretics exposure in isolation had no such associations. In the present data, we cannot evaluate the relationship between furosemide-associated adverse outcomes and worse renal function. These findings highlight the need for randomized controlled trials to assess the safety of loop diuretics in this population, urging caution in their prescription without a clear clinical indication. Plain Language Summary: Fluid overload is common in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to their decreased ability to excrete water. Diuretic therapy is often used to manage this condition. However, prolonged use of diuretics may activate harmful bodily systems, including the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the sympathetic nervous system. Our study, focusing on Taiwanese patients with stage 3–5 CKD and hypertension, found that loop diuretics, such as furosemide, were linked to higher risks of hospitalization, mortality, and serious heart and kidney complications. Thiazide diuretics did not show these adverse effects, suggesting they may be safer for these patients. More research is needed to clarify the long-term impact of diuretics on this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on a subgroup analysis of the Diuretic Comparison Project, which finds that chlorthalidone (CTD) is associated with fewer major adverse cardiovascular events compared to hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) in hypertensive patients with a history of myocardial infarction or stroke. Topics include the comparative effectiveness of CTD versus HCT in reducing cardiovascular events; increased risk of hypokalemia with CTD; and the implications for managing hypertension in high-risk patients.

Copyright of Revista Española de Cardiología (18855857) is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article discusses the efficacy of finerenone in treating heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Topics discussed include the impact of finerenone on heart failure outcomes, its safety profile including renal dysfunction and hyperkalemia, and the comparison with previous studies on mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in HFpEF treatment.

Many patients presenting for surgery are established on anti-hypertensive medication or may require additional manipulation of blood pressure perioperatively. This article aims to explore the pharmacology of antihypertensives in relation to cardiovascular physiology, focusing on the effects on the renin–angiotensin system and the autonomic nervous system. The most recent guidance for the stepwise treatment for hypertension is reviewed, aiming to provide anaesthetists with the relevant knowledge to manage hypertensive patients perioperatively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute heart failure remains a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Numerical estimates of annual U.S. hospitalizations for acute heart failure and acute-on-chronic heart failure together number over 1.1 million. Rapid decongestion with intravenous diuretics or modulation of left ventricular afterload with vasodilators has long been a mainstay of acute heart failure treatment. Nevertheless, large randomized clinical trials of vasodilator therapies in acute heart failure have largely been neutral. In this issue of NEJM Evidence, Lukoschewitz et al. conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials of vasodilators in acute heart failure, studying a primary outcome of all-cause mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: The use of urinary sodium to guide diuretics in acute heart failure is recommended by experts and the most recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines. However, there are limited data to support this recommendation. The ENACT-HF study (Efficacy of a Standardized Diuretic Protocol in Acute Heart Failure) investigated the feasibility and efficacy of a standardized natriuresis-guided diuretic protocol in patients with acute heart failure and signs of volume overload. METHODS: ENACT-HF was an international, multicenter, open-label, pragmatic, 2-phase study, comparing the current standard of care of each center with a standardized diuretic protocol, including urinary sodium to guide therapy. The primary end point was natriuresis after 1 day. Secondary end points included cumulative natriuresis and diuresis after 2 days of treatment, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. All end points were adjusted for baseline differences between both treatment arms. RESULTS: Four hundred one patients from 29 centers in 18 countries worldwide were included in the study. The natriuresis after 1 day was significantly higher in the protocol arm compared with the standard of care arm (282 versus 174 mmol; adjusted mean ratio, 1.64; P<0.001). After 2 days, the natriuresis remained higher in the protocol arm (538 versus 365 mmol; adjusted mean ratio, 1.52; P<0.001), with a significantly higher diuresis (5776 versus 4381 mL; adjusted mean ratio, 1.33; P<0.001). The protocol arm had a shorter length of stay (5.8 versus 7.0 days; adjusted mean ratio, 0.87; P=0.036). In-hospital mortality was low and did not significantly differ between the 2 arms (1.4% versus 2.0%; P=0.852). CONCLUSIONS: A standardized natriuresis-guided diuretic protocol to guide decongestion in acute heart failure was feasible, safe, and resulted in higher natriuresis and diuresis, as well as a shorter length of stay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hyperuricemia (HU) has been shown to be associated with an adverse impact on cardiovascular and metabolic risk. Scanty data are available in the general population on the longitudinal changes in serum uric acid (SUA), the occurrence of HU and their potential predictors. We examined during a 25-year follow-up the SUA changes and the factors associated with HU development in the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study. We analyzed data collected in 561 subjects of the PAMELA study evaluated during an average follow-up time amounting to 25.4 ± 1.0 years (mean ± SD). HU was defined by the Uric Acid Right for Heart Health (URRAh) cutoff (5.1 for females and 5.6 mg/dl for males). Mean SUA values during follow-up increased from 4.7 ± 1.1 to 5.0 ± 1.2 mg/dl (P<0.001), the average SUA elevation amounting to of 0.3 ± 1.1 mg/dl 26.7 % of the subjects displayed HU at the follow-up. This was associated at