12 results on '"Calchi Novati, Sebastiano"'
Search Results
2. The Scientific Context of WFIRST Microlensing in the 2020s
- Author
-
Yee, Jennifer C., Akeson, Rachel, Calchi Novati, Sebastiano, Henderson, Calen B., Shvartzvald, Yossi, Yee, Jennifer C., Akeson, Rachel, Calchi Novati, Sebastiano, Henderson, Calen B., and Shvartzvald, Yossi
- Abstract
As discussed in Exoplanet Science Strategy (National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine 2018), WFIRST (Akeson et al. 2019) is uniquely capable of finding planets with masses as small as Mars at separations comparable to Jupiter, i.e., beyond the current ice lines of main sequence stars. In semimajor axis, these planets fall between the close-in planets found by Kepler (Coughlin et al. 2016) and the wide separation gas giants seen by direct imaging (e.g. Lagrange et al. 2009) and ice giants inferred from ALMA observations (Zhang et al. 2018). Furthermore, the smallest planets WFIRST can detect are smaller than the planets probed by radial velocity (Mayor et al. 2011; Bonfils et al. 2013) and Gaia (Perryman et al. 2014) at comparable separations. Interpreting planet populations to infer the underlying formation and evolutionary processes requires combining results from multiple detection methods to measure the full variation of planets as a function of planet size, orbital separation, and host star mass. Microlensing is the only way to find planets from 0.5 to 5M⊕ at separations of 1 to 5 au. Fundamentally, the case for a microlensing survey from space has not changed in the past 20 years: going to space allows wide-field diffraction-limited observations that can resolve main-sequence stars in the bulge, which in turn allows the detection and characterization of the smallest microlensing signals including those from planets with masses at least as small as Mars (Bennett & Rhie 2002). What has changed is that ground-based microlensing is reaching its limits, which underscores the scientific necessity for a space-based microlensing survey to measure the population of the smallest planets. Ground-based microlensing has found a break in the mass-ratio distribution at about a Neptune mass-ratio (Suzuki et al. 2016; Jung et al. 2018), implying that Neptunes are the most common microlensing planet and that planets smaller than this are rare. However, ground-based
- Published
- 2019
3. Measurement of the Free-Floating Planet Mass Function with Simultaneous Euclid and WFIRST Microlensing Parallax Observations
- Author
-
Penny, Matthew T., Bachelet, Etienne, Johnson, Samson, Beaulieu, Jean-Phillipe, Kerins, Eamonn, Rhodes, Jason, Akeson, Rachel, Bennett, David, Beichman, Charles, Bhattacharya, Aparna, Bozza, Valerio, Calchi Novati, Sebastiano, Gaudi, B. Scott, Henderson, Calen B., Mao, Shude, Poleski, Radek, Ranc, Clément, Sahu, Kailash C., Shvartzvald, Yossi, Street, Rachel, Penny, Matthew T., Bachelet, Etienne, Johnson, Samson, Beaulieu, Jean-Phillipe, Kerins, Eamonn, Rhodes, Jason, Akeson, Rachel, Bennett, David, Beichman, Charles, Bhattacharya, Aparna, Bozza, Valerio, Calchi Novati, Sebastiano, Gaudi, B. Scott, Henderson, Calen B., Mao, Shude, Poleski, Radek, Ranc, Clément, Sahu, Kailash C., Shvartzvald, Yossi, and Street, Rachel
- Abstract
Free-floating planets are the remnants of violent dynamical rearrangements of planetary systems. It is possible that even our own solar system ejected a large planet early in its evolution. WFIRST will have the ability to detect free-floating planets over a wide range of masses, but it will not be able to directly measure their masses. Microlensing parallax observations can be used to measure the masses of isolated objects, including free-floating planets, by observing their microlensing events from two locations. The intra-L2 separation between WFIRST and Euclid is large enough to enable microlensing parallax measurements, especially given the exquisite photometric precision that both spacecraft are capable of over wide fields. In this white paper we describe how a modest investment of observing time could yield hundreds of parallax measurements for WFIRST's bound and free-floating planets. We also describe how a short observing campaign of precursor observations by Euclid can improve WFIRST's bound planet and host star mass measurements.
