Search

Introduction: Antibiotic susceptibility tests (AST) done on blood cultures are critical for the treatment of patients suspected to be suffering from bloodstream infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of disc diffusion AST conducted directly (direct AST) from flagged-positive blood cultures, especially for Gram-positive cocci bacteria., Methodology: This study compared direct AST with conventional AST (broth micro-dilution). The antibiotics studied were piperacillin/tazobactam, gentamicin, ceftazidime, erythromycin, and penicillin. Accuracy was determined by calculating very major, major, and minor errors. The reliability was determined by categorical agreement and weighted Kappa index., Results: Gram-positive cocci bacteria were grown in pairs of blood culture bottles and tested with the two methods of AST. No very major errors were detected among the five types of antibiotics. Major errors of 2.56% and minor errors of 4.93% were found when testing gentamicin. The major and minor errors when testing erythromycin were 2.85% and 1.23%, respectively. Perfect agreements (categorical agreement: 100%; weighted Kappa index: 1) of the two AST methods were observed with piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, and penicillin. Almost perfect agreement was found with gentamicin and erythromycin. Categorical agreement results when testing antibiotics gentamicin and erythromycin were 93.83% and 97.53%, respectively. In addition, the weighted-Kappa index when testing these two antibiotics were 0.92 and 0.96, respectively., Conclusions: The accuracy and reliability of the direct AST was within acceptable limits., Competing Interests: No Conflict of Interest is declared, (Copyright (c) 2024 Osman Sianipar, Rizka N Firdaus, Ira Puspitawati.)

The escalation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) due to the excessive and inappropriate use of antimicrobials has prompted the urgent need for more rapid and effective antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods. Conventional AST techniques often take 16-24 h, leading to empirical prescription practices and the potential emergence of AMR. The study aimed to develop a rapid disk diffusion (RDD) method utilizing laser speckle formation (LSF) technology to expedite AST results. The study aimed to evaluate the performance of LSF technology in determining antimicrobial susceptibility. In this study, preclinical and clinical settings were established to compare the LSF technology with conventional disk diffusion (DD) methods to measure the inhibition zones. Preclinical experiments with different bacterial strains demonstrated more than 70% categorical agreement (CA) against most antimicrobials. Further, clinical experiments with multiple strains and antibiotics revealed CA ranging from 40 to 79%, while major and minor discrepancies were observed around 30% and 11%, respectively. These observations revealed high concordance between RDD and DD for multiple antimicrobials in multiple species. The results underscore the potential of RDD-based LSF technology for hastening AST procedures. The current study is marked by a unique equipment setup and analysis approach. Collectively, the suggested laser-based RDD showed greater potential than previously developed comparable methods. The proposed method and design have a higher application potential than formerly developed similar technologies. Together, the study contributes to the ongoing development of rapid AST methods., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To evaluate the performance of an in-house developed disk diffusion method for aztreonam in combination with avibactam against Enterobacteriales., Methods: The in vitro antibacterial activity of aztreonam with avibactam against 204 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriales was determined by a disk diffusion method, with a broth microdilution method as a reference., Results: The optimal S/R breakpoints for disk diffusion tests of 30/20 and 10/4 µg disks, calculated by the dBETs software using the model-based approaches, were ≥22/≤21 and ≥12/≤11 mm, respectively. On the basis of the estimated breakpoints, the CAs for disk diffusion tests of 30/20 and 10/4 µg aztreonam/avibactam disks were both 98.0%, with 0.5% major error and 37.5% very major error., Conclusions: The home-made disk diffusion method is an economical and practical method for clinical microbiology laboratories to determine the antibacterial susceptibility of aztreonam with avibactam against Enterobacteriales., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) by disk diffusion provides an accurate image of bacterial growth, enabling the detection of culture purity, heterogeneous growth, and antibiotic interactions. However, this manual method is time-consuming and visual interpretation is prone to errors. To overcome these disadvantages, the Radian® In-Line Carousel (Copan, Brescia, Italy) was launched, which is a WASPLab® module dedicated to full automation of (pre)-analytical steps as well as interpretation of disk diffusion AST. However, until now, no evaluation of Radian® against manual disk diffusion has been performed. We assessed the categorical agreement (CA) between standardized disk diffusion (reference method) and Radian® using EUCAST 2021 breakpoints. We tested 135 non-duplicate strains, selected from the National EUCAST challenge panel, clinical strains, and external quality controls. The strains included Enterobacterales (n = 63), Enterococcus faecalis (n = 3), Enterococcus faecium (n = 10), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 16), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 19), coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 4), and Streptococcus spp. (n = 20). Furthermore, we explored antibiotic disk thermolability in the WASP Radian® carousel by testing 10 ATCC® strains up to 7 days. The observed CA was 95.3%, 96.3%, 93.8%, 97.3% and 98.0% for Enterobacterales, Enterococcus spp., P. aeruginosa, Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp., respectively, resulting in an acceptable overall CA for all groups. (Very) major error rates were ≤ 5% for all antibiotics. Antibiotic disk thermostability was confirmed up to 4 days in the WASP Radian® In-Line Carousel. The Radian® In-Line Carousel provides a fully automated solution for accurate disk diffusion AST, reducing workload and improving standardization and traceability. In addition, our study demonstrated the thermostability of antibiotic disks up to 4 days in the WASP Radian® In-Line Carousel., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The applications of organosulfur compounds, especially thioketones are varied which concerns both synthetic and biological chemistry. In this context, from the essential oil of Artemisia judaica L., extracted by hydrodistillation, and consisting mainly of piperitone (91.77 %), thione, and thiol derivatives were hemi-synthesized via a thionylation reaction byphosphorus pentasulphide (P2S5). The possible thione-thiol tautomerism in solution followed spectrophotometrically revealed the predominance of thiol form in solution. The antimicrobial activity of essential oils showed that the thionylation of essential oil caused a considerable increase in antimicrobial activity in particular against Escherichia coli.

