1. Institutional Variation in Patient Radiation Doses During Transcatheter Valve Interventions: A Statewide Experience.
- Author
-
McNamara DA, Albright J, Sukul D, Chetcuti S, Forrest A, Grossman P, Alnajjar RM, Patel H, Gurm HS, and Madder RD
- Abstract
Background: Little is known about institutional radiation doses during transcatheter valve interventions., Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate institutional variability in radiation doses during transcatheter valve interventions., Methods: Using a large statewide registry, transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair, transcatheter mitral valve replacement, and transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedures between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022, with an air kerma (AK) recorded were analyzed. Patient and procedural characteristics were compared between cases with AK ≥2 and <2 Gy. Associations of variables with AK ≥2 Gy were investigated using Bayesian random effects modeling and median ORs for the performing hospital., Results: Among 9,446 procedures across 30 hospitals, median (Q1-Q3) procedural AK was 0.592 Gy (0.348-0.989 Gy) with AK ≥2 Gy in 533 cases (5.6%). Wide variation in procedural AK was observed, with an institutional frequency of AK ≥2 Gy ranging from 0.0% to 29.5%. Bayesian modeling identified the performing hospital as more strongly associated with the odds of a procedural AK ≥2 Gy than any patient or procedural factors (hospital median OR: 3.54 [95% credible interval: 2.52-16.66])., Conclusions: In a large, multicenter state-wide registry, there is wide institutional variability in patient-level radiation doses during transcatheter valve interventions, with the performing hospital having a higher odds of an AK ≥2 Gy than any patient or procedural factors. Future interventions are warranted to reduce procedural-related variation in radiation exposure., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Sukul receives salary support from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation for his role in quality improvement for the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2). Dr Chetcuti is a consultant for Medtronic. Dr Grossman receives registry support from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan; and receives research support from Medtronic Cardiovascular, Edwards Life Sciences, and the National Institutes of Health. Dr Alnajjar consults for Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic and Ethicon Surgical Technologies; is a proctor for Intuitive Surgical and Abbott; and serves on the advisory board for Ethicon Surgical Technologies. Dr Patel is a consultant for Medtronic. Dr Gurm receives institutional research support outside this work from Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan; is the cofounder of Amplitude Vascular Systems; has consulted for Osprey Medical and Amplitude Vascular Systems; owns equity in Amplitude Vascular Systems and Jiaxing Bossh Medical Technology Partnership; and is the chair of the clinical events committee for the PERFORMANCE trial sponsored by Contego Medical. Dr Madder has received speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Corindus, and Infraredx; has served as a consultant to Abbott Vascular, AngioWave Imaging, Corindus, Infraredx, RapidAI, and SpectraWAVE; has received research support from Corindus and Infraredx; and serves on the advisory boards of Medtronic and SpectraWAVE. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose. Data for this analysis were obtained from the Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium registry, which is funded by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF