1. Blockchain’s Value Addition in Network Industry : A multi-case study in electricity and telecommunications industry
- Author
-
Gothankar, Tikshala, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Enginyeria Química, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Stratix B.V., Valderrama Angel, César Alberto, Sadowski, Bert, and Rood, Hendrik
- Subjects
blockchain ,Blockchains (Databases) -- Industrial applications -- Technical report ,Energy industries ,Electricity markets ,Cadena de blocs (Bases de dades) -- Aplicacions industrials -- Informes tècnics ,Transaction costs ,Indústries energètiques ,Distributed technology ,Data exchange ,Immutability ,Decentralisation ,Trust ,Spectrum assignments ,Sistemes de distribució d'energia elèctrica -- Administració ,PMSE ,Consensus mechanism ,Energies::Aspectes econòmics [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC] ,Intermediaries ,Electric power systems -- Management - Abstract
There could hardly be any industry that has still not explored blockchain. Believing in how the technology behind bitcoin could be changing money, business, and the world1, blockchain’s impact has been felt everywhere. Blockchain is considered a revolutionary technology in its ability to store information and enable transactions. Since the application of this technology varies with the context, the blockchain technology has taken different forms ranging from its public permissionless network that is open to all to its private permissioned network that is restricted to a few. Not indulging in the debates whether a particular blockchain is really a blockchain or not, this research instead explores blockchain’s features that the stakeholders of some of the most regulated industries find valuable. The main research question that this thesis answers is ‘Why do entities enable or restrict blockchain affordances?’ A general promise of blockchain has been its potential of operating as a trustless system making unnecessary the trust to be placed on centralised (trusted) third parties, intermediaries, brokers etc. This makes blockchain capable of eliminating intermediaries and the transaction costs associated with them. Since, this study focusses on the regulated industries namely electricity and telecommunication industry, a transaction cost analysis is carried out in identifying the stakeholders (the transacting parties and the intermediaries), the ‘play of the game’ i.e. institutional arrangement and the ‘rules of the game’ i.e. institutional environment in carrying out exchanges in the two contexts. However, after reviewing the status quo of the contexts, it can be deduced that the existing systems already reduce certain transaction costs incurred by certain stakeholders of these sectors. These systems are established through regulations for example, the regulatory directives that restrains the behavioural uncertainty of participants, the standardization of the information exchange that reduces the compliance costs of participants and the intermediaries that reduces the transaction costs of the market participants. Moreover, a lack of commercial cases of smart contracts, questions whether the technology could automate intermediary functions and further contribute to reduction in transaction costs. Acknowledging a lack of commercial blockchain usecases, this study takes another approach in understanding blockchain’s value addition by investigating its niche. The study operationalizes transaction cost framework to investigate the very first application of blockchain – the Bitcoin. Concluding blockchain’s uniqueness over other ICT is its consensus mechanism, the study establishes the trust factors that blockchain enables and the digital scarcity that is now possible through blockchain. The study finds that bitcoin does not disintermediate all the intermediaries but circumvents a very specific intermediary, moreover, bitcoin also addresses a very specific trust issue. Examining if these findings are also relevant for the electricity and telecommunication industry, the research carries out a multi-case study. The research investigates the expected/realized benefits of blockchain by the project developers in electricity and telecommunication industry through semi-structured interviews. The research also investigates if blockchain is being differently adopted in these sectors by understanding the blockchain design in these two contexts and analyses the reasons for the same. The main findings of the multi-case study are that the blockchain projects in the electricity and telecommunication industry does not address any existing distrust. With the existing ICT employed for exchanges in these two contexts, the study illuminates on an important aspect that decentralisation is not unique to blockchain and is possible through a non-blockchain distributed infrastructure. Given that even a non-blockchain distributed infrastructure does not aim to disintermediate but to decentralise power of a central entity, the research concludes that blockchain is not about disintermediation. The research finds that blockchain usecases in these two industries share a commonality and that they benefit from blockchain’s immutability feature. The study deduces that the aspect blockchain decentralises is the power of an entity influencing a data change; after the data is recorded on blockchain. Given that the majority of blockchain developments are a permissioned network, this study points out that to gain benefits from its immutability feature, blockchain requires decentralisation to avoid a threat of collusion
- Published
- 2022