1. Efficacy and safety of palliative treatment in patients with autoimmune liver disease-associated hepatocellular carcinoma.
- Author
-
Stern L, Schmidt C, Kocheise L, Joerg V, Casar C, Walter A, Drenth JPH, Papp M, Gatselis NK, Zachou K, Pinter M, Scheiner B, Vogel A, Kirstein MM, Finkelmeier F, Waidmann O, Weinmann A, Milkiewicz P, Thorburn D, Halliday N, Lleo A, Huber S, Dalekos GN, Lohse AW, Wege H, von Felden J, and Schulze K
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Aged, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Retrospective Studies, Aged, 80 and over, Europe, Hepatitis, Autoimmune complications, Hepatitis, Autoimmune drug therapy, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular therapy, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular mortality, Liver Neoplasms therapy, Chemoembolization, Therapeutic adverse effects, Palliative Care, Protein Kinase Inhibitors therapeutic use, Protein Kinase Inhibitors adverse effects
- Abstract
Introduction and Objectives: Autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) are rare causes hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and data on the efficacy and tolerability of anti-tumor therapies are scarce. This pan-European study aimed to assess outcomes in AILD-HCC patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) compared with patients with more common HCC etiologies, including viral, alcoholic or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease., Materials and Methods: 107 patients with HCC-AILD (AIH:55; PBC:52) treated at 13 European centres between 1996 and 2020 were included. 65 received TACE and 28 received TKI therapy. 43 (66 %) were female (median age 73 years) with HCC tumor stage BCLC A (34 %), B (46 %), C (9 %) or D (11 %). For each treatment type, propensity score matching was used to match AILD to non-AILD-HCC on a 1:1 basis, yielding in a final cohort of 130 TACE and 56 TKI patients for comparative analyses of median overall survival (mOS) and treatment tolerability., Results: HCC-AILD patients showed comparable mOS to controls for both TACE (19.5 vs. 22.1 months, p = 0.9) and TKI (15.4 vs. 15.1 months, p = 0.5). Adverse events were less frequent in AILD-HCC patients than controls (33 % % vs. 62 %, p = 0.003). For TKIs, there were no significant differences in adverse events (73% vs. 86%, p = 0.2) or interruption rates (44% vs. 36 %, p = 0.7)., Conclusions: In summary, this study demonstrates comparable mOS for AILD-HCC patients undergoing local and systemic treatments, with better tolerability than HCC of other causes. TKIs remain important therapeutic options for AILD-HCC patients, particularly given their exclusion from recent immunotherapy trials., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest A.L. reports receiving consulting fees from Advanz Pharma, AlfaSigma, Takeda, and Albireo Pharma, and speaker fees from Gilead, Abbvie, MSD, Intercept Pharma, AlfaSigma, GSK, and Incyte. BS received grant support from AstraZeneca and Eisai; speaker honoraria from Eisai; and travel support from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, and Gilead. MP received travel support from Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, and Roche; he is a consultant for AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, and Roche; and he received travel support from Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, and Roche. HW received consulting and speaker fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, Eisai, and Ipsen., (Copyright © 2024 Fundación Clínica Médica Sur, A.C. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF