Search

Background: In the phase III HIMALAYA study (NCT03298451) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus sorafenib; durvalumab monotherapy was noninferior to sorafenib for OS. Results reported herein are from a 4-year updated OS analysis of HIMALAYA., Patients and Methods: Participants with uHCC and no previous systemic treatment were randomized to STRIDE (n = 393), durvalumab (n = 389), or sorafenib (n = 389). The updated data cut-off was 23 January 2023. OS and serious adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Additionally, baseline characteristics and subsequent therapies were analyzed in long-term survivors (≥36 months beyond randomization)., Results: For STRIDE, durvalumab, and sorafenib, median [95% confidence interval (CI)] follow-up was 49.12 months (46.95-50.17 months), 48.46 months (46.82-49.81 months), and 47.31 months (45.08-49.15 months), respectively. OS hazard ratio (95% CI) for STRIDE versus sorafenib was 0.78 (0.67-0.92). The 36-month OS rate for STRIDE was 30.7% versus 19.8% for sorafenib. The 48-month OS rate remained higher for STRIDE at 25.2%, versus 15.1% for sorafenib. The long-term OS benefit of STRIDE was observed across clinically relevant subgroups and was further improved in participants who achieved disease control. Long-term survivors with STRIDE (n = 103) included participants across clinically relevant subgroups, and 57.3% (59/103) had no reported subsequent anticancer therapy. No new serious treatment-related AEs occurred with STRIDE from the primary analysis (17.5%; 68/388). Durvalumab maintained OS noninferiority to sorafenib and no late-onset safety signals were identified., Conclusions: These data represent the longest follow-up to date in phase III studies in uHCC. The unprecedented 3- and 4-year OS rates reinforce the sustained long-term OS benefit of STRIDE versus sorafenib. STRIDE maintained a tolerable yet differentiated safety profile from other current uHCC therapies. Results continue to support the long-term benefits of STRIDE in a diverse population, reflective of uHCC globally., Competing Interests: Disclosure BS reports consulting or advisory fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Incyte, IPSEN, Roche, Sirtex Medical, and Terumo; reports being an invited speaker for AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Incyte, IPSEN, Roche, and Sirtex Medical; research funding (to institution) from Bristol Myers Squibb and Sirtex Medical; and reports being a steering committee member for AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boston Scientific, and Roche. SLC reports advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Eisai, and MSD; reports being an invited speaker for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, IPSEN, MSD, and Roche; and research funding (to self) from Bayer, Eisai, IPSEN, MSD, and Sirtex Medical. RKK reports consulting or advisory fees from Agios, AstraZeneca, Exelixis, IPSEN, and MSD (to institution), and from Exact Sciences, IPSEN, Kinnate, Regeneron, and Tyra Biosciences (to self); and research funding (to institution) from Adaptimmune, Agios, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Genentech, Loxo Oncology, MSD, Novartis, Partner Therapeutics, QED, Relay Therapeutics, Roche Surface Oncology, and Taiho. GL reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca. MK reports being an invited speaker for Bayer, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, MSD, and Takeda; and research funding (to institution) from AbbVie, Chugai, EA Pharma, Eisai, GE HealthCare, Gilead Sciences, Otsuka, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Taiho, and Takeda. MY reports grant/research funding (to institution) from Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, and Incyte; and consulting or advisory fees from AstraZeneca, Eisai, Exelixis, Genentech, Hepion, and Replimune. MY is a co-founder of Adventris Pharmaceuticals and holds equity. ENDT reports honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb and Falk; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Eli Lilly, IPSEN, Mallinckrodt, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, and Terumo; research funding from Arqule, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, IPSEN, and Roche; travel expenses from Arqule, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celsion, and Roche; and is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim. JF reports grant/research funding from Astellas, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Incyte Japan, J-Pharma, Merck Bio, Mochida, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda, Sanofi, Sumitomo Dainippon Bayer, and Yakult Honsha; and consulting fees from Bayer, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, EA Pharma, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, Incyte Japan, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Mylan EPD, MSD, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sanofi, Servier Japan, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda, Teijin Pharma, and Yakult Honsha. YKK reports advisory board fees from ALX Oncology, Amgen, Blueprint, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daehwa, Marcrogenics, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Surface Oncology, and Zymeworks. PRG reports grant/research funding, and/or honoraria, from Adaptimmune, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boston Scientific, Eisai, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Guerbet, IPSEN, MSD, and Sirtex Medical. LR reports grant/research funding (to institution) from Agios, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Eisai, Exelixis, Fibrogen, Incyte, IPSEN, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Servier, and Zymeworks; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Elevar Therapeutics, Exelixis, Genenta, Hengrui, Incyte, IPSEN, IQVIA, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Servier, Taiho Oncology, and Zymeworks; honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Incyte, IPSEN, Merck Serono, Roche, and Servier; and travel expenses from AstraZeneca. AH reports consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Intercept, and IPSEN. VCT reports grant/research funding (to institution) from AstraZeneca, Eisai, IPSEN, and Roche; consulting fees from AstraZeneca and Incyte; and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Eisai, Incyte, IPSEN, Merck, and Roche. TVD reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Eisai, IPSEN, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Faber, Roche, and Taiho Pharmaceutical. SCT reports grant/research funding from AstraZeneca and Eisai; and consulting fees from AstraZeneca. VB reports advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, F. Hoffman-La Roche, and Merck; reports being an invited speaker for Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, F. Hoffman-La Roche, and Merck; and travel grants from Bayer Healthcare and F. Hoffman-La Roche. MR reports advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, IPSEN, Lilly, Roche, and Universal DX; reports being an invited speaker for Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, BTG, Eisai, Gilead Sciences, Lilly, and Roche; and grant/research funding from Bayer and IPSEN. MM, MJP, CG, JFK, and AN are employees of and shareholders in AstraZeneca. GKAA reports grant/research funding from Arcus, AstraZeneca, BioNtech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Flatiron, Genentech/Roche, Genoscience, Incyte, Polaris, Puma, QED, Silenseed, and Yiviva; and consulting fees from Adicet, Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Autem, Beigene, Berry Genomics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cend, CytomX, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Exelixis, Flatiron, Genentech/Roche, Genoscience, Helio, Helsinn, Incyte, IPSEN, Merck, Nerviano, Newbridge, Novartis, QED, Redhill, Rafael, Servier, Silenseed, Sobi, Vector, and Yiviva. GKAA also reports filed patent PCT/US2014/031545, filed: 24 March 2014, and priority application Serial No.: 61/804,907, filed: 25 March 2013. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Die Übersicht über die Interessenskonflikte der Autorinnen und Autoren ist im Leitlinienreport veröffentlicht.

Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Background: Increased understanding of how the immune system regulates tumor growth has innovated the use of immunotherapeutics to treat various cancers. The impact of such therapies, including programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, on the production of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) and their impact on outcomes, is poorly understood. This study aims to evaluate the clinical trial evidence on ADA incidence associated with PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 inhibitors in the treatment of cancer and to assess associations between treatment administered, ADA incidence, and treatment outcomes., Methods: Embase ® , Medline ® , and EBM Reviews were searched via the OVID ® platform on February 15, 2022. Conference proceedings, clinical trial registries, and global regulatory and reimbursement body websites were also searched. Eligible publications included clinical trials enrolling patients receiving cancer treatment with either PD-1, PD-L1, or CTLA-4 reporting outcomes including incidence or prevalence of ADAs and the impact of immunogenicity on treatment safety and efficacy. Reference lists of eligible publications were also searched. The review was conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and evidence quality assessment was conducted using the appropriate Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool., Results: After screening 4160 records and reviewing 97 full publications, a total of 34 publications reporting on 68 trials were included. A further 41 relevant clinical trials were identified on ClinicalTrials.gov and a further 32 from searches of packaging inserts. In total, 141 relevant trials covering 15 different checkpoint inhibitors and 16 different tumor types were included. Across the included trials, atezolizumab was associated with the highest incidence of ADAs (29.6% of 639 patients), followed by nivolumab (11.2% of 2,085 patients). Combination checkpoint inhibitor treatment appeared to increase the rate of ADAs versus monotherapy. Only 17 trials reported on the impact of ADAs on treatment outcomes with mixed results for the impact of ADAs on treatment efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics., Conclusions: Checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of cancer are immunogenic, with the incidence of treatment-emergent ADAs varying between individual therapies. It remains unclear what impact ADAs have on treatment outcomes., Competing Interests: Competing interests: KN and ZR were an employee of Eisai, USA. CRM and GSR of Mtech Access were paid consultants to Eisai. PG has received lecture fees and honoraria from BMS, Adaptimmune, AstraZeneca, Sirtex, MSD, Eisai, Ipsen, Bayer, Roche, Lilly, Boston Scientific, and Guerbet. DJP has received lecture fees from ViiV Healthcare, Bayer Healthcare, BMS, Roche, Eisai, Falk Foundation; travel expenses from BMS and Bayer Healthcare; consulting fees from Mina Therapeutics, Eisai, Roche, Ipsen, Mursla, Starpharma, Avamune, DaVolterra, and Astra Zeneca; and research funding (to institution) from MSD, GSK, and BMS. RSF has acted as a consultant to AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, CStone, Exelixis, Eisai, Merck, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, and has received grants (to institution) from Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Merck, Pfizer, and Roche/Genentech., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass die Interessenkonflikte im Leitlinienreport dargelegt sind.

Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Background: Liver cirrhosis is a major cause of death worldwide. Cirrhosis develops after a long asymptomatic period of fibrosis progression, with the diagnosis frequently occurring late, when major complications or cancer develop. Few reliable tools exist for timely identification of individuals at risk of cirrhosis to allow for early intervention. We aimed to develop a novel score to identify individuals at risk for future liver-related outcomes., Methods: We derived the LiverRisk score from an international prospective cohort of individuals from six countries without known liver disease from the general population, who underwent liver fibrosis assessment by transient elastography. The score included age, sex, and six standard laboratory variables. We created four groups: minimal risk, low risk, medium risk, and high risk according to selected cutoff values of the LiverRisk score (6, 10, and 15). The model's discriminatory accuracy and calibration were externally validated in two prospective cohorts from the general population. Moreover, we ascertained the prognostic value of the score in the prediction of liver-related outcomes in participants without known liver disease with median follow-up of 12 years (UK Biobank cohort)., Findings: We included 14 726 participants: 6357 (43·2%) in the derivation cohort, 4370 (29·7%) in the first external validation cohort, and 3999 (27·2%) in the second external validation cohort. The score accurately predicted liver stiffness in the development and external validation cohorts, and was superior to conventional serum biomarkers of fibrosis, as measured by area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC; 0·83 [95% CI [0·78-0·89]) versus the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4; 0·68 [0·61-0·75] at 10 kPa). The score was effective in identifying individuals at risk of liver-related mortality, liver-related hospitalisation, and liver cancer, thereby allowing stratification to different risk groups for liver-related outcomes. The hazard ratio for liver-related mortality in the high-risk group was 471 (95% CI 347-641) compared with the minimal risk group, and the overall AUC of the score in predicting 10-year liver-related mortality was 0·90 (0·88-0·91) versus 0.84 (0·82-0·86) for FIB-4., Interpretation: The LiverRisk score, based on simple parameters, predicted liver fibrosis and future development of liver-related outcomes in the general population. The score might allow for stratification of individuals according to liver risk and thus guide preventive care., Funding: European Commission under the H20/20 programme; Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria de Salud; Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness; the European Regional Development Fund; and the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests PN reports grants from Novo Nordisk and has received consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, Intercept, Poxel Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Pfizer, Sun Pharma, Madrigal and GSK. He also reports honoraria as a speaker for Novo Nordisk and AiCME; upport for attending meetings from for Novo Nordisk; and participation on an advisory board for Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, Intercept, Poxel Pharmaceuticals, BMS, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, Madrigal, and GSK. AK reports grants from EU Horizon 2020, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Danish National Research Foundation, Region of Southern Denmark; royalties or licenses from Gyldendal; has served as speaker for Norgine, Siemens and Nordic Bioscience; patents from Region of Southern Denmark and University of Southern Denmark; has participated in advisory boards for Norgine and Siemens; has been Vice Secretary European Association for the Study of The Liver (EASL); and received other services from Norgine, Siemens and Echosens. LC has served as speaker for Echosens and Nordic Bioscience; and received consulting fees from Echosens, Madrigal, MSD, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Sagimet. LaC reports a grant from Gilead, has received consulting fees from Echosens, Madrigal, MSD, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Sagimet; and payment as a speaker for Echosens and Novo Nordisk. AMA reports a grant from Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Target Pharma; and has received consulting fees from Novo Nordisk. RJdK reports a grant from GSK, Gilead, Janssen, Inventiva, and Echosens; has served as speaker for Abbvie, Gilead, and Echosens; and has received consulting fees from Abbvie and Gilead. NF has received consulting fees from Gilead. PGa has served as speaker for Bayer, Adaptimmune, Sirtex, Lilly, Roche and Ipsen; and received consulting fees from Bayer, Boston Scientific, AstraZeneca, Adaptimmune, BMS, Eisai, MSD, Sirtex, Lilly, Roche, Guerbet, and Ipsen. IGr participated in advisory boards for GE healthcare; and has served as speaker for Roche and Siemens. ING reports a grant from Gilead. RuH served as speaker for the American Gastroenterological Association and was a manuscript reviewer for GUT; reports support for lectures at the University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; and was an external advisor for LiverHope 2020. He also participated in the Steering committee of AASLD-ACLF Special interest Group and Practice Guidelines Committee of AGA. PK reports a grant from Sequana; royalty for UpToDate; honorarium as an Associate Editor for Gastroenterology; and support for attending meeting of EASL and INASL. TK served as speaker for Gilead; has received consulting fees from Albireo and MSD; was a board member at Biomed Alliance; and reports a relationship of stock or stock option with Ultimovacs. JMP reports grants from the European Commission (EFPIA IMI2 853966-2 ISCIII PI19/01898, EFPIA IMI2 777377 ISCIII PI22/01770, and H2020 847989) and Ajuntament de Barcelona-Fundació La Caixa; served as speaker for Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and FLS; and received consulting fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, MSD, and Novo Nordisk. He also received support from Rubió and NovoNordisk. SP reports a grant from the European Association for the Study of the Liver and the Italian Ministry of Health; received consulting fees from Protein Plasma Therapeutics Assocation and Resolution Therapeutics; and served as speaker for Grifols. He participated in an advisory board of Mallinckrodt. JS reports grants from Gilead Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Siemens Healthcare; served as speaker for Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, MedPublico GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Histoindex, and MedPublico; received consulting fees from Apollo Endosurgery, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen, Inventiva Pharma, Madrigal, MSD, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Siemens Healthineers; and reports stock or stock options with AGED diagnostics and Hepta Bio. MSB reports a grant from LiverRisk score. MTh is supported by a grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF20OC0059393); and served as speaker for Echosens, Siemens Healthcare, Tillotts Pharma, and Norgine; received consulting fees from Ge Healthcare; reports scientific advisory board membership for ID-LIVER (research project); and is a board member of Alcohol & Society (non-governmental organisation, Denmark). VW-SW reports a grant from Gilead Sciences served as speaker for Abbott, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Novo Nordisk, and Unilab; reports support from Gilead Sciences; has stock options from Illuminatio Medical Technology; and has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Inventiva, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sagimet Biosciences, TARGET PharmaSolutions. MGR reports a grant from Gliead Sciences; served as speaker for Gilead, Abbvie, and Advanz; and reports support from Gilead and Abbvie. DR received honoraria as speaker from Gilead and Abbvie; and received support for meetings and travel from Gilead and AbbVie. PG has received research funding from Gilead, Mallinckrodt, Grifols, and Ferring. PG has consulted or attended advisory boards for Grifols SA, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, Intercept, Martin Pharmaceuticals, Promethera, Sequana, RallyBio, SeaBeLife Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD), and Behring; and received speaking fees from Pfizer. RMM has received honoraria as speaker from Gilead, Abbvie, and Advanz; reports support from Gilead, Abbvie, and Advanz and participated in an advisory board of Advanz. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This article summarises expert discussion on the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which took place during the 24th World Gastrointestinal Cancer Congress (WGICC) in Barcelona, July 2022. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory to ensure an optimal diagnosis and staging of HCC, planning of curative and therapeutic options, including surgical, embolisation, ablative strategies, or systemic therapy. Furthermore, in many patients with HCC, underlying liver cirrhosis represents a challenge and influences the therapeutic options., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Die Übersicht über die Interessenskonflikte der Autorinnen und Autoren ist im Leitlinienreport veröffentlicht.

