1. Comparison of intramuscular medetomidine versus medetomidine-vatinoxan sedation in bearded dragons (Pogonavitticeps).
- Author
-
Pinho RH, Reed M, Chapman K, and Pang DS
- Subjects
- Animals, Male, Injections, Intramuscular veterinary, Female, Quinolizines administration & dosage, Quinolizines pharmacology, Prospective Studies, Anesthetics, Combined administration & dosage, Anesthetics, Combined pharmacology, Conscious Sedation veterinary, Conscious Sedation methods, Medetomidine administration & dosage, Medetomidine pharmacology, Hypnotics and Sedatives administration & dosage, Hypnotics and Sedatives pharmacology, Cross-Over Studies, Lizards
- Abstract
Objective: To assess sedation following intramuscular (IM) administration of medetomidine versus medetomidine-vatinoxan in bearded dragons., Study Design: Prospective, randomized, experimental, crossover study., Animals: A group of 10 (five males and five females) bearded dragons (mean mass ± standard deviation 172 ± 28 g)., Methods: All animals were administered both medetomidine (0.2 mg kg
-1 ) (MED) and medetomidine (0.2 mg kg-1 )-vatinoxan (4 mg kg-1 ) (MED-VAT) IM, with a 14-16 day washout period between treatments. Sedation was assessed using an adapted version of a sedation scale for bearded dragons (scale range 0-12) before (T0), and every 5 minutes from 10 to 45 minutes after treatment administration (T10-T45). Sedation scores were compared: 1) between time points (within treatments) using a Friedman test and Dunn's post hoc test; and 2) between treatments at each time point using a Wilcoxon paired test. Heart rate and respiratory rate (fR ) were analyzed descriptively. At T45, atipamezole was administered IM., Results: Compared with T0, sedation scores were significantly higher at most time points for both treatments. Highest median (range) scores occurred at T30 for MED [T0, 0 (0-0); T30, 2.5 (1-5); p = 0.0001] and at T35 and T40 for MED-VAT [T0, 0 (0-0); T35, 2 (1-5); p = 0.002; T40, 2 (1-5); p = 0.001]. No significant differences in sedation scores were identified between treatments at any time point. The two protocols caused bradycardia and reduction in fR . All animals were active and ate 1 hour after reversal administration., Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: Both medetomidine and medetomidine-vatinoxan caused similar mild sedation in bearded dragons (median < 3/12). Inclusion of vatinoxan did not enhance sedation in this species., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF