Search

Determination of microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair (MMR) status in cancer has several clinical implications. Our aim was to integrate MSI/MMR status from patients tested in Greece to assess the prevalence of MSI-high (MSI-H)/deficient MMR (dMMR) per tumor type, testing patterns over time and concordance between MSI and MMR status. We retrospectively recorded MSI/MMR testing data of patients with diverse tumor types performed in pathology and molecular diagnostics laboratories across Greece. Overall, 18 of 22 pathology and/or molecular diagnostics laboratories accepted our invitation to participate. In the 18 laboratories located across the country, 7916 tumor samples were evaluated for MSI/MMR status. MSI/MMR testing significantly increased in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and other tumor types overtime ( p < 0.05). The highest prevalence was reported in endometrial cancer (47 of 225 patients, 20.9%). MSI-H/dMMR was observed in most tumor types, even in low proportions. Among 904 tumors assessed both for MSI and MMR status, 21 had discordant results (overall discordance rate, 2.3%). We reported MSI-H/dMMR prevalence rates in patients with diverse cancers, while demonstrating increasing referral patterns from medical oncologists in the country overtime. The anticipated high rate of concordance between MSI and MMR status in paired analysis was confirmed.

Our aim was to evaluate the concordance between the Myriad MyChoice and two alternative homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) assays (AmoyDx HRD Focus NGS Panel and OncoScan™) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Tissue samples from 50 patients with newly diagnosed EOC and known Myriad MyChoice HRD status were included. DNA aliquots from tumor samples, previously evaluated with Myriad MyChoice and centrally reassessed, were distributed to laboratories to assess their HRD status using the two platforms, after being blinded for the Myriad MyChoice CDx HRD status. The primary endpoint was the concordance between Myriad MyChoice and each alternative assay. Tumor samples were evaluated with an AmoyDx ® HRD Focus Panel ( n = 50) and with OncoScan™ ( n = 43). Both platforms provided results for all tumors. Analysis showed that correlation was high for the Myriad MyChoice GI score and AmoyDx ® HRD Focus Panel (r = 0.79) or OncoScan™ (r = 0.87) (continuous variable). The overall percent agreement (OPA) between Myriad MyChoice GI status (categorical variable) and each alternative assay was 83.3% (68.6-93.3%) with AmoyDx and 77.5% (61.5-89.2%) with OncoScan™. The OPA in HRD status between Myriad MyChoice and AmoyDx was 88.6% (75.4-96.2). False-positive rates were 31.6% (6/19) for AmoyDx GI status and 31.9% (7/22) for OncoScan™, while false-negative rates were 0% (0/28, AmoyDx) and 11.1% (2/18, OncoScan™) compared with the Myriad MyChoice GI status. While substantial concordance between Myriad MyChoice and alternative assays was demonstrated, prospective validation of the analytical performance and clinical relevance of these assays is warranted.

The current state of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is an equilibrium between expanding vaccine coverage on the one hand, and emergence of variants of concern which compromise vaccine effectiveness and enhance viral transmission on the other. Inequity in vaccine distribution, primarily an ethical issue, challenges this equilibrium, as industrialized countries prepare to administer a third booster dose to their population. Solid tumor cancer patients typically respond well to initial full vaccination and someone could argue that they should not be prioritized for an adjuvant third dose, since protection from severe disease has largely been achieved with the two-dose regimen. Nevertheless, their immune status is dynamic and not all of them exhibit an adequate immune response. A booster third dose is necessary for the inadequate responders, while it will result in better protection of all patients from mild disease as well, which if presented could have ominous consequences due to their overall frailty, and their need to adhere to strict therapeutic schemes. International scientific and public health communities should develop approaches that allow for wide immediate vaccination coverage of the developing world, in parallel with administration of adjuvant doses to solid tumor cancer patients (and other at-risk categories) of the developed nations, in order to avoid prolonging the pandemic, which will be prospectively against cancer patients' best interest., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The advanced lung cancer inflammation index [ALI: body mass index × serum albumin/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)] reflects systemic host inflammation, and is easily reproducible. We hypothesized that ALI could assist guidance of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)., Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included 672 stage IV NSCLC patients treated with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors alone or in combination with chemotherapy in 25 centers in Greece and Germany, and a control cohort of 444 stage IV NSCLC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy without subsequent targeted or immunotherapy drugs. The association of clinical outcomes with biomarkers was analyzed with Cox regression models, including cross-validation by calculation of the Harrell's C-index., Results: High ALI values (>18) were significantly associated with longer overall survival (OS) for patients receiving ICI monotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.402, P < 0.0001, n = 460], but not chemo-immunotherapy (HR = 0.624, P = 0.111, n = 212). Similar positive correlations for ALI were observed for objective response rate (36% versus 24%, P = 0.008) and time-on-treatment (HR = 0.52, P < 0.001), in case of ICI monotherapy only. In the control cohort of chemotherapy, the association between ALI and OS was weaker (HR = 0.694, P = 0.0002), and showed a significant interaction with the type of treatment (ICI monotherapy versus chemotherapy, P < 0.0001) upon combined analysis of the two cohorts. In multivariate analysis, ALI had a stronger predictive effect than NLR, PD-L1 tumor proportion score, lung immune prognostic index, and EPSILoN scores. Among patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥50% receiving first-line ICI monotherapy, a high ALI score >18 identified a subset with longer OS and time-on-treatment (median 35 and 16 months, respectively), similar to these under chemo-immunotherapy., Conclusions: The ALI score is a powerful prognostic and predictive biomarker for patients with advanced NSCLC treated with PD-L1 inhibitors alone, but not in combination with chemotherapy. Its association with outcomes appears to be stronger than that of other widely used parameters. For PD-L1-high patients, an ALI score >18 could assist the selection of cases that do not need addition of chemotherapy., Competing Interests: Disclosure GM reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Takeda, Pfizer, Amgen, and Merck outside from the submitted work. ES reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Amgen, and Merck outside from the submitted work. EZ reports advisory/consultation fees from MSD and Roche outside from the submitted work. KS reports advisory/consultation fees from MSD and Roche outside from the submitted work. SA reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Takeda, Pfizer, Amgen, and Merck outside from the submitted work. SB reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Takeda, Pfizer, and Amgen outside from the submitted work. IA reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Amgen, and Merck outside from the submitted work. AC reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, and Amgen outside from the submitted work. GP reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Amgen, and Merck outside from the submitted work. EL reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD, and Pfizer outside from the submitted work. HL reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Amgen, and Merck outside from the submitted work. PK reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Amgen, and Merck outside from the submitted work. AP reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Amgen, and Merck outside from the submitted work. CA reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Amgen, and Merck outside from the submitted work. EF reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Amgen, and Merck outside from the submitted work. FJH reports advisory board fees and honoraria from Lilly, Roche, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer, Chiesi, Teva, Pulmonx BTG, and Olympus, as well as research funding from Lilly, Roche, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer, Chiesi, and Teva, outside of the submitted work. CE reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Amgen, and Merck outside from the submitted work. GO reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, and MSD outside from the submitted work. TM reports research funding from Roche and patents with Roche, outside from the submitted work. ZS reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Amgen, and Merck outside from the submitted work. ER reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, and Amgen outside from the submitted work. AS reports advisory board honoraria from BMS, AstraZeneca, ThermoFisher, Novartis, speaker's honoraria from BMS, Illumina, AstraZeneca, Novartis, ThermoFisher, MSD, Roche, and research funding from Chugai, outside from the submitted work. IB reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, and Amgen outside from the submitted work. MR reports personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Samsung, outside the submitted work. KS reports advisory/consultation fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, and MSD. MT reports advisory board honoraria from Novartis, Lilly, BMS, MSD, Roche, Celgene, Takeda, AbbVie, Boehringer, speaker's honoraria from Lilly, MSD, Takeda, research funding from AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Novartis, Roche, and travel grants from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Boehringer, outside from the submitted work. PC reports research funding from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, and advisory board/lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Data on the effectiveness and safety of approved SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in cancer patients are limited. This observational, prospective cohort study investigated the humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in 232 cancer patients from 12 HeCOG-affiliated oncology departments compared to 100 healthcare volunteers without known active cancer. The seropositivity rate was measured 2-4 weeks after two vaccine doses, by evaluating neutralising antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein using a commercially available immunoassay. Seropositivity was defined as ≥33.8 Binding-Antibody-Units (BAU)/mL. A total of 189 patients and 99 controls were eligible for this analysis. Among patients, 171 (90.5%) were seropositive after two vaccine doses, compared to 98% of controls ( p = 0.015). Most seronegative patients were males (66.7%), >70-years-old (55.5%), with comorbidities (61.1%), and on active treatment (88.9%). The median antibody titers among patients were significantly lower than those of the controls (523 vs. 2050 BAU/mL; p < 0.001). The rate of protective titers was 54.5% in patients vs. 97% in controls ( p < 0.001). Seropositivity rates and IgG titers in controls did not differ for any studied factor. In cancer patients, higher antibody titers were observed in never-smokers ( p = 0.006), women ( p = 0.022), <50-year-olds ( p = 0.004), PS 0 ( p = 0.029), and in breast or ovarian vs. other cancers. Adverse events were comparable to registration trials. In this cohort study, although the seropositivity rate after two vaccine doses in cancer patients seemed satisfactory, their antibody titers were significantly lower than in controls. Monitoring of responses and further elucidation of the clinical factors that affect immunity could guide adaptations of vaccine strategies for vulnerable subgroups.

Our aim was to determine the prevalence, prognostic and predictive role of germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LPVs) in cancer predisposing genes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Germline testing of 62 cancer susceptibility genes was performed on unselected patients diagnosed from 02/2003 to 01/2020 with PDAC, treated at Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG)-affiliated Centers. The main endpoints were prevalence of P/LPVs and overall survival (OS). P/LPVs in PDAC-associated and homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes were identified in 22 (4.0%) and 42 (7.7%) of 549 patients, respectively. P/LPVs were identified in 16 genes, including ATM (11, 2.0%) and BRCA2 (6, 1.1%), while 19 patients (3.5%) were heterozygotes for MUTYH P/LPVs and 9 (1.6%) carried the low-risk allele, CHEK2 p.(Ile157Thr). Patients carrying P/LPVs had improved OS compared to non-carriers (22.6 vs. 13.9 months, p = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, there was a trend for improved OS in P/LPV carriers ( p = 0.063). The interaction term between platinum exposure and mutational status of HRR genes was not significant ( p -value = 0.35). A significant proportion of patients with PDAC carries clinically relevant germline P/LPVs, irrespectively of age, family history or disease stage. The predictive role of these P/LPVs has yet to be defined. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03982446.

Background: We evaluated real-world clinical outcomes and toxicity data and assessed treatment-related costs in patients with advanced breast cancer who received treatment with cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKi)., Patients and Methods: We conducted a prospective-retrospective analysis of patients with advanced hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer who received a CDKi, in combination with endocrine therapy, at any line of treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Cost analysis was conducted from a public third-payer (National Organization for Healthcare Services Provision (EOPYY)) perspective, assessing only costs related to direct medical care, including drug therapy costs and adverse drug reaction (ADR)-related costs., Results: From July 2015 to October 2019, 365 women received endocrine therapy combined with CDKi; median age was 61 years, postmenopausal 290 (80.6%) patients. CDKi were administered as first-line treatment in 149 (40.9%) patients, second-line treatment in 96 (26.4%) and third-line treatment and beyond in 119 (32.7%) patients. The most common adverse events were neutropenia, anaemia, thrombocytopenia and fatigue. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 86 (23.6%) patients, whereas 8 (2.2%) patients permanently discontinued treatment due to toxicity. The median PFS for patients who received CDKi as first-line, second-line and third-line treatment and beyond was 18.7, 12 and 7.4 months, respectively. The median overall survival since the initiation of CDKi treatment was 29.9 months (95% CI: 23.0-not yet reached (NR)). The mean pharmaceutical therapy cost estimated per cycle was 2 724.12 € for each patient, whereas the main driver of the ADR-related costs was haematological adverse events., Conclusions: Treatment with CDKi was well tolerated, with a low drug discontinuation rate. Patients who received CDKi as first-line treatment had improved PFS and OS compared with second-line treatment and beyond. The main component of direct medical costs assessed in the cost analysis comprises CDKi pharmaceutical therapy costs., Trial Registration Number: NCT04133207., Competing Interests: Competing interests: EF: stock ownership: GENPREX INC, ARIAD and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Travel grant: Merck, Pfizer and K.A.M Oncology/Hematology. Advisory: LEO Pharma. Speaker fees: Roche and Pfizer. AV: advisory boards: Angelini and Takeda. Speaker fees: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche and MSD. Training programmes: Astellas, Genesis Pharma, Pfizer, LEO, Abbvie and TEVAAN. Travel fees: Pfizer, Merck, Hospira, Sanofi, Roche, Astra Zeneca, Kyowa Kirin-Anabiosis and Rafarm. AB: advisory role and honorarium: Pfizer and Novartis. SK: consultation/advisory: Astra Zeneca and Roche. Research: Novartis and Roche. Speaker: Astra Zeneca, Novartis and Roche. IB: advisory board: Pfizer and Novartis. Educational grant: Pfizer. Research Fund: Novartis and Lilly. AN: advisory board and speaker fees: Pfizer and Novartis. GA: advisory boards: Novartis, BMS, Roche Hellas, Astra Zeneca, Sanofi, Amgen, Genesis Pharma, Merck and Pfizer. AP: consultation fees: Amgen, Merck Serono, Roche, BMS, Astra Zeneca and MSD. Honoraria: Amgen, Merck Serono, Roche, BMS, Astra Zeneca and MSD. Research funds: BMS and Kura. AK: advisory role: Genesis Pharma. Honoraria: Pfizer. Speaker’s bureau: Roche. Research funding: Merck. Travel: MSD. Educational grants: Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Roche, BMS, MSD, Genesis and Ipsen. GM: honoraria/consultancy: Astra Zeneca, Roche, Pfizer, BMS, MSD, Takeda, Boehringer, Merck, Novartis and Amgen. Travel fees: Astra Zeneca, Roche, Pfizer, BMS, MSD, Takeda, Boehringer, Merck, Novartis, Astellas and Pierre Fabre. ER: consulting or advisory role: Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer. Research funding: Novartis, Demo Pharmaceutical, EORTC, Radius Pharmaceuticals, Tesaro, Parexel and Anabiosis Pharmaceuticals. Travel: Sanofi, Ipsen, Genesis Pharmaceuticals, LEO Pharma, Merck, Roche and Genekor. GF: advisory board: Pfizer, Sanofi and Roche. Honoraria: Astra Zeneca. Stock ownership: ARIAD and GENPREX. The rest of the authors declare no conflict of interest., (© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

The purpose of the current study is to investigate the prognostic significance of M2 isoform of pyruvate kinase (PKM2) mRNA expression loss in patients with operable colon cancer (CC). Two hundred sixty-two specimens from patients with stage-III or high-risk stage-II CC (group-A) treated with adjuvant fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy (FOLFOX), 118 specimens from metastatic CC patients (group-B) treated with FOLFOX, and 104 metastatic CC patients (group-C) treated with irinotecan-based chemotherapy were analyzed for PKM2, TS, ERCC1, MYC , and NEDD9 mRNA expression, as well as KRAS exon2 and BRAF V600E mutations. High PKM2 mRNA expression was correlated with left-sided located primaries ( p = 0.001, group-A; p = 0.003, group-B; p = 0.001, group-C), high-grade tumors ( p = 0.001, group-A; p = 0.017, group-B; p = 0.021, group-C), microsatellite-stable tumors ( p < 0.001, group-A), pericolic lymph nodes involvement ( p = 0.018, group-A), and cMYC mRNA expression ( p = 0.002, group-A; p = 0.008, group-B; p = 0.006, group-C). High PKM2 mRNA expression was correlated with significantly lower disease free survival (DFS) ( p = 0.002) and overall survival (OS) ( p = 0.001) in the group-A. Similarly, PKM2 mRNA expression was associated with significantly decreased progression free survival (PFS) ( p = 0.001) and OS ( p = 0.001) in group-B. On the contrary, no significant association for the PKM2 mRNA expression has been observed with either PFS ( p = 0.612) or OS ( p = 0.517) in group-C. To conclude, the current study provides evidence for the prediction of PKM2 mRNA expression oxaliplatin-based treatment resistance.

Background/aim: Early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) carries a wide range of survival probabilities. Novel biomarkers in this setting are eagerly awaited. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are considered one of the reasons for treatment failure. This study sought to determine whether activation of pathways governing the function of CSC's could correlate with treatment outcomes., Materials and Methods: Tumor specimens from 325 patients were analyzed with immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Hedgehog and Notch pathway activation and results were correlated with prognosis., Results: Positive Notch3 protein expression was an unfavorable prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (HR=2.43, p=0.024 and HR=2.56, p=0.028, respectively). Activation of the Shh pathway showed univariately longer DFS (HR=0.49, p=0.032). Possible crosstalk between the two pathways was indicated. No further associations between pathway activation and outcome were evident., Conclusion: Apart from Notch 3, activation of the pathways, as indicated by IHC expression of their components, did not result in differences in terms of DFS or OS., (Copyright© 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

The plants of the Colchicum family were known during the archaic period in Greece for their deleterious properties. Later on, they were used for the treatment of podagra. The treatment was introduced by the ancient Greek physicians and passed on to the Byzantine and Arabian physicians to endure until nowadays. The first plant was most probably named "Medea" from the notorious Colchican witch. As the most common member of the family blossoms in autumn, the plant was named Colchicum autumnale. Various nominations were also used, such as Ephemeron, Hermodactyl, Anima articulorum and Surugen. Our article discusses them, while at the same time presents the most notable authorities who have used Colchicum plants in herbal medicine and toxicology., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.org.)

To evaluate the predictive value of genes involved in resistance to platinum-taxane chemotherapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Microdissected formalin-fixed tumoral samples from 187 EOC patients' primary tumors (90 and 97 samples from matched patients in the experimental and validation sets, respectively) were analyzed. All specimens were analyzed for ATP7b, BRCA1, BRCA2, PARP1, UIMC1(RAP80), HOXA9, DAXX, TXN (TRX1), THBS1 (TSP1) and PRR13 (TXR1) mRNA expression by quantitative real-time PCR. Most of the patients (172 out of 187) received front-line carboplatin-paclitaxel regimen. Expression levels were correlated with overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival by multivariate analysis. Patients with high TXN and THBS1 expression presented longer PFS (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively) and OS (P=0.024 and P<0.001, respectively). High TXR1 expression was associated with decreased PFS (P<0.001) and OS (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that high PRR13/low THBS1 expression was an independent factor for decreased PFS (hazards ratio: 1.94; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.48-2.92; P=0.008) and OS (hazard ratio: 3.89; 95% CI: 2.16-6.87; P<0.001), whereas low TXN expression was correlated with decreased PFS (hazard ratio: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.05-2.84; P=0.043) and OS (hazard ratio: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.78-2.77; P=0.009). These findings indicate that PRR13/THBS1 and TXN expression could be used for the prediction of resistance to treatment of EOC patients and, therefore, merit to be further evaluated.

Purpose: SMAD4 loss is associated with the development of metastases and poor prognosis. We evaluated expression of SMAD4 protein and its association with tumor characteristics, including biomarkers and outcome in terms of relapse-free survival and overall survival., Experimental Design: We used 1,564 stage II/III colon cancer samples from PETACC-3 to evaluate SMAD4 expression by immunohistochemistry. SMAD4 protein expression was validated by assessing mRNA expression using available expression array data. SMAD4 expression was also studied on 34 adenomas and 10 colon cancer liver metastases with their primaries. Loss of SMAD4 immunoreactivity was defined as focal or diffuse. Cases without SMAD4 loss were subdivided into those with strong and weak expression., Results: SMAD4 protein expression was informative in 1,381/1,564 cases. SMAD4 loss was found in 293/1,381 (21%) cases. Of 1,088 cases without SMAD4 loss (79%), 530 showed weak and 558 strong expression. SMAD4 loss occurred also in adenomas, but less extensively than in carcinomas. Liver metastases followed mostly the expression pattern of the primary tumor. SMAD4 loss, including weak expression, identified patients with poor survival in stage II as well as III and in both treatment arms. SMAD4 loss was less frequent in tumors with microsatellite instability and more frequent in those with loss of heterozygosity of 18q., Conclusions: We conclude that clonal loss of SMAD4 expression in adenomas, carcinomas, and liver metastases increases with disease progression. SMAD4 loss, and to a lesser extent weak expression, is strongly associated with poor survival regardless of stage. Clin Cancer Res; 22(12); 3037-47. ©2016 AACR., (©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: An everyday clinical practice dilemma in the 20-30% of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients that have not been operated on their primary tumour, is, under which specific histopathology and molecular circumstances, an endoscopic biopsy could be considered adequate to provide a representative RAS/BRAF molecular status to guide treatment., Methods: A consecutive series of 193 paired biopsy and primary CRC tumour samples between August 2008 and 2010 available in the Department of Pathology archives, University Hospitals, KU Leuven were retrieved. For a pair to be included, in the endoscopic biopsy, 20% of invasive adenocarcinoma cells should be present and enough slides to yield an extracted DNA concentration of ⩾5 ng μl(-1), and no <2 ng μl(-1) should be available for cutting. Exons 2-4 KRAS/NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA molecular evaluation was performed with RT-PCR and Sequenom., Results: From 165 deemed adequate by the pathologist pairs, 85 (51.5%) were concordantly mutated in at least one of the tested genes, 70 (42.5%) were wt and 10 (6%) were discordant, harbouring a mutation in the primary and not in the endoscopic biopsy. In the re-evaluation, when more slides were cut per discordant pair, mutational status changed in two of the six discordantly KRAS-mutated pairs. A strong strength of agreement for both runs was observed (Cohen's kappa, k=0.877, P<0.001 and k=0.901, P<0.001, respectively) between the surgically acquired and the endoscopic biopsy specimens' evaluation., Conclusions: Based on our results, an endoscopic biopsy could provide an accurate mutational profile and become a justified alternative to a surgically removed primary tumour specimen, as long as specific histopathology criteria are met.