- Published
- 2019
4. The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope: 100 Hubbles for the 2020s
- Author
-
Akeson, Rachel L., Armus, Lee, Calchi Novati, Sebastiano, Henderson, Calen B., Shvartzvald, Yossi, Wang, Yun, Akeson, Rachel L., Armus, Lee, Calchi Novati, Sebastiano, Henderson, Calen B., Shvartzvald, Yossi, and Wang, Yun
- Abstract
The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) is a 2.4m space telescope with a 0.281 deg^2 field of view for near-IR imaging and slitless spectroscopy and a coronagraph designed for > 10^8 starlight suppresion. As background information for Astro2020 white papers, this article summarizes the current design and anticipated performance of WFIRST. While WFIRST does not have the UV imaging/spectroscopic capabilities of the Hubble Space Telescope, for wide field near-IR surveys WFIRST is hundreds of times more efficient. Some of the most ambitious multi-cycle HST Treasury programs could be executed as routine General Observer (GO) programs on WFIRST. The large area and time-domain surveys planned for the cosmology and exoplanet microlensing programs will produce extraordinarily rich data sets that enable an enormous range of Archival Research (AR) investigations. Requirements for the coronagraph are defined based on its status as a technology demonstration, but its expected performance will enable unprecedented observations of nearby giant exoplanets and circumstellar disks. WFIRST is currently in the Preliminary Design and Technology Completion phase (Phase B), on schedule for launch in 2025, with several of its critical components already in production.
- Published
- 2019
5. Key Technologies for the Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope Coronagraph Instrument
- Author
-
Bailey, Vanessa P., Armus, Lee, Balasubramanian, Bala, Berriman, Bruce, Cady, Eric, Calchi Novati, Sebastiano, Ciardi, David, Crill, Brendan, Demers, Richard, Effinger, Robert, Frerking, Margaret, Gelino, Dawn, Harding, Leon, Helou, George, Kern, Brian, Krist, John, Laine, Seppo, Lindensmith, Chris, Lowrance, Patrick, Prada, Camilo Mejia, Mennesson, Bertrand, Meshkat, Tiffany, Moody, Dwight, Morrissey, Patrick, Moustakas, Leonidas, Noecker, Charley, Paladini, Roberta, Poberezhskiy, Ilya, Ramírez, Solange, Rhodes, Jason, Riggs, A. J. E., Seo, Byoung-Joon, Shaklan, Stuart, Shi, Fang, Stapelfeldt, Karl, Tang, Hong, Trauger, John, Ygouf, Marie, Zhao, Feng, Zhou, Hanying, Bailey, Vanessa P., Armus, Lee, Balasubramanian, Bala, Berriman, Bruce, Cady, Eric, Calchi Novati, Sebastiano, Ciardi, David, Crill, Brendan, Demers, Richard, Effinger, Robert, Frerking, Margaret, Gelino, Dawn, Harding, Leon, Helou, George, Kern, Brian, Krist, John, Laine, Seppo, Lindensmith, Chris, Lowrance, Patrick, Prada, Camilo Mejia, Mennesson, Bertrand, Meshkat, Tiffany, Moody, Dwight, Morrissey, Patrick, Moustakas, Leonidas, Noecker, Charley, Paladini, Roberta, Poberezhskiy, Ilya, Ramírez, Solange, Rhodes, Jason, Riggs, A. J. E., Seo, Byoung-Joon, Shaklan, Stuart, Shi, Fang, Stapelfeldt, Karl, Tang, Hong, Trauger, John, Ygouf, Marie, Zhao, Feng, and Zhou, Hanying
- Abstract
The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) Coronagraph Instrument (CGI) is a high-contrast imager and integral field spectrograph that will enable the study of exoplanets and circumstellar disks at visible wavelengths. Ground-based high-contrast instrumentation has fundamentally limited performance at small working angles, even under optimistic assumptions for 30m-class telescopes. There is a strong scientific driver for better performance, particularly at visible wavelengths. Future flagship mission concepts aim to image Earth analogues with visible light flux ratios of more than 10^10. CGI is a critical intermediate step toward that goal, with a predicted 10^8-9 flux ratio capability in the visible. CGI achieves this through improvements over current ground and space systems in several areas: (i) Hardware: space-qualified (TRL9) deformable mirrors, detectors, and coronagraphs, (ii) Algorithms: wavefront sensing and control; post-processing of integral field spectrograph, polarimetric, and extended object data, and (iii) Validation of telescope and instrument models at high accuracy and precision. This white paper, submitted to the 2018 NAS Exoplanet Science Strategy call, describes the status of key CGI technologies and presents ways in which performance is likely to evolve as the CGI design matures.
