Back to Search Start Over

Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors :
Rikke Krüger Jensen
Tue Secher Jensen
Bart W. Koes
Jan Hartvigsen
General Practice
Source :
Jensen, R K, Jensen, T S, Koes, B & Hartvigsen, J 2020, ' Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis ', European Spine Journal, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 2143-2163 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06339-1, Jensen, R K, Jensen, T S, Koes, B & Hartvigsen, J 2020, ' Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations : a systematic review and meta-analysis ', European Spine Journal, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 2143-2163 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06339-1, European Spine Journal, 29(9), 2143-2163. Springer-Verlag
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Springer-Verlag, 2020.

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the prevalence of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in adults, identified by clinical symptoms and/or radiological criteria. Methods: Systematic review of the literature. Pooled prevalence estimates by care setting and clinical or radiological diagnostic criteria were calculated and plotted [PROSPERO ID: CRD42018109640]. Results: In total, 41 papers reporting on 55 study samples were included. The overall risk of bias was considered high in two-thirds of the papers. The mean prevalence, based on a clinical diagnosis of LSS in the general population, was 11% (95% CI 4–18%), 25% (95% CI 19–32%) in patients from primary care, 29% (95% CI 22–36%) in patients from secondary care and 39% (95% CI 39–39%) in patients from mixed primary and secondary care. Evaluating the presence of LSS based on radiological diagnosis, the pooled prevalence was 11% (95% CI 5–18%) in the asymptomatic population, 38% (95% CI − 10 to 85%) in the general population, 15% (95% CI 13–18%) in patients from primary care, 32% (95% CI 22–41%) in patients from secondary care and 21% (95% CI 16–26%) in a mixed population from primary and secondary care. Conclusions: The mean prevalence estimates based on clinical diagnoses vary between 11 and 39%, and the estimates based on radiological diagnoses similarly vary between 11 and 38%. The results are based on studies with high risk of bias, and the pooled prevalence estimates should therefore be interpreted with caution. With an growing elderly population, there is a need for future low risk-of-bias research clarifying clinical and radiological diagnostic criteria of lumbar spinal stenosis. Graphic abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14320932 and 09406719
Volume :
29
Issue :
9
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Spine Journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....2bedded215bad385e4f8b445d63cfbb1