Search

Background: Torsemide is proposed to have clinically important pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantages over furosemide. However, clinical outcomes did not differ in the Torsemide Comparison with Furosemide for Management of Heart Failure (TRANSFORM-HF) randomized trial., Methods: We conducted a multicenter mechanistic substudy of patients with heart failure randomized to oral furosemide or torsemide (TRANSFORM-Mechanism). At baseline and 30 days, participants underwent detailed assessments of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters., Results: TRANSFORM-Mechanism enrolled 88 participants. Kidney bioavailability, or the proportion of dose delivered to the tubular site of action, was significantly less with torsemide compared to furosemide [median 17.1%, (IQR 12.3, 23.5%) vs. 24.8% (16.6, 34.1%), p < 0.001]. Furosemide had a longer duration of kidney drug delivery and duration of natriuresis (p≤0.004 for both). Prescribed doses of furosemide and torsemide in TRANSFORM-Mechanism were similar to TRANSFORM-HF, with providers on average using a 2:1 dose equivalence conversion between drugs. However, these doses resulted in a substantially greater natriuresis with torsemide (p<0.001). A dose equivalence of ∼4:1 resulted in similar natriuresis. Higher diuretic doses in the torsemide group resulted in mild perturbations in kidney function and significant increases in renin, aldosterone, and norepinephrine (p<0.05 for all). Plasma volume (p=0.52) and body weight (p=0.89) did not improve with torsemide vs. furosemide., Conclusions: We observed no meaningful pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic advantages for torsemide vs. furosemide. The greater natriuresis from higher diuretic doses in the torsemide group was offset by greater neurohormonal activation and kidney dysfunction., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Diuresis to achieve decongestion is a central aim of therapy in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). While multiple approaches have been tried to achieve adequate decongestion rapidly while minimizing adverse effects, no single diuretic strategy has shown superiority, and there is a paucity of data and guidelines to utilize in making these decisions. Observational cohort studies have shown associations between urine sodium excretion and outcomes after hospitalization for ADHF. Urine chemistries (urine sodium ± urine creatinine) may guide diuretic titration during ADHF, and multiple randomized clinical trials have been designed to compare a strategy of urine chemistry-guided diuresis to usual care. This review will summarize current literature for diuretic monitoring and titration strategies, outline evidence gaps, and describe the recently completed and ongoing clinical trials to address these gaps in patients with ADHF with a particular focus on the utility of urine sodium-guided strategies., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of hospitalization in the United States. Decongestion remains a central goal of inpatient management, but contemporary decongestion practices and associated weight loss have not been well characterized nationally., Objectives: This study aimed to describe contemporary inpatient diuretic practices and clinical predictors of weight loss in patients hospitalized for HF., Methods: The authors identified HF hospitalizations from 2015 to 2022 in a U.S. national database aggregating deidentified patient-level electronic health record data across 31 geographically diverse community-based health systems. The authors report patient characteristics and inpatient weight change as a primary indicator of decongestion. Predictors of weight loss were evaluated using multivariable models. Temporal trends in inpatient diuretic practices, including augmented diuresis strategies such as adjunctive thiazides and continuous diuretic infusions, were assessed., Results: The study cohort included 262,673 HF admissions across 165,482 unique patients. The median inpatient weight loss was 5.3 pounds (Q1-Q3: 0.0-12.8 pounds) or 2.4 kg (Q1-Q3: 0.0-5.8 kg). Discharge weight was higher than admission weight in 20% of encounters. An increase of ≥0.3 mg/dL in serum creatinine from admission to inpatient peak occurred in >30% of hospitalizations and was associated with less weight loss. Adjunctive diuretic agents were utilized in <20% of encounters but were associated with greater weight loss., Conclusions: In a large-scale U.S. community-based cohort study of HF hospitalizations, estimated weight loss from inpatient decongestion remains highly variable, with weight gain observed across many admissions. Augmented diuresis strategies were infrequently used. Comparative effectiveness trials are needed to establish optimal strategies for inpatient decongestion for acute HF., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Zheng has served as a consultant for Reprieve Cardiovascular. Dr Ambrosy has received relevant research support through grants to his institution from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (number K23HL150159), the American Heart Association (Second Century Early Faculty Independence Award), The Permanente Medical Group, Northern California Community Benefits Programs, Garfield Memorial Fund, Abbott Laboratories, Amarin Pharma, Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Esperion Therapeutics, and Novartis. Dr Bhatt has received relevant research support through grants to his institution from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute on Aging, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and previously received consulting fees from Sanofi Pasteur. Dr Collins has received research support from the National Institutes of Health, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Department of Defense, and Beckman Coulter; and consulting fees from Abbott, Redesign Health, and Reprieve Cardiovascular, Inc. Dr Flint has received relevant grant funding from Abbott. Dr Fonarow has served as a consultant for Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Eli Lilly, Johnson and Johnson, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer. Dr Greene has received research support from the Duke University Department of Medicine Chair’s Research Award, American Heart Association (number 929502), Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; served on the advisory board or as a consultant for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, Corteria, CSL Vifor, Cytokinetics, Lexicon, Merck, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, scPharmaceuticals, Tricog Health, and Urovant Pharmaceuticals; and received speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Lexicon, and Roche Diagnostics. Dr Varshney has received consulting fees from Broadview Ventures. Dr Sandhu has received relevant research support from the National Heart, Lung, Blood Institute (number 1K23HL151672) and the American Heart Association; and served as a consultant for Reprieve Cardiovascular, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, and Cleerly. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The ATHENA-HF (Aldosterone Targeted Neurohormonal Combined with Natriuresis Therapy in Heart Failure) clinical trial found no improvements in natriuretic peptide levels or clinical congestion when spironolactone 100 mg/day for 96 hours was used in addition to usual treatment for acute heart failure., Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of ATHENA-HF to determine whether spironolactone treatment induced any detectable pharmacodynamic effects and whether patients with potentially greater aldosterone activity experienced additional decongestion. Trial subjects previously treated with spironolactone were excluded. We first examined for changes in renal potassium handling. Using the baseline serum potassium level as a surrogate marker of spironolactone activity, we then divided each treatment arm into tertiles of baseline serum potassium and explored for differences in laboratory and clinical congestion outcomes., Results: Among spironolactone-naïve patients, the change in serum potassium did not differ after 24 hours or 48 hours but was significantly greater with spironolactone treatment compared to placebo at 72 hours (0.23 ± 0.55 vs 0.03 ± 0.60 mEq/L; P = 0.042) and 96 hours (0.32 ± 0.51 vs 0.13 ± 0.72 mEq/L; P = 0.046). Potassium supplementation was similar at treatment start and at 24 hours, but spironolactone-treated patients required substantially less potassium replacement at 48 hours (24% vs 36%; P = 0.048), 72 hours (21% vs 37%; P = 0.013), and 96 hours (11% vs 38%; P < 0.001). When the treatment arms were divided into tertiles of baseline serum potassium, there were no differences in the 96-hour log N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, net fluid loss, urine output, or dyspnea relief in any of the potassium groups, with no effect modification by treatment exposure., Conclusions: Spironolactone 100 mg/day for 96 hours in patients receiving intravenous loop diuresis for acute heart failure has no clear added decongestive ability but does meaningfully limit potassium wasting., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Hypothesis: Volenrelaxin, is a half-life-extended recombinant human relaxin protein developed for improving kidney perfusion and cardiorenal function. This study assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of volenrelaxin following single- and multiple-ascending doses (SAD and MAD) administration., Methods: In this Phase 1, 4-part, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled SAD and MAD study in healthy participants, SAD participants (n = 56) received an intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) dose of volenrelaxin or placebo in a dose-ascending manner. MAD participants (n = 77) received volenrelaxin or placebo SC once weekly for 5 weeks. Effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) were determined by para-aminohippurate and iohexol clearance, respectively., Results: Volenrelaxin demonstrated an extended half-life and increased acute and chronic placebo-adjusted ERPF change from baseline by 50% and 44%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Measured GFR was unchanged, while filtration fraction and afferent/efferent renal arteriolar resistances were reduced. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures decreased, and pulse rate increased with increasing volenrelaxin exposures, demonstrating maximal model-derived placebo-adjusted changes (90% confidence interval) of -6.16 (-8.04, -4.28) mmHg, -6.10 (-7.61, -4.58) mmHg, and + 4.39 (3.38, 5.39) bpm, respectively. Adverse events were mild, with no difference in orthostatic hypotension between volenrelaxin and placebo., Conclusion: Volenrelaxin was well-tolerated, safe and suitable for weekly SC dosing. Volenrelaxin showed a sustained improvement in kidney perfusion upon repeated dosing, supporting further clinical development in chronic kidney disease and chronic heart failure. Clinical trial registration: NCT04768855., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Background: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) improve outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, MRAs are often underused because of hyperkalemia concerns., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess whether sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC), a nonabsorbed crystal that traps and rapidly lowers potassium, enables MRA use in patients with HFrEF and prevalent hyperkalemia (or at high risk)., Methods: REALIZE-K is a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with HFrEF (NYHA functional class II-IV; left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%), optimal therapy (except MRA), and prevalent hyperkalemia (or at high risk). During the open-label run-in, all participants underwent protocol-mandated spironolactone titration (target: 50 mg daily); those with prevalent (cohort 1) or incident (cohort 2) hyperkalemia during titration started SZC. Participants achieving normokalemia while on spironolactone ≥25 mg daily were randomized to continuing SZC or matching placebo for 6 months. The primary composite endpoint was proportion of participants with optimal response (normokalemia, on spironolactone ≥25 mg daily, no rescue for hyperkalemia [months 1-6])., Results: Of 365 patients (run-in), 202 were randomized. Baseline characteristics included mean age 70 years, prevalent comorbidities (78% estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , 38% atrial fibrillation/flutter), high N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (median 1,136 pg/mL), and high HFrEF therapy use (64% sacubitril/valsartan, 96% beta-blocker, 42% sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor). At randomization, 78% were receiving spironolactone 50 mg daily., Conclusions: REALIZE-K is the first trial to evaluate whether SZC can enable rapid and safe MRA optimization and long-term continuation in patients with HFrEF and prevalent/high risk of hyperkalemia. (Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of SZC for the Management of High Potassium in Patients with Symptomatic HFrEF Receiving Spironolactone; NCT04676646)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The REALIZE-K trial was funded by AstraZeneca. Drs Kosiborod, Cherney, Connelly, Desai, Guimarães, Kuthi, Lala, Madrini, Merkely, Villota, Squire, Testani, Vaclavik, Verma, Wranicz, and Petrie have received research funding in the form of grants to institutions from AstraZeneca and/or consulting for AstraZeneca. Mr Dahl, Mr Eudicone, and Ms Friberg are employees of, and hold or may hold stock in, AstraZeneca., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Loop diuretics may exacerbate cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) in heart failure (HF). Direct sodium removal (DSR) using the peritoneal membrane, in conjunction with complete diuretic withdrawal, may improve CRS and diuretic resistance., Methods and Results: Patients with HF requiring high-dose loop diuretics were enrolled in two prospective, single-arm studies: RED DESERT (n = 8 euvolaemic patients), and SAHARA (n = 10 hypervolaemic patients). Loop diuretics were withdrawn, and serial DSR was utilized to achieve and maintain euvolaemia. At baseline, participants required a median 240 mg (interquartile range [IQR] 200-400) oral furosemide equivalents/day, which was withdrawn in all participants during DSR (median time of DSR 4 weeks [IQR 4-6]). Diuretic response (queried by formal 40 mg intravenous furosemide challenge and 6 h urine sodium quantification) increased substantially from baseline (81 ± 37 mmol) to end of DSR (223 ± 71 mmol, p < 0.001). Median time to re-initiate diuretics was 87 days, and the median re-initiation dose was 8% (IQR 6-10%) of baseline. At 1 year, diuretic dose remained substantially below baseline (30 [IQR 7.5-40] mg furosemide equivalents/day). Multiple dimensions of kidney function such as filtration, uraemic toxin excretion, kidney injury, and electrolyte handling improved (p < 0.05 for all). HF-related biomarkers including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, carbohydrate antigen-125, soluble ST2, interleukin-6, and growth differentiation factor-15 (p < 0.003 for all) also improved., Conclusions: In patients with HF and diuretic resistance, serial DSR therapy with loop diuretic withdrawal was feasible and associated with substantial and persistent improvement in diuretic resistance and several cardiorenal parameters. If replicated in randomized controlled studies, DSR may represent a novel therapy for diuretic resistance and CRS., Clinical Trial Registration: RED DESERT (NCT04116034), SAHARA (NCT04882358)., (© 2024 European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the bidirectional relationship between kidney and cardiovascular (CV) events in trial participants with type 2 diabetes and CV disease., Methods and Results: Post hoc analyses of EMPA-REG OUTCOME using Cox regression models were performed to assess the association of baseline factors with risk of a kidney event and bidirectional associations of incident kidney events and CV events. Among placebo-treated participants, baseline factors significantly associated with greater kidney event risk included lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, albuminuria, higher uric acid, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and prior heart failure (HF). Coronary artery disease was not associated with increased risk. In placebo-treated participants, occurrence of an incident non-fatal kidney event increased the subsequent risk of hospitalization for HF (HHF) but not 3-point major adverse CV events (non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and CV death). Vice versa, HHF (but not myocardial infarction/stroke) increased the risk of subsequent kidney events. These associations were generally also seen in empagliflozin-treated participants and in the overall population. Interestingly, the risk of kidney events following HHF was not significantly increased in the relatively small number of placebo-treated participants already diagnosed with HF at baseline., Conclusions: These findings demonstrate a bidirectional inter-relationship between HHF and kidney events. Further exploration of this relationship and strategies to optimize the use of therapies to reduce both kidney and HF outcomes is warranted., (© 2023 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Importance: COVID-19 infection is associated with a high incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). Although rapid kidney function decline has been reported in the first few months after COVID-19-associated AKI (COVID-AKI), the longer-term association of COVID-AKI with kidney function remains unknown., Objective: To assess long-term kidney outcomes of patients who had COVID-19-associated AKI., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective longitudinal multicenter cohort study conducted in a large hospital system using electronic health records data on adult hospitalized patients with AKI and COVID-19 or other illnesses. Included patients were hospitalized during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020-June 2022), were screened for SARS-CoV-2, had AKI, and survived to discharge, or had been hospitalized during the 5 years before the pandemic (October 2016-January 2020), had a positive influenza A or B test result, had AKI, and survived to discharge. Patients were followed up for a maximum of 2 years after hospital discharge. Data analyses were performed from December 2022 to November 2023., Exposure: COVID-19 and influenza., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was major adverse kidney events (MAKE), defined as a composite of mortality and worsened kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] decline by ≥25% from discharge eGFR or kidney failure requiring dialysis). Multivariable time-to-event analyses were performed to compare MAKE between individuals with COVID-AKI and those who had AKI associated with other illnesses hospitalized during the same period. For further comparison, this outcome was assessed for a historic cohort of patients with influenza-associated AKI., Results: The study cohort included 9624 hospitalized patients (mean [SD] age, 69.0 [15.7] years; 4955 [51.5%] females) with AKI, including 987 patients with COVID-AKI, 276 with influenza-associated AKI, and 8361 with AKI associated with other illnesses (other-AKI). Compared with the other 2 groups, patients with COVID-19-associated AKI were slightly younger in age, had a higher baseline eGFR, worse baseline comorbidity scores, higher markers of illness severity, and longer hospital stay. Compared with the other-AKI group, the COVID-AKI group had lower MAKE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59-0.75) due to lower all-cause mortality (aHR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.24-0.39) and lower rates of worsened kidney function (aHR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.69-0.88)., Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this multicenter cohort study indicate that survivors of hospitalization with COVID-AKI experience lower rates of MAKE, long-term kidney function decline, and mortality compared with patients with AKI associated with other illnesses.

Implantable devices form an integral part of the management of patients with heart failure (HF) and provide adjunctive therapies in addition to cornerstone drug treatment. Although the number of these devices is growing, only few are supported by robust evidence. Current devices aim to improve haemodynamics, improve reverse remodelling, or provide electrical therapy. A number of these devices have guideline recommendations and some have been shown to improve outcomes such as cardiac resynchronization therapy, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and long-term mechanical support. For others, more evidence is still needed before large-scale implementation can be strongly advised. Of note, devices and drugs can work synergistically in HF as improved disease control with devices can allow for further optimization of drug therapy. Therefore, some devices might already be considered early in the disease trajectory of HF patients, while others might only be reserved for advanced HF. As such, device therapy should be integrated into HF care programmes. Unfortunately, implementation of devices, including those with the greatest evidence, in clinical care pathways is still suboptimal. This clinical consensus document of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) describes the physiological rationale behind device-provided therapy and also device-guided management, offers an overview of current implantable device options recommended by the guidelines and proposes a new integrated model of device therapy as a part of HF care., (© 2024 European Society of Cardiology.)

Background and Objectives: Approaches to distinguishing pathological cardiorenal dysfunction in heart failure (HF) from functional/hemodynamically mediated changes in serum creatinine are needed. We investigated urine galectin-3 as a candidate biomarker of renal fibrosis and a prognostic indicator of cardiorenal dysfunction phenotypes., Methods: We measured urine galectin-3 in 2 contemporary HF cohorts: the Yale Transitional Care Clinic (YTCC) cohort (n = 132) and the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial (n = 434). We assessed the association of urine galectin-3 with all-cause mortality in both cohorts and the association with an established marker of renal tissue fibrosis, urinary amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) in TOPCAT., Results: In the YTCC cohort, there was significant effect modification between higher urine galectin-3 and lower estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) (P interaction  = 0.046), such that low eGFR levels had minimal prognostic importance if urine galectin-3 levels were low, but they were important and indicated high risk if urine galectin-3 levels were high. Similar observations were noted in the TOPCAT study (P interaction  = 0.002). In TOPCAT, urine galectin-3 also positively correlated with urine PIIINP at both baseline (r = 0.43; P < 0.001) and at 12 months (r = 0.42; P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Urine galectin-3 levels correlated with an established biomarker of renal fibrosis in 2 cohorts and was able to differentiate high- vs low-risk phenotypes of chronic kidney disease in HF. These proof-of-concept results indicate that additional biomarker research to differentiate cardiorenal phenotypes is warranted., Competing Interests: Disclosures JMT reports grants and/or personal fees from 3ive labs, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Cardionomic, MagentaMed, Reprieve, FIRE1,W.L. Gore, Sanofi, Sequana Medical, Otsuka, Abbott, Merck, Windtree Therapeutics, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Precardia, Relypsa, Regeneron, BD, Edwards Life Sciences, and Lilly; he has a patent for treatment of diuretic resistance issued to Yale and Corvidia Therapeutics, a patent for methods of measuring renalase issued to Yale, and a patent for treatment of diuretic resistance pending with Reprieve. VSR has a patent for treatment of diuretic resistance, US20200079846A1, issued to Yale and Corvidia Therapeutics, with royalties paid to Yale University, VSR and JMT and a patent for measuring renalase WO2019133665A2 issued to Yale. VSR reports personal fees from Translational Catalyst. ZLC reports grants from AstraZeneca. JBIM reports personal fees from Astra-Zeneca, Boehringer Inglheim, Novartis, Merck, Moksha8, and Translational Catalyst. All other authors report no disclosures relevant to the content of this article., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Significance Statement: The effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on regional tubular sodium handling is poorly understood in humans. In this study, empagliflozin substantially decreased lithium reabsorption in the proximal tubule (PT) (a marker of proximal tubular sodium reabsorption), a magnitude out of proportion to that expected with only inhibition of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2. This finding was not driven by an "osmotic diuretic" effect; however, several parameters changed in a manner consistent with inhibition of the sodium-hydrogen exchanger 3. The large changes in proximal tubular handling were acutely buffered by increased reabsorption in both the loop of Henle and the distal nephron, resulting in the observed modest acute natriuresis with these agents. After 14 days of empagliflozin, natriuresis waned due to increased reabsorption in the PT and/or loop of Henle. These findings confirm in humans that SGLT2i have complex and important effects on renal tubular solute handling., Background: The effect of SGLT2i on regional tubular sodium handling is poorly understood in humans but may be important for the cardiorenal benefits., Methods: This study used a previously reported randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study of empagliflozin 10 mg daily in patients with diabetes and heart failure. Sodium handling in the PT, loop of Henle (loop), and distal nephron was assessed at baseline and day 14 using fractional excretion of lithium (FELi), capturing PT/loop sodium reabsorption. Assessments were made with and without antagonism of sodium reabsorption through the loop using bumetanide., Results: Empagliflozin resulted in a large decrease in sodium reabsorption in the PT (increase in FELi=7.5%±10.6%, P = 0.001), with several observations suggesting inhibition of PT sodium hydrogen exchanger 3. In the absence of renal compensation, this would be expected to result in approximately 40 g of sodium excretion/24 hours with normal kidney function. However, rapid tubular compensation occurred with increased sodium reabsorption both in the loop ( P < 0.001) and distal nephron ( P < 0.001). Inhibition of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 did not attenuate over 14 days of empagliflozin ( P = 0.14). However, there were significant reductions in FELi ( P = 0.009), fractional excretion of sodium ( P = 0.004), and absolute fractional distal sodium reabsorption ( P = 0.036), indicating that chronic adaptation to SGLT2i results primarily from increased reabsorption in the loop and/or PT., Conclusions: Empagliflozin caused substantial redistribution of intrarenal sodium delivery and reabsorption, providing mechanistic substrate to explain some of the benefits of this class. Importantly, the large increase in sodium exit from the PT was balanced by distal compensation, consistent with SGLT2i excellent safety profile., Clinical Trial Registry Name and Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03027960 )., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Diuresis to achieve decongestion is a central aim of therapy in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). While multiple clinical trials have investigated initial diuretic strategies for a designated period of time, there is a paucity of evidence to guide diuretic titration strategies continued until decongestion is achieved. The use of urine chemistries (urine sodium and creatinine) in a natriuretic response prediction equation accurately estimates natriuresis in response to diuretic dosing, but a randomized clinical trial is needed to compare a urine chemistry-guided diuresis strategy with a strategy of usual care. The urinE chemiStry guided aCute heArt faiLure treATmEnt (ESCALATE) trial is designed to test the hypothesis that protocolized diuretic therapy guided by spot urine chemistry through completion of intravenous diuresis will be superior to usual care and improve outcomes over the 14 days following randomization. ESCALATE will randomize and obtain complete data on 450 patients with acute heart failure to a diuretic strategy guided by urine chemistry or a usual care strategy. Key inclusion criteria include an objective measure of hypervolemia with at least 10 pounds of estimated excess volume, and key exclusion criteria include significant valvular stenosis, hypotension, and a chronic need for dialysis. Our primary outcome is days of benefit over the 14 days after randomization. Days of benefit combines patient symptoms captured by global clinical status with clinical state quantifying the need for hospitalization and intravenous diuresis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04481919., Competing Interests: Disclosures ZC receives research funding from AstraZeneca and Cumberland Pharmaceuticals and consulting fees from Roche and Translational Catalyst. JHH receives research funding from the NIA, Boehringer Ingelheim and Merck. JL receives research funding from AstraZeneca, Volumetrix, Sensible Medical, NIH and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Abbott, Alleviant, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scienrific, CVRx, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Merck, Vascular Dynamics, VWave, WHiteswell. CJL reports research grants and contracts to institution from NIH, CDC, DoD, AbbVie, Entegrion, Endpoint Health, bioMerieux, and patents for risk stratification in septic shock unrelated to the current work. JOW receives research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb. EDS receives personal fees as an Associate Editor for the Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology and royalties as an author for UptoDate. JT reports grants and/or personal fees from 3ive labs, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Cardionomic, MagentaMed, Reprieve inc., FIRE1, W.L. Gore, Sanofi, Sequana Medical, Otsuka, Abbott, Merck, Windtree Therapeutics, Lexicon pharmaceuticals, Precardia, Relypsa, Regeneron, BD, Edwards life sciences, and Lilly. In addition, JMT has a patent Treatment of diuretic resistance issued to Yale and Corvidia Therapeutics Inc, a patent Methods for measuring renalase issued to Yale, and a patent Treatment of diuretic resistance pending with Reprieve inc. SPC reports consulting with Boehringer Ingelheim, Reprieve Cardiovascular, Aboott and research support from PCORI, NIH, DOD, and Beckman Coulter., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Approximately 25% of patients admitted to hospitals for worsening heart failure (WHF) are readmitted within 30 days., Objectives: The authors conducted a post hoc analysis of the SOLOIST-WHF (Effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Post-WHF) trial to evaluate the efficacy of sotagliflozin versus placebo to decrease mortality and HF-related events among patients who began study treatment on or before discharge from their index hospitalization., Methods: The main endpoint of interest was cardiovascular death or HF-related event (HF hospitalization or urgent care visit) occurring within 90 and 30 days after discharge for the index WHF hospitalization. Treatment comparisons were by proportional hazards models, generating HRs, 95% CIs, and P values., Results: Of 1,222 randomized patients, 596 received study drug on or before their date of discharge. Sotagliflozin reduced the main endpoint at 90 days after discharge (HR: 0.54 [95% CI: 0.35-0.82]; P = 0.004) and at 30 days (HR: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.27-0.91]; P = 0.023) and all-cause mortality at 90 days (HR: 0.39 [95% CI: 0.17-0.88]; P = 0.024). In subgroup analyses, sotagliflozin reduced the 90-day main endpoint regardless of sex, age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, left ventricular ejection fraction, or mineralocorticoid receptor agonist use. Sotagliflozin was well-tolerated but with slightly higher rates of diarrhea and volume-related events than placebo., Conclusions: Starting sotagliflozin before discharge in patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalized for WHF significantly decreased cardiovascular deaths and HF events through 30 and 90 days after discharge, emphasizing the importance of beginning sodium glucose cotransporter treatment before discharge., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by Sanofi and Lexicon Pharmaceuticals. Dr Pitt has received consulting fees from Lexicon, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, and Phasebio; has received consulting fees and/or stock options from Viror, KBP Biosciences, Cereno Scientific, Tricida, SCPharmaceuticals, SQinnovatiions, G-3 Pharmaceuticals, Protonintel, and Brainstorm medical; holds U.S. Patent 9931412 on site specific delivery of eplerenone to the myocardium; and U.S. Patent pending 63/045,783 on histone-modulating agents for the protection and treatment of organ damage. Dr Bhatt is the Chair of SOLOIST with research funding paid by Lexicon to Brigham and Women’s Hospital; he is on the Advisory Board for AngioWave, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, High Enroll, Janssen, Level Ex, McKinsey, Medscape Cardiology, Merck, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Regado Biosciences, and Stasys; is on the Board of Directors for AngioWave (stock options), Boston VA Research Institute, Bristol Myers Squibb (stock), DRS.LINQ (stock options), High Enroll (stock), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care, and TobeSoft; is Inaugural Chair for the American Heart Association Quality Oversight Committee; is a consultant for Broadview Ventures; is on the Data Monitoring Committees for Acesion Pharma, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute, for the PORTICO trial, funded by St. Jude Medical, now Abbott), Boston Scientific (Chair, PEITHO trial), Cleveland Clinic (including for the ExCEED trial, funded by Edwards), Contego Medical (Chair, PERFORMANCE 2), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Mayo Clinic, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (for the ENVISAGE trial, funded by Daiichi Sankyo; for the ABILITY-DM trial, funded by Concept Medical), Novartis, Population Health Research Institute; Rutgers University (for the NIH-funded MINT Trial); has received honoraria from American College of Cardiology (Senior Associate Editor, Clinical Trials and News, ACC.org; Chair, ACC Accreditation Oversight Committee), Arnold and Porter law firm (work related to Sanofi/Bristol-Myers Squibb clopidogrel litigation), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute; is on the RE-DUAL PCI clinical trial steering committee funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; is on the AEGIS-II executive committee funded by CSL Behring), Belvoir Publications (Editor in Chief, Harvard Heart Letter), Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group (clinical trial steering committees), Cowen and Company, Duke Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committees, including for the PRONOUNCE trial, funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals), HMP Global (Editor in Chief, Journal of Invasive Cardiology), Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Guest Editor; Associate Editor), K2P (Co-Chair, interdisciplinary curriculum), Level Ex, Medtelligence/ReachMD (CME steering committees), MJH Life Sciences, Oakstone CME (Course Director, Comprehensive Review of Interventional Cardiology), Piper Sandler, Population Health Research Institute (for the COMPASS operations committee, publications committee, steering committee, and USA national co-leader, funded by Bayer), Slack Publications (Chief Medical Editor, Cardiology Today’s Intervention), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care (Secretary/Treasurer), WebMD (CME steering committees), Wiley (steering committee); Clinical Cardiology (Deputy Editor), NCDR-ACTION Registry Steering Committee (Chair), VA CART Research and Publications Committee (Chair); Patent: Sotagliflozin (named on a patent for sotagliflozin assigned to Brigham and Women's Hospital who assigned it to Lexicon; neither he nor Brigham and Women’s Hospital receive any income from this patent); has received research funding from Abbott, Acesion Pharma, Afimmune, Aker Biomarine, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beren, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Eisai, Ethicon, Faraday Pharmaceuticals, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Forest Laboratories, Fractyl, Garmin, HLS Therapeutics, Idorsia, Ironwood, Ischemix, Janssen, Javelin, Lexicon, Lilly, Medtronic, Merck, Moderna, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Owkin, Pfizer, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Recardio, Regeneron, Reid Hoffman Foundation, Roche, Sanofi, Stasys, Synaptic, The Medicines Company, and 89Bio; has received royalties from Elsevier (Editor, Braunwald’s Heart Disease); is site co-investigator for Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, CSI, Endotronix, St. Jude Medical (now Abbott), Philips, SpectraWAVE, Svelte, Vascular Solutions; is a trustee for the American College of Cardiology; and has done unfunded research for FlowCo and Takeda. Dr Szarek has received salary support from CPC, a nonprofit academic research organization affiliated with the University of Colorado, that receives research grant/consulting funding from Abbott, Agios, Alexion Pharma, Alnylam, Amgen, Angionetics, ARCA Biopharma, Array, AstraZeneca, Atentiv, Audentes, Bayer, Better Therapeutics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cardiol Therapeutics, CellResearch, Cook Medical, Cook, CSL Behring, Eidos Therapeutics, EP Trading Co, Esperion Therapeutics, Everly Health, Faraday, Fortress Biotech, HDL Therapeutics, Heartflow, Hummingbird Bioscience, Insmed, Janssen, Kowa Research, Lexicon, Merck, MedPace, Medtronic, Moderna, Novate Medical, NovoNordisk, Pfizer, PhaseBio, PPD Development, Prairie Education and Research, Prothena Biosciences, Regeneron, Regio Biosciences, Sanifit Therapeutics, Sanofi, Smith and Nephew, Stealth BioTherapeutics, University of Colorado, University of Pittsburgh, Worldwide Clinical Trials, Wraser, and the Yale Cardiovascular Research Group; has received fees for performing analyses, steering committee fees, and travel support from Sanofi and Regeneron; has received consulting fees from CiVi, Esperion, and Amarin; has received Data Safety and Monitoring Board membership fees from Resverlogix and Janssen; and is a member of the JACC editorial board. Dr Cannon has received research grants from Amgen, Better Therapeutics, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer; consulting fees from Aegerion/Amryt, Alnylam, Amarin, Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, Ascendia, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Lexicon, Merck, Pfizer, Rhoshan, and Sanofi; and service on the Data and Safety Monitoring Boards for the Veteran’s Administration, Applied Therapeutics, and NovoNordisk. Dr Leiter has received research funding from, has provided CME on behalf of, and/or has acted an adviser to AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Lexicon, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Servier. Dr McGuire has received honoraria for trial leadership from Lexicon, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck & Co, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Esperion, Lilly USA, CSL Behring; and has received honoraria for consultancy from Lilly USA, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, CSL Behring, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Lexicon. Dr Lewis has received consultant fees from Sanofi. Dr Riddle has received honoraria for consulting from Adocia, Anji, Xeris, DalCor, and Theracos. Dr Voors has received consultancy and speaker fees and research support from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Cyrokinetics, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, NooNordisk, and Roche diagnostics. Dr Metra has received personal fees from Actelion, Amgen, Livanova, and Vifor pharma as a member of Executive or Data Monitoring Committees of sponsored clinical trials; from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boheringer Ingelhelm, Edwards Lifesciences, Novartis for participation in advisory boards and/or speeches at sponsored meetings. Dr Lund has received support from the Karolinska Institutet, the Swedish Research Council [grant 523-2014-2336], and the Swedish Heart Lung Foundation [grants 20150557, 20190310] and grants from AstraZeneca, Vifor, Boston Scientific, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and MSD; consulting honoraria from Vifor, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Pharmacosmos, MSD, MedScape, Sanofi, Lexicon, Myokardia, Boehringer Ingelheim, Servier, Edwards Lifesciences, and Alleviant; and speaker honoraria from Abbott, OrionPharma, MedScape, Radcliffe, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer; and has patents with AnaCardio and stock ownership in AnaCardio. Dr Komajda has received honoraria from Servier, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Sanofi as adviser/member of clinical trials committees. Dr Testani has received grants and/or personal fees from 3ive labs, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Cardionomic, MagentaMed, Reprieve Inc, FIRE1, W. L. Gore & Associates, Sanofi, Sequana Medical, Otsuka, Abbott, Merck, Windtree Therapeutics, Lexicon pharmaceuticals, Precardia, Relypsa, Regeneron, BD, Edwards Lifesciences, and Lilly; and has a patent treatment of diuretic resistance issued to Yale and Corvidia Therapeutics Inc, a patent methods for measuring Renalase issued to Yale, and a patent treatment of diuretic resistance pending with Reprieve Inc. Dr Ponikowski has received consultancy fees and speaker honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Vifor Pharma, Amgen, Servier, Novartis, Bayer, MSD, Pfizer, Impulse Dynamics, Renal Guard Solutions, BMS, AbbottVascular, and the Radcliffe Group. Dr Lopes has received research grants or contracts from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Medtronic, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis; funding for educational activities or lectures from Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, and Novo Nordisk; and funding for consulting or other services from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novo Nordisk. Dr Ezekowitz has received research support for trial leadership from Bayer, Merck & Co, Novo Nordisk, Cytokinetics, Applied Therapeutics, American Regent; and honoraria for consultancy from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Bayer, and Novartis. Dr Davies and Mr Sun are employed by and may have stock or stock options in Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr Verma has received research and/or speaking honoraria from Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, CMS, HLS, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, and Sanofi; and is the President of the Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group and holds the Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Cardiovascular Surgery. Dr Kosiborod has received research grants from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim; served as a consultant or advisory board member for Alnylam, Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Esperion Therapeutics, Janssen, Lexicon, Merck (Diabetes and Cardiovascular), Novo Nordisk, Pharmacosmos, Sanofi, Vifor Pharma; has received other research support from AstraZeneca; and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novo Nordisk. Dr Steg has received research grants from Amarin, Bayer, Sanofi, and Servier; speaker or consultant fees from Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Janssen, Kowa, Idorsia, Lexicon, Merck, Novartis, Novo-Nordisk, PhaseBio, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier; and is a Senior Associate Editor of Circulation. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

SGLT2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter 2) inhibitors interfere with the reabsorption of glucose and sodium in the early proximal renal tubule, but the magnitude and duration of any ensuing natriuretic or diuretic effect are the result of an interplay between the degree of upregulation of SGLT2 and sodium-hydrogen exchanger 3, the extent to which downstream compensatory tubular mechanisms are activated, and (potentially) the volume set point in individual patients. A comprehensive review and synthesis of available studies reveals several renal response patterns with substantial variation across studies and clinical settings. However, the common observation is an absence of a large acute or chronic diuresis or natriuresis with these agents, either when given alone or combined with other diuretics. This limited response results from the fact that renal compensation to these drugs is rapid and nearly complete within a few days or weeks, preventing progressive volume losses. Nevertheless, the finding that fractional excretion of glucose and lithium (the latter being a marker of proximal sodium reabsorption) persists during long-term treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors indicates that pharmacological tolerance to the effects of these drugs at the level of the proximal tubule does not meaningfully occur. This persistent proximal tubular effect of SGLT2 inhibitors can be hypothesized to produce a durable improvement in the internal set point for volume homeostasis, which may become clinically important during times of fluid expansion. However, it is difficult to know whether a treatment-related change in the volume set point actually occurs or contributes to the effect of these drugs to reduce the risk of major heart failure events. SGLT2 inhibitors exert cardioprotective effects by a direct effect on cardiomyocytes that is independent of the presence of or binding to SGLT2 or the actions of these drugs on the proximal renal tubule. Nevertheless, changes in the volume set point mediated by SGLT2 inhibitors might potentially act cooperatively with the direct favorable molecular and cellular effects of these drugs on cardiomyocytes to mediate their benefits on the development and clinical course of heart failure., Competing Interests: Disclosures M.P. reports consulting fees from 89Bio, Abbvie, Altimmune, Amgen, Ardelyx, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Caladrius, Casana, CSL Behring, Cytokinetics, Lilly, Moderna, Novartis, Reata, Regeneron, Relypsa, and Salamandra. J.M.T. reports grants or personal fees from 3iveLabs, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Cardionomic, MagentaMed, Reprieve Inc, FIRE1, W.L. Gore, Sanofi, Sequana Medical, Otsuka, Abbott, Merck, Windtree Therapeutics, Lexicon, Precardia, Relypsa, Regeneron, BD, Edwards Life Sciences, and Lilly. In addition, J.M.T. has a patent for treatment of diuretic resistance issued to Yale University and Corvidia Therapeutics Inc, a patent for methods for measuring renalase issued to Yale University, and a patent for treatment of diuretic resistance pending with Reprieve Inc. The other author reports no conflicts.

Cardiorenal syndrome is a term that refers to a collection of disorders involving both the heart and kidneys, encompassing multi-directional pathways between the 2 organs mediated through low arterial perfusion, venous congestion, and neurohormonal activation. The pathophysiology is complex and includes hemodynamic and neurohormonal changes, but inconsistent findings from recent studies suggest this is very heterogenous disorder. Management for ADHF remains focused on decongestion and neurohormonal blockade to overcome the intense sodium and fluid avidity of the CRS., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Previous studies have suggested venous congestion as a stronger mediator of negative cardio-renal interactions than low cardiac output, with neither factor having a dominant role. While the influence of these parameters on glomerular filtration have been described, the impact on diuretic responsiveness is unclear. The goal of this analysis was to understand the hemodynamic correlates of diuretic response in hospitalized patients with heart failure., Methods and Results: We analyzed patients from the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness (ESCAPE) dataset. Diuretic efficiency (DE) was defined as the average daily net fluid output per doubling of the peak loop diuretic dose. We evaluated a pulmonary artery catheter hemodynamic-guided cohort (n = 190) and a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) cohort (n = 324) where DE was evaluated with hemodynamic and TTE parameters. Metrics of "forward flow" such as cardiac index, mean arterial pressure and left ventricular ejection fraction were not associated with DE (p > 0.2 for all). Worse baseline venous congestion was paradoxically associated with better DE as assessed by right atrial pressure (RAP), right atrial area (RAA), and right ventricular systolic and diastolic area (p < 0.05 for all). Renal perfusion pressure (capturing both congestion and forward flow) was not associated with diuretic response (p = 0.84)., Conclusions: Worse venous congestion was weakly associated with better loop diuretic response. Metrics of "forward flow" did not demonstrate any correlation with diuretic response. These observations raise questions about the concept of central hemodynamic perturbations as the primary drivers of diuretic resistance on a population level in HF., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest J.M.T. reports grants and/or personal fees from 3ive labs, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Cardionomic, MagentaMed, Reprieve inc., FIRE1,W.L. Gore, Sanofi, Sequana Medical, Otsuka, Abbott, Merck, Windtree Therapeutics, Lexicon pharmaceuticals, Precardia, Relypsa, Regeneron, BD, Edwards life sciences, and Lilly. In addition, J.M.T. has a patent for Treatment of diuretic resistance issued to Yale and Corvidia Therapeutics Inc., a patent methods for measuring renalase issued to Yale, and a patent Treatment of diuretic resistance pending with Reprieve inc. V.S.R. has a patent for Treatment of diuretic resistance US20200079846A1 issued to Yale and Corvidia Therapeutics Inc. with royalties paid to Yale University, V.S.R. and J.M.T. and a patent Methods for measuring renalase WO2019133665A2 issued to Yale. V.S.R. reports personal fees from Translational Catalyst. Z.L.C. reports grants from AstraZeneca. J.B.I.M. reports personal fees from Astra-Zeneca, Boehringer Inglheim, Novartis, Merck, Moksha8, and Translational Catalyst. J.B serves as a consultant for Abbott, Adrenomed, Amgen, Array, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squib, CVRx, FIRE1, G3 Pharmaceutical, Impulse Dynamics, Innolife, Janssen, LivaNova, Luitpold, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, NovoNordisk, Relypsa, Roche, and Vifor. The rest of the authors report no disclosures relevant to the content of this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Acute kidney injury is common among hospitalized individuals, particularly those exposed to certain medications, and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. In a pragmatic, open-label, National Institutes of Health-funded, parallel group randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02771977), we investigate whether an automated clinical decision support system affects discontinuation rates of potentially nephrotoxic medications and improves outcomes in patients with AKI. Participants included 5060 hospitalized adults with AKI and an active order for any of three classes of medications of interest: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, or proton pump inhibitors. Within 24 hours of randomization, a medication of interest was discontinued in 61.1% of the alert group versus 55.9% of the usual care group (relative risk 1.08, 1.04 - 1.14, p = 0.0003). The primary outcome - a composite of progression of acute kidney injury, dialysis, or death within 14 days - occurred in 585 (23.1%) of individuals in the alert group and 639 (25.3%) of patients in the usual care group (RR 0.92, 0.83 - 1.01, p = 0.09). Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02771977., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Following treatment for acute decompensated heart failure, in-hospital observation on oral diuretics (OOD) is recommended, assuming it provides actionable information on discharge diuretic dosing and thus reduces readmissions., Methods: In the Mechanisms of Diuretic Resistance (MDR) cohort, we analyzed in-hospital measures of diuretic response, provider's decisions, and diuretic response ≈30 days postdischarge. In a Yale multicenter cohort, we assessed if in-hospital OOD was associated with 30-day readmission risk. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of in-hospital OOD., Results: Of the 468 patients in the MDR cohort, 57% (N=265) underwent in-hospital OOD. During the OOD, weight change and net fluid balance correlated poorly with each other ( r =0.36). Discharge diuretic dosing was similar between patients who had increased, stable, or decreased weight (decreased discharge dose from OOD dose in 77% versus 72% versus 70%, respectively), net fluid status (decreased discharge dose from OOD dose in 100% versus 69% versus 74%, respectively), and urine output (decreased discharge dose from OOD dose in 69% versus 79% versus 72%, respectively) during the 24-hour OOD period ( P >0.27 for all). In participants returning at 30 days for formal quantification of outpatient diuretic response (n=98), outpatient and inpatient OOD natriuresis was poorly correlated ( r =0.26). In the Yale multicenter cohort (n=18 454 hospitalizations), OOD occurred in 55% and was not associated with 30-day hospital readmission (hazard ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.93-1.05]; P =0.51)., Conclusions: In-hospital OOD did not provide actionable information on diuretic response, was not associated with outpatient dose selection, did not predict subsequent outpatient diuretic response, and was not associated with lower readmission rate. Additional research is needed to replicate these findings and understand if these resources could be better allocated elsewhere., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02546583.

Background: Congestion is central to the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF); thus, tracking congestion is crucial for the management of patients with HF. In this study we aimed to compare changes in inferior vena cava diameter (IVCD) with venous pressure following manipulation of volume status during ultrafiltration in patients with cardiac dysfunction., Methods and Results: Patients with stable hemodialysis and with systolic or diastolic dysfunction were studied. Central venous pressure (CVP) and peripheral venous pressure (PVP) were measured before and after hemodialysis. IVCD and PVP were measured simultaneously just before dialysis, 3 times during dialysis and immediately after dialysis. Changes in IVCD and PVP were compared at each timepoint with ultrafiltration volumes. We analyzed 30 hemodialysis sessions from 20 patients. PVP was validated as a surrogate for CVP. Mean ultrafiltration volume was 2102 ± 667 mL. IVCD discriminated better ultrafiltration volumes ≤ 500 mL or ≤ 750 mL than PVP (AUC 0.80 vs 0.62, and 0.80 vs 0.56, respectively; both P< 0.01). IVCD appeared to track better ultrafiltration volume (P< 0.01) and hemoconcentration (P< 0.05) than PVP. Changes in IVCD were of greater magnitude than those of PVP (average change from predialysis: -58 ± 30% vs -28 ± 21%; P< 0.001)., Conclusions: In patients undergoing ultrafiltration, changes in IVCD tracked changes in volume status better than venous pressure., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest ZLC receives research funding from AstraZeneca and Cumberland Pharmaceuticals. MM is a consultant for Baxter, Astra Zeneca, Lilly-Boehringer. She has received research support from the Renal Research Institute (Fresenius Medical Center). AM reports personal fees from Orion, Roche, Adrenomed and Fire 1 and grants and personal fees from 4TEEN4, Abbott, Roche and Sphyngotec. DB reports institutional grant support from Fire1. MRC provides consultancy advice to AstraZeneca, Servier, Roche Diagnostics, Fire1, Medtronic & Abbott. MF was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (K23HL151744). He receives consulting fees from Fire1. KD reports being speaker and consultancy fees from Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca, Fire1. BAB has received research support from R01 HL128526 and U01 HL160226, from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and W81XWH2210245, from the United States Department of Defense, as well as research grants from AstraZeneca, Axon, GlaxoSmithKline, Medtronic, Mesoblast, Novo Nordisk, and Tenax Therapeutics. BAB has received consulting fees from Actelion, Amgen, Aria, Axon Therapies, BD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Edwards Lifesciences, Eli Lilly, Imbria, Janssen, Merck, Novo Nordisk, NGM, NXT, and VADovations. BAB is named inventor on an issued patent (US Patent no. 10,307,179) for the tools and approach for a minimally invasive pericardial modification procedure to treat heart failure. JMT reports grants and/or personal fees from 3ive labs, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Cardionomic, MagentaMed, Reprieve inc., FIRE1, W.L. Gore, Sanofi, Sequana Medical, Otsuka, Abbott, Merck, Windtree Therapeutics, Lexicon pharmaceuticals, Precardia, Relypsa, Regeneron, BD, Edwards life sciences, and Lilly. In addition, JMT has a patent Treatment of diuretic resistance issued to Yale and Corvidia Therapeutics Inc, a patent Methods for measuring renalase issued to Yale, and a patent Treatment of diuretic resistance pending with Reprieve inc. JBIM reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Translational Catalyst, Merck, Moksha8, and Servier. The other authors report no conflicts relevant to the content of this manuscript., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Improvement in renal function (IRF) in acute decompensated heart failure is associated with adverse outcomes. The mechanisms driving this paradox remain undefined., Methods: Using the ROSE-AHF study (Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation-Acute Heart Failure), 277 patients were grouped according to renal function, with IRF defined by a ≥20% increase (N=75), worsening renal function by a ≥20% decline (N=53), and stable renal function (SRF) by a <20% change (N=149) in estimated glomerular filtration rate between baseline and 72 hours. Three well-validated renal tubular injury markers, NGAL (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin), NAG (N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase), and KIM-1 (kidney injury molecule 1), were evaluated at baseline and 72 hours. Patients were also classified by the pattern of change in these markers., Results: Patients with IRF had the lowest admission estimated glomerular filtration rate (IRF, 37 [28 to 51] mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ; worsening renal function, 43 [35 to 55] mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ; and SRF, 43 [32 to 55] mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ; P trend =0.032) but greater cumulative urine output (IRF, 8780 [7025 to 11 208] mL; worsening renal function, 7860 [5555 to 9765] mL; and SRF, 8150 [6325 to 10 456] mL; P trend =0.024) and weight loss (IRF, -9.0 [-12.4 to -5.3] lb; worsening renal function, -5.1 [-8.1 to -1.3] lb; and SRF, -7.1 [-11.9 to -3.2] lb; P trend <0.001) despite similar diuretic doses ( P trend =0.16). There were no differences in the relative change in NGAL, NAG, or KIM-1 between renal function groups ( P trend >0.19 for all). Patients with IRF had worse survival than patients with SRF (27% versus 54%; hazard ratio, 1.98 [1.10-3.58]; P =0.024)., Conclusions: IRF during decongestive therapy for acute decompensated heart failure was not associated with improved markers of renal tubular injury and was associated with worsened survival, likely driven by the presence of greater underlying cardiorenal dysfunction and more severe congestion.

Objectives: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to support patients in severe cardiogenic shock. In the absence of recovery, these patients may need to be listed for heart transplant (HT), which offers the best long-term prognosis. However, posttransplantation mortality is significantly elevated in patients who receive ECMO. The objective of the present study was to describe and risk-stratify different profiles of patients listed for HT supported by ECMO., Methods: Patients listed for HT in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were analyzed. The primary outcome was 1-year survival and was assessed in patients bridged to transplant with ECMO (ECMO BTT ) and patients who were previously supported on ECMO but had it removed before HT (ECMO REMOVED )., Results: Among 65,636 adult candidates listed for HT (between 2001 and 2017), 712 were supported on ECMO, 292 of whom (41%) underwent HT (ECMO BTT , n = 202; ECMO REMOVED , n = 90). Most of the patients with ECMO REMOVED were transplanted with a ventricular assist device. In ECMO BTT , recipient age (each 10-year increase), time on the waitlist (both defined as minor risk factors), need for dialysis, and need for mechanical ventilation (both defined as major risk factors) were independent predictors of mortality. ECMO REMOVED and ECMO BTT with no risk factors showed 1-year survival comparable to that in patients who were never supported on ECMO. Compared with patients who were never on ECMO, patients in ECMO BTT group with minor risk factors, 1 major risk factor, and 2 major risk factors had ~2-, ~5-, and >10-fold greater 1-year mortality, respectively (P < .05)., Conclusions: The HT recipients in the ECMO REMOVED and ECMO BTT groups with no risk factors showed similar survival as the HT recipients who were never supported on ECMO. In the ECMO BTT group, posttransplantation mortality increased significantly with increasing risk factors., (Copyright © 2021 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Although furosemide is the most commonly used loop diuretic in patients with heart failure, some studies suggest a potential benefit for torsemide., Objective: To determine whether torsemide results in decreased mortality compared with furosemide among patients hospitalized for heart failure., Design, Setting, and Participants: TRANSFORM-HF was an open-label, pragmatic randomized trial that recruited 2859 participants hospitalized with heart failure (regardless of ejection fraction) at 60 hospitals in the United States. Recruitment occurred from June 2018 through March 2022, with follow-up through 30 months for death and 12 months for hospitalizations. The final date for follow-up data collection was July 2022., Interventions: Loop diuretic strategy of torsemide (n = 1431) or furosemide (n = 1428) with investigator-selected dosage., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality in a time-to-event analysis. There were 5 secondary outcomes with all-cause mortality or all-cause hospitalization and total hospitalizations assessed over 12 months being highest in the hierarchy. The prespecified primary hypothesis was that torsemide would reduce all-cause mortality by 20% compared with furosemide., Results: TRANSFORM-HF randomized 2859 participants with a median age of 65 years (IQR, 56-75), 36.9% were women, and 33.9% were Black. Over a median follow-up of 17.4 months, a total of 113 patients (53 [3.7%] in the torsemide group and 60 [4.2%] in the furosemide group) withdrew consent from the trial prior to completion. Death occurred in 373 of 1431 patients (26.1%) in the torsemide group and 374 of 1428 patients (26.2%) in the furosemide group (hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.89-1.18]). Over 12 months following randomization, all-cause mortality or all-cause hospitalization occurred in 677 patients (47.3%) in the torsemide group and 704 patients (49.3%) in the furosemide group (hazard ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.83-1.02]). There were 940 total hospitalizations among 536 participants in the torsemide group and 987 total hospitalizations among 577 participants in the furosemide group (rate ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.84-1.07]). Results were similar across prespecified subgroups, including among patients with reduced, mildly reduced, or preserved ejection fraction., Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients discharged after hospitalization for heart failure, torsemide compared with furosemide did not result in a significant difference in all-cause mortality over 12 months. However, interpretation of these findings is limited by loss to follow-up and participant crossover and nonadherence., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03296813.

Background: Sodium restriction is recommended for patients with heart failure (HF) despite the lack of solid clinical evidence from randomized controlled trials. Whether or not sodium restrictions provide beneficial cardiac effects is not known., Methods: The present study is a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of stable HF patients with ejection fraction ≤ 40%. Patients were allocated to sodium restriction (2 g of sodium/day) vs. control (3 g of sodium/day). The primary outcome was change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) at 20 weeks. Secondary outcomes included quality of life and adverse safety events (HF readmission, blood pressure or electrolyte abnormalities)., Results: Seventy patients were enrolled. Median baseline sodium consumption was 3268 (2225-4537) mg/day. Adherence to the intervention based on 24-hour urinary sodium was 32%. NT-proBNP and quality of life did not significantly change between groups (p > 0.05 for both). Adverse safety events were not significantly different between the arms (p > 0.6 for all). In the per protocol analysis, patients who achieved a sodium intake < 2500 mg/day at the intervention conclusion showed improvements in NT-proBNP levels (between-group difference: -55%, 95% confidence interval -27 to -73%; p = 0.002) and quality of life (between-group difference: -11 ± 5 points; p = 0.04). Blood pressure decreased in patients with lower sodium intake (between-group difference: -9 ± 5 mmHg; p = 0.05) without significant differences in symptomatic hypotension or other safety events (p > 0.3 for all)., Conclusions: Adherence assessed by 24-hour natriuresis and by the nutritionist was poor. The group allocated to sodium restriction did not show improvement in NT-proBNP. However, patients who achieved a sodium intake < 2500 mg/day appeared to have improvements in NT-proBNP and quality of life without any adverse safety signals., Clinicaltrials: gov Identifier: NCT03351283.

Background: Decongestion is an important goal in the management of acute heart failure. Whether the rate of decongestion is associated with mortality and cardiovascular outcomes is unknown., Methods: Using data from 4133 patients from the Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure Outcome Study With Tolvaptan (EVEREST) trial, we used multivariable Cox regression models to evaluate the association between rates of in-hospital change in assessments of volume overload, including b-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), as well as change in hemoconcentration, with risk of all-cause mortality and a composite outcome of cardiovascular mortality or heart failure hospitalization., Results: More rapid rates of in-hospital decongestion were associated with decreased risk of mortality and the composite outcome over a median 10-month follow-up. In reference to the quartile of slowest decline, the quartile with the fastest BNP and NT-proBNP decline had lower hazards of mortality (hazard rate [HR] = 0.43 [0.31, 0.59] and HR = 0.27 [0.19, 0.40], respectively) and composite outcome (HR = 0.49 [0.39, 0.60] and HR = 0.54 [0.42, 0.71], respectively). In reference to the quartile of slowest increase, the quartile with the fastest hematocrit increase had lower hazards of mortality (HR = 0.77 [0.62, 0.95]) and composite outcome (HR = 0.75 [0.64, 0.88]). Results were also consistent when models were repeated using propensity-score matching., Conclusions: Faster rates of decongestion are associated with reduced risk of mortality and a composite of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization. It remains unknown whether more rapid decongestion provides cardiovascular benefit or whether it serves as a proxy for less treatment resistant heart failure., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale & Objective: Achievement of decongestion in acute heart failure (AHF) is associated with improved survival and cardiovascular outcomes but can be associated with acute declines in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We examined whether the rate of in-hospital decongestion is associated with longer term kidney function decline., Study Design: Post hoc analysis of trial data., Settings & Participants: Patients with ≥2 measures of kidney function (n = 3,500) from the Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure Outcome Study With Tolvaptan (EVEREST) trial., Exposure: In-hospital rate of change in assessments of volume overload, including B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and clinical congestion score (0-12); and rate of change in hemoconcentration including measures of hematocrit, albumin, and total protein., Outcome: Incident chronic kidney disease GFR category 4 or worse (chronic kidney disease [CKD] categories G4-G5; defined by a new eGFR of <30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) and eGFR decline of >40%., Analytical Approach: Multivariable cause-specific hazards models., Results: Over median 10-month follow-up period, faster decreases in volume overload and more rapid increases in hemoconcentration were associated with a decreased risk of incident CKD G4-G5 and eGFR decline of >40%. In adjusted analyses, for every 6% faster decline in BNP per week, there was a 32% lower risk of both incident CKD G4-G5 (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.58-0.79]) and eGFR decline of >40% (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.57-0.80]). For every 1% faster increase per week in absolute hematocrit, there was a lower risk for both incident CKD G4-G5 (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.64-0.84]) and eGFR decline of >40% (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.71-0.95]), with results consistent for other biomarkers., Limitations: Possibility of residual confounding., Conclusions: These results provide reassurance that more rapid decongestion in patients with AHF does not increase the risk of adverse kidney outcomes in patients with heart failure., (Copyright © 2021 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Worsening serum creatinine is common during treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). A possible contributor to creatinine increase is diuresis-induced changes in volume of distribution (VD) of creatinine as total body water (TBW) contracts around a fixed mass of creatinine. Our objective was to better understand the filtration and nonfiltration factors driving change in creatinine during ADHF., Methods: Participants in the ROSE-AHF trial with baseline to 72-hour serum creatinine; net fluid output; and urinary KIM-1, NGAL, and NAG were included ( n =270). Changes in VD were calculated by accounting for measured input and outputs from weight-based calculated TBW. Changes in observed creatinine (Cr observed ) were compared with predicted changes in creatinine after accounting for alterations in VD and non-steady state conditions using a kinetic GFR equation (Cr 72HR Kinetic )., Results: When considering only change in VD, the median diuresis to elicit a ≥0.3 mg/dl rise in creatinine was -7526 ml (IQR, -5932 to -9149). After accounting for stable creatinine filtration during diuresis, a change in VD alone was insufficient to elicit a ≥0.3 mg/dl rise in creatinine. Larger estimated decreases in VD were paradoxically associated with improvement in Cr observed ( r =-0.18, P =0.003). Overall, -3% of the change in eCr 72HR Kinetic was attributable to the change in VD. A ≥0.3 mg/dl rise in eCr 72HR Kinetic was not associated with worsening of KIM-1, NGAL, NAG, or postdischarge survival ( P >0.05 for all)., Conclusions: During ADHF therapy, increases in serum creatinine are driven predominantly by changes in filtration, with minimal contribution from change in VD., Competing Interests: J.L. Asher reports receiving research funding from Sequana Medical and having consultancy agreements with Translational Catalyst. S.G. Coca reports having consultancy agreements with Axon, Bayer, CHF Solutions, 3ive, Renalytix, Reprieve Cardiovascular, Takeda, and Vifor; serving on the editorial boards of CJASN, JASN, and Kidney International; serving as an associate editor for Kidney360; receiving research funding from ProKidney, Renalytix, Renal Research Institute (RRI), and XORTX; having ownership interest in pulseData and Renalytix; having patents and inventions with Renalytix; and serving as a scientific advisor for, or member of, Reprieve Cardiovascular and Renalytix. Z.L. Cox reports receiving research funding from AstraZeneca and Cumberland Emerging Technologies. L.A. Inker reports serving in an advisory or leadership role for the Alport’s Foundation, Diametrix, and Goldfinch; serving as a member of the American Society of Nephrology, National Kidney Disease Education Program, and National Kidney Foundation; having consultancy agreements with Diamtrix and Tricida; receiving research funding (for the institution) from the National Institutes of Health, National Kidney Foundation, Omeros, Reata Pharmaceuticals, and Travere; and having consulting agreements with Omeros and Tricida. J.B. Ivey-Miranda reports serving on a speakers bureau for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Moksha8, and Novartis. V.S. Rao reports having patents or royalties with Corvidia Therapeutics and having consultancy agreements with Translational Catalyst. J.M. Testani reports receiving research funding from Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, FIRE1, 3ive Labs, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Otsuka, Reprieve, Sanofi, and Sequana Medical; having consultancy agreements with, and receiving honoraria from, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardionomic, Edwards Life Sciences, FIRE1, 3ive Labs, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, MagentaMed, Merck, Novartis, Otsuka, Precardia, Regeneron, Relypsa, Reprieve, Sanofi, Sequana Medical, Windtree Therapeutics, and W.L. Gore; having patents or royalties with Corvidia, Reprieve, and Yale University; and having ownership interest in Reprieve and Sequana Medical. F.P. Wilson reports serving on the editorial boards for the American Journal of Kidney Disease and CJASN; receiving research funding from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Vifor, and Whoop; being the owner of Efference; having other interests in, or relationships with, Gaylord Health Care (on the board of directors) and Medscape (medical commentator); and having consultancy agreements with Translational Catalyst. All remaining authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Rationale & Objective: Heart failure treatment relies on loop diuretics to induce natriuresis and decongestion, but the therapy is often limited by diuretic resistance. We explored the association of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activation with diuretic response., Study Design: Observational cohort., Setting & Population: Euvolemic ambulatory adults with chronic heart failure were administered torsemide in a monitored environment., Predictors: Plasma total renin, active renin, angiotensinogen, and aldosterone levels. Urine total renin and angiotensinogen levels., Outcomes: Sodium output per doubling of diuretic dose and fractional excretion of sodium per doubling of diuretic dose., Analytical Approach: Robust linear regression models estimated the associations of each RAAS intermediate with outcomes., Results: The analysis included 56 participants, and the median age was 65 years; 50% were women, and 41% were Black. The median home diuretic dose was 80-mg furosemide equivalents. In unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted models, higher levels of RAAS measures were generally associated with lower diuretic efficiency. Higher plasma total renin remained significantly associated with lower sodium output per doubling of diuretic dose (β = -0.41 [-0.76, -0.059] per SD change) with adjustment; higher plasma total and active renin were significantly associated with lower fractional excretion of sodium per doubling of diuretic dose (β = -0.48 [-0.83, -0.14] and β = -0.51 [-0.95, -0.08], respectively) in adjusted models. Stratification by RAAS inhibitor use did not substantially alter these associations., Limitations: Small sample size; highly selected participants; associations may not be causal., Conclusions: Among multiple measures of RAAS activation, higher plasma total and active renin levels were consistently associated with lower diuretic response. These findings highlight the potential drivers of diuretic resistance and underscore the need for high-quality trials of decongestive therapy enhanced by RAAS blockade.