Competing Interests: Die Übersicht über die Interessenskonflikte der Autorinnen und Autoren ist im Leitlinienreport veröffentlicht.

Competing Interests: Die Übersicht über die Interessenkonflikte der Autorinnen und Autoren sind im Leitlinienreport veröffentlicht.

Competing Interests: Die Übersicht über die Interessenkonflikte der Autorinnen und Autoren sind im Leitlinienreport veröffentlicht.

Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Background: ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) is a novel type of extracorporeal albumin dialysis and holds promise to sustain liver function and recovery of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Previously, ADVOS was tested as continuous treatment for intensive care patients with liver failure. Data related to the applicability and safety as discontinuous treatment outside of ICU is not available., Aim: Evaluation of ADVOS as discontinuous treatment for patients with ACLF outside intensive care unit and comparison with a matched historic cohort., Methods and Results: In this retrospective study, 26 patients with ACLF and the indication for renal replacement therapy related to HRS-AKI were included. Majority of patients were male (65%) with alcoholic cirrhosis in 88% and infections as a trigger of ACLF in 96%. Liver function was severely compromised reflected by high median MELD and CLIF-C ACLF scores of 37 (IQR 32;40) and 56.5 (IQR 51;60), respectively. Patients were treated discontinuously with ADVOS over a median time of 12 days (IQR 8.25;17) and received 8 (IQR 4.25;9.75) treatment cycles on average. No treatment related adverse events were recorded, and safety laboratory parameters remained constant during the observation time. After 16 h cumulative dialysis therapy, ADVOS significantly reduced protein-bound bilirubin (14%), creatinine (11.8%) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN, 33%). Using a matched cohort with ACLF treated with hemodialysis, ADVOS achieved a stronger decrease in bilirubin (p = 0.01), while detoxification of water-soluble catabolites' including creatinine and BUN was comparable. The 28-days mortality in the ADVOS group was 56% (14/26) and was not inferior to predicted survival (predicted median 28-days mortality was 44%, IQR 30; 59)., Conclusion: Discontinuous ADVOS treatment was safe and effective in patients with ACLF outside intensive care and outperformed hemodialysis in reducing protein-bound metabolites., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Recent years have seen significant progress in the systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including the advent of immunotherapy. While several large phase III trials have provided the evidence for a multi-line treatment paradigm, they have focused on a highly selected group of patients by excluding potentially confounding comorbidities. As a result, high quality evidence for the systemic treatment of HCC in patients with various comorbidities is missing. This review summarises current knowledge on the use of approved medicines in patients with HIV, autoimmune disease, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, fibrolamellar HCC, mixed HCC-cholangiocarcinoma, decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh B and C), a significant bleeding history, vascular invasion or portal vein thrombosis, as well as the elderly, those on haemodialysis, and those after solid organ transplantation. The article highlights relevant knowledge gaps and current clinical challenges. To improve the safety and efficacy of HCC treatment in these subgroups, future trials should be designed to specifically include patients with comorbidities., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest LR reports receiving consulting fees from Amgen, ArQule, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Eisai, Exelixis, Genenta, Hengrui, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Sanofi; lectures fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Eisai, Gilead, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Roche, Sanofi; travel fees from Ipsen; and institutional research funding from Agios, ARMO BioSciences, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Eisai, Exelixis, Fibrogen, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Zymeworks. NP reports receiving consulting fees from Amgen, Merck Serono, Servier; lectures fees from AbbVie, Gilead, Lilly; travel fees from Amgen, ArQule; and institutional research funding from Basilea, Merck Serono, Servier. CC reports receiving consulting fees from MSD and lectures fees from EISAI. FF reports receiving consulting fees from Roche; lectures fees from Lilly and Pfizer. PRG reports receiving consulting and lectures fees from Adaptimmune, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Roche, Sirtex. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2020 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The multikinase inhibitor sorafenib was the only approved systemic therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (hcc) for about a decade. In recent years, the number of approved agents has increased significantly as a result of a number of positive phase iii clinical trials. Lenvatinib as a first-line treatment, and regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab in the second-line setting are now approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (fda) and the European Medicines Agency. In phase ii studies, immunotherapy with nivolumab and monotherapy using pembrolizumab yielded impressive results for overall survival in therapy-naïve and pretreated patients, leading to the accelerated approval by the fda of nivolumab and pembrolizumab for second-line treatment. However, phase iii trials of nivolumab in the first line and pembrolizumab in the second line as single agents failed to reach statistical significance, although clinical benefit for a subset of patients with long durations of response could be demonstrated. Despite that setback, immunotherapy for hcc is a promising therapeutic approach, and the combination of immunotherapy with other treatment modalities such as monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or local therapies has the potential to increase the overall response rate and survival. Recently, the results of a phase iii trial of combination atezolizumab-bevacizumab compared with sorafenib showed a highly significant survival benefit and median overall survival that was not reached in the immunotherapy arm, making the combination the preferred standard of care in first-line therapy. Despite the impressive results and generally good toxicity profile of immunotherapy, patients who respond to therapy constitute only a subset of the overall population, and response rates are still limited. This review focuses on the currently reported results and ongoing clinical trials of checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy in hcc., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES We have read and understood Current Oncology’s policy on disclosing conflicts of interest, and we declare the following interests: AW has received lecture fees from Bayer, Leo Pharma, and Eisai, and has received advisory board fees and travel support from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squib, and Wako Diagnostics. PRG has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Hoffmann–La Roche, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and Sirtex Medical., (2020 Multimed Inc.)

Resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is a potential curative treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with liver-limited disease (LLD). Although long-term survival improved considerably within the last decades, high recurrence rates of 50-75% after resection remain a major challenge.Tecemotide (L-BLP25) is an antigen-specific cancer vaccine inducing immunity against mucin-1 (MUC1). The LICC trial aimed to improve survival in patients with mCRC after R0/R1 resection of CRLM. LICC was a binational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 2 study including patients with R0/R1 resected CRLM without evidence of metastatic disease outside the liver. Co-primary endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 3-year overall survival (OS) rate, secondary endpoints were RFS and OS in subgroups with different MUC1 expression and safety. In total, 121 patients were 2:1 randomized between Oct 2011 and Dec 2014to receive tecemotide (N=79) or placebo (N=42). Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Median RFS was 6.1 months (95% CI 4.5-8.9) and 11.4 months (95% CI 3.7-21.2) ( P = .1754), 3-year OS rate 69.1% and 79.1%, median OS 62.8 months and not reached in the tecemotide vs. placebo arm ( P = .2141), respectively. Cox regression models revealed no dependence of RFS or OS on MUC1 expression. The most common tecemotide-related grade 3/4 adverse events were diarrhea, injection site reaction, intestinal perforation, peritonitis and tinnitus (1.3% each). The LICC trial failed to meet its primary endpoints of significantly improving RFS and OS with tecemotide. However, both arms showed unexpectedly long OS. MUC1 expression was not associated with outcome.EudraCT No: 2011-000218-20Clinical Trial Information: NCT01462513Financial Support: Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany., Abbreviations: AE: adverse event; CP: cyclophosphamide; CRC: colorectal cancer; CT: computed tomography; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FU: follow-up; HR: hazard ratio; IHC: immunohistochemical staining; ITT: intention-to-treat; DSMB: Data Safety Monitoring Board; LLD: liver-limited disease; mCRC: metastatic colorectal cancer; MPLA: monophosphoryl lipid; AMRI: magnetic resonance imaging; MUC1: mucin 1; NA: not applicable; NCI-CTCAE: National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; NS: normal saline; NSCLC: non-small-cell lung carcinoma; OS: overall surviva; lPP: per protocol; RAS: Rat sarcoma; RFS: recurrence-free survival; TEAE: treatment-emergent adverse event; UICC: Union for International Cancer Control; US: ultrasound; vs.: versus., (© 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.)

Background: In past decades, liver transplant (LT) patients were not routinely screened for hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection, and thus it might have been misdiagnosed as an acute rejection episode. Our aim was to analyze a real-world cohort of LT patients who presented with at least 1 episode of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and suffered from persistent elevated transaminases, to evaluate the frequency of HEV infection misdiagnosed as a rejection episode., Methods: Data from 306 patients transplanted between 1997 and 2017, including 565 liver biopsies, were analyzed. Biopsies from patients suffering from hepatitis C (n = 79; 25.8%) and from patients who presented with a Rejection Activity Index <5 (n = 134; 43.8%) were excluded. A subgroup of 74 patients (with 134 BPAR) with persistently elevated liver enzymes was chosen for further HEV testing., Results: Positive HEV IgG was detectable in 18 of 73 patients (24.7%). Positive HEV RNA was diagnosed in 3 of 73 patients with BPAR (4.1%). Patients with HEV infection showed no difference in etiology of the liver disease, type of immunosuppression, or median Rejection Activity Index., Conclusion: Few HEV infections were misdiagnosed as acute rejection episodes in this real-world cohort. Thus, HEV infection is an infrequent diagnosis in cases with persistent elevated liver enzymes and BPAR after LT., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and alcohol-related liver disease pose an important challenge to current clinical healthcare pathways because of the large number of at-risk patients. Therefore, we aimed to explore the cost-effectiveness of transient elastography (TE) as a screening method to detect liver fibrosis in a primary care pathway., Methods: Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using real-life individual patient data from 6 independent prospective cohorts (5 from Europe and 1 from Asia). A diagnostic algorithm with conditional inference trees was developed to explore the relationships between liver stiffness, socio-demographics, comorbidities, and hepatic fibrosis, the latter assessed by fibrosis scores (FIB-4, NFS) and liver biopsies in a subset of 352 patients. We compared the incremental cost-effectiveness of a screening strategy against standard of care alongside the numbers needed to screen to diagnose a patient with fibrosis stage ≥F2., Results: The data set encompassed 6,295 participants (mean age 55 ± 12 years, BMI 27 ± 5 kg/m 2 , liver stiffness 5.6 ± 5.0 kPa). A 9.1 kPa TE cut-off provided the best accuracy for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (≥F2) in general population settings, whereas a threshold of 9.5 kPa was optimal for populations at-risk of alcohol-related liver disease. TE with the proposed cut-offs outperformed fibrosis scores in terms of accuracy. Screening with TE was cost-effective with mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranging from 2,570 €/QALY (95% CI 2,456-2,683) for a population at-risk of alcohol-related liver disease (age ≥45 years) to 6,217 €/QALY (95% CI 5,832-6,601) in the general population. Overall, there was a 12% chance of TE screening being cost saving across countries and populations., Conclusions: Screening for liver fibrosis with TE in primary care is a cost-effective intervention for European and Asian populations and may even be cost saving., Lay Summary: The lack of optimized public health screening strategies for the detection of liver fibrosis in adults without known liver disease presents a major healthcare challenge. Analyses from 6 independent international cohorts, with transient elastography measurements, show that a community-based risk-stratification strategy for alcohol-related and non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases is cost-effective and potentially cost saving for our healthcare systems, as it leads to earlier identification of patients., (Copyright © 2019 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Inhibition of tumor growth factor-β (TGF-β) receptor type I potentiated the activity of sorafenib in preclinical models of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Galunisertib is a small-molecule selective inhibitor of TGF-β1 receptor type I, which demonstrated activity in a phase 2 trial as second-line HCC treatment., Methods: The combination of galunisertib and sorafenib (400 mg BID) was tested in patients with advanced HCC and Child-Pugh A liver function without prior systemic therapy. Galunisertib dose was administered 80 or 150 mg b.i.d. orally for 14 days every 28 days in safety lead-in cohorts; in the expansion cohort, all patients received galunisertib 150 mg b.i.d. Objectives included time-to-tumor progression, changes in circulating alpha fetoprotein and TGF-β1, safety, overall survival (OS), response rate, and pharmacokinetics (PK)., Results: Patients (n = 47) were enrolled from 5 non-Asian countries; 3 and 44 patients received the 80 mg and 150 mg b.i.d. doses of galunisertib, respectively. The pharmacokinetics and safety profiles were consistent with monotherapy of each drug. For the 150 mg b.i.d. galunisertib cohort, the median time-to-tumor progression was 4.1 months; the median OS was 18.8 months. A partial response was seen in 2 patients, stable disease in 21, and progressive disease in 13. TGF-β1 responders (decrease of >20% from baseline) vs nonresponders had longer OS (22.8 vs 12.0 months, P = 0.038)., Discussion: The combination of galunisertib and sorafenib showed acceptable safety and a prolonged OS outcome.

Background: Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and HE grade 1 (HE1) according to the West Haven criteria have recently been grouped as one entity named-covert HE- (CHE). Data regarding the impact of CHE on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and sleep quality are controversial., Aim: First, to determine whether CHE affects HRQoL and sleep quality of cirrhotic patients and second, whether minimal HE (MHE) and HE1 affect HRQoL and sleep quality to a comparable extent., Methods: A total of 145 consecutive cirrhotic patients were enrolled. HE1 was diagnosed clinically according to the West Haven criteria. Critical flicker frequency and the Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score were used to detect MHE. Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) was used to assess HRQoL and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was applied to assess sleep quality., Results: Covert HE was detected in 59 (40.7%) patients (MHE: n = 40; HE1: n = 19). Multivariate analysis identified CHE (P < 0.001) and female gender (P = 0.006) as independent predictors of reduced HRQoL (CLDQ total score). CHE (P = 0.021), low haemoglobin (P = 0.024) and female gender (P = 0.003) were identified as independent predictors of poor sleep quality (PSQI total score). Results of CLDQ and PSQI were comparable in patients with HE1 and MHE (CLDQ: 4.6 ± 0.9 vs 4.5 ± 1.2, P = 0.907; PSQI: 11.3 ± 3.8 vs 9.9 ± 5.0, P = 0.3)., Conclusion: Covert HE was associated with impaired HRQoL and sleep quality. MHE and HE1 affected both outcomes to a comparable extent supporting the use of CHE as a clinically useful term for patients with both entities of HE in clinical practice., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Cardiovascular disease is a serious problem of liver transplant (LT) recipients because of increased cardiovascular risk due to immunosuppressive therapy, higher age, intraoperative risk and comorbidities (such as diabetes and nicotine abuse). Reported frequency of cardiovascular events after LT shows a high variability between different LT cohorts. Our aim was to analyze a cohort of LT recipients from a single center in Germany to evaluate frequency of the cardiovascular endpoints (CVE) myocardial infarction and/or cardiac death after LT and to investigate correlations of CVE post LT with pretransplant patient characteristics., Patients: In total, data from 352 LT patients were analyzed. Patients were identified from an administrative transplant database, and all data were retrieved from patients' charts and reports., Results: During the median follow-up of 4.0 (0-13) years, 10 cases of CVE were documented (six myocardial infarctions and four coronary deaths). The frequency of CVE did not differ according to classic cardiovascular risk factors such as body mass index (p=0.071), total cholesterol (p=0.533), hypertension (p=0.747), smoking (p=1.000) and pretransplant diabetes mellitus (p=0.146). In patients with pretransplant coronary heart disease (n=24; 6.8%) CVE were found more frequently (p=0.024)., Conclusion: In summary, we found a rate of 2.8% CVE after LT in a German transplant cohort. Pretransplant CHD was the only risk factor for CVE, but showed no significant impact on overall survival., (Copyright © 2017 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly malignant tumor and is the most common cause of death in patients with underlying liver cirrhosis. The main risk factor for development of HCC is liver cirrhosis. Because of the increasing frequency of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, the incidence of HCC is also expected to considerably rise in Western countries in upcoming years. Identification and surveillance of patients at risk is crucial because curative treatment approaches can only be applied at early stages of the disease. Due to underlying liver cirrhosis, therapeutic strategies are limited and require intense interdisciplinary cooperation and multimodal approaches. However, a strong morphological and genetic heterogeneity of HCC remains a major challenge for development of new treatment modalities and demands personalized precision medicine approaches in order to improve patient outcome.

With the approval of new direct acting antiviral agents (DAA), therapeutic options for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are now generally available before and after liver transplantation (LT). Interferon-free DAA regimens are highly effective therapies and provide a good safety profile. However, the body of clinical evidence in this patient population is limited and the best treatment strategies for patients on the waiting list with (de)compensated cirrhosis and after LT are not well defined. The following recommendations for antiviral therapy in the context of LT are based on the currently available literature and clinical experience of experts in the field, and have been discussed in an expert meeting. The aim of this article is to guide clinicians in the decision making when treating patients before and after LT with DAAs., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background & Aims: GALAD and BALAD-2 are statistical models for estimating the likelihood of the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in individual patients with chronic liver disease and the survival of patients with HCC, respectively. Both models use objective measures, particularly the serum markers α-fetoprotein (AFP), AFP-L3, and des-γ-carboxyprothrombin. We aimed to validate these models in an international cohort of patients with HCC and assess their clinical performance., Methods: We collected data on cancer diagnosis and outcomes of 6834 patients (2430 with HCC and 4404 with chronic liver disease) recruited from Germany, Japan, and Hong Kong. We also collected data from 229 patients with other hepatobiliary tract cancers (cholangiocarcinoma or pancreatic adenocarcinoma) and 92 healthy individuals (controls). For reference, the original UK cohort (on which the GALAD model initially was built and BALAD-2 was validated) was included in the analysis. We assessed the effects of tumor size and etiology on GALAD model performance, and its ability to correctly discriminate HCC from other hepatobiliary cancers. We assessed the performance of BALAD-2 in patients with different stages of HCC., Results: In all cohorts, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), quantifying the ability of GALAD to discriminate patients with HCC from patients with chronic liver disease, was greater than 0.90-similar to the series on which the model originally was built (AUROC, 0.97). GALAD discriminated patients with HCC from those with other hepatobiliary cancers with an AUROC value of 0.95; values were slightly lower for patients with small unifocal HCCs, ranging from 0.85 to 0.95. Etiology and treatment of chronic viral hepatitis had no effect on the performance of this model. BALAD-2 analysis assigned patients with HCC to 4 distinct prognostic groups-overall and when patients were stratified according to disease stage., Conclusions: We validated the performance of the GALAD and BALAD-2 models for the diagnosis of HCC and predicting patient survival, respectively (based on levels of the serum markers AFP, AFP-L3, and des-γ-carboxyprothrombin), in an international cohort of almost 7000 patients. These systems might be used in HCC surveillance and determination of patient prognosis., (Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) is commonly diagnosed in patients with symptoms of reflux. The aim of the present study was to determine whether high-definition endoscopy (HD) plus equipped with the iScan function or chromoendoscopy with Lugol's solution might permit the differentiation of NERD patients from those without reflux symptoms, proven by targeted biopsies of endoscopic lesions. A total of 100 patients without regular intake of proton pump inhibitors and with a normal conventional upper endoscopy were prospectively divided into NERD patients and controls. A second upper endoscopy was performed using HD+ with additional iScan function and then Lugol's solution was applied. Biopsy specimens were taken from the gastroesophageal junction in all patients. A total of 65 patients with reflux symptoms and 27 controls were included. HD(+) endoscopy with iScan revealed subtle mucosal breaks in 52 patients; the subsequent biopsies confirmed esophagitis in all cases. After Lugol's solution, 58 patients showed mucosal breaks. Sensitivity for the iScan procedure was 82.5%, whereas that for Lugol's solution was 92.06%. Excellent positive predictive values of 100% and 98.3%, respectively, were noted. The present study suggests that the majority of patients with NERD and typical symptoms of reflux disease can be identified by iScan or Lugol's chromoendoscopy as minimal erosive reflux disease (ERD) patients., (© 2014 International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.)

Direct acting antivirals (DAAs) have increased cure rates for chronic hepatitis C infection up to nearly 100 %. At the same time treatment costs have risen significantly. Treating all HCV infected patients in Germany with DAAs would generate medication costs ranging between 19 and 37 billion EUR depending on the drug regimen used. Expenses in patients who fail to respond to treatment would amount to approximately 0.9 to 2.15 billion EUR. In difficult to treat patient populations that are characterized by prior failure to treatment or advanced liver disease, lost drug expenses are particularly high due to lower cure rates and longer treatment duration. Outcome-based reimbursement schemes are used to improve the quality of care and to reduce costs in the health care system. In Germany, disease management programs have been implemented for defined chronic diseases. However, drug reimbursement is still based on packages sold (pay for pill). In this context, it would be appealing to link reimbursement and treatment success (pay for cure) in order to reward successful treatment, limit lost drug spending and develop a shared risk environment that would involve all concerned parties. Under the assumption that 20,000 patients with HCV are treated each year in Germany and that cure rates are 95.4 %, the saved treatment costs would amount up to 45 and 107 million EUR per year. By this approach, economic incentives to withhold therapy from difficult to treat patients could be avoided., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: The influence of NODAT on survival of liver transplant recipients has not been clarified. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of NODAT on survival in LT recipients., Methods: Data from 352 LT patients were totally analyzed. 97 patients with pretransplant diabetes mellitus were excluded, and 255 patients without diabetes mellitus at time of transplantation were included., Results: NODAT was diagnosed in 41 patients (16.1%). There was no difference in frequency of NODAT according to the etiology of liver cirrhosis. NODAT was associated with a higher body weight (p=0.004) and BMI (p=0.002) 5years after LT, but not with weight gain (p=0.201) or increase in BMI (p=0.335) 5years after LT. HbA1c 5years after LT was significantly higher in patients with NODAT (p=0.001), but mean HbA1c still remained lower than 6.5% (6.4(±1.2) %). Patients with NODAT showed better survival rates (log rank: p=0.002) compared to LT recipients without diabetes. According to all existing knowledge of diabetes mellitus (DM) better survival cannot be a direct effect of this disease. Our results are rather influenced by an not known confounding factor (possibly recovery from cachexia) associated with better survival and NODAT, while complications of NODAT will not appear during the relatively short postoperative time and observation period (mean follow up 6.08 (±2.67) years)., Conclusion: NODAT is frequently diagnosed in LT recipients and is associated with an improved 5year survival after LT due to a not exactly known confounding factor., (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Purpose: To assess rate of late presentation with HIV in Southwestern Germany and to identify patient characteristics correlated with CD4 nadir., Methods: Patients with primary diagnosis who presented to one of ten participating clinics rated on knowledge and behavior towards HIV testing on a self-developed questionnaire, whereas clinical data was assessed by the physician., Results: 161 patients were included. Risk factors were homosexual (59.5 %) or heterosexual contacts (26.8 %), drug use (2.0 %), migration (3.9 %), or others (7.8 %). 63.5 % had a CD4 T cell count < 350/µl. 52.5, 17.4, and 31.1 % were diagnosed in CDC stadium A, B or C, respectively. 209 disease episodes were reported, from whom 83.7 % had led to the diagnosis of HIV. 75.2 and 68.3 % said to have been well-informed about ways of transmission and testing offerings, respectively, and 20.4 % admitted to have psychologically repressed the possibility of being infected. 48 patients rated their personal behavioral risk as "high" or "very high". Of these, however, only ten had performed at test in the precedent year. Performing a regression analysis, younger age and previous testing were correlated with a higher CD4 T cell nadir (p = 0.005, and 0.018, resp.)., Conclusion: The rate of late presentation in this region was even higher compared to national or European surveys. Most infected patients perceived to have had only a low risk. Several disease episodes did not lead to the initiation of HIV testing by the physician.

Apoptosis signaling is involved in both physiological tissue homeostasis and acute and chronic diseases. The role of regulatory apoptosis signaling molecules and their organ-specific functions are less defined. Therefore, we investigated the loss of the anti-apoptotic cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (cFLIP) and the mechanisms of the resulting lethal organ failure in vivo using inducible knockout mice. These were generated by crossing floxed cFLIP mice to a tamoxifen inducible Rosa26-creERT2 mouse strain. Death following global loss of cFLIP resulted from liver failure, accumulation of M1-polarized macrophages and accompanying hepatic cell death and inflammation. Apoptosis was also prominent in immune cells, the kidney and intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) but not in cardiomyocytes. Cellular injury led to the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and the induction of innate immune receptors including toll-like receptors (TLRs) 4 and 9, and stimulator of interferon genes (STING). Transplantation of bone marrow with intact cFLIP or depletion of macrophages prevented the phenotype of acute liver failure. Interestingly, compound deletion of cFLIP in bone marrow-derived cells and hepatocytes did not promote organ failure. Thus, cFLIP exerts a critical role in tissue homeostasis by preventing the activation of monocytic cells and innate immunity, which causes cell death and inflammation in susceptible tissues. These results encourage the development of organ-specific anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory therapies in acute organ failure.

