1. The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study
- Author
-
Lauri M.M. van den Berg, Marie-Clare Balaam, Rebecca Nowland, Gill Moncrieff, Anastasia Topalidou, Suzanne Thompson, Gill Thomson, Ank de Jonge, Soo Downe, George Ellison, Alan Fenton, Alexander Heazell, Carol Kingdon, Zoe Matthews, Alexandra Severns, Alison Wright, Naseerah Akooji, Jo Cull, Lauri van den Berg, Nicola Crossland, Claire Feeley, Beata Franso, Steph Heys, Arni Sarian, Maria Booker, Jane Sandall, Jim Thornton, Tisian Lynskey-Wilkie, Vanessa Wilson, Rebecca Abe, Tinuke Awe, Toyin Adeyinka, Ruth Bender-Atik, Lia Brigante, Rebecca Brione, Franka Cadée, Elizabeth Duff, Tim Draycott, Duncan Fisher, Annie Francis, Arie Franx, M.C. Erasmus, Lucy Frith, Louise Griew, Clea Harmer, Caroline Homer, Marian Knight, Amanda Mansfield, Neil Marlow, Trixie Mcaree, David Monteith, Keith Reed, Yana Richens, Lucia Rocca-Ihenacho, Mary Ross-Davie, Seana Talbot, Myles Taylor, Maureen Treadwell, Midwifery Science, APH - Personalized Medicine, APH - Quality of Care, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development (AR&D), and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development
- Subjects
Infection Control ,Policy Drivers ,COVID-19 ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,HN ,HM ,B720 ,United Kingdom ,QR ,RA0421 ,Newborn Care ,Maternity and Midwifery ,Maternal Health Services ,RG ,Netherlands - Abstract
Background: The national health care response to coronavirus (COVID-19) has varied between countries. The United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL) have comparable maternity and neonatal care systems, and experienced similar numbers of COVID-19 infections, but had different organisational responses to the pandemic. Understanding why and how similarities and differences occurred in these two contexts could inform optimal care in normal circumstances, and during future crises. Aim: To compare the UK and Dutch COVID-19 maternity and neonatal care responses in three key domains: choice of birthplace, companionship, and families in vulnerable situations. Method: A multi-method study, including documentary analysis of national organisation policy and guidance on COVID-19, and interviews with national and regional stakeholders. Findings: Both countries had an infection control focus, with less emphasis on the impact of restrictions. Differences included care providers’ fear of contracting COVID-19; the extent to which personalised care was embedded in the care system before the pandemic; and how far multidisciplinary collaboration and service-user involvement were prioritised. Conclusion: We recommend that countries should 1) make a systematic plan for crisis decision-making before a serious event occurs, and that this must include authentic service-user involvement, multidisciplinary collaboration, and protection of staff wellbeing 2) integrate women’s and families’ values into the maternity and neonatal care system, ensuring equitable inclusion of the most vulnerable and 3) strengthen community provision to ensure system wide resilience to future shocks from pandemics, or other unexpected large-scale events.
- Published
- 2023