In the 11(th) and 12(th) century the Western caliphate flourished, making Cordoba the capital of physicians and philosophers. During that period lived and practised the famous physician Ibn Zuhr or Avenzoar. In his monumental treatise Al Taysir, Avenzoar provided the first clinical description of a polypoid colorectal tumour as well as the case of a uterine cancer and a basal cell carcinoma. His medical work remained popular through middle ages, influencing the development of western medicine.

Introduction: We conducted a feasibility study on docetaxel/capecitabine/cisplatin (DCX) with chemoradiotherapy as adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer patients., Methods: Patients were scheduled to receive 2 cycles of DCX, followed by 50.4 Gy plus capecitabine as radiotherapy, followed by an additional 2-DCX cycles., Results: From the 40 enrolled patients, 26 (65%) completed treatment as per protocol and 14 (35%) discontinued with the treatment (patients' refusal: n=6; adverse events: n=8). There were 2 toxic deaths. Grade >3 toxicity was 12.1% before and 13.3% after chemoradiotherapy. Disease progression was documented in 11 (27.5%) patients., Conclusions: No further development of this regimen is justified on the basis of poor tolerability in patients.

Background: Although colon cancer (CC) with microsatellite instability (MSI) has a more favorable prognosis than microsatellite stable (MSS) CC, the impact varies according to clinicopathological parameters. We studied how MSI status affects prognosis in a trial-based cohort of stage II and III CC patients treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin or FOLFIRI., Materials and Methods: Tissue specimens of 1254 patients were tested for 10 different loci and were classified as MSI-high (MSI-H) when three or more loci were unstable and MSS otherwise. Study end points were overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS)., Results: In stage II, RFS and OS were better for patients with MSI-H than with MSS CC [hazard ratio (HR) 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.65, P = 0.004 and 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.64, P = 0.01). In stage III, RFS was slightly better for patients with MSI-H CC (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.99, P = 0.04), but the difference was not statistically significant for OS (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.44-1.09, P = 0.11). Outcomes for patients with MSI-H CC were not different between the two treatment arms. RFS was better for patients with MSI-H than with MSS CC in the right and left colon, whereas for OS this was significant only in the right colon. For patients with KRAS- and BRAF-mutated CC, but not for double wild-type patients, RFS and OS were significantly better when the tumors were also MSI-H. An interaction test was statistically significant for KRAS and MSI status (P = 0.005), but not for BRAF status (P = 0.14)., Conclusions: Our results confirm that for patients with stage II CC but less so for those with stage III MSI-H is strongly prognostic for RFS and OS. In the presence of 5-FU treatment, stage II patients with MSI-H tumors maintain their survival advantage in comparison with MSS patients and adding irinotecan has no added benefit. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00026273., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

In 19th century, the anatomo-clinical school of Paris linked clinical signs with anatomical lesions establishing clinical medicine. One of the most enlightened promoters of this method was the French physician René-Théophile-Hyacinthe Laennec, known as the inventor of stethoscope. In our article, we reveal his work on pulmonary melanoma.

Purpose: An inherited mutation in KRAS (LCS6-variant or rs61764370) results in altered control of the KRAS oncogene. We studied this biomarker's correlation to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer., Experimental Design: LCS6-variant and KRAS/BRAF mutational status was determined in 512 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with salvage anti-EGFR mAb therapy, and findings correlated with outcome. Reporters were tested in colon cancer cell lines to evaluate the differential response of the LCS6-variant allele to therapy exposure., Results: In this study, 21.2% (109 of 512) of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer had the LCS6-variant (TG/GG), which was found twice as frequently in the BRAF-mutated versus the wild-type (WT) group (P=0.03). LCS6-variant patients had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) with anti-EGFR mAb monotherapy treatment in the whole cohort (16.85 vs. 7.85 weeks; P=0.019) and in the double WT (KRAS and BRAF) patient population (18 vs. 10.4 weeks; P=0.039). Combination therapy (mAbs plus chemotherapy) led to improved PFS and overall survival (OS) for nonvariant patients, and brought their outcome to levels comparable with LCS6-variant patients receiving anti-EGFR mAb monotherapy. Combination therapy did not lead to improved PFS or OS for LCS6-variant patients. Cell line studies confirmed a unique response of the LCS6-variant allele to both anti-EGFR mAb monotherapy and chemotherapy., Conclusions: LCS6-variant patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have an excellent response to anti-EGFR mAb monotherapy, without any benefit from the addition of chemotherapy. These findings further confirm the importance of this mutation as a biomarker of anti-EGFR mAb response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, and warrant further prospective confirmation., (©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Expression of ERCC1 has not been well described in fine-needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated the expression of ERCC1 in correlation with EGFR expression and clinicopathological factors in patients with NSCLC in order to determine if these play a role in the prognosis of the disease., Methods: We studied 45 patients, 34 with adenocarcinoma and 11 with squamous cell carcinoma. Of these 45 patients, 35 were males and 10 females, aged between 45 and 83 years, 30 smokers and 15 non-smokers. Eighteen (18) tumors were of stage I, twelve (12) stage II and fifteen (15) stage III. To investigate the expression of ERCC1 and EGFR (scores 0, 1, 2, 3), immunocytochemistry was performed on air dried specimens (FNABs) using monoclonal antibodies by alkaline-phosphatase (APAAP) method., Results: ERCC1 expression was detected in tumors from 27 patients (60%) and EGFR in 10 patients (22.2%). ERCC1 was expressed more frequently in males (65.7%) in patients >65 years old (64%), in smokers (66.7%) and in stage I (66.7%). Negative ERCC1 expression was significantly associated with the presence of EGFR. EGFR was expressed only in adenocarcinomas and more frequently in women (70%) and non smokers (53.3%)., Conclusions: ERCC1 expression was identified as positive (scores 2+ and 3+) in the majority of NSCLCs and seems to be an independent prognostic marker of longer survival. In addition EGFR expression was positive (scores 2+ and 3+) in the minority of NSCLCs and only in adenocarcinomas, more frequently in ERCC1-negative (scores 0 and 1+) tumors, suggesting that it is not an independent prognostic marker for the outcome of the patients suffering from NSCLC., (Copyright © 2013 Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia. Published by Elsevier España. All rights reserved.)

In colon cancer, classic disease staging remains the key prognosis and treatment determinant. Although adjuvant chemotherapy has an established role in stage III colon cancer patients, in stage II it is still a subject of controversy due to its restriction to a small subgroup of patients with high-risk histopathologic features. Patients with stage II tumors form a highly heterogeneous group, with five-year relative overall survival rates ranging from 87.5% (IIA) to 58.4% (IIC). Identifying those for whom adjuvant chemotherapy would be appropriate and necessary has been challenging, and prognostic markers which could serve in the selection of patients more likely to recur or benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy are eagerly needed. The stronger candidate in this category seems to be microsatellite instability (MSI). The recently reported European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines suggest that MSI should be evaluated in stage II colorectal cancer patients in order to contribute in treatment decision-making regarding chemotherapy administration. The hypothetical predictive role of MSI regarding its response to 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy has proven a much more difficult issue to address. Almost every possible relation between MSI and chemotherapy outcome has been described in the adjuvant colon cancer setting in the international literature, and the matter is far from being settled. In this current report we critically evaluate the prognostic and predictive impact of MSI status in patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer patients.

Background: To prospectively evaluate the usefulness of the BRAFV600E mutation detection in daily clinical practice in patients with metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC)., Patients and Methods: 504 mCRC patients treated with systemic chemotherapy ± biologics were analyzed., Results: A statistically significant higher incidence of the BRAF mutation was observed in patients with ECOG-PS 2 (p=0.001), multiple metastatic sites (p=0.002),> 65 years old (p=0.004), primary tumors located in the colon (p<0.001), high-grade tumors (p=0.001) and in those with mucinous features (p=0.037). Patients with BRAFV600E mutated tumors had a statistically significantly reduced progression-free survival (PFS) compared to wild-type (wt) ones (4.1 and 11.6 months, respectively; p<0.001) and overall survival (OS) (14.0 vs. 34.6 months, respectively; p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis the BRAFV600E mutation emerged as an independent factor associated with reduced PFS (HR: 4.1, 95% CI 2.7-6.2; p<0.001) and OS (HR: 5.9, 95% CI 3.7-9.5; p<0.001). Among the 273 patients treated with salvage cetuximab or panitumumab, the BRAFV600E mutation was correlated with reduced PFS (2.2 vs. 6.0 months; p<0.0001) and OS (4.3 vs. 17.4 months; p<0.0001)., Conclusions: The presence of BRAFV600E-mutation in mCRC characterizes a subgroup of patients with distinct biologic, clinical and pathological features and is associated with very poor patients' prognosis.

In 1872, the Hungarian born dermatologist Moriz Kaposi that was practicing in Vienna first described a rare endemic disease that bears his name, among elderly persons of Central European or Mediterranean origin named "idiopathic multiple pigmented sarcoma of the skin". Ten years later the Italian dermatologist Tommaso de Amicis confirms Kaposi's findings. For more than a century the disease was known as a rare low grade malignancy till the 1980s AIDS epidemic.

At the beginning of the 20th century, Professor Jean-Louis Faure, one of the leading surgeons of the innovative Parisian Medical School, published an exhaustive work on uterine cancer. He was the first to perform in France the procedure of total abdominal hysterectomy by median section of the uterus contributing to the evolution of cancer surgery.

Background: We conducted an open-label, pilot phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)., Methods: Thirty patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC, <70 years and with performance status 0-1 were included in the trial., Results: Complete and partial responses were observed in 4 (13.3%) and 17 (56.7%) patients, respectively (overall response rate (ORR)=70%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 53.6%-86.4%); 8 patients (26.7%) had stable disease and 1 had progressive disease. The median time to tumour progression was 10.2 months (95% CI: 7.1-13.4) and the overall median survival time was 30.3 months (95% CI: 18.8-41.9). Secondary R0 resection was performed in 11 (37%) patients. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea and neutropenia were observed in 16 (53%) and 7 (23.3%) patients, respectively, and febrile neutropenia observed in 2 (6.6%) patients. Neurotoxicity grade 2 or 3 was reported in 7 (23.3%) and in 2 (6.7%) patients, respectively, and grade 3 rush was reported in 1 patient., Conclusion: The FOLFOXIRI/cetuximab combination presented increased activity in terms of response rate and R0 secondary liver metastases resection, and merits further investigation, especially in patients with initially unresectable disease confined to the liver.

The diagnosis of metastatic cancer in peritoneal fluid is of great importance for the patient and the attending physician. A cytopathologist's responsibility is twofold: (1) to accurately identify malignant cells; (2) to interpret tumor type and if possible the site of its origin even in the absence of complete clinical history of other clues. The difficulty in the diagnosis of metastatic neoplasms in peritoneal fluid is due to 2 factors: (1) abnormal mesothelial cells or macrophages may simulate cancer cells, or may conceal tumor cells; and (2) peritoneal fluid constitutes a natural and hitherto inadequately explored medium of cell culture, in which neoplastic cells may proliferate free of the boundaries imposed upon them by the framework of organs and tissues. Immunocytochemistry (ICC) and molecular techniques are essential to establish an accurate diagnosis. From a great many points of view malignant peritoneal fluid is suitable for continuous study of cancer cells, thus providing knowledge about biologic aspects of human solid tumors.

Purpose: To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of oral metronomic vinorelbine with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC)., Patients and Methods: Escalated doses of oral metronomic vinorelbine (starting dose 30 mg) every other day continuously and capecitabine (starting dose 800 mg/m(2) bid) on days 1-14 every 21 days were administered. DLTs were evaluated during the first cycle., Results: Thirty-six women were enrolled at eight escalating dose levels. For twenty-four patients, treatment was first line, for eight second line, and for four third line. The DLT level was reached at oral metronomic vinorelbine 70 mg and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2), and the recommended MTD doses are vinorelbine 60 mg and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2). DLTs were febrile neutropenia grade 3 and 4, diarrhea grade 4, and treatment delays due to unresolved neutropenia. There was no treatment-related death. The main toxicities were grade 2-3 neutropenia in 16.6% of patients each, grade 2-3 anemia 16.5%, grade 2-4 fatigue 27.5%, grade 2-3 nausea/vomiting 11%, and grade 3-4 diarrhea 8.2%. Two complete and 10 partial responses were documented., Conclusion: Oral metronomic vinorelbine with capecitabine is a well-tolerated and feasible regimen that merits further evaluation in MBC.

The name Aretaeus of Cappadocia has been linked with diabetes more than that of any other physician of antiquity, his texts forming a sophisticated synthesis of the previous knowledge on this disease copiously supplemented by his own observations. Gifted with a unique faculty for observing pathologic phenomena, he was able to elaborate upon earlier texts enriching them with his own original findings and numerous thoughtful reflections. Among the many diseases he dealt with, Aretaeus has bequeathed to us an outstandingly vivid and accurate description of diabetes.

Purpose: Continuous administration of oral vinorelbine, given 3 times a week (metronomic), is feasible and exceptionally well tolerated at doses up to 50 mg with clinical activity against refractory tumors. In this phase II study oral metronomic vinorelbine and bevacizumab were evaluated as salvage therapy in women with pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC)., Methods: Patients received oral vinorelbine (50 mg 3 times a week) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) biweekly in cycles of 28 days. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). A preplanned analysis was performed when the first 13 patients were evaluated for tumor response., Results: One patient (7.7%) achieved partial response (PR) and 6 (46.1%) stable disease (SD). The combination was very well tolerated but, as per protocol, the study was closed prematurely due to lack of efficacy., Conclusion: The combination of oral metronomic vinorelbine and bevacizumab has good tolerance but minimal activity in terms of objective responses in pretreated patients with MBC.

Purpose: This study evaluates the activity and toxicity of the paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC) doublet versus vinorelbine/carboplatin (VC) doublet as second-line treatment in patients who have advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Treatment: Patients pretreated with front-line docetaxel and gemcitabine were randomized to receive either PC (n = 75), which consisted of paclitaxel at a dose of 140 mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC3), or VC (n = 78), which consisted of vinorelbine at a dose of 45 mg/m(2) orally and carboplatin AUC3; both drugs were administered on days 1 and 15., Results: The overall response rate was 18.6% (95% confidence interval, 9.85%-27.49%; one complete and 13 partial responses) in the PC arm and 7.7% (95% confidence interval, 1.78%-13.61%; one complete and five partial responses) in the VC arm (P = .056). Median time to tumor progression was 3.5 months (range, 0.3 - 23.73 months) and 3.07 months (range, 0.37-18.5) in the PC and VC arm, respectively (P = .287). Median overall survival was 7.83 months (range, 0.3-45.03 months) and 7.60 months (range, 0.5-30.27 months) for PC and VC arms, respectively (P value = .633). Chemotherapy was well-tolerated and grade III/IV toxicities were relatively infrequent. No toxic deaths were observed., Conclusions: Platinum-based doublets with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC pretreated with front-line docetaxel/gemcitabine show comparable efficacy when used in the second-line setting., (Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: To investigate the predictive significance of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutational status, AREG- EREG mRNA expression, PTEN protein expression and skin rash in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with cetuximab containing salvage chemotherapy., Methods: Primary tumors from 112 mCRC patients were analyzed. The worst skin toxicity during treatment was recorded., Results: KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations were present in 37 (33%), 8 (7.2%) and 11 (9.8%) cases, respectively, PTEN was lost in 21 (19.8%) cases, AREG and EREG were overexpressed in 48 (45%) and 51 (49%) cases. In the whole study population, time to tumor progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) was significantly lower in patients with KRAS (p = 0.001 and p = 0.026, respectively) or BRAF (p = 0.001 and p<0.0001, respectively) mutant tumors, downregulation of AREG (p = 0.018 and p = 0.013, respectively) or EREG (p = 0.002 and p = 0.004, respectively) and grade 0-1 skin rash (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001, respectively). In KRAS wt patients TTP and OS was significantly lower in patients with BRAF (p = 0.0001 and p<0.0001, respectively) mutant tumors, downregulation of AREG (p = 0.021 and p = 0.004, respectively) or EREG (p = 0.0001 and p<0.0001, respectively) and grade 0-1 skin rash (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001, respectively). TTP was significantly lower in patients with PIK3CA mutations (p = 0.01) or lost PTEN (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed KRAS (Hazard Ratio [HR] 4.3, p<0.0001), BRAF mutation (HR: 5.1, p<0.0001), EREG low expression (HR: 1.6, p = 0.021) and absence of severe/moderate skin rash (HR: 4.0, p<0.0001) as independent prognostic factors for decreased TTP. Similarly, KRAS (HR 2.9, p = 0.01), BRAF mutation (HR: 3.0, p = 0.001), EREG low expression (HR: 1.7, p = 0.021), absence of severe/moderate skin rash (HR: 3.7, p<0.0001) and the presence of undifferantited tumours (HR: 2.2, p = 0.001) were revealed as independent prognostic factors for decreased OS., Conclusions: These results underscore that KRAS-BRAF mutations and EREG expression can be used as biomarkers to further select patients undergoing anti-EGFR treatment.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical relevance of circulating CEACAM5mRNA-positive cells in patients with operable colorectal cancer (CRC)., Methods: Peripheral blood was obtained from 265 patients with operable CRC before the initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy from 96 normal donors and RNA prepared from the Lovo and ARH-77 CRC and leukemic cell lines, respectively, was used as positive and negative controls. The detection of CEACAM5mRNA-positive cells was done using a real-time PCR assay. The association with known prognostic factors and the effect of CEACAM5mRNA-positive cells on patients' prognosis was investigated., Results: The analytical detection limit of the method was found to correspond to 0.7 Lovo cell equivalence/5 μg RNA, with a sensitivity of 1 tumor cell/10(5) normal cells and a specificity of 97%. Ninety-eight (37%) patients had detectable circulating CEACAM5mRNA-positive cells. Detection of CEACAM5mRNA-positive cells was significantly associated with higher relapse rate (P < 0.001), decreased disease-free survival (DFS; P < 0.001), higher death rate (P = 0.017), and decreased median overall survival (P = 0.025). Multivariate analysis revealed that the detection of circulating CEACAM5mRNA-positive cells was an independent prognostic factor for decreased DFS [HR = 3.4; 95% CI: 2.0-5.9; P < 0.001]., Conclusions: Detection of peripheral blood CEACAM5mRNA-positive cells is an adverse prognostic factor correlated with poor clinical outcome in patients with operable CRC., (©2010 AACR.)

Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy represents the standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) while non-platinum-based regimens are frequently administered in patients with relapse. A retrospective analysis of the sequence administration of these regimens in the first- and second-line setting was performed., Patients and Methods: The records of patients enrolled in the Hellenic Oncology Research Groups's randomized advanced NSCLC trials from February 1997 to September 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. The efficacy of non-platinum-based chemotherapy administered as first- or second-line treatment (n=94, cohort A) was compared to that of non-platinum-based first-line followed by platinum-based second-line chemotherapy (n=267, cohort B), and the reverse sequence (n=123, cohort C)., Results: The objective response rate (ORR) to first-line chemotherapy was higher in cohort C compared to cohort A (45.5% vs. 25.5%, respectively, p=0.002) and cohort B (45.5% vs. 21.3%, p=0.0001). The ORR to second-line therapy was 17%, 13.1% (p=0.349) and 7.3% (p=0.027) in cohorts A, B and C, respectively. Time to progression and the overall survival were comparable among the three cohorts in both first- and second line therapy., Conclusion: Platinum-based first-line chemotherapy improved response rate compared to non-platinum-based regimens; however, the overall survival was comparable, irrespective of the sequence administration of these regimens is the first- and second-line setting.

Background: The significance of BRAF mutations, microsatelite instability (MSI) status and cyclin D1 expression in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was evaluated., Methods: Primary tumours from 144 patients treated for mCRC were assessed for BRAF (V600E) mutation, MSI status and cyclin D1. The data were correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: BRAF mutations were detected in 10 (out of 22, 45%) patients with MSI-H tumours compared with 2 (out of 122, 1.6%) in those with microsatellite stable tumours (P<0.001). The presence of BRAF mutations was correlated with cyclin D1 overexpression (7 out of 26 patients, 58% vs 5 out of 118 patients, 14%; P=0.001). Patients with BRAF-mutated primary tumours had a significantly decreased PFS (2.7 vs 9.8 months; P<0.001) and median OS (14 vs 30 months; P<0.001) than patients with wild-type (wt) tumours. Patients with MSI-H and BRAF-mutated tumours experienced significantly lower PFS (3.1 vs 11.4 months; P=0.008) and OS (14.5 vs 35.5 months; P=0.004) than patients with MSI-H and BRAF wt tumours. Similarly, BRAF mutations and cyclin D1 overexpression were correlated with decreased PFS (3.1 vs 8.6 months; P=0.03) and OS (17.8 vs 39.2 months; P=0.01)., Conclusion: BRAF V600E mutations are associated with MSI-H status and cyclin D1 overexpression and characterize a subgroup of patients with poor prognosis.

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) continues to be counted as a major health problem. The introduction of newer cytotoxics, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, has achieved a significant improvement in survival rates. Novel targeted therapies (bevacizumab, and cetuximab) in combination with most efficient chemotherapy regimens have pushed the median survival beyond the 2-year mark and increased the proportion of patients which could benefit from resection of metastatic lesions. In addition, several studies have proved that the CRC mutation profiles should influence patient selection or stratification in prospective trials. KRAS mutational status represents a paradigm for biomarker development in the era of molecular targeted therapies. The present article is an overview of the most important studies in the development of biomarkers for the optimization of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) treatment in mCRC, beyond KRAS mutations, which is a work in progress. The aim will be to identify molecular markers that might be used to select patients with a higher probability of response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Overall the accumulating evidence of the molecular biology of CRC has substantially changed the approach to mCRC treatment and has given clinicians more rational options for treating this illness.

