Search

In this article, we analyze with tools of the Discourse Analysis the positions that were manifested on the project of Integral Sexual Education in the parliamentary debate that took place in the Chamber of Deputies, on August 16, 2006. Beyond the pronouncement in favor or against the sanction of the law, we are interested in investigating the argumentative logics (Angenot, 2015) that develop the different positions on the project, that is, determine whether or not they share the same framework of beliefs, if the argumentative proposals start of the same budgets, necessary condition to establish the bases for the discussion in view of an eventual consensus on the subject., En este artículo, analizamos con herramientas del Análisis del Discurso las posturas que se manifestaron sobre el proyecto de Educación Sexual Integral en el debate parlamentario que tuvo lugar en la Cámara de Diputados, el día 16 de agosto de 2006. Más allá del pronunciamiento a favor o en contra de la sanción de la ley, nos interesa indagar en las lógicas argumentativas (Angenot, 2015) que desarrollan las diferentes posiciones sobre el proyecto, esto es, determinar si comparten o no un mismo marco de creencias, si los planteos argumentativos parten de los mismos presupuestos, condición necesaria para establecer las bases para la discusión en miras a un eventual consenso sobre el tema.

In this article, we analyze with tools of the Discourse Analysis the positions that were manifested on the project of Integral Sexual Education in the parliamentary debate that took place in the Chamber of Deputies, on August 16, 2006. Beyond the pronouncement in favor or against the sanction of the law, we are interested in investigating the argumentative logics (Angenot, 2015) that develop the different positions on the project, that is, determine whether or not they share the same framework of beliefs, if the argumentative proposals start of the same budgets, necessary condition to establish the bases for the discussion in view of an eventual consensus on the subject., En este artículo, analizamos con herramientas del Análisis del Discurso las posturas que se manifestaron sobre el proyecto de Educación Sexual Integral en el debate parlamentario que tuvo lugar en la Cámara de Diputados, el día 16 de agosto de 2006. Más allá del pronunciamiento a favor o en contra de la sanción de la ley, nos interesa indagar en las lógicas argumentativas (Angenot, 2015) que desarrollan las diferentes posiciones sobre el proyecto, esto es, determinar si comparten o no un mismo marco de creencias, si los planteos argumentativos parten de los mismos presupuestos, condición necesaria para establecer las bases para la discusión en miras a un eventual consenso sobre el tema.

The subject of the analysis in the article are two editions of Grzegorz Pawełs of Brzeziny’s works treated as an update of the 16th-century polemical discourse. The purpose of the sketch is a preliminary description of this discourse, taking into account its parameters such as the institutional framework, cultural and social conditions, speakers and their interrelationships, the subject of speech, knowledge, basic concepts, ideas and values contained in the discourse., The subject of the analysis in the article are two editions of Grzegorz Pawełs of Brzeziny’s works treated as an update of the 16th-century polemical discourse. The purpose of the sketch is a preliminary description of this discourse, taking into account its parameters such as the institutional framework, cultural and social conditions, speakers and their interrelationships, the subject of speech, knowledge, basic concepts, ideas and values contained in the discourse.

This study approach the phenomenon of discursive inter-incomprehension. Our goal is to observe the interaction that occurs between discourses polemics in the discursive field of deafness, which constituted a discursive space delimited by two distinct positions on deafness: Audism Based Discourse and Deaf Based Discourse. Analyses indicate that the first one will be by means of anticipation - and denial - of what could be his simulacrum to the second one. The DFS will be defined precisely from what it is not, in order to build an "I" from the denial of a "non-self."KEYWORDS: Discourse. Deaf. Simulacrum. Polemical discourse., Este estudo aborda o fenômeno da interincompreensão discursiva e objetiva analisar a interação que se estabelece entre discursos polêmicos no campo discursivo da surdez, onde delimitamos um espaço discursivo constituído por dois posicionamentos distintos sobre a surdez: o Discurso de Fundamentação Surda e o Discurso de Fundamentação Ouvintista. As análises indicam que o primeiro discurso constitui-se por meio da antecipação – e da negação – do que poderia ser o seu simulacro, aos olhos do discurso segundo, e que se define justamente a partir do que ele não é, de forma a construir um “eu” a partir da negação de um “não-eu”.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Discurso. Surdos. Simulacro. Polêmica discursiva. ABSTRACTThis study approach the phenomenon of discursive inter-incomprehension. Our goal is to observe the interaction that occurs between discourses polemics in the discursive field of deafness, which constituted a discursive space delimited by two distinct positions on deafness: Audism Based Discourse and Deaf Based Discourse. Analyses indicate that the first one will be by means of anticipation - and denial - of what could be his simulacrum to the second one. The DFS will be defined precisely from what it is not, in order to build an "I" from the denial of a "non-self."KEYWORDS: Discourse. Deaf. Simulacrum. Polemical discourse.

