Back to Search Start Over

A randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial of pembrolizumab plus epacadostat versus sunitinib or pazopanib as first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-679/ECHO-302).

Authors :
Lara, Primo
Lara, Primo
Villanueva, Luis
Ibanez, Carolina
Erman, Mustafa
Lee, Jae
Heinrich, Daniel
Lipatov, Oleg
Gedye, Craig
Gokmen, Erhan
Acevedo, Alejandro
Semenov, Andrey
Park, Se
Gafanov, Rustem
Kose, Fatih
Jones, Mark
Du, Xiaoqi
Munteanu, Mihaela
Perini, Rodolfo
Choueiri, Toni
Motzer, Robert
Lara, Primo
Lara, Primo
Villanueva, Luis
Ibanez, Carolina
Erman, Mustafa
Lee, Jae
Heinrich, Daniel
Lipatov, Oleg
Gedye, Craig
Gokmen, Erhan
Acevedo, Alejandro
Semenov, Andrey
Park, Se
Gafanov, Rustem
Kose, Fatih
Jones, Mark
Du, Xiaoqi
Munteanu, Mihaela
Perini, Rodolfo
Choueiri, Toni
Motzer, Robert
Source :
BMC Cancer; vol 23, iss Suppl 1
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy-based combinations have emerged as standard therapies for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, combined with epacadostat, an indoleamine 2,3-deoxygenase 1 selective inhibitor, demonstrated promising antitumor activity in a phase 1 study in advanced solid tumors, including mRCC. METHODS: KEYNOTE-679/ECHO-302 was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3 study (NCT03260894) that compared pembrolizumab plus epacadostat with sunitinib or pazopanib as first-line treatment for mRCC. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic clear cell RCC and had not received systemic therapy. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks plus epacadostat 100 mg orally twice daily versus sunitinib 50 mg orally once daily (4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off treatment) or pazopanib 800 mg orally once daily. Original dual primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival. Enrollment was stopped when a phase 3 study in melanoma of pembrolizumab plus epacadostat compared with pembrolizumab monotherapy did not meet its primary end point. This protocol was amended, and primary end point was changed to investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. RESULTS: One-hundred-twenty-nine patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab plus epacadostat (n = 64) or sunitinib/pazopanib (n = 65). Median (range) follow-up, defined as time from randomization to data cutoff, was 10.3 months (2.2-14.3) and 10.3 months (2.7-13.8) in the pembrolizumab plus epacadostat and sunitinib/pazopanib arms, respectively. ORRs were similar between pembrolizumab plus epacadostat (31.3% [95% CI 20.2-44.1] and sunitinib/pazopanib (29.2% [18.6-41.8]). Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 34.4% and 42.9% of patients in the pembrolizumab plus epac

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
BMC Cancer; vol 23, iss Suppl 1
Notes :
application/pdf, BMC Cancer vol 23, iss Suppl 1
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1452694902
Document Type :
Electronic Resource