Search

Peripheral nerve injuries are often encountered in traumatological care. The aim of this manuscript is to provide initial data, experiences and performance reports from Germany in the implantation of acellular human nerve transplants in peripheral sensory nerve defects of the hand and to put these data in the context of a comprehensive review of the literature. Of the patients 4 (7 digital nerves) were examined 6 months postoperatively and 5 patients (6 digital nerves) were examined 1 year after the operation (3 were also at the 6‑month examination). All patients had a clinical improvement after nerve reconstruction (≥ S3 according to the classification of sensory recovery of the Medical Research Council modified by Mackinnon and Dellon). Disadvantages of our clinical study are the small number of patients, the inhomogeneity (primary and secondary nerve reconstruction) and the lack of comparison with other nerve reconstruction methods., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Introduction: If tensionless nerve coaptation is not possible, bridging the resulting peripheral nerve defect with an autologous nerve graft is still the current gold standard. The concept of conduits as an alternative with different materials and architectures, such as autologous vein conduits or bioartificial nerve conduits, could not replace the nerve graft until today. Chitosan, as a relatively new biomaterial, has recently demonstrated exceptional biocompatibility and material stability with neural lineage cells. The purpose of this prospective randomized clinical experiment was to determine the efficacy of chitosan-based nerve conduits in regenerating sensory nerves in the hand. Materials and methods: Forty-seven patients with peripheral nerve defects up to 26 mm distal to the carpal tunnel were randomized to receive either a chitosan conduit or an autologous nerve graft with the latter serving as the control group. Fifteen patients from the conduit group and seven patients from the control group were available for a 12-month follow-up examination. The primary outcome parameter was tactile gnosis measured with two-point discrimination. The secondary outcome parameters were Semmens Weinstein Monofilament Testing, self-assessed pain, and patient satisfaction. Results: Significant improvement (in static two-point discrimination) was observed six months after trauma (10.7 ± 1.2 mm; p < 0.05) for chitosan-based nerve conduits, but no further improvement was observed after 12 months of regeneration (10.9 ± 1.3 mm). After six months and twelve months, the autologous nerve graft demonstrated comparable results to the nerve conduit, with a static two-point discrimination of 11.0 ± 2.0 mm and 7.9 ± 1.1 mm. Semmes Weinstein Filament Testing in the nerve conduit group showed a continuous improvement over the regeneration period by reaching from 3.1 ± 0.3 after three months up to 3.7 ± 0.4 after twelve months. Autologous nerve grafts presented similar results: 3.3 ± 0.4 after three months and 3.7 ± 0.5 after twelve months. Patient satisfaction and self-reported pain levels were similar between the chitosan nerve conduit and nerve graft groups. One patient required revision surgery due to complications associated with the chitosan nerve tube. Conclusion: Chitosan-based nerve conduits are safe and suitable for bridging nerve lesions up to 26 mm in the hand. Tactile gnosis improved significantly during the early regeneration period, and functional outcomes were similar to those obtained with an autologous nerve graft. Thus, chitosan appears to be a sufficient substitute for autologous nerve grafts in the treatment of small nerve defects in the hand.

Objective: As suicide attempts by definition entail at least some threat to physical integrity and life, they theoretically qualify as an A1 criterion for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This study uses the unique opportunity of deep wrist injuries to quantify the effect of intentionality on PTSD rates by comparing suicide attempt survivors with patients who sustained accidental injuries similar in mechanism, localization, and extent., Method: Patients who had been admitted with an acute deep wrist injury from 2008 to 2016 filled out the revised Impact of Event Scale and reported other known PTSD risk factors. Mental morbidity and intentionality of the injury were determined by psychiatric consultation during the index hospitalization., Results: Fifty-one patients were followed up (72.5% male, 92.2% Caucasian, mean age at injury 42.3 ± 17.5 years, 72.5% accidental injuries), on average 4.2 ± 2.9 years after their injury. The intentionality of the injury alone predicted the severity of intrusions, avoidance, hyperarousal, and probable PTSD (aOR = 14.0)., Conclusions: Traumatization in the context of a suicide attempt may be a hitherto unknown PTSD risk factor. Patients after suicide attempts, especially medically serious attempts, should be monitored for PTSD symptoms., (© 2020 The Authors. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Suicidology.)