The antibiotic norfloxacin was adsorbed on clay and carbon-clay nanocomposites (MD-210 and MDac3-210-500, synthesized by hydrothermal carbonization of dextrose) but maintained its antimicrobial activity once adsorbed. To degrade it, direct (DP) and indirect (IP, with sulfate radicals) photolysis were performed. Antimicrobial activity tests were performed to evaluate the degradation generated. There were no significant differences between DP and IP for unabsorbed norfloxacin solution. The IP treatment caused a loss of antibiotic activity in all cases. For DP, the carbon samples showed better results than those of clay, evidencing the importance of oxygenated carbonaceous groups in the photolysis of norfloxacin.

Background: Bacteroides fragilis group (BFG) isolates are the most frequently isolated gram-negative anaerobic bacteria and exhibit higher levels of antimicrobial resistance than other anaerobic bacteria. Reliable susceptibility testing is needed because of reports of resistance to the most active antibiotics. Recently, the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) introduced disk zone diameter breakpoints. We evaluated the disk diffusion test (DDT) for susceptibility testing of BFG isolates compared with the agar dilution method., Methods: In total, 150 BFG isolates were collected from three institutes in Korea. The agar dilution method was conducted according to the CLSI guidelines. DDT was performed following the EUCAST guideline. Fastidious anaerobe agar supplemented with 5% defibrinated horse blood was used as the culture medium. Nine antimicrobials were evaluated: penicillin, cefoxitin, cefotetan, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, clindamycin, moxifloxacin, and metronidazole., Results: The categorical agreement (CA) between the two methods was >90.0% for imipenem, meropenem, clindamycin, and metronidazole. However, the CA for piperacillintazobactam was low, at 83.2%. Major errors were found: 5.4% for imipenem, 7.4% for meropenem, and 12.8% for piperacillin-tazobactam. All minor errors were <10%. We propose using the area of technical uncertainty (ATU) zone-overlapping area for susceptible and resistant strains to reduce errors in the DDT. Outside the ATU, the CAs of cefoxitin, cefotetan, and piperacillin-tazobactam were >90.0%, whereas that of moxifloxacin was increased to 88.5%., Conclusions: The DDT can be a useful alternative antimicrobial susceptibility test for BFG isolates when using the ATU zone to reduce errors.

Staphylococcus saprophyticus, a common uropathogen, is usually susceptible to urine-concentrating antimicrobials, so routine AST is not recommended by CLSI. Our study evaluated the antimicrobial resistance profiles of 277 S. saprophyticus isolates from North America and a globally diverse cohort. Notably, 24% (67/277) of our isolates come from non-urinary sources. AST was performed against 12 antimicrobials using standard disk diffusion, PCR for mecA and mecC, PBP2a production assays, and cefinase. 5% (13/277) of isolates were mecA positive and cefinase positive, 63% (176/277) were mecA negative but cefinase positive, 4% (11/277) were mecA positive but cefinase negative, and 28% (77/277) were mecA and cefinase negative. All (277/277) isolates were susceptible to delafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, rifampin, linezolid, and nitrofurantoin and 95% (262/277) were susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Our results showed that regardless of using CLSI or EUCAST breakpoints oxacillin had low categorical agreement for mecA presence, making it unsuitable for surrogate testing, while cefoxitin disk diffusion had high very major error rate. If possible, PBP2a or mecA testing is recommended for guiding therapy for non-urinary infections. Our work supports CLSI guidelines on routine susceptibility to urinary tract antibiotics., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that impacts 49 million people annually and causes 11 million deaths worldwide. Surviving bloodstream infections (BSIs) depends on the rapid administration of effective antimicrobial treatment, underscoring a need for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST)., Aim: To evaluate the performance of Quantamatrix's dRAST v2.5 system (Seoul, South Korea) for AST directly from positive blood cultures as compared to the Disk-Diffusion (DD) and VITEK 2 methods., Methods: The study included 191 positive blood cultures from clinical samples and spiked blood culture bottles. Following Gram staining and species-level identification, AST was performed by VITEK 2 and standard DD methods using CLSI (2021) interpretation., Results: dRAST demonstrated very good AST performance for a Gram-negative isolate, and good performance for Gram-positive isolates, meeting CLSI criteria for the acceptance of a new method. Antimicrobials that were not considered verified compared to VITEK 2 and DD were cefazolin, ceftazidime, meropenem, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for Gram-negatives and clindamycin, erythromycin, penicillin, and oxacillin for Gram-positives. dRAST ESBL detection results were strongly correlated with the ESBL phenotypes obtained with other methods. Additional resistance mechanisms were in concordance with traditional tests., Conclusions: dRAST demonstrated good AST performance, meeting CLSI criteria for most relevant antibiotics. dRAST was associated with a significant reduction in time-to-results, labor, and the subjectivity of result analyses, making it a valuable addition to efforts supporting the treatment of patients with bacteremia. AST (antimicrobial susceptibility test), blood culture, dRAST, rapid methods, sepsis, turnaround time (TAT)., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) specifies the agar depth (4±0.5 mm) when performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Since the infrastructure to produce standardized agar may be lacking in settings with limited resources, we wanted to examine to what extent variation in agar depth affects the inhibition zone diameters of quality control (QC) strains and AST of clinical isolates. Methods. The inhibition zone diameters on Mueller-Hinton II agar with different depths (2-6 mm) were tested for various QC strain-antimicrobial agent combinations using Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213. The relationship between zone diameters at different agar depths and MICs was investigated for 35 clinical isolates ( E. coli , Klebsiella pneumoniae , S. aureus and P. aeruginosa ) from Sierra Leone using MICs as the reference. Results. The inhibition zone diameters were within the acceptance ranges as defined by the EUCAST for the majority of QC strains and antimicrobials, independent of the agar depth. At extreme agar depths, inhibition zones were more frequently out of range. The accuracy of AST varied for clinical isolates at different agar depths for categorical agreement (85.8-94.6%), major error rate (0.4-2.1%) and very major error rate (VME: 3.3-12.5%). Conclusions. Even if the QC strains were in the acceptance range at different agar depths, this does not rule out unacceptably high VME rates (>3%) in clinical isolates.

