Search

PDF file - 339K, Flow cytometry histograms of serial levels of p-ERK and p-mTOR in patient samples.

Purpose: The clinical relevance of targeting the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, activated in 70% to 80% of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), is unknown.Experimental Design: Selumetinib is an oral small-molecule inhibitor of MAP–ERK kinase (MEK)-1/2. Forty-seven patients with relapsed/refractory AML or 60 years old or more with untreated AML were enrolled on a phase II study. Patients were stratified by FLT3 ITD mutation status. The primary endpoint was response rate (complete, partial, and minor). Leukemia cells were analyzed for extracellular signal—regulated kinase (ERK) and mTOR phosphorylation.Results: Common drug-related toxicities were grade 1–2 diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and skin rash. In the FLT3 wild-type cohort, six of 36 (17%) patients had a response [one partial response, three minor responses, two unconfirmed minor responses (uMR)]. No patient with FLT3 ITD responded. NRAS and KRAS mutations were detected in 7% and 2% of patients, respectively. The sole patient with KRAS mutation had uMR with hematologic improvement in platelets. Baseline p-ERK activation was observed in 85% of patients analyzed but did not correlate with a response. A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs3733542 in exon 18 of the KIT gene was detected in significantly higher number of patients with response/stable disease compared with nonresponders (60% vs. 23%; P = 0.027).Conclusions: Selumetinib is associated with modest single-agent antileukemic activity in advanced AML. However, given its favorable toxicity profile, combination with drugs that target other signaling pathways in AML should be considered. The potential association of SNP rs3733542 in exon 18 of the KIT gene with antileukemic activity of selumetinib is intriguing, but will require validation in larger trials. Clin Cancer Res; 20(2); 490–8. ©2013 AACR.

PDF file - 50K, Primers for KIT gene mutation testing.

261 Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus either Abiraterone, Docetaxel or Enzalutamide (ADE) improves overall survival (OS) of men with metastatic M1 castrate-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), compared to ADT alone and is currently standard of care. Men with mCSPC with a point mutation of the speckle-type pox virus and zinc finger mutation (mutSPOP) derive superior response to ADT compared to wild type SPOP. The additive benefit of ADE to ADT in this subclass of CSPC is unclear. We sought to evaluate the benefit of therapy in patients with mutSPOP in a real-world setting. Methods: Between November 2017 and July 2022, 1002, patients in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) health system with advanced prostate cancer had tumor specimens examined by next generation sequencing (NGS). Of these patients, we retrospectively identified 70 mCSPC patients with mutSPOP. Patient records were reviewed to determine baseline characteristics, therapy for CSPC, subsequent therapy for Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC), and clinical outcome. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) for patients who received ADT alone or ADT plus ADE. PFS was defined as time to either PSA progression by PCWG2 criteria, clinical progression, or time to next line of therapy. Results: Median age for the 70 patients with mutSPOP was 75 years (range 50-91). Thirty-six (51%) were non-Hispanic white; 11 (16%) were African American; and 13 (19%) were Asian. F133 was the most frequently mutated allele (64%), TP53 was the most common co-mutated gene (27%), and mutations in MSH2, MSH6 and BRCA1 were identified in one patient each. Two patients had concurrent ERG fusion. Thirty-six patients (51%) had a Gleason score 8-10 and 48 (69%) were diagnosed with de-novo metastatic disease. Twenty-seven patients (39%) received ADT alone, 41 (59%) received ADT + ADE, 2 patients elected observation only. PFS was 28.1 months (mos) for ADT alone vs 35 for ADT+ADE (p=0.08). Twenty-nine patients (41%) received 2nd line therapy at CRPC; among them 24 received ADT plus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide. Median PFS for all the CRPC patients who received 2nd line treatment was 15mos. Median PFS for CRPC patients who received 2nd line treatment with Abiraterone, or Enzalutamide was 15.3 mos. Median overall survival for the entire group was 173 mos (95% CI 135-NR). Conclusions: In this real-world study within KPNC, we confirmed the durable benefit of ADT based therapy in patients with mutSPOP. Patients with mutSPOP derived similar benefit regardless of 1st line therapy (ADT vs ADT + ADE). We also noted durable responses to abiraterone or enzalutamide for CRPC after initial treatment with ADE for CSPC. Confirmation of these findings from an another large NGS database is ongoing and will be reported later.

PURPOSE To examine the association of gain-of-function (GOF) and non–gain-of-function (non-GOF) TP53 mutations with prognosis of metastatic right-sided (RCC) versus left-sided colorectal cancer (LCC). METHODS This cohort study included patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who had next-generation sequencing performed from November 2017 to January 2021. We defined R175H, R248W, R248Q, R249S, R273H, R273L, and R282W as GOF and all other mutp53 as non-GOF. We used Cox regression modeling to examine the association between GOF and non-GOF mutp53 and overall survival (OS), adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, performance status, Charlson comorbidity index and receipt of chemotherapy. RESULTS Of total 1,043 patients, 735 had tumors with mutp53 and 308 had wild-type p53 (wtp53). GOF was associated with worse OS than non-GOF mutp53 only in LCC (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.66 [95% CI, 1.20 to 2.29]), but not in RCC (HR = 0.79 [95% CI, 0.49 to 1.26]). Importantly, RCC was associated with worse OS than LCC only in the subset of patients whose CRC carried non-GOF (HR = 1.76 [95% CI, 1.30 to 2.39]), but not GOF mutp53 (HR = 0.92 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.53]) or wtp53 (HR = 0.88 [95% CI, 0.60 to 1.28]). These associations were largely unchanged after also adjusting for RAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations, and microsatellite instability-high. CONCLUSION Poorer survival of patients with metastatic RCC versus LCC appeared to be restricted to the subset with non-GOF mutp53, whereas GOF versus non-GOF mutp53 was associated with poorer survival only among patients with LCC. This approach of collectively classifying mutp53 into GOF and non-GOF provides new insight for prognostic stratification and for understanding the mechanism of sidedness-dependent prognosis. If confirmed, future CRC clinical trials may benefit from incorporating this approach.

e16294 Background: Developmentally pancreas head derives from ventral bud while pancreas neck, body and tail derive from dorsal bud. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) frequently harbors multiple mutations including KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and others. It is unknown how TP53 gain-of-function (GOF) and non-gain-of-function (non-GOF) mutations affect the prognosis. Methods: We retrospectively examined a cohort of 741 Kaiser Permanente (KP) patients with locally advanced/metastatic PDAC who had NGS performed to determine the association of KRAS (mutKRAS), TP53 (mutp53) and CDKN2A (mutCDKN2A) mutations (individually and in combination) with overall survival (OS). We used Cox modeling to estimate hazard ratios (HR) adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, performance status, Charlston Comorbidity Index, chemotherapy received, anatomic location and co-mutations. We also analyzed the TCGA PDAC dataset to examine the association of OS with these same mutations. Results: In the KP cohort, patient ages ranged from 36 to 94 years and approximately 50% were female. In 384 patients PDAC was on the head, and 357 patients had PDAC on a non-head location (neck, body, and tail). Those with head PDAC had modestly better OS compared to non-head PDAC (HR = 0.87), and this appeared to be driven by the subsets of patients with wtp53 (HR = 0.68), with wtKRAS (HR = .74) and with wtCDKN2A (HR = .78). Approximately 67.5% of patients had mutp53, 89.2% had mutKRAS and 44.8% had mutCDKN2A. Among all KP patients, OS was similar for patients with mutp53 vs. wtp53 (HR = 1.05); worse for patients with mutKRAS vs. wtKRAS (HR = 1.26), and worse for patients with mutCDKN2 vs. wtCDKN2A (HR = 1.51). Interestingly, among patients with a GOF mutp53, those with mutCDKN2A had substantially worse OS vs patients with wtCDKN2A (HR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.46-4.50). In contrast, among patients with a non-GOF mutp53, patients with mutCDKN2A had only moderately worse OS compared to patients with wtCDKN2A (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.06-1.79). Analysis of the TCGA PDAC dataset showed that the number of mutations (0, 1, 2, or 3, of p53, KRAS and CDKN2A) was associated with incrementally worse OS ( p < .001). Conclusions: Better OS of head vs. non-head PDAC was primarily driven by patients with wtp53, wtKRAS, and wtCDKN2A. The adverse effect of mutCDKN2A on OS appears to be most pronounced in patients with GOF mutp53. Our TCGA analysis suggests interactions among TP53, KRAS and CDKN2A mutations in affecting PDAC survival.

Purpose Metastatic cancers of unknown primary or with unclear diagnoses pose diagnostic and management challenges, often leading to poor outcomes. Studies of the 92-gene assay have demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy compared with standard pathology techniques and improved survival in patients treated on the basis of assay results. The current study assessed the clinical impact of the 92-gene assay on diagnostic and treatment decisions for patients with unknown or uncertain diagnoses. Methods Patients in this prospective, multi-institutional, decision-impact study included those for whom the 92-gene assay was ordered as part of routine care. Participating physicians completed electronic case report forms that contained standardized, specialty-specific questionnaires. Data collection included patient and tumor characteristics and clinical history. The key study objective of clinical impact was calculated on the basis of changes in final diagnosis and treatment after testing. Results Data collection included 444 patients, 107 physicians (73 oncologists and 34 pathologists), and 28 sites. Molecular diagnoses from 22 different tumor types and subtypes across all cases were provided in 95.5% of patients with a reportable result (n = 397). Physicians reported that the 92-gene assay was used broadly for diagnostic dilemmas that ranged from single suspected tumor type (29%) to a differential diagnosis of two or more suspected tumor types (30%) or cancers of unknown primary (41%). Integration of 92-gene assay results led to a change in the recommended treatment in 47% of patients. Conclusion Findings from this clinical utility study demonstrate that the 92-gene assay led to a change in treatment decisions in every other patient case. These data additionally define the role of this assay in clinical practice and strongly support the consideration of molecular tumor typing in the diagnosis and treatment planning of patients with metastatic cancer with unknown or uncertain diagnosis.

Retrospective review of the safety and efficacy of high-dose methotrexate for prevention of CNS relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at Kaiser Permanente- Northern California (Jan 2015 - June 2019) Background: Central nervous system (CNS) relapse occurs in 10-12% of high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Prophylactic intravenous high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is recommended by international guidelines to reduce this risk despite limited evidence to support such practice. Recent retrospective studies have cast doubt on the clinical benefit of such treatment. There is limited data on safety and efficacy of such treatment in a community oncology setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adults ≥ 18 years diagnosed with DLBCL treated with systemic therapy and HD-MTX as CNS prophylaxis at Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 1/2015 - 6/2019. We abstracted patient demographics, clinical information, treatment, toxicity, and health care utilization from the electronic health record. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate patients' outcomes. Results: Of 33 patients (median age: 61; range: 23 - 81; age ≥ 60: 57.5%), most had stage IV disease (78.7%) and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 (66.5%). Patients with CNS-IPI score of 2-3 (intermediate-risk) was 30.3%, while higher CNS-IPI scores of 4-6 (high-risk) was 51.5%. Other patient characteristics include double hit lymphoma (12.1%), kidney/adrenal gland involvement (33%), and/or epidural involvement (24.2%). Most common therapies were R-CHOP (51.5%) and R-EPOCH (27.2%). The median number of HD-MTX doses was 3 (range 1-4). The median cumulative dose was 7 gm/m2 (range 3-10.5). With regards to the treatment schedule, 63.6% received HD-MTX intercalated with systemic chemotherapy and 36.4% received HD-MTX after completion of preplanned treatment. Overall, renal toxicity was the most common adverse side effect. The rates of grade 1, 2 and 3 renal toxicity were 12.1%, 9% and 6%, respectively. Other notable side effects experienced were neutropenic fever requiring hospitalization (27.2%) and grade 3 transaminitis (6%). No patients experienced grade 3 mucositis. The median duration of hospital stay was 12 days (range 4-37) and 12.1% required suspension of future HD-MTX. With a median follow up of 31.3 months (range: 0.79 - 58.4) 69.6% are alive and 15.1% had CNS relapse despite prophylactic HD-MTX. Conclusions: In this community oncology setting, patients with DLBCL who were deemed high risk for CNS relapse and received HD-MTX for prophylaxis experienced similar CNS relapse rate compared to those who did not in previous studies. Our findings are in line with recent retrospective reviews, which further support the lack of benefit of such prophylactic treatment. This study underscores the need for further research to prevent CNS disease and improved patient selection criteria for prophylactic treatment among high risk DLBCL patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