Novel pharmacologic treatment options reduce mortality and morbidity in a cost-effective manner in patients with heart failure (HF). Undisputedly, the effective implementation of these agents is an essential element of good clinical practice, which is endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on acute and chronic HF. Yet, physicians struggle to implement these therapies as they have to balance the true and/or perceived risks versus their substantial benefits in clinical practice. Any worsening of biomarkers of renal function is often perceived as being disadvantageous and is in clinical practice one of the most common reasons for ineffective drug implementation. However, even in this context, they clearly reduce mortality and morbidity in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients, even in patients with poor renal function. Furthermore these agents are also beneficial in HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors more recently demonstrated a beneficial effect in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The emerge of several new classes (angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor [ARNI], SGLT2 inhibitors, vericiguat, omecamtiv mecarbil) and the recommendation by the 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic HF of early initiation and titration of quadruple disease-modifying therapies (ARNI/angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor + beta-blocker + mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist and SGLT2 inhibitor) in HFrEF increases the likelihood of treatment-induced changes in renal function. This may be (incorrectly) perceived as deleterious, resulting in inertia of starting and uptitrating these lifesaving therapies. Therefore, the objective of this consensus document is to provide advice of the effect HF drugs on renal function., (© 2022 European Society of Cardiology.)

Despite the incompletely understood multiple etiologies and underlying mechanisms, cardiorenal syndrome is characterized by decreased glomerular filtration and sodium avidity. The underlying level of renal sodium avidity is of primary importance in driving a congested heart failure phenotype and ultimately determining the response to diuretic therapy. Historically, mechanisms of kidney sodium avidity and resultant diuretic resistance were primarily extrapolated to cardiorenal syndrome from non-heart failure populations. Yet, the mechanisms appear to differ between these populations. Recent literature in acute decompensated heart failure has refuted several classically accepted diuretic resistance mechanisms and reshaped how we conceptualize diuretic resistance mechanisms in cardiorenal syndrome. Herein, we propose an anatomically based categorization of diuretic resistance mechanisms to establish the relative importance of specific transporters and translate findings toward therapeutic strategies. Within this categorical structure, we discuss classic and novel mechanisms of diuretic resistance., Competing Interests: Z.L. Cox reports grants from AstraZeneca and Cumberland Emerging Technologies. V.S. Rao reports personal fees from Translational Catalyst. V.S. Rao and J.M. Testani have a patent (Treatment of diuretic resistance US20200079846A1) issued to Yale and Corvidia Therapeutics, Inc., with royalties paid to Yale University, and a patent (Methods for measuring renalase WO2019133665A2) issued to Yale. J.M. Testani reports grants from Abbott and Otsuka; grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, FIRE1, Merck, Reprieve medical, Sanofi, Sequana Medical, and 3ive labs; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cardionomic, W.L. Gore, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, MagentaMed, Novartis, Regeneron, and Windtree Therapeutics outside the submitted work; and has a patent (Treatment of diuretic resistance) pending to Reprieve Medical., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Aims: Remote monitoring of pulmonary artery pressure has reduced heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in chronic HF as elevation of pulmonary artery pressure provides information that can guide treatment. The venous system is characterized by high capacitance, thus substantial increases in intravascular volume can occur before filling pressures increase. The inferior vena cava (IVC) is a highly compliant venous conduit and thus a candidate for early detection of change in intravascular volume. We aimed to compare IVC cross-sectional area using a novel sensor with cardiac filling pressures during experimental manipulation of volume status, vascular tone, and cardiac function., Methods and Results: Experiments were conducted in sheep to manipulate volume status (colloid infusion), vascular tone (nitroglycerin infusion) and cardiac function (rapid cardiac pacing). A wireless implantable IVC sensor was validated ex-vivo and in-vivo, and then used to measure the cross-sectional area of the IVC. Right- and left-sided cardiac filling pressures were obtained via right heart catheterization. The IVC sensor provided highly accurate and precise measurements of cross-sectional area in ex-vivo and in-vivo validation. IVC area changes were more sensitive than the corresponding changes in cardiac filling pressures during colloid infusion (p < 0.001), vasodilatation (p < 0.001) and cardiac dysfunction induced by rapid pacing (p ≤ 0.02)., Conclusions: Inferior vena cava area can be remotely and accurately measured in real time with a wireless implantable sensor. Changes in IVC area are more sensitive than corresponding changes in filling pressures following experimental volume loading and fluid redistribution. Additional research is warranted to understand if remote monitoring of the IVC may have advantages over pressure-based monitors in HF., (© 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: In patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, acute kidney injury (AKI) is common, and can occur either from kidney injury unrelated to ICI use or from immune activation resulting in acute interstitial nephritis (AIN). In this study, we test the hypothesis that occurrence of AIN indicates a favorable treatment response to ICI therapy and therefore among patients who develop AKI while on ICI therapy, those with AIN will demonstrate greater survival compared with others with AKI., Methods: In this observational cohort study, we included participants initiated on ICI therapy between 2013 and 2019. We tested the independent association of AKI and estimated AIN (eAIN) with mortality up to 1 year after therapy initiation as compared with those without AKI using time-varying Cox proportional hazard models controlling for demographics, comorbidities, cancer type, stage, and therapy, and baseline laboratory values. We defined eAIN as those with a predicted probability of AIN >90th percentile derived from a recently validated diagnostic model., Results: Of 2207 patients initiated on ICIs, 617 (28%) died at 1 year and 549 (25%) developed AKI. AKI was independently associated with higher mortality (adjusted HR, 2.28 (95% CI 1.90 to 2.72)). Those AKI patients with eAIN had more severe AKI as reflected by a higher peak serum creatinine (3.3 (IQR 2.1-6.1) vs 1.4 (1.2-1.9) mg/dL, p<0.001) but exhibited lower mortality than those without eAIN in univariable analysis (HR 0.43 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.89)) and after adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and cancer type and severity (adjusted HR 0.44 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.93))., Conclusion: In patients treated with ICI, mortality was higher in those with AKI unrelated to ICI but lower in those where the underlying etiology was AIN. Future studies could evaluate the association of biopsy-proven or biomarker-proven AIN with mortality in those receiving ICI therapy., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DGM and CRP are coinventors of the pending patent application 'Methods and Systems for Diagnosis of Acute Interstitial Nephritis' that is subject to an option for a license agreement with Renalytix AI., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) as identified by a reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is a common comorbidity in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The presence of CKD is associated with more severe heart failure, and CKD itself is a strong independent risk factor of poor cardiovascular outcome. Furthermore, the presence of CKD often influences the decision to start, uptitrate, or discontinue possible life-saving HFrEF therapies. Because pivotal HFrEF randomized clinical trials have historically excluded patients with stage 4 and 5 CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ), information on the efficacy and tolerability of HFrEF therapies in these patients is limited. However, more recent HFrEF trials with novel classes of drugs included patients with more severe CKD. In this review on medical therapy in patients with HFrEF and CKD, we show that for both all-cause mortality and the combined end point of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization, most drug classes are safe and effective up to CKD stage 3B (eGFR minimum 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). For more severe CKD (stage 4), there is evidence of safety and efficacy of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and to a lesser extent, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, vericiguat, digoxin and omecamtiv mecarbil, although this evidence is restricted to improvement of cardiovascular death/heart failure hospitalization. Data are lacking on the safety and efficacy for any HFrEF therapies in CKD stage 5 (eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or dialysis) for either end point. Last, although an initial decline in eGFR is observed on initiation of several HFrEF drug classes (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers/mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists/angiotensin receptor blocker neprilysin inhibitors/sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors), renal function often stabilizes over time, and the drugs maintain their clinical efficacy. A decline in eGFR in the context of a stable or improving clinical condition should therefore not be cause for concern and should not lead to discontinuation of life-saving HFrEF therapies.

