Ethics can vary greatly between every business culture in the world. More specifically, third world countries such as India and Mexico share a few similarities and differences when it deals with business ethics. In India, there is a lack of business ethics due to the common short changing customers and underground bribery with most transactions. In Mexico, some professionals believe that business ethics is also lacking and put aside when dealing with business. Both countries are well-known to have corrupt methods to maximize profits, with underground dealing or illegal methods of going about business. Now, both countries are enforcing anticorruption laws to reduce the amount of business-related crimes. In Hofstede's 6D model, India and Mexico rank similarly in most categories. For power distance, they were both only 4 points away from each other with scores of 77 and 81, respectively. This means they are from hierarchy societies, leading to great inequality between individuals of power. In individualism, India is a more independent and individualistic society with a score of 48 than Mexico (30). They both exhibit loyalty between employer and employee, creating a strong bond like family. Both countries are masculine countries, in which they are competitive and focus on profits and material gains. When it comes to avoiding uncertainty, Mexico rates a high score of 82, which means they stick to the rules and do not like sporadic behaviors. Unlike Mexico, India rates a rather low score of 40, which means they are lenient when it comes to the rules. If a person can adjust to changes in India, the individual will do fine in business and life. For long term orientation, India rates an intermediate score of 52, which means they follow traditions, but they would also consider pragmatic approaches when facing difficulties. In contrast, Mexico rates a low score of 24, which means they honor traditions and past methods to fix their problems instead. One big contrast both countries face in this model is when it comes to indulgence. Mexico (97) is a country of indulgence, who likes to enjoy life's luxuries and spends time leisurely. India, on the other hand, restrains themselves from their own indulgences. The country feels it is morally wrong to indulge often, so they like to control themselves more compared to Mexico. Although they have a few differences, they do have comparable tendencies in the way the countries both act. When it comes to customer service, both countries focus on maximizing profits, even if they lack in quality customer service. There are instances where the countries treat common customers like family, which can bring back loyal customers. The familial concept works for small business owners, which comprise most of the businesses owned in both Mexico and India. In India, where many people are connected for customer service assistance, customer service qualities are a known basic concept as well. Even if the stereotype for some Indian business owners is to swindle and bargain, the general population of Indian business owners treat customers well enough to bring them back, as well as Mexican businesses. Unlike the United States where everyone feels entitled to a certain power, Saudi Arabia is one of the countries that scores high with regards to power distance. It believes in a hierarchal order in which everybody has a place that people accept. In an organization, that means having a centralized system where subordinates are expected to be told what to do and everyone adheres to that. For instance, in a meeting room everyone would usually wait for the manager or the one with the highest position to initiate. On the other hand, in the United States someone in an inferior position is willing and able to challenge someone in a more superior position. Based on the definition of Hofstede's model, Saudi Arabia has more of a collectivistic rather than an individualistic culture when compared to the United States. As an example, in Saudi Arabia people usually like to establish trustful relationships before proceeding with work or other matters. In the Saudi culture, loyalty is a big issue and is the dominant value in social rules, also families there are considered the most significant element in society and sometimes to a person's identity. For the families, private life is usually not separated from the business life. For example, it is very much accepted for someone to provide a job or a position for a family member or relative in an organization that he is highly ranked in. However, the US has the highest score in individualistic countries; the cultural expectation is that everyone should fulfill their own personal needs. Also, the US culture is very accustomed to doing business with people they don't know well and managers and employees share information frequently in an informal and direct communication. Although recently, the practice of group work has been growing in importance, every individual is still entitled to their own opinion and is expected to individually contribute to the society. Saudi Arabia is classified as a very masculine culture; people there live to work and managers in this culture are expected to be decisive and confident in their decisions. Just like the United States there is a huge emphasis on competition and conflicts are usually solved by fighting them out. Through Hofstede's study, the United states scores a 46 on the uncertainty avoidance, which means it is a society that is uncertainty accepting. This shows that there is a high acceptance for new ideas and innovations in the US and that people in this culture are usually open to new business practices. Saudi Arabia though is on a higher score, 80 in this dimension. In Saudi Arabia, people there prefer avoiding uncertainty, but still rely on the concept of "Insha'Allah" meaning by god's will. They have very strict rules, and have an urge to be busy as time is very important to them. However, as situations that seem unclear can be uncomfortable, people still find comfort because of their strong beliefs. That sometimes may have some issues when doing business because the society does not readily accept change and thus is very risk adverse. There is not a huge difference in the scoring for long-term orientation between the US and Saudi Arabia. Both countries score normative; meaning they prefer to maintain time-honored traditions and norms while looking at social change with a little suspicion. This is reflected in the American business where they measure their performance on a short-term basis, with statements being issued on a quarterly basis. In the Saudi culture that can be seen in the exhibition of a lot of respect for traditions even when doing business. When reviewing the French business ethics, we see that France ranks last out of ten countries for workers' opinion of company management. According to the 2010 study by BVA, 2/5 of employees working under the France management say they actively dislike their firm's top managers. However, when comparing the two ethics, Coe-Rexecode, German bosses and employees are better than French ones when working collectively. Now when looking at the German individual ethics, we can see that many companies that the Germans support are ones full of morals and principles. According the Economist, if a manager believes that the business he/she is working for is causing harm to the society, he/she will not work for them. The Germany business leaders believe that working ethically will end in a business goal in maximizing ownership value and creating a better environment for people to work in. The ethics are quite different because we see in Germany companies that there can be opportunities of advancement however, we see that French companies are hierarchical, "holding no truck with Anglo-Saxon notions of empowerment. " Now comparing the two countries using the 6D Model from Hofstede, we see that France outdraws Germany in the aspects of Power Distance, Individualism, Uncertainty Avoidance and Indulgence. Looking at power distance, we see that France is at a 68 while Germany is at a 35. It is clear to see that France has less powerful members in a company that expect and accept that power is distributed unequally. We see this already in the ethics of how each business works in each country. But Germany contains a business environment where they try to maintain everyone on an equal level. Now comparing individualism, we see that France shows a more independent lifestyle whilst, Germany is illumining a more "we" society than anything. It is clear to see how these all dip within each other because when we analyze the countries masculinity, we see that France beats Germany in this aspect as well. While looking at the masculinity level, France society is driven by competition and seeing who is the winner. While Germany is more of the collective group coming together to win as a whole. Looking at uncertainty avoidance, both Germany and France are on the higher end, however, France is higher in the ways that the society doesn't like surprises and needs structure and organization. Long-term orientation shows that both countries are pragmatic and they adapt to change easily to prosper and grow. As we enter into the last one indulgence, we see that Germany is lower than France creating a society where they their tendencies are less likely to indulge and are more cynical and pessimistic. France is country that prides itself in tradition and its rich history. That means that there needs to be a certain harmony and rhythm that a customer must experience and appreciate. With its full cultural background, the customer service is strategic in ways that it pulls in tourism and shows its traditions and invites the customer to an experience that they can only achieve from the French. Now looking at the 6D model, we see that Germans have a more concrete society, efficient communication and focus on objectivity and technical issues dominate the conversation. This means that the Germans are direct to fix issues that arise, while may in return create a colder and uncaring customer relation. Their lower indulgence lowers speak loudly when we see how the Germans are wanting to perfect their relations rather than creating a friendly bond. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]