Back to Search Start Over

Renal Function-Based Contrast Threshold Predicts Kidney Injury in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors :
Gualano SK
Seth M
Gurm HS
Sukul D
Chetcuti SJ
Patel HJ
Merhi W
Schwartz C
O'Neill WW
Shannon F
Grossman PM
Source :
Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions [J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv] 2022 May 19; Vol. 1 (3), pp. 100038. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 May 19 (Print Publication: 2022).
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) after contrast-guided interventions is associated with adverse outcomes, but the role of contrast in the context of renal function is less well described for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).<br />Methods: Patients from the Michigan TAVR registry between January 2016 and December 2019 were included. AKI was defined using Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 definitions. An integer cut point for the ratio of contrast volume (CV) to renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) as a predictor of AKI was calculated.<br />Results: Of 7112 cases, AKI occurred in 629 (8.8%) patients. Unadjusted mortality was higher among patients with AKI (32.5% vs 9.0%, P  ​< ​.0001). AKI remained significantly associated with the risk of mortality after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio = 4.50, P  ​< ​.001). Procedural characteristics associated with AKI included CV/eGFR >2 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.36, P = .003, 95% CI = 1.10-1.67), CV/eGFR >3 (aOR = 1.38, P  ​= ​.009, 95% CI = 1.09-1.77), and use of general anesthesia (aOR = 1.67, P  ​< ​.0001, 95% CI = 1.38-2.03).<br />Conclusions: CV in the context of renal function administrated during TAVR is a robust tool to predict AKI. AKI after TAVR is associated with an increased risk of mortality. Incorporation of thresholds of >2× and > 3× eGFR into procedural planning should be considered as a quality initiative.<br />Competing Interests: S. Gualano, W. Merhi, C. Schwartz, and F. Shannon have no disclosures. S. Chetcuti has been a consultant and proctor for Medtronic, with research support from 10.13039/100004374Medtronic, Gore, 10.13039/100008497Boston Scientific, 10.13039/100006520Edwards Lifesciences, and JenaValve. D. Sukul receives research funding from 10.13039/100001502Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. H. Patel is a consultant for Medtronic and WL Gore. H. Gurm receives research funding from 10.13039/100001502Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and the 10.13039/100000002National Institutes of Health Center for Accelerated Innovation and is a consultant for Osprey Medical. W. O’Neill is a consultant for Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, and Abiomed, with research grant support from Abiomed, 10.13039/100001316Abbott, 10.13039/100006520Edwards Lifesciences, and 10.13039/100004374Medtronic. P. Grossman is a consultant for Medtronic Cardiovascular, has research support from 10.13039/100004374Medtronic Cardiovascular, 10.13039/100006520Edwards Life Sciences, and 10.13039/100016476Cardiovascular Systems Incorporated, has registry support from 10.13039/100001502Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, and has research support from 10.13039/100000002National Institutes of Health. None of the authors have any conflicts directly relevant to this study.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2772-9303
Volume :
1
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39131953
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100038