Search

Purpose: Achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer is associated with less recurrence and improved clinical outcomes compared to having residual cancer at surgery. However, recent data have demonstrated favorable outcomes for patients with residual HER2-positive cancer who received adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1). Therefore, we sought to determine the optimal chemotherapy/anti-HER2 treatment strategy. Methods: We created a decision-analytic model for patients with stage II–III HER2-positive cancer that incorporated utilities based on toxicity and recurrence. We separately modeled hormone receptor-negative (HR−) and positive (HR+) disease and calculated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs through 5 years. Simulated patients received one of the following neoadjuvant treatments: three 'intensive' regimens (TCHP: docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, pertuzumab; THP + AC: taxol, trastuzumab, pertuzumab then doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide; THP: taxol, trastuzumab, pertuzumab) and two 'de-escalated' regimens (TH: taxol, trastuzumab; TDM-1) followed by adjuvant treatment based on pathologic response. Results: Among 'intensive' neoadjuvant strategies, treatment with THP was more effective and less costly than TCHP or THP + AC. When 'de-escalated' strategies were included, TH became the most cost-effective. For HR-negative cancer, TH had 0.003 fewer quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) than THP but was less costly by $55,831, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of over $18M/QALY for THP, well above any threshold. For HR-positive cancer, neoadjuvant TH dominated the THP strategy. Conclusion: An adaptive-treatment strategy beginning with neoadjuvant THP or TH followed by tailoring post-operative therapy reduces treatment costs, and spares toxicity compared to more intensive chemotherapy regimens for women with HER2-positive breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of combining trastuzumab/vinorelbine with bevacizumab in patients with first-or second-line HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Eligible patients had HER2-positive measureable MBC, with no more than one prior line of chemotherapy, and were treated with trastuzumab (4 mg/kg × 2 mg/kg weekly thereafter), vinorelbine (25 mg/m weekly), and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks). Co-primary endpoints were (a) the proportion of patients alive and progression-free at 1 year and (b) safety profile/feasibility. Feasibility was defined as a rate of grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity attributable to protocol-based therapy <20 %. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled ( n = 22 first-line, n = 7 second-line). Median age was 48 years (range 37-68). The median number of cycles received was 8 (1-23) and median duration on treatment was 7.4 months (range 1-22). The study was closed early due to higher-than-expected rates of grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities, with 50 events in 20 patients. A total of six patients (21 %) were taken off study for treatment-related toxicity. Most common treatment-related toxicities included fatigue ( n = 7), febrile neutropenia ( n = 4), and headache ( n = 3). At 1 year, 8/22 first-line (36 %) and 2/7 second-line (29 %) patients were alive and progression-free. Median PFS was 9.9 months and 7.8 months in the first- and second-line cohorts, respectively. Objective responses were observed in 16/22 (73 %) and 5/7 (71 %) patients in the first- and second-line settings. Although the combination of vinorelbine, trastuzumab, and bevacizumab showed notable activity in HER2-positive MBC, the proportion of first-line patients alive and progression-free at 1 year was deemed unlikely to reach the pre-defined threshold for declaring success. Additionally, unacceptable toxicity was observed, at rates greater than previously reported with vinorelbine/trastuzumab or vinorelbine/bevacizumab doublet combinations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This phase I study explored gefitinib (G) and capecitabine (C) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: Sequential cohorts ( n = 3) received G and escalating C on a 14 day on/7 day off schedule, with a validation cohort ( n = 10) at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined in cycle 1. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included response and adherence. Results: About 19 patients were treated for a median of 5 cycles. No patients in sequential cohorts experienced DLT; C MTD was 2,000 mg/m2/day when paired with daily G 250 mg. In the validation cohort, four experienced serious toxicities, including diarrhea, mucositis, and palmarplantar dysesthesia. At the MTD, 6 (46%) required a C dose reduction, and 3 (23%) came off study for toxicity. One partial response was observed (8%, 95% CI 0.2–38.5%); five had stable disease >24 weeks (26, 95% CI 9–51%). Patients missed few drug doses, with the suggestion of overadherence to therapy. Conclusions: In this phase I study of G and C in MBC, a C MTD was identified, and significant toxicity was observed. About 8% demonstrated a response, with 26% maintaining stable disease. The possibility of overadherence, as suggested in this study, may have implications for other trials of oral antineoplastic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Periodontal disease is a chronic inflammatory condition induced by tooth-associated microbial biofilms that induce a host immune response. Therapeutic control of progressive tissue destruction in high-risk patients is a significant challenge in therapy. Soluble protein delivery of antagonists to tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibits alveolar bone resorption due to periodontitis. However, protein therapy raises several concerns, such as recurrence of disease activity after treatment cessation and repeated dosing regimens. In this study, we used pseudotyped adeno-associated virus vector based on serotype 1 (AAV2/1) to deliver the TNF receptor-immunoglobulin Fc (TNFR:Fc) fusion gene to rats subjected to experimental Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg)-lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-mediated bone loss. Animals received Pg-LPS delivered to the gingivae thrice weekly for 8 weeks, vehicle alone, Pg-LPS and intramuscular delivery of pseudotyped AAV2/1-TNFR:Fc vector (1 × 1011 DNase I-resistant particles) or AAV2/1-TNFR:Fc vector delivered to naive animals. AAV2/1-TNFR:Fc therapy led to sustained therapeutic levels of serum TNFR protein and protected against Pg-LPS-mediated loss of bone volume and density. Furthermore, AAV2/1-TNFR:Fc administration reduced local levels of multiple proinflammatory cytokines and osteoclast-like cells at the periodontal lesions. These findings suggest that delivery of AAV2/1-TNFR:Fc may be a viable approach to modulate periodontal disease progression.Gene Therapy (2009) 16, 426–436; doi:10.1038/gt.2008.174; published online 11 December 2008 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article comments on a study which found dose-limiting toxicity of radiation pneumonitis when adjuvant radiation and paclitaxel were administered concurrently to patients with stage II and III breast cancer. It cites that the study showed that dose-limiting radiation pneumonitis limits the use of concurrent paclitaxel and radiation in breast cancer. It asserts that the study confirmed the high rate of radiation pneumonitis development when both paclitaxel and radiation were given.

Background: Expansion of medical marijuana (MM) laws in the United States may offer oncology new therapeutic options. However, the scientific evidence for MM remains in infancy. This study qualitatively explored professional opinion around the role of MM in cancer care.Methods: Semistructured interviews were administered to a sample of individuals with expertise at the interface of MM and oncology nationally. Key informant criteria included an oncologic clinical or research background and any of the following: publications, research, or lectures on cannabinoids or cancer symptoms; involvement in the development of MM dispensaries or legislation; and early adoption of state MM certification procedures. A gold standard, grounded, inductive approach was used to identify underlying themes.Results: Participants (N = 15) were predominantly male, in their sixth decade, working in academic settings. Themes ranged from strong beliefs in marijuana's medical utility to reservations about this notion, with calls for expansion of the scientific evidence base and more stringent MM production standards. All participants cited nausea as an appropriate indication, and 13 of 15 pain. Over one-third believed MM to have a more attractive risk profile than opioids and benzodiazepines.Conclusions: Expert opinion was divided between convictions in marijuana's medicinal potential and guardedness in this assertion, with no participant refuting MM's utility outright. Emergent themes included that MM ameliorates cancer-related pain and nausea and is safer than certain conventional medications. Participants called for enhanced purity and production standards, and further research on MM's utility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An abstract of the article "A Randomized Study of Lapatinib Alone or in Combination With Trastuzumab in Heavily Pretreated HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Progressing on Trastuzumab Therapy," by J. O'Shaughnessy and colleagues, is presented.

The author discusses the emotions of guilt and forgiveness, noting that guilt can be necessary in the case of unethical behavior or error or gratuitous for events beyond one's control. He looks at the difference between guilt and shame in various religions and cultures, especially in the context of free will and the judgment of others. These concepts are applied to the role of Israel in the modern world, arguing that Jews should not be asked to apologize for supporting Israel.