the multivariable analysis with female gender, office, home and 24-h blood pressure, diuretic treatment, serum triglycerides and baseline SUA, as well as the increase in waist circumference and the reduction in renal function. The present study provides longitudinal evidence that in the general population during a 25 year follow-up there is a progressive increase in SUA and HU development. Baseline SUA represents the most important factor associated with these modifications. Gender, renal dysfunction, triglycerides, obesity, diuretic treatment and blood pressure represent other variables capable to predict future occurrence of HU. • Scanty data are available in the general population on the longitudinal changes in serum uric acid (SUA), and on potential predictors of these modifications. • In 561 subjects belonging to the Pressioni Arteriose E Loro Monitorate E Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study the changes in SUA, occurrence on new HU during a 25 year follow-up. Data were also analyzed to examine the potential predictors of these metabolic alterations. • Mean SUA values during follow-up increased from 4.7 ± 1.1 to 5.0 ± 1.2 mg/dl (P<0.001), the average SUA elevation amounting to 0.3 ± 1.1 mg/dl. The percentage of subjects displaying HU at the follow-up amounted to 26.7 %. • Female gender, office, home and 24-h blood pressure, diuretic treatment, serum triglycerides and baseline SUA, the increase in waist circumference and the reduction in renal function were the most important predictors of the SUA changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Biomédica: Revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud is the property of Instituto Nacional de Salud of Colombia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Magnesium sulfate reduces the risk for eclamptic seizures antepartum, intrapartum, and in the immediate postpartum period, however, there are no studies that have evaluated the benefits and risks of magnesium sulfate among women with late postpartum severe hypertension only. Juxtaposed on this clinical uncertainty is the increased incidence of severe hypertension owing to a rise in pregnancies complicated by advanced maternal age, obesity, chronic hypertension, diabetes, and recent protocols for intensive monitoring of blood pressure in the postpartum period. These factors have led to a significant increase in postpartum presentations for the evaluation and management of severe hypertension, in some cases leading to postpartum readmissions for administration of antihypertensive therapy and magnesium sulfate without data demonstrating clear clinical benefit. Postpartum readmissions can have several negative consequences, including interfering with early bonding with a newborn, breastfeeding, and use of scarce healthcare resources. In addition, magnesium sulfate is associated with risks for serious cardiorespiratory depression and bothersome side effects and can delay determining the optimal antihypertensive regimen, which is typically the most pressing clinical need during postpartum presentations of late-postpartum severe hypertension. Eclampsia that occurs more than 48 hours after delivery is rare (constitutes 16% of all cases of eclampsia) and is most commonly preceded by headaches or other cerebral symptoms. In this commentary, we propose an approach to evaluating and managing patients with late postpartum severe hypertension aimed at identifying those women at highest risk for end-organ injury. We recommend that the short- and long-term focus for all patients with severe hypertension should be the optimal management of blood pressures with a goal of close outpatient monitoring when logistically feasible and clinically appropriate. We suggest reserving magnesium sulfate therapy for the subset of patients with neurologic symptoms who may be at highest risk for an eclamptic seizure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Rhinoplasty is one of the most common surgeries in the ENT department. Rhinoplasty hemorrhage is one of the complications that different strategies have been used to reduce it. Reduction of bleeding reduces the risk of complications such as hemolytic and non-hemolytic reactions, acute lung damage, viral and bacterial infections, hypothermia and coagulation disorders. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine, remifentanil and metoral in reducing patient bleeding during rhinoplasty surgery. Materials and Methods: This randomized, double-blind trial was performed on rhinoplasty patients. Rhinoplasty candidates who had the inclusion and exclusion criteria were divided into three groups of remifentanil, metoral and dexmedetomidine according to the random number table. Then 0.5 mg/kg/h of dexmedetomidine in the first group was administered, followed by 100-150 kg/h remifentanil in the second group and 50 mg metoral in the third group. Mean blood pressure, heart rate, mean bleeding and surgeon satisfaction were recorded in designed form. Data were analyzed by Spss-22 software. Results: The mean blood pressure of patients in remifentanil group was lower than the other two groups (P = 0.03). In all three times during surgery, recovery and overall time, the amount of bleeding in the remifentanil group was found to be less than the other two groups. Furthermore, the rate of bleeding in the dexmedetomidine group was found to be less than the metoral group (P = 0.03, P = 0.02). The surgeon's satisfaction score in the remifentanil group was higher than the other two groups. Satisfaction score was higher in dexmedetomidine group than metoral group (P = 0.03). The recovery time in the metoral group was shorter than the other two groups (P = 0.02). Conclusion: Remifentanil caused a good and appropriate reduction of blood pressure in rhinoplasty surgery, causing less bleeding and higher satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hospital at home (HaH) is an innovative care model that may be particularly suited for heart failure (HF). Outpatient visits and inpatient care have been the 2 traditional settings for HF care, yet may not match the social and medical needs of patients at all times. Alternative models such as HaH may represent an effective and patient-centered option for select patients with worsening HF. To date, limited research in HF and other disease states has supported HaH as being safe and lower cost than traditional inpatient admission. Supporting HaH