This study approach the phenomenon of discursive inter-incomprehension. Our goal is to observe the interaction that occurs between discourses polemics in the discursive field of deafness, which constituted a discursive space delimited by two distinct positions on deafness: Audism Based Discourse and Deaf Based Discourse. Analyses indicate that the first one will be by means of anticipation - and denial - of what could be his simulacrum to the second one. The DFS will be defined precisely from what it is not, in order to build an "I" from the denial of a "non-self."KEYWORDS: Discourse. Deaf. Simulacrum. Polemical discourse., Este estudo aborda o fenômeno da interincompreensão discursiva e objetiva analisar a interação que se estabelece entre discursos polêmicos no campo discursivo da surdez, onde delimitamos um espaço discursivo constituído por dois posicionamentos distintos sobre a surdez: o Discurso de Fundamentação Surda e o Discurso de Fundamentação Ouvintista. As análises indicam que o primeiro discurso constitui-se por meio da antecipação – e da negação – do que poderia ser o seu simulacro, aos olhos do discurso segundo, e que se define justamente a partir do que ele não é, de forma a construir um “eu” a partir da negação de um “não-eu”.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Discurso. Surdos. Simulacro. Polêmica discursiva. ABSTRACTThis study approach the phenomenon of discursive inter-incomprehension. Our goal is to observe the interaction that occurs between discourses polemics in the discursive field of deafness, which constituted a discursive space delimited by two distinct positions on deafness: Audism Based Discourse and Deaf Based Discourse. Analyses indicate that the first one will be by means of anticipation - and denial - of what could be his simulacrum to the second one. The DFS will be defined precisely from what it is not, in order to build an "I" from the denial of a "non-self."KEYWORDS: Discourse. Deaf. Simulacrum. Polemical discourse.

?Après avoir redessiné les étapes essentielles de l’ascension politique du M5S (Movimento 5 Stelle), l’objectif de cet article est de montrer comment la langue de Beppe Grillo et des grillini s’inscrit dans le cadre d’une forme communicationnelle débouchant sur une polémique exacerbée qui, de la place publique à la place virtuelle du Web, construit, entre vulgarité, obscénité et théâtralité, la rhétorique du vaffa. Le corpus analysé propose des extraits configurant la Toile comme le lieu d’un nouvel espace agonal où la formule Vaffa Day file les stratégies d’attaque ad personam de l’adversaire.?, ?After having analysed the fundamental steps of the political rise to power of the M5S (Movimento 5 Stelle), the aim of this article is to show how Beppe Grillo’s language, as that of the grillini, falls into the framework of a means of communication that leads to an exacerbated polemical discourse that shapes, from the public to the cyber space, among vulgarity, lewdness and drama, the vaffa rhetoric. The corpus here analysed suggests some abstracts that place the Internet as a venue for a new agonal space where the slogan Vaffa Day tracks the opponent’s ad personam attack strategies.?, ?Tras haber recorrido las etapas fundamentales del ascenso político del M5S (Movimento 5 Stelle), la finalidad del presente trabajo es comprobar cómo la forma de hablar de Beppe Grillo y de los llamados grillini se puede considerar una comunicación polémica que tanto en las plazas como en el Web construye, de forma vulgar, obscena y teatral, la retórica del vaffa. El corpus objeto de este estudio propone una selección cuyo propósito es describir Internet como un lugar de espacio agonal en el cual la fórmula Vaffa Day crea estrategias de ataque ad personam contra el adversario.?