- Published
- 2019
6. Wide-Orbit Exoplanet Demographics
- Author
-
Bennett, David P., Akeson, Rachel, Calchi Novati, Sebastiano, Christiansen, Jessie, Fulton, Benjamin J., Henderson, Calen B., Bennett, David P., Akeson, Rachel, Calchi Novati, Sebastiano, Christiansen, Jessie, Fulton, Benjamin J., and Henderson, Calen B.
- Abstract
The Kepler, K2 and TESS transit surveys are revolutionizing our understanding of planets orbiting close to their host stars and our understanding of exoplanet systems in general, but there remains a gap in our understanding of wide-orbit planets. This gap in our understanding must be filled if we are to understand planet formation and how it affects exoplanet habitability. We summarize current and planned exoplanet detection programs using a variety of methods: microlensing (including WFIRST), radial velocities, Gaia astrometry, and direct imaging. Finally, we discuss the prospects for joint analyses using results from multiple methods and obstacles that could hinder such analyses. We endorse the findings and recommendations published in the 2018 National Academy report on Exoplanet Science Strategy. This white paper extends and complements the material presented therein.
- Published
- 2019
7. Radii of 88 M Subdwarfs and Updated Radius Relations for Low-Metallicity M Dwarf Stars
- Author
-
Kesseli, Aurora Y., Kirkpatrick, J. Davy, Fajardo-Acosta, Sergio B., Penny, Matthew T., Gaudi, B. Scott, Veyette, Mark, Boeshaar, Patricia C., Henderson, Calen B., Cushing, Michael C., Calchi-Novati, Sebastiano, Shvartzvald, Yossi, Muirhead, Philip S., Kesseli, Aurora Y., Kirkpatrick, J. Davy, Fajardo-Acosta, Sergio B., Penny, Matthew T., Gaudi, B. Scott, Veyette, Mark, Boeshaar, Patricia C., Henderson, Calen B., Cushing, Michael C., Calchi-Novati, Sebastiano, Shvartzvald, Yossi, and Muirhead, Philip S.
- Abstract
M subdwarfs are low-metallicity M dwarfs that typically inhabit the halo population of the Galaxy. Metallicity controls the opacity of stellar atmospheres; in metal poor stars, hydrostatic equilibrium is reached at a smaller radius, leading to smaller radii for a given effective temperature. We compile a sample of 88 stars that span spectral classes K7 to M6 and include stars with metallicity classes from solar-metallicity dwarf stars to the lowest metallicity ultra-subdwarfs to test how metallicity changes the stellar radius. We fit models to Palomar Double Spectrograph (DBSP) optical spectra to derive effective temperatures ($T_\mathrm{eff}$) and we measure bolometric luminosities ($L_\mathrm{bol}$) by combining broad wavelength-coverage photometry with Gaia parallaxes. Radii are then computed by combining the $T_\mathrm{eff}$ and $L_\mathrm{bol}$ using the Stefan-Boltzman law. We find that for a given temperature, ultra-subdwarfs can be as much as five times smaller than their solar-metallicity counterparts. We present color-radius and color-surface brightness relations that extend down to [Fe/H] of $-$2.0 dex, in order to aid the radius determination of M subdwarfs, which will be especially important for the WFIRST exoplanetary microlensing survey., Comment: Accepted to AJ
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. White Paper: Exoplanetary Microlensing from the Ground in the 2020s
- Author
-
Yee, Jennifer C., Anderson, Jay, Akeson, Rachel, Bachelet, Etienne, Beichman, Charles, Bellini, Andrea, Bennett, David, Bhattacharya, Aparna, Bozza, Valerio, Calchi Novati, Sebastiano, Clarkson, Will, Ciardi, David R., Gould, Andrew, Henderson, Calen B., Jacklin, Savannah R., Khakpash, Somayeh, Mao, Shude, Mennesson, Bertrand, Nataf, David M., Penny, Matthew, Pepper, Joshua, Poleski, Radek, Ranc, Clement, Sahu, Kailash, Shvartzvald, Y., Street, R. A., Sumi, Takahiro, Suzuki, Daisuke, Yee, Jennifer C., Anderson, Jay, Akeson, Rachel, Bachelet, Etienne, Beichman, Charles, Bellini, Andrea, Bennett, David, Bhattacharya, Aparna, Bozza, Valerio, Calchi Novati, Sebastiano, Clarkson, Will, Ciardi, David R., Gould, Andrew, Henderson, Calen B., Jacklin, Savannah R., Khakpash, Somayeh, Mao, Shude, Mennesson, Bertrand, Nataf, David M., Penny, Matthew, Pepper, Joshua, Poleski, Radek, Ranc, Clement, Sahu, Kailash, Shvartzvald, Y., Street, R. A., Sumi, Takahiro, and Suzuki, Daisuke
- Abstract
Microlensing can access planet populations that no other method can probe: cold wide-orbit planets beyond the snow line, planets in both the Galactic bulge and disk, and free floating planets (FFPs). The demographics of each population will provide unique constraints on planet formation. Over the past 5 years, U.S. microlensing campaigns with Spitzer and UKIRT have provided a powerful complement to international ground-based microlensing surveys, with major breakthroughs in parallax measurements and probing new regions of the Galaxy. The scientific vitality of these projects has also promoted the development of the U.S. microlensing community. In the 2020s, the U.S. can continue to play a major role in ground-based microlensing by leveraging U.S. assets to complement ongoing ground-based international surveys. LSST and UKIRT microlensing surveys would probe vast regions of the Galaxy, where planets form under drastically different conditions. Moreover, while ground-based surveys will measure the planet mass-ratio function beyond the snow line, adaptive optics (AO) observations with ELTs would turn all of these mass ratios into masses and also distinguish between very wide-orbit planets and genuine FFPs. To the extent possible, cooperation of U.S. scientists with international surveys should also be encouraged and supported.
- Published
- 2018
9. Radii of 88 M Subdwarfs and Updated Radius Relations for Low-Metallicity M Dwarf Stars
- Author
-
Kesseli, Aurora Y., Kirkpatrick, J. Davy, Fajardo-Acosta, Sergio B., Penny, Matthew T., Gaudi, B. Scott, Veyette, Mark, Boeshaar, Patricia C., Henderson, Calen B., Cushing, Michael C., Calchi-Novati, Sebastiano, Shvartzvald, Yossi, Muirhead, Philip S., Kesseli, Aurora Y., Kirkpatrick, J. Davy, Fajardo-Acosta, Sergio B., Penny, Matthew T., Gaudi, B. Scott, Veyette, Mark, Boeshaar, Patricia C., Henderson, Calen B., Cushing, Michael C., Calchi-Novati, Sebastiano, Shvartzvald, Yossi, and Muirhead, Philip S.
- Abstract
M subdwarfs are low-metallicity M dwarfs that typically inhabit the halo population of the Galaxy. Metallicity controls the opacity of stellar atmospheres; in metal poor stars, hydrostatic equilibrium is reached at a smaller radius, leading to smaller radii for a given effective temperature. We compile a sample of 88 stars that span spectral classes K7 to M6 and include stars with metallicity classes from solar-metallicity dwarf stars to the lowest metallicity ultra-subdwarfs to test how metallicity changes the stellar radius. We fit models to Palomar Double Spectrograph (DBSP) optical spectra to derive effective temperatures ($T_\mathrm{eff}$) and we measure bolometric luminosities ($L_\mathrm{bol}$) by combining broad wavelength-coverage photometry with Gaia parallaxes. Radii are then computed by combining the $T_\mathrm{eff}$ and $L_\mathrm{bol}$ using the Stefan-Boltzman law. We find that for a given temperature, ultra-subdwarfs can be as much as five times smaller than their solar-metallicity counterparts. We present color-radius and color-surface brightness relations that extend down to [Fe/H] of $-$2.0 dex, in order to aid the radius determination of M subdwarfs, which will be especially important for the WFIRST exoplanetary microlensing survey., Comment: Accepted to AJ
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Exoplanetary searches with gravitational microlensing: Polarization issues
- Author
-
Zakharov, Alexander F, Ingrosso, Gabriele, De Paolis, Francesco, Nucita, Achille A, Strafella, Francesco, Calchi Novati, Sebastiano, Jetzer, Philippe, Zakharov, Alexander F, Ingrosso, Gabriele, De Paolis, Francesco, Nucita, Achille A, Strafella, Francesco, Calchi Novati, Sebastiano, and Jetzer, Philippe
- Abstract
There are different methods for finding exoplanets such as radial spectral shifts, astrometrical measurements, transits, timing etc. Gravitational microlensing (including pixel-lensing) is among the most promising techniques with the potentiality of detecting Earth-like planets at distances about a few astronomical units from their host star or near the so-called snow line with a temperature in the range 0-100 °C on a solid surface of an exoplanet. We emphasize the importance of polarization measurements which can help to resolve degeneracies in theoretical models. In particular, the polarization angle could give additional information about the relative position of the lens with respect to the source.
- Published
- 2014
11. Spitzer Microlensing Parallax Reveals Two Isolated Stars in the Galactic Bulge
- Author
-
Zang, Weicheng, Shvartzvald, Yossi, Wang, Tianshu, Udalski, Andrzej, Lee, Chung-Uk, Sumi, Takahiro, Skottfelt, Jesper, Li, Shun-Sheng, Mao, Shude, Zhu, Wei, Yee, Jennifer C., Calchi Novati, Sebastiano, Beichman, Charles A., Bryden, Geoffery, Carey, Sean, Gaudi, B. Scott, Henderson, Calen B., Mróz, Przemek, Skowron, Jan, Poleski, Radoslaw, Szymański, Michał K., Soszyński, Igor, Pietrukowicz, Paweł, Kozłowski, Szymon, Ulaczyk, Krzysztof, Rybicki, Krzysztof A., Iwanek, Patryk, Bachelet, Etienne, Christie, Grant, Green, Jonathan, Hennerley, Steve, Maoz, Dan, Natusch, Tim, Pogge, Richard W., Street, Rachel A., Tsapras, Yiannis, Albrow, Michael D., Chung, Sun-Ju, Gould, Andrew, Han, Cheongho, Hwang, Kyu-Ha, Jung, Youn Kil, Ryu, Yoon-Hyun, Shin, In-Gu, Cha, Sang-Mok, Kim, Dong-Jin, Kim, Hyoun-Woo, Kim, Seung-Lee, Lee, Dong-Joo, Lee, Yongseok, Park, Byeong-Gon, Bond, Ian A., Abe, Fumio, Barry, Richard, Bennett, David P., Bhattacharya, Aparna, Donachie, Martin, Fukui, Akihiko, Hirao, Yuki, Itow, Yoshitaka, Kondo, Iona, Koshimoto, Naoki, Alex Li, Man Cheung, Matsubara, Yutaka, Muraki, Yasushi, Miyazaki, Shota, Nagakane, Masayuki, Ranc, Clément, Rattenbury, Nicholas J., Suematsu, Haruno, Sullivan, Denis J., Suzuki, Daisuke, Tristram, Paul J., Yonehara, Atsunori, Dominik, Martin, Hundertmark, Markus, Jørgensen, Uffe G., Rahvar, Sohrab, Sajadian, Sedighe, Snodgrass, Colin, Bozza, Valerio, Burgdorf, Martin J., Evans, Daniel F., Jaimes, R. Figuera, Fujii, Yuri I., Mancini, Luigi, Longa-Peña, Penelope, Helling, Christiane, Peixinho, Nuno, Rabus, Markus, Southworth, John, Unda-Sanzana, Eduardo, Essen, Carolina von, Zang, Weicheng, Shvartzvald, Yossi, Wang, Tianshu, Udalski, Andrzej, Lee, Chung-Uk, Sumi, Takahiro, Skottfelt, Jesper, Li, Shun-Sheng, Mao, Shude, Zhu, Wei, Yee, Jennifer C., Calchi Novati, Sebastiano, Beichman, Charles A., Bryden, Geoffery, Carey, Sean, Gaudi, B. Scott, Henderson, Calen B., Mróz, Przemek, Skowron, Jan, Poleski, Radoslaw, Szymański, Michał K., Soszyński, Igor, Pietrukowicz, Paweł, Kozłowski, Szymon, Ulaczyk, Krzysztof, Rybicki, Krzysztof A., Iwanek, Patryk, Bachelet, Etienne, Christie, Grant, Green, Jonathan, Hennerley, Steve, Maoz, Dan, Natusch, Tim, Pogge, Richard W., Street, Rachel A., Tsapras, Yiannis, Albrow, Michael D., Chung, Sun-Ju, Gould, Andrew, Han, Cheongho, Hwang, Kyu-Ha, Jung, Youn Kil, Ryu, Yoon-Hyun, Shin, In-Gu, Cha, Sang-Mok, Kim, Dong-Jin, Kim, Hyoun-Woo, Kim, Seung-Lee, Lee, Dong-Joo, Lee, Yongseok, Park, Byeong-Gon, Bond, Ian A., Abe, Fumio, Barry, Richard, Bennett, David P., Bhattacharya, Aparna, Donachie, Martin, Fukui, Akihiko, Hirao, Yuki, Itow, Yoshitaka, Kondo, Iona, Koshimoto, Naoki, Alex Li, Man Cheung, Matsubara, Yutaka, Muraki, Yasushi, Miyazaki, Shota, Nagakane, Masayuki, Ranc, Clément, Rattenbury, Nicholas J., Suematsu, Haruno, Sullivan, Denis J., Suzuki, Daisuke, Tristram, Paul J., Yonehara, Atsunori, Dominik, Martin, Hundertmark, Markus, Jørgensen, Uffe G., Rahvar, Sohrab, Sajadian, Sedighe, Snodgrass, Colin, Bozza, Valerio, Burgdorf, Martin J., Evans, Daniel F., Jaimes, R. Figuera, Fujii, Yuri I., Mancini, Luigi, Longa-Peña, Penelope, Helling, Christiane, Peixinho, Nuno, Rabus, Markus, Southworth, John, Unda-Sanzana, Eduardo, and Essen, Carolina von
