Search

The new 2024 ESC guidelines on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) introduces the AF-CARE pathway as the central acronym for AF management. As a result, the management of Comorbidities and risk factors is moving to the forefront of AF management. However, the new guideline also includes important changes in Avoidance stroke and thromboembolism, such as a modified risk score (CHA 2 DS 2 -VA) and a statement on anticoagulation in subclinical atrial fibrillation. There are also changes in the concepts of Rhythm and rate control with an upgrading of rhythm control and catheter ablation. Finally, the guideline recommends regular Evaluation and reassessment of the patient's course for optimal AF management. Here, we summarize key points of the new guidelines and discusses some recommendations on aspects that can also be assessed differently., Competing Interests: Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien Interessenkonflikt L. Eckardt: Vortragshonorare und/oder Reisekostenunterstützung von Abbott, Bayer Healthcare, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Boehringer Ingelheim, Biotronik, BMS, and Daiichi Sankyo. J. Wolfes: Vortragshonorare und/oder Reisekostenunterstützung Abbott, Bayer Healthcare, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Pfizer.Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autor/-innen keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: A frequent complication after TAVI are postinterventional conduction abnormalities requiring permanent pacemaker implantation. In this study, we analyzed the characteristics of borderline conduction abnormalities leading to pacemaker implantation and the resulting ventricular pacing amounts., Methods and Results: All patients who underwent balloon-expandable TAVI between 2014 and 2019 in our tertiary center were analyzed in a retrospective manner. One hundred and sixty-five patients of 1083 TAVI-patients developed postinterventional conduction abnormalities leading to pacemaker implantation. Of these 19 (11.5%) did not represent a clear indication for cardiac pacing according to current European guidelines. Patient characteristics, underlying conduction abnormalities, and the temporal change of ventricular pacing percentages at 24 h and 6 weeks after pacemaker implantation were analyzed. The dominating borderline conduction abnormalities leading to pacemaker implantation were new-onset persisting bundle-branch-blocks and new first-degree AV-blocks with progression of AV-delay. While pacemaker implantation was safe and without severe complications in all cases, only 6 of 19 patients had high pacing amounts (95%-100%) after 24 h while 11 patients had low to no pacing amounts (0%-5%). After 6 weeks, 8 patients showed decreasing pacing amounts, no patient had an increasing amount of ventricular pacing and all patients had an intrinsic ventricular rhythm > 30/min., Conclusion: In our cohort of 1038 TAVI patients, 19 patients underwent PMI for borderline CAs (11.5% of all PMI). Of these, only 2 patients had high pacing amounts after 6 weeks. The risk of complete persisting heart block in these patients is very low. Furthermore, algorithms to reduce ventricular pacing are highly effective to avoid ventricular pacing whenever reasonable., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Implantable loop recorder (ILR) allows rhythm-monitoring up to 3 years. They are recommended in patients with recurrent syncope and for the detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with cryptogenic thromboembolic events. AF and syncope occur more often in elderly patients. However, data in this cohort is limited., Methods and Results: All patients ≥ 80 years undergoing ILR-implantation between 2011 and 2022 in our center were included. Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) and oral anticoagulation due AF were defined as primary endpoints. Forty-five patients ≥ 80 years were included, 33 because of recurrent syncope and 12 because of suspected AF. The average follow up (FU) was 17.6 months. Overall in 22 patients, ILR-implantation led to a therapeutic consequence (48.9%). In the 12 patients who underwent ILR-implantation for detection of AF, AF was detected in nine patients (75%). In the 33 elderly patients who received ILR-implantation after syncope, 11 underwent PPI during FU (33.3%). One patient accidentally removed the ILR himself via the implantation-wound, and no other ILR-related complications were observed., Conclusion: ILR are effective and safe in elderly patients. AF was often found in patients with suspected AF, especially in patients after catheter ablation of only documented atrial flutter (AFlu). PPI-rate was high in patients with recurrent syncope and ILR-implantation. Further investigations are necessary to determine whether PPI may be considered in elderly patients with syncope even in the absence of a bifascicular block., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Torsades de pointes (TdP) represent a complex polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. While the triggering mechanisms of early afterdepolarization and increased dispersion of repolarization are well investigated, the sudden self-limiting termination remains poorly understood., Objective: The purpose of this study was to perform analysis of TdP to investigate factors causing spontaneous termination., Methods: We used a large data set from Langendorff experiments in isolated rabbit hearts in which drug-induced QT prolongation, bradycardia, and hypokalemia provoke TdP. We included 427 episodes with typical TdP characteristics of polymorphic self-terminating beats and twisting QRS complexes occurring in the presence of abnormal QT prolongation due to various different QT-prolonging drugs. The use of 8 monophasic action potential catheters allowed the characterization of action potential duration, configuration, and dispersion of repolarization beyond the capabilities of the surface electrocardiogram. To identify possible mechanisms of arrhythmia termination, the initial, midpoint, and terminal 3 ventricular complexes were analyzed for each episode., Results: An abrupt decrease in spatial dispersion over the course of a TdP episode was identified as a precursor for termination of TdP. Within the last 3 beats, a sudden significant decrease in the dispersion of repolarization was observed as a predictor of termination. In parallel, there was a decrease in action potential duration (action potential duration at 90% repolarization) before termination. Also, a change in action potential configuration (action potential duration at 90% repolarization/action potential duration at 50% repolarization ratio) in terms of the loss of action potential dome with a restitution of action potential triangulation was observed., Conclusion: In >400 TdP episodes, homogenization of myocardial repolarization with the recovery of an action potential configuration determines the termination of TdP episodes., Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: COVID-19 has been associated with cardiovascular complications including ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and an increased number of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Nevertheless, several authors described a decrease of VA burden in patients with an implantable defibrillator (ICD) during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of this study was to determine if these observations could be transferred to later periods of the pandemic as well., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 1674 patients with an ICD presenting in our outpatient clinic during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and during a control period for the occurrence of VA requiring ICD interventions., Results: Seven hundred ninety-five patients with an ICD had a device interrogation in our ambulatory clinic during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to eight hundred seventy-nine patients in the control period. There was significant higher amount of adequate ICD therapies in the course of the COVID-19 period. Thirty-six patients (4.5%) received in total eighty-five appropriate ICD interventions during COVID-19, whereas only sixteen patients (1.8%) had sustained VA in the control period (p = 0.01)., Conclusion: In contrast to the first wave of COVID-19, which was characterized by a decrease or least stable number of ICD therapies in several centers, we found a significant increase of VA in ICD patients during the second wave of COVID-19. Possible explanations for this observation include higher infectious rates, potential cardiac side effects of the vaccination as well as personal behavioral changes, or reduced utilization of medical services., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing hemodialysis and in this patient population, management in terms of oral anticoagulation (OAC) presents unique challenges due to the increased risk of both thromboembolic events and bleeding complications. The attributable risk of AF for stroke may differ from patients without CKD, raising the question if OAC is indicated at all. Historically, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been the standard treatment for anticoagulation in AF; however, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as an alternative therapeutic option, whereby data from prospective randomised trials with hemodialysis patients is limited resulting in great variability of practice and guideline recommendations. This review summarizes existing data sources regarding the use and benefit of oral anticoagulation with VKA and DOAC in hemodialysis patients., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Molecular ultrasound imaging with actively targeted microbubbles (MB) proved promising in preclinical studies but its clinical translation is limited. To achieve this, it is essential that the actively targeted MB can be produced with high batch-to-batch reproducibility with a controllable and defined number of binding ligands on the surface. In this regard, poly (n-butyl cyanoacrylate) (PBCA)-based polymeric MB have been used for US molecular imaging, however, ligand coupling was mostly done via hydrolysis and carbodiimide chemistry, which is a multi-step procedure with poor reproducibility and low MB yield. Herein, we developed a single-step coupling procedure resulting in high MB yields with minimal batch-to-batch variation. Actively targeted PBCA-MB were generated using an aminolysis protocol, wherein amine-containing cRGD was added to the MB using lithium methoxide as a catalyst. We confirmed the successful conjugation of cRGD on the MB surface, while preserving their structure and acoustic signal. Compared to the conventional hydrolysis protocol, aminolysis resulted in higher MB yields and better reproducibility of coupling efficiency. Optical imaging revealed that under flow conditions, cRGD- and rhodamine-labelled MB, generated by aminolysis, specifically bind to tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) activated endothelial cells in vitro. Furthermore, US molecular imaging demonstrated a markedly higher binding of the cRGD-MB than of control MB in TNF-α activated mouse aortas and 4T1 tumors in mice. Thus, using the aminolysis based conjugation approach, important refinements on the production of cRGD-MB could be achieved that will facilitate the production of clinical-scale formulations with excellent binding and ultrasound imaging performance., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Extracorporeal life support systems (ECLS) are life-sustaining measures for severe cardiovascular diseases, serving as bridging treatment either until cardiovascular function is restored or alternative treatment, such as heart transplantation or the implantation of permanent ventricular assist devices is performed. Given the insufficient evidence and frequent urgency of implantation without initial patient consent, the ethical challenges and psychological burden for patients, relatives and the interprofessional intensive care team are significant. As with any treatment, an appropriate therapeutic goal for ECLS treatment based on the indications and patient informed consent is mandatory. In order to integrate the necessary ethical considerations into everyday clinical practice, a structured algorithm for handling ECLS is proposed here, which takes ethical aspects into due account., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Objective and Background:  Data on incidence of in-hospital pulmonary embolisms (PE) after catheter ablation (CA) are scarce. To gain further insights, we sought to provide new findings through case-based analyses of administrative data., Methods:  Incidences of PE after CA of supraventricular tachycardias (SVT), atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFlu), and ventricular tachycardias (VT) in three German tertiary centers between 2005 and 2020 were determined and coded by the G-DRG (German Diagnosis Related Groups System) and OPS (German Operation and Procedure Classification) systems. An administrative search was performed with a consecutive case-based analysis., Results:  Overall, 47,344 ablations were analyzed (10,037 SVT; 28,048 AF; 6,252 AFlu; 3,007 VT). PE occurred in 14 (0.03%) predominantly female ( n  = 9; 64.3%) patients with a mean age of 55.3 ± 16.9 years, body mass index 26.2 ± 5.1 kg/m 2 , and left ventricular ejection fraction of 56 ± 13.6%. PE incidences were 0.05% ( n  = 5) for SVT, 0.02% ( n  = 5) for AF, and 0.13% ( n  = 4) for VT ablations. No patient suffered PE after AFlu ablation. Five patients (35.7%) with PE after CA had no prior indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC). Preprocedural international normalized ratio in PE patients was 1.2 ± 0.5. Most patients with PE following CA presented with symptoms the day after the procedure ( n  = 9) after intraprocedural heparin application of 12,943.2 ± 5,415.5 IU. PE treatment included anticoagulation with either phenprocoumon ( n  = 5) or non-vitamin K-dependent OAC ( n  = 9). Two patients with PE died after VT/AF ablation, respectively. The remaining patients were discharged without sequels., Conclusion:  Over a 15-year period, incidence of PE after ablation is low, particularly low in patients with ablation for AF/AFlu. This is most likely due to stricter anticoagulation management in these patients compared with those receiving SVT/VT ablation procedures and could argue for continuation of OAC prior to ablation. Optimizing periprocedural anticoagulation management should be subject of further prospective trials., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), recurrent AF and sinus rhythm during follow-up are determined by interactions between cardiovascular disease processes and rhythm-control therapy. Predictors of attaining sinus rhythm at follow-up are not well known., Methods: To quantify the interaction between cardiovascular disease processes and rhythm outcomes, 14 biomarkers reflecting AF-related cardiovascular disease processes in 1586 patients in the EAST-AFNET 4 biomolecule study (71 years old, 46% women) were quantified at baseline. Mixed logistic regression models including clinical features were constructed for each biomarker. Biomarkers were interrogated for interaction with early rhythm control. Outcome was sinus rhythm at 12 months. Results were validated at 24 months and in external datasets., Results: Higher baseline concentrations of three biomarkers were independently associated with a lower chance of sinus rhythm at 12 months: angiopoietin 2 (ANGPT2) (odds ratio [OR] 0.76 [95% confidence interval 0.65-0.89], p=0.001), bone morphogenetic protein 10 (BMP10) (OR 0.83 [0.71-0.97], p=0.017) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (OR 0.73 [0.60-0.88], p=0.001). Analysis of rhythm at 24 months confirmed the results. Early rhythm control interacted with the predictive potential of NT-proBNP (pinteraction=0.033). The predictive effect of NT-proBNP was reduced in patients randomized to early rhythm control (usual care: OR 0.64 [0.51-0.80], p<0.001; early rhythm control: OR 0.90 [0.69-1.18], p=0.453). External validation confirmed that low concentrations of ANGPT2, BMP10 and NT-proBNP predict sinus rhythm during follow-up., Conclusions: Low concentrations of ANGPT2, BMP10 and NT-proBNP identify patients with AF who are likely to attain sinus rhythm during follow-up. The predictive ability of NT-proBNP is attenuated in patients receiving rhythm control., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Age is a relevant risk factor for the development of atrial fibrillation (AF) and is associated with increased recurrence rates in the setting of rhythm control. Catheter ablation is increasingly advocated in elderly despite conflicting data regarding its efficacy and safety in this patient cohort. Therefore, we aimed to analyse currently available evidence regarding catheter ablation for AF in patients ≥ 75 years old compared with younger patients., Methods: We performed a systematic literature search and meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in patients ≥ 75 years old with AF. Primary efficacy and safety end points were first recurrence of atrial arrhythmia after first-time ablation and occurrence of death, stroke, or any procedure-related complication. Secondary outcomes included procedure and fluoroscopy time., Results: We identified 301 potentially relevant studies, of which 39 underwent detailed analysis. A total of 19 studies (MINORS score ≥ 13) reporting on 108,419 patients (101,844 < 75 years, 6,575 ≥ 75 years of age) undergoing first-time catheter ablation for AF were included. Risk of arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation (39% vs 32%, relative risk [RR] 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.41; P = 0.001) and occurrence of safety end points (10.8% vs 8.5%; RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.53-1.76; P < 0.00001) were significantly higher in patients ≥ 75 years of age than in younger patients. There was no difference concerning procedure (P = 0.33) or fluoroscopy time (P = 0.91) between younger and elderly patients., Conclusions: In patients ≥ 75 years of age, catheter ablation for AF has higher risk of arrhythmia recurrence and is associated with an increased risk of procedure-related complications and safety end point occurrence compared with younger patients., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is limited information on the mode of arrhythmia initiation in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF). A non-pause-dependent mechanism has been suggested to be the rule., Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the mode and characteristics of initiation of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PVT) in patients with short or long-coupled PVT/IVF included in THESIS (THerapy Efficacy in Short or long-coupled idiopathic ventricular fibrillation: an International Survey), a multicenter study involving 287 IVF patients treated with drugs or radiofrequency ablation., Methods: We reviewed the initiation of 410 episodes of ≥1 PVT triplet in 180 patients (58.3% females; age 39.6 ± 13.6 years) with IVF. The incidence of pause-dependency arrhythmia initiation (prolongation by >20 ms of the preceding cycle length) was assessed., Results: Most arrhythmias (n = 295; 72%) occurred during baseline supraventricular rhythm without ambient premature ventricular complexes (PVCs), whereas 106 (25.9%) occurred during baseline rhythm including PVCs. Nine (2.2%) arrhythmias occurred during atrial/ventricular pacing and were excluded from further analysis. Mode of PVT initiation was pause-dependent in 45 (15.6%) and 64 (60.4%) of instances in the first and second settings, respectively, for a total of 109 of 401 (27.2%). More than one type of pause-dependent and/or non-pause-dependent initiation (mean: 2.6) occurred in 94.4% of patients with ≥4 events. Coupling intervals of initiating PVCs were <350 ms, 350-500 ms, and >500 ms in 76.6%, 20.72%, and 2.7% of arrhythmia initiations, respectively., Conclusions: Pause-dependent initiation occurred in more than a quarter of arrhythmic episodes in IVF patients. PVCs having long (between 350 and 500 ms) and very long (>500 ms) coupling intervals were observed at the initiation of nearly a quarter of PVT episodes., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Age is a major risk-factor for atrial fibrillation (AF) and associated hospitalisations. With increasing emphasis on rhythm control, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is often suggested, even to elderly patients (≥ 75 years of age). Efficacy of PVI aiming at rhythm control is limited in persistent AF. Pacemaker implantation with atrioventricular node (AVN) ablation may represent a reasonable alternative, with the aim of controlling symptoms and improving quality of life in elderly patients. In this investigator-initiated, randomised, multicentre trial, we test the hypothesis that pacemaker implantation and AVN ablation provides superior symptom control over PVI in elderly patients with symptomatic persistent AF, without any increase in adverse event profile. In the ABLATE Versus PACE (NCT04906668) prospective open-label superiority trial, 196 elderly patients with normal ejection fraction and symptomatic persistent AF despite guideline-indicated medical therapy will be randomised to either cryoballoon PVI (ABLATE) or dual-chamber pacemaker implantation with subsequent AVN ablation (PACE), and followed for a minimum of 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome is a composite end point of rehospitalisation for atrial arrhythmia or cardiac decompensation/heart failure, (outpatient) electrical cardioversion, or upgrade to cardiac resynchronisation therapy owing to worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction to ≤ 35%. Secondary end points include death from any cause, stroke, quality of life, and procedure-related complications. Sample size is designed to achieve 80% power for the primary end point (2-tailed alpha of 5%). ABLATE Versus PACE will determine whether pacemaker implantation and AVN ablation can improve symptom-control in elderly patients with persistent AF over PVI without increasing safety end points., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To assess the risk of unsuccessful conversion of ventricular fibrillation during defibrillation testing (DFT) with the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD), the PRAETORIAN score has been proposed., Objective: The purpose of this study was to validate the PRAETORIAN score in a large S-ICD collective., Methods: A retrospective single-center analysis of S-ICD patients receiving intraoperative DFT was performed. DFT was performed using a stepwise protocol with 65-J standard polarity, change of polarity, increase to 80 J, and repositioning if necessary. If all DFTs failed, we switched to a transvenous ICD., Results: Overall, 398 patients were analyzed (268 male [67.3%]; mean age 42.4 ± 15.9 years; mean body mass index [BMI] 25.9 ± 4.8 kg/m 2 ). Successful DFT with the first ICD shock was observed in 264 patients (66.3%). One hundred fourteen patients were defibrillated with the second (n = 104) or third (n = 10) DFT after changing shock polarity and/or shock energy. Overall, 20 patients needed at least 3 DFT (ie, 80 J and/or re-positioning). The majority (n = 88 [65.7%]) of DFT failures occurred before 2015 with the first-generation S-ICD. PRAETORIAN score was an independent predictor of DFT failure (odds ratio [OR] 1.007; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.003-1.011 P ≤.001), while whereas BMI alone was not (P = .31). Presence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.3-4.4; P = .004) was predictive for at least 1 unsuccessful DFT in our multivariate regression analysis., Conclusion: PRAETORIAN score proved to be a useful and valid predictive tool for successful DFT, whereas BMI only had a limited role. Patients with HCM were at increased risk for DFT failure or needed higher DFT energy., Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have no conflicts to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Antiviral therapies for treatment of COVID-19 may be associated with significant proarrhythmic potential. In the present study, the potential cardiotoxic side effects of these therapies were evaluated using a Langendorff model of the isolated rabbit heart. 51 hearts of female rabbits were retrogradely perfused, employing a Langendorff-setup. Eight catheters were placed endo- and epicardially to perform an electrophysiology study, thus obtaining cycle length-dependent action potential duration at 90% of repolarization (APD 90 ), QT intervals and dispersion of repolarization. After generating baseline data, the hearts were assigned to four groups: In group 1 (HXC), hearts were treated with 1 µM hydroxychloroquine. Thereafter, 3 µM hydroxychloroquine were infused additionally. Group 2 (HXC + AZI) was perfused with 3 µM hydroxychloroquine followed by 150 µM azithromycin. In group 3 (LOP) the hearts were perfused with 3 µM lopinavir followed by 5 µM and 10 µM lopinavir. Group 4 (REM) was perfused with 1 µM remdesivir followed by 5 µM and 10 µM remdesivir. Hydroxychloroquine- and azithromycin-based therapies have a significant proarrhythmic potential mediated by action potential prolongation and an increase in dispersion. Lopinavir and remdesivir showed overall significantly less pronounced changes in electrophysiology. In accordance with the reported bradycardic events under remdesivir, it significantly reduced the rate of the ventricular escape rhythm., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In contrast to current guidelines and earlier trials, recent studies demonstrated superiority of rhythm- over rate-control and challenged the strategy of "rate versus rhythm" therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. These newer studies have started to shift the use of rhythm-control therapy from the symptom-driven therapy of current guidelines to a risk-reducing strategy aimed at restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm. This review discusses recent data and presents an overview on the current discourse: The concept of early rhythm control seems attractive. Patients with rhythm control may undergo less atrial remodeling compared to those with rate control. In addition, in EAST-AFNET 4 an outcome-reducing effect of rhythm control was achieved by delivering therapy with relatively few complications early after the initial AF diagnosis. Successful rhythm control therapy and most likely reduced AF burden, estimated by the presence of sinus rhythm at 12 months after randomization, explained most of the reduction in cardiovascular outcomes achieved by rhythm control. However, it is too early to call for early rhythm control for all AF patients. Rhythm control may raise concerns regarding the generalizability of trial results in routine practice involving important questions on the definition of "early" and "successful", and the relevant issue of antiarrhythmic drugs versus catheter ablation. Further information is required to select patients who will benefit from an early ablative or non-ablative rhythm management., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background : The number of young patients receiving ICDs or CRT-Ds has been increasing in recent decades and understanding the key characteristics of this special population is paramount to optimized patient care. Methods : The DEVICE I+II registry prospectively enrolled patients undergoing ICD/CRT-D implantation or revision from 50 German centers between 2007 and 2014 Data on patient characteristics, procedural outcome, adverse events, and mortality during the initial stay and 1-year follow-up were collected. All patients under the age of 45 years were identified and included in a comparative analysis with the remaining population. Results : A total number of 5313 patients were enrolled into the registry, of which 339 patients (6.4%) were under the age of 45 years. Mean age was 35.0 ± 8.2 vs. 67.5 ± 9.7 years, compared to older patients (≥45 years). Young patients were more likely to receive an ICD (90.9 vs. 69.9%, p < 0.001) than a CRT-D device (9.1 vs. 30.1%). Coronary artery disease was less common in younger patients (13.6 vs. 63.9%, p < 0.001), whereas hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (10.9 vs. 2.7%, p < 0.001) and primary cardiac electrical diseases (11.2 vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001) were encountered more often. Secondary preventive ICD was more common in younger patients (51.6 vs. 39.9%, p < 0.001). Among those patients, survival of sudden cardiac death (66.7 vs. 45.4%, p < 0.001) due to ventricular fibrillation (60.6 vs. 37.9%, p < 0.001) was the leading cause for admission. There were no detectable differences in postoperative complications requiring intervention (1.5 vs. 1.9%, p = 0.68) or in-hospital mortality (0.0 vs. 0.3%, p = 0.62). Median follow-up duration was 17.9 [13.4-22.9] vs. 16.9 [13.1-23.1] months ( p = 0.13). In younger patients, device-associated complications requiring revision were more common (14.1 vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001) and all-cause 1-year-mortality after implantation was lower (2.9 vs. 7.3%, p = 0.003; HR 0.39, 95%CI: 0.2-0.75) than in older patients. Conclusions : Young patients < 45 years of age received defibrillator therapy more often for secondary prevention. Rates for periprocedural complications and in-hospital mortality were very low and without differences between groups. Young patients have lower mortality during follow-up but experienced a higher rate of postoperative complications requiring revision, potentially due to a more active lifestyle.

Aims: Clinical concerns exist about the potential proarrhythmic effects of the sodium channel blockers (SCBs) flecainide and propafenone in patients with cardiovascular disease. Sodium channel blockers were used to deliver early rhythm control (ERC) therapy in EAST-AFNET 4., Methods and Results: We analysed the primary safety outcome (death, stroke, or serious adverse events related to rhythm control therapy) and primary efficacy outcome (cardiovascular death, stroke, and hospitalization for worsening of heart failure (HF) or acute coronary syndrome) during SCB intake for patients with ERC (n = 1395) in EAST-AFNET 4. The protocol discouraged flecainide and propafenone in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and suggested stopping therapy upon QRS prolongation >25% on therapy. Flecainide or propafenone was given to 689 patients [age 69 (8) years; CHA2DS2-VASc 3.2 (1); 177 with HF; 41 with prior myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, or percutaneous coronary intervention; 26 with left ventricular hypertrophy >15 mm; median therapy duration 1153 [237, 1828] days]. The primary efficacy outcome occurred less often in patients treated with SCB [3/100 (99/3316) patient-years] than in patients who never received SCB [SCBnever 4.9/100 (150/3083) patient-years, P < 0.001]. There were numerically fewer primary safety outcomes in patients receiving SCB [2.9/100 (96/3359) patient-years] than in SCBnever patients [4.2/100 (135/3220) patient-years, adjusted P = 0.015]. Sinus rhythm at 2 years was similar between groups [SCB 537/610 (88); SCBnever 472/579 (82)]., Conclusion: Long-term therapy with flecainide or propafenone appeared to be safe in the EAST-AFNET 4 trial to deliver effective ERC therapy, including in selected patients with stable cardiovascular disease such as coronary artery disease and stable HF. Clinical Trial Registration ISRCTN04708680, NCT01288352, EudraCT2010-021258-20, www.easttrial.org., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: A.R.: Consultant fees, travel grants or lecture fees from Medtronic, Biosense Webster, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Ablamap, Philips, Cardiofocus, Bayer, Pfizer and Novartis, Edwards and Lifetech. Committee: German Society of Cardiology (Select-chair of EP community). L.E.: Grants/contracts: research support by the German heart foundation. Consulting fees Boston Scientific, lecture fees for various medical companies. Society, committee: German Society of Cardiology; European Society of Cardiology; European Heart Rhythm Society. K.B.: no COIs. J.C.: Participation on a data safety monitoring board: Anthos, Johnson and Johnson, Enso, Bayer, Charité. H.C.: Grants/contracts: ZonMw grant no. 104021005 RACE 9 Device-based rate vs. rhythm control treatment in patients with symptomatic recent-onset atrial fibrillation in the emergency department (RACE 9). Consulting fees: InCarda Therapeutics, Roche, Sanofi, Atricure. Payment or Honoraria: Medtronic. Participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board: Chair DSMB Decision trial. Committee/society: DZHK, German Centre for Cardiovascular research. A.G.: Grants/contracts: Maestria Grant EU 965286. Consulting fees: Sanofi-Aventis, Bayer, Astra Zeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, BMS/Pfizer, Viofor, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Menarini. G.B.: Chair, advisory board to AFNET e.V., no payment. M.L.: No COIs. A.M.: Consulting fees: Medtronic, Johnson and Johnson, Boston Scientific, LifeTech. Lecture honoraria: Medtronic, Johnson and Johnson, Lifetech, Pfizer, Boston Scientific, Bayer, Bristol Meyer Squibb. L.R.: No COIs. U.S.: Grants/contracts: EU: CATCH ME, MAESTRIA, Personalize AF, REPAIR, Dutch Heart foundation, RACE V Embrace. Consulting fees: Roche advisory board, YourRhythmics BV. Payment or honoraria: Johnson and Johnson. Patents: non-invasive classification of AF with ECG. Society/Committee: Board of directors of AFNET. Stock or stock options: YourRhythmics BV. E.V.: Support for present manuscript: AFNET: payments made to my institution. Outside this work: Biotronik: payments made to my institution. K.W.: All support payment for manuscript: AFNET. Grants/contracts: Biotronik, Resmed. Payment/honoraria: Boston scientific, Novartis. A.Z.: Support for present manuscript: AFNET: payments made to my institution. Outside this work: Biotronik: payments made to my institution. Grants/contracts: Biotronik, Resmed. Payment/honoraria: Boston scientific. H.H.: Unconditional Research Grants through the University of Hassels and Antwerp: Abbott, Medtronic, Biotronik, Boston scientific, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer–BMS. Payment or honoraria: Bayer, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Milestone Pharmaceuticals, Centrix India, CTI Germany, European Society of Cardiology, Medscape, Springer healthcare. Participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board: Member, DSBM Prestige-AF. S.W.: Grants: Boston Scientific, Consulting fees: Boston Scientific, Abbott. Speakers Bureau: BSCI; Abbott, BMS, Medtronic. L.F.: Institutional government or charity research support: European Union Horizon 2020 MAESTRIA [grant agreement number 965286 (MAESTRIA)] European Union Horizon 2020 CATCH ME, [grant agreement number 633196 (CATCH ME), European Union Horizon 2020 AFFECT-EU, grant agreement number 847770 (AFFECT-EU)] Institutional governmental support, National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR, Medical