Search

Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic disrupted respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) seasonality. To optimize the use and evaluation of RSV infant immunization strategies, monitoring changes in RSV epidemiology is essential., Methods: Hospitalizations for acute respiratory infections (ARIs) and RSV-coded ARI in children <2 years were extracted in 4 European hospitals, according to predefined case definitions (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes). Prepandemic RSV seasons (2017-2018 to 2019-2020) were compared to 2021-2022 and 2022-2023., Results: In 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, the peak number of RSV hospitalizations was higher than prepandemic peaks after short periods of RSV circulation, and lower than prepandemic peaks after long periods of RSV circulation. A greater proportion of RSV hospitalizations occurred in children 1 to <2 years in 2021-2022 in the Netherlands (18% vs 9%, P = .04). No increase in age was observed elsewhere. High-risk children represented a greater proportion of RSV hospitalizations during the pandemic. The proportion of pediatric intensive care unit admissions did not increase., Conclusions: A decrease in population immunity has been linked to older age at RSV hospitalization. We did not observe an increase in age in 3 of the 4 participating countries. Broad age categories may have prevented detecting an age shift. Monitoring RSV epidemiology is essential as Europe implements RSV immunization., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. J. G. W. has been an investigator for clinical trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies, including AstraZeneca, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Janssen, and participated in the advisory boards of Janssen and Sanofi and was a speaker at a Sanofi sponsored symposium (all fees/honoraria were paid to UMCU). T. H. has received honoraria for lectures or participation in advisory boards or data monitoring committees from Janssen, Sanofi, Enanta, MSD, Pfizer, Moderna, and Shionogi. A. D.-U. participated in clinical trials for vaccines, monoclonals, and antivirals for RSV as a subinvestigator. All honoraria were paid to the institution. F. M.-T. reports honoraria from GSK, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, MSD, Seqirus, Biofabri, and Janssen for taking part in advisory boards and expert meetings and for acting as a speaker in congresses, outside the submitted work; and principal investigator role in randomized controlled trials for GSK, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, MSD, Seqirus, Biofabri, Janssen, Ablynx, Gilead, Regeneron, Roche, Abbott, Novavax, and MedImmune, with honoraria paid to his institution. S. C. has provided consultancy or investigator roles in relation to product development for Ablynx, Janssen, MedImmune, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, GSK, Vertex, AbbVie, and Boehringer Ingelheim, with fees paid to the University of Edinburgh. L. J. B. has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners. He has not received personal fees or other personal benefits. UMCU has received major funding (>€100 000 per industrial partner) for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD, and MeMed Diagnostics. UMCU has received major funding for the RSV GOLD study from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. UMCU has received major funding as part of the public-private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU and PROMISE projects with partners GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi. UMCU has received major funding by Julius Clinical for participating in clinical studies sponsored by MedImmune and Pfizer. UMCU received minor funding (€1000–€25 000 per industrial partner) for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, GSK, Novavax, Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, MSD, Sanofi, Janssen. L. B. is the founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the second most common pathogen causing infant mortality. Additionally, RSV is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults (age ≥60 years) similar to influenza. A protein-based maternal vaccine and monoclonal antibody (mAb) are now market-approved to protect infants, while an mRNA and two protein-based vaccines are approved for older adults. First-year experience protecting infants with nirsevimab in high-income countries shows a major public health benefit. It is expected that the RSV vaccine landscape will continue to develop in the coming years to protect all people globally. The vaccine and mAb landscape remain active with 30 candidates in clinical development using four approaches: protein-based, live-attenuated and chimeric vector, mRNA, and mAbs. Candidates in late-phase trials aim to protect young infants using mAbs, older infants and toddlers with live-attenuated vaccines, and children and adults using protein-based and mRNA vaccines. This Review provides an overview of RSV vaccines highlighting different target populations, antigens, and trial results. As RSV vaccines have not yet reached low-income and middle-income countries, we outline urgent next steps to minimise the vaccine delay., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JT and NIM received support for attending meetings or travel from the ResViNET Foundation. UMC Utrecht (LJB and NIM) received grants from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Dutch Lung Foundation, The Gates Medical Research Institute, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Janssen, MedImmune, MeMed, Merck, Novavax, Pfizer, and Sanofi; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, Ablynx, AstraZeneca, Bavaria Nordic, GSK, Janssen, MabXience, MedImmune, MEDtalks, Merck, Moderna, Novavax, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Virology Education. LJB is founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation. UJB was supported by the Division of Intramural Research of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH); and is named as an inventor on patents for live-attenuated RSV, with royalties paid to the National Institutes of Health by Sanofi Pasteur. ADC received grants from The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and WHO. CC received grants from Sanofi Pasteur, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Task Force for Global Health. RD received grants from Pfizer, Merck, MedImmune, and AstraZeneca; consulting fees from Pfizer, Merck and GSK; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Pfizer, Merck, Sanofi Pasteur, GSK, MedImmune, and AstraZeneca; and participated on a data safety monitoring boards or advisory boards for Pfizer, Merck, and GSK. BSG is named as an inventor on patents for RSV vaccines and mABS; received royalties from the NIH; and consulting fees from GSK, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi Pasteur, and Exevir. RAK received grants from the NIH and Sanofi Pasteur. YL received grants from GSK, Merck, and WHO; consulting fees from Pfizer and WHO; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Pfizer; and support for attending meetings or travel from Pfizer. AJP received grants from The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome, Cepi, the Medical Research Council, the NIH and Care Research, AstraZeneca, the European Commission, and the Serum Institute of India; royalties from AstraZeneca for the development of COVID-19 vaccines; consulting fees from Shionogi; is chair of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization of the Department of Health and Social Care; and has been member of the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization for WHO. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

The current understanding of the RSV-related mortality age distribution in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) relies on a limited number of disease incidence studies reporting wide age bands, and lacking specificity to Gavi-eligible countries. Understanding the age distribution of RSV-related deaths is crucial for the implementation of RSV interventions in LMICs that rely on support from Gavi. This study aims to provide the age profile of RSV mortality specifically in Gavi-eligible countries. Utilizing data from the RSV GOLD project, an ongoing global online mortality registry focusing on children under the age of 5 with laboratory-confirmed RSV infection, we employed two models (Complete Data Model and Prospective Data Model) to estimate the age profiles. To mitigate biases related to age group representation, we applied post-stratification weighting in our analysis. We included 423 pediatric deaths, including 145 from the community, under 2 years of age from 15 Gavi-eligible countries. Both models identified a peak age at 1 month and found that the majority of RSV-related mortality cases (59-77 %) from Gavi-eligible countries occur before 6 months of life. However, the models exhibited disparities in other age-related metrics. We present fitted age-at-time-of-death probability distributions to aid impact and cost-effectiveness studies. We expect that implementing infant RSV immunization strategies, such as maternal vaccination or infant immunoprophylaxis, will have high impact on RSV-related mortality in Gavi-eligible countries. The divergent results from the two models underscore the importance of carefully considering potential biases in retrospective and surveillance data when interpreting the age profile of RSV mortality cases in future research., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: LJB has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners. He has not received personal fees or other personal benefits. The University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMCU) has received major funding (>€100 000 per industrial partner) for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, Janssen, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Nutricia (Danone), and MeMed Diagnostics. UMCU has received major cash or in-kind funding as part of the public–private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU project from GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi. UMCU has received major funding by GlaxoSmithKline and Julius Clinical for participating in the INFORM study sponsored by MedImmune. UMCU has received minor funding for participation in trials by Regeneron and Janssen from 2015 to 2017 (total annual estimate <€20 000). UMCU received minor funding for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, Novavax, Pfizer, and Janssen (total annual estimate <€20 000). LJB. is the founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation. NIM has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners. She has not received personal fees or other personal benefits. Cheryl Cohen (C. C. has received minor funding from Sanofi and support to attend meetings from Parexel. Sandra Chaves (S. S. C.) has left the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and is currently working for Sanofi Pasteur, France. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Patient and public involvement in research refers to patients or caregivers with disease experience contributing to the design, conduct or dissemination of results from research. Patient and public involvement has given rise to new fields in healthcare-oriented research and has the potential to transform infectious diseases through interventional trials. Our recommendations and best practices from years of organizing respiratory syncytial virus parent networks are provided., Competing Interests: A.W.L. has previously worked in the pharmaceutical industry, but was not employed in industry while the manuscript was authored and submitted for publication. B.C. is an employee of a for-profit company, Chorus Innovations, Inc. Louis Bont has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners. He has not received personal fees or other personal benefits. Other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose, (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Breastfeeding provides important immunological benefits to the neonate, but how the different immunoactive components in breastmilk contribute to immunity remains poorly understood. Here, we characterized human breastmilk T cells using single-cell RNA-Seq and flow cytometry. Breastmilk contained predominantly memory T cells, with expression of immune signaling genes, high proliferation, and an effector Th1/cytotoxic profile with high cytokine production capacities. Elevated activation was balanced by an enriched Treg population and immune regulatory markers in conventional memory T cells. Gene and surface expression of tissue-residency markers indicate that breastmilk T cells represented tissue-adapted rather than circulatory T cells. In addition, breastmilk T cells had a broad homing profile and higher activation markers in these migratory subsets. The partly overlapping transcriptome profile between breastmilk and breast tissue T cells, particularly cytotoxic T cells, might support a role in local immune defense in the mammary gland. However, unique features of breastmilk, such as Tregs, might imply an additional role in neonatal immune support. We found some correlations between the breastmilk T cell profile and clinical parameters, most notably with maternal and household factors. Together, our data suggest that breastmilk contains an adapted T cell population that exerts their function in specific tissue sites.

Objectives: Children are generally considered main drivers of transmission for respiratory viruses, but the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 challenged this paradigm. Human rhinovirus (RV) continued to co-circulate throughout the pandemic, allowing for direct comparison of age-specific infectivity and susceptibility within households between these viruses during a time of low SARS-CoV-2 population immunity., Methods: Households with children were prospectively monitored for ≥23 weeks between August 2020 and July 2021. Upon onset of respiratory symptoms in a household, an outbreak study was initiated, including questionnaires and repeated nasal self-sampling in all household members. Swabs were tested by PCR. Age-stratified within-household secondary attack rates (SARs) were compared between SARS-CoV-2 and RV., Results: A total of 307 households participated, including 582 children and 627 adults. Overall, SAR was lower for SARS-CoV-2 than for RV (aOR 0.55) and age distributions differed between both viruses (p < 0.001). Following household exposure, children were significantly less likely to become infected with SARS-CoV-2 compared to RV (aOR 0.16), whereas this was opposite in adults (aOR 1.71)., Conclusion: In households, age-specific susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 and RV differs and drives differences in household transmission between these pathogens. This highlights the importance of characterizing age-specific transmission risks, particularly for emerging infections, to guide appropriate infection control interventions., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. Bont has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners. He has not received personal fees or other personal benefits. UMCU has received major funding (>€100,000 per industrial partner) for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD and MeMed Diagnostics. UMCU has received major funding for the RSV GOLD study from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. UMCU has received major funding as part of the public–private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU and PROMISE projects with partners GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Sanofi. UMCU has received major funding by Julius Clinical for participating in clinical studies sponsored by MedImmune and Pfizer. UMCU received minor funding (€1000–25,000 per industrial partner) for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, GSK, Novavax, Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, MSD, Sanofi, Janssen. Dr. Bont is the founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation. All other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The key correlate of protection of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is virus neutralization, measured via sera obtained through venipuncture. Dried blood obtained with a finger prick can simplify acquisition, processing, storage, and transport in trials and thereby reduce costs. In this study, we validate an assay to measure RSV neutralization in dried capillary blood., Methods: Functional antibodies were compared between matched serum and dried blood samples from a phase 1 trial with RSM01, an investigational anti-RSV prefusion F mAb. Hep-2 cells were infected with a serial dilution of sample-virus mixture by using RSV-A2-mKate to determine the half-maximal inhibitory concentration. Stability of dried blood was evaluated over time and during temperature stress., Results: Functional antibodies in dried blood were highly correlated with serum (R2 = 0.98, P < .0001). The precision of the assay for dried blood was similar to serum. The function of mAb remained stable for 9 months at room temperature and frozen dried blood samples., Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of measuring RSV neutralization using dried blood as a patient-centered solution that may replace serology testing in trials against RSV or other viruses, such as influenza and SARS-CoV-2. Clinical Trials Registration.  NCT05118386 (ClinicalTrials.gov)., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) has received major funding (>€100 000 per industrial partner) for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD, MeMed Diagnostics, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Bill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute, and the Dutch Lung Foundation. UMCU has received major funding as part of the public-private partnership Innovative Medicines Initiative–funded RESCEU and PROMISE projects with partners GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi. UMCU has received major funding by Julius Clinical for participating in clinical studies sponsored by MedImmune and Pfizer. UMCU received minor funding (€1000–€25 000 per industrial partner) for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, GSK, Novavax, Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca, MSD, Sanofi, and Janssen. L. J. B. and N. I. M. have regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners. They have not received personal fees or other personal benefits. L. J. B. is the founding chair of the ReSViNET Foundation. J. T. W. is an employee at the Bill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute. A. D.-C. and T. J. R. are supported by funding from the Intramural Research Program of the NIAID. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Down syndrome (DS) is characterized by lowered immune competence and premature aging. We previously showed decreased antibody response following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in adults with DS. IgG1 Fc glycosylation patterns are known to affect the effector function of IgG and are associated with aging. Here, we compare total and anti-spike (S) IgG1 glycosylation patterns following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in DS and healthy controls (HC). Total and anti-Spike IgG1 Fc N-glycan glycoprofiles were measured in non-exposed adults with DS and controls before and after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) of Fc glycopeptides. We recruited N = 44 patients and N = 40 controls. We confirmed IgG glycosylation patterns associated with aging in HC and showed premature aging in DS. In DS, we found decreased galactosylation (50.2% vs. 59.0%) and sialylation (6.7% vs. 8.5%) as well as increased fucosylation (97.0% vs. 94.6%) of total IgG. Both cohorts showed similar bisecting GlcNAc of total and anti-S IgG1 with age. In contrast, anti-S IgG1 of DS and HC showed highly comparable glycosylation profiles 28 days post vaccination. The IgG1 glycoprofile in DS exhibits strong premature aging. The combination of an early decrease in IgG1 Fc galactosylation and sialylation and increase in fucosylation is predicted to reduce complement activity and decrease FcγRIII binding and subsequent activation, respectively. The altered glycosylation patterns, combined with decreased antibody concentrations, help us understand the susceptibility to severe infections in DS. The effect of premature aging highlights the need for individuals with DS to receive tailored vaccines and/or vaccination schedules., (© 2024 The Authors. Aging Cell published by Anatomical Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The implementation of the approved respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) preventive interventions in immunisation programmes is advancing rapidly. Insight into healthcare costs of RSV-related paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions is lacking, but of great importance to evaluate the impact of implementation. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the total annual RSV-related paediatric intensive care healthcare costs in the Netherlands., Methods: A nationwide prospective, observational, multicenter study was performed from September 2021 until June 2023. The total annual RSV-related healthcare costs on PICUs in the Netherlands were calculated using RSV-related costs (subgroup I) and consequential costs (subgroup II and III). Subgroup I comprised all PICU admitted infants ≤12 months of age with laboratory-confirmed RSV infection. Subgroup II and III consisted of postponed elective PICU admissions and refused acute PICU admissions due to RSV-related lack of PICU capacity., Findings: A total of 424 infants with RSV-related PICU admission were included. Median age at PICU admission was 46 days (IQR 25-89). The median length of PICU admission was 5 days (IQR 3-8). The total RSV-related PICU costs are € 3,826,386 in 2021-2022, and € 3,183,888 in 2022-2023. Potential costs averted by RSV preventive interventions is € 1.9 to € 2.6 million depending on season, and the duration of protection., Interpretation: RSV-related PICU admissions cost €3.1 to €3.8 million in the Netherlands during one season. The introduction of new RSV preventive interventions into the Dutch immunisation programme will generate significant cost-savings on PICUs and decreases the admission burden of PICUs., Funding: None., Competing Interests: EP, CB, MH, MK, SM, AN, MR, RWA, JvW and GF have no competing interests to declare. LB has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners. He has not received personal fees or other personal benefits. UMCU has received major funding (>€100,000 per industrial partner) for investigator initiated studies from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD and MeMed Diagnostics. UMCU has received major funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. UMCU has received major funding as part of the public private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU and PROMISE projects with partners GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Sanofi. UMCU has received major funding by Julius Clinical for participating in clinical studies sponsored by AstraZeneca, Merck and Pfizer. UMCU received minor funding (€1000–25,000 per industrial partner) for consultation, DSMB membership or invited lectures by Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, GSK, Novavax, Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca, MSD, Sanofi, Janssen. LB is the founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation. JGW has been an investigator for clinical trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies including AstraZeneca, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Janssen and an investigator for clinical trials funded by IMI/Horizon2020 and ZonMw. All funds have been paid to the institution (UMCU). JGW participated in advisory boards of Janssen and Sanofi and was a speaker at a Sanofi sponsored symposium with fees paid to the institution (UMCU)., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in infants. Maternal RSV vaccination is a preventive strategy of great interest, as it could have a substantial impact on infant RSV disease burden. In recent years, the clinical development of maternal RSV vaccines has advanced rapidly., Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of maternal respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccination for preventing RSV disease in infants., Search Methods: We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register and two other trials registries on 21 October 2022. We updated the search on 27 July 2023, when we searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and two trials registries. Additionally, we searched the reference lists of retrieved studies and conference proceedings. There were no language restrictions on our searches., Selection Criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing maternal RSV vaccination with placebo or no intervention in pregnant women of any age. The primary outcomes were hospitalisation with clinically confirmed or laboratory-confirmed RSV disease in infants. The secondary outcomes covered adverse pregnancy outcomes (intrauterine growth restriction, stillbirth, and maternal death) and adverse infant outcomes (preterm birth, congenital abnormalities, and infant death)., Data Collection and Analysis: We used standard Cochrane methods and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach., Main Results: We included six RCTs (25 study reports) involving 17,991 pregnant women. The intervention was an RSV pre-F protein vaccine in four studies, and an RSV F protein nanoparticle vaccine in two studies. In all studies, the comparator was a placebo (saline, formulation buffer, or sterile water). We judged four studies at overall low risk of bias and two studies at overall high risk (mainly due to selection bias). All studies were funded by pharmaceutical companies. Maternal RSV vaccination compared with placebo reduces infant hospitalisation with laboratory-confirmed RSV disease (risk ratio (RR) 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31 to 0.82; 4 RCTs, 12,216 infants; high-certainty evidence). Based on an absolute risk with placebo of 22 hospitalisations per 1000 infants, our results represent 11 fewer hospitalisations per 1000 infants from vaccinated pregnant women (15 fewer to 4 fewer). No studies reported infant hospitalisation with clinically confirmed RSV disease. Maternal RSV vaccination compared with placebo has little or no effect on the risk of congenital abnormalities (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.04; 140 per 1000 with placebo, 5 fewer per 1000 with RSV vaccination (17 fewer to 6 more); 4 RCTs, 12,304 infants; high-certainty evidence). Maternal RSV vaccination likely has little or no effect on the risk of intrauterine growth restriction (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.33; 3 per 1000 with placebo, 1 more per 1000 with RSV vaccination (1 fewer to 4 more); 4 RCTs, 12,545 pregnant women; moderate-certainty evidence). Maternal RSV vaccination may have little or no effect on the risk of stillbirth (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.72; 3 per 1000 with placebo, no difference with RSV vaccination (2 fewer to 3 more); 5 RCTs, 12,652 pregnant women). There may be a safety signal warranting further investigation related to preterm birth. This outcome may be more likely with maternal RSV vaccination, although the 95% CI includes no effect, and the evidence is very uncertain (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.36; 6 RCTs, 17,560 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Based on an absolute risk of 51 preterm births per 1000 infants from pregnant women who received placebo, there may be 8 more per 1000 infants from pregnant women with RSV vaccination (1 fewer to 18 more). There was one maternal death in the RSV vaccination group and none in the placebo group. Our meta-analysis suggests that RSV vaccination compared with placebo may have little or no effect on the risk of maternal death (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.12 to 73.50; 3 RCTs, 7977 pregnant women; low-certainty evidence). The effect of maternal RSV vaccination on the risk of infant death is very uncertain (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.81; 6 RCTs, 17,589 infants; very low-certainty evidence)., Authors' Conclusions: The findings of this review suggest that maternal RSV vaccination reduces laboratory-confirmed RSV hospitalisations in infants. There are no safety concerns about intrauterine growth restriction and congenital abnormalities. We must be careful in drawing conclusions about other safety outcomes owing to the low and very low certainty of the evidence. The evidence available to date suggests RSV vaccination may have little or no effect on stillbirth, maternal death, and infant death (although the evidence for infant death is very uncertain). However, there may be a safety signal warranting further investigation related to preterm birth. This is driven by data from one trial, which is not fully published yet. The evidence base would be much improved by more RCTs with substantial sample sizes and well-designed observational studies with long-term follow-up for assessment of safety outcomes. Future studies should aim to use standard outcome measures, collect data on concomitant vaccines, and stratify data by timing of vaccination, gestational age at birth, race, and geographical setting., (Copyright © 2024 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of acute lower respiratory tract infection in young children and the second leading cause of infant death worldwide. While global circulation has been extensively studied for respiratory viruses such as seasonal influenza, and more recently also in great detail for SARS-CoV-2, a lack of global multi-annual sampling of complete RSV genomes limits our understanding of RSV molecular epidemiology. Here, we capitalise on the genomic surveillance by the INFORM-RSV study and apply phylodynamic approaches to uncover how selection and neutral epidemiological processes shape RSV diversity. Using complete viral genome sequences, we show similar patterns of site-specific diversifying selection among RSVA and RSVB and recover the imprint of non-neutral epidemic processes on their genealogies. Using a phylogeographic approach, we provide evidence for air travel governing the global patterns of RSVA and RSVB spread, which results in a considerable degree of phylogenetic mixing across countries. Our findings highlight the potential of systematic global RSV genomic surveillance for transforming our understanding of global RSV spread., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

A novel host-protein score (called MMBV) helps to distinguish bacterial from viral infection by combining the blood concentrations of three biomarkers: tumour necrosis factor related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL), interferon gamma induced protein 10 (IP-10), and C-reactive protein (CRP). These host biomarkers are differentially expressed in response to bacterial versus viral acute infection. We conducted a prospective study, with a time series design, in healthy adult volunteers in the Netherlands. The aim was to determine the variability of TRAIL, IP-10, and CRP and the MMBV score in healthy adults across time. Up to six blood samples were taken from each healthy volunteer over a period of up to four weeks. In 77 healthy participants without recent or current symptoms, MMBV scores (maximal) were bacterial in 1.3 % and viral (or other non-infectious etiology) in 93.5 % of participants. There was little variation in the mean concentrations of TRAIL (74.5 pg/ml), IP-10 (113.6 pg/ml), and CRP (1.90 mg/L) as well as the MMBV score. The variability of biomarker measurement was comparable to the precision of the measurement platform for TRAIL, IP-10, and CRP. Our findings establish the mean values of these biomarkers and MMBV in healthy individuals and indicate little variability between and within individuals over time, supporting the potential utility of this novel diagnostic to detect infection-induced changes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: With interventions to prevent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection within reach, this review aims to provide healthcare professionals with the latest information necessary to inform parents and assess the potential impact of RSV prevention on everyday practice. We address frequently asked questions for parental counseling., Recent Findings: Numerous studies emphasize the major burden of RSV on young children, parents, healthcare and society. In the first year of life, about 14% of healthy term infants visit a doctor and 2% require hospitalization due to RSV. In older children (1--5 years), RSV infections and associated morbidity (wheeze, acute otitis media) are major drivers of outpatient visits. A novel maternal RSV vaccine and long-acting mAb can provide protection during infants' first months of life. This maternal vaccine showed 70.9% efficacy against severe RSV infection within 150 days after birth; the mAb nirsevimab reduces medically attended RSV infections by 79.5% within 150 days after administration. Both gained regulatory approval in the USA (FDA) and Europe (EMA)., Summary: Novel RSV immunizations hold promise to reduce the RSV burden in infants, with substantial impact on everyday practice. Tailored parental guidance will be instrumental for successful implementation. Awaiting pediatric vaccines, RSV infections beyond infancy will still pose a significant outpatient burden., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Infants and young children born prematurely are at high risk of severe acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI) caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). In this study, we aimed to assess the global disease burden of and risk factors for RSV-associated ALRI in infants and young children born before 37 weeks of gestation., Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregated data from studies published between Jan 1, 1995, and Dec 31, 2021, identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and Global Health, and individual participant data shared by the Respiratory Virus Global Epidemiology Network on respiratory infectious diseases. We estimated RSV-associated ALRI incidence in community, hospital admission, in-hospital mortality, and overall mortality among children younger than 2 years born prematurely. We conducted two-stage random-effects meta-regression analyses accounting for chronological age groups, gestational age bands (early preterm, <32 weeks gestational age [wGA], and late preterm, 32 to <37 wGA), and changes over 5-year intervals from 2000 to 2019. Using individual participant data, we assessed perinatal, sociodemographic, and household factors, and underlying medical conditions for RSV-associated ALRI incidence, hospital admission, and three severity outcome groups (longer hospital stay [>4 days], use of supplemental oxygen and mechanical ventilation, or intensive care unit admission) by estimating pooled odds ratios (ORs) through a two-stage meta-analysis (multivariate logistic regression and random-effects meta-analysis). This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021269742., Findings: We included 47 studies from the literature and 17 studies with individual participant-level data contributed by the participating investigators. We estimated that, in 2019, 1 650 000 (95% uncertainty range [UR] 1 350 000-1 990 000) RSV-associated ALRI episodes, 533 000 (385 000-730 000) RSV-associated hospital admissions, 3050 (1080-8620) RSV-associated in-hospital deaths, and 26 760 (11 190-46 240) RSV-attributable deaths occurred in preterm infants worldwide. Among early preterm infants, the RSV-associated ALRI incidence rate and hospitalisation rate were significantly higher (rate ratio [RR] ranging from 1·69 to 3·87 across different age groups and outcomes) than for all infants born at any gestational age. In the second year of life, early preterm infants and young children had a similar incidence rate but still a significantly higher hospitalisation rate (RR 2·26 [95% UR 1·27-3·98]) compared with all infants and young children. Although late preterm infants had RSV-associated ALRI incidence rates similar to that of all infants younger than 1 year, they had higher RSV-associated ALRI hospitalisation rate in the first 6 months (RR 1·93 [1·11-3·26]). Overall, preterm infants accounted for 25% (95% UR 16-37) of RSV-associated ALRI hospitalisations in all infants of any gestational age. RSV-associated ALRI in-hospital case fatality ratio in preterm infants was similar to all infants. The factors identified to be associated with RSV-associated ALRI incidence were mainly perinatal and sociodemographic characteristics, and factors associated with severe outcomes from infection were mainly underlying medical conditions including congenital heart disease, tracheostomy, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, chronic lung disease, or Down syndrome (with ORs ranging from 1·40 to 4·23)., Interpretation: Preterm infants face a disproportionately high burden of RSV-associated disease, accounting for 25% of RSV hospitalisation burden. Early preterm infants have a substantial RSV hospitalisation burden persisting into the second year of life. Preventive products for RSV can have a substantial public health impact by preventing RSV-associated ALRI and severe outcomes from infection in preterm infants., Funding: EU Innovative Medicines Initiative Respiratory Syncytial Virus Consortium in Europe., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests YM and ES were affiliated with the University of Edinburgh when this work was conducted. YM is currently affiliated to the School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China and ES is employed by University College Hospital, University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. XW reports grants from GSK to their institution and personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. YL reports grants from Wellcome Trust, WHO, and GSK paid to their institution, and personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. TS reports grants from Royal Society of Edinburgh outside the submitted work. LJB reports regular interactions with AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, GSK, Novavax, Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, MSD, Sanofi, Genzyme, MeMed Diagnostics, and Janssen but has not received personal fees or other personal benefits; being the founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation; their affiliation (University Medical Centre Utrecht) has received major funding (>€100 000 per industrial partner) for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD, and MeMed Diagnostics; major funding for the RSV GOLD study from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; major funding as part of the public private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU and PROMISE projects with partners GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi; major funding by Julius Clinical for participating in clinical studies sponsored by MedImmune and Pfizer; and minor funding (€1000–€25 000 per industrial partner) for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, GSK, Novavax, Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, MSD, Sanofi, and Janssen. HYC reports consulting for Ellume, Pfizer, and the Gates Foundation; serving on advisory boards for Vir, Merck, and AbbVie; conducting continuing medical education teaching with Medscape, Vindico, Cataylst CME, and Clinical Care Options; research funding from Gates Ventures; and receiving support and reagents from Ellume and Cepheid, all outside of the submitted work. HJZ reports grants from the Gates Foundation, AstraZeneca, MSD, and Pfizer paid to their institution outside the submitted work, and serving on advisory boards for MSD. TH reports personal fees from Janssen, Sanofi, Enanta, MSD, and Moderna, all outside of the submitted work. MHJ reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, OM-Pharma, Chiesi, GSK, and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. MCN reports grants from the Gates Foundation, European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Sanofi; and serving on advisory boards for Sanofi, all outside the submitted work. BR received honoraria due to lectures from AbbVie, Germania, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Milupa, Nestle, and Fresenius, outside the submitted work; and travel support from AbbVie, Chiesi, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, and Nestle. HN reports grants from the Innovative Medicines Initiative related to the submitted work; grants from WHO, the National Institute for Health Research, Pfizer, and Icosavax; and personal fees from the Gates Foundation, Pfizer, ReViral, GSK, Merck, Icosavax, Sanofi, Novavax, and AbbVie, outside the submitted work. CFY reports grants from National Medical Research Council Singapore and Wellcome Trust, and funding to attend conferences and honorarium from Sanofi, Pfizer, and Takeda, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: During the first year of life, 1 in 4 infants develops a symptomatic respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection, yet only half seek medical attention. The current focus on medically attended RSV therefore underrepresents the true societal burden of RSV. We assessed the burden of nonmedically attended RSV infections and compared with medically attended RSV., Methods: We performed active RSV surveillance until the age of 1 year in a cohort (n = 993) nested within the Respiratory Syncytial Virus Consortium in EUrope (RESCEU) prospective birth cohort study enrolling healthy term-born infants in 5 European countries. Symptoms, medication use, wheezing, and impact on family life were analyzed., Results: For 97 of 120 (80.1%) nonmedically attended RSV episodes, sufficient data were available for analysis. In 50.5% (49/97), symptoms lasted ≥15 days. Parents reported impairment in usual daily activities in 59.8% (58/97) of episodes; worries, 75.3% (73/97); anxiety, 34.0% (33/97); and work absenteeism, 10.8% (10/93). Compared with medically attended RSV (n = 102, 9 hospital admissions), Respiratory Syncytial Virus NETwork (ReSViNET) severity scores were lower (3.5 vs 4.6, P < .001), whereas duration of respiratory symptoms and was comparable., Conclusions: Even when medical attendance is not required, RSV infection poses a substantial burden to infants, families, and society. These findings are important for policy makers when considering the implementation of RSV immunization. Clinical Trials Registration. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03627572)., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. M. A. v. H. has received honoraria for participation in advisory boards from Sanofi and Moderna and acted as a principal investigator in randomized clinical trials for Pfizer. T. H. has received honoraria for lectures or participation in advisory boards or data monitoring committees from Janssen, Sanofi, and MSD. A. J. P. is part of RESCEU (Respiratory Syncytial Virus Consortium in Europe), and his university received grant funding from the European Commission’s Innovative Medicines Initiative for this work. Oxford University has received grant funding from the Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Serum Institute of India, and AstraZeneca. A. J. P. is a contributor to intellectual property licensed by Oxford University Innovation to AstraZeneca. A. J. P. is chair of the UK Joint Committtee of Vaccination and Immunisation and was a member of the World Health Organization’s Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization until 2022. S. C. provided clinical study advice or acted as principal investigator for GSK, Pfizer, MedImmune, Ablynx, Gilead, Ark Biosciences, Shionogi, and Janssen/Alios, with fees paid to the University of Edinburgh. F. M.-T. has received honoraria from GSK, Biofabri, Pfizer Inc, Sanofi Pasteur, MSD, Seqirus, and Janssen for taking part in advisory boards and expert meetings and for acting as a speaker in congresses outside the scope of the submitted work. F. M.-T. has also acted as principal investigator in randomized controlled trials of the aforementioned companies as well as Ablynx, Gilead, Regeneron, Roche, Abbott, Novavax, and MedImmune, with honoraria paid to his institution. A. D.-U. has been a subinvestigator for clinical trials sponsored by Pfizer and GSK and observational studies sponsored by Sanofi, with all funds paid to her institution. A. D.-U. has received funding for attending the Asociación Española Pediatría (Pediatric Spanish Association) meeting in 2022. L. J. B. has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners. He has not received personal fees or other personal benefits. University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) has received major funding (>€100 000 per industrial partner) for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD, and MeMed Diagnostics. UMCU has received major funding for the RSV GOLD study from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. UMCU has received major funding as part of the public-private RESCEU and PROMISE projects, funded by the Innovative Medicines Initiative, in partnership with GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi. UMCU has received major funding from Julius Clinical for participating in clinical studies sponsored by MedImmune and Pfizer. UMCU received minor funding (€1000–€25 000 per industrial partner) for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, GSK, Novavax, Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, MSD, Sanofi, Genzyme, and Janssen. L. J. B. is the founding chair of the ReSViNET Foundation. J. G. W. has been an investigator for clinical trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies, including AstraZeneca, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Janssen, with all funds paid to UMCU. J. G. W participated in the advisory board of Janssen and Sanofi, with fees paid to UMCU. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is the primary cause of lower respiratory tract infections in children <5 years of age. Monocytes, especially in the respiratory tract, are suggested to contribute to RSV pathology, but their role is incompletely understood. With transcriptomic profiling of blood and airway monocytes, we describe the role of monocytes in severe RSV infection., Methods: Tracheobronchial aspirates and blood samples were collected from control patients (n = 9) and those infected with RSV (n = 14) who were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. Monocytes (CD14+) were sorted and analyzed by RNA sequencing for transcriptomic profiling., Results: Peripheral blood and airway monocytes of patients with RSV demonstrated increased expression of antiviral and interferon-responsive genes as compared with controls. Cytokine signaling showed a shared response between blood and airway monocytes while displaying responses that were more pronounced according to the tissue of origin. Airway monocytes upregulated additional genes related to migration and inflammation., Conclusions: We found that the RSV-induced interferon response extends from the airways to the peripheral blood. Moreover, RSV induces a migration-promoting transcriptional program in monocytes. Unraveling the monocytic response and its role in the immune response to RSV infection could help the development of therapeutics to prevent severe disease., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. L. J. B. has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners. He has not received personal fees or other personal benefits. The University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) has received major funding (>€100 000 per industrial partner) for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD, and MeMed Diagnostics. UMCU has received major funding for the RSV GOLD study from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. UMCU has received major funding as part of the public-private partnership Innovative Medicines Initiative–funded RESCEU and PROMISE projects with partners GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi. UMCU has received major funding by Julius Clinical for participating in clinical studies sponsored by MedImmune and Pfizer. UMCU received minor funding (€1000–25 000 per industrial partner) for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, GSK, Novavax, Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, MSD, Sanofi, and Janssen. L. J. B. is the founding chair of the ReSViNET Foundation. J. G. W. has been an investigator for clinical trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies, including AstraZeneca, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Janssen. All funds have been paid to UMCU. J. G. W. participated in the advisory board of Janssen and Sanofi with fees paid to UMCU. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Currently, there are no available tools to identify infants at the highest risk of significant morbidity and mortality from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) who would benefit most from RSV prevention products. The objective was to develop and internally validate a personalized risk prediction tool for use among all newborns that uses readily available birth/postnatal data to predict RSV LRTI requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission., Methods: We conducted a population-based birth cohort study of infants born from 1995 to 2007, insured by the Tennessee Medicaid Program, and who did not receive RSV immunoprophylaxis during the first year of life. The primary outcome was severe RSV LRTI requiring ICU admission during the first year of life. We built a multivariable logistic regression model including demographic and clinical variables available at or shortly after birth to predict the primary outcome., Results: In a population-based sample of 429 365 infants, 713 (0.2%) had severe RSV LRTI requiring ICU admission. The median age of admission was 66 days (interquartile range, 37-120). Our tool, including 19 variables, demonstrated good predictive accuracy (area under the curve, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.80) and identified infants who did not qualify for palivizumab, based on American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines, but had higher predicted risk levels than infants who qualified (27% of noneligible infants with >0.16% predicted probabilities [lower quartile for eligible infants])., Conclusions: We developed a personalized tool that identified infants at increased risk for severe RSV LRTI requiring ICU admission, expected to benefit most from immunoprophylaxis., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. T.V.H. serves on vaccine DSMBs for Pfizer and has served as a consultant to Sanofi. L.J.B. has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners. He has not received personal fees or other personal benefits. University Medical Centre Utrecht has received major funding (>€100 000 per industrial partner) for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD, and MeMed Diagnostics; has received major funding for the RSV GOLD study from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; has received major funding as part of the public private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU and PROMISE projects with partners GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi; has received major funding by Julius Clinical for participating in clinical studies sponsored by MedImmune and Pfizer; and has received minor funding (€1000-25 000 per industrial partner) for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, GSK, Novavax, Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca, MSD, Sanofi, and Janssen. L.J.B. is the founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation. All other authors (B.M.S., N.B.A., T.G., P.W., E.F.M., G.E.) report no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

The European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration have recently approved a maternal vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus. The US Food and Drug Administration limits vaccination to later in pregnancy. Mathematical modeling demonstrates that this vaccination window may reduce the global mortality impact of the vaccine by 12%. Policymakers should carefully consider vaccine risks and benefits to safeguard vulnerable infants effectively., Competing Interests: L.J.B. has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners. He has not received personal fees or other personal benefits. UMCU has received major funding (>€100,000 per industrial partner) for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD and MeMed Diagnostics. UMCU has received major funding for the RSV GOLD study from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. UMCU has received major funding as part of the public-private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU and PROMISE projects with partners GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Sanofi. UMCU has received major funding by Julius Clinical for participating in clinical studies sponsored by MedImmune and Pfizer. UMCU received minor funding (€1,000–25,000 per industrial partner) for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, GSK, Novavax, Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, MSD, Sanofi, Janssen. L.J.B. is the founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation. Since April 1, 2021, Louis has been given a new position as medical scientific division manager of the Children’s Division of the Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital in Utrecht. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Mucosal administration of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against respiratory pathogens is a promising alternative for systemic administration because lower doses are required for protection. Clinical development of mucosal mAbs is a highly active field yet clinical proof-of-concept is lacking., Methods: In this investigator-initiated, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial, we evaluated intranasal palivizumab for the prevention of RSV infection in preterm infants (Dutch Trial Register NTR7378 and NTR7403). We randomized infants 1:1 to receive intranasal palivizumab (1 mg/mL) or placebo once daily during the RSV season. Any RSV infection was the primary outcome and RSV hospitalization was the key secondary outcome. The primary outcome was analyzed with a mixed effect logistic regression on the modified intention-to-treat population., Findings: We recruited 268 infants between Jan 14, 2019 and Jan 28, 2021, after which the trial was stopped for futility following the planned interim analysis. Adverse events were similar in both groups (22/134 (16.4%) palivizumab arm versus 26/134 (19.4%) placebo arm). There were 6 dropouts and 168 infants were excluded from the efficacy analyses due to absent RSV circulation during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Any RSV infection was similar in infants in both groups (18/47 (38.3%) palivizumab arm versus 11/47 (23.4%) placebo arm; aOR 2.2, 95% CI 0.7-6.5)., Interpretation: Daily intranasal palivizumab did not prevent RSV infection in late preterm infants. Our findings have important implications for the clinical development of mucosal mAbs, namely the necessity of timely interim analyses and further research to understand mucosal antibody half-life., Funding: Funded by the Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands., Competing Interests: UMCU has received major funding (>€100,000 per industrial partner) for investigator initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD and MeMed Diagnostics. UMCU has received major funding for from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Gates Medical Research Institute and the Dutch Lung Foundation. UMCU has received major funding as part of the public private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU and PROMISE projects with partners GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Sanofi. UMCU has received major funding by Julius Clinical for participating in clinical studies sponsored by MedImmune and Pfizer. UMCU received minor funding (€1000–25,000 per industrial partner) for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, GSK, Novavax, Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca, MSD, Sanofi, Janssen. LJB and NIM have regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners. They have not received personal fees or other personal benefits. LJB is the founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation. Narsyn study group Elisabeth E. Nibbelke MSc1, Brigitte Buiteman, Neele Rave MSc1, Marlies Vermaas-van Putten MD2, Elly A. Smit-Kleinlugtenbeld MD3, Jacqueline P. de Lege-Korstanje Msc3, Marieke G. Peetsold MD PhD4, Anthon Hulsmann MD PhD5, Sandy van Gool MD PhD6, Yvonne Snepvangers MD PhD7, Max Colombijn MD PhD7, Negassi Menelik MD8, Stephanie de Crom MD PhD9, Ben Semmekrot MD PhD10, Wouter J. de Waal MD PhD11, Eline Okhuijsen MD11, Gavin W. ten Tusscher MD PhD12, Ronald A. de Moor MD13, Mijke A. Breukels MD PhD14, Claire Lutterman MD15, Gerdien A. Tramper-Stranders MD PhD16, Johanna H. Oudshoorn MD PhD17, Astrid Ritman17, Jeannette S. von Lindern MD PhD18, Gerdina H. Dubbink-Verheij MD PhD18, Maartje M. van den Berg MD PhD19, Marlon E.F. Wilsterman MD20, Edwin Rietveld MD PhD21, Willemijn van Heel MD22, Anne M. de Grauw MD22, Femke Croes MD23, Rienus A. Doedens MD24, Lonneke van Onzenoort-Bokken MD PhD25, Clemens B. Meijssen MD26, Machteld van Scherpenzeel-de Vries MD27, Petra Hoekstra MD27, Linda G.M. van Rooij MD PhD28, Willem-Pieter de Boode MD PhD29, Maaike C. van Rossem MD30, Petra Sipkema MSc30, Monique A.M. Jacobs MD31, Marianne A. van Houten MD PhD32, Indrani Kok-Wijesinha MD33, Arine M. Vlieger MD PhD34, Walter Balemans MD PhD34, Frans B. Plötz MD PhD35, Naomi Reijmerink MD PhD36, Stefan M. van Dorth MD37, Willem Heikens MD37, Anke G. Kuijpers38, Christel Geesing MD38, Bas J.P. Delsing MD39, Mieke Aldenhoven MD PhD40, Karoly Illy MD40, Eric Hack40, Floris Groenendaal MD PhD41, Nicole Derksen42, Katrien Oude Rengerink PhD43, Jan Meeldijk44, Lysette Ebskamp- van Raaij45, Jolanda D.F. de Groot-Mijnes46 PhD, Rob Schuurman PhD46. Affiliations 1Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands 2Pediatric Department, Admiraal de Ruyter Ziekenhuis, Goes, the Netherlands 3Pediatric Department, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, the Netherlands 4Pediatric Department, Alrijne Ziekenhuis, Leiderdorp, the Netherlands 5Pediatric Department, Amphia Ziekenhuis, Breda, the Netherlands 6Pediatric Department, Antonius Ziekenhuis, Sneek, the Netherlands 7Pediatric Department, Beatrix Ziekenhuis, Gorinchem, the Netherlands 8Pediatric Department, BovenIJ Ziekenhuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 9Pediatric Department, Bravis Ziekenhuis, Roosendaal, the Netherlands 10Pediatric Department, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, the Netherlands 11Pediatric Department, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands 12Pediatric Department, Dijklander Ziekenhuis, Hoorn, the Netherlands 13Pediatric Department, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands 14Pediatric Department, Elkerliek Ziekenhuis, Helmond, the Netherlands 15Pediatric Department, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, the Netherlands 16Pediatric Department, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands 17Pediatric Department, Gelre Ziekenhuis, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands 18Pediatric Department, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, the Netherlands 19Pediatric Department, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum, Den Haag, the Netherlands 20Pediatric Department, Nij Smellinghe Ziekenhuis, Drachten, the Netherlands 21Pediatric Department, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands 22Pediatric Department, Juliana Children’s Hospital, Den Haag, the Netherlands 23Pediatric Department, LangeLand Ziekenhuis, Zoetermeer, the Netherlands 24Pediatric Department, Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, the Netherlands 25Pediatric Department, Máxima Medisch Centrum, Veldhoven, the Netherlands 26Pediatric Department, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, the Netherlands 27Pediatric Department, Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands 28Pediatric Department, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands 29Pediatric Department, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands 30Pediatric Department, Rijnstate, Arnhem, the Netherlands 31Pediatric Department, Slingeland Ziekenhuis, Doetinchem, the Netherlands 32Pediatric Department, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands 33Pediatric Department, St. Anna Ziekenhuis, Geldrop, the Netherlands 34Pediatric Department, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein & Utrecht, the Netherlands 35Pediatric Department, Tergooi Ziekenhuis, Hilversum, the Netherlands 36Pediatric Department, Ziekenhuis St. Jansdal, Harderwijk, the Netherlands 37Pediatric Department, Ziekenhuis Tjongerschans, Heerenveen, the Netherlands 38Pediatric Department, Ziekenhuis Bernhoven, Uden, the Netherlands 39Pediatric Department, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands 40Pediatric Department, Ziekenhuis Rivierenland, Tiel, the Netherlands 41Neonatology Department, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands 42RSV Independent Patient Advisory Board 43Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Section Biostatistics and Research Support, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands 44Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands 45Utrecht Center for Diagnostic Advances in Immunology Research (UDAIR), University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands 46Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands, (© 2023 The Authors.)

The large global burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) respiratory tract infections in young children and older adults has gained increased recognition in recent years. Recent discoveries regarding the neutralization-specific viral epitopes of the pre-fusion RSV glycoprotein have led to a shift from empirical to structure-based design of RSV therapeutics, and controlled human infection model studies have provided early-stage proof of concept for novel RSV monoclonal antibodies, vaccines and antiviral drugs. The world's first vaccines and first monoclonal antibody to prevent RSV among older adults and all infants, respectively, have recently been approved. Large-scale introduction of RSV prophylactics emphasizes the need for active surveillance to understand the global impact of these interventions over time and to timely identify viral mutants that are able to escape novel prophylactics. In this Review, we provide an overview of RSV interventions in clinical development, highlighting global disease burden, seasonality, pathogenesis, and host and viral factors related to RSV immunity., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

Competing Interests: LJB has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners but has not received personal fees or other personal benefits, and is the founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation. JGW has been an investigator for clinical trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies including AstraZeneca, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Janssen with all funds paid to University Medical Center Utrecht, and has participated in the advisory boards of Janssen and Sanofi with fees paid to UMCU.

Background: Millions of children are hospitalised due to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection every year. Treatment is supportive, and current therapies (e.g. inhaled bronchodilators, epinephrine, nebulised hypertonic saline, and corticosteroids) are ineffective or have limited effect. Respiratory syncytial virus immunoglobulin may be used prophylactically to prevent hospital admission from RSV-related illness. It may be considered for the treatment of established severe RSV infection or for treatment in an immunocompromised host, although it is not licensed for this purpose. It is unclear whether immunoglobulins improve outcomes when used as a treatment for established RSV infection in infants and young children admitted to hospital. This is an update of a review first published in 2019., Objectives: To assess the effects of immunoglobulins for the treatment of RSV-proven lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in children aged up to three years, admitted to hospital., Search Methods: For this 2022 update, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Specialised Register, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science (from inception to 2 December 2022) with no restrictions. We searched two trial registries for ongoing trials (to 2 December 2022) and checked the reference lists of reviews and included articles for additional studies., Selection Criteria: Randomised controlled trials comparing immunoglobulins with placebo in hospitalised infants and children aged up to three years with laboratory-diagnosed RSV lower respiratory tract infection., Data Collection and Analysis: Two review authors independently selected trials, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data. We assessed evidence certainty using GRADE., Main Results: In total, we included eight trials involving 906 infants and children aged up to three years. We included one new trial in this update. The immunoglobulin preparations used in these trials included anti-RSV immunoglobulin and the monoclonal antibody preparations palivizumab and motavizumab. Five trials were conducted at single or multiple sites within a single high-income country (four in the USA, one in Qatar). Three trials included study sites in different countries. All three of these trials included study sites in one or more high-income countries (USA, Chile, New Zealand, Australia, Qatar), with two trials also including a study site in a middle-income country (Panama). Five of the eight trials were "supported" or "sponsored" by the trial drug manufacturers. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of immunoglobulins on mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 5.27; 4 studies, 309 participants). There were four deaths - two amongst 98 children receiving immunoglobulins, and two amongst 98 children receiving placebo. One additional death occurred in a fourth trial, however the study group of the child was not known and the data were not included in the analysis (very low-certainty evidence). The use of immunoglobulins in infants and children admitted to hospital with RSV proven LRTI probably results in little to no difference in the length of hospitalisation (mean difference (MD) -0.13 days, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.12; 6 studies, 737 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Immunoglobulins may result in little to no difference in the number of children who experience one or more adverse events of any severity or seriousness compared to placebo (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.78; 5 studies, 340 participants; low-certainty evidence) or the number of children who experience one or more adverse events judged by study investigators to be serious in nature, compared to placebo (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.79; 4 studies, 238 participants; low-certainty evidence). Certainty of evidence for secondary outcomes was low. This evidence suggests that use of immunoglobulins results in little to no difference in the need for, or duration of, mechanical ventilation and the need for, or duration of, supplemental oxygen. The use of immunoglobulins does not reduce the need for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and when children are admitted to the ICU results in little to no difference in the duration of ICU stay., Authors' Conclusions: We are very uncertain about the effect of immunoglobulins on mortality. We are moderately certain that use of immunoglobulins in hospitalised infants and children may result in little to no difference in the length of hospitalisation. Immunoglobulins may result in little to no difference in adverse events, the need for or duration of mechanical ventilation, supplemental oxygen, or admission to the intensive care unit, though we are less certain about this evidence and the true effect of immunoglobulins on these outcomes may differ markedly from the estimated effect observed in this review. All trials were conducted in high-income countries, and data from populations in which the rate of death from RSV infection is higher are lacking., (Copyright © 2023 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of childhood mortality in infants below 6 months of age. In low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), the public health burden is substantial and resources are limited. It is critical to inform decision makers about effectiveness of new interventions., Methods: We developed a mathematical model where individual RSV subtype A (RSV-A) and B (RSV-B) maternally derived neutralizing titers were predicted at time of birth after maternal vaccination with the RSV prefusion F protein-based vaccine. We estimated the subsequent duration of vaccine-induced immunity and compared this to the age at time of death distribution in the RSV GOLD Mortality Database to predict the potential impact of maternal vaccination on RSV-related childhood mortality. We used country-specific timing of antenatal care visits distributions and mortality estimates to make country-specific predictions for number of cases averted., Findings: The model predicts that on average a neonate born at 40 weeks gestational age will be protected between 6 and 7 months from RSV-A and approximately 5 months from RSV-B related mortality. We estimated the potential impact of RSV-related mortality for in-hospital and out-of-hospital cases in LMICs and predicted that in 51 GAVI-eligible countries maternal vaccination could avert between 55% and 63% of the RSV-related in-hospital mortality cases below 6 months of age., Interpretation: We show that maternal vaccination could substantially decrease RSV-A and RSV-B related in-hospital and out-of-hospital mortality in LMICs in the first 6 months of life., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: LB has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners. He has not received personal fees or other personal benefits. UMCU has received major funding (>€100,000 per industrial partner) for investigator initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD, and MeMed Diagnostics. UMCU has received major funding for the RSV GOLD study from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. UMCU has received major funding as part of the public private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU and PROMISE projects with partners GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi. UMCU has received major funding by Julius Clinical for participating in clinical studies sponsored by MedImmune and Pfizer. UMCU received minor funding (€1,000–25,000 per industrial partner) for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, GSK, Novavax, Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca, MSD, Sanofi, Genzyme, Janssen. Dr. Bont is the founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation. Since April 1st 2021, LB has been given a new position as medical scientific division manager of the Children's Division of the Wilhelmina Children's Hospital in Utrecht., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Background: Nirsevimab is an extended half-life monoclonal antibody to the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) fusion protein that has been developed to protect infants for an entire RSV season. Previous studies have shown that the nirsevimab binding site is highly conserved. However, investigations of the geotemporal evolution of potential escape variants in recent (ie, 2015-2021) RSV seasons have been minimal. Here, we examine prospective RSV surveillance data to assess the geotemporal prevalence of RSV A and B, and functionally characterise the effect of the nirsevimab binding-site substitutions identified between 2015 and 2021., Methods: We assessed the geotemporal prevalence of RSV A and B and nirsevimab binding-site conservation between 2015 and 2021 from three prospective RSV molecular surveillance studies (the US-based OUTSMART-RSV, the global INFORM-RSV, and a pilot study in South Africa). Nirsevimab binding-site substitutions were assessed in an RSV microneutralisation susceptibility assay. We contextualised our findings by assessing fusion-protein sequence diversity from 1956 to 2021 relative to other respiratory-virus envelope glycoproteins using RSV fusion protein sequences published in NCBI GenBank., Findings: We identified 5675 RSV A and RSV B fusion protein sequences (2875 RSV A and 2800 RSV B) from the three surveillance studies (2015-2021). Nearly all (25 [100%] of 25 positions of RSV A fusion proteins and 22 [88%] of 25 positions of RSV B fusion proteins) amino acids within the nirsevimab binding site remained highly conserved between 2015 and 2021. A highly prevalent (ie, >40·0% of all sequences) nirsevimab binding-site Ile206Met:Gln209Arg RSV B polymorphism arose between 2016 and 2021. Nirsevimab neutralised a diverse set of recombinant RSV viruses, including new variants containing binding-site substitutions. RSV B variants with reduced susceptibility to nirsevimab neutralisation were detected at low frequencies (ie, prevalence <1·0%) between 2015 and 2021. We used 3626 RSV fusion-protein sequences published in NCBI GenBank between 1956 and 2021 (2024 RSV and 1602 RSV B) to show that the RSV fusion protein had lower genetic diversity than influenza haemagglutinin and SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins., Interpretation: The nirsevimab binding site was highly conserved between 1956 and 2021. Nirsevimab escape variants were rare and have not increased over time., Funding: AstraZeneca and Sanofi., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DW, CM, BA, AAA, TB, VG, EJK, KMT, and MTE are current employees of and hold stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. MEA and DET are former employees of and hold stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. EB has received honoraria from AstraZeneca and Sanofi for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events. TH has participated in Data Safety Monitoring Boards and ad-hoc advisory boards for Sanofi, Data Safety Monitoring Boards for Enanta, and ad-hoc advisory boards for Janssen and has received honoraria from Janssen and Merck, Sharp & Dohme (MSD) for lectures at academic meetings. CK has received honoraria from F Hoffmann-La Roche for lectures. FM-T's research activities are supported by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grant numbers: PI16/01569, PI19/01090, PI22/00406, and CB21/06/00103), GEN-COVID (grant number: IN845D 2020/23), and Grupos de Referencia Competitiva (grant number: IIN607A2021/05), and he has received additional grants to his institution from AstraZeneca and Sanofi; he also received honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, MSD, Seqirus, Biofabri, and Janssen for taking part in advisory boards and expert meetings and for acting as speaker in congresses outside the scope of the submitted work, in addition to travel support from GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Pfizer, and Sanofi. FM-T has also participated in advisory boards for Pfizer, MSD, Sanofi, and GlaxoSmithKline, and in Data Safety Monitoring Boards for Biofabri; is a member of The European Technical Advisory Group of Experts—WHO Europe and the Spanish Paediatric Infectious Diseases Society; and has also acted as principal investigator in randomised controlled trials for AstraZeneca, Biofabri Seqirus, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, Novavax, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Regeneron, and Sanofi Pasteur with honoraria paid to his institution. MCN has received grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials, Pfizer, and Sanofi Pasteur; honoraria from Sanofi for lectures presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events; payment for expert testimony from Pfizer and Sanofi Pasteur; and is a board member for Gavi vaccine alliance. JMP has received payments to his institution from the Canadian Paediatric Review and Yearly RSV Coordinators Workshop and is an unpaid co-chair of the Ontario Immunization Advisory Committee. PR has received investigator-initiated research grants to his institution from MSD and has received institutional funding from GlaxoSmithKline for local and international lectures and from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Sanofi, and Pfizer for participation in advisory boards. RTS has received payment or honoraria for lectures for AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi Pasteur. CV has received payment or honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca. LJB has not received personal fees or other personal benefits from pharmaceutical companies. His institution, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), has received major funding (>€100 000 per industrial partner) from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD, and MeMed Diagnostics for investigator-initiated studies. UMCU has received major funding for the RSV-GOLD study from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. UMCU has received major funding as part of the public private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU and PROMISE projects with partners GlaxoSmithKline, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi Pasteur. UMCU has received major funding by Julius Clinical for participating in clinical studies sponsored by AstraZeneca and Pfizer. UMCU has received minor funding (€1 000–25 000 per industrial partner) for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, GlaxoSmithKline, Novavax, Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, MSD, Sanofi, Genzyme, and Janssen. LJB is the founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: LJB has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners and has not received personal fees or other personal benefits; the University Medical Center Utrecht has received funding for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD, and MeMed Diagnostics; major funding for the RSV GOLD study from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; major funding as part of the public–private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU and PROMISE projects with partners GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi; major funding by Julius Clinical for participating in clinical studies sponsored by MedImmune and Pfizer; and funding for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, GSK, Novavax, Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca, MSD, Sanofi, Genzyme, and Janssen. LJB is the founding Chair of the ReSViNET Foundation. M-NB declares no competing interests.

Competing Interests: XC-E reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Novavax, Merck, Regeneron, and Pfizer. EAFS reports honoraria for lectures or presentations from Pfizer and AstraZeneca; and payments to his institution in grants (from AstraZeneca, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, and Johnson & Johnson), in consulting fees (from Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi, Cidara Therapeutics, Adiago Therapeutics, Nuance Pharmaceuticals, Icosavax, Johnson & Johnson, and Sobi), in support for attending meetings (from AstraZeneca), and for participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board (from AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation). BAP reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca and Sanofi; honoraria for lectures or presentations from AstraZeneca and Sanofi; and payment for participation on an advisory board from Sanofi. LJB declares no competing interests. XC-E, EAFS, LJB, and BAP formed the writing committee for this work.

COVID-19 vaccinations are recommended for children with cancer but data on their vaccination response is scarce. This study assesses the antibody and T-cell response following a 2- or 3-dose vaccination with BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in children (5-17 years) with cancer. For the antibody response, participants with a serum concentration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike 1 antibodies of >300 binding antibody units per milliliter were classified as good responders. For the T-cell response, categorization was based on spike S1 specific interferon-gamma release with good responders having >200 milli-international units per milliliter. The patients were categorized as being treated with chemo/immunotherapy for less than 6 weeks (Tx < 6 weeks) or more than 6 weeks (Tx > 6 weeks) before the first immunization event. In 46 patients given a 2-dose vaccination series, the percentage of good antibody and good T-cell responders was 39.3% and 73.7% in patients with Tx < 6 weeks and 94.4% and 100% in patients with Tx > 6 weeks, respectively. An additional 3rd vaccination in 16 patients with Tx < 6 weeks, increased the percentage of good antibody responders to 70% with no change in T-cell response. A 3-dose vaccination series effectively boosted antibody levels and is of value for patients undergoing active cancer treatment.

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection causes considerable illness in older adults. The efficacy and safety of an investigational bivalent RSV prefusion F protein-based (RSVpreF) vaccine in this population are unknown., Methods: In this ongoing, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, adults (≥60 years of age) to receive a single intramuscular injection of RSVpreF vaccine at a dose of 120 μg (RSV subgroups A and B, 60 μg each) or placebo. The two primary end points were vaccine efficacy against seasonal RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness with at least two or at least three signs or symptoms. The secondary end point was vaccine efficacy against RSV-associated acute respiratory illness., Results: At the interim analysis (data-cutoff date, July 14, 2022), 34,284 participants had received RSVpreF vaccine (17,215 participants) or placebo (17,069 participants). RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness with at least two signs or symptoms occurred in 11 participants in the vaccine group (1.19 cases per 1000 person-years of observation) and 33 participants in the placebo group (3.58 cases per 1000 person-years of observation) (vaccine efficacy, 66.7%; 96.66% confidence interval [CI], 28.8 to 85.8); 2 cases (0.22 cases per 1000 person-years of observation) and 14 cases (1.52 cases per 1000 person-years of observation), respectively, occurred with at least three signs or symptoms (vaccine efficacy, 85.7%; 96.66% CI, 32.0 to 98.7). RSV-associated acute respiratory illness occurred in 22 participants in the vaccine group (2.38 cases per 1000 person-years of observation) and 58 participants in the placebo group (6.30 cases per 1000 person-years of observation) (vaccine efficacy, 62.1%; 95% CI, 37.1 to 77.9). The incidence of local reactions was higher with vaccine (12%) than with placebo (7%); the incidences of systemic events were similar (27% and 26%, respectively). Similar rates of adverse events through 1 month after injection were reported (vaccine, 9.0%; placebo, 8.5%), with 1.4% and 1.0%, respectively, considered by the investigators to be injection-related. Severe or life-threatening adverse events were reported in 0.5% of vaccine recipients and 0.4% of placebo recipients. Serious adverse events were reported in 2.3% of participants in each group through the data-cutoff date., Conclusions: RSVpreF vaccine prevented RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness and RSV-associated acute respiratory illness in adults (≥60 years of age), without evident safety concerns. (Funded by Pfizer; RENOIR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05035212; EudraCT number, 2021-003693-31.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Whether vaccination during pregnancy could reduce the burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated lower respiratory tract illness in newborns and infants is uncertain., Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind trial conducted in 18 countries, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, pregnant women at 24 through 36 weeks' gestation to receive a single intramuscular injection of 120 μg of a bivalent RSV prefusion F protein-based (RSVpreF) vaccine or placebo. The two primary efficacy end points were medically attended severe RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness and medically attended RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness in infants within 90, 120, 150, and 180 days after birth. A lower boundary of the confidence interval for vaccine efficacy (99.5% confidence interval [CI] at 90 days; 97.58% CI at later intervals) greater than 20% was considered to meet the success criterion for vaccine efficacy with respect to the primary end points., Results: At this prespecified interim analysis, the success criterion for vaccine efficacy was met with respect to one primary end point. Overall, 3682 maternal participants received vaccine and 3676 received placebo; 3570 and 3558 infants, respectively, were evaluated. Medically attended severe lower respiratory tract illness occurred within 90 days after birth in 6 infants of women in the vaccine group and 33 infants of women in the placebo group (vaccine efficacy, 81.8%; 99.5% CI, 40.6 to 96.3); 19 cases and 62 cases, respectively, occurred within 180 days after birth (vaccine efficacy, 69.4%; 97.58% CI, 44.3 to 84.1). Medically attended RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness occurred within 90 days after birth in 24 infants of women in the vaccine group and 56 infants of women in the placebo group (vaccine efficacy, 57.1%; 99.5% CI, 14.7 to 79.8); these results did not meet the statistical success criterion. No safety signals were detected in maternal participants or in infants and toddlers up to 24 months of age. The incidences of adverse events reported within 1 month after injection or within 1 month after birth were similar in the vaccine group (13.8% of women and 37.1% of infants) and the placebo group (13.1% and 34.5%, respectively)., Conclusions: RSVpreF vaccine administered during pregnancy was effective against medically attended severe RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness in infants, and no safety concerns were identified. (Funded by Pfizer; MATISSE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04424316.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of hospitalisation in infants. The burden of RSV infection in healthy term infants has not yet been established. Accurate health-care burden data in healthy infants are necessary to determine RSV immunisation policy when RSV immunisation becomes available., Methods: We performed a multicentre, prospective, observational birth cohort study in healthy term-born infants (≥37 weeks of gestation) in five sites located in different European countries to determine the health-care burden of RSV. The incidence of RSV-associated hospitalisations in the first year of life was determined by parental questionnaires and hospital chart reviews. We performed active RSV surveillance in a nested cohort to determine the incidence of medically attended RSV infections. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03627572., Findings: In total, 9154 infants born between July 1, 2017, and April 1, 2020, were followed up during the first year of life and 993 participated in the nested active surveillance cohort. The incidence of RSV-associated hospitalisations in the total cohort was 1·8% (95% CI 1·6-2·1). There were eight paediatric intensive care unit admissions, corresponding to 5·5% of 145 RSV-associated hospitalisations and 0·09% of the total cohort. Incidence of RSV infection in the active surveillance cohort confirmed by any diagnostic assay was 26·2% (24·0-28·6) and that of medically attended RSV infection was 14·1% (12·3-16·0)., Interpretation: RSV-associated acute respiratory infection causes substantial morbidity, leading to the hospitalisation of one in every 56 healthy term-born infants in high-income settings. Immunisation of pregnant women or healthy term-born infants during their first winter season could have a major effect on the health-care burden caused by RSV infections., Funding: Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking, with support from the EU's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests LJB has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners. He has not received personal fees or other personal benefits. UMCU has received major funding (>€100 000 per industrial partner) for investigator initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD, and MeMed Diagnostics. UMCU has received major funding for the RSV GOLD study from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. UMCU has received major funding as part of the public private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU and PROMISE projects with partners GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi. UMCU has received major funding by Julius Clinical for participating in clinical studies sponsored by MedImmune and Pfizer. UMCU received minor funding (€1000–25 000 per industrial partner) for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, GSK, Novavax, Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca, MSD, Sanofi, Genzyme, and Janssen. LJB is the founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation. SC has provided consultancy or investigator roles in relation to product development for Ablynx, Janssen, MedImmune, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, GSK, Vertex, AbbVie, Valneva, Fibrogen, and Boehringer Ingelheim, with fees paid to the University of Edinburgh. FM-T reports honoraria from GSK group, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, MSD, Seqirus, Biofabri, and Janssen for taking part in advisory boards and expert meetings and for acting as a speaker in congresses, outside the submitted work; and principal investigator-role in randomised controlled trials for GSK, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, MSD, Seqirus, Biofabri, Janssen, Ablynx, Gilead, Regeneron, Roche, Abbott, Novavax, and MedImmune, with honoraria paid to his institution. MDS acts as an investigator on behalf of the University of Oxford on research studies funded by vaccine manufacturers including GSK, Janssen, MCM vaccines, Novavax, AtraZeneca, and Pfizer. MDS was an National Institute for Heath and Care Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator and received salary support from the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre during the course of this work. MDS is currently an employee of Moderna. SBD had received honoraria from MSD and Sanofi Pasteur for taking part in advisory boards and has provided consultancy or investigator roles in relation to product development for Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Valneva, MSD, and Sanofi Pasteur with fees paid to St George's University of London. TH has received honoraria for lectures or participation in advisory boards or data monitoring committees from Janssen, Sanofi Pasteur, Enanta, and MSD. BR is a full-time employee of the GSK group and holds shares and restricted shares in the GSK group as part of their employee remuneration. AJP is currently Chair of the Department of Health Social Cares Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation and was previously a member of WHO Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies and chair of the European Medicine's Agency Scientific Advisory Group on Vaccines. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Signal inhibitory receptor on leukocytes-1 (SIRL-1) is an immune inhibitory receptor expressed on human granulocytes and monocytes that dampens antimicrobial functions. We previously showed that sputum neutrophils from infants with severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis have decreased SIRL-1 surface expression compared with blood neutrophils and that SIRL-1 surface expression is rapidly lost from in vitro activated neutrophils. This led us to hypothesize that activated neutrophils lose SIRL-1 by ectodomain shedding. Here, we developed an ELISA and measured the concentration of soluble SIRL-1 (sSIRL-1) in patients with RSV bronchiolitis and hospitalized patients with COVID-19, which are both characterized by neutrophilic inflammation. In line with our hypothesis, sSIRL-1 concentration was increased in sputum compared with plasma of patients with RSV bronchiolitis and in serum of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 compared with control serum. In addition, we show that in vitro activated neutrophils release sSIRL-1 by proteolytic cleavage and that this diminishes the ability to inhibit neutrophilic reactive oxygen species production via SIRL-1. Finally, we found that SIRL-1 shedding is prevented by proteinase 3 inhibition and by extracellular adherence protein from Staphylococcus aureus. Notably, we recently showed that SIRL-1 is activated by PSMα3 from S. aureus, suggesting that S. aureus may counteract SIRL-1 shedding to benefit from preserved inhibitory function of SIRL-1. In conclusion, we report that SIRL-1 is released from activated neutrophils by proteinase 3 cleavage and that endogenous sSIRL-1 protein is present in vivo., (Copyright © 2023 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.)

Background: According to the World Health Organization, the global burden of nosocomial infections is poorly characterized as surveillance systems are lacking. Nosocomial infections occur at higher rates in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) than in high-income countries (HICs). Current global RSV burden estimates are largely based on community-acquired infection. We aimed to characterize children with nosocomial RSV-related mortality and to understand the potential impact of RSV immunization strategies., Materials: RSV GOLD is a global registry of children younger than 5 years who died with laboratory-confirmed RSV infection. We compared clinical and demographic characteristics of children with nosocomial and community-acquired RSV in-hospital mortality., Results: We included 231 nosocomial and 931 community-acquired RSV-related in-hospital from deaths from 65 countries. Age at death was similar for both groups (5.4 vs. 6 months). A higher proportion of nosocomial deaths had comorbidities (87% vs. 57%; P < 0.001) or was born preterm (46% vs. 24%; P < 0.001) than community-acquired deaths. The proportion of nosocomial deaths among all RSV deaths was lower in LMICs than in upper-middle-income countries (UMICs) and HICs (12% vs. 18% and 26%, respectively)., Conclusions: This is the first global case series of children dying with nosocomial RSV infection. Future infant-targeted immunization strategies could prevent the majority of nosocomial RSV-related deaths. Although nosocomial RSV deaths are expected to occur at highest rates in LMICs, the number of reported nosocomial RSV deaths was low in these countries. Hospital-based surveillance is needed to capture the full burden of nosocomial RSV mortality in LMICs., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Competing Interests: LJB has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners; he has not received personal fees or other personal benefits. LJB is the founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation. The authors’ institution, University Medical Center Utrecht, has received major funding (>€100 000 per industrial partner) for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD, and MeMed Diagnostics; major funding for the RSV GOLD study from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; major funding as part of the public–private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU and PROMISE projects with partners GlaxoSmithKline, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi; major funding by Julius Clinical for participating in clinical studies sponsored by MedImmune and Pfizer; minor funding (€1000–25 000 per industrial partner) for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, GlaxoSmithKline, Novavax, Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca, MSD, Sanofi, Genzyme, and Janssen. MB declares no competing interests.

