Search

The taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel represent the most active chemotherapeutic agents developed for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in the last decade, and they are now being incorporated into adjuvant chemotherapy trials for lymph node-positive breast cancer with the hope of improving on the results achieved with CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) or anthracycline-based regimens. So far, three randomized paclitaxel-based adjuvant clinical trials enrolling 3170-women (Cancer and Leukemia Group B [CALGB] 9344), 3060 women (National Surgical Adjuvant Project for Breast and Bowel Cancers [NSABP]B28), and 524 women (M. D. Anderson), respectively, have been reported with respective median follow-up times of 52, 34, and 43 months. This article critically reviews these three studies and gives an overview of the many other randomized clinical trials, due to accrue more than 17 000 women, which are investigating the potential of taxanes in adjuvant breast cancer therapy. Given that the early promise of taxanes suggested by CALGB 9344 is not yet confirmed by the two other trials, only level 2 evidence has been reached to date in regard to a positive contribution of these agents to breast cancer outcome in the adjuvant setting. It is argued that level 1 evidence is highly desirable before adopting taxane-based regimens in standard practice. It is anticipated that a metaanalysis will be needed to comprehensively define the value of taxanes in early breast cancer, and a new model of international collaboration is proposed to find a balance between the need to offer new, more effective therapies to patients as soon as possible and the danger of drawing wrong, premature conclusions regarding the magnitude of benefit of a new regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Measurement of molecular markers predictive of response to therapy should enable more selective and effective utilization of anticancer agents. The predictive value of HER2 remains a complex and inconclusive subject. In metastatic breast cancer, HER2-positive, ER-positive patients can show responses to endocrine treatment, but experience shorter time to progression and survival than HER2-negative patients. In the adjuvant setting, weak, retrospective evidence suggests that tamoxifen is potentially harmful in HER2-positive patients and that there is no benefit from prolonged tamoxifen therapy. It has not yet been demonstrated conclusively that HER2 positivity increases resistance to adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-FU (CMF), but there are indications that HER2-positive patients benefit more from adequately dosed anthracyclines than from CMF. The greatest value of HER2 as a predictive marker lies in the prediction of response to therapies that target HER2, such as Herceptin[sup ®] . Patients with strongly HER2-positive breast cancer derive significant clinical benefit from single-agent and combined Herceptin therapy. HER2 testing has become an integral part of the optimal management of the breast cancer patient. Best current practice in adjuvant breast cancer therapy based on the current knowledge of the potential predictive power of HER2 constitutes not denying tamoxifen to HER2-positive, ER-positive patients or CMF to HER2-positive patients. Outside of clinical trials, adequately dosed anthracycline-based chemotherapy is the current preferred adjuvant treatment option for HER2-positive patients.Copyright © 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author discusses a randomized trial for the longer use of tamoxifen to 10 years in treating patients with breast cancer. The results of this study were presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Chicago, Illinois from May 31 to June 4, 2013. Moreover, the results show that 10 years of tamoxifen administration reduced the recurrence of breast cancer by 2.5% and mortality rate by 1.4%.

The article discusses the clinical trial of trastuzumab (TR) after adjuvant chemotherapy in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer (EBC) at eight years of follow up. It reveals that the one year of TR improves disease-free (DFS) and overall survival in patients with HER2-positive EBC. In addition, the efficacy analysis compares the outcome of patients who were disease-free at one year after randomization.

The article focuses on the study which discusses the role of local therapy such as surgery and radiation in controlling metastatic breast cancer of 350 patients. It states that the overall survival (OS) was 20.5 percent for patients who underwent surgery and 19.2 percent for patients treated without surgery. It notes that local progression-free survival (PFS) was better with local therapy. It mentions that the removal of primary tumors may allow growth of distant metastases.