Background: Emergency capacities in the operating theatre are limited and often need to be split among surgical departments. Hand injuries often have to compete with other surgical disciplines for the availability of operating capacity. For this reason, an emergency classification was introduced to define a timespan in which the injury should be taken care of in the OR in order to enable the prioritizing of emergency cases in an interdisciplinary approach when capacities are scarce. However, neither valid data nor specific recommendations concerning the medical urgency of treatment or the forensic background of different hand injuries exist to this date., Purpose: This work describes how emergency classifications in Germany are applied to hand surgical cases and how certain hand injuries are prioritized among different hand surgeons., Material and Methods: An online survey was sent to all members of the German Society for Hand Surgery twice during a time span of several months. The survey featured questions on size and type of clinic or practice and requested an assessment of urgency levels for various hand injuries (immediately - within 2 h - within 6 h - within 12 h - within 24 h or elective care). The analysis of the questionnaire and graphic presentation was carried out using Excel., Results: 172 (25 %) out of 700 active members filled in the survey. Among the participants were members of university clinics, hospitals run by the German Statutory Accident Insurance, specialized clinics and primary care clinics. 15 % of participants work in a practice that offers hand-surgical treatment. First and foremost, maximum care hospitals with a hand surgical department participate in the treatment of hand injuries. 64 % of the hospitals use an emergency classification to enable the interdisciplinary prioritizing of surgical emergencies. The categorization of limb-threatening hand injuries appears to be very homogenous among participants whereas non-threatening injuries are assessed rather inconsistently., Conclusion: Emergency treatment of hand injuries primarily depends on available resources and surgical capacities. The assessment of urgency and severity of injuries additionally depends on experience and education. In order to maintain the ability to compete with other surgical disciplines for surgical capacities, a standard classification of hand surgical urgencies needs to be established. As valid data on the treatment of hand injuries are still missing, further studies need to evaluate possible outcomes in order to define the timespan in which surgery should take place., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Two therapeutic options for deep dermal hand burns are autologous split-thickness skin graft (STSG) following tangential excision and the application of the temporary wound dressing Suprathel following removal of burn blisters. We compared elasticity and perfusion of burn scars after both types of therapy at least one year after completion of treatment. A case series of 80 patients of our department with deep dermal hand burns between 2013 and 2018 was examined in the year 2019 at least one year after completion of treatment (24 females and 56 males with a median age of 47.6 years). The clinical assessment of the scar was performed with the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the objective assessment with suction cutometry (MPA 580) and an O2C device on both hands. Our statistical analysis showed no statistically significant differences for the R2 and R5 elasticity values between the two types of therapy. The 95% confidence intervals for the ratios of elasticity, and microcirculatory perfusion parameters and scar scale scores of burn scars to respective healthy areas of skin after STSG and Suprathel-therapy mostly covered 1. Subgroup analysis of R2 viscoelasticity and analyses with adjustments for scar compression therapy, nicotine consumption, age, palmar or dorsal localization of the burn scar and interactions of age with smoking and localization gave similar results. The adjusted analysis of SO2 showed statistically significant lower SO2 values, 9% less, after STSG compared to Suprathel treatment. Split-thickness skin graft following tangential excision and the application of Suprathel following removal of burn blisters may be equivalent options for treatment of deep dermal hand burns. To detect possible small differences, further studies with larger samples are required., Competing Interests: None., (IJBT Copyright © 2021.)

Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Background: Hand surgery in Germany has been subject to structural changes that strongly affect the balance between medicine and economics. On the one hand there is a shift of elective hand surgery from the inpatient to the outpatient sector. On the other hand - so our observations - emergency hand trauma cases are more concentrated in bigger hospitals. Given this background there is a lack of statistical data on the management of hand trauma care and treatment of patients with hand injuries. This article discusses a 10-year-analysis of hand traumatological cases treated at a maximum care hospital regarding epidemiological, structural and economic aspects., Material and Methods: Using a database query using ICD codes, inpatient hand trauma cases were identified between 2009-2018 and analyzed with regard to epidemiological and economic indicators (age, gender, comorbidities, case-mix-index (CMI), revenue, length of stay, length of surgery) using PIVOT tables. Patients under the age of 16 years, forearm fractures and intensive care patients were excluded., Results: In the study period the typical hand surgical trauma patient was male with an average age of 44 years. The Patient-Clinical-Complexity-Level (PCCL) was 0 in 80 % of all cases. The proportion of work-related injuries averaged around 25 %. The three top diagnose related groups (DRG) were the I32F (18.5 %), X01B (11.3 %) and the I32A (7.2 %). A striking point was the massive increase in the overall number of trauma cases over the years from approx. 300 cases in 2009 to over 1000 cases per year in 2018 with a shift of the main workload to on-call and night-shift hours away from core working times. In the study period 4 of 5 others hospitals located in a distance of 100 km reduced and stopped treatment of emergency hand cases. The average length of a hospital stay was approx. 4-5 days, the average cut/suture time less than 60 minutes and the average CMI 1.23. Those cases generate an average proceed of € 4370 in 2018, whereby the cases generated by the work-related injuries averaged € 387 less., Discussion: On the assumption that the number of emergency hand trauma cases did not really increase in the study period we think that there was a concentration of such cases in a few centres still providing extensive treatment for hand injuries while in smaller hospitals care for emergency hand trauma cases is progressively reduced. However, hand injuries may be worth a second thought for economic reasons because they can create reasonable revenues with rather little effort.If a critical number of patients is exceeded, costs of service provisions can be significantly amortized by the proceed generated by treatment. In those hospitals still taking care for acute hand injuries the workload especially in standby duty increased. What may have a negative input on the numbers of treated elective hand surgery cases., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)