1. Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
-
Rikke Krüger Jensen, Tue Secher Jensen, Bart W. Koes, Jan Hartvigsen, and General Practice
- Subjects
Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Population ,Neurogenic claudication ,Review ,Asymptomatic ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Spinal Stenosis ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Prevalence ,Humans ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Medical diagnosis ,education ,Aged ,030222 orthopedics ,education.field_of_study ,Lumbar Vertebrae ,Primary Health Care ,business.industry ,Lumbar spinal stenosis ,medicine.disease ,Meta-analysis ,Radiological weapon ,Surgery ,Neurosurgery ,medicine.symptom ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,MRI - Abstract
Purpose: To estimate the prevalence of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in adults, identified by clinical symptoms and/or radiological criteria. Methods: Systematic review of the literature. Pooled prevalence estimates by care setting and clinical or radiological diagnostic criteria were calculated and plotted [PROSPERO ID: CRD42018109640]. Results: In total, 41 papers reporting on 55 study samples were included. The overall risk of bias was considered high in two-thirds of the papers. The mean prevalence, based on a clinical diagnosis of LSS in the general population, was 11% (95% CI 4–18%), 25% (95% CI 19–32%) in patients from primary care, 29% (95% CI 22–36%) in patients from secondary care and 39% (95% CI 39–39%) in patients from mixed primary and secondary care. Evaluating the presence of LSS based on radiological diagnosis, the pooled prevalence was 11% (95% CI 5–18%) in the asymptomatic population, 38% (95% CI − 10 to 85%) in the general population, 15% (95% CI 13–18%) in patients from primary care, 32% (95% CI 22–41%) in patients from secondary care and 21% (95% CI 16–26%) in a mixed population from primary and secondary care. Conclusions: The mean prevalence estimates based on clinical diagnoses vary between 11 and 39%, and the estimates based on radiological diagnoses similarly vary between 11 and 38%. The results are based on studies with high risk of bias, and the pooled prevalence estimates should therefore be interpreted with caution. With an growing elderly population, there is a need for future low risk-of-bias research clarifying clinical and radiological diagnostic criteria of lumbar spinal stenosis. Graphic abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.]
- Published
- 2020