Search

Hohfeld was acutely aware of the 'potent tendency [of words] to control thought'. He was perhaps less aware of the power of syntax to do the same. Hohfeld's tendency to express the content of duties and liberties in the syntactically restrictive to ϕ form has allowed a corrupted version of his analytical scheme to take root. That version takes as axiomatic that the content of any duty or liberty is the action or inaction of the duty bearer or liberty holder. Yet duties and liberties can (and do) pertain to matters other than the action or inaction of the duty bearer or liberty holder. This insight has a range of doctrinal implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article provides a critical review of the sources of Roman law regarding negative obligations. The author indicates that in the classical definition of the content of the obligation of the Roman jurist Paul (D. 44.7.3 pr., Paulus 2 inst.) the concept of «abstaining from actions» is absent, but the same Paul indicates that the concept of «doing» (facere ) includes also «to abstain» (abstinere) (D. 50.16.189, Paulus 34 ad ed). Therefore, it can be stated that obligations with a negative content were recognized in classical Roman law. However, the author emphasized that negative obligations in Roman law, as a rule, did not have an independent meaning, but appeared in additional conditions to the main contractual obligation and were not typical. As typical obligations, the article analyzes the agreement on non-alienation (pactum de non alienando), the agreement on not filing a lawsuit (pactum de non petendo) and the agreement on not providing a guarantee for eviction (pactum de non praestanda evictione). In Roman law, the non-alienation agreement mostly accompanied sales or pledge relations. Moreover, the violation of the non-alienation agreement did not result in the invalidity of the sale. The sale of the subject of pledge carried out under prohibition resulted only in the liability of the party who committed such a violation. In modern law, the agreement on non-alienation of the subject of the pledge has been transformed into a legal prohibition of the alienation of the pledged property without the consent of the pledgee. A non-suit agreement was an informal agreement under which the creditor undertook not to file a claim against the debtor at all or for a certain period of time in the event of his non-fulfillment of the obligation. Violation of this agreement had only a procedural effect: the defendant could raise a procedural objection (exceptio) that an agreement not to file a lawsuit had taken place. The agreement on not providing a guarantee for eviction reduced the responsibility of the debtorseller for seizing of the thing from the buyer on the grounds that had existed before its sale. According to the claim from the purchase, in case of eviction of the thing from the buyer, the seller had to be liable in the amount of damages. In case of concluding an agreement not to provide a guarantee for eviction, the seller was liable only in the amount of the purchase price of the item. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper traces the history of remoteness in contract law, namely the legal formants (in Rodolfo Sacco's terms) constraining the availability of contract damages in various legal systems. Our journey takes us through different times, continents and cultures, from the eighteenth century to the twenty–first century, across the law of France, United States, England and Wales, India and Australia, among other jurisdictions. While it might seem that civilian and common law traditions have very different morphological legal forms, once a closer historical, cultural, and anthropological gaze is turned upon the legal formants involved, it can be seen that remoteness discloses a shared concern which may be common to many human societies and cultures. In other words, as a matter of social experience, humans who enter into transactions generally realise that it is impossible to know the future, or to know what all outcomes of the transaction will be. Consequently, it is recognised that it would be unfair and unjust to hold a defendant liable for all outcomes, and as our journey will show, legal systems seek guidance from other legal systems in their efforts to deal with this problem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This short piece introduces a working game designed for legal problem solving where students use LEGO® to create visual representations of legal analysis. We explain its structure and rationale which is based on the LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® method and our own five-stage guided approach to problem solving in contract law. We comment on LEGO® models built by students during workshops exploring issues in contract law. In their feedback, students reported that the method helped them to understand contract law doctrine, navigate problem questions and think about their analysis of legal issues. We suggest that, with further investigation, the method can be a viable pedagogical technique to assist with the identification and understanding of a wide range of legal information, and to discern relevant connections between doctrine and fact patterns to achieve successful abstraction, application, and ultimately the construction of complex legal analysis. The method also builds confidence, social interaction skills and reinforces competence in legal problem solving. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Law / Teise is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Contracts alter legal relationships between parties based on mutual agreement and law. One of the most significant impacts of ownership transfer contracts is immediate transfer of ownership to the other party. However, in a few exceptional cases, such as suspended conditions, time options and conditional sales, the transfer of ownership begins but remains fragile and unstable. The unique nature of legal relationships in these cases requires individual analysis. Ownership should not be disregarded, and despite its instability, ownership and its benefits must be explained clearly. This article examines instances of unstable ownership in Imami jurisprudence and Iranian law. The article argues that the creation of an unstable contract in this form is conceivable and in accordance with the rules. However, the effects of unstable status of a contract depend on the nature of each contract and its instability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Real servitudes are property rights in foreigners' things (iura in re aliena), in which the titleholder uses others' property to benefit his property. This research aims to analyse the creation of the right of real servitude based on contract as legal title. The analysis specifically examines the provisions of the law of property and other real rights of Kosovo no. 57/2009 and the law on obligation relations of Kosovo no. 16/2012 that do not provide enough specification and clarifications for the content and this type of contract. The isolated analysis only in the provisions of Kosovo law is insufficient for clarification without comparison with the legislation of other countries. Therefore, the Kosovo law is compared with the civil codes of France, Austria, and Germany, aiming to identify similarities, differences, and legal concepts. The work is based on a literature review and normative, comparative, and empirical methods. The research results answer the questions related to the content, form, and type of the contract as a legal title. It shows that Kosovo law, even though it has some similarities with the French civil code when it comes to the conditions of the valid contract, however Kosovo law differs as follows: a) the contract is not the only condition for acquiring the right of real servitude, but the registration is also needed, b) the content of contract must be based on the interaction of provisions of the law on property and the law on obligation relations, c) the same contract is obligation relationship in nature, but it also serves for the transfer of right and registration of the real servitudes. In this sense, it is concluded that Kosovo law is closer to the Austrian Civil Code and German Civil Code. However, it is not a pure German legal concept since it requires two contracts: a contract of obligation and a contract of transfer of real rights. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of AIS: Ars Iuris Salmanticensis is the property of Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Contract law was one of the main subjects discussed in the early modern legal genre of differentiae iuris civilis et canonici ('differences between civil and canon law'). Similar topics were covered in both late medieval and early modern differentiae – hence this genre offers a good opportunity for comparative historical research dedicated to selected topics of contract law (such as those discussed here: the actionability of bare agreements, stipulation for the benefit of a third party, overreaching in contract formation and the lease of a house to a scholar). An examination of the sources proves that the authors of early modern differentiae applied the comparative method in their works. This involved the presentation of sources and rationales from the two bodies of law, the interpretation of sources and arguments in favour of the solutions offered, references to the then-current legal literature and practice and most importantly the preferred method of reconciliation for conflicting laws. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Taking inequality as a key challenge of our time, this article aims to highlight consumer markets, and their underpinning legal ground rules, as important contributors to inequitable wealth distributions. It illustrates how product design, as manifested in contractual terms, can allow firms to evade competition and divert resources upwards along society's wealth distribution curve. It then highlights the contestable legality of certain pricing practices, such as 'contingent charges', and the challenge they pose to fundamental principles of contract law. An in-depth view of the 2015 case of Beavis v ParkingEye argues that the UK Supreme Court has validated contingent pricing models in a manner unsupported by traditional contractual reasoning and unjustified by contemporary market failure analysis. The article asks contract law to confront the reality that it shapes market distributions in economically and politically significant ways, and appeals for greater scrutiny of the contribution of contract law adjudication to inequality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Adab Al-Kufa is the property of Republic of Iraq Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research (MOHESR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In today's world, the speed and efficiency of resolving disputes in the field of contract law are of great importance for businesses and individual participants. Traditional litigation is often notorious for its length and high costs. In this regard, alternative methods, such as mediation and arbitration, are gaining more and more popularity. Their advantages, such as speed, confidentiality, and greater party autonomy, make them attractive for the resolution of contractual disputes. The article explores alternative dispute resolution methods in the field of contract law, including mediation, arbitration, and confidential settlement. The purpose of the study is to analyze alternative ways of resolving disputes in the field of contract law. Research methodology includes such methods as empirical method, comparative analysis method, forecasting method, and logical methods. As a result of the study, alternative ways of resolving disputes in the field of contract law and the advantages of each method compared to traditional court proceedings are considered and also provide examples of successful application in practice. The results of the study show that alternative dispute resolution methods in the field of contract law, such as mediation, arbitration, and confidential settlement, have some significant advantages compared to traditional litigation. In addition, current trends in the use of these alternative methods in modern contract law are investigated. The study also indicates that the success of these alternative dispute resolution methods in the field of contract law depends on mutual trust between the parties, who are ready to work together to achieve a mutually beneficial resolution of the conflict. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article explores the concept of hybridization in insurance contract law, specifically focusing on the regulatory framework for insurance contracts in Serbia. The authors argue that the current unified regime for insurance contracts is inadequate and fails to protect the interests of consumers. They suggest that insurance contract law should be regulated separately from general contract law and should include provisions that guarantee additional protection for consumers. The article also discusses the importance of market conduct rules in ensuring fair practices in the insurance industry. Additionally, the article provides a list of references and citations from various sources that cover different aspects of insurance contracts and consumer protection, making them valuable resources for researchers in this field. [Extracted from the article]

This article aims to highlight the phenomenon of hybridization of insurance contract law, which started with its emancipation from contract law. The next phase included its internal stratification, stemming from obvious differences between commercial and consumer insurance, and various contractual positions of contracting parties in these different insurance contracts. Two features of insurance contracts regulation are addressed, based on Serbian law as it currently stands, as well as comparative legal analysis. The first feature is that the legislatively envisaged unified regime for insurance contracts is incomplete and inadequate for all manifestations of this contract. The second feature is that regulation of this matter must enable balancing of interests between insurers and insureds, especially consumers. The authors conclude that insurance regulation can only be conducive when simultaneously ensuring protection of the weaker party, protecting insurers from the negligent actions of the insured, while facilitating conduct of insurance business. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Jurisprudence (1802-3843) is the property of Wolters Kluwer Czech Republic and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Law and economics scholarship has traditionally analyzed efficient breach cases monolithically. By grouping efficient breach cases together, this literature treats the subjective motives and the distributive effects of the breach as immaterial. The Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment introduced a distinction based on the intent and the effects of the breach, allowing courts to use disgorgement remedies in cases of 'opportunistic' breach of contract (i.e., 'deliberate and profitable' breaches). In this article, we evaluate this approach, focusing on the effects of disgorgement remedies on allocative and productive efficiency, information-forcing and competitive effects, and restraint of breach-searching incentives. We show that, even from a purely consequentialist perspective, disgorgement remedies may be normatively warranted, especially when involving sellers' breach. Recent experimental evidence revealed that the preferences and reactions of ordinary people are in line with our evaluation of the effects of opportunistic breach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In 2022, UNCITRAL Working Group IV was mandated to develop the Rules on data provision contracts as an answer to the needs of rapidly growing data market. It was expressly noted then, that the Working Group IV should be mindful of similar legislative initiatives. In October of 2023, the working version of the Rules was distributed. Among the other provisions, the Rules define a data provision contract as a contract under which one party provides data to other party. Given definition shows a great resemblance with the contracts on the supply of digital content regulated by Directive (EU) 2019/770 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content and digital services. This paper analyzes and compares some of the key provisions of the aforementioned legal instruments. Special focus is attached to the scopes of application of both instruments and exclusions from their application, legal nature and general characteristics of both data provision contracts and contracts for the supply of digital content, obligations of the contractual parties. The main objective is to establish clear boundaries regarding the objects and scopes of application of both legal instruments in order to determine their potential overlaps. Finally, the paper investigates the reach and the meaning of personal data provision as a sui generis reimbursement in the context of both instruments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Themis: Revista de Derecho is the property of Themis Asociacion and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Environmental & Social Management Journal / Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental is the property of Environmental & Social Management Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The study explores the unification of private international law and substantive contract law in the field of international sales law. It starts by asking whether the instruments of uniform substantive contract law can fully replace the rules of private international law, as well as if different periods be distinguished: can it be said that, at first, private international law played the decisive role in the settlement of international commercial disputes, followed by the law of traders, the Lex Mercatoria, and then by uniform norms of substantive law? Or is the relationship more sophisticated, because different gates open between the instruments of substantive law and conflict of laws? Can private international law eventually play a role in determining the application of substantive law conventions or in filling gaps in the uniform law? In the second part of the paper, several examples demonstrate that the unification of substantive law and private international law does not exclude or make each other superfluous; they live in a multifaceted relationship, besides competing as part of their long-lasting coexistence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Jurídica (0103-3506) is the property of Revista Juridica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