- Abstract
We report the mass and distance measurements of two single-lens events from the 2017 $\textit {Spitzer}$ microlensing campaign. The ground-based observations yield the detection of finite-source effects, and the microlens parallaxes are derived from the joint analysis of ground-based observations and $\textit {Spitzer}$ observations. We find that the lens of OGLE-2017-BLG-1254 is a 0.60 ± 0.03 M ⊙ star with D LS = 0.53 ± 0.11 kpc, where D LS is the distance between the lens and the source. The second event, OGLE-2017-BLG-1161, is subject to the known satellite parallax degeneracy, and thus is either a ${0.51}_{-0.10}^{+0.12}\,{M}_{\odot }$ star with D LS = 0.40 ± 0.12 kpc or a ${0.38}_{-0.12}^{+0.13}\,{M}_{\odot }$ star with D LS = 0.53 ± 0.19 kpc. Both of the lenses are therefore isolated stars in the Galactic bulge. By comparing the mass and distance distributions of the eight published $\textit {Spitzer}$ finite-source events with the expectations from a Galactic model, we find that the $\textit {Spitzer}$ sample is in agreement with the probability of finite-source effects occurring in single-lens events.
12. Spitzer Microlensing Parallax Reveals Two Isolated Stars in the Galactic Bulge
- Author
-
Zang, Weicheng, Shvartzvald, Yossi, Wang, Tianshu, Udalski, Andrzej, Lee, Chung-Uk, Sumi, Takahiro, Skottfelt, Jesper, Li, Shun-Sheng, Mao, Shude, Zhu, Wei, Yee, Jennifer C., Calchi Novati, Sebastiano, Beichman, Charles A., Bryden, Geoffery, Carey, Sean, Gaudi, B. Scott, Henderson, Calen B., Mróz, Przemek, Skowron, Jan, Poleski, Radoslaw, Szymański, Michał K., Soszyński, Igor, Pietrukowicz, Paweł, Kozłowski, Szymon, Ulaczyk, Krzysztof, Rybicki, Krzysztof A., Iwanek, Patryk, Bachelet, Etienne, Christie, Grant, Green, Jonathan, Hennerley, Steve, Maoz, Dan, Natusch, Tim, Pogge, Richard W., Street, Rachel A., Tsapras, Yiannis, Albrow, Michael D., Chung, Sun-Ju, Gould, Andrew, Han, Cheongho, Hwang, Kyu-Ha, Jung, Youn Kil, Ryu, Yoon-Hyun, Shin, In-Gu, Cha, Sang-Mok, Kim, Dong-Jin, Kim, Hyoun-Woo, Kim, Seung-Lee, Lee, Dong-Joo, Lee, Yongseok, Park, Byeong-Gon, Bond, Ian A., Abe, Fumio, Barry, Richard, Bennett, David P., Bhattacharya, Aparna, Donachie, Martin, Fukui, Akihiko, Hirao, Yuki, Itow, Yoshitaka, Kondo, Iona, Koshimoto, Naoki, Alex Li, Man Cheung, Matsubara, Yutaka, Muraki, Yasushi, Miyazaki, Shota, Nagakane, Masayuki, Ranc, Clément, Rattenbury, Nicholas J., Suematsu, Haruno, Sullivan, Denis J., Suzuki, Daisuke, Tristram, Paul J., Yonehara, Atsunori, Dominik, Martin, Hundertmark, Markus, Jørgensen, Uffe G., Rahvar, Sohrab, Sajadian, Sedighe, Snodgrass, Colin, Bozza, Valerio, Burgdorf, Martin J., Evans, Daniel