e15578 Background: TP53 tumor suppressor gene is mutated in approximately 50% of colorectal cancer (CRC). How TP53 mutations are associated with the prevalence of the other common genomic alterations such as RAS (KRAS/NRAS), BRAF, PI3KCA, as well as microsatellite stability (MSI) is not clear. Methods: We investigated the impact of TP53 mutations on other common genomic alterations and survival in patients with metastatic CRC using the NGS data within Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC). Results: From November 2017 to January 2021, genomic profiling was performed on 1056 patients with metastatic CRC, of whom 740 patients harbored a TP53 mutation (TP53mut) and 316 patients had wild-type TP53 (TP53wt). We found that median overall survival (OS) was similar between the TP53wt and TP53mut patients (50.1 vs 47.5 months, p = 0.9), however, the percent with a Ras mutation was significantly higher in patients with TP53wt compared to TP53mut (63.2 vs 45.2%, p = 0.0001). Interestingly, the percent with MSI-high was also significantly higher in TP53wt than TP53mut patients (11.1 vs 1.4%, p = 0.0001), however, the response rate of the MSI-high patients to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) was similar (40 vs 37.5%). In addition, a significantly higher percent of patients with TP53wt had PI3KCA mutations and a significantly lower percent had c-Myc amplifications compared to patients with TP53mut (PI3KCA, 32 vs 10.7%, p = 0.0001; c-Myc, 1.26 vs 4.6%, p = 0.008). There was no significant difference in the percent of BRAF mutations between the two patient populations (6.2 vs 9.8%). A significantly higher percent of patients with TP53wt and a PI3KCA mutation had a Ras mutation compared to patients with TP53mut and a PI3KCA mutation (81.2 vs 57%, p = 0.0004). However, TP53 mutation status was not significantly associated with the OS of patients with either a Ras, or BRAF, or PI3KCA mutation, or combination of Ras and PI3KCA mutations. Conclusions: TP53 mutation is associated with decreased prevalence of Ras, PI3KCA mutation and MSI-high in patients with metastatic CRC, however, without impacting the OS or response rate to ICI.

3585 Background: TP53 mutation is present in approximately 50% of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). The spectrum of the TP53 mutations is extremely broad including approximately 80% missense mutations. Several missense mutations have been found to possess gain-of-function (GOF) properties in cell line and animal studies, however, confirmation of the concept of GOF in human malignancies is still lacking. Methods: We investigated the impact of TP53 GOF mutations in patients with metastatic CRC using the NGS data within Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), a large integrated healthcare system. Results: From November 2017 to January 2021, genomic profiling by StrataNGS was performed on 8658 patients, with 1056 patients being metastatic CRC, among whom 740 patients harbored a TP53 mutation (TP53mut) and 316 patients had wild-type TP53 (TP53wt). Ras (KRAS and NRAS) and BRAF mutation appropriately discriminated the overall survival (OS) of patient populations with either TP53wt or TP53mut, confirming the validity of our dataset. We identified seven GOF TP53 mutations (R175H, R248W, R248Q, R249S, R273H, R273L, R282W) in these CRC patients. We show that different GOF mutation differentially impacts the OS. Patients whose CRC harbored TP53mut R248W, R249S, and R282W (poor prognostic TP53mut, N = 47) had significantly worse OS versus patients whose CRC harbored TP53mut R248Q, R175H, R273H and R273L (N = 160, median OS 29.4 vs 44.2 months, HR 0.47, p = 0.007). The OS of the poor prognostic TP53mut patients was also significantly inferior compared to patients whose CRC harbored all other TP53 mutations (N = 1099, median OS 50.1 months, HR 0.55, p = 0.01) or TP53wt (N = 316, median OS 47,5 months, HR 0.54, p = 0.01). The demographics and the percent of Ras, BRAF, and PI3KCA mutations were similar except that the patients with the poor prognostic TP53mut had significantly higher percent of Ras mutation compared to the rest of the GOF TP53mut patients (p = 0.035). When compared to R248Q alone, R248W confers worse OS (median OS 36.3 vs 63.2 months, p = 0.05). Conclusions: Our data suggest that different TP53 GOF mutations are associated with very different clinical outcomes. Additional studies identifying specific TP53 GOF mutations that impact outcomes may provide further insight for drug development and clinical trial design.

e19185 Background: The importance of NGS testing to help guide oncologic therapy decisions has grown over time, presenting a unique challenge for community oncologists to properly translate the NGS test results to treatment (Tx) recommendations for patients. Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) is a large, integrated health care system providing comprehensive primary and specialty care to 4.4 million members, with over 4000 patients (pts) diagnosed with advanced cancer each year. NGS testing at KPNC is performed in a collaboration with Strata Oncology, that provides systematized comprehensive NGS testing (StrataNGS) paired with a portfolio of genomically guided clinical trials. Methods: KPNC has established workflows for upfront empiric review of all NGS results by our KPNC Genomic Oncology Committee (GOC), that includes representatives from medical oncology subspecialists, genetics, pathology, and clinical trials. KPNC GOC reviews all StrataNGS test results in our KPNC network to identify patients that might benefit from either a clinical trial, appropriate on or off-label drug options and/or genetic counseling. In addition, GOC conducts an in-depth case review per request of the treating oncologist. A study nurse pre-screens all pts whose results match to a trial for eligibility. Results: The numbers of pts tested with StrataNGS has increased over time with around 300 pts tested monthly and 4,977 NGS tests performed since Nov 2017. Median age was 65.2 (Range 18.5-96.0). About 42.4% of Pts were non-white. Approximately, 39% of Pts had an actionable mutation including 21.7% eligible for a promising in or out of network trial. 1.6% and 10.9% pts were potentially eligible for off- or on-label approved drugs, respectively. 4.9% were recommended to receive genetic counseling. The 3 most frequently sequenced cancers were: lung, colon and breast. Conclusions: KPNC is providing systematic subspecialty review and management of NGS results for pts in a community setting. Our approach has allowed for greater adoption of routine NGS testing, especially for rare cancer types with less effective standard Tx options available. This model also helps accrual to genomic-based drug trials that have been a challenge for the field. Workflows to streamline automated centralized acquisition of prior Tx history and analysis of response to therapy are in development.

1517 Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) for tumor molecular profiling is used in Oncology to identify ‘actionable alterations’ for clinical trials or on/ off-label therapy. Tumor NGS can also reveal potentially heritable germline mutations. The frequency of such incidental germline mutations has been estimated to be 4-15%. The 2015 ASCO Statement supports communication of medically relevant incidental germline findings from somatic mutation profiling to patients (PTS). The impact of tumor NGS testing on hereditary cancer risk assessment programs in the context of a wider population management strategy is unknown. We sought to evaluate this within our Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) population with ready access to tumor NGS and an ongoing hereditary cancer risk assessment program. Methods: Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) is part of a large, integrated health care system. NGS at KPNC is performed in collaboration with STRATA Oncology, a precision oncology partnership. All NGS results are reviewed by a multidisciplinary KPNC Genomic Oncology Committee (GOC)which also includes genetic counselors and pathologists. We examined all NGS reports between November 2017 through December 2019 to determine the types of cancers tested, number with a possible germline mutation and number referred for genetic counseling and testing (GCT). Results: 4,825 PTS with advanced cancer underwent STRATA NGS testing. A total of 207 PTS (4.3%) were identified as potential germline mutation carriers, all 207 were recommended for GCT referral. Of these, 92 (45.0%) separately met 2020 NCCN Criteria for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment (2020NG/FA), prior to tumor NGS; 115 (53.6%) did not and 3 (1.4%) had insufficient information. The cancers most frequently meeting NCCN criteria were pancreatic, breast and colon. Of the 92 PTS who met 2020NG/FA, 60 (65%) underwent GCT and 34 (57%) were confirmed to have a germline mutation. Of the 115 PTS that did not meet 2020NG/FA, 47 (41%) underwent GCT and 19 (40%) were confirmed to have a germline mutation. Overall germline mutations were confirmed in 16.5% of patients who did not meet 2020NG/FA and 37% who did. Conclusions: In our community-based integrated healthcare system, systematic review of next-generation sequencing results by an expert GOC led to more robust identification of germline mutation carriers and navigated them to appropriate GCT. Ongoing work will clarify data on cascade testing. We are currently developing automated workflows for GCT.