Purpose: Locoregional recurrence risk and the role of locoregional radiation therapy (LRRT) in pN0(i+) and pN1mi breast cancer are unclear. This study compares locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) in patients with pN0(i+) and pN1mi relative to pN0 and pN1a disease and evaluates LRRFS according to locoregional treatment.Methods and Materials: We studied 10,271 patients referred between 2006 and 2011 with newly diagnosed pT1-T2, pN0, pN0(i+), pN1mi, or pN1a, M0 breast cancer. Outcomes were 10-year Kaplan-Meier LRRFS, relapse-free survival (RFS), distant relapse-free survival, and breast cancer-specific survival. Multivariable analysis of LRRFS and RFS was performed in pN0(i+) and pN1mi cohorts.Results: Median follow-up was 9.3 years. In patients with pN0 (n = 7492), pN0(i+) (n = 305), pN1mi (n = 619), and pN1a (n = 1855) disease, LRRT was used in 1.1%, 24.3%, 45.7%, and 71.1%, respectively. Ten-year outcomes were LRRFS 96%, 92%, 97%, and 96% (P < .001), distant RFS 94%, 91%, 90%, and 84% (P < .001), and breast cancer-specific survival 95%, 90%, 93%, and 87% (P < .001), respectively. Ten-year LRRFS for patients treated with breast-conserving surgery alone, with breast RT, and with LRRT were 81%, 93%, and 91% for patients with pN0(i+) (P = .16) and 94%, 96%, and 100% for patients with pN1mi (P = .02), respectively. Among patients treated with mastectomy, 10-year LRRFS with surgery alone and with LRRT were 93% and 100% for patients with pN0(i+) (P = .12) and 95% and 99% for patients with pN1mi (P = .09). On multivariable analysis of patients with pN0(i+) and pN1mi, systemic therapy was associated with improved LRRFS in patients with pN0(i+) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.2; [0.06-0.6]; P = .005) and patients with pN1mi (HR, 0.1; [0.03-0.5]; P = .006). In patients with pN1mi, LRRT was associated with a trend toward increased LRRFS (HR, 0.2; [0.03-1.1]; P = .07). LRRT was not significantly associated with improved RFS in pN0(i+) or pN1mi disease.Conclusions: In the era of sentinel node staging and modern systemic therapy, patients with pN0(i+) and PN1mi treated with LRRT experienced 10-year LRR risks ≤10% after breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy and RT. LRRT was associated with a trend toward increased LRRFS in pN1mi but not pN0(i+) disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Randomized clinical trials have shown that regional nodal irradiation (RNI) in patients with unselected N1 breast cancer improves breast cancer-specific survival. However, the benefit of RNI in women with biologically low-risk N1 breast cancer is uncertain. We conducted a population-based study to determine whether RNI is associated with improved breast cancer recurrence-free interval (BCRFI) in this population.Methods and Materials: Patients aged 40 to 79 years with pT1-2 pN1 (node-positive) breast cancer diagnosed between 2005 and 2014 were identified. The inclusion criteria were modeled off of the TAILOR RT study, which is a randomized noninferiority clinical trial designed to assess the value of RNI in patients with low-risk N1 disease. Eligible patients had breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection with 1 to 3 positive nodes, breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy with 1 to 2 positive nodes, or mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy with 1 positive node. Additionally, patients had luminal A breast cancers, as approximated by estrogen receptor positive (Allred 6-8/8), progesterone receptor (PR) positive (Allred 6-8/8), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, and grade 1 to 2 immunohistochemical testing. All patients were prescribed hormonal treatment. The primary endpoint of BCRFI, the time to any breast cancer recurrence or breast cancer-related death, was analyzed using a multivariate competing risks analysis.Results: The cohort included 1169 women with a median follow-up of 9.2 years. Radiation treatments were not performed in 151 women treated with mastectomy alone, were delivered to the breast only in 133 women, and were delivered locoregionally in 885 women. Patients undergoing RNI were younger (median age: 58 vs 62 years), more likely to have 2 to 3 macroscopic lymph nodes involved, and more often received chemotherapy (all P < .05). The 10-year estimate of BCRFI was 90% without RNI versus 90% with RNI (P = .5). On multivariable analysis, RNI was not a significant predictor of BCRFI (hazard ratio: 1.0; P = .9).Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, RNI was not associated with improved BCRFI for women with biologically low-risk N1 breast cancer. We advocate accrual to the ongoing TAILOR RT study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Higher energy (>6 MV) photons reduce dose inhomogeneity with breast tangent beams, thereby reducing late breast toxicity, but skin and superficial tissue sparing by higher energy beams raises concerns about local recurrence (LR) risk. This study aimed to determine whether beam energy and surgical bed-to-skin distance affect LR.Methods and Materials: This population-based study included newly diagnosed invasive breast cancers without skin involvement (pT1-4a, any-N, M0) treated with breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant whole breast radiation therapy without bolus or beam spoilers. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of LR (CILR). Multivariable analysis (MVA) included mean beam energy, age, T-stage, nodal status, overall stage, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), grade, margin status, extensive intraductal component (EIC), breast cancer subtype, hormone therapy, and chemotherapy. In a subgroup with contoured surgical beds, another MVA included surgical bed-to-skin distance.Results: The cohort consisted of 10,083 women treated from 2002 to 2011: 327 with 4 MV, 6006 with 6 MV, 2083 with >6 to 10 MV, and 1667 with >10 MV tangents. The median follow-up time was 11.1 years. The 10-year CILR was 3.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-5.4) with 4 MV, 2.8% (2.4-3.3) with 6 MV, 4.2% (3.4-5.3) with >6 to 10 MV, and 2.6% (1.9-3.5) with >10 MV. On MVA of the entire cohort, LR risk was increased with positive margins, LVI, EIC, and lack of hormone therapy, but was not associated with beam energy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.96-1.05; P = .8). On MVA of 3359 patients with contoured surgical beds, LR risk was not associated with surgical bed-to-skin distance (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.02; P = .8).Conclusions: Use of higher breast tangent beam energies is not associated with increased risk of LR, including in cases with surgical beds that are close to the skin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The trial assigning individualized options for treatment (Rx) (TAILORx) confirmed the predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay in hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer and established thresholds for chemotherapy benefit in younger and older patients. Real-world chemotherapy use and RS-guided treatment costs in British Columbia post-TAILORx were examined.Methods: The authors assembled 3 cohorts of HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative patients with breast cancer defined by diagnosis: before RS funding (cohort 1 [C1]: January 2013-December 2013), after introduction of public RS funding (cohort 2 [C2]: July 2015-June 2016), and after TAILORx results (cohort 3 [C3]: July 2018-June 2019). Chemotherapy use was compared between cohorts by age and RS. Budgetary impacts of RS testing on chemotherapy costs were evaluated pre- and post-TAILORx.Results: Among the 2066 patients included, chemotherapy use declined by 19% after RS funding was introduced and by an additional 23% after TAILORx publication (P = .001). Reduction in chemotherapy use was significant for RS 11-20 tumors (C3 vs C2, P = .004). There was no significant change in chemotherapy use in patients >50 years old (C2:12% vs C3:10%, P = .22). RS testing was associated with higher cost savings post-TAILORx, except in patients 70 to 80 years old, where testing led to excess costs when adjusting for the low rate of RS-concordant chemotherapy prescribed.Conclusions: TAILORx has had population-based impacts on chemotherapy prescribing in intermediate RS tumors and patients ≤50 years old. The lower clinical use of RS and increased spending in patients 70-80 years old highlights the importance of careful selection of older candidates for high-cost genomic testing.Lay Summary: The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) test helps predict whether patients with hormone-positive, HER2-negative, lymph node-negative breast cancer are likely to benefit from chemotherapy. The recent trial assigning individualized options for treatment (Rx) (TAILORx) found that patients with intermediate RS tumors did not benefit from chemotherapy. The authors assessed whether TAILORx results translated to real-world changes in chemotherapy prescribing patterns. In this study, chemotherapy use decreased by 23% after TAILORx, with the greatest reductions seen among intermediate RS tumors and younger patients. In contrast, RS testing had lower clinical value and increased treatment costs in elderly patients, which requires further study to ensure optimal care for this age group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Bolus use during postmastectomy radiation therapy doubles the risk of grade 2 and 3 skin toxicity. Despite its unknown benefit, bolus is often prescribed during postmastectomy radiation therapy for patients without skin involvement.Methods and Materials: For women with breast cancer receiving photon 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, bolus was used routinely for chest walls but was omitted for breast reconstructions by about half of radiation oncologists from 2007 to 2011. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed invasive breast cancers without skin involvement (pT1-4a, any-N, M0) treated with adjuvant or neoadjuvant radiation therapy. For the bolus and no-bolus groups, we compared the cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR) and locoregional recurrence (LRR) with distant recurrence and death as competing risks and breast cancer mortality (BCM). Multivariable analysis of LR and BCM included stage, subtype, lymphovascular invasion, grade, margin status, beam energy, bolus use, hormone therapy, chemotherapy, and reconstruction.Results: Systemic therapy was used for 98% of the 1887 patients. The bolus group had 1569 patients and the no-bolus group had 318 patients. Bolus was used in 51% (281/550) of patients treated with reconstruction and 96% (1288/1337) of patients treated without reconstruction. The 10-year outcomes (95% confidence interval) in patients treated with and without bolus were, respectively: LR 1.9% (1.3-2.7) versus 0.9% (0.3-2.6), LRR 3.1% (2.3-4.0) versus 3.2% (1.6-5.5), and BCM 19.4% (17.3-21.6) versus 18.3% (13.9-23.2). On multivariable analysis, bolus use was not associated with better LR (hazard ratio = 1.4 [0.3-6.4]) or BCM (hazard ratio = 0.8 [0.5-1.2]).Conclusions: For patients treated with mastectomy, radiation therapy, and modern systemic therapy, the cumulative incidence of LR was low, with or without bolus. Because bolus use increases toxicity and does not reduce LR or BCM, it should no longer be used routinely for patients without skin involvement who receive systemic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Observational studies show that digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) combined with digital mammography (DM) can reduce recall rates and increases rates of breast cancer detection. The objective of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of DBT plus DM versus DM alone in British Columbia and to identify parameters that can improve the efficiency of breast cancer screening programs. Methods: We conducted an economic analysis based on data from a cohort of screening participants in the BC Cancer Breast Screening Program. The decision model simulated lifetime costs and outcomes for participants in breast cancer screening who were aged 40–74 years between 2012 and 2017. We analyzed rates of health care resource utilization, health state costs and estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), to measure incremental cost differences per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained from the addition of DBT to DM-based screening, from the government payer's perspective. Results: The model simulated economic outcomes for 112 249 screening participants. We found that the ICER was highly sensitive to recall rate reductions and insensitive to parameters related to cancer detection. If DBT plus DM can reduce absolute recall rates by more than 2.1%, the base-case scenario had an ICER of $17 149 per QALY. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY, more than 95% of the probabilistic simulations favoured the adoption of DBT plus DM versus DM alone. The ICER depended heavily on the ability of DBT plus DM to reduce recall rates. Interpretation: The addition of DBT to DM would be considered cost-effective owing to the low positive predictive value of screening with DM alone. Reductions in false-positive recall rates should be monitored closely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The predictive benefit of breast cancer molecular subtypes for systemic therapy approaches has been well established; yet, there is a paucity of data regarding their use as a predictor of radiation therapy fractionation sensitivity. The purpose of this study was to determine whether rates of local recurrence (LR) for patients treated with hypofractionated (HF) radiation therapy, in comparison to conventional fractionation, differ across breast cancer molecular subtypes in a large, prospectively collected cohort treated with modern systemic therapy.Methods and Materials: Patients who received a diagnosis of stage I-III breast cancer between 2005 and 2009 were identified. Molecular subtype was determined using the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification system (luminal-A, luminal-B, HER2+, triple negative [TN]). Multivariable Cox regression modeling was used to identify predictors of LR. LR-free-survival (LRFS) was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.Results: A total of 5868 cases were identified with a median follow-up of 10.8 years. Patients with luminal-A subtype composed 45% of the cohort (n = 2628), compared with 30% luminal-B (n = 1734), 15% HER2+ (n = 903), and 10% TN (n = 603). A total of 76% (n = 4429) of patients were treated with HF. The 10-year LRFS was 97.