Back to Search
Start Over
Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Source :
- Jensen, R K, Jensen, T S, Koes, B & Hartvigsen, J 2020, ' Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis ', European Spine Journal, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 2143-2163 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06339-1, Jensen, R K, Jensen, T S, Koes, B & Hartvigsen, J 2020, ' Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations : a systematic review and meta-analysis ', European Spine Journal, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 2143-2163 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06339-1, European Spine Journal, 29(9), 2143-2163. Springer-Verlag
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Springer-Verlag, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Purpose: To estimate the prevalence of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in adults, identified by clinical symptoms and/or radiological criteria. Methods: Systematic review of the literature. Pooled prevalence estimates by care setting and clinical or radiological diagnostic criteria were calculated and plotted [PROSPERO ID: CRD42018109640]. Results: In total, 41 papers reporting on 55 study samples were included. The overall risk of bias was considered high in two-thirds of the papers. The mean prevalence, based on a clinical diagnosis of LSS in the general population, was 11% (95% CI 4–18%), 25% (95% CI 19–32%) in patients from primary care, 29% (95% CI 22–36%) in patients from secondary care and 39% (95% CI 39–39%) in patients from mixed primary and secondary care. Evaluating the presence of LSS based on radiological diagnosis, the pooled prevalence was 11% (95% CI 5–18%) in the asymptomatic population, 38% (95% CI − 10 to 85%) in the general population, 15% (95% CI 13–18%) in patients from primary care, 32% (95% CI 22–41%) in patients from secondary care and 21% (95% CI 16–26%) in a mixed population from primary and secondary care. Conclusions: The mean prevalence estimates based on clinical diagnoses vary between 11 and 39%, and the estimates based on radiological diagnoses similarly vary between 11 and 38%. The results are based on studies with high risk of bias, and the pooled prevalence estimates should therefore be interpreted with caution. With an growing elderly population, there is a need for future low risk-of-bias research clarifying clinical and radiological diagnostic criteria of lumbar spinal stenosis. Graphic abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.]
- Subjects :
- Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Population
Neurogenic claudication
Review
Asymptomatic
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Spinal Stenosis
Internal medicine
medicine
Prevalence
Humans
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Medical diagnosis
education
Aged
030222 orthopedics
education.field_of_study
Lumbar Vertebrae
Primary Health Care
business.industry
Lumbar spinal stenosis
medicine.disease
Meta-analysis
Radiological weapon
Surgery
Neurosurgery
medicine.symptom
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
MRI
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14320932 and 09406719
- Volume :
- 29
- Issue :
- 9
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- European Spine Journal
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....2bedded215bad385e4f8b445d63cfbb1