Rituximab monotherapy has proven efficacy in treatment-naive, asymptomatic advanced-stage follicular lymphoma (FL). Ofatumumab is a fully humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with increased CD20 affinity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. This phase 2 trial (NCT01190449) evaluated ofatumumab in patients with untreated, low/intermediate-risk FL International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), advanced-stage FL to determine single-agent efficacy. Patients with measurable disease in stages III/IV or bulky stage II, regardless of Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires criteria, received 4 weekly 1000 mg doses followed by four extended induction doses once every 8 weeks. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) to 1000 mg; secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Fifty-one patients were enrolled. Fifteen patients were randomized to 500 mg prior to discontinuing that arm for slow accrual. Among 36 patients on the 1000 mg arm, ORR was 84%, median PFS was 1·9 years and median response duration was 23·7 months. All patients remain alive. No grade 4 infusion reactions or grade 3/4 infections occurred. Grade 3 infusion reactions occurred in 25% in the 1000 mg arm only (all first infusion); all but two patients continued on study. Discontinuation was 6% for the total study population. Ofatumumab monotherapy administered by extended induction in untreated, low/intermediate-risk FLIPI, advanced-stage FL is well tolerated and active. Activity appears similar to that reported with single-agent rituximab.

Introduction Despite the advances in radiation techniques and chemotherapy, survival with current platinum-based chemotherapy and concomitant thoracic radiation remains dismal. Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, modulates apoptosis and cell cycle through disruption of protein degradation. The combination of bortezomib and carboplatin/paclitaxel and concurrent radiation in unresectable stage III non–small-cell lung cancer was evaluated in this phase I/II study. Methods Patients with histologic or cytologic confirmed stage III nonmetastatic non–small-cell lung cancer who were candidates for radiation therapy were eligible. In the phase I portion, patients received escalating doses of bortezomib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin concomitantly with thoracic radiation (60 Gy/30 daily fractions) using a modified 3 + 3 design. The primary endpoint for the phase II portion was the 12-month survival rate (12MS). A one-stage design with an interim analysis yielded 81% power to detect a true 12MS of 75%, with a 0.09 level of significance if the true 12MS was 60% using a sample size of 60 patients. Secondary endpoints consisted of adverse events (AEs), overall survival, progression-free survival, and the confirmed response rate. Results Thirty-one patients enrolled during the phase I portion of the trial, of which four cancelled before receiving treatment, leaving 27 evaluable patients. Of these 27 patients, two dose-limiting toxicities were observed, one (grade 3 pneumonitis) at dose level 1 (bortezomib at 0.5 mg/m 2 , paclitaxel at 150 mg/m 2 , and carboplatin at area under the curve of 5) and one (grade 4 neutropenia lasting ≥8 days) at dose level 6 (bortezomib 1.2 mg/m 2 , paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 , and carboplatin at area under the curve of 6). During the phase I portion, the most common grade 3 of 4 AEs were leukopenia (44%), neutropenia (37%), dyspnea (22%), and dysphagia (11%). Dose level 6 was declared to be the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and the phase II portion of the study opened. After the first 26 evaluable patients were enrolled to the RP2D, a per protocol interim analysis occurred. Of these 26 patients, 23 (88%) survived at least 6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 70–98%), which was enough to continue to full accrual per study design. However, due to slow accrual, the study was stopped after 27 evaluable patients were enrolled (6—phase I RP2D; 21—phase II). Of these 27 patients, the 12MS was 73% (95% CI, 58–92%), the median overall survival was 25.0 months (95% CI, 15.6–35.8), and the median progression-free survival was 8.4 months (95% CI, 4.1–10.5). The confirmed response rate was 26% (seven of 27; 95% CI, 11–46%), consisting of four partial responses and three complete responses. Grade 3+ and grade 4+ AEs occurred in 82% and 56% of patients, respectively. One patient experienced grade 5 pneumonitis that was possibly related to the treatment. Grade 3 and 4 hematological toxicities were observed in 82% and 56% patients, respectively. Conclusions The addition of bortezomib to concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel and radiation seemed to be feasible, although associated with increased hematological toxicities. A favorable median overall survival of 25 months suggests a potential benefit for this regimen.