are new payment structures, such as Medicare's Acute Hospital Care at Home waiver program. In combination with outpatient visits, outpatient intravenous diuretic clinics, inpatient care, and cardiac intensive care, HaH could be a core component of a comprehensive care model with the potential to match resource utilization with the needs of patients across the spectrum of HF severity, and improve patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key summary points: Aim: This study aimed at summarizing the available literature on fall risk associated with diuretic and SGLT2i use in older heart failure patients, including the underlying pathophysiology, and to assist clinicians in safe (de)prescribing of these drug classes. Findings: Both heart failure and diuretic or SGLT2 inhibitor use increase fall risk in older adults. Diuretics and SGLT2 inhibitors not only have various fall-related adverse effects, which partly overlap (e.g. tendency to cause hypotension), but also differ: compared to SGLT2is, diuretics display more fall risk factors (e.g. electrolyte abnormalities). The tendency to cause fall-related adverse effects may differ according to diuretic sub-class or even within sub-classes. Message: Decisions to continue or deprescribe diuretics or SGLT2is in fall-prone older HF patients are generally highly complex, but detailed insight into fall-related side effect profiles of these drug classes, and practical clinical decision tools and resources, assist prescribers in rational and personalized (de)prescribing. Purpose: Both heart failure and its treatment with diuretics or SGLT2 inhibitors increase fall risk in older adults. Therefore, decisions to continue or deprescribe diuretics or SGLT2 inhibitors in older heart failure patients who have fallen are generally highly complex and challenging for clinicians. However, a comprehensive overview of information required for rationale and safe decision-making is lacking. The aim of this clinical review was to assist clinicians in safe (de)prescribing of these drug classes in older heart failure patients. Methods: We comprehensively searched and summarized published literature and international guidelines on the efficacy, fall-related safety issues, and deprescribing of the commonly prescribed diuretics and SGLT2 inhibitors in older adults. Results: Both diuretics and SGLT2 inhibitors potentially cause various fall-related adverse effects. Their fall-related side effect profiles partly overlap (e.g., tendency to cause hypotension), but there are also important differences; based on the currently available evidence of this relatively new drug class, SGLT2 inhibitors seem to have a favorable fall-related adverse effect profile compared to diuretics (e.g., low/absent tendency to cause hyperglycemia or electrolyte abnormalities, low risk of worsening chronic kidney disease). In addition, SGLT2 inhibitors have potential beneficial effects (e.g., disease-modifying effects in heart failure, renoprotective effects), whereas diuretic effects are merely symptomatic. Conclusion: (De)prescribing diuretics and SGLT2 inhibitors in older heart failure patients who have fallen is often highly challenging, but this clinical review paper assists clinicians in individualized and patient-centered rational clinical decision-making: we provide a summary of available literature on efficacy and (subclass-specific) safety profiles of diuretics and SGLT2 inhibitors, and practical guidance on safe (de)prescribing of these drugs (e.g. a clinical decision tree for deprescribing diuretics in older adults who have fallen). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • Some studies suggest an increased risk of amputation under diuretics. • However, data are sparse. • Our systematic review identified six studies. • These favoured an increased amputation risk in those at risk of/with clinical LEAD. • Our meta-analysis suggests an amputation excess risk of 75% under diuretics. • Paucity of data precludes specific analysis in different diuretic drug classes. • Further prospective studies are necessary. • Meanwhile, diuretics should be used with caution in these patients. • Alternatives to diuretics should be considered whenever possible. Recently, increased risk of amputation under sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors has been debated. Similar concerns have been raised with other "traditional" diuretics, more particularly in patients with or at risk of lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD). To collect all available data on any potential risk of amputation associated with diuretics in patients with or at risk of LEAD. Additionally, we looked for other limb-related events in these patients. We searched in PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases up to February 2021 for references, using peripheral or lower extremity arterial disease, diuretics and amputation keywords, excluding case reports, experimental animal studies and non-English reports. Among the 1376 hits identified in the databases, six studies were finally included in this review, including one cross-sectional and five longitudinal studies (total of 47,612 participants). One study was limited to thiazide diuretics, one focused on loop diuretics and the remainder mixed all diuretics. All studies reported a significant association between diuretic use and amputation risk in patients with or at high risk of LEAD. Despite some limitations in several studies, the meta-analysis showed an increased risk of amputation associated with diuretics (odds ratio: 1.75, 95% confidence interval: 1.53–1.99; P < 0.001). Beyond amputation, patients with or at risk of LEAD under diuretics appeared to be at increased risk of other lower limb events, mostly in the presence of other comorbidities, including diabetes. Although the amount of data in the literature is scarce, this first systematic review and meta-analysis favours an increased risk of amputation in patients with or at risk of LEAD under diuretics. Further prospective studies must be conducted to provide a better understanding of the mechanisms. Meanwhile, the use of diuretics in these patients should be parsimonious, considering alternatives whenever possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the Drug utilisation pattern in patients of diabetic nephropathy (stage 1–4) in a tertiary care hospital in South-Asia. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the nephrology out-patient-department of a tertiary care hospital in South-Asia. WHO core prescribing, dispensing, and patient care indicators were evaluated, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) encountered by the patients were analysed for causality, severity, preventability, and outcome. The most commonly prescribed antidiabetics in diabetic nephropathy patients were insulin (17.42%), followed by metformin (4.66%). Current drugs of choice SGLT-2 inhibitors were prescribed in a lesser frequency than expected. Loop diuretics and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) were the preferred antihypertensives. The use of ACE inhibitors (1.26%) and ARBs (3.45%) for hypertension was restricted to Stage 1 and 2 nephropathy. The patients were on 6.47 drugs on average. 30.70% of drugs were prescribed by generic names, 59.07% of the drugs were prescribed from the national essential drugs list and 34.03% of the prescribed drugs were supplied by the hospital. CTCAE grade 1 (68.60%) and grade 2 (22.09%) ADR severity was the highest. Prescribing patterns in patients of diabetic nephropathy were adapted from relevant medical evidence, affordability and availability of the drugs. Generic prescribing, availability of drugs and ADR preventability in the hospital have a broad scope for improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tolvaptan sodium phosphate (Samtas®; Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) is a newly available intravenous aquaretic diuretic (commercially available from May 2022), which acts as an arginine vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist. Thus far, optimal patient selection as well as safety and efficacy in real-world practice remain unknown. We experienced two patients with congestive heart failure treated with tolvaptan sodium phosphate. In one patient with right-sided heart failure, oral tolvaptan was converted to intravenous tolvaptan sodium phosphate, and another one with right and left-sided heart failure and impaired swallowing function received intravenous tolvaptan sodium phosphate on a de novo basis. Following the initiation of tolvaptan sodium phosphate, their congestive symptoms ameliorated immediately without any complications. Tolvaptan sodium phosphate may be safe and effective in real-world practice, although further studies are warranted to establish optimal patient selection and clinical management. We report here an initial experience of newly-introduced intravenous tolvaptan sodium phosphate in real-world practice. The novel medication might be particularly suitable for those with severe thirst, congestive gut edema, or requiring rapid amelioration of systemic/pulmonary congestion, although further accumulating experiences are warranted to establish optimal therapeutic strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Combined hydralazine-nitrate has an avenue in the management of subjects with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Exploring the pharmacotherapy in this context will facilitate the clinical utility of the combined therapy. Objective: The main objective of this mini-review was to evaluate the role of combined hydralazine-nitrate in subjects with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Methods: We conducted a literature search on Google scholar, MEDLINE, and PubMed to identify the randomized clinical trials on combined hydralazine-nitrate, in subjects with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. 2760 articles were returned initially out of which 10 trials were conforming to the inclusion criteria. However, three trails were the focus for the current mini-review. Key findings: The current mini-review lends support to the use of combined hydralazine-nitrate in subjects with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The combination may offer subjects who have remained symptomatic with HFrEF despite optimum dosing of standard therapy. Black subjects with HFrEF have proved to benefit from combined hydralazine-nitrate. The combination (e.g. small dose of hydralazine 12.5-25 mg twice a day and isosorbide mononitrate 10 mg twice a day) may provide alternative clinical utility in subjects with contraindications (renal artery stenosis, creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/minute, sustained hyperkalemia) to the use of ACEinh, ARBs, and/or ARNI. Subjects with HFrEF on combined hydralazine-nitrate should be assessed and monitored for systolic BP (keep >120 mmHg) and subjects with chronic kidney disease (keep eGFR > 30 mL/min/1.73 m2). Hydralazine-nitrate was inferior to ACEinh (higher all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Conclusion: The current minireview provides the key points to support the use of hydralazine-nitrate in subjects with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction/background: Fluid overload is common in critically ill children and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Furosemide is the most widely used diuretic to manage excess fluid. In addition to loop diuretics, thiazide diuretics may be used to enhance urine output. Data and information regarding safe and effective dosing of furosemide and chlorothiazide in the critically ill pediatric population are lacking. The primary objective of this study was to compare urine output 24 hours after initiation of furosemide or chlorothiazide in critically ill children. Methods: This was a multi-center retrospective cohort study conducted at 3 academic medical centers. Children between the ages of 1 day and 17 years that received at least one dose of intravenous or oral diuretics from February 2013 to January 2017 were included. Patients with bronchopulmonary dysplasia or on home diuretics were excluded. Only the first dose of diuretic was included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: furosemide versus chlorothiazide. Urine output 24 hours prior to the diuretic was compared to urine output 24 hours after initiation of the diuretic. Results: There were 133 patients identified who met the inclusion criteria for the study. There were 88 patients that received at least one dose of furosemide and 45 that received at least one dose of chlorothiazide. Most patients were male (49, 55.7%) with a median age of 2.3 years. The median dose for furosemide was 0.7 mg/kg and for chlorothiazide was 2.4 mg/kg. There were no statistically significant differences between baseline urine