KAYENTASUCHUS WALKERI SP. NOV. Etymology. In memory of Alick D. Walker for his many contributions to our understanding of Sphenosuchus and other archosaurs. Holotype. University of California Museum of Palaeontology (UCMP) 131830, a nearly complete but fragmented skeleton including an incomplete skull with articulated mandibular rami, articulated trunk region, articulated right ilium and femur, and other as yet unprepared postcranial bones. Type horizon and locality. Near the middle of the Kayenta Formation (Glen Canyon Group) in the ���silty facies��� of that unit (Clark & Fastovsky, 1986). Badlands at Willow Springs, Rock Head 7.5 Minute Quadrangle, NE Arizona, USA. Age: Early Jurassic (Sues et al., 1994). Diagnosis. Anterior process on maxilla projecting into well-developed, slit-like recess between premaxilla and maxilla. Outline of antorbital fenestra forming equilateral triangle. Squamosal descending along lateral edge of paroccipital process. Elongate mandibular symphysis with only minimal involvement of splenial. Dentary without enlarged anterior caniniform tooth and lacking teeth at anterior tip. Shares with Crocodyliformes presence of a groove along lateral edge of squamosal on dorsal surface. SKULL The skull of the specimen (Figs 3, 4) was compressed laterally during fossilization but otherwise appears undistorted. It broke into several fragments during excavation. The left side of the rostrum is wellpreserved and intact, and is preserved in articulation with the left dentary. The right nasal is preserved with this piece, but the fragmentary right maxilla, premaxilla and dentary and a large fragment of the frontals were recovered separately. The posterior portions of the right and left mandibular rami are also preserved separately. The dorsal part of the braincase and skull roof have been assembled from individual fragments into right and left halves, preserving most details; the ventral part of the prootic and part of the basisphenoid are preserved on the right side only. The snout (Fig. 3) is relatively deep and narrow; even allowing for distortion, it is at least four times higher than wide at the level of the antorbital fenestra. It is comparable in length to Sphenosuchus (Walker, 1990) and Dibothrosuchus (Wu & Chatterjee, 1993) and shorter than in Pseudhesperosuchus (Bonaparte, 1972a) and Terrestrisuchus (Crush, 1984). The external nares are terminal and laterally directed. They are divided by a bony bar composed of the nasals and premaxillae (although the premaxillary portion is no longer preserved). Each naris narrows posterodorsally and thus has a slightly oval outline. An antorbital fenestra is present just anterior to the orbit. It forms a roughly equilateral triangle in outline, with a vertical posterior margin, an horizontal dorsal edge, and an oblique anteroventral margin; the dorsal edge descends to a slight degree anteriorly. The maxilla forms the ventral margin, the lacrimal the posterior, and the two bones meet midway along the dorsal edge; the jugal may enter into the posterior margin of the fenestra, but, if this is indeed the case, it forms only a very small part of that margin. The fenestra, which is about one third the length of the maxilla, is relatively shorter than in Saltoposuchus and Pseudhesperosuchus, but is similar in length to the opening in Sphenosuchus and Dibothrosuchus. Its shape differs from that in the latter, which is more nearly circular, and those of the other three, which are more elongate and oval. A fossa is present in the maxilla anterior to the fenestra. The squamosals are broadened to form a ���skull table��� as in crocodyliforms, but, unlike the flat surface of crocodyliform squamosals, that of Kayentasuchus bends ventrally lateral to the quadrate and faces laterally. This may be due to some extent to lateral compression during fossilization, but a ridge along the edge of the occiput at the bend in the squamosal indicates that the bend is natural. The supratemporal fenestrae are relatively elongate, similar in length to those of other sphenosuchians except for Dibothrosuchus, in which the fenestrae are shorter. The fenestrae of Kayentasuchus are much longer than wide, and although this has been accentuated by the lateral compression of the specimen the original dimensions could not have been significantly different from the observed condition. The post-temporal fenestra is small but is not absent (as in Dibothrosuchus). It lies at the junction of the squamosal, parietal, otoccipital, and supraoccipital. This area is crushed on the better preserved left side of the skull, but the smooth ventral edge of the fenestra is present on the right side. On the left side the squamosal appears to form a groove which enters the lateral edge of the fenestra, but this may be due to crushing. The surfaces of most of the skull bones, with the exception of the frontal and squamosal, are smooth and devoid of sculpturing. The dorsal surface of the frontal bears weakly developed pitting along the midline. The squamosal is rugose near its lateral edge. The sculpturing composed of small pits and grooves typical of crocodyliform cranial bones is absent. The premaxilla is a small and slender bone forming most of the border of the external naris (Fig. 3). A slender posterodorsal process overlies the nasal and maxilla in what appears to be a weak suture behind the naris, rather than abutting against them as in crocodylians. The body of the premaxilla forms the anterior edge of a laterally open notch between it and the maxilla; this edge is gently convex posteriorly, and the premaxilla and maxilla do not meet below the notch. A process must have ascended from the anterior part of the premaxilla near the midline to form the ventral half of the internarial bar, but it has been broken away. The premaxillae meet only at the tip of the rostrum and do not meet posterior to the incisive foramen, so they do not form part of the secondary bony palate. The nasals form the dorsal surface of the snout between the naris and the frontals. Each extends anteriorly to form the posterodorsal half of the internarial bar, although the tips are broken off. The nasal borders the maxilla and lacrimal along their medial edges, and this contact is straight. Between the level of the antorbital fenestra and the nares, the lateral part of the nasal is bent ventrolaterally and faces dorsolaterally. A longitudinal ridge occurs where the bone bends. More posteriorly, the entire bone faces dorsally and meets the frontal at the level of the anterior end of the orbit. It presumably also contacted the prefrontal in this region, but neither prefrontal has been preserved on the rostral fragment. The nasal does not form any part of the fossa associated with the antorbital fenestra. The maxilla forms most of the facial region of the snout as well as a short secondary bony palate (Fig. 3). Its facial portion is vertical. The length of the maxilla is more than twice its maximum height. It is lower anteriorly and gradually increases in depth posteriorly. The combined length of the antorbital fossa and fenestra is approximately one-half that of the maxilla. The fossa has the same shape as the fenestra but is longer anteriorly and shorter posteriorly. The anterior end of the fossa narrows to a rounded end opposite the sixth tooth. The anterior tip of the fossa enters into a large foramen which communicates with the interior surface of the maxilla. The anterior edge of the maxilla forms the posterior part of the notch with the premaxilla and has a short anterior process that projects into the notch. The dorsal part of the maxilla contacts the lacrimal half way along the dorsal edge of the antorbital fenestra and at the posteroventral angle of the fenestra. The full extent of the contact between the maxilla and jugal is not obvious on the specimen, but most of it lies ventral to the lacrimal so that the maxilla does not extend posteriorly beneath the orbit. At its contact with the jugal the ventrolateral part of the maxilla has a thin lamina which ascends dorsally to overlie part of the jugal, although the jugal overlies the maxilla along most of the contact. The ventral border of the maxilla is straight, lacking the ���festooning��� commonly found in crocodyliforms. Small neurovascular foramina are present on the lateral surface of the maxilla dorsal to the tooth row; there are slightly fewer foramina than teeth. The anterior halves of the maxillae form a secondary bony palate, which extends back to the level of the sixth maxillary tooth. From here it continues posteriorly as a narrow palatal shelf. The palatine contacts the maxilla posterior to this narrow shelf. The ventral surface of the secondary palate is covered with many tiny pits in a pattern similar to that seen on the occipital surface of the squamosal. At the midline, the bone rises dorsally to form a longitudinal ridge along the dorsal surface of the secondary palate. Slightly posterior to the secondary bony palate, a ridge arises from the dorsal surface of the palatal shelf and ascends a short distance anterodorsally onto the medial surface of the facial part of the maxilla; possibly soft tissue forming the dorsal roof of the narial passage attached to this ridge. The vomer articulates bluntly with the maxilla at the posterodorsal edge of the secondary bony palate along the midline. The vertically oriented lacrimal separates the antorbital fenestra and orbit (Fig. 3). Most of the left element is preserved on the rostral fragment except for its posterodorsal part near the contact with the prefrontal. The ventral portion of the lacrimal is vertical and forms the posterior border of the antorbital fenestra and the anterior border of the orbit. The dorsal portion of the bone is horizontal and extends anteriorly dorsal to the antorbital fenestra. It is narrow, as in Sphenosuchus, rather than having a broad ventral lamina extending into the antorbital fossa, as in Pseudhesperosuchus (Bonaparte, 1972a) and Terrestrisuchus (Crush, 1984). The ventral part of the lacrimal is gently concave posteriorly and gently convex anteriorly. It bears a thin vertical ridge on its lateral surface and broadens medially. The lacrimal broadens ventrally at the contact with the maxilla (and possibly jugal), and it may also meet the palatine in this area. The contact between the lacrimal and prefrontal is not preserved. The posterior entrance of the lacrimal canal could not be identified. The jugal is represented only by the anterior end of the left element lying beneath the orbit. It is relatively narrow compared with that of crocodylians. Its contact with the lacrimal is not evident, but it clearly did not ascend far dorsally as in some basal archosaurs. The medial surface of the anterior end is concave, wrapping around the posterior end of the maxilla. The squamosal lies at the posterolateral corner of the upper temporal region, extending laterally over the quadrate. It is thin and similar to that of Saltoposuchus (Sereno & Wild, 1992) and Terrestrisuchus (Crush, 1984). Laterally, it bends downward so that this part of the bone is orientated vertically (Fig. 3). This may be partly owing to the lateral compression of the fossil, but the shape of the occipital portion of the bone suggests that the bend is for the most part a natural feature. The border of the occipital portion of the bone has a smoothly curved edge that follows the bend in the body of the bone, so that, had the body of the bone been essentially horizontal before crushing, the fragmentation of the occiput would have been more severe. The medial part of the squamosal also bends downward abruptly along the lateral edge of the supratemporal fenestra, although a true descending process as seen in primitive archosaurs and dinosaurs is absent. This portion of the bone is relatively short and of an even height throughout. The contact between the quadrate and squamosal lies along this part of the bone. Anteriorly, lateral to the supratemporal fenestra, this contact is a lap joint, with the squamosal lying medial to the quadrate. Posteriorly, in the area where the quadrate contacts the prootic, the quadrate abuts directly against the ventral surface of the squamosal, although there is a small ventral extension of the squamosal lateral to the quadrate. The dorsal part of the quadrate continues posteriorly beneath the squamosal to contact the anterior surface of its occipital part. There is no indication of a socket within the squamosal for the quadrate, as in Sphenosuchus (Walker, 1990) and more primitive archosaurs. As in crocodyliforms (with the exception of Eopneumatosuchus; Crompton & Smith, 1980), the anterior part of the quadrate is not sutured to the squamosal, but merely underlies it. However, a break in the right squamosal reveals that, unlike in crocodyliforms, the quadrate is not sutured to the squamosal posterior to the supratemporal fenestra. The anteroposterior development of the quadrate beneath the squamosal suggests that little, if any, movement was possible along this contact, especially in an anteroposterior direction. The occipital portion of the squamosal (Fig. 3) is extensive, being equal in height to the supraoccipital bone. It descends ventrally along the posterior surface of the paroccipital process to opposite the dorsal border of the foramen magnum. Its ventral edge is straight and horizontal. The squamosal appears to underlie