Research Council (UK), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research DZHK. Support for attending meetings: ESC, EHRA, and ESC working groups, ARVC patient organization (charity). Patents planned issued or pending: L.F. is listed as inventor of two patents (Atrial Fibrillation Therapy WO 2015140571, Markers for Atrial Fibrillation WO 2016012783). Society/committee: BHF project grant committee (charity). BHF chair committee visits (charity), AFNET steering committee (charity), ARVC patient organization (charity). Equipment and analytics to AFNET for AFNET 9: Preventicus, Trial costs to AFNET for AFNET 9: Daiichi Sankyo. R.S. has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the grant agreement No 648131, from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the grant agreement no. 847770 (AFFECT-EU) and German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK e.V.) (81Z1710103 and 81Z0710114); German Ministry of Research and Education (BMBF 01ZX1408A) and ERACoSysMed3 (031L0239). Wolfgang Seefried project funding German Heart Foundation. Lecture fees and advisory board fees from BMS/Pfizer and Bayer. Society/committee: ESC stroke council nucleus member. C.M.: Grants or contracts: Research funding from German Center for Cardiovascular Research (Promotion of women scientists programme; FKZ 81X3710112); Deutsche Stiftung für Herzforschung; Dr. Rolf M. Schwiete Stiftung; NDD; Loewenstein Medical. Payment or honoraria: AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly, Bayer, Pfizer, Sanofi, Aventis, Apontis, Abbott. Support for attending meetings: AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly, Novo Nordisk. Participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board: Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly; Novo Nordisk. P.K.: P.K. was partially supported by European Union AFFECT-AF (grant agreement 847770), and MAESTRIA (grant agreement 965286), British Heart Foundation (PG/17/30/32961; PG/20/22/35093; AA/18/2/34218), German Center for Cardiovascular Research supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (DZHK, grant numbers DZHK FKZ 81X2800182, 81Z0710116, and 81Z0710110), German Research Foundation (Ki 509167694), and Leducq Foundation. P.K. receives research support for basic, translational, and clinical research projects from European Union, British Heart Foundation, Leducq Foundation, Medical Research Council (UK), and German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, from several drug and device companies active in atrial fibrillation. P.K. is listed as inventor on two issued patents held by University of Hamburg (Atrial Fibrillation Therapy WO 2015140571, Markers for Atrial Fibrillation WO 2016012783). P.K. receives research support for basic, translational, and clinical research projects from European Union, British Heart Foundation, Leducq Foundation, Medical Research Council (UK), and German Center for Cardiovascular Research, from several drug and device companies active in atrial fibrillation, and has received honoraria from several such companies in the past, but not in the last 3 years. P.K. is board member of the ESC and speaker of the board AFNET., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Abstract: A 72-year-old man revealed typical findings of cardiac sarcoidosis on cardiovascular MRI. However, 18 F-FDG PET showed no hypermetabolism. Therefore, immunosuppression was not initiated. After 2 years, ventricular arrhythmias and heart failure worsened. 68 Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor PET was initiated to evaluate potential adverse remodeling due to progressive myocardial fibrosis. A second 18 F-FDG PET still revealed no hypermetabolism, and the patient received an implanted cardioverter defibrillator after electrophysiological risk stratification. We present a case of intense fibroblast activation despite a missing 18 F-FDG uptake (mismatch)., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Despite impressive developments in the field of ventricular arrhythmias, there is still a relevant number of patients with ventricular arrhythmias who require antiarrhythmic drug therapy and may, e.g., in otherwise drug and/or ablation refractory situations, benefit from agents known for decades, such as mexiletine. Through its capability of blocking fast sodium channels in cardiomyocytes, it has played a minor to moderate antiarrhythmic role throughout the recent decades. Nevertheless, certain patients with structural heart disease suffering from drug-refractory, i.e., mainly amiodarone refractory ventricular arrhythmias, as well as those with selected forms of congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) may nowadays still benefit from mexiletine. Here, we outline mexiletine's cellular and clinical electrophysiological properties. In addition, the application of mexiletine may be accompanied by various potential side effects, e.g., nausea and tremor, and is limited by several drug-drug interactions. Thus, we shed light on the current therapeutic role of mexiletine for therapy of ventricular arrhythmias and discuss clinically relevant aspects of its indications based on current evidence., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Due to suspected pro-arrhythmic effects and increased mortality associated with class-IC antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in previous trials, AAD therapy in structural heart disease (SHD) is mainly restricted to amiodarone. In the presence of diagnostic and therapeutic advancements in cardiovascular medicine, it remains unclear if previous studies adequately reflect contemporary patients. In clinical practice, class-IC-AADs are occasionally used in individual cases, particularly in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)., Methods: This study retrospectively investigated outcome in ICD-carriers with SHD in whom class-IC-AADs were used as an individualized therapy due to failure, side effects, or unacceptable risk of alternative therapeutic options., Results: Fifty patients from four tertiary centers were included (median age 48.5 years; 52% female). The most common underlying SHD were dilated (42%) or ischemic cardiomyopathy (26%) (median LVEF = 45%). Indications for AAD were sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA) (58%), symptomatic premature ventricular contractions (26%), or atrial arrhythmias (16%). Median follow-up was 27.8 months. Freedom from sustained VA was 72%, and freedom from ICD therapy was 80%. In 19 patients (38%), AAD therapy was terminated. The most common reason was insufficient efficacy (n = 8). Pro-arrhythmia was suspected in three patients. Five patients died during follow-up (10.0%), two of cardiovascular cause (4.0%)., Conclusion: In a multicenter cohort of ICD-carriers with SHD, class-IC-AADs were associated with a low rate of pro-arrhythmic effects or cardiovascular mortality. The majority of patients remained free from sustained VA during a follow-up of > 2 years. Further efforts should be made to evaluate the safety of class-IC-AADs in SHD patients receiving contemporary cardiovascular therapy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: The current study aimed to determine the effects of low (i.e., balance task only) versus high (i.e., balance task combined with an additional motor task like dribbling a basketball) balance training complexity (6 weeks of training consisting of 2 × 30 min balance exercises per week) on measures of static and dynamic balance in 44 healthy male adolescents (mean age: 13.3 ± 1.6 years)., Results: Irrespective of balance training complexity, significant medium- to large-sized pretest to posttest improvements were detected for static (i.e., One-Legged Stance test, stance time [s], 0.001 < p ≤ 0.008) and dynamic (i.e., 3-m Beam Walking Backward test, steps [n], 0.001 < p ≤ 0.002; Y-Balance-Test-Lower-Quarter, reach distance [cm], 0.001 < p ≤ 0.003) balance performance. Further, in all but one comparison (i.e., stance time with eyes opened on foam ground) no group × test interactions were found. These results imply that balance training is effective to improve static and dynamic measures of balance in healthy male adolescents, but the effectiveness seems unaffected by the applied level of balance training complexity., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter is routinely performed in patients with implantable devices. The aim of the present study was to assess success rates and potential complications in a large registry cohort of patients with cardiac pacemakers., Methods and Results: The German Ablation Registry is a nationwide, prospective registry with a 1-year follow-up investigating patients who underwent catheter ablation of supraventricular arrhythmias in 51 German centers. The present analysis focussed on the presence of cardiac pacemakers in 591 patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. These were compared to 7393 patients without a pacemaker. Patients with pacemakers were significantly older and presented more comorbidities like diabetes, renal failure, cardiovascular disease, or previous stroke. One-year mortality (2.4% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.022) and a combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (3.6% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.014) were significantly elevated in patients with pacemakers. Re-hospitalization was also more common in patients with a pacemaker (53.3% vs. 45.0%, p < 0.01). After adjustment for important comorbidities, pre-existing pacemaker systems did not show any negative effect. Procedural success was reported in 98.8% vs. 98.4% (p = 0.93). Device-related complications were only observed in 0.4% of patients with pacemakers., Conclusion: Patients with pacemaker systems undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter demonstrate an increased risk of death, cardiovascular events, and re-hospitalization. This observation can be largely attributed to an older patient population and an increased rate of comorbidities., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Availability of devices capable of continuous rhythm monitoring such as smartwatches, implantable loop recorders, or pacemakers/defibrillators is continuously increasing. Importantly, device detected "subclinical" atrial fibrillation seems to convey a significantly lower risk of thromboembolism than "clinical" atrial fibrillation verified by a conventional ECG recording. While current guidelines indicate a possible role of oral anticoagulation in selected high-risk patients with subclinical AF, recent trials show an ambiguous risk/benefit relationship of anticoagulation in this setting. The present review therefore summarizes current data on the role of oral anticoagulation in subclinical AF, aims at aiding in the decision process of anticoagulation, and illustrates current gaps in evidence regarding subclinical AF., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Recent trial data demonstrate beneficial effects of active rhythm management in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and support the concept that a low arrhythmia burden is associated with a low risk of AF-related complications. The aim of this document is to summarize the key outcomes of the 9th AFNET/EHRA Consensus Conference of the Atrial Fibrillation NETwork (AFNET) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)., Methods and Results: Eighty-three international experts met in Münster for 2 days in September 2023. Key findings are as follows: (i) Active rhythm management should be part of the default initial treatment for all suitable patients with AF. (ii) Patients with device-detected AF have a low burden of AF and a low risk of stroke. Anticoagulation prevents