output for furosemide (2.9 ml/kg/hr) or chlorothiazide (2.8 ml/kg/hr), p=0.6. Although not statistically different, urine output 24 hours after the diuretic dose increased by 0.84 ml/kg/hr for furosemide and 0.73 ml/kg/hr for chlorothiazide, p=0.45. Conclusion: Furosemide and chlorothiazide resulted in similar urine output changes 24 hours after an intravenous dose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic heart failure affects over 6 million Americans and is the main reason that people older than 65 years get admitted to the hospital (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020). Management of heart failure requires interdisciplinary efforts involving primary care physicians, cardiologists, nurses, and pharmacists among other providers. Nurses can play a key role in identifying patients at risk for heart failure exacerbation and are often at the front lines providing education regarding medication adherence. This article summarizes the medications used in chronic heart failure and describes common side effects, dosing considerations, and counseling points that are essential for appropriate management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Nefrologia is the property of Revista Nefrologia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Achieving prompt euvolemic state in heart failure (HF) is associated with reduced mortality. Time-sensitive metrics such as door-to-diuretic time , or the time between presentation and administration of intravenous diuretics, may be an important facilitator of achieving a faster euvolemic state and reducing mortality. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether reduced door-to-diuretic time was associated with lower odds of death among hospitalized patients with HF. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients with HF admitted to a medical center was performed between 2020 and 2021. Inclusion criteria were an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision code for HF with positive Framingham Criteria and the use of intravenous bolus furosemide. Exclusion criteria included ventricular assist devices, dialysis, and ultrafiltration therapy. Data collected from the medical records included demographics, echocardiography, staff notes, and medications. The end point was 1-year all-cause mortality. Descriptive statistics, t tests or median test, and multivariate logistic regression were used to describe the sample, evaluate group differences, and determine odds of mortality, respectively. Results: Among 160 charts from patients with HF (age, 70 ± 14.4 years; 52%, n = 83, male; 53%, n = 85, ischemic cardiomyopathy; 83%, n = 134, New York Heart Association classes III–IV), 30% (n = 48) died within 1 year. The median diuretic dose was 40 mg (interquartile range, 20 mg), with a median time of administration of 247 minutes (4.12 hours) (interquartile range, 294 minutes to 4.9 hours). After covariate adjustment, prolonged door-to-diuretic time more than doubled (2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.03–4.8; P =.04) the odds of 1-year mortality. Conclusions: On the basis of this sample of charts from older highly symptomatic patients with HF, delayed door-to-diuretic time was associated with significantly greater odds of 1-year all-cause mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Metolazone and intravenous (IV) chlorothiazide are commonly used diuretics for sequential nephron blockade (SNB) in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Previous studies suggest metolazone may be comparable with chlorothiazide in terms of efficacy and safety. The objective of this study was to determine whether IV chlorothiazide is superior to metolazone in increasing net urine output (UOP) of hospitalized patients with ADHF.Methods and Results: This retrospective cohort study included hospitalized patients with ADHF and evidence of loop diuretic resistance in a tertiary academic medical center. The primary end point was the change in net 24-hour UOP in patients treated with IV chlorothiazide compared with metolazone. The relative cost of chlorothiazide doses and metolazone doses administered during SNB was a notable secondary end point. The median change in net 24-hour UOP in the IV chlorothiazide group was -1481.9 mL (interquartile range -2696.0 to -641.0 mL) and -1780.0 mL (interquartile range -3084.5 to -853.5 mL) in the metolazone group (P = .05) across 220 hospital encounters. The median cost of chlorothiazide and metolazone doses used during SNB was $360 and $4, respectively (P < .01).Conclusions: Chlorothiazide was not superior to metolazone in changing the net 24-hour UOP of patients with ADHF and loop resistance. Preferential metolazone use in SNB is a potential cost-saving measure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a growing disease in the United States. Exacerbations of CHF can lead to acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and hospitalizations. Nurses play a key role in the treatment of ADHF as they administer medications, monitor patients' response to therapy, and can prompt providers to alter therapy if therapeutic outcomes are not being achieved. Nurses also play a vital role in discharge education for patients who are hospitalized for ADHF, as they can counsel patients on ways to reduce further hospitalizations. It is important for nurses to understand and recognize symptoms of ADHF, pharmacologic treatments for ADHF, and common etiologies of ADHF to help improve patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Literature on pregabalin use in patients with heart failure is largely limited to patient case reports and cohort studies. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pregabalin initiation on diuretic requirements in patients with heart failure. A retrospective analysis of patients with heart failure who were started on pregabalin between January 1, 2014, and September 1, 2021, at the Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System was used. The primary objective was to determine the median change in loop diuretic dose, in furosemide dose equivalents, 6 months after pregabalin initiation. Of 58 patients analyzed, there was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome (P = 0.162). The secondary outcomes were found to be nonstatistically significant, and there was no correlation between pregabalin dose and outcomes. This represents the largest analysis of diuretic dose requirements in patients with heart failure after initiation of pregabalin. Although there was no difference in the median change of diuretic dose prescribed, pregabalin should still be used with caution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) is characterized by the inability to concentrate urine that results in polyuria and polydipsia, despite having normal or elevated plasma concentrations of arginine vasopressin (AVP). In this study, we review the clinical aspects and diagnosis of NDI, the various etiologies, current treatment options and potential future developments. NDI has different clinical manifestations and approaches according to the etiology. Hereditary forms of NDI are mainly caused by mutations in the genes that encode key proteins in the AVP signaling pathway, while acquired causes are normally associated with specific drug exposure, especially lithium, and hydroelectrolytic disorders. Clinical manifestations of the disease vary according to the degree of dehydration and hyperosmolality, being worse when renal water losses cannot be properly compensated by fluid intake. Regarding the diagnosis of NDI, it is important to consider the symptoms of the patient and the diagnostic tests, including the water deprivation test and the baseline plasma copeptin measurement, a stable surrogate biomarker of AVP release. Without proper treatment, patients may developcomplications leading to high morbidity and mortality, such as severe dehydration and hypernatremia. In that sense, the treatment of NDI consists in decreasing the urine output, while allowing appropriate fluid balance, normonatremia, and ensuring an acceptable quality of life. Therefore, therapeutic options include nonpharmacological interventions, including sufficient water intake and a low-sodium diet, and pharmacological treatment. The main medications used for NDI are thiazide diuretics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and amiloride, used isolated or in combination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Long-term tolvaptan (TLV) administration provided no clear benefit for all patients with chronic heart failure. • The TLV strategy may be a cost-effective therapeutic option in specific patients. • Patients receiving high-dose furosemide may benefit from the TLV strategy. Tolvaptan (TLV) is effective for acute heart failure (HF) with congestion, but its long-term administration in patients with chronic HF (CHF) remains controversial. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness of TLV for CHF treatment has not yet been investigated. Thus, we sought to validate the cost-effectiveness of TLV for CHF treatment in Japan. A Markov model was developed to compare total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between long-term TLV strategy and the standard strategy using furosemide for CHF. The target population included 75-year-old patients with CHF. The effectiveness of the TLV strategy for CHF treatment was determined based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. We used a 10-year horizon, with sensitivity analyses for significant variables and a scenario analysis for patients with CHF receiving high-dose furosemide (≥60 mg per day). In the base case analysis, the total cost of the long-term TLV strategy was higher than that of the standard strategy (¥3,243,779 vs. ¥1,179,964). The total QALYs of the long-term TLV strategy were lower than those of the standard strategy (4.52 vs 4.59). Thus, a standard TLV prescription for CHF treatment has no clinical or economic benefit. In the scenario analysis (i.e. in patients with CHF receiving high-dose furosemide), the long-term TLV strategy was more effective (total QALYs, 5.10 vs. 4.41) but more expensive (total costs, ¥3,540,558 vs. ¥1,272,208) than the standard strategy. The ICER of the TLV strategy against the standard strategy (¥3,289,579/QALY) was below the willingness-to-pay of ¥5,000,000, which suggests that the long-term TLV strategy is cost-effective relative to the standard strategy in patients with CHF receiving high-dose furosemide. Long-term TLV administration did not provide a clear benefit for all patients with CHF. However, this treatment strategy may be a cost-effective therapeutic option for patients who require high-dose furosemide. [Display omitted]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Management of congestion by assessing the degree of systemic/pulmonary congestion and adjusting the dose of diuretics is of great importance to improve mortality and morbidity in patients with congestive heart failure, whereas it is sometimes challenging particularly in the outpatient clinic, where careful and daily assessment of congestion is impossible. We had a patient with congestive heart failure due to cardiac amyloidosis, whose congestion was successfully managed by referencing repeated non-invasive quantification of pulmonary congestion using a recently-introduced remote dielectric sensing system as well as appropriate adjustment of diuretics doses at once per month outpatient clinic. Remote dielectric sensing might be a promising supportive tool to guide the management of congestion in the outpatient clinic. Remote dielectric sensing system, which is a novel non-invasive wearable device to quantify the degree of pulmonary congestion easily and quickly within a minute, would be a promising supportive tool to guide titration of the dose of diuretics in patients with congestive heart failure in outpatient clinic follow up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Certain classes of antihypertensive drug may exert specific, blood pressure (BP)-independent protective effects on end-organ damages such as left ventricular hypertrophy, although the overall evidence has not been definitive in clinical trials. To unravel antihypertensive drug-induced gene expression changes that are potentially related to the amelioration of end-organ damages, we performed in vivo phenotypic evaluation and transcriptomic analysis on the heart and the kidney, with administration of antihypertensive drugs to two inbred strains (ie, hypertensive and normotensive) of rats. We chose 6 antihypertensive classes: enalapril (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor), candesartan (angiotensin receptor blocker), hydrochlorothiazide (diuretics), amlodipine (calcium-channel blocker), carvedilol (vasodilating β-blocker), and hydralazine. In the