the parietal posteriorly on the occipital surface. The two bones meet along an extensive contact so that the squamosal has no, or a very slight, contact with the supraoccipital. In posterior view, the contact between the squamosal and parietal is oblique, extending ventromedially from the dorsal surface of the skull. The occipital surface of the squamosal is covered with tiny pits. The lateral surface of the squamosal is broadest posteriorly, its ventral edge being orientated obliquely at an angle of about 45 ��. The occipital portion of the squamosal extends ventrally along the lateral edge of the paroccipital process to cover its lateral surface. The lateral edge of the squamosal on the occiput forms a strong ridge that extends posteriorly. It has a rough surface, especially dorsally. The lateral surface of the squamosal is sculptured in a complex pattern. The area along the anteroventral edge is roughened, and a low ridge is developed paralleling this roughness posterodorsally. Together these two features form a groove extending most of the length of the bone (Fig. 3). Anteriorly, this groove extends onto the dorsal surface of the bone as the descending portion of the bone gradually narrows. The ridges and groove terminate posteriorly opposite the level of the occiput where the groove turns downward and reaches the ventral edge of the bone. The groove may have served for the attachment of muscles for an ear flap as in extant crocodylians (Shute & Bellairs, 1955). A raised area is situated within the groove at its posterior end, as seen on the right side. Posterior to the groove, the lateral surface of the squamosal is roughened in a more regular pattern. The contact between the parietal and squamosal posterior to the supratemporal fenestra on the dorsal surface of the skull is very short, especially in comparison with crocodyliforms. It is less than one quarter the length of the squamosal, compared to about half the length of the squamosal in crocodylians. The squamosal does not appear to border the anterior temporal foramen (for the passage of a. temporo-orbitalis) as it does in Dibothrosuchus and crocodyliforms. The contact of the squamosal with the postorbital is not preserved. The parietals appear to be fused, but this is difficult to determine with certainty because they have separated along the midline and the contact surface is damaged. Anteriorly, they appear to have separated along an open suture, but posteriorly the break is not directly through the midline and no suture is apparent. It is possible that, as in Litargosuchus, the parietals were fused posteriorly but suturally separated more anteriorly. The anterior end of the bone is missing from the braincase pieces, but a fragment containing the anterior end of the left parietal and the posterior end of the frontal is preserved. In dorsal view, the parietal broadens posteriorly and, to a lesser extent, anteriorly; thus the lateral edge of the bone is concave where it borders the supratemporal fenestra. Anteriorly, near the frontal contact, the lateral edges become parallel. The parietal is similar in length to that of Sphenosuchus, Saltoposuchus, Terrestrisuchus, and Pseudhesperosuchus. A distinct rugose ridge along the lateral edge of the parietal clearly marks the dorsal limit of m. adductor mandibulae within the supratemporal fenestra. These ridges are separated by a broad expanse of bone on the skull roof, in contrast with Sphenosuchus and Dibothrosuchus in which a very narrow sagittal crest is formed along the dorsal midline. The dorsomedial surface is broadly rounded transversely, and the lateral edge of the dorsal surface is turned upward. The parietal extends ventrally from its lateral ridge to meet the endochondral bones of the braincase (Fig. 4). It contacts the laterosphenoid ventrally along the medial surface of the supratemporal fenestra, and in this area the lateral surface of the parietal is relatively flat. Posterior to the supratemporal fenestra the parietal contacts the prootic. Here its lateral surface is concave, with the ventral edge flaring laterally at the prootic contact. The parietal contacts the supraoccipital at the posterior end of the braincase, where it entirely overlies the supraoccipital dorsally. The extensive occipital portion of the parietal (Fig. 4) is wedge-shaped, thinning ventrally. It has broad contacts with the squamosal laterally and the supraoccipital medially on the occiput, and it has only limited (if any) ventral contact with the otoccipital. In dorsal view, the posterior edge of the parietal is concave posteriorly. The area dorsal to the supraoccipital is strongly concave, but flattens out laterally. The frontals roof the orbits. They are incompletely preserved; the medial parts of both bones are preserved together as an isolated fragment, and the posterior region of the left frontal forms another isolated fragment with the anterior part of the left parietal. The parietal extends anterolaterally along the edge of the supratemporal fenestra to separate it from the frontal. The ridge on the dorsal midline of the parietal continues anteriorly onto the frontals. The ridge becomes broader anteriorly, and its surface is slightly sculptured with narrow grooves. The lateral portion of the frontals is not preserved, but the broken edges are thinner than the medial part of the bones. Thus it is likely that the frontals are similar to those of Sphenosuchus and Hesperosuchus (Walker, 1970) in having depressions lateral to a midline ridge. The frontals of Kayentasuchus lack the three longitudinal ridges on their dorsal surface that are diagnostic for Dibothrosuchus (Wu & Chatterjee, 1993). The ventral surface of the frontals is poorly preserved, but the cristae cranii bordering the olfactory tracts were well-developed. A single small foramen marks the frontal lateral to the right crista. A fragment underlying the right nasal is probably part of the frontal, so that, Published as part of Clark, James M. & Sues, Hans-Dieter, 2002, Two new basal crocodylomorph archosaurs from the Lower Jurassic and the monophyly of the Sphenosuchia, pp. 77-95 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 136 (1) on pages 82-90, DOI: 10.1046/j.1096-3642.2002.00026.x, http://zenodo.org/record/4634400, {"references":["Clark JM, Fastovsky DE. 1986. Vertebrate biostratigraphy of the Glen Canyon Group in northern Arizona. In: Padian K, ed. The Beginning of the Age of Dinosaurs: Faunal Change across the Triassic - Jurassic Boundary. New York: Cambridge University Press, 285 - 301.","Sues H-D, Clark JM, Jenkins FA Jr. 1994. A review of the Early Jurassic tetrapods from the Glen Canyon Group of the American Southwest. In: Fraser NC, Sues H-D, eds. The Shadow of the Dinosaurs: Early Mesozoic Tetrapods. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 284 - 294.","Walker AD. 1990. A revision of Sphenosuchus acutus Haughton, a crocodylomorph reptile from the Elliot Formation (late Triassic or early Jurassic) of South Africa. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 330: 1 - 120.","Wu X-C, Chatterjee S. 1993. Dibothrosuchus elaphros, a crocodylomorph from the Lower Jurassic of China and the phylogeny of the Sphenosuchia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 13: 58 - 89.","Bonaparte JF. 1972 a. Los tetrapodos del sector superior de la Formacion Los Colorados, La Rioja, Argentina. Opera Lilloana 22: 1 - 183.","Crush PJ. 1984. A late upper Triassic sphenosuchid crocodilian from Wales. Palaeontology 27: 131 - 157.","Sereno PC, Wild R. 1992. Procompsognathus: theropod, ' thecodont' or both? Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 12: 435 - 458.","Crompton AW, Smith KK. 1980. A new genus and species of crocodilian from the Kayenta Formation (Late Triassic?) of Northern Arizona. In: Jacobs LL, ed. Aspects of Vertebrate History. Flagstaff: Museum of Northern Arizona Press, 193 - 217.","Shute CCD, Bellairs A. 1955. The external ear in Crocodilia. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 124: 741 - 749.","Walker AD. 1970. A revision of the Jurassic reptile Hallopus victor (Marsh), with remarks on the classification of crocodiles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 257: 323 - 372.","Clark JM, Sues H-D, Berman DS. 2001. A new specimen of Hesperosuchus agilis from the Upper Triassic of New Mexico and the interrelationships of basal crocodylomorph archosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 20: 683 - 704.","Busbey AB III. 1989. Form and function of the jaw apparatus of Alligator mississippiensis. Journal of Morphology 202: 99 - 127.","Romer AS. 1923. Crocodilian pelvic muscles and their avian and reptilian homologues. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 48: 533 - 552.","Hutchinson JR. 2001. The evolution of femoral osteology and soft tissues on the line to extant birds (Neornithes). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 131: 169 - 197."]}