1. A randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial of pembrolizumab plus epacadostat versus sunitinib or pazopanib as first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-679/ECHO-302).
- Author
-
Lara, Primo, Lara, Primo, Villanueva, Luis, Ibanez, Carolina, Erman, Mustafa, Lee, Jae, Heinrich, Daniel, Lipatov, Oleg, Gedye, Craig, Gokmen, Erhan, Acevedo, Alejandro, Semenov, Andrey, Park, Se, Gafanov, Rustem, Kose, Fatih, Jones, Mark, Du, Xiaoqi, Munteanu, Mihaela, Perini, Rodolfo, Choueiri, Toni, Motzer, Robert, Lara, Primo, Lara, Primo, Villanueva, Luis, Ibanez, Carolina, Erman, Mustafa, Lee, Jae, Heinrich, Daniel, Lipatov, Oleg, Gedye, Craig, Gokmen, Erhan, Acevedo, Alejandro, Semenov, Andrey, Park, Se, Gafanov, Rustem, Kose, Fatih, Jones, Mark, Du, Xiaoqi, Munteanu, Mihaela, Perini, Rodolfo, Choueiri, Toni, and Motzer, Robert
- Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy-based combinations have emerged as standard therapies for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, combined with epacadostat, an indoleamine 2,3-deoxygenase 1 selective inhibitor, demonstrated promising antitumor activity in a phase 1 study in advanced solid tumors, including mRCC. METHODS: KEYNOTE-679/ECHO-302 was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3 study (NCT03260894) that compared pembrolizumab plus epacadostat with sunitinib or pazopanib as first-line treatment for mRCC. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic clear cell RCC and had not received systemic therapy. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks plus epacadostat 100 mg orally twice daily versus sunitinib 50 mg orally once daily (4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off treatment) or pazopanib 800 mg orally once daily. Original dual primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival. Enrollment was stopped when a phase 3 study in melanoma of pembrolizumab plus epacadostat compared with pembrolizumab monotherapy did not meet its primary end point. This protocol was amended, and primary end point was changed to investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. RESULTS: One-hundred-twenty-nine patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab plus epacadostat (n = 64) or sunitinib/pazopanib (n = 65). Median (range) follow-up, defined as time from randomization to data cutoff, was 10.3 months (2.2-14.3) and 10.3 months (2.7-13.8) in the pembrolizumab plus epacadostat and sunitinib/pazopanib arms, respectively. ORRs were similar between pembrolizumab plus epacadostat (31.3% [95% CI 20.2-44.1] and sunitinib/pazopanib (29.2% [18.6-41.8]). Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 34.4% and 42.9% of patients in the pembrolizumab plus epac
- Published
- 2024