1. Passive Privatization: Understanding Urban Regulatory Response--or lack thereof--to the Uberization of the American City.
- Author
-
Wolf, Andrew
- Subjects
PUBLIC transit ,EMPLOYEE rights ,RIDESHARING services ,PRIVATIZATION ,LABOR market ,ADVENT ,DEBATE - Abstract
The rise of the gig-economy in the last decade has caused a furor of public interest and debate. The argument centers on whether this phenomena is positive for workers and society. From an employment and labor standpoint the key component of the gig-economy is that companies operating in this space claim that they have no employees and that those who use their app to work are instead independent contractors. This paper places this debate in the context of the wider urban sphere. The disavowal of an employment relationship is not only a challenge to urban labor markets but also presents a massive challenge to our urban regulatory regimes. Adopting the gig economy's legal claims and promises at face value represents an ideological shift in the responsibility cities have historically taken for the maintenance of their urban infrastructure, both physical and social, and serves to further privatize a city's social political economy. To evaluate the impact of the gig-economy on cities themselves this paper evaluates how cities have responded to the advent of gig-employment, particularly transportation network companies (TNCs), such as Uber and Lyft. Through a combination of original data, reevaluation of previous studies' data, and government data this study provides a detailed analysis of the predictors of urban response to the arrival of TNCs in the largest U.S. cities. This analysis is conducted through detailed descriptive statistics and an ordered logit regression analysis of urban regulatory responses to the gig-economy. This study finds that cities have largely abdicated their responsibilities, engaging in passive privatization, especially in California where these companies are based. Where cities have attempted to regulate the gig-economy this study finds that it is larger cities, cities with stricter existing regulation, and cities where the gig-economy came later that took the strongest response. Finally, this paper ends with a discussion of how workers and unions are fighting back against the gig-economy's passive urban privatization of municipal transit systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019