tested rat strains, 4 of 6 drugs, including 2 renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, were effective for BP lowering, whereas the remaining 2 drugs were not. Besides BP lowering, there appeared to be some interdrug heterogeneity in phenotypic changes, such as suppressed body weight gain and body weight-adjusted heart weight reduction. For the transcriptomic response, a considerable number of genes showed prominent mRNA expression changes either in a BP-dependent or BP-independent manner with substantial diversity between the target organs. Noticeable changes of mRNA expression were induced particularly by renin-angiotensin system blockade, for example, for genes in the natriuretic peptide system (Nppb and Corin) in the heart and for those in the renin-angiotensin system/kallikrein-kinin system (Ren and rat Klk1 paralogs) and those related to calcium ion binding (Calb1 and Slc8a1) in the kidney. The research resources constructed here will help corroborate occasionally inconclusive evidence in clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The greater antihypertensive responses to initial therapy with calcium channel blockers (CCBs) or thiazide-type diuretics than renin-angiotensin system blockers as initial therapy in non-Hispanic Black (NHB) adults was recognized in the US High BP guidelines from 1988 to 2003. The 2014 Report from Panel Members Appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (2014 aJNC8 Report) and the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association High Blood Pressure Guideline were the first to recommend CCBs or thiazide-type diuretics rather than renin-angiotensin system blockers as initial therapy in NHB. We assessed the temporal relationship of these recommendations on self-reported CCB or thiazide-type diuretics monotherapy by NHB and NHW adults with hypertension absent compelling indications for β-blockers or renin-angiotensin system blockers in National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2015 to 2018 versus 2007 to 2012 (after versus before 2014 aJNC8 Report). CCB or thiazide-type diuretics monotherapy was unchanged in NHW adults (17.1% versus 18.1%, P=0.711) and insignificantly higher after 2014 among NHB adults (43.7% versus 38.2%, P=0.204), although CCB monotherapy increased (29.5% versus 21.0%, P=0.021) and renin-angiotensin system blocker monotherapy fell (44.5% versus 31.0%, P=0.008). Although evidence-based CCB monotherapy increased among NHB adults in 2015 to 2018, hypertension control declined as untreated hypertension and monotherapy increased. While a gap between recommended and actual monotherapy persists, evidence-based monotherapy appears insufficient to improve hypertension control in NHB adults, especially given evidence for worsening therapeutic inertia. Initiating treatment with single-pill combinations and timely therapeutic intensification when required to control hypertension are evidence-based, race-neutral options for improving hypertension control among NHB adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Nosileftiki is the property of Hellenic Nurses' Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article explores NEPHROTIC SYNDROME IS A CONSTELLATION OF CLINICAL FEATURES THAT RESULT FROM dysfunctional glomerular filtration. It is not a specific disease itself but is the mode of presentation for several diseases that affect the glomerulus. Nephrotic syndrome may occur in people of all ages, with an overall annual incidence of approximately 2-3 per 100,000.

• Antihypertensives and lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) are often used concurrently. • The effect of LLT in combination with different antihypertensives is unclear. • LLT+ACE-I and LLT+diuretic treatments showed similar effects on mortality and CVD. • LLT+ACE-I linked to similar diabetes risk than LLT+diuretic. Antihypertensives and lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) are often used concurrently. To determine whether there was a difference in clinical outcomes when older patients with LLT were prescribed angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitors (ACE-Is) compared with diuretics. This analysis included 648 LLT older users free of cardiovascular disease (CVD) from a trial comparing ACE-I versus diuretic-based therapy. Comparisons were made between LLT+ACE-I (n = 335) and LLT+diuretic groups (n = 313) using multivariable Cox proportional-hazard models. Primary endpoints were all-cause and CVD mortality (in-trial [4.1-year]+post-trial [6.9-year]) and secondary endpoints (in-trial) were the composite of all-cause mortality and first CVD events and its components, CVD mortality and incident diabetes. There were no significant differences between the two groups for the primary endpoints over the in-trial plus post-trial follow-up, nor was there a difference for any secondary outcomes over the in-trial follow-up. The LLT+ACE-I and LLT+diuretic combinations showed similar effects in CVD-free older individuals. Randomised trials are needed to provide conclusive evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sudden cardiac death is estimated to affect approximately three million people worldwide each year. Substrates and triggers often play a complex role in these deaths. Among the heart cells, disturbed potassium homeostasis is one such trigger. Hypokalemia and transient drops in potassium concentration are significant issues. Heart failure (HF) therapy is increasingly complicated by maintaining normal serum potassium (K+) homeostasis. As a result of the use of loop diuretics hypokalemia has become a severe and feared side effect of treatment. Hypokalemia in HF also indicates greater neurohormonal activity and progression of disease. Personalized drug use and monitoring of electrolytes are crucial for successful treatment. The lowest dose of diuretic necessary to maintain euvolemia should be prescribed to HF patients with symptoms (New York Heart Association Class III-IV). Aldosterone receptor antagonists, spironolactone can be used to treat mild hypokalemia. For more severe, K + supplement is recommended. Levels should be routinely monitored and kept between 4.0 and 5.5 mEq/l. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Konuralp Medical Journal / Konuralp Tip Dergisi is the property of Duzce University Medical School and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Dyspnea is a subjective experience of breathing discomfort that consists of qualitatively distinct sensations, varies in intensity, and can only be known through the patient's report. Dyspnea is akin to suffocation and is one of the most distressing symptoms experienced by patients with advanced illness and at the end of life. Common approaches to dyspnea management, such as pulmonary rehabilitation, breathing strategies, or supplemental oxygen, have become accepted through pragmatic use or because studies do not include dyspnea as a measured outcome. Patients and clinicians urgently need evidence-based treatments to alleviate this frightening symptom. To fill this gap, a group of dyspnea researchers with expertise to conduct a literature review of evidence-based interventions for dyspnea in patients with serious illness produced these guidelines. We present the evidence from the strongest recommendations for practice to the weakest recommendations and include practical considerations for clinical nurses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Decongestion is a primary goal during hospitalizations for decompensated heart failure (HF). However, data surrounding the preferred route and strategy of diuretic administration are limited with varying results in prior studies.Methods: This is a retrospective analysis using patients from ASCEND-HF with a stable diuretic strategy in the first 24 hours following randomization. Patients were divided into three groups: intravenous (IV) continuous, IV bolus and oral strategy. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, 30-day composite cardiovascular mortality or HF rehospitalization and 180-day all-cause mortality were compared across groups. Inverse propensity weighted modeling was used for adjustment.Results: Among 5,738 patients with a stable diuretic regimen in the first 24 hours (80% of overall ASCEND trial), 3,944 (68.7%) patients received IV intermittent bolus administration of diuretics, 799 (13.9%) patients received IV continuous therapy and 995 (17.3%) patients with oral administration. Patients in the IV continuous group had a higher baseline creatinine (IV continuous 1.4 [1.1-1.7]; intermittent bolus 1.2 [1.0-1.6]; oral 1.2 [1.0-1.4] mg/dL; P <0.001) and high NTproBNP (IV continuous 5,216 [2,599-11,603]; intermittent bolus 4,944 [2,339-9,970]; oral 3,344 [1,570-7,077] pg/mL; P <0.001). There was no difference between IV continuous and intermittent bolus group in weight change, total urine output and change in renal function till 10 days/discharge (adjusted P >0.05 for all). There was no difference in 30 day mortality and HF readmission (adjusted OR 1.08 [95%CI: 0.74, 1.57]; P = 0.701) and 180 days mortality (adjusted OR 1.04 [95%CI: 0.75, 1.43]; P = 0.832).Conclusion: In a large cohort of patients with decompensated HF, there were no significant differences in diuretic-related in-hospital, or post-discharge outcomes between IV continuous and intermittent bolus administration. Tailoring appropriate diuretic strategy to different states of acute HF and congestion phenotypes needs to be further investigated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Adulteration of diuretics in dietary supplements for weight-loss is increasing. • Using UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap (LC-HRMS), simultaneous analysis of diuretics is available. • The fragmentation pathways of diuretics were proposed using UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap (LC-HRMS). Diuretics are used to treat the edematous state in cases of renal insufficiency, nephrotic syndrome, liver cirrhosis, and heart failure. These compounds are used by athletes to lose weight and are included in the list of prohibited substances by the World Anti-Doping Agency. They are also used by obese and overweight people for losing weight, and there are a number of recent reports on the contamination of dietary supplements with diuretics. Due to the alluring online marketing and blogging, there is an extensive misuse of products that are illegally adulterated with diuretics, which has seriously increased health risks. Therefore, it is essential to develop an analytical method for the detection of adulterants in such substances. In this study, 23 diuretics, categorized into four groups, namely, thiazide diuretics (e.g., bendroflumethiazide), loop diuretics (e.g., bumetanide), potassium-sparing diuretics (e.g., amiloride), and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (e.g., acetazolamide), were analyzed using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole orbitrap (UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap). Their fragmentation was elucidated based on the MS/MS data. The 124 products were screened by the UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap (LC-HRMS) method, and the confirmed compounds were quantitated by a previously established LC-MS/MS method. Approximately 5% of the samples were found to be illegally contaminated with diuretics at a concentration of 0.051–162 mg/g. The high selectivity and sensitivity of the UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap (LC-HRMS) method, in combination with the established fragmentation, offer a new approach for the rapid and accurate screening of diuretics in adulterated products, which would be ultimately beneficial for the public health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dyspnea is a subjective experience of breathing discomfort that consists of qualitatively distinct sensations, varies in intensity, and can only be known through the patient's report. Dyspnea is akin to suffocation and is one of the most distressing symptoms experienced by patients with advanced illness and at the end of life. Common approaches to dyspnea management, such as pulmonary rehabilitation, breathing strategies, or supplemental oxygen, have become accepted through pragmatic use or because studies do not include dyspnea as a measured outcome. Patients and clinicians urgently need evidence-based treatments to alleviate this frightening symptom. To fill this gap, a group of dyspnea researchers with expertise to conduct a literature review of evidence-based interventions for dyspnea in patients with serious illness produced these guidelines. We present the evidence from the strongest recommendations for practice to the weakest recommendations and include practical considerations for clinical nurses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]