some strokes and also increases major but non-lethal bleeding. (iii) More research is needed to improve stroke risk prediction in patients with AF, especially in those with a low AF burden. Biomolecules, genetics, and imaging can support this. (iv) The presence of AF should trigger systematic workup and comprehensive treatment of concomitant cardiovascular conditions. (v) Machine learning algorithms have been used to improve detection or likely development of AF. Cooperation between clinicians and data scientists is needed to leverage the potential of data science applications for patients with AF., Conclusions: Patients with AF and a low arrhythmia burden have a lower risk of stroke and other cardiovascular events than those with a high arrhythmia burden. Combining active rhythm control, anticoagulation, rate control, and therapy of concomitant cardiovascular conditions can improve the lives of patients with AF., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The 9th AFNET/EHRA consensus conference was partially supported by the European Union MAESTRIA project (grant agreement 965286) to AFNET. The following participants and authors are employees of companies active in cardiovascular health as indicated in their affiliations: M.D.M., E.D., C.E., G.H., L.H.H., T.H., R.H.v.L., M.W., and H.W. P.K. was partially supported by the European Union AFFECT-AF (grant agreement 847770) and MAESTRIA (grant agreement 965286), German Center for Cardiovascular Research supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (DZHK, grant numbers DZHK FKZ 81X2800182, 81Z0710116, and 81Z0710110), German Research Foundation (Ki 509167694), and Leducq Foundation. He receives research support for basic, translational, and clinical research projects from several drug and device companies active in AF and has received honoraria from several such companies in the past, but not in the last 3 years. He is listed as an inventor on two issued patents held by the University of Hamburg (Atrial Fibrillation Therapy WO 2015140571, Markers for Atrial Fibrillation WO 2016012783). J.G.A. was partially supported by the Canadian Arrhythmia Network and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research, Baylis Medical. He receives consulting fees/honoraria from Bayer, BMS/Pfizer Alliance, Servier, and Medtronic Inc. E.A. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Biosense Webster and Bayer. G.B. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Bayer, BMS, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, and Janssen. A.J.C. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Bayer, Pfizer/BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Menarini, Sanofi, Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, Abbott, Acesion Pharma, Huya Bio, and Milestone. V.C. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Ever Pharma (paid to the institution of employment). W.D. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Reata and research grants from MicroPort, Boston Scientific, and Abbott. S.Z.D. receives consulting fees from BMS/Pfizer, Cortrium, and Acesion Pharma and speaker fees from MS/Pfizer and Bayer. He is listed as a medical advisor for Vital Beats. Dobromir D. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Elsevier, Springer Healthcare Ltd, and Daiichi Sankyo and research grants as follows: four NIH grants (partially) from Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; one NIH grant from UC Davis, one NIH grant from the University of Minnesota, and one EU-Project H2020. David D. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, BMS/Pfizer, CVRx, Medtronic, MicroPort, and Zoll and research grants from Roche, CVRx, and Zoll. L.E. has received lecture fees from various companies in AF in the past but none related to the present work. L.F. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Roche (paid to the institution of employment). She is currently employed at the UKE and previously at the University of Birmingham. She was partially supported by the European Union AFFECT-EU (grant agreement 847770), MAESTRIA (grant agreement 965286), CATCH ME (grant agreement 633196), and the British Heart Foundation (AA/18/2/3218). D.F.-R. receives research grants from Abbott. He is listed as an inventor on two issued patents: EP3636147A1 (method for the identification of cardiac fibrillation drivers and/or the footprint of rotational activations) and PCT/EP2022/071364 (system and method of assessment of electromechanical remodelling). A.G. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific and was partially supported by the European Union MAESTRIA (grant agreement 965286). K.G.H. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Abbott, Alexion, Amarin, Astra Zeneca, Bayer Healthcare, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, BMS/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Novaris, Portola, Premier Research, Sanofi, SUN Pharma, and W. L. Gore and Associates. J.S.H. receives speaking fees from BMS/Pfizer, Bayer, Servier, and Boston Scientific and consulting fees from Bayer and Boston Scientific. He receives research grants from BMS/Pfizer, Servier, Novartis, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. H.H. receives lecture and consulting fees from Bayer, Biotronik, BMS/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Milestone Pharmaceuticals, Centrix India, C.T.I. Germany, ESC, Medscape, and Springer Healthcare Ltd. He receives research grants (paid to the institution of employment, University of Antwerp and/or University of Hasselt) from Abbott, Bayer, Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Fibricheck/Qompium, Medtronic, and BMS/Pfizer. Z.H. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS/Pfizer, and Roche Diagnostics. He was partially supported by The Swedish Society for Medical Research (S17-0133), Hjärt-Lungfonden (The Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, 20200722), and the institution he is currently employed at (Uppsala University Hospital). L.H.-M. receives research grants from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PID2020-116927RB-C21) and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER). D.K. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Bayer, Amomed, and Protherics Medicines Development. He receives research grants from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR CDF-2015-08-074 RAE-AF; NIHR130280 DaRe2THINK; NIHR13274 D2T-NeuroVascular; and NIHR203326 Biomedical Research Centre), the British Heart Foundation (PG/17/55/33087, AA/182/3218, and FS/CDRF/21/21032), the EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative (BigData@Heart 116074), EU Horizon and UKRI (HYPERMARKER 101095480) UK National Health Service—Data for R&D-Subnational Secure Data Environment programme, UK Department for Business, Energy Industrial Strategy Regulators Pioneer Fund, the Cook & Wolstenholme Charitable Trust, and the European Society of Cardiology supported by educational grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS/Pfizer, Alliance, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Boston Scientific, the NIHR/University of Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, and the British Hear Foundation, the University of Birmingham Accelerator Award (STEEER-AF). J.L.M. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Biotronik, Medtronic, MicroPort, and Milestone Pharmaceuticals. A.M. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Medtronic, Biosense Webster, and Boston Scientific and lecture fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, BMS, and Bayer. L.M. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Johnson & Johnson. G.A.N. receives lecture fees from AliveCor, consultant fees from Biosense Webster, and research grants from Abbott and Biosense Webster. H.P. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, Medtronic, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, and Pfizer. P.S. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, CathRx, and PaceMate (paid to the institution of employment). He is currently employed at the University of Adelaide, which receives research grants from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Becton-Dickenson. R.B.S. receives consulting fees/honoraria from BMS/Pfizer. She was partially supported by the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement 648131 and 847770), German Center for Cardiovascular Research supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (DZHK, grant numbers 81Z1710103 and 81Z0710114), German Ministry of Research and Education (BMBF 01ZX1408A), ERACoSysMed3 (031L0239), Wolfgang Seefried project funding German Heart Foundation. U.S. receives consulting fees/honoraria from University Svizzerra Italiana, Stanford, and Johnson & Johnson and research grants from the European Union, Dutch Heart Foundation, Roche, and EP Solution. He is a shareholder of YourRhythmics B.V. T.T. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Boston Scientific and Medtronic. I.C.v.G. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Bayer (paid to the institution of employment). She is currently employed at the University of Groningen. K.V. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Abbott, Philips, Medtronic, Biosense Webster, and Boston Scientific and research grants from Medtronic and Biosense Webster. R.W. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Abiomed, and Zoll and a research grant from Boston Scientific, BMS/Pfizer, and Abiomed. S.W. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and Bayer Vital and a research grant from Boston Scientific. All remaining authors (G.B., J.C.N., T.D.P., N.D., M.F., E.G., S.H., S.K., D.L., K.M.-R., M.O., A.S.P., U.R., M.R., D.S., C.S., G.S., D.S., S.T., R.H.v.L., and S.Z.) have declared no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Electrical storm (ES) is a state of electrical instability, manifesting as recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) over a short period of time (three or more episodes of sustained VA within 24 h, separated by at least 5 min, requiring termination by an intervention). The clinical presentation can vary, but ES is usually a cardiac emergency. Electrical storm mainly affects patients with structural or primary electrical heart disease, often with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Management of ES requires a multi-faceted approach and the involvement of multi-disciplinary teams, but despite advanced treatment and often invasive procedures, it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. With an ageing population, longer survival of heart failure patients, and an increasing number of patients with ICD, the incidence of ES is expected to increase. This European Heart Rhythm Association clinical consensus statement focuses on pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and acute and long-term management of patients presenting with ES or clustered VA., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Radosław Lenarczyk – nothing to declare, Katja Zeppenfeld – nothing to declare, Jacob Tfelt-Hansen – support received by himself or his institution related to this work - John and Birte Meyer Family Foundation, any other financial support: Johnson and Johnson, Microport, Cytokinetics and Leo Pharma, Frank R. Heinzel – nothing to declare, Thomas Deneke speaker honoraria- Biotronik, Abbott, Biosense Webster, voted member German Cardiology Society leadership team, Elena Ene - travel and proctorship honoraria from Johnson&Johnson, Christian Meyer - Abbott: speaker, Biotronik: consultant, Biosense Webster: consultant, Boston Scientific: consultant, speaker, Arthur Wilde - Associate editor Heart Rhythm, Chair DSMB LEAP trial (unpaid), Member scientific advisory board ARMGO & ThryvTherapeutics (unpaid), Elena Arbelo - Consulting for Bayer and Biosense Webster, Ewa Jędrzejczyk-Patej – nothing to declare, Avi Sabbag – nothing to declare, Markus Stühlinger - speaker honoraria (Biotronik, Medtronic), Luigi di Biase - consultant for Biosense Webster, Stereoataxis and I-Rhythm, has received speaker honoraria/travel from Biosense Webster, St. Jude Medical (now Abbott), Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Biotronik, Atricure, Baylis and Zoll, Marmar Vaseghi – grants NIH R01HL1706262, NIH R01HL148190, honorarium for educational speaking/courses/seminars from Zoll Inc. Medtronic Inc. and Biosense Webster Inc., minor stock in NeuCures Inc, Ohad Ziv – nothing to declare, William-Fernando Bautista-Vargas – nothing to declare, Saurabh Kumar – nothing to declare, Narayanan Namboodiri – nothing to declare, Benhur Davi Henz – nothing to declare, Jose Montero Cabezas - Shockwave Inc- research funding, Penumbra Inc- speaker fees, Nikolaos Dagres – nothing to declare, Peichl Petr – Astra Zeneca, Promed, Abbott, Medtronic, Biotronik, Biosense Webster: speaker fees, consultancy, Frontera Antonio – Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster: speaker fees, consultancy, Tzeis Stylianos – Bayer, Pfizer: speaker fees, consultancy, Merino Jose Luis – Sanofi Aventis, Microport, Medtronic, Milestone Pharmaceutical, Biotronik, Zoll Medical: speaker fees, consultancy, Bayer: travel and meeting support, Daiichi Sankyo : Clinical Trial participation, Principal investigator, Milestone : Clinical trial participation, Principal investigator, Abbott : Fellow support, Principal investigator, Medtronic : Fellow support, Principal investigator, Soejima Kyoko – Abbott, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Johnson and Johnson: speaker fees, consultancy, de Chillou Christian – Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster: speaker fees, consultancy, Tung Roderick – Biotronik, Medtronic, Abbott: speaker fees, consultancy, Eckardt Lars - nothing to declare, Maury Philippe - nothing to declare, Hlivak Peter – Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bayer, Novo-Nordisk: speaker fees, consultancy, Tereshchenko Larisa - nothing to declare, Kojodjojo Pipin - nothing to declare Atie Jacob - Johnson & Johnson: speaker fees, consultancy, Boston Scientific: travel and meeting support., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a cardiac arrhythmia frequently documented in patients requiring implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and/or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D). Patients with diagnosed AF at the point of ICD or CRT-D implantation may have an impaired follow-up outcome., Methods: The German DEVICE I-II registry is a nationwide prospective multicentre database of patients implanted with ICD and CRT-D with clinical follow-up data. We analysed a 1-year follow up of implanted patients with AF and with sinus rhythm (SR)., Results: A total of 4,929 ICD/CRT patients are included in the present analysis: 946 (19.2%) were in AF and 3,983 (80.8%) were SR at time of device implantation. AF patients had a significantly more comorbid profile including older age {72 [interquartile range (IQR), 66-77] vs. 66 (IQR, 56-73) years; P<0.001}, and higher rate of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <30% (68.2% vs. 61.0%; P<0.001), peripheral artery disease (4.5% vs. 2.7%; P=0.002), diabetes (33.6% vs. 25.5%; P<0.001), hypertension (58.4% vs. 51.1%; P<0.001) and renal failure (22.6% vs. 15.3%; P<0.001). The intra-hospital complication rate was 4.3% in the AF and 3.6% in the SR group (P=0.38). In 1-year follow-up AF patients experienced a significantly higher rate of defibrillator shocks (25% vs. 15.3%; P<0.001). One-year estimated mortality was 10.8% in the AF and 5.9% in the SR group (P<0.001), while estimated 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) rate was 11.2% vs. 7.0% (P<0.001). The effects of AF on electrical shocks and mortality persisted after adjusting for age, sex, advanced New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, severely impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic renal failure (CRF), QRS duration, and type of indication for electronic device implantation., Conclusions: Our clinical data on an extended cohort of contemporary patients confirm the significant impact of AF, and its associated comorbidities, upon mortality and major adverse events after implantation of ICD/CRT., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-274/coif). G.D. serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Journal of Thoracic Disease from February 2023 to January 2025. H.I. received an institutional research grant from Boston Scientific. J.K. received honoraria for lectures and travel grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific and Biotronik. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disorder of unknown etiology. The leading hypothesis involves an antigen-triggered dysregulated T-cell-driven immunologic response leading to non-necrotic granulomas. In cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), the inflammatory response can lead to fibrosis, culminating in clinical manifestations such as atrioventricular block and ventricular arrhythmias. Cardiac manifestations frequently present as first and isolated signs or may appear in conjunction with extracardiac manifestations. The incidence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is high. Diagnosis remains a challenge. For a definite diagnosis, endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is suggested. In clinical practice, compatible findings in advanced imaging using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and/or positron emission tomography (PET) in combination with extracardiac histological proof is considered sufficient. Management revolves around the control of myocardial inflammation by employing immunosuppression. However, data regarding efficacy are merely based on observational evidence. Prevention of SCD is of particular importance and several guidelines provide recommendations regarding device therapy. In patients with manifest CS, outcome data indicate a 5-year survival of around 90% and a 10-year survival in the range of 80%. Data for patients with silent CS are conflicting; some studies suggest an overall benign course of disease while others reported contrasting observations. Future research challenges involve better understanding of the immunologic pathogenesis of the disease for a targeted therapy, improving imaging to aid early diagnosis, assessing the need for screening of asymptomatic patients and randomized trials.

Patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) often report psychological distress. Literature suggests that patients with physical disease often compare their well-being and coping to fellow patients. However, we lack knowledge on social comparison among patients with ICD. In this study, we examined psychological distress and social comparison selection in patients with (ICD+) and without experienced ICD shocks (ICD-). We theorized that relative to ICD- patients, those with ICD+ display higher levels of psychological distress and thereby compare more frequently with fellow patients with more severe disease, but better disease coping and try to identify more strongly with these standards to improve their own coping. We recruited 92 patients with (ICD+, n = 38) and without an experienced ICD shock (ICD-, n = 54), who selected one of four comparison standards varying in disease severity and coping capacity. Relative to ICD-, ICD+ patients reported higher levels of device-related distress, but there were no significant differences in anxiety, depression, or quality of life. ICD+ patients selected more often comparison standards with poor coping and, irrespective of standard choice, displayed more negative mood following comparison. Our results show that ICD+ patients tend to perform unfavorable comparisons to fellow patients, which might explain higher psychological distress and worse coping. These findings warrant further research into social comparison as a relevant coping mechanism in ICD patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Over the last three decades, what is referred to as Brugada syndrome (BrS) has developed from a clinical observation of initially a few cases of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the absence of structural heart disease with ECG signs of "atypical right bundle brunch block" to a predominantly electrocardiographic, and to a lesser extent genetic, diagnosis. Today, BrS is diagnosed in patients without overt structural heart disease and a spontaneous Brugada type 1 ECG pattern regardless of symptoms. The diagnosis of BrS is less clear in those with an only transient or drug-induced type 1 Brugada pattern, but should be considered in the presence of an arrhythmic syncope, family history of BrS, or family history of sudden death. In addition to survived cardiac arrest, syncope is probably the single most decisive risk marker for future arrhythmias. For asymptomatic BrS, risk stratification remains challenging. General recommendations to lower the risk in BrS include avoidance of drugs/agents known to induce and/or increase right precordial ST-segment elevation, including treatment of fever with antipyretic drugs. Several ECG markers that have been associated with an increased risk of SCD have been incorporated into a recently published risk score for BrS. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the status of risk stratification and to illustrate open issues und gaps in evidence in BrS., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: The use of SGLT-2 inhibitors has revolutionized heart failure therapy. Evidence suggests a reduced incidence of ventricular and atrial arrhythmias in patients with dapagliflozin or empagliflozin treatment. It is unclear to what extent the reduced arrhythmia burden is due to direct effects of the SGLT2 inhibitors or is solely a marker of improved cardiac function., Methods: One hundred five rabbit hearts were allocated to eight groups and retrogradely perfused, employing a Langendorff setup. Action potential duration at 90% of repolarization (APD 90 ), QT intervals, effective refractory periods, conduction velocity, and dispersion of repolarization were obtained with monophasic action potential catheters. A model for tachyarrhythmias was established with the I Kr blocker erythromycin for QT prolongation associated proarrhythmia as well as the potassium channel opener pinacidil for a short-QT model. An atrial fibrillation (AF) model was created with isoproterenol and acetylcholine. With increasing concentrations of both SGLT2 inhibitors, reductions in QT intervals and APD 90 were observed, accompanied by a slight increase in ventricular arrhythmia episodes. During drug-induced proarrhythmia, empagliflozin succeeded in decreasing QT intervals, APD 90 , and VT burden whereas dapagliflozin demonstrated no significant effects. In the presence of pinacidil induced arrhythmogenicity, neither SGLT2 inhibitor had a significant impact on cardiac electrophysiology. In the AF setting, perfusion with dapagliflozin showed significant suppression of AF in the course of restitution of electrophysiological parameters whereas empagliflozin showed no significant effect on atrial fibrillation incidence., Conclusion: In this model, empagliflozin and dapagliflozin demonstrated opposite antiarrhythmic properties. Empagliflozin reduced ventricular tachyarrhythmias whereas dapagliflozin showed effective suppression of atrial arrhythmias., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2024 Wolfes, Uphoff, Kemena, Wegner, Rath, Eckardt, Frommeyer and Ellermann.)

Purpose of Review: Arrhythmias are common in patients with heart failure (HF) and are associated with a significant risk of mortality and morbidity. Optimal antiarrhythmic treatment is therefore essential. Here, we review current approaches to antiarrhythmic treatment in patients with HF., Recent Findings: In atrial fibrillation, rhythm control and ventricular rate control are accepted therapeutic strategies. In recent years, clinical trials have demonstrated a prognostic benefit of early rhythm control strategies and AF catheter ablation, especially in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Prevention of sudden cardiac death with ICD therapy is essential, but optimal risk stratification is challenging. For ventricular tachycardias, recent data support early consideration of catheter ablation. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy is an adjunctive therapy in symptomatic patients but has no prognostic benefit and well-recognized (proarrhythmic) adverse effects. Antiarrhythmic therapy in HF requires a systematic, multimodal approach, starting with guideline-directed medical therapy for HF and integrating pharmacological, device, and interventional therapy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Aims: In-hospital complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), and ventricular tachycardia (VT) may be overestimated by analyses of administrative data., Methods and Results: We determined the incidences of in-hospital mortality, major bleeding, and stroke around AF, AFL, and VT ablations in four German tertiary centres between 2005 and 2020. All cases were coded by the G-DRG- and OPS-systems. Uniform code search terms were applied defining both the types of ablations for AF, AFL, and VT and the occurrence of major adverse events including femoral vascular complications, iatrogenic tamponade, stroke, and in-hospital death. Importantly, all complications were individually reviewed based on patient-level source records. Overall, 43 031 ablations were analysed (30 361 AF; 9364 AFL; 3306 VT). The number of ablations/year more than doubled from 2005 (n = 1569) to 2020 (n = 3317) with 3 times and 2.5 times more AF and VT ablations in 2020 (n = 2404 and n = 301, respectively) as compared to 2005 (n = 817 and n = 120, respectively), but a rather stable number of AFL ablations (n = 554 vs. n = 612). Major peri-procedural complications occurred in 594 (1.4%) patients. Complication rates were 1.1% (n = 325) for AF, 1.0% (n = 95) for AFL, and 5.3% (n = 175) for VT. With an increase in complex AF/VT procedures, the overall complication rate significantly increased (0.76% in 2005 vs. 1.81% in 2020; P = 0.004); but remained low over time. Following patient-adjudication, all in-hospital cardiac tamponades (0.7%) and strokes (0.2%) were related to ablation. Major femoral vascular complications requiring surgical intervention occurred in 0.4% of all patients. The in-hospital mortality rate adjudicated to be ablation-related was lower than the coded mortality rate: AF: 0.03% vs. 0.04%; AFL: 0.04% vs. 0.14%; VT: 0.42% vs. 1.48%., Conclusion: Major adverse events are low and comparable after catheter ablation for AFL and AF (∼1.0%), whereas they are five times higher for VT ablations. In the presence of an increase in complex ablation procedures, a moderate but significant increase in overall complications from 2005-20 was observed. Individual case analysis demonstrated a lower than coded ablation-related in-hospital mortality. This highlights the importance of individual case adjudication when analysing administrative data., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: L.E. discloses consultant fees, speaking honoraria, and travel expenses from Abbott, Bayer Healthcare, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Boehringer, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Pfizer, and Sanofi Aventis. Research has been supported by German Research Foundation (DFG) and German Heart Foundation outside the submitted work. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest regarding this study., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Cryoballoon ablation is a widely used single-shot technique for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Procedural endpoints ensuring maximal PVI durability are important., Objective: To assess the performance of cryoablation procedural markers to predict long-term PVI., Methods: In a single center, consecutive patients who underwent redo ablation with high-density mapping for symptomatic AF recurrence after cryoballoon ablation were included and cryoballoon procedural data were collected, including temperature values at 30 and 60 s, time to isolation, nadir temperature and the velocity of temperature decline estimated with the temperature/time catch-up point (T2T-Catch-Up) defined as positive when the freeze temperature in minus degree equals the time in seconds after cryoablation initiation (e.g. - 15 °C in the first 15 s of the ablation impulse)., Results: 47 patients (62% male; 58.3 ± 11.2 years) were included. Overall, 38 (80.9%) patients had ≥ 1 reconnected PV. Among 186 PVs, 56 (30.1%; 1.2 per patient on average) were reconnected. Univariate analysis revealed T2T-Catch-Up in 103 (56%) and more frequent in durably isolated than in reconnected PVs (93 [72%] vs 10 [19%], p < 0.0001). Among binary endpoints, T2T-Catch-Up had the highest specificity (82%) and predictive value for durable PVI at redo ablation (90%). In multivariable analyses, absence of T2T-Catch-Up (Odds-ratio 0.12, 95% CI [0.05-0.31], p < 0.0001) and right superior PV (Odds-ratio 3.14, 95% CI [1.27-7.74], p = 0.01) were the only variables independently associated with PV reconnection., Conclusion: T2T-Catch-Up, a new and simple cryoballoon procedural endpoint demonstrated excellent predictive value and strong statistical association with durable PVI., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Early repolarization pattern (ERP) has been associated with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) and with cardiovascular mortality in the general population. As there is limited data about long- term outcome of IVF, the aim of our study was to observe ventricular arrhythmia (VA) recurrences in these patients and to identify a possible correlation of VA with ECG markers of early repolarization., Methods and Results: We investigated 56 consecutive IVF patients who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for secondary prevention. ERP was defined as a J-point elevation ≥ 0.1 mV in two or more contiguous inferior or lateral leads. Markers of early repolarization were present in 32.1% of cases with a preponderance of QRS slurring (77.8%). During a mean follow-up of 41.2 months, 11 patients (19.6%) received in total 18 adequate ICD-therapies. VF was most the common cause for ICDtherapy (61.1%) but monomorphic VT also occurred in four patients. Presence of ERP was associated with a significant trend towards arrhythmia recurrences. 38.9% patients with ERP received appropriate ICD-therapies whereas only 10.5% of patients without ERP had arrhythmia recurrence (p = 0.05). Inappropriate ICD-therapies occurred in seven patients (12.5%) with a non-significant trend towards a higher incidence in patients with a transvenous ICD (p = 0.15)., Conclusion: A significant correlation between ERP and VA recurrences in patients with IVF could be observed. Though monomorphic VA also play a role in the studied IVF-population, our data support the use of the S-ICD in this collective., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Lidocaine is classified as a class Ib anti-arrhythmic that blocks voltage- and pH-dependent sodium channels. It exhibits well investigated anti-arrhythmic effects and has been the anti-arrhythmic of choice for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias for several decades. Lidocaine binds primarily to inactivated sodium channels, decreases the action potential duration, and increases the refractory period. It increases the ventricular fibrillatory threshold and can interrupt life-threatening tachycardias caused by re-entrant mechanisms, especially in ischemic tissue. Its use was pushed into the background in the era of amiodarone and modern electric device therapy. Recently, lidocaine has come back into focus for the treatment of acute sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In this brief overview, we review the clinical pharmacology including possible side effects, the historical course, possible indications, and current Guideline recommendations for the use of lidocaine., (© 2023 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Electrocardiographic findings and arrhythmias are common in cardiomyopathies. Both may be an early indication of a specific diagnosis or may occur due to myocardial fibrosis and/or reduced contractility. Brady- and tachyarrhythmias significantly contribute to increased morbidity and mortality in patients with cardiomyopathies. Antiarrhythmic therapy including risk stratification is often challenging and plays a major role for these patients. Thus, an "electrophysiological" perspective on guidelines on cardiomyopathies may be warranted. As the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has recently published a new guideline for the management of cardiomyopathies, this overview aims to present key messages of these guidelines. Innovations include a new phenotype-based classification system with emphasis on a multimodal imaging approach for diagnosis and risk stratification. The guideline includes detailed chapters on dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and their phenocopies, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, and restrictive cardiomyopathy as well as syndromic and metabolic cardiomyopathies. Patient pathways guide clinicians from the initial presentation to diagnosis. The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and genetic testing during diagnostic work-up is stressed. Concepts of rhythm and rate control for atrial fibrillation have led to new recommendations, and the role of defibrillator therapy in primary prevention is discussed in detail. Whilst providing general guidelines for management, the primary objective of the guideline is to ascertain the disease etiology and disease-specific, individualized management., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective and Background: Catheter-based treatment of patients with ventricular arrhythmias (VA) reduces VA and mortality in selected patients. With regard to potential risks of catheter ablation, a benefit-risk assessment should be carried out. This can be performed with risk scores such as the recently published "Risk in Ventricular Ablation (RIVA) Score". We sought to validate this score and to test for possible additional predictors in a large database of VT ablations., Methods and Results: We analyzed 1964 catheter ablations for VA in patients with (1069; 54.4%) and without (893, 45.6%) structural heart disease (SHD) and observed an overall major adverse event rate of 4.0% with an in-hospital mortality of 1.3% with significantly less complications occurring in patients without structural heart disease (6.5% vs. 1.1%; p ≤ 0.01). The RIVA Score demonstrated to be a valid predictive tool for major in-hospital complications (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.12, 1.25; p ≤ 0.001). NYHA Class ≥ III (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.5, 4.2; p < 0.001) and age (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.02, 1.07; p ≤ 0.001) proved to be additional predictive parameters. Hence, a modified RIVA Score (mRIVA) model was analyzed with a subset of established predictors (SHD, eGFR, epicardial puncture) as well as new predictive parameters (age, NYHA Class ≥ III), that achieved a higher predictive value for major complications compared with the model based on all RIVA variables., Conclusion: Adding age and functional heart failure status (NYHA class) as simple clinical parameters to the recently published RIVA Score increases the predictive value for ablation-associated complications in a large VT ablations registry., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Aims -Electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiographic left atrial (LA) parameters may be helpful to assess the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) in embolic stroke of unknown etiology (ESUS) and could therefore guide intensity of ECG monitoring. Methods -1153 consecutive patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) were analyzed. An internal loop recorder (ILR) was implanted in 104 consecutive patients with ESUS. Multiple morphologic P-wave parameters in baseline 12-channel ECG and echocardiographic LA parameters were measured and analyzed in patients with and without ILR-detected AF. Using logistic regression, we evaluated the predictive value of several ECG parameters and LA dimensions on the occurrence of AF. Results -In 20 of 104 (19%) patients, AF was diagnosed by ILR during a mean monitoring time of 575 (IQR 470-580) days. Patients with AF were significantly older (72 (67-75) vs. 60 (52-72) years; p = 0.001) and premature atrial contractions (PAC) were more frequently observed (40% vs. 2%; p < 0.001) during baseline ECG. All morphologic P-wave parameters did not show a significant difference between groups. There was a non-significant trend towards a larger LA volume index (31 (24-36) vs. 29 (25-37) mL/m 2 ; p = 0.09) in AF patients. Conclusions -Age and PAC are independently associated with incident AF in ESUS and could be used as markers for selecting patients that may benefit from more extensive rhythm monitoring or ILR implantation. In our consecutive cohort of patients with ESUS, neither morphological P-wave parameters nor LA size were predictive of AF.