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.6-97.6) for the whole cohort. The 10-year LRFS based on molecular subtypes was 98.3% (95% CI, 97.6-98.7) luminal-A, 96.6% (95% CI, 95.5-97.4) luminal-B, 97.0% (95% CI, 95.5-98.0) HER2+, and 93.5% (95% CI, 91.1-95.3) TN (P < .001). There was no difference in the 10-year LRFS between patients treated with HF versus conventional fractionation among those with luminal-A (98.2% vs 98.4%; P = .42), luminal-B (96.6% vs 96.8%; P = .90), HER2+ (97.5% vs 95.8%; P = .12), or TN (93.9% vs 92.2%; P = .47). There was no significant interaction between subtype and fractionation regimen.Conclusions: These data support the routine use of hypofractionated radiation therapy regimens across all breast cancer subtypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study evaluated long-term, population-based, breast cancer-specific outcomes in patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) to the breast/chest wall plus regional nodes using hypofractionated (HF) (40-42.5 Gy/16 fractions) versus conventionally fractionated (CF) regimens (50-50.4 Gy/25-28 fractions).Methods and Materials: A prospective provincial database was used to identify patients with lymph node-positive breast cancer treated with curative-intent breast/chest wall + regional nodal RT from 1998 to 2010. The effect of RT fractionation on locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was assessed for the entire cohort and for high-risk subgroups: grade 3, ER-/HER2-, HER2+, and ≥4 positive nodes. Multivariable analysis and 2:1 case-match comparison of HF versus CF were also performed.Results: A total of 5487 patients met the inclusion criteria (4006 HF and 1481 CF). Median age was 55 years, and median follow-up was 12.7 years. On multivariable analysis, no statistically significant differences were identified in 10-year LRRFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-1.27; P = .46), DRFS (HR 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76-1.06; P = .19), or BCSS (HR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.76-1.10; P = .36) between the HF and CF cohorts. There was no statistical difference in breast cancer-specific outcomes in the high-risk subgroups. On analysis of 2962 HF cases matched to 1481 CF controls, no statistical difference was observed in LRRFS (HR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.71-1.33; P = .87), DRFS (HR 0.97; 95% CI, 0.85-1.11; P = .68), or BCSS (HR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.87-1.16; P = .92).Conclusions: This large, population-based analysis with long-term follow-up after locoregional RT demonstrated that modest HF provides similar breast cancer-specific outcomes compared with CF. HF is an effective option for patients with stage I to III breast cancer receiving nodal RT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine whether new systemic therapy regimens have resulted in improved survival and increased time on first- and second-line hormonal treatment for patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) over time.Methods: Patients diagnosed with HR-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative MBC were identified across 3 time cohorts (2003-2005, 2007-2009, and 2011-2013). Data were prospectively collected. Cases with previous, synchronous, or subsequent contralateral breast cancer were excluded. The types of first- and second-line therapies, the times on first- and second-line hormonal treatment, and the median survival times were compared across the cohorts.Results: Within the time period analyzed, 9 new adjuvant systemic therapies (with or without neoadjuvant therapy) and 2 metastatic systemic therapies were approved at BC Cancer for the treatment of HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC. In the 3 time cohorts, 3953 patients diagnosed with MBC were identified. Among the 2432 patients (62%) who had HR-positive/HER2-negative disease, 2197 (90%) received at least 1 line of systemic therapy after the diagnosis of MBC, and 80% of these patients (1752 of 2197) received first- and/or second-line hormonal treatment. The median duration on hormonal treatment was 9.0 months for the first line and 6.1 months for the second line. The durations were similar across the time cohorts (range for the first line, 8.9-9.0 months; range for the second line, 6.0-6.1 months). The median survival for the entire study population was 2.0 years (95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.1 years), and there was no significant difference between the cohorts (range, 1.9-2.0 years).Conclusions: Even though more adjuvant and metastatic systemic therapies have been approved since 2003, population-level gains in survival and the time on hormonal treatment for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC have not been made over the course of a decade. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]