We provide (1) an overview of various present and future applications of smart contracts across various industries including real estate, finance, and healthcare and (2) an assessment of the efficacy of smart contracts as a means of replacing or supplementing traditional contracts. Disclosed in this paper are (1) present and future applications of smart contracts and potential risks and downsides, and (2) legal considerations when using smart contracts to replace or supplement traditional contracts. Aspects of blockchain technologies can be applied to traditional contracts, in part or in whole, to reduce common challenges associated with contracts. Specifically, smart contracts can be integrated with or replace traditional contracts with the benefit of ensuring reciprocal obligations are enforced and aid in ensuring mutual consent, offer and acceptance, consideration and legal purpose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of European Review of Contract Law is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Jurnal Locus: Penelitian dan Pengabdian is the property of Riviera Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The relevance of the research lies in the study and analysis of the impact of recodification on contract law and the determination of its future prospects. Recodification, which involves a systematic revision and unification of legislation, is necessary in connection with globalization, the development of electronic commerce, and new technologies. The change in social values also creates a need to revise the legal frame, in particular in the protection of consumer rights and compliance with ethical norms. The study proposes to identify problems, propose rational solutions, and contribute to forecasting the future development of the relevant field of law. The purpose of the study is to study the impact of the recodification process on the modern system of contract law and to determine the prospects for its development in the future. The methodological basis of the research is based on a combination of various scientific approaches and methods that allow for a comprehensive and comprehensive analysis of the research subject. Some of the main methodological approaches that can be used in this work include comparative analysis, legal analysis, empirical research methods, theoretical analysis, and historical analysis. Actual problems and challenges faced by the modern system of positive law are identified; the advantages and disadvantages of various models of recodification and their impact on the modernity of the researched field are clarified; an idea was obtained about the possible directions of the development of contract law, in particular regarding unification and harmonization, protection of consumer rights and consideration of ethical norms; recommendations and proposals for improving relevant legal norms in the context of recodification are formulated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In contemporary business relations, the possibility for one party to a contract to transfer all of its rights and obligations under the contract to a third party by way of a voluntary act is of great utility. While the possibility to do this generally exists in jurisdictions across Europe, the rules by which it must be done can differ under the relevant national laws, not to mention the fact that a specific legal regime is not articulated in most civil codes. Against this background, this paper compares the approaches taken in Italian law and the uniform rules elaborated at an international level in the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Intellectual Property / Dusevne Vlastnictvo is the property of Industrial Property Office of the Slovak Republic and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Via Inveniendi et Iudicandi is the property of Universidad Santo Tomas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista do Centro Acadêmico Afonso Pena (CAAP Journal) is the property of Revista do Centro Academico Afonso Pena/CAAP Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Retaining Contractual Equilibrium through the Doctrine of Change of Circumstances: What Can Be Learned from Chinese Experiences? By carrying out a large-scale investigation of judicial decisions delivered from 2009 to April 2023, this article analyses and presents Chinese experiences in retaining contractual equilibrium through the doctrine of change of circumstances. They include the judiciary's three-step analytical framework based on the shared assumption theory and the contractual equilibrium theory, categorisation of the disrupted contractual equilibrium caused by a change of circumstance, and elaboration on the relationships between the three doctrines regarding unexpected circumstances (i.e. the doctrine of change of circumstances, the doctrine of frustration of the purpose of the contract and the doctrine of force majeure) under Chinese contract law. This article, for the first time, systemically elaborates on the Chinese judicial analytical approaches in applying the doctrine of change of circumstances through a large-scale investigation of judicial decisions and clearly shows the doctrine's distinct role in the context of unexpected circumstances. The discussions help to gain a deep understanding of the application of the Chinese doctrine of change of circumstances in real life and are of great value for nourishing the comparative law discourse of the rules of unexpected circumstances. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Frustration Doctrine and Leases: Lessons from the Hong Kong COVID-19 Litigation Despite the immense impact of COVID-19 on the business environment, the Hong Kong (HK) courts did not find room for the operation of the frustration doctrine. While all the reported HK cases involved leases, they offer valuable lessons on the theoretical basis of frustration and how the 'radical change in nature of obligations' test is critically concerned with characterising the nature of the bargain. Beyond their precedential value, the decisions point to the limits of contractual construction and the need to recognise the role of legal policy in exercising what is in effect judicial risk allocation when applying the doctrine of frustration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Artificial Intelligence, Neuroscience and Emotional Data. What Role for Private Autonomy in the Digital Market?: Within the context of mass production, consumers represent a vulnerable category since they are the weaker contracting party due to the existing information asymmetry between companies and customers. Moreover, consumers suffer from new forms of vulnerability due to the combination of new technological phenomena – such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Big Data – and the latest findings in neuroscience, which allows businesses to have a monopoly on the newly acquired knowledge on consumers' purchase decision-making. This article aims at analysing the new technological trends in digital marketing that show the increasing role of 'AI emotional marketing' as a tool to access the inner and unconscious layers of consumers' mind to redirect their economic choices. In this respect, the article will focus on the legal notion of 'autonomy' within the EU legislation on consumer protection and contract law, in order to investigate whether the current legal framework is well equipped to counteract the new form of algorithmic manipulation in the digital market. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article I analyze Kar and Radin's critique of boilerplate text in contract. The problems identified in boilerplate are significant. I then describe the test that they offer to distinguish between proper contract and "pseudo-contract" in boilerplate. The test is constructed upon the use of Gricean Maxims slightly modified for the context of contract law. Next, Karl Llewellyn's test for boilerplate is described. Ultimately, through the use of a couple of examples it is argued that Llewellyn's test is a better option. Even with this result, much of the Kar and Radin critique of boilerplate is significant and valuable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Epicurus holds, in Key Doctrine 31, that what is just according to nature is a súmbolon or sign of the interest there is in neither harming one another nor being harmed. Certain readings of this maxim equivocate this legal sign with other signs found in nature, thereby failing to give sufficient weight to the role of reciprocity in its production. Other readings simply import a legal sense from outside of Epicurean doctrine, thereby failing to explain what makes Epicurean súmbola legal. A final set of readings attempt to find a legal rule as a kind of innate concept or Kantian 'scheme'. This article identifies new sources for understanding súmbolon, drawn principally but not exclusively from Aristotle's Eudemian Ethics. This article offers an original argument that Epicurus adopts Aristotle's' image of the tally stick (symbolon) as a meeting of often divergent interests which constitutes something new and particularly valuable to the Epicurean: friendship. A theoretical argument is also advanced to support this reading which claims that one person's reflection on a 'divine image' of the end (telos) is insufficient to constitute a súmbolon; rather real (as opposed to abstract or ideal) individual interests are filtered via the mechanism of the tally, that is via the meeting of two given individuals who together generate a sign (symbolon) of reciprocal interest in neither harming nor being harmed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Principles of Asian Contract Law (PACL) are the most recent addition to the series of uniform laws regarding transnational commercial contracts. This time, the harmonization initiative must address the problem of a great variety of legal traditions, all of which are quite difficult to reconcile. The author focuses on the object and objectives of the PACL by reconsidering the notion of "Asian law" and the alleged cultural neutrality of contract law as a legal discipline. The paper argues that the PACL project lacks clarity. Its ambitious objectives, while apparently intelligible, fail to produce the desired results in their entirety: the Asian regional harmonization of contract law turns out to resemble its occidental forerunners. The study goes beyond the traditional comparative law. It explores the model law (in the making) in a broader context of legal policy, parallel regional private-law-making efforts in the field of contract law as well as in the context of legal globalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article articulates a theory of relational contract, as an alternative to traditional freedom of contract philosophy. The law has moved away from freedom of contract to some extent, and it can be criticised on the basis of its unrealistic assumptions and detachment from the typical reality of parties' contracting. Relational contract theory is a possible suitable alternative theoretical framework. It may be useful in relation to contract interpretation. Specifically, it can be utilised to support a broader approach to contract interpretation, with the court focussing on the entirety of the parties' relations, including the written terms and also subsequent performance. It enjoys some support in the United Kingdom and in other common law jurisdictions. It can support the view taken by two justices of the High Court of Australia in a recent contract interpretation decision involving employment contracts. The article favours the approach taken by these justices, rather than that of the majority, whose judgment reflects classic contract law sentiments at odds with the general direction of contract law in comparative jurisdictions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Taiwan Law Review is the property of Angle Publishing Co., Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In the last 10 years the blockchain technology has become mainstream research topic because of its features that offers, as: decentralized system, peer to peer (P2P) transaction, distributed consensus, and anonymity properties. Also, the blockchain technology overshadows regulatory problem and technical challenges and one of the opportunities that offers the blockchain technology is the 'smart contract'. A smart contract is a set of programs that can be much better from the traditional contracts for some features which are self-verifying, self-executing and tamper resistant. Also, smart contract with the integration of blockchain technology without which cannot function, is capable of doing a task in real time with very low cost and provide a greater degree of high security level. The aim of this paper is to explain the concept of the smart contract and its components and function. The paper is aimed at presenting the issue of smart contract, blockchain technology. The specific focus was on the application of smart contracts in real estate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Participants in obligations are obliged in the legal transaction to comply with good business practices. On obligations, apply customs and usage if the participants in the obligatory relationship arranged their application or if it appears from the circumstances that they wanted their application. Starting from that, codification and harmonization of law are inevitably related to a comprehensive procedure, the aim is to create a system of commonly agreed upon principles and regulations for contract law at a national level. Moreover modern contract law emphasizes the importance of faith. Parties are expected to act fairly towards each other during all stages of contracting. From negotiation to performance. Fostering trust and cooperation. Lastly contemporary contract law recognizes remedies for breach of contract. When one party fails to fulfill their obligations without justification remedies such as damages or specific performance may be sought by the aggrieved party. These principles form a foundation for contract law by establishing guidelines for fair and enforceable agreements between parties, in various commercial transactions. Barriers that seem to impede the seamless flow of transactions will be eliminated through the establishment and acceptance of harmonized regulations governing contracts, thereby enhancing legal doctrine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The full-scale invasion of Ukraine and crimes against humanity accompanying it have been fuelled by the mass spread of fakes and hatred incitements, forcing the largest online platforms to review and strengthen their content moderation policies. However, the approaches taken by platforms have not been perfect, and some of them could even exacerbate the situation. All in all, this is another evidence of the need to develop mechanisms being able to cope with the challenges to online speech and safety caused by dramatic social events. Basic approaches to address content moderation issues developed by now are self-(co-) and state regulation, on the one hand, and contract and human rights law, on the other. However, neither of them taken separately can ensure the needed level of protection of human rights online. Thus, in this article the ways to combine and improve these approaches are proposed. On the one hand, there is a need to dwell on private law mechanisms allowing to ensure the protection of human rights by virtue of judgements in private disputes. On the other hand, state regulation should be improved by international instruments allowing to provide for a uniform approach to regulation at a global scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Contract terms can be express or implied. But what does that mean? I argue that the distinction can be illuminated by reference to the philosophy of language. Express terms are best understood by reference to the truth-conditional content of the parties' agreement; implied terms are derived from express terms by a process of reasoning, albeit one aimed at establishing the parties' commitments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Covid-19 pandemic led to a surge in the use of video-conferencing services offered by Zoom, which has continued in post-pandemic times. This paper sheds light on Zoom's contractual terms related to governing law and jurisdiction, and its applicability in Emirate and French laws. It attempts to answer the question about the circumstances in which the local courts will take jurisdiction over a dispute, notwithstanding that the parties agree that such disputes will be resolved in the jurisdiction stated in the clause. It also provides an analysis of the exclusion and limitation of Zoom's liability clause. Specifically, it looks at the effectiveness of the limitation of Zoom's liability in Emirate and French laws. The study emphasizes the need for policy and legislative framework to address this new area of law and technology to protect users from contractual terms in e-services agreements since video conferencing services continue to thrive and drive growth in the post-pandemic world. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Negotiation features in Contract Law in numerous guises. (1) Courts recognise that negotiation may precede agreement (2) Courts will enforce agreements made after a negotiation process where parties intended to enter into legally binding arrangements (3) Courts decline to construe the contract by interrogation of the negotiations which led up to the point of agreement (4) A Court may create imaginary negotiation evidence, gleaning this from a Court simulated negotiation between hypothetical parties to the actual agreement (5) In the event of a breach of contract, a party may establish that the breaching party had actual knowledge of a state of affairs that might be a not improbable result of that breach. That actual knowledge will almost certainly have been created or transferred during negotiations. In this note, I argue that the principles of construction at 3 and 5 above are manifestly mutually incompatible. The logic of my argument is that reconsideration of the exclusionary rule is merited, particularly in the light of multiple exceptions and given the fact that Judges routinely deal with evidence of negotiations. As the actual knowledge rule is unexceptionable and the exclusionary rule highly questionable, coherence can be brought to the law relatively easily. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Animals are, or are like persons, and so should not be treated as mere property. But persons are not just non-property; they are contractors. They interact with property and with other persons. This article analyses the possibilities for a range of animals to fit within market liberal society as contractors from a legal disciplinary perspective. Some animals are capable of contract-like relationships of reciprocal exchange, and can consent, in a certain sense, to parts of such relationships. However, the dangers of the contractual frame, which is used to legitimate exploitation, may exceed the benefits. Some scholars have begun to explore these issues through the lens of animal labour, animals as workers deserving protections and benefits for their efforts. I analyse the application of contract to a variety of non-human animals and consider the discursive implications of this application, then draw out lessons for the ongoing use of animal labour framing. If we are to think through animals as workers, we should be careful to oppose the contractualization of that work - just as human worker advocates do. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Originally, European consumer law was framed for boosting the internal market and welfare. The main aim of consumer legislation was "trough the achievement of a high level of consumer protection, to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market". However, since the growing awareness of planetary boundaries and climate change, consumer habits acquired a different accent in European lawmaking. To ensure the European Union's commitments towards the UN Sustainable Development Goals, a more sustainable single market for businesses and consumers was to be achieved. Thus, the first packages of Sustainable Consumption and Production targeted only production and, slowly but steadily, consumer legislation opens up to this trend. The new Consumer Directive, which should re-draft and modernise the Consumer's Sales Law, was the first step towards enhancing environmental sustainability in consumption. Ensuring longer durability of consumer goods via longer warranty periods, and software updates enabling consumers to require repair are the two mentioned aims of the Directives to encourage more sustainable consumption patterns and a circular economy. This article will investigate how far the Czech implementation contributed to these aims. After a brief explanation why promoting sustainability is a binding target for the European and national legislator (1), national best practices will be presented which are designed to improve sustainability trough contract law in other European countries (2), and finally, it will be followed by an analysis of how far the Czech transposition of Directive 2019/771/EU ensures these targets (3). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rights-based theories of private law tend to be wrongs based and defendant focused. But many private law wrongs do not seem like genuine wrongs, at least when the background distribution of resources is unjust. A very poor person, for example, may be held legally liable for breaching a one-sided contract with a very rich person. When such a contract reflects and reproduces existing injustice, it is hard to view the poor person's breach of such a contract as a genuine wrong against the rich person. Conversely, some obvious moral wrongs do not generate legal liability. There is, for example, no private law duty of rescue in the absence of a prior relationship in many situations in which most would agree that there is a moral duty of rescue. Thus, private legal liability seems not to track moral wrongdoing in significant respects, raising the question what instead justifies such liability. Instead of justifying private liability in terms of the defendant's wrongdoing, as corrective justice and civil recourse theorists do, we should seek a justification in terms of the plaintiff's moral permission to enforce her apparent rights. Switching our gaze from the defendant's wrongdoing to the plaintiff's moral permission to enforce her rights will not be normatively consequential if the plaintiff's moral permission arises when and only when the defendant has wronged her. But, I argue, background injustice can drive a wedge between genuine wrongdoing and the plaintiff's moral permission. Thus, by reconceptualizing private liability in terms of a plaintiff's moral permission to enforce her apparent rights, private law may be justified by the essential role it plays in constituting non-ideal political morality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On January 6, 2021, in the wake of the Capitol Hill uprising, Facebook suspended then-President Donald Trump's Facebook and Instagram accounts, citing the contract law principle of breach of contract for violating each company's terms of service; namely, Community Standards and Community Guidelines, respectively. Similarly, on January 8, 2021, Mr. Trump's Twitter account, @realDonaldTrump, was permanently suspended for violating the platform's Glorification of Violence policy. This left many asking whether the First Amendment's free speech clause, instead of contract law, should control user content on digital platforms. Put another way, if a social media platform was an intersection, should contract law or free speech have the right-of-way with respect to user content? This paper argues that while free speech has garnered significant attention recently, contract law properly has the right-of-way when it comes to controlling user content on social media platforms. In addressing the right-of-way question, this paper looks at arguments favoring contract law, arguments favoring free speech, and the available roads ahead. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Historically, if a creditor through his conduct prejudiced or injured a surety in the latter's rights or interest, the surety was entitled to claim release from his obligations under the general prejudice principle. However, the principle was summarily rejected by the Supreme Court of Appeal in Bock v Dubororo Investments (Pty) Ltd 2004 2 SA 242 (SCA), and it may now be determined whether there exists another interpretation in order to ensure its survival. This article considers the historical application of the general prejudice principle in suretyship agreements under South African law since the principle’s original incorporation from the English law up until its outright rejection by the Supreme Court of Appeal in Bock. It then aims to reinterpret the principle in the light of ordinary contract law principles as being nothing more than a breach of contract by the creditor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]