The CD44(+)/CD24(-/low) and ALDH1(+) cell phenotypes are associated with stemness and enhanced tumorigenic potential in breast cancer. We assessed the expression of CD44, CD24 and ALDH1 on tumor cells circulating in the peripheral blood (CTCs) of patients with metastatic breast cancer using triple-marker immunofluorescence microscopy. Among a total of 1439 CTCs identified in 20 (66.7%) out of 30 patients, 35.2% had the stem-like/tumorigenic phenotype CD44(+)/CD24(-/low), whereas 17.7% of the CTCs analyzed in seven patients, were ALDH1(high)/CD24(-/low). In conclusion, we report the existence of a subpopulation of CTCs with putative stem cell progenitor phenotypes in patients with metastatic breast cancer., (Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of the paclitaxel, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin combination administered biweekly in patients with advanced solid tumors., Patients and Methods: Patients received escalated doses of paclitaxel (starting dose: 100 mg/m(2)), gemcitabine (starting dose: 800 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (starting dose: 50 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 15 in cycles of every 4 weeks. DLTs were evaluated during the first cycle., Results: Twenty-seven patients (median age 65 years) with performance status 0-1 were treated on six dose escalation levels. Eleven patients (40.7%) were chemotherapy naïve, six (22.2%) had received 1 prior chemotherapy regimen and ten (37.1%) 2 or more. The DLT level was reached at the doses of paclitaxel 110 mg/m(2), gemcitabine 1,150 mg/m(2) and LOHP 70 mg/m(2). The dose-limiting events were grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Neutropenia was the most common adverse event. A median of 3 cycles per patient was administered. One complete and five partial responses were observed in patients with ovarian carcinoma, NSCLC, urothelial cancer, mesothelioma and cancer of unknown primary. No pharmacokinetic drug interactions were detected., Conclusions: The recommended doses for future phase II studies of this combination are paclitaxel 110 mg/m(2), gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin 70 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks. The regimen is generally well tolerated and merits further evaluation.

Background: We address the prognostic and predictive value of KRAS, PIK3CA and BRAF mutations for clinical outcomes in response to active agents in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)., Methods: We determined KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in tumours from 168 patients treated for mCRC at two institutions. All patients received 5-FU-based first-line chemotherapy and treatment outcome was analysed retrospectively., Results: KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations were present in 62 (37%), 13 (8%) and 26 (15%) cases, respectively. Multivariate analysis uncovered BRAF mutation as an independent prognostic factor for decreased survival (hazard ratio (HR) 4.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-7.6). In addition, patients with BRAF-mutant tumours had significantly lower progression-free survival (PFS: HR 4.0, 95% CI 2.2-7.4) than those whose tumors that carried wild-type BRAF. Among 92 patients treated using chemotherapy and cetuximab as salvage therapy, KRAS mutation was associated with lack of response (P=0.002) and shorter PFS (P=0.09). BRAF (P=0.0005) and PIK3CA (P=0.01) mutations also predicted reduced PFS in response to cetuximab salvage therapy., Conclusions: These results underscore the potential of mutational profiling to identify CRCs with different natural histories or treatment responses. The adverse significance of BRAF mutation should inform patient selection and stratification in clinical trials.

Purpose: Temozolomide, a novel triazene derivative, has shown activity in vitro against lung cancer as well as against brain metastases from a variety of solid tumors including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of temozolomide in pretreated patients with NSCLC., Patients and Methods: Thirty-one pretreated patients (median age 60 years) with histologically confirmed NSCLC were enrolled. Sixteen (52%) patients had a performance status (ECOG) of 0-1, 12 (39%) had pretreated brain metastases and 28 (90.3%) had received >2 lines of treatment. Temozolomide was administered at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) daily for 21 days every 28 days. A total of 73 chemotherapy cycles were administered., Results: In an intention-to-treat analysis, 2 patients (6.5%; 95% CI: -2.2 to 15.1%) achieved a partial response and 3 (10%) stable disease. The median time to progression was 2.4 months, the median survival time 3.3 months and the 1-year survival rate 22.5%. There was a toxic death due to grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 and 4 lymphopenia occurred in 4 (13%) and 2 (6%) patients, respectively. Nonhematological toxicity was mild, consisting of grade 2-3 asthenia (n = 14 patients) and grade 3 diarrhea (n = 1 patient)., Conclusion: Prolonged low daily doses of temozolomide demonstrate minimal activity as salvage therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. The combination of low daily doses of temozolomide with other anticancer drugs probably merits further evaluation.

Purpose: To determine the tolerability and efficacy of the combination of gefitinib with gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes., Patients and Methods: Women with measurable MBC pretreated with anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy received oral gefitinib (250 mg/day) continuously combined with intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on day 1, every 2 weeks. The first 10 enrolled patients were evaluated for the safety and tolerability of the proposed fixed-dose regimen., Results: The study was discontinued prematurely due to low accrual. Twenty-five (71%) of the originally scheduled 35 patients received a total of 154 chemotherapy cycles. All the patients had previously received taxane- and 72% additionally anthracycline-based chemotherapy and 64% of them had progressive disease as best response to first-line treatment. Three episodes of dose-limiting toxicities (one non-febrile neutropenia grade 4 and two non-neutropenic infections grade 3) were observed in the safety analysis of the first 10 patients. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate was 12% (95% CI, 0-24.7%), the median time to tumour progression was 3.5 months (range 1.0-11.5) and the median overall survival was 10.4 months (range 1.0-46.0). The main toxicity was hematological, with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurring in 6 (24%) and 4 (16%) patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 2 (8.0%) patients., Conclusion: Although well tolerated, the gefitinib plus gemcitabine and vinorelbine regimen achieved a low response rate in this prematurely terminated trial and therefore cannot be recommended for women with pretreated MBC.

Purpose: To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of weekly high dose 5-fluorouracil (5FU) continuous infusion and leukovorin (LV) alternatively combined with oxaliplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced tumors of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract., Patients and Methods: Patients received a fixed dose of LV (500 mg/m(2)) over 2 h infusion on weeks 1 to 4 and escalated doses of: oxaliplatin (starting dose 65 mg/m(2): 120 min i.v. infusion on weeks 1 and 3); irinotecan (starting dose 80 mg/m(2); 90 min i.v. infusion on weeks 2 and 4) and 5FU (starting dose 1500 mg/m(2); 22 h continuous i.v. infusion, on weeks 1 to 4), in cycles of 5 weeks. DLTs were evaluated during the fi rst cycle., Results: Twenty-eight patients were treated on 8 dose levels and all but two patients received the regimen at least as second-line treatment. The DLT level was reached at the oxaliplatin dose of 90 mg/m(2), irinotecan dose of 110 mg/m(2), LV dose of 500 mg/m(2) and 5FU dose of 1750 mg/m(2); the recommended MTDs were 85 mg/m(2) for oxaliplatin, 110 mg/m(2) for irinotecan, 1750 mg/m(2) for 5FU and 500 mg/m(2) for LV. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea and grade 3 nausea/vomiting were the dose-limiting events. Diarrhea was the most common toxicity of the regimen, occurring in 12 (42.8%) patients. Hematological toxicity was mild and there were no treatment- related deaths., Conclusion: This weekly regimen showed a favorable toxicity profile and merits further investigation in patients with advanced/metastatic tumors of the GI tract.