Childhood allergic diseases, including asthma, rhinitis and eczema, are prevalent conditions that share strong genetic and environmental components. Diagnosis relies on clinical history and measurements of allergen-specific IgE. We hypothesize that a multi-omics model could accurately diagnose childhood allergic disease. We show that nasal DNA methylation has the strongest predictive power to diagnose childhood allergy, surpassing blood DNA methylation, genetic risk scores, and environmental factors. DNA methylation at only three nasal CpG sites classifies allergic disease in Dutch children aged 16 years well, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86. This is replicated in Puerto Rican children aged 9-20 years (AUC 0.82). DNA methylation at these CpGs additionally detects allergic multimorbidity and symptomatic IgE sensitization. Using nasal single-cell RNA-sequencing data, these three CpGs associate with influx of T cells and macrophages that contribute to allergic inflammation. Our study suggests the potential of methylation-based allergy diagnosis., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Introduction: The high burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in young children disproportionately occurs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The PROUD (Preventing RespiratOry syncytial virUs in unDerdeveloped countries) Taskforce of 24 RSV worldwide experts assessed key needs for RSV prevention in LMICs, including vaccine and newer preventive measures., Methods: A global, survey-based study was undertaken in 2021. An online questionnaire was developed following three meetings of the Taskforce panellists wherein factors related to RSV infection, its prevention and management were identified using iterative questioning. Each factor was scored, by non-panellists interested in RSV, on a scale of zero (very-low-relevance) to 100 (very-high-relevance) within two scenarios: (1) Current and (2) Future expectations for RSV management., Results: Ninety questionnaires were completed: 70 by respondents (71.4% physicians; 27.1% researchers/scientists) from 16 LMICs and 20 from nine high-income (HI) countries (90.0% physicians; 5.0% researchers/scientists), as a reference group. Within LMICs, RSV awareness was perceived to be low, and management was not prioritised. Of the 100 factors scored, those related to improved diagnosis particularly access to affordable point-of-care diagnostics, disease burden data generation, clinical and general education, prompt access to new interventions, and engagement with policymakers/payers were identified of paramount importance. There was a strong need for clinical education and local data generation in the lowest economies, whereas upper-middle income countries were more closely aligned with HI countries in terms of current RSV service provision., Conclusion: Seven key actions for improving RSV prevention and management in LMICs are proposed., Competing Interests: The reviewer PAP declared a past co-authorship with the author(s) FMT to the handling. XCE and BP have received research funding and/or compensation as advisor/lecturer from AbbVie and AstraZeneca. JF and BRG, working for Violicom and former company, have previously received payment from AbbVie and AstraZeneca for work on various projects. MCN reports grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Sanofi-Pasteur; and personal fees from Pfizer and Sanofi-Pasteur. RTS has received fees for Advisory Board meetings and lectures for Sanofi-Pasteur, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and AbbVie. QB serves in the Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) vaccine development for the protection of infants (since October 2015) (GlaxoSmithKline -GSK). JP reports grants to his institution from MedImmune, Merck, Sanofi Pasteur and AbbVie, and personal fees from AbbVie, Merck and AstraZeneca. JMP reports grants to his institution from MedImmune. HJZ has received funding for RSV-related research studies from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Merck and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. AM has received research funding from Merck and Janssen and compensation as advisor/lecturer from Sanofi-Pasteur and AstraZeneca. IM has been an investigator on studies funded by MedImmune, Regeneron, and Boehringer. MAS has received research funding from Janssen and compensation as advisor/lecturer from AbbVie, Sanofi-Pasteur and AstraZeneca. All declarations made by authors outside of the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2022 Carbonell-Estrany, Simões, Bont, Gentile, Homaira, Scotta, Stein, Torres, Sheikh, Broor, Khuri-Bulos, Nokes, Munywoki, Bassat, Sharma, Basnet, Garba, De Jesus-Cornejo, Lupisan, Nunes, Divarathna, Fullarton, Rodgers-Gray, Keary, Reñosa, Verwey, Moore, Noordeen, Kabra, do Vale, Paternina-De La Ossa, Mariño, Figueras-Aloy, Krilov, Berezin, Zar, Paudel, Safadi, Dbaibo, Jroundi, Jha, Rafeek, Pinheiro, Bracht, Muthugala, Lanari, Martinón-Torres, Mitchell, Irimu, Pandey, Krishnan, Mejias, Santos Corrêa Da Costa, Shrestha, Pernica, Cotrim de Carvalho, Jalango, Ibrahim, Ewa, Ensinck, Ulloa-Gutierrez, Miralha, Lucion, Hassan, Akhtar, Aleem, Chowdhury, Rojo, Sande, Musau, Zaman, Arlant, Ghimire, Price, Subedi, Brenes-Chacon, Goswami, Rahman, Hossain, Chisti, Vain, Lim, Chiu, Papenburg, Juarez, Senaratne, Arunasalam, Strand, Ayuk, Ogunrinde, Tavares, Garba, Garba, Dawa, Gordon, Osoro, Agoti, Nyawanda, Ngama, Tabu, Mathew, Cornacchia, Rai, Jain, Giongo and Paes.)

Background and Objectives: Adenovirus causes acute respiratory illness that can mimic bacterial infection, making it challenging to differentiate adenoviral infection from adenoviral-bacterial co-infection. A host-protein score (BV score) for differentiating bacterial from viral infection that combines the expression levels of TNF-related apoptosis-induced ligand, interferon gamma-induced protein-10, and C-reactive protein exhibited a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98% in prior studies. Here we evaluate BV score's diagnostic accuracy in pediatrics with adenovirus PCR detection., Methods: This is a sub-analysis of children aged 3 months to 20 years with adenovirus PCR-positive infection recruited prospectively in two previous cohort studies. Reference standard diagnosis (bacterial, viral or indeterminate) was based on expert adjudication. BV score ranges from 0 to 100 and provides three results based on predefined cutoffs: viral or other non-bacterial etiology (0 ≤ score < 35), equivocal (35 ≤ score ≤ 65), and bacterial or co-infection (65 < score ≤ 100). Experts were blinded to BV results., Results: Out of 1,779 children, 142 had an adenovirus PCR-positive nasopharyngeal swab. Median age was 1.2 years (interquartile range 0.6-1.8), 50.7% were male and 52.8% were hospitalized. 12 cases were reference standard bacterial, 115 reference standard viral and 15 were indeterminate. BV score attained sensitivity of 100.0% (no false negatives), specificity of 89.5% (95% confidence interval: 83.2-95.8), and NPV of 100.0% (92.6-100.0). Equivocal rate was 19.7%., Conclusions: BV score accurately differentiated between adenoviral and bacterial-adenoviral co-infection in this cohort of children with PCR-positive adenovirus detection. This performance supports a potential to improve appropriate antibiotic use., Competing Interests: MS (Stein, SMC) and EB are part time employees of MeMed. LJB has not received personal fees or other personal benefits but his institution, UMCU has received major funding for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer and MeMed. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2022 Stein, Shapira, Bamberger, Chistyakov, Dumov, Srugo, Stein, Bont and Klein.)

Importance: In the early COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 testing was only accessible and recommended for symptomatic persons or adults. This restriction hampered assessment of the true incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children as well as detailed characterization of the SARS-CoV-2 disease spectrum and how this spectrum compared with that of other common respiratory illnesses., Objective: To estimate the community incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and parents and to assess the symptoms and symptom severity of respiratory illness episodes involving SARS-CoV-2-positive test results relative to those with SARS-CoV-2-negative test results., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study randomly selected Dutch households with at least 1 child younger than 18 years. A total of 1209 children and adults from 307 households were prospectively followed up between August 25, 2020, and July 29, 2021, covering the second and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Participation included SARS-CoV-2 screening at 4- to 6-week intervals during the first 23 weeks of participation (core study period; August 25, 2020, to July 29, 2021). Participants in all households finishing the core study before July 1, 2021, were invited to participate in the extended follow-up and to actively report respiratory symptoms using an interactive app until July 1, 2021. At new onset of respiratory symptoms or a SARS-CoV-2 positive test result, a household outbreak study was initiated, which included daily symptom recording, repeated polymerase chain reaction testing (nose-throat swabs and saliva and fecal samples), and SARS-CoV-2 antibody measurement (paired dried blood spots) in all household members. Outbreaks, households, and episodes of respiratory illness were described as positive or negative depending on SARS-CoV-2 test results. Data on participant race and ethnicity were not reported because they were not uniformly collected in the original cohorts and were therefore not representative or informative., Exposures: SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative respiratory illness episodes., Main Outcomes and Measures: Age-stratified incidence rates, symptoms, and symptom severity for SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative respiratory illness episodes., Results: Among 307 households including 1209 participants (638 female [52.8%]; 403 [33.3%] aged <12 years, 179 [14.8%] aged 12-17 years, and 627 [51.9%] aged ≥18 years), 183 household outbreaks of respiratory illness were observed during the core study and extended follow-up period, of which 63 (34.4%) were SARS-CoV-2 positive (59 outbreaks [32.2%] during the core study and 4 outbreaks [2.2%] during follow-up). SARS-CoV-2 incidence was similar across all ages (0.24/person-year [PY]; 95% CI, 0.21-0.28/PY). Overall, 33 of 134 confirmed SARS-CoV-2 episodes (24.6%) were asymptomatic. The incidence of SARS-CoV-2-negative respiratory illness episodes was highest in children younger than 12 years (0.94/PY; 95% CI, 0.89-0.97/PY). When comparing SARS-CoV-2-positive vs SARS-CoV-2-negative respiratory illness episodes in children younger than 12 years, no differences were observed in number of symptoms (median [IQR], 2 [2-4] for both groups), symptom severity (median [IQR] maximum symptom severity score, 6 [4-9] vs 7 [6-13]), or symptom duration (median [IQR], 6 [5-12] days vs 8 [4-13] days). However, among adults, SARS-CoV-2-positive episodes had a significantly higher number (median [IQR], 6 [4-8] vs 3 [2-4]), severity (median [IQR] maximum symptom severity score, 15 [9-19] vs 7 [6-11]), and duration (median [IQR] 13 [8-29] days vs 5 [3-11] days; P < .001 for all comparisons) of symptoms vs SARS-CoV-2-negative episodes., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, during the first pandemic year when mostly partial or full in-person learning occurred, the SARS-CoV-2 incidence rate in children was substantially higher than estimated from routine testing or seroprevalence data and was similar to that of adult household members. Unlike in unvaccinated adults, SARS-CoV-2 symptoms and symptom severity in children were similar to other common respiratory illnesses. These findings may prove useful when developing pediatric COVID-19 vaccine recommendations.

The risk of a severe course of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in adults with Down syndrome is increased, resulting in an up to 10-fold increase in mortality, in particular in those >40 years of age. After primary SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, the higher risks remain. In this prospective observational cohort study, SARS-CoV-2 spike S1-specific antibody responses after routine SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (BNT162b2, messenger RNA [mRNA]-1273, or ChAdOx1) in adults with Down syndrome and healthy controls were compared. Adults with Down syndrome showed lower antibody concentrations after 2 mRNA vaccinations or after 2 ChAdOx1 vaccinations. After 2 mRNA vaccinations, lower antibody concentrations were seen with increasing age., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT05145348., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Little RSV activity was observed during the first expected RSV season since the COVID-19 pandemic. Multiple countries later experienced out-of-season RSV resurgences, yet their association with non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) is unclear. This study aimed to describe the changes in RSV epidemiology during the COVID-19 pandemic and to estimate the association between individual NPIs and the RSV resurgences., Methods: RSV activity from Week (W)12-2020 to W44-2021 was compared with three pre-pandemic seasons using RSV surveillance data from Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Israel, Japan, South Africa, South Korea, Taiwan, the Netherlands and the United States. Changes in nine NPIs within 10 weeks before RSV resurgences were described. Associations between NPIs and RSV activity were assessed with linear mixed models. Adherence to NPIs was not taken into account., Results: Average delay of the first RSV season during the COVID-19 pandemic was 39 weeks (range: 13-88 weeks). Although the delay was <40 weeks in six countries, a missed RSV season was observed in Brazil, Chile, Japan, Canada and South Korea. School closures, workplace closures, and stay-at-home requirements were most commonly downgraded before an RSV resurgence. Reopening schools and lifting stay-at-home requirements were associated with increases of 1.31% (p = 0.04) and 2.27% (p = 0.06) in the deviation from expected RSV activity., Conclusion: The first RSV season during the COVID-19 pandemic was delayed in the 11 countries included. Reopening of schools was consistently associated with increased RSV activity. As NPIs were often changed concomitantly, the association between RSV activity and school closures may be partly attributed to other NPIs., (© 2022 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Recurrent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection requiring hospitalization is rare and the underlying mechanism is unknown. We aimed to determine the role of CD14-mediated immunity in the pathogenesis of recurrent RSV infection., Methods: We performed genotyping and longitudinal immunophenotyping of the first patient with a genetic CD14 deficiency who developed recurrent RSV infection. We analyzed gene expression profiles and interleukin (IL)-6 production by patient peripheral blood mononuclear cells in response to RSV pre- and post-fusion (F) protein. We generated CD14-deficient human nasal epithelial cells cultured at air-liquid interface (HNEC-ALI) of patient-derived cells and after CRISPR-based gene editing of control cells. We analyzed viral replication upon RSV infection., Results: Sanger sequencing revealed a homozygous single-nucleotide deletion in CD14, resulting in absence of the CD14 protein in the index patient. In vitro, viral replication was similar in wild-type and CD14-/- HNEC-ALI. Loss of immune cell CD14 led to impaired cytokine and chemokine responses to RSV pre- and post-F protein, characterized by absence of IL-6 production., Conclusions: We report an association of recurrent RSV bronchiolitis with a loss of CD14 function in immune cells. Lack of CD14 function led to defective immune responses to RSV pre- and post-F protein without a change in viral replication., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) surveillance is heavily dependent on the influenza-like illness (ILI) case definition from the World Health Organization (WHO). Because ILI includes fever in its syndromic case definition, its ability to accurately identify acute respiratory tract infections (ARTI) caused by RSV in older adults is uncertain., Methods: The accuracy of the WHO ILI and a modified ILI (requiring only self-reported fever) case definitions in identifying patients with PCR-confirmed RSV-ARTI was evaluated in community-dwelling older adults (≥60 years) from the prospective European RESCEU cohort study., Results: Among 1040 participants, 750 ARTI episodes were analyzed including 36 confirmed RSV-ARTI. Due to a general lack of fever, sensitivity for RSV-ARTI was 33% for modified ILI and 11% for ILI. The area under the curve for both ILI definitions was 0.52 indicating poor discrimination for RSV. RSV-ARTI could not be distinguished from all other ARTI based on clinical symptoms., Conclusions: The use of ILI underestimated the occurrence of RSV-ARTI in community-dwelling older adults up to 9-fold (11% sensitivity). Because worldwide RSV surveillance depends largely on ILI, there is an urgent need for a better approach to measure the occurrence of RSV disease and the impact of future RSV vaccine introduction. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT03621930., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. C. B. reports personal fees from Roche, and grants and personal fees from Jannsen Pharmaceuticals. L. B. has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners and is founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation; he has not received personal fees or other personal benefits. His institution has received major funding (>€100 000 per industrial partner) for investigator initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, Janssen, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Nutricia (Danone), and MeMed Diagnostics; major cash or in kind funding as part of the public private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU project from GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi; major funding from Julius Clinical for participating in the INFORM study sponsored by MedImmune; minor funding for participation in trials by Regeneron and Janssen from 2015 to 2017 (total annual estimate less than €20 000); and minor funding for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, Novavax, Pfizer, and Janssen (total annual estimate less than €20 000). T. V. reports grants from Abbott, Becton Dickinson, Bio-Merieux, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes a substantial disease burden among children, elderly and immunocompromised adults. Recognition of patient involvement in research is gradually increasing. Most research is being carried out without active patient involvement other than patients participating as study subjects, and most knowledge gained through research only partially reaches the general public. Since 2016, the RSV Patient Advisory Board has officially been involved as an advisory group in the Respiratory Syncytial Virus Consortium in Europe (RESCEU). What started as a small single-center initiative, is now growing towards an international organization providing patient perspectives as inputs to scientists, and improving awareness of RSV. This article summarizes the history, current role, and future aims of the RSV Patient Advisory Board as an advocate to improve patient involvement in research. RSV patients and their representatives are important stakeholders in setting the global research agenda, and educating patients, professionals, and the general public., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . L. J. B. has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners for which he has not received personal fees or other personal benefits; and is the founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation. All other authors report no potential conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Knowledge about how older adults get a respiratory infection is crucial for planning preventive strategies. We aimed to determine how contact with young children living outside of the household affects the risk of acute respiratory tract infections (ARTI) in community-dwelling older adults., Methods: This study is part of the European RESCEU older adult study. Weekly surveillance was performed to detect ARTI throughout 2 winter seasons (2017-2018, 2018-2019). Child exposure, defined as having regular contact with children under 5 living outside of the subject's household, was assessed at baseline. The average attributable fraction was calculated to determine the fraction of ARTI explained by exposure to these children., Results: We prospectively established that 597/1006 (59%) participants experienced at least 1 ARTI. Child exposure increased the risk of all-cause ARTI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21 -2.08; P = .001). This risk was highest in those with the most frequent contact (aOR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.23-2.63; P = .003). The average attributable fraction of child exposure explaining ARTI was 10% (95% CI, 5%-15%)., Conclusions: One of 10 ARTI in community-dwelling older adults is attributable to exposure to preschool children living outside of the household., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03621930., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. C. B. reports personal fees from Roche, and grants and personal fees from Jannsen Pharmaceuticals. L. B. has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners and is founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation; he has not received personal fees or other personal benefits. His institution has received major funding (>€100 000 per industrial partner) for investigator initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, Janssen, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Nutricia (Danone), and MeMed Diagnostics; major cash or in kind funding as part of the public private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU project from GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi; major funding from Julius Clinical for participating in the INFORM study sponsored by MedImmune; minor funding for participation in trials by Regeneron and Janssen from 2015 to 2017 (total annual estimate less than €20 000); and minor funding for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, Novavax, Pfizer, and Janssen (total annual estimate less than €20 000). T. V. reports grants from Abbott, Becton Dickinson, Bio-Merieux, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes a substantial burden in older adults. Viral load in RSV-infected adults is generally lower compared to young children, which could result in suboptimal sensitivity of RSV diagnostics. Although the Xpert® Xpress Flu/RSV assay has been used in routine clinical care, its sensitivity to diagnose RSV infection in older adults is largely unknown. We aimed to compare the performance of the Xpert® Xpress Flu/RSV assay with real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in home-dwelling older adults (≥60 years of age)., Methods: Nasopharyngeal swabs were tested with Xpert® Xpress Flu/RSV and compared to RSV RT-PCR in older adults with acute respiratory tract infections with different levels of disease severity., Results: We studied 758 respiratory samples from 561 older adults from 2 consecutive RSV seasons. Thirty-five (4.6%) samples tested positive for RSV by at least 1 of the assays, of which 2 samples were negative by Xpert® Xpress Flu/RSV and 3 samples by real-time RT-PCR. The positive percentage agreement (PPA) was 90.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.4%-96.8%) and negative percentage agreement was 99.7% (95% CI, 99.0%-99.9%). Viral loads were low (≤103 copies/mL or cycle threshold value ≥34) in all cases with discordant results for the 2 assays., Conclusions: The PPA of Xpert® Xpress Flu/RSV compared to routine RT-PCR is high for RSV detection in home-dwelling older adults. The assay is fast and easy to use at the point of care., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03621930., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. N. A. reports grants and nonfinancial support from European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme and EFPIA, during the conduct of the study. O. G. reports personal fees from GSK, outside the submitted work. C. B. reports grants from the European Union, during the conduct of the study; and personal fees from Roche, grants and personal fees from Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and grants from the National Institute of Health Care Research, outside the submitted work. S. C. reports grants and nonfinancial support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme and EFPIA, during the conduct of the study. L. J. B. has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners, but has not received personal fees or other personal benefits. He is also the founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation. University Medical Centre Utrecht has received major funding (>€100,000 per industrial partner) for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, Janssen, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Nutricia (Danone), and MeMed Diagnostics; major cash or in-kind funding as part of the public-private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU project from GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi; major funding by Julius Clinical for participating in the INFORM study sponsored by MedImmune; minor funding for participation in trials by Regeneron and Janssen from 2015 to 2017 (total annual estimate <€20,000); and minor funding for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, Novavax, Pfizer, and Janssen (total annual estimate <€20,000). All other authors report no potential conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Objectives: Year-to-year variation in respiratory viruses may result in lower attack rates than expected. We aimed to illustrate the impact of year-to-year variation in attack rates on the likelihood of demonstrating vaccine efficacy (VE)., Study Design and Setting: We considered an individually randomized maternal vaccine trial against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated hospitalizations. For 10 RSV-associated hospitalizations per 1,000 infants, sample size to have 80% power for true VE of 50% and 70% was 9,846 and 4,424 participants. We reported power to show VE for varying attack rates, selected to reflect realistic year-to-year variation using observational studies. Eight scenarios including varying number of countries and seasons were developed to assess the influence of these trial parameters., Results: Including up to three seasons decreased the width of the interquartile range for power. Including more seasons concentrated statistical power closer to 80%. Least powered trials had higher statistical power with more seasons. In all scenarios, at least half of the trials had <80% power. For three-season trials, increasing the sample size by 10% reduced the percentage of underpowered trials to less than one-quarter of trials., Conclusion: Year-to-year variation in RSV attack rates should be accounted for during trial design. Mitigation strategies include recruiting over more seasons, or adaptive trial designs., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major health problem. A better understanding of the geographical and temporal dynamics of RSV circulation will assist in tracking resistance against therapeutics currently under development. Since 2015, the field of RSV molecular epidemiology has evolved rapidly with around 20-30 published articles per year. The objective of this systematic review is to identify knowledge gaps in recent RSV genetic literature to guide global molecular epidemiology research. We included 78 studies published between 2015 and 2020 describing 12,998 RSV sequences of which 8,233 (63%) have been uploaded to GenBank. Seventeen (22%) studies were performed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and seven (9%) studies sequenced whole-genomes. Although most reported polymorphisms for monoclonal antibodies in clinical development (nirsevimab, MK-1654) have not been tested for resistance in neutralisation essays, known resistance was detected at low levels for the nirsevimab and palivizumab binding site. High resistance was found for the suptavumab binding site. We present the first literature review of an enormous amount of RSV genetic data. The need for global monitoring of RSV molecular epidemiology becomes increasingly important in evaluating the effectiveness of monoclonal antibody candidates as they reach their final stages of clinical development. We have identified the following three knowledge gaps: whole-genome data to study global RSV evolution, data from LMICs and data from global surveillance programs., (© 2021 The Authors. Reviews in Medical Virology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)