1. Australian midwifery student's perceptions of the benefits and challenges associated with completing a portfolio of evidence for initial registration: Paper based and ePortfolios.
- Author
-
Gray, Michelle, Downer, Terri, and Capper, Tanya
- Subjects
CONTENT analysis ,EXPERIENCE ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,FOCUS groups ,HEALTH occupations students ,INTERVIEWING ,RECORDING & registration ,RESEARCH methodology ,MIDWIVES ,RESEARCH funding ,STUDENTS ,STUDENT attitudes ,MIDWIFERY ,EMPLOYMENT portfolios ,THEMATIC analysis - Abstract
Portfolios are used in midwifery education to provide students with a central place to store their accumulative evidence of clinical experience for initial registration in Australia. Portfolio formats can be paper-based or electronic. Anecdotal discussion between midwifery students in Queensland debated the best format to document the requirements for the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Accreditation Council (ANMAC) standard 8.11. Midwifery students using paper-based portfolios envisioned that an ePortfolio would be streamline, simple, safe to use, and able to be used anywhere with WIFI, while some students using an ePortfolio expressed a desire to have a paper-based portfolio as a hard copy. This situation called for evidence of a comparison to resolve the debate. The aim of this study was to investigate midwifery students' experiences of the benefits and challenges between paper-based and ePortfolios when compiling evidence to meet the requirements for initial registration as a midwife in Australia (ANMAC, 2014). • Each type of portfolio had challenges and benefits. • Portfolio completion is time consuming, and stressful due to the need for verification of evidence. • Students require early and regular feedback on portfolio development. • National standards are required for consistency in documentation across universities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF