The article is an attempt to analyze the reprinted issues of the works of Ivan Franko Ukrainian public and cultural activist, writer, and the mentioned member of societies, based on the printed issues of two powerful centers of Eastern Galicia, the society of «Prosvita» and the Shevchenko Scientific Society in Lviv. Despite the popularity of Franko's works in the region and abroad in 1920-30s, the society of «Prosvita» published only 19 poems and some excerpts of poems in folk illustrated calendars. The publishing committe of the society made an interesting selection of writer's poems for publication in the adviser's books. Almost all works of philosophical and patriotic content, were incomplete and many of them were little known to the Galician reader. According numerous requests of the members of «Prosvita», they issued «Stolen Happiness», a drama on rural life in 5 acts, which was included in the «List of Censored Ukrainian Plays» authorized by the Polish authority. Shevchenko Scientific Society as well as «Prosvita», did not actively reprint the works of Ivan Franko (except two poems «Ivan Vyshenskyi» and «Zachar Berkyt»). The scientific research of Volodymyr Doroshenko has invaluable importance for Franko researches, historians, literary critics and translators. This author had been working for many years on the bibliographic Frankiana, but because of the war time and material crisis in Shevchenko Scientific Society, the publication was delayed every time. The reasons for the low number of reprinted issues of Kameniar's works during the interwar period were several: the social and political conditions of Ukrainian publishing, cultural and educational development of the people in the region, the difficult financial position of publishing institutions, the influence of the liberation struggle of the 1914-1920, literary works concerning everyday life, and customs and traditions of Ukrainians outside Galicia. On the other hand the young writer's radical position, his views on the organization of societies and publishing, his critical reviews and personal dislike of «Prosvita» and Shevchenko Scientific Society members all had some influence on the publication of the literary heritage of Franko even after his death. In the interwar period Galician people could read the works of Ivan Franko at the libraries, reading houses of «Prosvita» or buy them at local bookstores. Publishers had been very eager to advertise his works in their own catalogues, which helped the public to search an interesting or «useful» literature. At the same time, the Kameniar's works helped cultural and scientific institutions to shape the national outlook of Ukrainian people. Therefore, in spite of the policy of some publishers for literary heritage of Ivan Franko, he was one of the three most popular writers in the interwar period together with Taras Shevchenko and Andrii Chaikovskyi. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]