Search

Abstract Background Health institutions advocate for psychosocial and recovery-oriented interventions alongside pharmacological treatment for severe mental illness. Participatory arts interventions appear promising in promoting personal recovery by fostering connectedness, hope, renegotiation of identity, meaning-making, and empowerment. Despite encouraging findings, however, the evidence base remains thin. Further, results from cognitive literature studies suggest possible impact on parameters of clinical recovery, but this has not been studied in clinical contexts. We developed REWRITALIZE, a structured, recovery-oriented, fifteen-session creative writing group intervention led by a professional author alongside a mental health professional. Participants engage with literary forms, write on them, share their texts, and partake in reflective discussions within a supportive, non-stigmatising environment, designed to promote self-expression, playful experimentation, agency, recognition, participatory meaning-making, renegotiation of identity and social engagement. The aim of this project is to evaluate REWRITALIZE for persons with severe mental illness through a randomised controlled trial (RCT) focusing on personal recovery outcomes. Additionally, an embedded pilot RCT will explore additional outcomes i.e., clinical recovery for a subgroup with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Methods The RCT is an investigator-initiated, randomised, two-arm, assessor-blinded, multi-center, waiting-list superiority trial involving 300 participants (age > 18) from six psychiatric centers in regions Capital and Zealand in Denmark, randomised to receive either the creative writing intervention combined with standard treatment or standard treatment alone. Assessments will be conducted before and after the intervention and at six months post intervention. The primary outcome is personal recovery at the end of intervention measured with the questionnaire of the process of recovery. Secondary outcomes include other measures of personal recovery, self-efficacy, mentalising, and quality of life. The pilot RCT, integrated within the RCT, will focus on 70 of the participants aged 18–35 with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, evaluating exploratory measures related to perspective-taking, social cognition, cognitive function, psychosocial functioning, and symptom pressure. Discussion This is the first RCT for creative writing groups. It assesses whether REWRITALIZE, as adjunct to standard mental healthcare, is more effective for personal recovery than standard care. If successful, it would provide evidence for the efficacy of REWRITALIZE, potentially enabling its implementation across mental health centers in Denmark. Trial registration Privacy (data protection agency): p-2023–14655. Danish National Center for Ethics: 2313949. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06251908. Registration date 02.02.2024.

Abstract Background Recovery from severe mental illness, including psychosis has been described as a personal and unique process, but it rarely is a journey undertaken without profound influences of significant others (family, mental health professionals). Diverging perspectives between persons with severe mental illness, family and professionals are frequent during the recovery process, notably in psychotic disorders. We aimed to explore processes of collaboration during recovery, to inform recovery supporting practices. Methods Current qualitative study had a participatory design and was set within long-term mental healthcare for severe mental illness. We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with persons with severe mental illness (most had a history of psychosis), family and professionals on their mutual contact during recovery. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we developed themes representing processes of collaboration during recovery. Results We described roles persons with severe mental illness, family and professionals attribute to each other in mutually influential terms of unconditional and meaningful contact (which takes time to establish) and problem-oriented aspects. Secondly, experienced differences over problem definition, “needing help” and consequently over the role parties attribute to one another, may result in negative interactions, in the area of having expectations; (not) informing; (not) having agency to change; experiencing (dis)agreement or struggle. Conclusions unconditional, meaningful contact and knowing each other’s perspective are important to fruitful interaction in a triad when perspectives on mental health problems diverge. Relationally centered and process oriented care with continuity of family and professionals involved are needed to advance recovery in severe mental illness, especially psychosis.

Objective: Weight gain can harm health and be socially stigmatizing. We sought to determine whether weight gain during the inpatient stay, as collateral damage related to lockdown, was more in patients admitted during the lockdown in the first pandemic year than in those admitted during the same period in the immediately preceding year. To our knowledge, this has not been previously investigated. Methods: We extracted from medical record weight data during two similar 4-month periods (April–July) in 2019 and 2020. We examined the impact of the ward restrictions during the pandemic lockdown on weight gain using multivariable regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounding variables selected a priori: age, sex, baseline weight, metabolic syndrome or antipsychotic load, and duration of inpatient stay. Results: There were 59 patients, almost all with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Patients admitted in 2019 (n = 27) were significantly more likely to consume alcohol or use illicit substances, but otherwise did not differ much from those admitted in 2020 (n = 32). Weight gain during inpatient stay was not statistically significant for 2019 (+1.85 kg; P = 0.22), 2020 (+0.74 kg; P = 0.26), or for the 2 years combined (+1.25 kg; P = 0.10). Finally, weight gain during inpatient stay did not differ between 2019 and 2020 (P = 0.83). In the regression analysis, the year of admission was not significantly associated with change in weight during inpatient stay (beta, −0.11; P = 0.43). Conclusions: Our findings validate our ward strategies to reduce the risk of weight gain during lockdown in inpatients with severe mental illness.

Abstract Background People with severe mental illness (SMI) face not only impaired mental health, but also a greater risk of physical comorbidities and a shorter life expectancy compared to the general population. A poor lifestyle plays a substantial role in this disparity. Combined Lifestyle Interventions targeting multiple lifestyle behaviors can improve mental and physical health, and quality of life. However, there is currently no appropriate structural support for people with SMI in outpatient care in the Netherlands. The Combined Lifestyle Intervention for Outpatients with SMI (GOAL!) is developed to address this gap. This study examines the (cost-)effectiveness and implementation of GOAL!. Methods In a type 1 hybrid quasi-experimental study with a mixed-method matched design, GOAL! participants (N = 50) are compared to people receiving care as usual (N = 50). The GOAL! program includes group and individual sessions, given by allied health professionals, over a period of two years. The first year starts with a 3-month intensive course on physical activity and nutrition, followed by 9 months of aftercare covering various lifestyle topics tailored to the group’s needs. There is close collaboration with local stakeholders to facilitate transfer to the community setting. The second year focuses on maintaining established activities in one’s daily living environment. Our primary outcome will be the change in physical activity, comparing GOAL! participants to those receiving care as usual. Secondary outcomes are changes in other lifestyle behaviors, physical health, mental well-being, and healthcare and societal costs. Additionally, achieving lifestyle-related goals, adverse effects, and barriers and facilitators to implementation are examined. Measurements are obtained at start (T0), and after 3 (T1), 12 (T2) and 24 months (T3). Discussion This study investigates the effects of GOAL! on lifestyle behaviors, health outcomes, implementation factors and cost-effectiveness after two years, aiming to offer valuable insights into the effectiveness and implementation outcomes of lifestyle interventions for outpatients with SMI. Trial registration : ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05600205). Prospectively registered on October 26, 2022.

Abstract Background Although national policies in China are comprehensive and instructive, a wide disparity exists between different cities. The current status of public mental health services by region in China remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate policies related to public mental health services, the contact coverage of public mental health services and outcomes of service users. Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out in Southern China, between April 2021 and March 2022. Considering the geographical location, socioeconomic development levels, and prevalence of severe mental illness, four cities including Wuhan, Changsha, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen were selected. Relevant service providers were asked to report data on mental health policies and facility-related information, including mental health resources, registration rates of patients, management rates of patients, and medication rates of patients. Eligible patients were invited to report service user-related data, including contact coverage of public mental health services and their outcomes. SPSS 26.0 was used for data analysis. Results The four cities in Southern China have made different efforts to develop public mental health services, primarily focusing on socio-economically disadvantaged individuals. Community health centers in Guangzhou and Shenzhen reported having more professional human resources on mental health and higher mental health budgets for patients. The contact coverage rates of most public mental services were higher than 80%. Patients in Changsha (B = 0.3; 95%CI: 0.1–0.5), Guangzhou (B = 0.2; 95%CI: 0.1–0.3), and Shenzhen (B = 0.3; 95%CI: 0.1–0.4) who received social medical assistance services reported higher levels of medication adherence. Patients in Wuhan (B = -6.5; 95%CI: -12.9--0.1), Guangzhou (B = -2.8; 95%CI: -5.5--0.1), and Shenzhen who received community-based rehabilitation services reported lower levels of disability (B = -2.6; 95%CI: -4.6--0.5). Conclusions There have been advances in public mental health services in the four Southern cities. The contact coverage rates of most public mental health services were higher than 80%. Patients’ utilization of public mental services was associated with better health outcomes. To improve the quality of public mental health services, the government should try to engage service users, their family members, and supporters in the design, delivery, operationalization, and evaluation of these public mental health services in the future.

Introduction: Mental illness is mental and emotional disturbances that affect individual thinking, feeling, decision-making, mood, and daily functioning. A poor attitude toward severe mental illness means an individual has a distorted perception or attitude toward severely mentally ill patients. Despite the presence of a high burden of negative attitudes toward severe mental illness, there is a limited study conducted on Ethiopian University students. Therefore, this study aimed to reveal the prevalence of poor attitudes toward severe mental illness and its associated factors among University Gondar medical students in Northwest Ethiopia. Method: An institutional-based cross-sectional study design was employed from Jun 25 to August 15, 2022. A structured self-administered questionnaire was used to screen the attitudes of students toward severe mental illness. Mental Illness Clinician's Attitude fourth version and Mental Health Knowledge Schedule score tools were used to screen the attitude of students. Bi-variable logistic regression analysis was employed and variables with a p-value of less than 0.25 were entered into the multivariable logistic regression for further analysis. Factors with a p-value less than 0.05 at a 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) in the multivariable logistic regression analysis were considered statistically significantly associated. Results: From the total of 423 study participants with a 100 % response rate the overall prevalence of poor attitude towards severe mental illness among university students was 68.1 % with a 95 % CI (63.6–72.6). Age (18–24) [AOR = 2.47; 95 % CI: (1.37,4.45)], being male [AOR = 3.22; 95 % CI: (2.01–5.17)], from a rural area [AOR = 1.82; 95 % CI: (1.13–2.93)], and with no family history of mental illness [AOR = 2.07; 95 % CI: (1.12–3.82)] were statistically significantly associated factors with poor attitude towards severe mental illness. Conclusions: and recommendations: Approximately three-fourths of university Gondar medical students (68.1 %) had poor attitudes towards severe mental illness. Age (18–24), being male, originating from a rural area, and with no family history of mental illness were significantly associated with a poor attitude toward severe mental illness. Awareness creation about mental illness can change the attitude of students which can be done by the mental health department to give as a common course can help the student to have a positive attitude.

Background and aims: There is increasing evidence to suggest companion animal ownership may positively impact mental health and wellbeing. However, there is limited research related to the role of companion animal ownership for mental health that focuses on people living with severe mental illness (SMI). We aimed to explore the connection among loneliness, mental health, wellbeing, animal ownership, and the perceived strength of the human-animal bond in this population., Methods: We conducted a survey in an existing UK cohort of people living with SMI. The survey questionnaire included standardized measures to collect information related to mental health, loneliness, and the perceived strength of the human-animal bond., Results: Of 286 participants who had previously consented to participate in the follow-up survey, 170 participants (59.4%) completed the survey. Of these, 81 (47.6%) owned at least one animal, and most perceived to have a strong human-animal bond with their companion animal as indicated by the Comfort from Companion Animals Scale (M = 39.80 of a maximum score of 44). However, regression analyses showed that owning an animal was not significantly associated with wellbeing, depression, anxiety, or loneliness scores. Likewise, the perceived strength of the human-animal bond was not significantly associated with animal species owned or wellbeing, depression, and anxiety scores., Conclusion: The findings provide a counterpoint to the commonly held assumption that companion animals are beneficial for all owners’ mental health. Further exploration of the role of human-animal relationships, including challenges and support needs related to animal ownership, in people living with SMI is required.

Background Severe mental illness (SMI), which includes schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder, has profound health impacts, even in the elderly. Aims To evaluate relative risk of hospital admission and length of hospital stay for physical illness in elders with SMI. Method To construct a population-based retrospective cohort observed from April 2007 to March 2016, data from a case registry with full but de-identified electronic health records were retrieved for patients of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, the single secondary mental healthcare service provider in south-east London. We compared participants with SMI aged >60 years old with the general population of the same age and residing in the same areas through data linkage by age-, sex- and fiscal-year-standardised admission ratios (SARs) for primary diagnoses at hospital discharge. Furthermore, we compared the duration of hospital stay with an age-, sex- and cause-of-admission-matched random group by linear regression for major causes of admission. Results In total, records for 4175 older people with SMI were obtained, relating to 10 342 admission episodes, showing an overall SAR for all physical illnesses of 5.15 (95% CI: 5.05, 5.25). Among the top causes of admission, SARs ranged from 3.87 for circulatory system disorders (ICD-10 codes: I00–I99) to 6.99 for genitourinary system or urinary conditions (N00–N39). Specifically, the diagnostic group of ‘symptoms, signs and findings, not elsewhere classified’ (R00–R99) had an elevated SAR of 6.56 (95% CI: 6.22, 6.90). Elders with SMI also had significantly longer hospital stays than their counterparts in the general population, especially for digestive system illnesses (K00–K93), after adjusting for confounding. Conclusions Poorer overall physical health and specific patterns were identified in elders with SMI.

Background: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been an effective treatment option available for elderly patients with severe mental illness; however, there are concerns related to its tolerability. Unilateral ECT has fewer cognitive adverse effects compared to bilateral ECT while efficacy with bilateral ECT is better. Aim: To evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of Bi-temporal ECT in elderly patients (>60 years) with severe mental illness in a general hospital set-up. Methodology: The study was a prospective, observational study conducted in SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad with a sample size of 15 elderly patients aged above 60 years with severe mental illness. Participants were screened for psychiatric symptoms with Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview and assessed for severity of symptoms with Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Young Mania Rating Scale, and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Cognitive functioning was assessed by Hindi Mental Status Examination Scale and effectiveness was assessed using global functioning by Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale. Assessment was done before giving ECT and 4 weeks at follow-up. The study period was from January 2019 to December 2019. Results and Conclusions: The median age of the elderly was 61 years. Majority (66.7%) were diagnosed with mood disorder and 33.3% of the patients were diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia. Around 47% had comorbid hypertension and 33.3% had diabetes mellitus. All the patients in the study sample received thrice weekly bi-temporal ECT in the range of 2–8 with median of 5. Significant reduction in symptomatology was observed, on comparing the scores before and after ECT with improvement in overall functioning assessed by GAF Scale. There was no decline in cognitive functioning test, although there was an improvement in the Hindi version of mini mental status examination scores at 4 weeks after discharge. By the above observations, we concluded that the use of bi-temporal ECT in elderly patients with severe mental illness was found to be safe and effective in treating.

Abstract Background The burden of severe mental illness is high in low-resource settings like Uganda. But most affected people are not treated due to inadequacy of sectoral funding and trained mental health professionals. Medication has hitherto been the main method of treatment for severe mental illness worldwide. However, there is a growing realization that the use of community-based resource-oriented interventions like the family involvement are more effective and suitable for under-resourced settings. But there is a paucity of information about its applicability in Uganda. Methods We based the intervention at the mental health unit of Masaka Regional Referral Hospital, involving 30 patients with SMI, 60 family members and friends, and 6 mental health clinicians. It was delivered through regular monthly meetings of 5 patients, 10 caretakers, and 2 clinicians each, for six months. A purposive sample of 15 patients, 15 caretakers, and 6 clinicians participated in this qualitative evaluation study after 6 months. Data was collected using in-depth interviews. Atlas.Ti (version 7.0.82) computer software was used in data analysis. Both priori and grounded codes were used to code data. Results We evaluated perceived feasibility, acceptability and impact of the intervention in the Ugandan context. The findings were largely positive. Feasibility was mainly driven by: the training of group facilitators, field support and supervision, prior relationship between participants, and scheduling and timing of meetings. Acceptability was supported by: anticipation of knowledge about mental illness, process and content of meetings, safety of meeting environment, and choice of participants and venue. Impact was majorly in domains of: knowledge about mental illness, psychosocial aspects of mental illness, networking and bonding, and patients’ quality of life. The success of the intervention would further be enhanced by its decentralization and homogenized composition of groups. Conclusions The intervention promises to spur improvement in the following main aspects of mental health services: accessibility since the meeting environment is more neutral and friendlier than the clinical setup; knowledge of mental illness; recognition of the important role of the family in management of mental illness; adoption of holistic approaches to mental illness; and quality of life of patients.

Abstract Background People with severe mental illness (SMI) such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are at a substantially higher risk of premature death in that they die between 10 and 20 years earlier than the general population. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes are the main potentially avoidable contributors to early death. Research that explores the experiences of people with SMI highlights their struggles in engaging with health professionals and accessing effective and timely interventions for physical health conditions. A consequence of such struggles to navigate and access physical healthcare results in many people with SMI relying heavily on support provided by informal carers (e.g., family members, close friends). Despite this, the experiences of informal carers, and the roles they undertake in relation to supporting the physical health and psychotropic medication use of people with SMI, remains under-researched. Aims To explore the impacts of providing care for physical health in severe mental illness on informal carers. Method Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with eight informal carers of people with SMI in United Kingdom (UK) national health services. Results Informal carers played an active part in the management of the patient’s conditions and shared their illness experience. Involvement of informal carers was both emotional and practical and informal carers’ own lives were affected in ways that were sometimes deeply profound. Informal carers were involved in both ‘looking after’ the patient from the perspective of doing practical tasks such as collecting dispensed medication from a community pharmacy (caring for) and managing feelings and emotions (caring about). Conclusions Providing care for the physical health of someone with SMI can be understood as having two dimensions - ‘caring for’ and ‘caring about’. The findings suggest a bidirectional relationship between these two dimensions, and both have a cost for the informal carer. With appropriate support informal carers could be more actively involved at all stages of care without increasing their burden. This should be with an awareness that carers may minimise the information they share about their own needs and impacts of their role to spare the person they care and themselves any distress.

Abstract Introduction Victimisation of persons with severe mental illness is recognised as an urgent global concern, with literature pointing to higher rates of violent victimisation of persons with severe mental illness than those of the general population. Yet, for low income countries, there is a huge gap in the literature on the risk, character and victims’ in-depth experiences of victimisation of persons with severe mental illness. We explore the lived experiences and meanings of victimisation of persons with severe mental illness in Uganda, and discuss their implications for care of the mentally ill. Methods A pluralistic qualitative study was undertaken to explore victimisation among patients with severe mental illness. Patients who had suffered victimisation were purposively sampled from Butabika National Referral Mental Clinic and Masaka Regional Referral Hospital, following confirmation of symptom remission. In-depth interviews were held with 18 participants, comprising 13 females and 5 males from low to moderate socioeconomic status. Interpretative phenomenological analysis and thematic content analysis were conducted. Results Victimisation was exhibited in three main forms: (a) psychological, expressed in attitudes towards mentally ill family members as valueless and dispensable, and stigmatisation, (b) physical, as manifested in beatings, indoor confinement and tethering mostly by family members and (c) sexual victimisation, particularly rape. Also observed were victim’s various responses that pointed to the negative impact of victimisation, including a heightened risk of suicide, social withdrawal, a sense of hatefulness and a predisposition to more victimisation. Conclusion The family environment plays a predominant role in perpetrating victimisation of the mentally ill in some sub-Saharan African contexts such as Uganda. We propose a holistic framework for mental health interventions, incorporating biomedical but notably also social determinants of mental health, and targeted at improving familial relationships, social support and a sense of belongingness both within the family and the broader community.

Abstract Background The relationship between severe mental illness and risky sexual behaviors, defined as acts associated with a higher risk level is notably significant in sub-Saharan Africa. In Uganda, mental disorders have been substantially correlated with unsafe sexual practices, contributing to the global burden of risky sexual behaviors. The consequential outcomes, such as sexually transmitted diseases, has resulted into a significant challenge in managing severe mental illness and potentially increased risky sexual behaviour. There is an urgent need to identify and understand factors specific to Uganda that amplify the vulnerability of severe mental illness patients to risky sexual behaviors. This study aimed to understand the vulnerability factors to risky sexual behaviour in severe mental illness in central and south-western Uganda, seeking to inform the development of tailored and effective intervention strategies to address this critical issue. Methods This was a qualitative descriptive study that was carried out at Butabika and Masaka hospitals in Uganda, involving a varied group of 32 individuals, comprising 12 persons with diagnosed Severe Mental Illness (Schizophrenia, Bipolar Affective Disorder, or Recurrent Major Depressive Disorder) and to risky sexual behaviors, 8 caregivers (who had patients with severe mental illness and to risky sexual behaviors) and 12 mental health specialists, (who had treated these participants). Purposive sampling was done by intentionally selecting participants based on specific attributes relevant to the research question and the objective of the study which was to explore the factors contributing vulnerability to risky sexual behaviour in severe mental illness in central and south-western Uganda. The interviews were conducted, centered on personal experiences and influences on risky sexual behaviors for the persons with severe mental illness, targeting insights into the nuanced interplay of severe mental illness and sexual behavior. For caregivers and mental health specialists, the interviews were conducted to gain a comprehensive understanding of the unique challenges, perspectives, and experiences they encounter in providing support and treatment respectively. The interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Framework analysis of transcribed interviews, using NVivo11 software that helped to systematically organize and code data within the predetermined and emergent thematic framework, we were able to identify patterns and themes to address the research question and objective. Results The study findings underscored a pervasive pattern of engaging in risky sexual behavior among individuals coping with severe mental illness, a growing concern traditionally associated with sexually transmitted infections like HIV and AIDS, unwanted pregnancies, and sexual encounters with strangers. This problem was largely attributed to factors such as compromised judgment due to underlying morbidity, abnormally high libido, poverty, desperation, and inadequate social support. Additionally, sexual deprivation, often a result of stigma, discrimination, and prolonged periods of hospitalization, was found to contribute to irresponsible and risky sexual acts. Respondents also highlighted certain practices and structural weaknesses within hospital environments, such as stripping patients naked when going to seclusion rooms and inadequate patient monitoring. Conclusions The findings underscore the need for targeted interventions addressing both individual and structural factors to alleviate the risks associated with sexual behavior among individuals with severe mental illness.

Abstract Background The high rates of psychiatric re-hospitalizations (also termed “revolving door”) presents a “wicked problem” which requires a systematic and holistic approach to its resolution. Israel’s mental-health rehabilitation law provides a comprehensive set of services intended to support the ability of persons with severe mental illness to rely on community rather than in-patient facilities for their ongoing care needs. Guided by the Health Behavior Model, we examined the relationship between psychiatric re-hospitalizations and the three Health Behavior Model factors (predisposing factor: socio-demographic characteristics and health beliefs; enabling factor: personal and social/vocational relationships facilitated by rehabilitation interventions and services; and need factor: outcomes including symptoms, and mental health and functional status) among persons with severe mental illness receiving rehabilitation services. Methods Logistic regression models were used to measure the association between re-hospitalization within a year and variables comprising the three Health Behavior Model factors on the sample of consumers utilizing psychiatric services (n = 7,165). The area under the curve for the model was calculated for each factor separately and for all three factors combined. Results A total of 846 (11.8%) consumers were hospitalized within a year after the study began. Although multivariable analyses showed significant associations between re-hospitalization and all three Health Behavior Model factors, the magnitude of the model’s area under the curve differed: 0.61 (CI = 0.59–0.64), 0.56 (CI = 0.54–0.58), 0.78 (CI = 0.77–0.80) and 0.78 (CI = 0.76–0.80) for predisposing, enabling, need and the full three-factor Health Behavior Model, respectively. Conclusion Findings revealed that among the three Health Behavior Model factors, the need factor best predicted re-hospitalization. The enabling factor, comprised of personal relationships and social/vocational activities facilitated by interventions and services representing many of psychiatric rehabilitation’s key goals, had the weakest association with reduced rates of re-hospitalization. Possible explanations may be inaccurate assessments of consumers' personal relationships and social/vocational activities by the mental healthcare professionals, problematic provider-consumer communication on the consumers' involvement in social/vocational activities, or ineffective methods of facilitating consumer participation in these activities. Clearly to reduce the wicked “revolving-door” phenomenon, there is a need for targeted interventions and a review of current psychiatric rehabilitation policies to promote the comprehensive integration of community rehabilitation services by decreasing the fragmentation of care, facilitating continuity of care with other healthcare services, and utilizing effective personal reported outcomes and experiences of consumers with severe mental illness.