Back to Search Start Over

The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study

Authors :
Lauri M.M. van den Berg
Marie-Clare Balaam
Rebecca Nowland
Gill Moncrieff
Anastasia Topalidou
Suzanne Thompson
Gill Thomson
Ank de Jonge
Soo Downe
George Ellison
Alan Fenton
Alexander Heazell
Carol Kingdon
Zoe Matthews
Alexandra Severns
Alison Wright
Naseerah Akooji
Jo Cull
Lauri van den Berg
Nicola Crossland
Claire Feeley
Beata Franso
Steph Heys
Arni Sarian
Maria Booker
Jane Sandall
Jim Thornton
Tisian Lynskey-Wilkie
Vanessa Wilson
Rebecca Abe
Tinuke Awe
Toyin Adeyinka
Ruth Bender-Atik
Lia Brigante
Rebecca Brione
Franka Cadée
Elizabeth Duff
Tim Draycott
Duncan Fisher
Annie Francis
Arie Franx
M.C. Erasmus
Lucy Frith
Louise Griew
Clea Harmer
Caroline Homer
Marian Knight
Amanda Mansfield
Neil Marlow
Trixie Mcaree
David Monteith
Keith Reed
Yana Richens
Lucia Rocca-Ihenacho
Mary Ross-Davie
Seana Talbot
Myles Taylor
Maureen Treadwell
Midwifery Science
APH - Personalized Medicine
APH - Quality of Care
Amsterdam Reproduction & Development (AR&D)
Amsterdam Reproduction & Development
Source :
ASPIRE-COVID19 Research Team 2023, ' The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19 : A comparative study ', Women and Birth, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 127-135 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.03.010, ASPIRE-COVID19 Research Team 2022, ' The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19 : A comparative study ', Women and birth . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.03.010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.03.010, Women and birth. Elsevier
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2023.

Abstract

Background: The national health care response to coronavirus (COVID-19) has varied between countries. The United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL) have comparable maternity and neonatal care systems, and experienced similar numbers of COVID-19 infections, but had different organisational responses to the pandemic. Understanding why and how similarities and differences occurred in these two contexts could inform optimal care in normal circumstances, and during future crises. Aim: To compare the UK and Dutch COVID-19 maternity and neonatal care responses in three key domains: choice of birthplace, companionship, and families in vulnerable situations. Method: A multi-method study, including documentary analysis of national organisation policy and guidance on COVID-19, and interviews with national and regional stakeholders. Findings: Both countries had an infection control focus, with less emphasis on the impact of restrictions. Differences included care providers’ fear of contracting COVID-19; the extent to which personalised care was embedded in the care system before the pandemic; and how far multidisciplinary collaboration and service-user involvement were prioritised. Conclusion: We recommend that countries should 1) make a systematic plan for crisis decision-making before a serious event occurs, and that this must include authentic service-user involvement, multidisciplinary collaboration, and protection of staff wellbeing 2) integrate women’s and families’ values into the maternity and neonatal care system, ensuring equitable inclusion of the most vulnerable and 3) strengthen community provision to ensure system wide resilience to future shocks from pandemics, or other unexpected large-scale events.

Details

ISSN :
18715192
Volume :
36
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Women and Birth
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1e5393583360d7ee16492155e1c93aee
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.03.010