1. Effects of fortified eggs and time-restricted eating on cardiometabolic health: The prosperity trial.
- Author
-
Nouhravesh N, Harrington J, Aberle LH, Green CL, Voss K, Holdsworth D, Misialek K, Slaugh BT, Wieand M, Yancy WS Jr, Pagidipati N, and Mentz RJ
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Aged, Cholesterol, HDL blood, Cholesterol, LDL blood, Biomarkers blood, Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Eggs, Food, Fortified, Cardiovascular Diseases prevention & control
- Abstract
Background: Given the increasing interest in dietary interventions to improve cardiovascular health, this trial assessed the impact of fortified eggs (FE) versus nonegg supplemented diet and time-restricted eating (TRE) versus usual care diet on cardiovascular biomarkers., Methods: The study was a unblinded, 2-by-2 factorial design, which randomized patients, with either a prior cardiovascular event or 2 cardiovascular risk factors, to FE or a nonegg supplemented diet and TRE or usual care diet. Patients randomized to FE were instructed to consume at least 12 FE/week (with eggs provided); those on a nonegg supplemented diet restricted egg consumption to <2 eggs/week. TRE participants were instructed to consume all calories within an 8-hour window daily and fasted for the remaining 16 hours. Patients randomized to usual diet were advised to maintain current dietary habits. Follow-up was performed in-person at 1 and 4 months, and telephone calls at 2 and 3 months. Co-primary endpoints were 4-month LDL- and HDL-cholesterol. Secondary endpoints included additional lipids, cardiometabolic- and inflammatory biomarkers and micronutrient levels at 4-months., Results: Overall, 140 patients were randomized with median (25th, 75th percentiles) age 66 (58, 73) years; 72 (51%) women, 38 (27%) Black, and 33 (24%) with diabetes mellitus. The difference in least squares (LS) means from baseline to 4-months for HDL and LDL levels revealed no significant clinical difference between FE vs nonegg supplemented diet (HDL: -0.64 mg/dL [95% CI: -3.86, 2.58]; LDL: -3.14 mg/dL [-10.81, 4.52]) and TRE vs usual care diet (HDL: 1.51 mg/dL [-1.65, 4.68]; LDL 1.17 mg/dL [-6.36, 8.70]). Prespecified subgroups revealed a nonsignificant HDL increase and LDL decrease with FE in patients ≥65 years., Conclusions: These data did not demonstrate clinically relevant differences in changes in LDL and HDL levels over 4 months with FE and TRE compared with nonegg supplemented diet and usual care diet, respectively, providing evidence that adverse short-term lipid and biomarker changes did not occur with FE consumption., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04673721., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest NN received speaker fees from AstraZeneca and Bayer. RJM received research support from Eggland's Best to his institution to support the trial. NJP received research support from Alnylam, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eggland's Best, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Merck. Consultation/Advisory Panels for Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CRISPR Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Esperion, AstraZeneca, Merck, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk. Executive Committee member for trials sponsored by Novo Nordisk and by Amgen. DSMB for trials sponsored by J+J and Novartis. Medical advisory board for Miga Health. DH, KM, BTS and MW are employees of Eggland's Best, LLC, Malvern, PA, USA. JH has no disclosures., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF