Electronic books (e-storybooks) are widely used in early childhood classrooms in efforts to encourage engagement in storybooks while promoting emergent literacy development. This article assesses the current research on e-storybooks for supporting young children and offers suggestions about how this evidence can be translated into best practice in classroom. Findings suggest that the use of high quality interactive e-storybooks may support emergent literacy development through the use of scaffolding, thus, supporting vocabulary development, engagement, and comprehension of the story. Evidence suggests that lower quality e-storybooks may offer distracting digital features including animations and sounds unrelated to the story. Additional information about effective implementation in the classroom is provided. The use of e-storybooks in early childhood classrooms seems to be a growing trend. Educators are interested in the use of reading technologies to support young emergent readers, especially those who are at risk for reading failure. E-storybooks allow children to read and listen to a book while obtaining emergent literacy supports including digital features (e.g., animations, word pronunciations, etc.). Many of these books are commercially available to educators and parents and they allow children opportunities to read independently, even when they lack foundational reading skills. Despite the growing popularity of e-storybooks, there continues to be a lack of evidence literature to explain the extent to which electronic books support children's emergent literacy development. This article examines current research on e-storybooks and provides suggestions about how educators can use critical evidence to better support young struggling readers in early childhood classrooms when using e-storybooks. Early education experiences can provide children with opportunities to develop essential foundational skills in literacy that directly translate into later school success (Burchinal, Peisner- Feinburg, Pianta, & Howes, 2002; McCardle, Scarborough, & Catts, 2001). In the area of early literacy, intervention is cost effective and can improve the future academic achievement of children who are at-risk for academic failure (Ramey & Campbell, 1991; Schweinhart, Barnes, & Weikart, 1993). If children are unable to gain needed skills prior to beginning school, additional and more in-depth services may be required over time (Barnett, 1998). Stanovich's work (1986, 1993) recognizes the strong relationship between early deficits in literacy skills and later risks for reading difficulties. The progressive widening of the gap between readers and non-readers is labeled as the Matthew Effect (Stanovich, 1986), a principle that emphasizes the importance of early interventions delivered to young children that seek to reduce this gap in its earliest manifestations. This empirical evidence combined with government reports (e.g., National Reading Panel; NRP, 2000) encouraged politicians to create legislation requiring the use of high-quality, scientifically-based instruction to increase children's academic achievements in reading if they are at risk (NCLB, 2001). Examinations surrounding best practices for early detection and intervention in the area of reading are therefore growing (Adams, 1990; Snow et al., 1998; Torgesen & Burgess, 1998) and a growing body of work in this area emphasizes the use of technology for improving children's emergent literacy skills. Thus, educators are working to provide high-quality evidence-based emergent literacy instruction during the critical developmental time period of early childhood, especially for children who are most at risk due to poverty and disabilities (Barnett, Brown, & Shore, 2004). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]