Search

Purpose: We aim to quantify multiaxial cardiac pulsatility-induced deformation of the thoracic aorta after ascending thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) as a part of the GORE ARISE Early Feasibility Study. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients (7 females and 8 males, age 73±9 years) with ascending TEVAR underwent computed tomography angiography with retrospective cardiac gating. Geometric modeling of the thoracic aorta was performed; geometric features including axial length, effective diameter, and centerline, inner surface, and outer surface curvatures were quantified for systole and diastole; and pulsatile deformations were calculated for the ascending aorta, arch, and descending aorta. Results: From diastole to systole, the ascending endograft exhibited straightening of the centerline (0.224±0.039 to 0.217±0.039 cm−1, p<0.05) and outer surface (0.181±0.028 to 0.177±0.029 cm−1, p<0.05) curvatures. No significant changes were observed for inner surface curvature, diameter, or axial length in the ascending endograft. The aortic arch did not exhibit any significant deformation in axial length, diameter, or curvature. The descending aorta exhibited small but significant expansion of effective diameter from 2.59±0.46 to 2.63±0.44 cm (p<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the native ascending aorta (from prior literature), ascending TEVAR damps axial and bending pulsatile deformations of the ascending aorta similar to how descending TEVAR damps descending aortic deformations, while diametric deformations are damped to a greater extent. Downstream diametric and bending pulsatility of the native descending aorta was muted compared with that in patients without ascending TEVAR (from prior literature). Deformation data from this study can be used to evaluate the mechanical durability of ascending aortic devices and inform physicians about the downstream effects of ascending TEVAR to help predict remodeling and guide future interventional strategies. Clinical Impact: This study quantified local deformations of both stented ascending and native descending aortas to reveal the biomechanical impact of ascending TEVAR on the entire thoracic aorta, and reported that the ascending TEVAR muted cardiac-induced deformation of the stented ascending aorta and native descending aorta. Understanding of in vivo deformations of the stented ascending aorta, aortic arch and descending aorta can inform physicians about the downstream effects of ascending TEVAR. Notable reduction of compliance may lead to cardiac remodeling and long-term systemic complications. This is the first report which included dedicated deformation data regarding ascending aortic endograft from clinical trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) are an increasingly prevalent pathology with significant associated morbidity and mortality. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the primary line of treatment. The purpose of this study was to analyse a single center's experience in the treatment of TAAs and identify possible risk factors for worse outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review of our institutional database was done to identify all patients treated for TAAs in a 10-year period, from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2022. Data were extracted from patients' medical records. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes were procedure related morbidity (vascular access complications, medullary ischaemia, stroke, endoleaks, migration, aneurysm sac enlargement >5 mm) and need for reintervention at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up. A descriptive and inferential analysis of the data was performed. Statistical analyses were conducted using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software. Results: We identified 34 patients treated for TAAs in this period. Mean age was 68 years [47–87] and 79.4% of patients were male. Mean aneurysm diameter was 63 mm [35–100], 55.9% fusiform and 44.1% saccular. The majority (91.2%) were located at the descending thoracic aorta and 3 (8.8%) of them extended to the aortic arch. The most common aetiology was degenerative in 22 patients (64.7%), followed by aortic dissection in 8 patients (23.5%). Elective surgery was performed in 19 (61.3%) patients and 12 (38.7%) had urgent repair. TEVAR was the treatment of choice in 24 (77.4%) patients, and the remaining 7 (22.6%) were treated with hybrid surgery. Mean length of hospital stay was 10 days [2–80] (6 days for elective repair versus 16 days for urgent repair, p =.016). Follow-up period ranged from 1 month to 10 years. At 1 year follow-up, all-cause mortality was 15%, morbidity was 30% (with 6 (22%) patients having a type Ia endoleak) and need for reintervention was 22%. Aneurysm diameter was a significant risk factor for procedure related morbidity (median diameter of 73.5 mm versus 56.0 mm in patients with no morbidity; p =.027). The presence of type Ia endoleak was significantly associated with higher reintervention rates (p =.001), but not with higher mortality rates (p =.515). Age, female sex, aetiology and urgent repair weren't associated with any significant differences in the outcomes. Conclusions: TEVAR proved to be effective in the treatment of TAAs, with good outcomes at short and mid-term follow-up. TAAs should be diagnosed earlier and be promptly treated