Objective: Understanding cardiorenal pathophysiology in heart failure (HF) is of clinical importance. We sought to characterize the renal hemodynamic function and the transrenal gradient of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) markers in patients with HF and in controls without HF., Methods: In this post hoc analysis, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR inulin ), effective renal plasma flow (ERPF PAH ) and transrenal gradients (arterial-renal vein) of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), aldosterone, and plasma renin activity (PRA) were measured in 47 patients with HF and in 24 controls. Gomez equations were used to derive afferent (R A ) and efferent (R E ) arteriolar resistances. Transrenal RAAS gradients were also collected in patients treated with intravenous dobutamine (HF, n = 11; non-HF, n = 11) or nitroprusside (HF, n = 18; non-HF, n = 5)., Results: The concentrations of PRA, aldosterone and ACE were higher in the renal vein vs the artery in patients with HF vs patients without HF (P < 0.01). In patients with HF, a greater ACE gradient was associated with greater renal vascular resistance (r = 0.42; P 0.007) and greater arteriolar resistances (R A : r = 0.39; P = 0.012; R E : r = 0.48; P = 0.002). Similarly, a greater aldosterone gradient was associated with lower GFR (r = -0.51; P = 0.0007) and renal blood flow (RBF), r = -0.32; P = 0.042) whereas greater PRA gradient with lower ERPF (r = -0.33; P = 0.040), GFR (r = -0.36; P = 0.024), and RBF (r = -0.33; P = 0.036). Dobutamine and nitroprusside treatment decreased the transrenal gradient of ACE (P = 0.012, P < 0.0001, respectively), aldosterone (P = 0.005, P = 0.030) and PRA (P = 0.014, P = 0.002) in patients with HF only., Conclusions: A larger transrenal RAAS marker gradient in patients with HF suggests a renal origin for neurohormonal activation associated with a vasoconstrictive renal profile., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The concept of multinephron segment diuretic therapy (MSDT) has been recommended in severe diuretic resistance with only expert opinion and case-level evidence. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of MSDT, combining 4 diuretic classes, in acute heart failure (AHF) complicated by diuretic resistance., Methods and Results: A retrospective analysis was conducted in patients hospitalized with AHF at a single medical center who received MSDT, including concomitant carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, loop, thiazide, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist diuretics. Subjects served as their own controls with efficacy evaluated as urine output and weight change before and after MSDT. Serum chemistries, renal replacement therapies, and in-hospital mortality were evaluated for safety. Patients with severe diuretic resistance before MSDT were analyzed as a subcohort. A total of 167 patients with AHF and diuretic resistance received MSDT. MSDT was associated with increased median 24-hour urine output in the first day of therapy compared with the previous day (2.16 L [0.95-4.14 L] to 3.08 L [1.74-4.86 L], P = .003) in the total cohort and in the Severe diuretic resistance cohort (0.91 L [0.43-1.43 L] to 2.08 L [1.13-3.96 L], P < .001). The median cumulative weight loss at day 7 or discharge was -7.4 kg (-15.3 to -3.4 kg) (P = .02). Neither serum sodium, chloride, potassium, bicarbonate, or creatinine changed significantly relative to baseline (P > .05 for all)., Conclusions: In an AHF cohort with diuretic resistance, MSDT was associated with increased diuresis without changes in serum chemistries or kidney function. Prospective studies of MSDT in AHF and diuretic resistance are warranted., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: In healthy volunteers, the kidney deploys compensatory post-diuretic sodium reabsorption (CPDSR) following loop diuretic-induced natriuresis, minimizing sodium excretion and producing a neutral sodium balance. CPDSR is extrapolated to non-euvolemic populations as a diuretic resistance mechanism; however, its importance in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is unknown., Methods and Results: Patients with ADHF in the Mechanisms of Diuretic Resistance cohort receiving intravenous loop diuretics (462 administrations in 285 patients) underwent supervised urine collections entailing an immediate pre-diuretic spot urine sample, then 6-h (diuretic-induced natriuresis period) and 18-h (post-diuretic period) urine collections. The average spot urine sodium concentration immediately prior to diuretic administration [median 15 h (13-17) after last diuretic] was 64 ± 33 mmol/L with only 4% of patients having low (<20 mmol/L) urine sodium consistent with CPDSR. Paradoxically, greater 6-h diuretic-induced natriuresis was associated with larger 18-h post-diuretic spontaneous natriuresis (r = 0.7, P < 0.001). Higher pre-diuretic urine sodium to creatinine ratio (r = 0.37, P < 0.001) was the strongest predictor of post-diuretic spontaneous natriuresis. In a subgroup of patients (n = 43) randomized to protocol-driven intensified diuretic therapies, the mean diuretic-induced natriuresis increased three-fold. In contrast to the substantial decrease in spontaneous natriuresis predicted by CPDSR, no change in post-diuretic spontaneous natriuresis was observed (P = 0.47)., Conclusion: On a population level, CPDSR was not an important driver of diuretic resistance in hypervolemic ADHF. Contrary to CPDSR, a greater diuretic-induced natriuresis predicted a larger post-diuretic spontaneous natriuresis. Basal sodium avidity, rather than diuretic-induced CPDSR, appears to be the predominant determinate of both diuretic-induced and post-diuretic natriuresis in hypervolemic ADHF., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Animal models implicate FGF-23 (fibroblast growth factor-23) as a direct contributor to adverse cardiorenal interactions such as sodium avidity, diuretic resistance, and neurohormonal activation, but this has not been conclusively demonstrated in humans. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether FGF-23 is associated with parameters of cardiorenal dysfunction in humans with heart failure, independent of confounding factors., Methods: One hundred ninety-nine outpatients with heart failure undergoing diuretic treatment at the Yale Transitional Care Center were enrolled and underwent blood collection, and urine sampling before and after diuretics., Results: FGF-23 was associated with several metrics of disease severity such as higher home loop diuretic dose and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum chloride, and serum albumin. Multivariable analysis demonstrated no statistically significant association between FGF-23 and sodium avidity measured by fractional excretion of sodium, or proximal or distal tubular sodium reabsorption, either before diuretic administration or at peak diuresis ( P ≥0.11 for all). Likewise, FGF-23 was not independently associated with parameters of diuretic resistance (diuretic excretion, cumulative urine and sodium output, and loop diuretic efficiency [ P ≥0.33 for all]) or neurohormonal activation (plasma or urine renin [ P ≥0.36 for all]). Moreover, the upper boundary of the 95% CI of all the partial correlations were ≤0.30, supporting the lack of meaningful correlations. FGF-23 was not associated with mortality in multivariable analysis ( P =0.44)., Conclusions: FGF-23 was not meaningfully associated with any cardiorenal parameter in patients with heart failure. While our methods cannot rule out a small effect, FGF-23 is unlikely to be a primary driver of cardiorenal interactions.

Congestion is the primary pathophysiological lesion in most heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. Renal congestion increases renal tubular pressure, reducing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and diuresis. Because each nephron is a fluid-filled column, renal negative pressure therapy (rNPT) applied to the urinary collecting system should reduce tubular pressure, potentially improving kidney function. We evaluated the renal response to rNPT in congestive HF. Ten anesthetized ∼80-kg pigs underwent instrumentation with bilateral renal pelvic JuxtaFlow catheters. GFR was determined by iothalamate clearance (mGFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) by para-aminohippurate clearance. Each animal served as its own control with randomization of left versus right kidney to -30 mmHg rNPT or no rNPT. mGFR and RPF were measured simultaneously from the rNPT and no rNPT kidney. Congestive HF was induced via cardiac tamponade maintaining central venous pressure at 20-22.5 mmHg throughout the experiment. Before HF induction, rNPT increased natriuresis, diuresis, and mGFR compared with the control kidney ( P < 0.001 for all). Natriuresis, diuresis, and mGFR decreased following HF ( P < 0.001 for all) but were higher in rNPT kidney versus control ( P < 0.001 for all). RPF decreased during HF ( P < 0.001) without significant differences between rNPT treatments. During HF, the rNPT kidney had similar diuresis and natriuresis ( P > 0.5 for both) and higher fractional excretion of sodium ( P = 0.001) compared with the non-rNPT kidney in the no HF period. In conclusion, rNPT resulted in significantly increased diuresis, natriuresis, and mGFR, with or without experimental HF. rNPT improved key renal parameters of the congested cardiorenal phenotype.

Background: Decongestion is a primary goal during hospitalizations for decompensated heart failure (HF). However, data surrounding the preferred route and strategy of diuretic administration are limited with varying results in prior studies., Methods: This is a retrospective analysis using patients from ASCEND-HF with a stable diuretic strategy in the first 24 hours following randomization. Patients were divided into three groups: intravenous (IV) continuous, IV bolus and oral strategy. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, 30-day composite cardiovascular mortality or HF rehospitalization and 180-day all-cause mortality were compared across groups. Inverse propensity weighted modeling was used for adjustment., Results: Among 5,738 patients with a stable diuretic regimen in the first 24 hours (80% of overall ASCEND trial), 3,944 (68.7%) patients received IV intermittent bolus administration of diuretics, 799 (13.9%) patients received IV continuous therapy and 995 (17.3%) patients with oral administration. Patients in the IV continuous group had a higher baseline creatinine (IV continuous 1.4 [1.1-1.7]; intermittent bolus 1.2 [1.0-1.6]; oral 1.2 [1.0-1.4] mg/dL; P <0.001) and high NTproBNP (IV continuous 5,216 [2,599-11,603]; intermittent bolus 4,944 [2,339-9,970]; oral 3,344 [1,570-7,077] pg/mL; P <0.001). There was no difference between IV continuous and intermittent bolus group in weight change, total urine output and change in renal function till 10 days/discharge (adjusted P >0.05 for all). There was no difference in 30 day mortality and HF readmission (adjusted OR 1.08 [95%CI: 0.74, 1.57]; P = 0.701) and 180 days mortality (adjusted OR 1.04 [95%CI: 0.75, 1.43]; P = 0.832)., Conclusion: In a large cohort of patients with decompensated HF, there were no significant differences in diuretic-related in-hospital, or post-discharge outcomes between IV continuous and intermittent bolus administration. Tailoring appropriate diuretic strategy to different states of acute HF and congestion phenotypes needs to be further investigated., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)