F., Jaimes, R. Figuera, Fujii, Yuri I., Mancini, Luigi, Longa-Peña, Penelope, Helling, Christiane, Peixinho, Nuno, Rabus, Markus, Southworth, John, Unda-Sanzana, Eduardo, Essen, Carolina von, Zang, Weicheng, Shvartzvald, Yossi, Wang, Tianshu, Udalski, Andrzej, Lee, Chung-Uk, Sumi, Takahiro, Skottfelt, Jesper, Li, Shun-Sheng, Mao, Shude, Zhu, Wei, Yee, Jennifer C., Calchi Novati, Sebastiano, Beichman, Charles A., Bryden, Geoffery, Carey, Sean, Gaudi, B. Scott, Henderson, Calen B., Mróz, Przemek, Skowron, Jan, Poleski, Radoslaw, Szymański, Michał K., Soszyński, Igor, Pietrukowicz, Paweł, Kozłowski, Szymon, Ulaczyk, Krzysztof, Rybicki, Krzysztof A., Iwanek, Patryk, Bachelet, Etienne, Christie, Grant, Green, Jonathan, Hennerley, Steve, Maoz, Dan, Natusch, Tim, Pogge, Richard W., Street, Rachel A., Tsapras, Yiannis, Albrow, Michael D., Chung, Sun-Ju, Gould, Andrew, Han, Cheongho, Hwang, Kyu-Ha, Jung, Youn Kil, Ryu, Yoon-Hyun, Shin, In-Gu, Cha, Sang-Mok, Kim, Dong-Jin, Kim, Hyoun-Woo, Kim, Seung-Lee, Lee, Dong-Joo, Lee, Yongseok, Park, Byeong-Gon, Bond, Ian A., Abe, Fumio, Barry, Richard, Bennett, David P., Bhattacharya, Aparna, Donachie, Martin, Fukui, Akihiko, Hirao, Yuki, Itow, Yoshitaka, Kondo, Iona, Koshimoto, Naoki, Alex Li, Man Cheung, Matsubara, Yutaka, Muraki, Yasushi, Miyazaki, Shota, Nagakane, Masayuki, Ranc, Clément, Rattenbury, Nicholas J., Suematsu, Haruno, Sullivan, Denis J., Suzuki, Daisuke, Tristram, Paul J., Yonehara, Atsunori, Dominik, Martin, Hundertmark, Markus, Jørgensen, Uffe G., Rahvar, Sohrab, Sajadian, Sedighe, Snodgrass, Colin, Bozza, Valerio, Burgdorf, Martin J., Evans, Daniel F., Jaimes, R. Figuera, Fujii, Yuri I., Mancini, Luigi, Longa-Peña, Penelope, Helling, Christiane, Peixinho, Nuno, Rabus, Markus, Southworth, John, Unda-Sanzana, Eduardo, and Essen, Carolina von
- Abstract
We report the mass and distance measurements of two single-lens events from the 2017 $\textit {Spitzer}$ microlensing campaign. The ground-based observations yield the detection of finite-source effects, and the microlens parallaxes are derived from the joint analysis of ground-based observations and $\textit {Spitzer}$ observations. We find that the lens of OGLE-2017-BLG-1254 is a 0.60 ± 0.03 M ⊙ star with D LS = 0.53 ± 0.11 kpc, where D LS is the distance between the lens and the source. The second event, OGLE-2017-BLG-1161, is subject to the known satellite parallax degeneracy, and thus is either a ${0.51}_{-0.10}^{+0.12}\,{M}_{\odot }$ star with D LS = 0.40 ± 0.12 kpc or a ${0.38}_{-0.12}^{+0.13}\,{M}_{\odot }$ star with D LS = 0.53 ± 0.19 kpc. Both of the lenses are therefore isolated stars in the Galactic bulge. By comparing the mass and distance distributions of the eight published $\textit {Spitzer}$ finite-source events with the expectations from a Galactic model, we find that the $\textit {Spitzer}$ sample is in agreement with the probability of finite-source effects occurring in single-lens events.
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.