Background: Left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI) may improve rhythm control in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF) patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA). However, LAPWI may be challenging when using thermal energy sources., Objective: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of LAPWI performed by non-thermal pulsed field ablation (PFA) in CA for persAF., Methods: Consecutive persAF patients from two German centers were prospectively enrolled. There were two study cohorts: (1) the LAPWI cohort, which included PFA-guided (re-)PVI with LAPWI for first-time and/or repeat ablation procedures; and (2) a comparative persAF cohort with a PFA PVI-only approach without LAPWI for first-time ablation within the same timeframe. Patients were followed up by routine Holter ECGs., Results: In total, 79 persistent AF patients were included in the study: 59/79 patients were enrolled in the LAPWI cohort, including 16/59 index (27%) and 43/59 repeat ablation procedures (73%). Sixteen patients (16/79; 21%) were in the PVI-only cohort without LAPWI. Of the patients treated with LAPWI, procedure time and fluoroscopy time was 91 ± 30 min and 15 ± 7 min, respectively. The acute PVI rate was 100% in all first-time ablation patients (32 patients (16 PVI only, 16 PVI plus LAPWI), 196/196 PVs). Of the 43 re-do patients in the LAPWI cohort, re-PVI was necessary in 33% (14/43) of patients (27 PVs; 1.9 PV per-patient); in 67% (29/43), all PVs were isolated, and antral ablation of the PV ostia was performed in 48% (14/29). LAPWI was performed successfully in all 59 (100%) patients of the LAPWI cohort. Two minor complications occurred. No esophageal lesion was detected in the LAPWI cohort (n = 33/59 (56%) patients underwent endoscopy). After 354 ± 197 days of follow-up, freedom from atrial arrhythmias was 79.3% (95-CI: 62-95%) in the complete LAPWI cohort (n = 14/59 (24%) on AAD: class Ic n = 9, class III n = 5). There was no difference regarding acute procedural and clinical outcome compared to the PVI-only cohort., Conclusion: LAPWI guided by PFA is feasible and safe in patients undergoing CA for persAF and shows favorable outcomes. In the context of durable PVI, PFA-guided LAPWI may be an effective adjunctive treatment option.

Introduction: This study provides an update of survey-based data providing an overview of interventional electrophysiology over the last decade. Overall infrastructure, procedures, and training opportunities in Germany were assessed., Methods: By analyzing mandatory quality reports, German cardiology centres performing electrophysiological studies were identified to repeat a questionnaire from 2010 and 2015., Results: A complete questionnaire was returned by 192 centers performing about 75% of all ablations in Germany in 2020. In the presence of the COVID-19 pandemic, a total of 76.304 procedures including 68.407 ablations were reported representing a 38% increase compared to 2015. The median number of ablations increased from 180 in 2010 to 377 in 2020. AF was the most common arrhythmia ablated (51 vs. 35% in 2010). PVI with radiofrequency point-by-point ablation (64%) and cryo-balloon ablation (34%) were the preferred strategies. Less than 50 (75) PVI were performed by 31% (36%) of all centres. Only 25 and 24% of participating centres fulfilled EHRA and national requirements for training centre accreditation, respectively. There was a high number of EP centres with no fellows (38%). The proportion of female fellows in EP increased from 26% in 2010 to 33% in 2020., Conclusion: Comparing 2020, 2010 and 2015, an increasing number of EP centres and procedures were registered. In 2020, more than every second ablation was for therapy of AF. In the presence of an increasing number of procedures, training opportunities were still limited, and most centres did not fulfill recommended EHRA or national requirements for accreditation., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Sudden cardiac death and ventricular arrhythmias are a global health issue. Recently, a new guideline for the management of ventricular arrhythmias and prevention of sudden cardiac death has been published by the European Society of Cardiology that serves as an update to the 2015 guideline on this topic. This review focuses on 10 novel key aspects of the current guideline: As new aspects, public basic life support and access to defibrillators are guideline topics. Recommendations for the diagnostic evaluation of patients with ventricular arrhythmias are structured according to frequently encountered clinical scenarios. Management of electrical storm has become a new focus. In addition, genetic testing and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging significantly gained relevance for both diagnostic evaluation and risk stratification. New algorithms for antiarrhythmic drug therapy aim at improving safe drug use. The new recommendations reflect increasing relevance of catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias, especially in patients without structural heart disease or stable coronary artery disease with only mildly impaired ejection fraction and haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardias. Regarding sudden cardiac death risk stratification, risk calculators for laminopathies, and long QT syndrome are now considered besides the already established risk calculator for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Generally, 'new' risk markers beyond left ventricular ejection fraction are increasingly considered for recommendations on primary preventive implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Furthermore, new recommendations for diagnosis of Brugada syndrome and management of primary electrical disease have been included. With many comprehensive flowcharts and practical algorithms, the new guideline takes a step towards a user-oriented reference book., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: We disclose that in the past 2 years, L.E. received lecture fees from Abbott, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Daichii Sankyo, Medtronic, Biotronik, Sanofi Aventis, Bristol Myers Squibb. K.Z. received funding from Biosense Webster for research in electrophysiology. J.L.M. received direct payment for his personal services from Sanofi Aventis, Boston Scientific, Medtronic and Microport and research funding from Abbott, Daichii Sankyo, Biotronik and Milestone, his department received payment from Biosense, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic and Biotronik. C.S. received direct payment for his personal services from Biosense Webster, Abbott, Microport, Boston Scientific, Medtronic and Biotronik, travel, and meeting support from Biotronik and research funding from Medtronic. J.T.-H. received travel and meeting support from Abbott and Medtronic and direct personal payment from Leo Pharma. N.D. and H.K. disclose that there is no possible conflict of interest., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Even though the interest in machine learning studies is growing significantly, especially in medicine, the imbalance between study results and clinical relevance is more pronounced than ever. The reasons for this include data quality and interoperability issues. Hence, we aimed at examining site- and study-specific differences in publicly available standard electrocardiogram (ECG) datasets, which in theory should be interoperable by consistent 12-lead definition, sampling rate, and measurement duration. The focus lies upon the question of whether even slight study peculiarities can affect the stability of trained machine learning models. To this end, the performances of modern network architectures as well as unsupervised pattern detection algorithms are investigated across different datasets. Overall, this is intended to examine the generalization of machine learning results of single-site ECG studies.

A new guideline for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death has been published by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Beside the 2017 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Rhythm Society (AHA/ACC/HRS) guideline and the 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CCS/CHRS) position statement, this guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice. As these recommendations are periodically updated integrating the latest scientific evidence, there are similarities in many aspects. Nevertheless, notable differences in the recommendations can be found resulting from different scopes and publication years, differences in data selection, interpretation, and weighing, and regional factors such as differing drug availability. The aim of this paper is to compare specific recommendations to identify differences while acknowledging the commonalities and to provide an overview of the status of current recommendations with a special emphasis on gaps in evidence and future directions of research. Overall, the recent ESC guideline places a greater emphasis on the value of cardiac magnetic resonance, genetic testing in cardiomyopathies and arrhythmia syndromes, and the use of risk calculators for risk stratification. Further significant differences can be found regarding diagnostic criteria for genetic arrhythmia syndromes, the management of hemodynamically well-tolerated ventricular tachycardia, and primary preventive implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Eckardt has received lecture fees from Abbott, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Biotronik, Sanofi Aventis, and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Zeppenfeld has received research funding from Biosense Webster (research electrophysiology). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)