Purpose: To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum-tolerated doses of the paclitaxel, oxaliplatin (LOHP) and capecitabine combination in patients with advanced solid tumors., Patients and Methods: Patients received escalating doses of paclitaxel (starting dose 100 mg/m2) and LOHP (starting dose 40 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15 and capecitabine (starting dose 800 mg/m2/day) on days 1-7 and 15-21 every 28 days. DLTs were evaluated in the first cycle., Results: Sixteen patients were treated at four dose-escalating levels. Eleven (68.7%) patients had received two or more prior chemotherapy regimens. The DLT level was reached at paclitaxel 110 mg/m2, LOHP 50 mg/m2 and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2/day. DLTs due to grade 2-3 neutropenia resulted in treatment delays. No febrile neutropenia or treatment-related death occurred. Grade 2-3 neutropenia occurred in 3 (19%) patients each, grade 2-4 fatigue affected 6 (37.5%) patients, and grade 2-3 neurotoxicity was observed in 2 (12.5%) and 1 (6%) patients, respectively. Two partial responses and four disease stabilizations were achieved., Conclusion: The recommended doses for phase II studies are paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and LOHP 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2/day on days 1-7 and 15-21 every 4 weeks. This regimen is well tolerated and merits further evaluation., (Copyright 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Purpose: The study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) and identify the dose-limiting toxicities of the biweekly administration of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors., Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced malignancies were treated with escalated doses of gemcitabine and pemetrexed (starting doses 1,250 and 300 mg/m(2), respectively) both given on days 1 and 15 in cycles of 4 weeks., Results: Forty-one patients were treated at 7 dose levels. The MTD was reached at the dose of 1,750 mg/m(2) for gemcitabine and 450 mg/m(2) for pemetrexed. Dose-limiting events were grade IV neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and treatment delay due to grade III hematological toxicities. One partial response in a pretreated patient with ovarian cancer was observed, while 4 other patients experienced stable disease., Conclusions: The biweekly administration of gemcitabine plus pemetrexed at the recommended MTDs is safe, well tolerated and demonstrates antitumor activity which merits further evaluation in phase II studies., (Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: To evaluate the incidence of central nervous system (CNS) involvement in patients with breast cancer treated with a taxane-based chemotherapy regimen and to determine predictive factors for CNS relapse., Methods: The medical files of patients with early breast cancer (n = 253) or advanced stage breast cancer (n = 239) as well of those with other solid tumors (n = 336) treated with or without a taxane-based chemotherapy regimen during a 42-month period were reviewed. HER2/neu overexpression was identified by immunohistochemistry, whereas cytokeratin 19 (CK-19) mRNA-positive circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the peripheral blood were identified by real-time PCR., Results: The incidence of CNS relapse was similar in patients suffering from breast cancer or other solid tumors (10.4% and 11.4%, respectively; P = 0.517). The incidence of CNS relapse was significantly higher in breast cancer patients with advanced disease (P = 0.041), visceral disease and bone disease (P = 0.036), in those who were treated with a taxane-containing regimen (P = 0.024), in those with HER2/neu-overexpressing tumors (P = 0.022) and, finally, in those with detectable CK-19 mRNA-positive CTCs (P = 0.008). Multivariate analysis revealed that the stage of disease (odds ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.007-0.23; P = 0.0001), the HER2/neu status (odds ratio, 29.4; 95% confidence interval, 7.51-101.21; P = 0.0001) and the presence of CK-19 mRNA-positive CTCs (odds ratio, 8.31; 95% confidence interval, 3.97-12.84; P = 0.001) were independent predictive factors for CNS relapse., Conclusion: CNS relapses are common among breast cancer patients treated with a taxane-based chemotherapy regimen, patients with HER2/neu-positive tumor and patients with CK-19 mRNA-positive CTCs.

Background: Tumor angiogenesis is considered a multi-pathway process, while p21(WAF1/CiP1) is a CDK inhibitor involved in cell division and survivaL Herein the tumor environment effect on endothelial p21(WAF1/Cip1) expression is examined., Materials and Methods: The EA.hy 926 endothelial cell line and tumor-conditioned medium (TCM) from the MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cell line were used. Endothelial cells grown alone and in TCM were immunostained for p21(WAF1/Cip1) and analyzed by RT-PCR Forty-four cases of breast cancer and forty-three cases of normal breast tissue were immunostained for p21(WAF1/Cip1)., Results: Endothelial p21(WAF1/Cip1) is transcriptionally down-regulated under the influence of TCM. Moreover, it seems that breast cancer tumor endothelium does not express p21(WAF1/Cip1)., Conclusion: P21(WAF1/Cip1) plays a major role in angiogenesis, since tumor cells seem to down-regulate endothelial p21(WAF1/Cip1), compared to endothelial cells grown in serum-free medium. The verification of the tissue culture experiment results by immunohistochemistry on tissue sections indicates p21(WAF1/Cip1) as a target of modern molecular therapy.

Purpose: To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of L-OHP plus 5-FU and LV in patients with advanced solid malignancies., Patients and Methods: Patients received escalated doses of L-OHP (starting dose 50 mg/m2) as a 2-hour IV infusion on Days 1 and 15, and LV (500 mg/m2 as a 2-hour IV infusion) followed by escalated doses of 5FU (starting dose 1,800 mg/m2) as a 22-hour continuous IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, 21 every 6 weeks. DLTs were evaluated in the first cycle., Results: Fifty-two patients [median age: 66 years; PS (ECOG) 0-1 in 90 percent] were treated on 12 dose-levels. Five (10 percent) patients had received 2 prior chemotherapy regimens, 24 (46 percent) one, and 23 (44 percent) were chemo-naïve. The DLT was reached at the dose of LOHP 100 mg/m2 and 5FU 2,200 mg/m2. Dose-limiting events were G3 diarrhea, G3 asthenia, G4 neutropenia, and G4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in 6 (12 percent) patients and Grade 3 fatigue in 6 (12 percent). One (2 percent) patient developed Grade 4 neutropenia and another (2 percent) Grade 4 thrombocytopenia., Conclusion: The MTD were L-OHP 95 mg/m2 on d1 and d15 and 5FU 2,200 mg/m2/week for 4 consecutive weeks every 6 weeks.

Purpose: To determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the weekly administration of docetaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PEG-LD) in patients with advanced solid tumors., Patients and Methods: Forty-eight patients with solid tumors were enrolled in the study. Dose escalations of both drugs were given on a weekly basis for 3 consecutive weeks in cycles of 4 weeks. The starting dose for docetaxel was 20 mg/m(2)/week and for PEG-LD 6 mg/m(2)/week., Results: The MTD was 35 mg/m(2)/week for docetaxel and 14 mg/m(2)/week for PEG-LD. The DLTs at this level were grade 3 diarrhea (n=1 patient) and grade 3 mucositis (n=2 patients). There was no grade 4 hematologic or non-hematologic toxicity. Grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred only in 1 and 2 patients, respectively. The non-hematologic toxicity was also mild with grade 2/3 fatigue in 8 patients, grade 2/3 neurotoxicity in 4, grade 2/3 mucositis in 8, grade 2/3 diarrhea in 4 and grade 2/3 nausea and vomiting in 5 patients. Two (5.7%) complete and 6 (17%) partial responses (overall response rate=22.7%; 95% confidence interval 9.6--32.4%) were observed among 35 evaluable patients. In 12 (63%) of 19 patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, a decline in serum levels of prostate-specific antigen of >50% was observed., Conclusions: The weekly administration of docetaxel with PEG-LD is a well-tolerated regimen that merits further evaluation., (Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: To summarize current knowledge regarding the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal vasculitis., Methods: Three cases of gastrointestinal vasculitis with acute abdominal ischemia as their first manifestation are presented. Underlying diseases were microscopic polyangiitis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and polyarteritis nodosa (PAN). Relevant English-language articles collected from the PubMed database were reviewed., Results: Among the angiitides, PAN, SLE, and Henoch-Schönlein are those most commonly accompanied by gastrointestinal complications. Intestinal vasculitis usually occurs when there is evidence of generalized disease activity. Abdominal computerized tomography is a valuable tool for diagnosing intestinal ischemia and suspected vasculitis., Conclusions: In young patients presenting with intestinal ischemia, it is essential to assess the possibility of an underlying systemic disease. With prompt initiation of immunosuppressive treatment, surgery may be avoided. Prognosis is improved when there is minimal delay in surgical intervention.