Objective: Follistatin-like 3 (fstl3), a natural inhibitor of members of the TGF-β family, increases during resistance training in human plasma. Fstl3 primarily binds myostatin and activin A, and thereby inhibits their functions. We hypothesize that blocking myostatin and activin A signalling through systemic fstl3 over-expression protects against diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance., Methods: Fstl3 was over-expressed by DNA electrotransfer in tibialis anterior, quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles in female C57BL/C mice, and the mice were subsequently randomized to chow or high-fat feeding. Body weight, food intake, fat accumulation by MR scanning, and glucose, insulin and glucagon tolerance were evaluated, as was the response in body weight and metabolic parameters to 24h fasting. Effects of fstl3 on pancreatic insulin and glucagon content, and pancreatic islet morphology were determined., Results: Fstl3 over-expression reduced fat accumulation during high-fat feeding by 16%, and liver fat by 50%, as determined by MRI. No changes in body weight were observed, while the weight of the transfected muscles increased by 10%. No transcriptional changes were found in the subcutaneous adipose tissue. Fstl3 mice displayed improved insulin sensitivity and muscle insulin signalling. In contrast, glucose tolerance was impaired in high-fat fed fstl3 mice, which was explained by increased hepatic glucagon sensitivity and glucose output, as well as a decrease in the pancreatic insulin/glucagon ratio. Accordingly, fstl3 transfection improved counter-regulation to 24h fasting., Conclusion: Fstl3 over-expression regulates insulin and glucagon sensitivities through increased muscular insulin action, as well as increased hepatic glucagon sensitivity and pancreatic glucagon content., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Since sorafenib has shown activity in different tumour types and gemcitabine regimens improved the outcome for biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients, we evaluated first-line gemcitabine plus sorafenib in a double-blind phase II study., Patients and Methods: 102 unresectable or metastatic BTC patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of gallbladder or intrahepatic bile ducts, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2 were randomised to gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 once weekly, first 7-weeks+1-week rest followed by once 3-weeks+1-week rest) plus sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) or placebo. Treatment continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumour samples were prospectively stained for sorafenib targets and potential biomarkers. Serum samples (first two cycles) were measured for vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) and stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF1)α by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)., Results: Gemcitabine plus sorafenib was generally well tolerated. Four and three patients achieved partial responses in the sorafenib and placebo groups, respectively. There was no difference in the primary end-point, median progression-free survival (PFS) for gemcitabine plus sorafenib versus gemcitabine plus placebo (3.0 versus 4.9 months, P=0.859), and no difference for median overall survival (OS) (8.4 versus 11.2 months, P=0.775). Patients with liver metastasis after resection of primary BTC survived longer with sorafenib (P=0.019) compared to placebo. Patients who developed hand-foot syndrome (HFS) showed longer PFS and OS than patients without HFS. Two sorafenib targets, VEGFR-2 and c-kit, were not expressed in BTC samples. VEGFR-3 and Hif1α were associated with lymph node metastases and T stage. Absence of PDGFRβ expression correlated with longer PFS., Conclusion: The addition of sorafenib to gemcitabine did not demonstrate improved efficacy in advanced BTC patients. Biomarker subgroup analysis suggested that some patients might benefit from combined treatment., (Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Liver cirrhosis develops as a terminal complication of chronic liver disease. The clinical course is determined by the underlying etiology and the accompanying risk factors, which are influenced by the geographic and cultural background., Methods: A total of 236 patients (159 men, 77 women, median age 57 [22-81] years) were included for retrospective analysis between July 2012 and February 2014 using standardized questionnaires during an outpatient visit at a hepatology clinic., Results: The most common etiologies of liver cirrhosis were related to alcohol consumption (52 %), chronic hepatitis C (28 %) or hepatitis B (14 %) infection and NASH (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, 6 %). At the time of presentation 55 % patients had compensated cirrhosis corresponding to Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) stage A, while 45 % were in a decompensated stage (30 % CTP B and 15 % CTP C). Subgroups were analyzed for the incidence of complications and the emergence of infections. Most frequently esophageal varices (60 %) and ascites (49 %) were observed, followed by pleural effusion (14 %), hepatic encephalopathy (25 %) or hepatorenal syndrome (18 %). 16 % of patients exhibited infection based on clinical criteria. An infective agent was isolated in 38 % of all cases with infection and of those 50 % were gram positive bacteria. In multivariate analysis only the presence of ascites was an independent risk factor for infection., Conclusion: Despite improved medical therapies for viral hepatitis, these were the most frequent causes of liver cirrhosis, closely followed by alcoholic cirrhosis. The observed complications included bacterial infection and complication related to portal hypertension., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Upon returning from holidays, a 55-year-old patient presenting with melena and haemorrhagic shock was admitted to a University hospital after receiving first emergency medical care in a German InterCity train. In an interdisciplinary effort, haemodynamics were stabilised and the airway and respiratory function were secured. Under emergency care conditions the patient then underwent an emergency upper GI endoscopy where a spurting arterial upper gastrointestinal bleeding (Forrest 1a) was found. While the bleeding could not be controlled with endoscopic techniques, definitive haemostasis was achieved with a surgical laparotomy. While not commonly established for patients with severe GI bleeding, by spontaneous implementation of an interdisciplinary trauma room approach following established trauma algorithms the team was able to achieve stabilisation of vital functions and final control of bleeding in this highly unstable patient. Although the majority of upper gastrointestinal bleedings spontaneously cease, emergency care algorithms should be developed and implemented for patients with severe gastrointestinal bleedings in shock. Following the case vignette, we discuss a potential approach and develop an exemplary protocol for shock room management in this patient subgroup., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Unlabelled: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) has been described in the context of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. The influence of LVH on survival of liver transplant (LT) recipients has not been clarified. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of LVH on survival in LT recipients. In total, data from 352 LT patients were analyzed. LVH was diagnosed by echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular wall thickness before LT. Patients were followed up for a mean of 4.2 yr. LVH was diagnosed in 135 (38.4%) patients. Patients with LVH had significantly more frequently male gender (p = 0.046), diastolic dysfunction (p < 0.001), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; p = 0.004). Furthermore, LVH patients were older (p < 0.001) and had a higher body mass index (BMI; p = 0.001). There was no difference in frequency of arterial hypertension, pre-transplant diabetes mellitus, or etiology of liver cirrhosis. Patients without LVH had a better survival (log rank: p = 0.05) compared with LVH patients. In a multivariate Cox regression LVH (p = 0.031), end-stage renal disease (ESRD; p = 0.003) and lack of arterial hypertension (p = 0.004) but not MELD score (p = 0.885) were associated with poorer survival., Conclusion: LVH is frequently diagnosed in patients on the waiting list and influences survival after LT., (© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Therapeutic agents to inhibit tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) have dramatically improved the treatment options for patients with autoimmune diseases. Common side effects include an increased susceptibility towards infection. Hepatic side effects are less frequently observed. Elevated liver function tests, hyperbilirubinaemia reactivation of chronic viral hepatitis or even acute liver failure have been described. Some cases have exhibited an autoimmune phenotype with the emergence of autoantibodies and characteristic histological lesions. We report on three patients who received anti-TNF therapy for psoriasis and presented with elevated liver function tests in the further course. Histological and serum analysis revealed an autoimmune phenotype of liver injury. In light of the growing use of anti-TNF therapies, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) with an autoimmune phenotype is an important side effect. Since the pathophysiological mechanisms related to the autoimmune phenotype of liver injury during TNF-inhibition are not well understood, the cases detailed herein should help treating physicians to improve their understanding of the situation., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

The effect of pegylated interferon-α (IFN) add-on therapy on HBV-specific T-cell responses was evaluated in 12 patients with stable, undetectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) load under nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated at week 0, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 of IFN add-on therapy. Quantity and quality of circulating HBV S- and core-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells were analysed ex vivo by flow cytometry. HBV S- and core-specific CD4 T-cell numbers modestly increased within 8 weeks of IFN administration (P = 0.0391 and P = 0.0195), whereas HBV-specific CD8 T cells in general showed only minor changes under IFN add-on therapy. Functionality of HBV-specific CD4 but not CD8 T cells positively correlated with serum transaminase activity. In addition, we observed an increase in CD4 T cells producing tumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα) without antigen restimulation (P = 0.0039), which correlated with elevated transaminases. During IFN add-on therapy, two patients developed an anti-HBs seroconversion, only one of whom showed a relevant increase in HBV-specific T cells. In conclusion, IFN add-on therapy of chronic hepatitis B increased HBV-specific T-cell responses and affected a previously unrecognized TNFα-monofunctional CD4 T-cell population. Although the observed T-cell responses did not correlate with HBsAg seroconversion, we expect additional insights into the immunopathogenesis of hepatitis B, following the characterization of the newly identified TNF α-monofunctional T-cell population., (© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Today, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents the leading cause of death in patients with liver cirrhosis; in most western countries the incidence is also expected to increase further. Due to insufficient surveillance of patients at risk, most cases are diagnosed in an intermediate to advanced stage, leading-together with the underlying liver cirrhosis-to limited therapeutic options and a dismal prognosis. Therefore, classification according to stage and interdisciplinary treatment decisions in experienced centers are of paramount importance to provide an individualized treatment plan when considering potentially curative (resection, liver transplantation, local ablation) and palliative (transarterial approaches, sorafenib) treatment options. There is hope that the prognosis of patients with HCC can be improved in the near future by better prevention, stringent surveillance, multimodality treatment approaches, and an expansion of personalized medicine.

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare histocytic disorder. We report a case of a 45-year-old male ECD patient with severe clinical manifestation (urinary obstruction due to retroperitoneal mass with hydronephrosis, involvement of long bones) and central nervous system involvement (hemiparesis, aphasia and diabetes insipidus). Diagnosis was confirmed by typical clinical, radiological and histological findings. Under immunosuppressive therapy with prednisolone and interleukin-1A receptor antagonist (Anakinra, Kineret, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, Stockholm, Sweden), a rapid improvement of the patients' symptoms and condition was observed. This is the first report of a successful combination therapy of Anakinra and glucocorticoids. Furthermore, current literature about ECD and treatment options are discussed., (© 2014 The Authors; Internal Medicine Journal © 2014 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

The clinical picture of enlarged submandibular gland and/or enlarged lacrimal gland often leads to difficulties in differential diagnostics. From the perspective of rheumatology Sjögren's syndrome should be excluded especially in patients who complained of xerophthalmia and xerostomia for longer than 3 months. In this article the authors report the case of a patient who presented to clarify swelling of the submandibular gland and xerostomia. In close cooperation with rheumatologists, otolaryngologists and pathologists the diagnosis of IgG4-associated sialoadenitis (IgG4-associated Mikulicz's disease) could be reached.

The interdisciplinary guidelines at the S3 level on the diagnosis of and therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) constitute an evidence- and consensus-based instrument that is aimed at improving the diagnosis of and therapy for HCC since these are very challenging tasks. The purpose of the guidelines is to offer the patient (with suspected or confirmed HCC) adequate, scientifically based and up-to-date procedures in diagnosis, therapy and rehabilitation. This holds not only for locally limited or focally advanced disease but also for the existence of recurrences or distant metastases. Besides making a contribution to an appropriate health-care service, the guidelines should also provide the foundation for an individually adapted, high-quality therapy. The explanatory background texts should also enable non-specialist but responsible colleagues to give sound advice to their patients concerning specialist procedures, side effects and results. In the medium and long-term this should reduce the morbidity and mortality of patients with HCC and improve their quality of life., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

The endemic occurrence of obesity and the associated risk factors that constitute the metabolic syndrome have been predicted to lead to a dramatic increase in chronic liver disease. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has become the most frequent liver disease in countries with a high prevalence of obesity. In addition, hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance have been implicated in disease progression of other liver diseases, including chronic viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The molecular mechanisms underlying the link between insulin signaling and hepatocellular injury are only partly understood. We have explored the role of the antiapoptotic caspase-8 homolog cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (cFLIP) on liver cell survival in a diabetic model with hypoinsulinemic diabetes in order to delineate the role of insulin signaling on hepatocellular survival. cFLIP regulates cellular injury from apoptosis signaling pathways, and loss of cFLIP was previously shown to promote injury from activated TNF and CD95/Apo-1 receptors. In mice lacking cFLIP in hepatocytes (flip(-/-)), loss of insulin following streptozotocin treatment resulted in caspase- and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)-dependent liver injury after 21 days. Substitution of insulin, inhibition of JNK using the SP600125 compound in vivo or genetic deletion of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)9 (JNK2) in all tissues abolished the injurious effect. Strikingly, the difference in injury between wild-type and cFLIP-deficient mice occurred only in vivo and was accompanied by liver-infiltrating inflammatory cells with a trend toward increased amounts of NK1.1-positive cells and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. Transfer of bone marrow from rag-1-deficient mice that are depleted from B and T lymphocytes prevented liver injury in flip(-/-) mice. These findings support a direct role of insulin on cellular survival by alternating the activation of injurious MAPK, caspases and the recruitment of inflammatory cells to the liver. Thus, increasing resistance to insulin signaling pathways in hepatocytes appears to be an important factor in the initiation and progression of chronic liver disease.

Background and Study Aims: Molecular imaging has mainly been studied for detection of lesions using diagnostic probes. The aim of the current trial was to evaluate in vivo confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) with cetuximab, an antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), for detection and moreover early prediction of response to molecular chemotherapy in models of human colorectal cancer (CRC)., Methods: Xenografts with cetuximab-sensitive (HT29) and cetuximab-resistant (SW620) human CRC cell lines were induced in 44 mice. CLE was performed 48 h after injection of a fluorescently labelled cetuximab test dose, and compared with isotype antibody or untreated controls on d0, and d30 (HT29) or d15 (SW620). Initial fluorescence intensity was examined in relation to clinical readouts (tumor growth, thriving, mortality) during cetuximab treatment vs. controls. Results were validated in vivo with wide-field molecular imaging in three HT29 mice and ex vivo using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and immunohistochemistry., Results: All HT29 xenografts showed specific fluorescence in vivo after cetuximab injection on d0 and d30. Fluorescence at d0 was significantly stronger in cetuximab-treated HT29 tumors than in HT29 controls (P = 0.0017) or cetuximab-treated SW620 tumors (P = 0.0027), and accorded with significantly slower tumor progression (P = 0.0009), better overall survival (P = 0.02), and better physical condition (P < 0.0001). Cetuximab sensitivity could be predicted from fluorescence intensity at d0 with high positive predictive value., Conclusions: Molecular CLE was for the first time linked to early prediction of response to targeted therapy in models of human CRC. Therapeutic antibodies can be used as molecular beacons in CLE and wide-field techniques. These results may indicate a promising principle for early patient stratification., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

The subcellular behavior of several mineral elements was studied using modern techniques of observation like transmission electron microscopy and analysis like electron probe microanalysis and secondary ion mass spectrometry. In the present ultrastructural and analytical investigations, we undertake to compare the intracellular behavior of a heavy metal, gold, and a III-A group element, indium, on rat testicular tissues after their parenteral administrations. Our ultrastructural results showed that while gold was found only in the lysosomes of Leydig cells under electron dense needles, indium was observed as electron-dense deposits in the lysosomes of both Leydig and Sertoli cells. No ultrastructural modifications were observed in the testicular tissues of the control rats. The microanalytical study showed that gold was concentrated in lysosomes with sulfur as a sulfate crystalline structure whereas indium was concentrated in the same organelle as insoluble phosphate salt. These results demonstrated that testicular Leydig and Sertoli cells have the ability to selectively concentrate indium but gold was concentrated only in the first kind of cells. The mechanism implicated in this concentration phenomenon is a biochemical one involving intralysosomal hydrolytic enzymes, the acid phosphatase and the arylsulfatase. This mechanism occurs in order to protect the organism and to avoid the presence of toxic metals under soluble and free form.

Lethal giant larvae proteins have key roles in regulating polarity in a variety of cell types and function as tumour suppressors. A transcriptional programme initiated by aberrant Snail expression transforms epithelial cells to potentially aggressive cancer cells. Although progress in defining the molecular determinants of this programme has been made, we have little knowledge as to how the Snail-induced phenotype can be suppressed. In our studies we identified the human lethal giant larvae homologue 2, Hugl-2, (Llgl2/Lgl2) polarity gene as downregulated by Snail. Snail binds E-boxes in the Hugl-2 promoter and represses Hugl-2 expression, whereas removal of the E-boxes releases Hugl-2 from Snail repression. We demonstrate that inducing Hugl-2 in cells with constitutive Snail expression reverses the phenotype including changes in morphology, motility, tumour growth and dissemination in vivo, and expression of epithelial markers. Hugl-2 expression reduced the nuclear localization of Snail and thus binding of Snail to its target promoters. Our results placing Hugl-2 within the Snail network as well as its ability to suppress Snail carcinogenesis identifies Hugl-2 as a target molecule driving cascades, which may have preventative and therapeutic promise to minimize cancer progression.

Background: Melatonin induces apoptosis in many different cancer cell lines, including hepatocellular carcinoma cells. However, the responsible pathways have not been clearly elucidated. A member of the forkhead transcription factors' family, FoxO3a, has been implicated in the expression of the proapoptotic protein Bim (a Bcl-2-interacting mediator of cell death). In this study, we used human HepG2 liver cancer cells as an in vitro model to investigate whether melatonin treatment induces Bim through regulation by the transcription factor FoxO3a., Methods: Cytotoxicity of melatonin was compared in HepG2 hepatoblastoma cells and primary human hepatocytes. Proapoptotic Bim expression was analysed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and western blot. Reporter gene assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays were performed to analyse whether FoxO3a transactivates the Bim promoter. Small interfering RNA (siRNA) was used to study the role of FoxO3a in Bim expression. Immunofluorescence was performed to analyse FoxO3a localisation in HepG2 cells., Results: Melatonin treatment induces apoptosis in HepG2 cells, but not in primary human hepatocytes. The proapoptotic effect was mediated by increased expression of the BH3-only protein Bim. During melatonin treatment, we observed increased transcriptional activity of the forkhead-responsive element and could demonstrate that FoxO3a binds to a specific sequence within the Bim promoter. Furthermore, melatonin reduced phosphorylation of FoxO3a at Thr(32) and Ser(253), and induced its increased nuclear localisation. Moreover, silencing experiments with FoxO3a siRNA prevented Bim upregulation., Conclusion: This study shows that melatonin can induce apoptosis in HepG2 hepatocarcinoma cells through the upregulation of proapoptotic Bim mediated by nuclear translocation and activation of the transcription factor FoxO3a.