Search

The detection of toxic molecules has gained imperial attention to protect living organisms and their environment. The broadly explored sensor behaviour of triazine-based C3N4 reveals their ultra-high sensitivity towards numerous toxic molecules e.g., chemical welfare agents. However, another potential analogue of C3N4 composed of heptazine exhibits remarkable electrical and optical properties but has not been much explored in sensor technology, especially for toxic pollutants. Keeping this in mind, the sensing performance of heptazine-based g-C3N4 is explored for the detection of toxic amides by using First Principles calculations. In this context, acryloyl amide (C2H3CONH2), acryloyl chloride (C2H3COCl), fluoroacetic acid (C2H3FCOOH), flouroaceta amide (C2H2FONH2), flouroacetyl chloride (C2H2FOCl) are selected as toxic pollutants; herein, for the ease of understanding, these molecules are represented as AAM, ACl, FAAc, FAA, & FACl, respectively. The electrochemical sensitivity of g-C3N4 is determined via geometric, energetic, and electronic properties analysis, whereas the photochemical sensitivity is explored by UV–Vis absorption analysis based on TD-DFT calculations. The interaction energies of studied molecules on C3N4 range between − 9.09 and - 23.39 kcal/mol depending upon the type of interactions e.g., hydrogen bonding or dispersion, which are explained on the basis of Symmetry Adopted Perturbation Theory, Non-Covalent Interaction Index, and Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules analyses. The density of State analysis, Frontier Molecular Orbitals and NBO charge transfer characterized that the electronic behaviour of g-C3N4 can be an effective sensor material with a semiconducting nature and significant charge transfer. Lastly, UV–Vis absorption analysis confirms the photosensitivity of g-C3N4 upon interaction with toxic molecules. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Though the gas sensing applications of graphdiyne have widely reported; however, the biosensing utility of graphdiyne needs to be explored. This study deals with the sensitivity of graphdiyne nanoflake (GDY) towards the uric acid (UA) within the density functional framework. The uric acid is allowed to interact with graphdiyne nanoflake from all the possible orientations. Based on these interacting geometries, the complexes are differentiated with naming, i.e., UA1@GDY, UA2@GDY, UA3@GDY, and UA4@GDY (Fig. 1). The essence of interface interactions of UA on GDY is derived by computing geometric, energetic, electronic, and optical properties. The adsorbing affinity of complexes is evaluated at ωB97XD/6–31 + G(d, p) level of theory. The stabilities of the complexes are quantified through the interaction energies (Eint) with reasonable accuracy. The calculated Eint of the UA1@GDY, UA2@GDY, UA3@GDY, and UA4@GDY complexes are − 31.13, − 25.87, − 20.59, and − 16.54 kcal/mol, respectively. In comparison with geometries, it is revealed that the higher stability of complexes is facilitated by π-π stacking. Other energetic analyses including symmetry adopted perturbation theory (SAPT), noncovalent interaction index (NCI), and quantum theory of atoms in molecule (QTAIM) provide the evidence of dominating dispersion energy in stabilizing the resultant complexes. The HOMO–LUMO energies, NBO charge transfer, and UV–vis analysis justify the higher electronic transition in UA1@GDY, plays a role of higher sensitivity of GDY towards the π-stacked geometries over all other possible interaction orientations. The present findings bestow the higher sensitivity of GDY towards uric acid via π-stacking interactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]