1. Performance of the PRISM I, PIM2, PELOD-2 and PRISM IV scoring systems in western China: a multicenter prospective study
- Author
-
Xue-Peng Zhang, Yun-Xia Feng, Yang Li, Guo-Yan Lu, Xin-Yue Zhou, Can-Zheng Wei, Xi-Ying Gui, Kai-Ying Yang, Tong Qiu, Jiang-Yuan Zhou, Hua Yao, Geng Zhang, Wen-Qi Zhang, Yu-Hang Hu, Hong Wu, Si-Yuan Chen, and Yi Ji
- Subjects
Infant ,Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases ,Intensive Care Units, Pediatric ,Severity of Illness Index ,Cohort Studies ,Repressor Proteins ,ROC Curve ,Area Under Curve ,Proto-Oncogene Proteins ,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health ,Humans ,Hospital Mortality ,Prospective Studies ,Child - Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the four scoring tools in predicting mortality in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in western China.This was a multicenter, prospective, cohort study conducted in six PICUs in western China. The performances of the scoring systems were evaluated based on both discrimination and calibration. Discrimination was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each model. Calibration was measured across defined groups based on mortality risk using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test.A total of 2034 patients were included in this study, of whom 127 (6.2%) died. For the entire cohort, AUCs for Pediatric Risk of Mortality Score (PRISM) I, Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM2), Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score-2 (PELOD-2) and PRISM IV were 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-0.92], 0.84 (95% CI 0.80-0.88), 0.80 (95% CI 0.75-0.85), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.94), respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit Chi-square value was 12.71 (P = 0.12) for PRISM I, 4.70 (P = 0.79) for PIM2, 205.98 (P 0.001) for PELOD-2, and 7.50 (P = 0.48) for PRISM IV [degree of freedom (df) = 8]. The standardized mortality ratios obtained with the PRISM I, PIM2, PELOD-2, and PRISM IV models were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75-1.01), 0.97 (95% CI, 0.85-1.12), 1.74 (95% CI, 1.58-1.92), and 1.05 (95% CI, 0.92-1.21), respectively.PRISM IV performed best and can be used as a prediction tool in PICUs in Western China. However, PRISM IV needs to be further validated in NICUs.
- Published
- 2022