when meeting criteria to prevent worse outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: It is challenging to simultaneously conduct total endovascular repair and reconstruct the left subclavian artery (LSA) and isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA) in patients who had an ILVA and required zone 2 anchoring. This pilot study reported the initial application experience of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with a proximal zone 2 landing for aortic arch reconstruction in patients with ILVA. Methods: This study was a retrospective consecutive single-center case series analysis, which involved four patients with ILVA who required zone 2 anchoring and received TEVAR combined with a single-branched stent graft and concomitant on-table fenestration between March 2021 and December 2022. Results: The postoperative follow-up period was 6–27 months, and no postoperative deaths or other primary complications occurred. There were no signs of a stroke or spinal cord ischemia, as well as no chest or back pain. The postoperative computed tomography angiography showed unobstructed ILVA and LSA, no stent stenosis and displacement, and no signs of endoleak. Conclusion: The outcome suggested that this technique might be a feasible, safe, and alternative treatment for such patients. Further studies with larger samples and longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Aortobronchial fistulas (ABFs) are rare but potentially life-threatening conditions, often presenting with haemoptysis. They can develop following various thoracic aortic conditions or procedures. Case Presentation A 70-year-old patient with a history of descending aorta replacement and ischaemic stroke presented with chest pain and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Imaging revealed a fistula between the aortic prosthesis and the lung, along with other cardiovascular abnormalities. Despite the indication for anticoagulant therapy, tranexamic acid was initiated due to bleeding risk. The patient showed clinical improvement with tranexamic acid treatment but experienced recurrence of bleeding after discontinuation. Endovascular treatment for the contained rupture at the proximal stent anastomosis was indicated. Discussion Haemoptysis is the primary symptom of ABFs, often recurring until the fistula enlarges. Postoperative aortic fistulas into the airways are uncommon and can occur years after surgery. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has become the primary treatment for high-risk patients with thoracic aortic disease. Various diagnostic modalities can visualize a fistula tract, but practical visualization is rare. Untreated ABFs invariably lead to death. Conclusion This case highlights the challenges in diagnosing and managing ABFs, emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach and regular follow-up. Patient education and prompt reporting of symptoms are essential. Early intervention upon suspicion of recurrence is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The text discusses the evaluation of custom-made thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) devices for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (unTBAD). It highlights the prevalence and challenges of unTBAD, the benefits of proactive TEVAR over medical therapy alone, and the technical considerations involved in the TEVAR procedure. The emergence of custom-made devices (CMDs) for unTBAD treatment is explored, with promising results in improving patient outcomes. Further research is needed to establish the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of CMDs compared to standard devices in managing unTBAD. [Extracted from the article]

Background: This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics, treatment approaches, and outcomes of the Stanford Type B traumatic aortic dissection (TAD) with non-traumatic aortic dissection (NTAD), and assess better management for TAD. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for Stanford type B aortic dissection at The First Hospital of China Medical University between 2014 and 2022. The patients were divided into TAD and NTAD groups based on whether they had a history of acute trauma. This study ultimately included 65 patients with TAD and 288 with NTAD. We assessed and compared the baseline characteristics, laboratory indicators, imaging features, surgical procedures, and follow-up results between the groups. Results: The TAD group was younger compared to the NTAD group (50.00 [IQR40.00–59.00] vs. 55.00 [IQR 47.00–61.00] years, p = 0.020). A lower percentage of the TAD group had a history of hypertension (20% vs. 71.18%, p < 0.001). The length of aortic dissection was shorter in the TAD group compared to the NTAD group (30.00 [IQR 22.00–40.00] vs. 344.00 [IQR 237.25–400.00] mm, p < 0.001). All patients with TAD underwent TEVAR following the same strategy as NTAD. The mean preoperative duration was 7.00 (IQR 2.00–14.00) days in the TAD group and 11.00 (IQR 8.00–15.00) days in the NTAD group (p < 0.001). TAD showed fewer complications after TEVAR in mid-to-long-term follow-up. Conclusions: TAD is distinct from NTAD. TAD typically presents with more localized lesions than NTAD, and the patients experience a shorter preoperative duration and a better mid-to-long-term outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The early survival rate of patients with acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) has improved remarkably over the past two decades. However, a false lumen may remain after proximal aortic repair and is a potential risk factor for aortic diameter enlargement, aortic rupture, and death in the chronic phase. In the stent-assisted balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination of aortic dissection (STABILISE) technique, a stent graft is implanted at the proximal part of the aortic dissection, followed by bare-metal aortic stent placement over the distal aortic dissection. Next, an aortic balloon catheter is dilated inside the stent graft and the bare stent to disrupt the intima and collapse the false lumen, immediately restoring uniluminal thoracoabdominal aortic flow. This report describes our experience with the STABILISE technique for a residual aortic dissection after an ascending aorta, and partial aortic arch replacement for acute TAAD resulted in complications. Case presentation: A 60-year-old man presented to our hospital with chest pain, paresthesia, and left lower-limb paralysis. He was diagnosed with acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) and malperfusion of the left lower limb by computed tomography (CT), and an emergent ascending aorta and partial aortic arch replacement were performed. Immediately after surgery, the left femoral arterial pulse improved, and left lower limb revascularization was deferred. The postoperative course was good; however, back pain and intermittent claudication recurred on the 9th day after surgery. A CT examination revealed persistent antegrade false lumen flow in the descending thoracic aorta through the left subclavian artery dissection and retrograde false lumen flow from the thoracoabdominal segment, resulting in aortic diameter enlargement and narrowing of the true lumen. The symptoms did not improve, and the STABILISE technique was performed on the 12th day after the initial aortic surgery. The patient's subsequent course was good; the back pain and intermittent claudication resolved. The patient was discharged on the 8th day after the STABILISE technique. Conclusions: The STABILISE technique can obliterate the false lumen and resolve symptoms associated with a residual false lumen after proximal aortic repair for acute TAAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Najuta stent-graft (Kawasumi Laboratories Inc., Tokyo, Japan) is usually easily advanced to the correct deployment position in the ascending aorta thanks to the pre-curved delivery J-sheath with all fenestrations automatically oriented towards the supra-aortic vessels. Aortic arch anatomy and delivery system stiffness could however represent limitations for proper endograft advancement, especially when the aortic arch bends sharply. The aim of this technical note is to report a series of bail-out procedures that could be useful to overcome the difficulties encountered during the Najuta stent-graft advancement up to the ascending aorta. Main body: The insertion, positioning and deployment of a Najuta stent-graft requires a through-and-through guidewire technique using a.035″ 400 cm hydrophilic nitinol guidewire (Radifocus™ Guidewire M Non-Vascular, Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with right brachial and both femoral accesses. When standard maneuver to put the endograft tip into the aortic arch, some bail-out procedures can be applied to obtain proper positioning. Five techniques are described into the text: positioning of a coaxial extra-stiff guidewire; positioning of a long introducer sheath down to the aortic root from the right brachial access; inflation of a balloon inside the ostia of the supra-aortic vessels; inflation of a balloon inside the aortic arch (coaxial to the device); and transapical access technique. This is a troubleshooting guide for allowing physicians to overcome various difficulties with the Najuta endograft as well as for other similar devices. Short conclusion: Technical issues in advancing the delivery system of Najuta stent-graft could occur. Therefore, the rescue procedures described in this technical note could be useful to guarantee the correct positioning and deployment of the stent-graft. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Acute aortic regurgitation (AR) is uncommon condition and usually results in an emergent situation because the left ventricle does not adapt quickly due to a sudden increase in end-diastolic volume caused by the regurgitant flow. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a procedure that places a stent-graft on the lesion of thoracic aorta through a minimally invasive approach. Case presentation: Here we report that a catheter-induced aortic valve injury associated with TEVAR can cause delayed AR, exemplified by the case of a patient who developed acute AR 42 months after TEVAR. For this, aortic valve replacement was performed and the patient was discharged without complications. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that when a catheter-related procedure is performed around the aortic valve, slight injury of the valve can cause aortic insufficiency even 3 years after surgery. Consequently, when performing a catheter-related procedure around the aortic valve, special attention is always required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inadvertent deployment of stent grafts into the false lumen during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is rare and is associated with catastrophic consequences. We present a case of accidental stent-graft deployment from the true lumen into the false lumen during TEVAR, resulting in hemodynamic collapse and visceral malperfusion. We successfully performed a bailout using the Brockenbrough needle to create new access from the true lumen to the false lumen and implanted another overlapping stent graft. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effect of distal aortic segmental enlargement (DASE) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for complicated type B aortic dissection (cTBAD). Materials and Methods: From March 2003 to October 2018, 814 patients with acute cTBAD from 5 medical centers were retrospectively identified. DASE is indicated as the enlargement of distal aortic segmental volume ≥1.6 fold of the preoperative volume compared with the most recent postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan. Of these patients, 635 (78%) were identified as non-DASE, and 179 (22%) were identified as DASE. Competing risk analysis was performed to compare late death and distal aortic reintervention between the groups. The morphological variables and false lumen thrombosis at 7 aortic levels were measured based on the preoperative CTA and the most recent CTA. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess the independent predictors of DASE. Results: The mean follow-up time of the entire cohort was 5.6 years (interquartile range: 2.4–8.3 years). There were total of 208 late deaths, including 94 (14.8%) deaths in non-DASE group versus 114 (63.7%) deaths in the DASE group. Distal aortic reintervention was observed in 89 patients, with 43(6.7%) in the non-DASE group versus 46 (25.7%) in the DASE group. The cumulative incidence of late death and distal aortic reintervention were significantly higher in the DASE than in the non-DASE group (p<0.001). In morphological analysis, significant incomplete false lumen thrombosis was observed in all distal aortic segments above the aortic level of celiac artery (p<0.01). According to multivariate analysis, the Marfan syndrome, stent coverage to the level of diaphragm and the level of celiac artery were independent predictors of the DASE (p<0.001). Patients with extended stent coverage to the level of celiac artery have shown a lower incidence of DASE (p<0.010). Conclusion: Compared with the non-DASE group, patients with DASE demonstrated a higher rate of late death and distal aortic reintervention. For the cTBAD population, extended stent-graft coverage to the aortic section between diaphragm and celiac artery might serve as a "cost-efficient" cutoff point aiming to reduce the risk of DASE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The management of aortic arch pathologies represents a great challenge and is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. The invasive and radical open surgical repair (OSR) is the standard of care for this group of patients. A superior endovascular approach via thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been introduced to treat arch pathologies with specifically designed endografts. This approach was shown to benefit patients who are deemed "high risk" for undergoing OSR as it is a greatly less invasiveness option and thus, yields lower rates of morbidity and mortality.Aims: This commentary aims to discuss the recent study by Tan and colleagues, which reports original data on the neurological outcomes after endovascular repair of the aortic arch using the RELAY™ Branched device.Methods: We carried out a literature search on multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Ovid, Google Scholar, Scopus, and EMBASE, to collate research evidence on the neurological outcomes of endovascular aortic arch repair with TEVAR.Results: Tan and colleagues showed through their original clinical data that the RELAY™ Branched device has a high rate of technical success and favorable neurological outcomes. There were no reported neurological deficits in patients who received the triple-branched RELAY™ Branched device.Conclusion: The RELAY™ branched endograft is well-established for candidates for aortic arch endovascular repair with favorable neurological outcomes. Multiple considerations can help control the incidence of stroke following endovascular repair. These include optimization of the supra-aortic vessels' revascularization, weighting the embolic risk in patients with atheromatous disease, and careful preoperative assessment to select the best candidates for arch endovascular repair. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

‐Aortic dissection of descending aorta was detected by intraoperative TEE in a case of 67‐year‐old man with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis after TAVR. ‐Transesophageal echocardiogram after TAVR procedure is helpful to detect this rare complication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and aortic remodelling rates following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute or subacute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) based on technique. Material and Methods: All TEVARs for acute/subacute TBAD between 01/01/2008 and 01/06/2020 were included. TEVARS were grouped by technique (TEVAR only, PETTICOAT and STABILISE). Aortic remodelling was assessed at three aortic levels on follow-up CT. Thirty-day technical/clinical success rates, re-intervention rates and complications were recorded. Results: A total of 29 patients were included. The median age was 55 years (31–82). The median duration from initial presentation to TEVAR was 7 days (0–84). Intra-procedural complications included one aortic rupture from balloon moulding in a STABILISE case. Thirty-day mortality, stroke, spinal cord ischaemia and visceral ischaemia were 3% (n = 1), 3% (n = 1), 3% (n = 1) and 3% (n = 1), respectively. (All occurred in acute TBAD.) Overall survival was 50.5 months (18–115). Median follow-up was 31 months (1–115). Six patients (21%) required re-intervention, with a median time of 5 months (5–46) from first TEVAR. Overall complete aortic remodelling rates were: 89% at the proximal descending thoracic aorta, 78% at the distal thoracic aorta and 50% at the infra-renal abdominal aorta. At the infra-renal aorta, the STABILISE group (n = 11) had a higher complete aortic remodelling rate (82%) compared to TEVAR alone (n = 12) (20%). Conclusion: Endovascular intervention for acute and subacute TBAD is safe with a high rate of technical success. STABILISE results in higher aortic remodelling at the infra-renal aorta (82%) compared to TEVAR alone (20%) but risks aortic rupture from balloon moulding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Existing hemodynamic studies on aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) apply geometric simplifications. This study aims to evaluate the necessity of more accurate geometries at the proximal landing zone in computational fluid dynamic (CFD) studies. Methods: Three patient-specific 3D aortic dissection models with different geometric accuracies at the proximal landing zone were manually fabricated for CFD simulations: (i) model 1 without the stent graft (SG), (ii) model 2 with the metal stent, and (iii) model 3 with the SG. The flow distribution, flow pattern, and wall shear stress (WSS)-related indicators in these three models were compared. Results: The flow distributions were quite similar for the three models, with a maximum absolute difference of 0.27% at the left suclavian artery (LSA) between models 1 and 3 because of partial coverage. A more chaotic flow pattern was observed at the proximal landing zone in model 3, with significant regional differences in the WSS-related indicator distributions. The upstream and downstream WSS-related indicator distributions were quite similar for the three models. Conclusions: The flow pattern and hemodynamic parameter distributions were affected by the geometric accuracy only in a small region near the proximal landing zone. The flow split was hardly affected by the LSA partial coverage, indicating that the coverage may have slight effects on short-term blood perfusion. However, this conclusion needs to be verified in future studies with larger sample sizes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A case of a 46-year-old car driver struck with great force by a tram through the driver's door is presented. The main trauma consisted in chest injury with multi-rib fracture along with rupture and dissection of the thoracic aorta. Immediate medical rescue actions consisted only in procedures necessary to support vital functions; the patient survived owing to being promptly transported to the Emergency Department to undergo thoracotomy and laparotomy with massive blood transfusion. Polytrauma angio-CT scan revealed a posttraumatic thoracic aorta lesion which in turn was treated by deployment of an endovascular thoracic stent graft. This way, the immediate risk of death was averted, and the remaining traumatic lesions and conditions could be treated. Patient was discharged to a Rehabilitation Center on the 49th day of treatment. The authors stress that trauma resulting from accidents with this particular mechanism, i.e. lateral car crash on the driver's side with the driver's door being staved in by the tram, should be managed by immediate transport of the patient to the Emergency Center. In such cases early drainage of the pleural cavity can deteriorate patient's status by increasing the bleeding from the ruptured aorta. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has emerged as the surgical treatment of choice for patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm. This article focuses on the indications, contraindications, diagnostic studies, procedure, complications, nursing considerations, and patient discharge instructions for patients undergoing a TEVAR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Regarding the incidence of surgical procedures between different races, Best et al.7 found that the national incidence rate of nine major surgical procedures was higher among White patients than Black patients. In this regard, the present study leans heavily towards analyzation of the effects of certain social affairs rather than clinical or anatomical differences that may cause differences in outcomes of aortic disease treated with TEVAR. Keywords: ethnicity; in-hospital mortality; race; thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) EN ethnicity in-hospital mortality race thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) 2324 2325 2 07/05/22 20220801 NES 220801 I I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal." i - Martin Luther King Jr. (1963) Since the arousing first sentence of his famous speech at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., great efforts have been made by worldwide human communities to combat inequalities of opportunities between people of different races and socioeconomic backgrounds. [Extracted from the article]

Copyright of Anaesthesist is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

A type B dissection involves the aorta distal to the subclavian artery, and accounts for 25–40% of aortic dissections. Approximately 75% of these are uncomplicated with no malperfusion or ischemia. Multiple consensus statements recommend thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) as the treatment of choice for acute complicated type B aortic dissections, while uncomplicated type B dissections are traditionally treated with medical management alone, including strict blood pressure control, as open repairs have a prohibitively high morbidity of up to 31%. However, with medical treatment alone, the morbidity, including aneurysm degeneration of the affected segment, is 30%, and mortality is 10% over 5 years. For both chronic and acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissections, emerging evidence supports the use of both best medical therapy and TEVAR. This paper reviews the current diagnosis and treatment of uncomplicated type B aortic dissections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 65-year-old man reported nausea and anorexia after falling down a flight of stairs. Computed tomography (CT) showed a ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm, and emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed. However, after resuming food intake, the patient developed a fever. CT scan showed severe pneumomediastinum and a mediastinal abscess, and the patient was diagnosed with esophageal perforation. Emergency esophagectomy was performed, with an esophageal fistula made at the cervix. Jejunostomy was then performed to enable enteral nutrition. Histological examination showed substantial necrosis at the middle intrathoracic esophagus, and the patient was diagnosed with esophageal necrosis leading to perforation. Five months after the esophagectomy, gastric conduit reconstruction through the retrosternal route was performed. The patient was able to resume food intake, and survived more than 1 year after this surgery. Here, we describe the successful management of this rare case of esophageal necrosis after TEVAR for ruptured traumatic aortic aneurysm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The development fistulas between the thoracic aorta and the esophagus are highly fatal conditions. We aimed to identify a therapeutic strategy for treating aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) in this study, by investigating all AEF cases presented in this special symposium at the 65th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Methods: Forty-seven AEF patients were included in this study. The survivors and nonsurvivors at six and 18 months after diagnosis of AEF were classified into 'Group A6', 'Group D6', 'Group A18', and 'Group D18', respectively. Comparisons between Group A6 and Group D6 and between Group A18 and Group D18 were made with regard to therapeutic strategy. Results: Twenty-two (46.8 %) and 33 (70.3 %) of the 47 patients died within 6 and 18 months, respectively. The patients treated with omentum wrapping ( p = 0.0052), esophagectomy ( p = 0.0269) and a graft replacement strategy for the aorta ( p = 0.002) were more frequently included in Group A6. The patients with the omentum wrapping ( p = 0.0174) and esophagectomy ( p = 0.0203) and graft replacement were more significantly included in Group A18. The results of the multivariate analysis indicated that the mortality rate at 6 and 18 months after diagnosis was significantly correlated with graft replacement ( p = 0.0188) and esophagectomy ( p = 0.0257), respectively. There were significant differences in the actuarial survival curves in patients who had omentum wrapping, graft replacement, and esophagectomy compared to patients who did not have these 3 therapeutic procedures. Conclusion: The use of thoracic endovascular aortic repair alone for AEF should not be considered a definitive surgery. In contrast, esophagectomy, open surgery with aortic replacement using prostheses and homografts and greater omentum wrapping significantly improve the mid-term survival of AEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Conventional endovascular therapy of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with involving visceral and renal arteries is limited by the absence of a landing zone for the aortic endograft. Solutions have been proposed to overcome the problem of no landing zone; however, most of them are not feasible in urgent and high-risk patients. We describe a case that was successfully treated by total endovascular technique with a two-by-two chimney-and-periscope approach in a patient with acute symptomatic type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with supra-anastomotic aneurysm formation involving the renal and visceral arteries and a pseduaneurismatic sac localized in the left ileopsoas muscle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aims to identify independent factors correlating to an increased risk of perioperative stroke during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods: A prospective maintained TEVAR database, medical records, and imaging studies of 300 patients (205 men; median age of all, 66 years, range 21-89), who underwent TEVAR between March 1997 and February 2011, were reviewed. Preoperative CT data sets were reviewed by two experienced radiologists with focus on the atheroma burden in the aortic arch (grade I, normal, to grade V, ulcerated or pedunculated atheroma). Aortic arch geometry (arch types I-III) was documented. Further parameters included in the univariate analysis were age, gender, urgency of repair, duration of procedure, adenosine-induced cardiac arrest or rapid pacing, proximal landing zone, left subclavian artery (LSA) coverage, and number of stent grafts. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the independent correlations of potential risk factors. Results: Atherosclerotic aneurysm was the most common pathology (44 %). One hundred and fifty-four of our patients (51 %) were treated under urgent or emergent conditions. Seventeen percent of all patients had significant arch atheroma (grade IV or V), and 43 % had a steep type III aortic arch. The perioperative stroke was 4 % (12 patients; median age, 73 years, range 31-78). Two strokes were lethal (0.7 %). All strokes were classified as embolic based on imaging characteristics. In eight patients, strokes were located in the left cerebral hemisphere (seven of them in the anterior and one in the posterior circulation). Four stroke patients (one in the left posterior circulation) underwent LSA coverage without revascularization. Three stroke patients had severe arch atheroma grade V. Five patients suffering stroke were recognized to have a type III aortic arch. Strokes were equally distributed between zones 0-2 vs. 3-4 ( n = 6 each, 5 vs. 3.3 %). The highest incidence was found in zone 1 (11.4 %). In univariate analysis, grade V arch atheroma (odds ratios (OR), 5.35; 95 % confidence intervals (CI), 1.00-25.87; P = 0.035) and zone 1 deployment (OR, 5.03; 95 % CI, 1.19-20.03; P = 0.021) were significantly associated with perioperative stroke. In multivariate analysis, both parameters were confirmed as independent significant risk factors for stroke during TEVAR. Conclusions: Stroke risk during TEVAR is directly associated with the atheroma burden of the aortic arch and the proximal landing zone. These factors should be considered during patient selection, planning, and implantation strategies of TEVAR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Gefaesschirurgie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Traumatic aortic arch rupture with pseudoaneurysm is a rare high fatal injury. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair(TEVAR) is widely used in the treatment of aortic diseases. However a unified traumatic aortic injury risk stratification tool still lacks. The patients' disease assessment and operation method still rely on the doctors' subjective anticipation of disease and surgical results.Case Presentation: A 31-year-old male presented with chest pain and hoarseness of recent onset. Imageological examination showed aortic rupture with mediastinal pseudoaneurysm in Zone 1. Debranching + TEVAR hybrid operation was considered: Using artificial blood vessels rebuild the arch branches, the covered stent was placed in aortic arch for endovascular repair via femoral artery. The follow-up was good in postoperative 7d, 1 year and > 2 years.Conclusion: The traumatic aortic arch rupture with pseudoaneurysm treated by Debranching+TEVAR hybrid operation is feasible. The short-term and medium-term follow-up results are satisfactory. For traumatic aortic arch injury, hybrid operation is recommended to reduce the risk of cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermia circulatory arrest under no open operation conditions or emergency situation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Aorta-esophageal fistula (AEF) is very dangerous with high mortality. Treatment is difficult because of hemorrhagic shock in acute stage and infection in sub-acute stage. We develop a method to manage both perforations from aorta and esophagus successfully. Methods A 56 male patient had fish bone incarcerated in thoracic esophagus. Two months after this accident, intermittent massive hematemesis occurred. The esophagoscopy displayed active bleeding and AEF was diagnosed by computed tomography angiography (CTA). TEVAR is applied immediately and stopped bleeding successfully. Fever with sepsis and mediastinitis was happened after oral intake. The perforated esophagus was removed by wire-stripper through neck and abdomen incisions and reconstructed with gastric tube via retro-sternal route. Results After subtotal esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction, the ventilator is weaned and endotracheal tube was removed. No leakage from anastomosis between cervical esophagus and gastric tube. Patient could swallow regular diet smoothly. No further post-operative complication was happened after follow up two years. Conclusion TEVAR is the first step in managing AEF in acute stage to prevent hemorrhagic shock. Although esophageal perforation could be managed with esophageal stent, the marginal ulcer with pain and bleeding may cause other side effects. Esophageal stent is also another contra-indication applied in benign disease. Subtotal esophagectomy with wire-stripper and reconstruction with gastric tube could provide definite treatment for this esophageal perforation. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]