The application of titanium oxide nanotubes for the removal of contaminants from freshwater is a rapidly growing scientific interest, especially when it comes to water conservation strategies. In this study we employed four different titanium oxide nanotube surfaces, prepared by a two-electrode anodic oxidation. Two of the surfaces were synthesised in aqueous media, while the other two surfaces were synthesised in ethylene glycol. One of the arrays synthesised in the organic medium was impregnated with silver nanoparticles, while the remaining surfaces were not. The chemical reactivity of the various surfaces was assessed using 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2’-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) as free electron sensitive probe molecules, in parallel with tannic acid degradation and copper ion reducing capacity. The potential antimicrobial activity of the surfaces was assessed against a panel of microorganisms composed of yeast, fungi, Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Field emission scanning electron microscopy revealed that surfaces produced in the aqueous medium had a smaller tube length and a smaller tube diameter. It was noted that one of the materials using sodium sulfate as the supporting electrolyte had the most irregular nanostructure morphology with tubes growing to the side rather than vertically. The structural variation of the surfaces directly reflected both the chemical and biological activity, with the nanotubes formed in ethylene glycol showing the fastest rates in the stabilization of DPPH and ABTS radicals, the fastest tannic acid decomposition under various pH conditions and the fastest metal reducing activity. Furthermore, the surface containing silver and its bare counterpart showed the most effective antimicrobial activity, removing approximately 82% of Gram-negative bacteria, 50% of Gram-positive bacteria, 70% of yeast and 40% of fungi, with Gram-negative bacteria being the most susceptible to these surfaces.

The use of rapid disk diffusion or modified automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) system approaches demonstrates excellent performance for gram-negative organisms directly from blood cultures. In a recent study, S. Khan, A. Das, A. Mishra, A. Vidyarthi, et al. (Microbiol Spectr 12:e03081-23, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03081-23) compared the performance of three direct-from-blood AST methods against standard of care disk diffusion and automated AST. The results demonstrated high categorical agreements and low error rates across three protocols. The study suggests that locally validated direct-from-blood AST protocols offer reliable and fast results, particularly for resource-limited settings. However, local context and workflows should be considered prior to implementing rapid AST protocols, and more research is needed on the performance of rapid AST protocols for gram-positive organisms., Competing Interests: Andrea Prinzi is a paid employee of bioMerieux (Field Medical Director, US Medical Affairs).

To evaluate the in vitro activity of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. baumannii using the broth disk elution testing, a total of 150 A. baumannii isolates were collected from across China between January 2019 and January 2021, including 51 carbapenem-susceptible and 99 carbapenem-resistant isolates. Broth disk elution (BDE) and the broth microdilution (BMD) method were performed for all strains. The concentration range of the BDE was 10/10 µg/mL, 20/20 µg/mL, and 30/30 µg/mL for ampicillin-sulbactam, and 37.5/15 µg/mL, 75/30 µg/mL, 112.5/45 µg/mL, and 150/60 µg/mL for cefoperazone-sulbactam, respectively. Compared with BMD, the BDE results of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam showed a categorical agreement of 83.3% (125/150) and 95.3% (143/150), with minor errors of 16.7% (25/150) and 4.7% (7/150), respectively. No major error or very major errors were detected. The sensitivity differences by BDE of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAb) to different concentrations of ampicillin-sulbactam showed statistically significant (p < 0.017), while those to cefoperazone-sulbactam at 37.5/15 µg/mL, 75/30 µg/mL, and 112.5/45 µg/mL were significant (p < 0.008). However, no significant difference in sensitivity was observed between 112.5/45 µg/mL and 150/60 µg/mL (p > 0.008). In conclusion, the BDE is a reliable and convenient method to detect the in vitro activity of cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. baumannii, and the results could serve as a clinical reference value when deciding whether or not to use high-dose sulbactam for the treatment of A. baumannii infections., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of ampicillin resistance in Haemophilus influenzae and the diagnostic accuracy of the EUCAST recommended disc diffusion method to detect the increasingly prevalent ampicillin resistance due to the presence of PBP3 alterations based on mutations in the ftsI gene., Methods: During a 6-month period all consecutive non-duplicate H. influenzae isolates were prospectively collected and stored. MICs of ampicillin were determined by broth microdilution (BMD). PCR was performed to detect mutations in the ftsI gene. Results of routine disc diffusion susceptibility testing, including the penicillin screening test in accordance with the current EUCAST methodology, as well as additional Etest results, were compared to the BMD as the reference method., Results: In 102 isolates, the prevalence of ampicillin resistance was 28% (29/102) by BMD. There was a good correlation between MICs of ampicillin and the presence of a β-lactamase and/or an ftsI gene mutation. The prevalence of ampicillin resistance was overestimated using the EUCAST method (33% (34/102)) and underestimated when an additional Etest was used (24% (24/102)) (not significant). The sensitivity and specificity of the EUCAST methodology for the detection of ampicillin resistance were 97% ((28/29); 95% CI, 82-100%) and 92% ((67/73); 95% CI, 83-97%), respectively., Conclusions: The prevalence of ampicillin resistance was 28%, as determined by BMD. Although the overall diagnostic accuracy of the EUCAST ampicillin disc diffusion was high, misclassification of ampicillin susceptibility may still occur., (Copyright © 2024 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To assess performance of Etest®, Vitek®2 and BD Phoenix™ to determine the susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains to penicillin, ampicillin and cefotaxime., Methods: Sixty unique S. pneumoniae challenge strains were selected to cover a wide range of penicillin, ampicillin and cefotaxime minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Strains were analyzed in four different Belgian laboratories. Etest® benzylpenicillin (BEN), ampicillin/amoxicillin (AMP) and cefotaxime (CTA) (bioMérieux), Vitek®2 AST-ST03 (bioMérieux) and BD Phoenix™ SMIC/ID-11 testing were each performed in two different labs. Results were compared to Sensititre® broth microdilution (BMD) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) results. MIC results were interpreted using EUCAST non-meningitis breakpoints (v 13.0)., Results: Essential agreement (EA) was ≥ 90% for all methods compared to BMD, except for Etest® BEN on Oxoid plate (58.3%), Etest® AMP (both on Oxoid (65.8%) and BD BBL plate (84.2%)). Categorical agreement (CA) for penicillin was only ≥ 90% for Vitek®2, for other methods CA ranged between 74 and 84%. CA for AMP was for all methods < 90% (range 75.8-88.3%) and CA for CTA was between 87 and 90% for all methods except for Etest on Oxoid plate (79.2%)., Conclusions: Our study indicates that Vitek®2 and BD Phoenix™ are reliable for providing accurate pneumococcal susceptibility results for BEN, AMP and CTA. Using Etest BEN or AMP on Oxoid plate carries a risk of underestimating the MIC and should be interpreted with caution, especially when the obtained MIC is 1 or 2 doubling dilutions below the S or R clinical breakpoint., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Current methods for screening small molecules that inhibit the plasmid pCD1-encoded Yersinia pestis type III secretion system (T3SS) include lengthy growth curves followed by multistep luminescence assays or Western blot assays to detect secretion, or lack thereof, of effector proteins. The goal of this research was to develop a novel disk diffusion assay on magnesium oxalate (MOX) agar as a simple way to evaluate the susceptibility of Y. pestis to type III secretion system inhibitors. MOX agar produces distinct Y. pestis growth characteristics based on the bacteria's ability or inability to secrete effector proteins; small, barely visible colonies are observed when secretion is activated versus larger, readily visible colonies when secretion is inhibited. Wild-type Y. pestis was diluted and spread onto a MOX agar plate. Disks containing 20 μl of various concentrations of imidocarb dipropionate, a known Y. pestis T3SS inhibitor, or distilled water (dH 2 O) were placed on the plate. After incubation at 37°C for 48 h, visible colonies of Y. pestis were observed surrounding the disks with imidocarb dipropionate, suggesting that T3S was inhibited. The diameter of the growth of colonies surrounding the disks increased as the concentration of the T3SS inhibitor increased. Imidocarb dipropionate was also able to inhibit Y. pestis strains lacking effector Yops and Yop chaperones, suggesting that they are not necessary for T3S inhibition. This disk diffusion assay is a feasible and useful method for testing the susceptibility of Y. pestis to type III secretion system inhibitors and has the potential to be used in a clinical setting. IMPORTANCE Disk diffusion assays have traditionally been used as a simple and effective way to screen compounds for antibacterial activity and to determine the susceptibility of pathogens to antibiotics; however, they are limited to detecting growth inhibition only. Consequently, antimicrobial agents that inhibit virulence factors, but not growth, would not be detected. Therefore, we developed a disk diffusion assay that could detect inhibition of bacterial virulence factors, specifically, type III secretion systems (T3SSs), needle-like structures used by several pathogenic bacteria to inject host cells with effector proteins and cause disease. We demonstrate that magnesium oxalate (MOX) agar can be used in a disk diffusion assay to detect inhibition of the T3SS of Yersinia pestis, the causative agent of bubonic plague, by small-molecule inhibitors. This assay may be useful for screening additional small molecules that target bacterial T3SSs or testing the susceptibility of patient-derived samples to drugs that target T3SSs.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative bacillus included among the six "ESKAPE" microbial species with an outstanding ability to "escape" currently used antibiotics and developing new antibiotics against it is of the highest priority. Whereas minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values against Pseudomonas aeruginosa have been used previously for QSAR model development, disk diffusion results (inhibition zones) have not been apparently used for this purpose in the literature and we decided to explore their use in this sense. We developed multiple QSAR methods using several machine learning algorithms (support vector classifier, K nearest neighbors, random forest classifier, decision tree classifier, AdaBoost classifier, logistic regression and naïve Bayes classifier). We used four sets of molecular descriptors and fingerprints and three different methods of data balancing, together with the "native" data set. In total, 32 models were built for each set of descriptors or fingerprint and balancing method, of which 28 were selected and stacked to create meta-models. In terms of balanced accuracy, the best performance was provided by KNN, logistic regression and decision tree classifier, but the ensemble method had slightly superior results in nested cross-validation.

Aim: Early determination of antimicrobial susceptibility of sepsis pathogens is important. In this study, we aimed to compare the standard disc diffusion method with the rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) method performed directly from blood culture bottles. Material and Methods: Bacteria isolated from samples that gave a positive signal on the blood culture device between April 2019 and September 2019 were included in the study, and antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined by the standard disc diffusion method and the RAST method. Categorical agreement, small error, large error, very large error, and area of technical uncertainty ratios were recorded. Results: A total of 103 bacteria including 19 S. aureus, 10 Enterococcus spp. and 24 E. coli, 24 K. pneumoniae, 13 P. aeruginosa, and 13 A. baumannii were included in the study. When the RAST method was compared with the standard disc diffusion method, 100% agreement was found between the methods against imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in E. coli isolates at all hours evaluated, and against meropenem in K. pneumoniae isolates at the 6th and 8th hour. For S. aureus and P. aeruginosa isolates, very major errors were found in the RAST results. For A. baumannii isolates, 100% agreement between methods was observed for many antibiotics. Conclusion: It was concluded that the RAST method is a simple and inexpensive test for life-threatening infections such as sepsis. It was also felt that similar studies should be carried out with a large number of isolates, as compliance rates vary depending on the bacteria tested.

Determination of polymyxins susceptibility by clinical laboratories is a nightmare, mainly because of physicochemical properties of the drug. Elution tests have already been proposed for colistin, but not for polymyxin B. We aimed to evaluate accuracy of Polymyxin B broth disk elution (PBDE) to determine the susceptibility to this drug. We evaluated 196 Enterobacterales (45.9% polymyxin B-resistant). PBDE was done in 15-mL cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth where one polymyxin B disk (300 U) was eluted (2 μg/mL). BMD was performed as reference method. Categorical Agreement (CA), Major Error (ME) and Very Major Error (VME) were 99.5%, 0% and 1.11% (one false-negative K. pneumoniae MIC 4 μg/mL), respectively. As some institutions preferably use polymyxin B over colistin and in some countries colistin are not commercially available, to specifically evaluate polymyxin B is important. PBDE proved to be a cheap and easy to perform methodology to evaluate susceptibility to polymyxin B among Enterobacterales., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the disk diffusion technique against E-test as a routine antibiotic susceptibility testing method for Helicobacter pylori., Materials and Methods: Susceptibilities of 301 H pylori clinical isolates were simultaneously profiled by E-test and disk diffusion method for levofloxacin (5-μg disk), clarithromycin (15-μg disk), metronidazole (5-μg disk), amoxicillin (10-μg disk), and tetracycline (30-μg disk). Furazolidone susceptibility was evaluated using a 100-μg disk only. The correlation between MICs by E-test and inhibition zone diameters by disk diffusion was assessed by linear regression analysis., Results: Correlation between inhibition zone diameters and MICs was found for levofloxacin (r = -.932), clarithromycin (r = -.894), and to a minor extent metronidazole (r = -.820). Using the linear regression analysis, the inhibition zone diameter breakpoints were calculated to be 29 mm for levofloxacin, 41 mm for clarithromycin, and 15 mm for metronidazole corresponding to the EUCAST-recommended MIC breakpoints. The susceptibility agreement between E-test and disk diffusion for levofloxacin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole was 98.6%, 96.0%, and 96.7%, respectively. The inhibition zone diameters recorded for the amoxicillin, tetracycline, and furazolidone were large (approximately 60 mm in mean), and a poor correlation was found between inhibition zone diameters and MICs for amoxicillin (r = -.594) and tetracycline (r = -.490)., Conclusions: The disk diffusion can be used as a routine H pylori susceptibility testing method for levofloxacin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole in clinical practice under the described technical conditions. The use of disk diffusion for amoxicillin, tetracycline, and furazolidone susceptibility testing needs to be further studied., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To determine methicillin resistance in staphylococcus aureus by different phenotypic methods, and to evaluate their accuracy with mecA gene polymerase chain reaction for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus detection., Methods: The descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from January to December 2015 at the Post- Graduate Medical Institute, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised consecutive, non-repetitive clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus that were screened with oxacillin disk 1μg and cefoxitin disk 30μg by Kirby-Bauer method using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guideline. The isolates were cultured on oxacillin screen and mannitol salt agar, and subjected to latex agglutination for penicillin-binding protein 2aand polymerase chain reaction for mecA gene. Data was analysed using SPSS 20., Results: All the 105 isolates were resistant on oxacillin and cefoxitin disk diffusion test, but 95(90.47%) were positive for mecA gene by latex agglutination and polymerase chain reaction. The sensitivity of oxacillin salt agar, mannitol salt agar and latex agglutination was 94.31%, 96.73% and 98.95%, respectively. Keeping polymerase chain reaction as the gold standard, the specificity and diagnostic accuracy of latex agglutination were 77.77% and 97.14% respectively, which was the highest among all the phenotypic methods., Conclusions: Latex agglutination method can be proposed as a swiftly reliable diagnostic technique for the detection of mecA gene in methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus isolates in resource-constrained settings where molecular methods are limited.

Piperacillin-tazobactam (P/T) is a β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination frequently used in the hospital setting. Etest is a gradient diffusion method that represents an alternative to broth microdilution (BMD) for performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing. We conducted a multicenter evaluation of the performance of the new P/T Etest compared to that of BMD following U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and International Standards Organization (ISO) standard ISO 20776-2 criteria using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-FDA and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) interpretive breakpoints, respectively. A total of 977 isolates (775 Enterobacterales isolates, 119 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, and 83 Acinetobacter baumannii complex isolates) were tested. Overall essential agreement (EA) was 96.4% and 96.6% for Enterobacterales when FDA and ISO 20776-2 criteria, respectively, were followed. EA was 98.3% for P. aeruginosa and 91.6% for the A. baumannii complex when both the FDA and ISO criteria were followed. Applying CLSI-FDA breakpoints, categorical agreement (CA) reached 93.0%, 93.3%, and 89.2% for the Enterobacterales , P. aeruginosa , and the A. baumannii complex, respectively. Two very major errors (VMEs; 1.1%) were found among the Enterobacterales (for 2 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates). No additional major errors (MEs) or VMEs were found. Applying EUCAST breakpoints, CA was 94.8% and 95.8% for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa , respectively (no breakpoints are currently available for the A. baumannii complex). No VMEs were observed among the Enterobacterales , but 2 (0.4%) MEs were found. Among the P. aeruginosa isolates, 2 (6.9%) VMEs and 3 (3.3%) MEs were observed. These errors resulted when P/T Etest MICs were 1 doubling dilution apart from the BMD MICs. In conclusion, the new P/T Etest represents an accurate tool for performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacterales , P. aeruginosa , and A. baumannii complex isolates with limited category errors., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.)

Objectives: Until recently, the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommended the cefoxitin disc to screen for mecA-mediated β-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. A recent study indicated that cefoxitin was inferior to oxacillin in this respect. We have re-evaluated cefoxitin and oxacillin discs for screening for methicillin resistance in S. pseudintermedius., Methods: We included 224 animal and human S. pseudintermedius isolates from Europe (n = 108) and North America (n = 116), of which 109 were mecA-positive. Disc diffusion was performed per EUCAST recommendations using 30-μg cefoxitin and 1-μg oxacillin discs from three manufacturers and Mueller-Hinton agar from two manufacturers., Results: Cefoxitin inhibition zones ranged from 6 to 33 mm for mecA-positive S. pseudintermedius (MRSP) and from 29 to 41 mm for mecA-negative S. pseudintermedius (MSSP). The corresponding oxacillin zone intervals were 6-20 mm and 19-30 mm. For cefoxitin 16% (95% CI 14.8-18.0%) of the isolates were in the area where positive and negative results overlapped. For oxacillin the corresponding number was 2% (1.6-2.9%). For oxacillin a breakpoint of susceptible (S) ≥ 20 mm and resistant (R) <20 mm resulted in only 0.4% and 1.1% very major error and major error rates respectively., Conclusions: This investigation confirms that the 1-μg oxacillin disc predicts mecA-mediated methicillin resistance in S. pseudintermedius better than the 30-μg cefoxitin disc. For a 1-μg oxacillin disc we propose that 20 mm should be used as cut off for resistance, i.e. isolates with a zone diameter <20 mm are resistant to all β-lactam antibiotics except those with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci., (Copyright © 2019 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

There are increasing reports of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) that test as cefepime-susceptible (S) or susceptible-dose dependent (SDD). However, there are no data to compare the cefepime testing performance of BD Phoenix automated susceptibility system (BD Phoenix) and disk diffusion (DD) relative to reference broth microdilution (BMD) against carbapenemase-producing (CP bla KPC -CRE) and non-producing (non-CP CRE) isolates. Cefepime susceptibility results were interpreted according to CLSI M100Ed32. Essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), minor errors (miEs), major errors (MEs), and very major errors (VMEs) were calculated for BD Phoenix (NMIC-306 Gram-negative panel) and DD relative to BMD. Correlates were also analyzed by the error rate-bounded method. EA and CA for CP bla KPC -CRE isolates ( n -CRE and non-CP CRE with BD Phoenix and DD tests. For error rate-bounded method, miEs were <40% for I n = 58), EA and CA were 96.6%, and 79.3%, respectively. CA was <90% with DD for both cohorts. No ME or VME was observed for either isolate cohort; however, miEs were >10% for CP bla KPC -CRE and non-CP CRE with BD Phoenix and DD tests. For error rate-bounded method, miEs were <40% for I High + 1 to I Low - 1 ranges for CP bla KPC -CRE and non-CP CRE with BD Phoenix. Regarding disk diffusion, miEs were unacceptable for all MIC ranges among CP bla KPC -CRE. For non-CP CRE isolates, only I High + 1 to I Low - 1 range was acceptable at 37.2%. Using this challenge set of genotypic-phenotypic discordant CRE, the BD Phoenix MICs and DD susceptibility results trended higher (toward SDD and resistant phenotypes) relative to reference BMD results yielding lower CA. These results were more prominent among CP bla KPC -CRE than non-CP CRE., Competing Interests: P.J.S. reports grants and personal fees from OpGen, Inc., bioMérieux, Inc., Qiagen, and BD Diagnostics; grants from Affinity Biosensors and T2 Biosystems; and personal fees from Shionogi, Inc., Entasis, Merck, and GeneCapture, outside the submitted work. D.P.N. served as a consultant or speaker's bureau member or has received research funding from Allergan, Cepheid, Merck, Pfizer, Wockhardt, Shionogi, Tetraphase, and Venatorx. T.E.A. has received research funding from Venatorx, Paratek, Shionogi, and Spero Therapeutics. A.F. has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Purpose: The study explores the impact of significant interpretative breakpoint changes for aminoglycosides and piperacillin-tazobactam in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, considering PK/PD, clinical data, and susceptibility on clinical reporting and use., Procedure: Between January 2021 and June 2023, a total of 189,583 samples were processed for bacterial pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using disc diffusion method/VITEK® 2 Compact system/broth microdilution. WHONET software was utilised to capture and analyse the changes in the interpretation of disc diffusion method, following updates to CLSI M100 documents in comparison to previous editions. Antimicrobial consumption data was collected and interpreted as DDD/100 bed days using AMC tool software. Here, we present data for 13,615 members of Order Enterobacterales and 1793 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates., Finding: Enterobacterales exhibited a significant susceptibility drop of 14.7% for gentamicin and 21.7% for amikacin. Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed an increase in isolates with intermediate tobramycin susceptibility, from 0.6% to 29.7%, with relatively minor changes in piperacillin-tazobactam interpretation., Conclusion: The changes indicate a shift toward increased 'resistance' and 'intermediate susceptibility' for these antibiotics, emphasizing the need for cautious use and leveraging PK/PD knowledge for improved antibiotic utilization, patient outcomes, and antimicrobial stewardship., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Antimicrobial discs for susceptibility testing can be obtained from many manufacturers. We evaluated the quality of discs from nine manufacturers in 2014 and 2017., Methods: Antimicrobial discs of 16 agents from nine manufacturers were evaluated using EUCAST criteria. Discs were tested in triplicate on Müller-Hinton medium against EUCAST quality control (QC) strains. Mean values were compared with targets and ranges in the EUCAST QC tables., Results: Three manufacturers (Becton Dickinson, Mast and Oxoid) demonstrated excellent and consistent disc quality both in 2014 and 2017. Manufacturers with discs of inadequate quality improved their results between the two periods. Overall, 92% (795/861) versus 97% (1038/1071) of zone diameter readings were within QC ranges and 58% (497/861) versus 75% (806/1071) were within the QC target ± 1 mm, for the first and second studies, respectively. One manufacturer (HiMedia) had major quality problems with 33% (26/78) of readings out of range in the first study and 17% (20/120) in the second study. Discs from some manufacturers showed unexpected variation in inhibition zone diameters (4-9 mm) for discs within the same vial., Conclusions: Antimicrobial discs from three of nine manufacturers exhibited excellent and reproducible quality. The discs of the other six manufacturers demonstrated various quality issues, some of which were severe. After presenting the results to manufacturers and users, all managed to improve the quality. Our study points to the need for more stringent criteria for disc manufacturing. Criteria should not only address the nominal potency of discs but also define the end result., (Copyright © 2018 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: With the worldwide spread of antibiotic resistance, delivering antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) results in a timely manner represents a major challenge. In cases of sepsis, rapid AST may facilitate early optimization of empiric antibiotic therapy. Disc diffusion is a well-standardized AST method, however 16 to 24 h are required to achieve an overall AST profile according to antimicrobial societies., Methods: In this prospective pilot study, we evaluated the performance of Mueller-Hinton-Rapid-SIR (MHR-SIR) agar after 6-8 h of incubation in comparison with standard MH agar after 16 h of incubation directly on positive blood cultures caused by Enterobacteriaceae and Staphylococcus aureus from routine clinical microbiology. A total of 133 positive blood samples including 110 Enterobacteriaceae (83%) and 23 Staphylococcus aureus (17%) were tested in parallel by two direct AST methods, each using EUCAST breakpoints. For each combination bacterium and antibiotic, we compared the categorical agreement and the correlation between the diameters obtained by MHR-SIR and by standard MH., Results: Our results showed 97.7% categorical agreement for Enterobacteriaceae, with 1.4% minor errors, 0.4% major errors and 0.5% very major errors. For S. aureus, we observed 97.8% categorical agreement, 1.9% minor errors, 0.3% major errors and no very major errors., Conclusion: Our results showed excellent categorical agreement and correlations between diameters for MHR-SIR and standard MH methods. MHRSIR can predict the result of overall AST profile within 6-8 h with reliable results. AST is obtained on the same day the blood culture becomes positive, with a very moderate cost., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV) is a novel carbapenem-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, including pyelonephritis, in adults. In this study, we evaluated the performance of Etest MEV (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) compared to that of broth microdilution for 629 Enterobacterales and 163 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. According to CLSI/FDA breakpoints, 13 Enterobacterales isolates (12 clinical and 1 challenge) were resistant to MEV. Overall, Etest MEV demonstrated 92.4% essential agreement (EA), 99.2% category agreement (CA), 0% very major errors (VME), 0% major errors (ME), and 0.8% minor errors (mE) with clinical and challenge isolates of Enterobacterales Individual species demonstrated EA rates of ≥80%, with the exception of Proteus mirabilis , for which clinical and challenge isolates demonstrated 34.3% EA, 97.1% CA, 0% ME, and 2.9% mE, precluding the use of Etest MEV with this species. Excluding P. mirabilis , MEV Etest MEV demonstrated 95.8% EA, 99.3% CA, 0% VME, 0% ME, and 0.7% mE with Enterobacterales isolates. When evaluated using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints, Etest MEV performance with clinical (16 MEV resistant) and challenge (12 MEV resistant) isolates of Enterobacterales (excluding P. mirabilis ) and P. aeruginosa demonstrated an unacceptably high VME rate of 7.1% despite 95.2% EA, 99.2% CA, and 0.5% ME compared to the reference method. In conclusion, we report that Etest MEV is accurate and reproducible for MEV susceptibility testing for P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales , with the exception of P. mirabilis , using CLSI/FDA breakpoints. Etest MEV should not be used with P. mirabilis due to unacceptable analytical performance., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.)

Reliable assessment of the susceptibility of animal bacterial pathogens to antimicrobials is of paramount importance in the fight against antimicrobial resistance. This work aims to estimate the repeatability (intra-laboratory agreement) and reproducibility (inter-laboratory agreement) of the disc diffusion assay in veterinary laboratories to understand further if the assay has a role in the surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in animals. Seven major veterinary laboratories from all States in Australia participated, and each tested the same panel of isolates five times at three to four-week intervals, against six antimicrobial agents using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. The panel consisted of twenty different isolates from porcine Escherichia coli from clinical cases and a single reference strain (ATCC 25922). Laboratories were blinded to the identity of the isolates, replicates, and to each other. In total, 4200 inhibition zone diameters (mm) were collected, and analysed descriptively, graphically, and with linear mixed models. Regardless of the laboratories and isolate/antimicrobial combinations, the overall very major error rate (proportion of isolates classified as susceptible when actual status is resistant) was 1.6%; the major error rate (proportion of isolates classified as resistant when actual status is susceptible) was 1.6%; and the 'minor error' rate (proportion of isolates with intermediate susceptibility that measure fully susceptible or resistant or vice versa) was 2.4%. The variation between repeated measurements ranged between 4.4-7.2 mm depending on the antimicrobial agent assessed. The reproducibility was always more variable than the repeatability, which suggested some laboratory effects. The repeatability coefficient of disc diffusion was lowest for tetracycline (4.4 mm, 95% CI: 3.8-5.0 mm) and ampicillin (4.6 mm, 95% CI: 4.2-5.2 mm) and highest for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (6.6 mm, 95% CI: 5.9-7.4 mm). The reproducibility coefficient of disc diffusion was lowest for gentamicin (5.4, 95% CI: 4.0-7.2) and highest for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (7.2 mm, 95%CI: 4.5-11.7 mm). The precision of the disc diffusion assay was deemed satisfactory for use in a national surveillance program for clinical porcine E. coli isolates. However, measurement variation of the disc diffusion assay is of concern for isolates with marginal susceptibility or resistance due to increased risk of misclassification., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Third-generation cephalosporin resistance among Enterobacteriaceae , mediated by the spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), is a very serious medical concern with limited therapeutic options. Enmetazobactam (formerly AAI101) is a novel penicillanic sulfone β-lactamase inhibitor active against a wide range of ESBLs. The combination of enmetazobactam and cefepime has entered phase 3 development in patients with complicated urinary tract infections. Using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M23 tier 2 study design, broth microdilution MIC and disk diffusion quality control (QC) ranges were determined for cefepime-enmetazobactam. Enmetazobactam was tested at a fixed concentration of 8 μg/ml in the MIC assay, and a cefepime-enmetazobactam disk mass of 30/20 μg was used in the disk diffusion assay. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, E. coli ATCC 35218, E. coli NCTC 13353, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were chosen as reference strains. The CTX-M-15-producing E. coli NCTC 13353 isolate is recommended for routine testing to control for inhibition of ESBL activity by enmetazobactam. Broth microdilution MIC QC ranges spanned 3 to 4 doubling dilutions and contained 99.6% to 100.0% of obtained MIC values for the five reference strains. Disk diffusion yielded inhibition zone diameter QC ranges that spanned 7 mm and encompassed 97.1% to 100.0% of the obtained values. Quality control ranges were approved by the CLSI in 2017 (broth microdilution MIC) and 2019 (disk diffusion). The established QC ranges will ensure that appropriate assay performance criteria are attained using CLSI reference methodology when determining the susceptibility of clinical isolates to cefepime-enmetazobactam., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.)

Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 (tobramycin MIC = 0.064 µg/mL) was used to perform agar diffusion tests employing tobramycin-containing tablets. Bacterial growth and formation of inhibition zones were studied by stereomicroscopy and by blotting with microscope slides and staining with methylene blue, Alcian blue and a fluorescent lectin for the P. aeruginosa PSL, which was studied by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Diffusion of tobramycin from the deposit was modelled using a 3D geometric version of Fick's second law of diffusion. The time-dependent gradual increase in the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) was studied using a Calgary Biofilm Device. The early inhibition zone was visible after 5 h of incubation. The corresponding calculated tobramycin concentration at the border was 1.9 µg/mL, which increased to 3.2 µg/mL and 6.3 µg/mL after 7 h and 24 h, respectively. The inhibition zone increased to the stable final zone after 7 h of incubation. Bacterial growth and small aggregate formation (young biofilms) took place inside the inhibition zone until the small aggregates contained less than ca. 64 cells and production of polysaccharide matrix including PSL had begun; thereafter, the small bacterial aggregates were killed by tobramycin. Bacteria at the border of the stable inhibition zone and beyond continued to grow to a mature biofilm and produced large amount of polysaccharide-containing matrix. Formation of the inhibition zone during agar diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing is due to a switch from a planktonic to biofilm mode of growth and gives clinically important information about the increased antimicrobial tolerance of biofilms., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Leptospirosis is a global zoonotic disease caused by pathogenic bacteria of the Leptospira genus, which are fastidious, slow-growing organisms. Antimicrobial susceptibility data are limited; traditionally, the organisms have not been culturable on solid media. The recent development of Leptospira Vanaporn Wuthiekanun (LVW) agar, which facilitates rapid growth of Leptospira spp., provides the opportunity for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Eighty-three Leptospira spp. clinical isolates originating from patients in Laos between 2006 and 2016 were tested against six antimicrobials (azithromycin, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, gentamicin, and penicillin G) using disk diffusion on LVW agar. Quality control was undertaken using American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) reference strains with known susceptibilities on both standard media and LVW agar. All Leptospira spp. isolates produced large zones of inhibition around each of the six antimicrobials. All zones were greater than 25 mm: gentamicin produced the smallest zones (median 35 mm; interquartile range 30 mm-37 mm) and azithromycin produced the largest zones (median 85 mm; interquartile range 85 mm-85 mm). Zones produced by non-leptospiral ATCC reference strains on LVW agar were within 2 mm of accepted strain-specific quality control range on standard media. Antimicrobial activity on LVW agar appears to be similar to that on standard media. As there are no published susceptibility guidelines for the Leptospira genus, zone interpretation was subjective. Leptospira Vanaporn Wuthiekanun agar enabled antimicrobial susceptibility testing of multiple Leptospira isolates on solid media; the large zone sizes observed suggest that resistance has not emerged to these six antimicrobials in Lao Leptospira spp.