Purpose Tumor overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) has been associated with worse outcome in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 30203, we found that the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib in addition to chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC improved progression-free and overall survival in patients with moderate to high COX-2 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). CALGB 30801 (Alliance) was designed to prospectively confirm that finding. Patients and Methods Patients with NSCLC (stage IIIB with pleural effusion or stage IV according to American Joint Committee on Cancer [sixth edition] criteria) were preregistered, and biopsy specimens were analyzed for COX-2 by IHC. Patients with COX-2 expression ≥ 2, performance status of 0 to 2, and normal organ function were eligible. Chemotherapy was determined by histology: carboplatin plus pemetrexed for nonsquamous NSCLC and carboplatin plus gemcitabine for squamous histology. Patients were randomly assigned to celecoxib (400 mg twice per day; arm A) or placebo (arm B). The primary objective was to demonstrate improvement in progression-free survival in patients with COX-2 index ≥ 4 with hazard ratio of 0.645 with approximately 85% power at two-sided significance level of .05. Results The study was halted for futility after 312 of the planned 322 patients with COX-2 index ≥ 2 were randomly assigned. There were no significant differences between the groups (hazard ratio, 1.046 for COX-2 ≥ 4). Subset analyses evaluating histology, chemotherapy regimen, and incremental COX-2 expression did not demonstrate any advantage for COX-2 inhibition. Elevation of baseline urinary metabolite of prostaglandin E2, indicating activation of the COX-2 pathway, was a negative prognostic factor. Values above the third quartile may have been a predictive factor. Conclusion COX-2 expression by IHC failed to select patients who could benefit from selective COX-2 inhibition. Urinary metabolite of prostaglandin E2 may be able to identify patients who could benefit from COX-2 inhibition.

Background We hypothesized that the combination of bevacizumab, carboplatin, and pemetrexed will be an effective first-line regimen in fit, elderly patients with nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer. Methods Treatment-naive, stage IIIB/IV nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer patients more than 70 years old with good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1) and adequate organ function were eligible. Carboplatin area under the curve 6, pemetrexed 500 mg/m 2 , and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg were administered on day 1 of each 21-day cycle (up to six cycles) followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab. The primary end point of 6-month progression-free survival rate of at least 70% was assessed using a one-stage binomial design. Quality of life (QOL) questionnaires were administered. Polymorphisms in genes encoding relevant proteins (drug targets, transport, and metabolism proteins) were correlated with treatment outcome. Results Fifty-seven eligible patients were enrolled. Median age was 74.5 years. Median treatment cycles received was 6. The most common grade 3 or higher non-hematologic adverse events were fatigue (26%) and hypertension (11%); 16% had grade 4 neutropenia and 6.5% had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Three patients experienced grade 3/4 hemorrhagic events (one pulmonary, two gastrointestinal). Primary end point of PFS6 was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45.9–73%). Median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.9–10.1), median overall survival was 13.7 months (95% CI: 9.4–16.8). Polymorphic KDR and VEGFA variants correlated with survival and toxicity, respectively. There was no significant change in overall QOL scores over time. Conclusion This regimen is feasible and did not decrease the QOL in this study population. However, it did not meet the primary efficacy end point.

Because the extant literature suggests wine increases appetite, this study sought to determine whether this effect could be observed in advanced cancer patients with appetite loss. Advanced cancer patients with self-reported loss of appetite were randomly assigned to white wine with ≤15 % alcohol content twice a day for 3–4 weeks versus a nutritional supplement, such as Boost® or Ensure®. Patients assigned to wine were encouraged to also take a nutritional supplement, whereas patients assigned to the nutritional supplement arm were told to abstain completely from alcohol. Patient-reported outcomes were captured with a validated questionnaire to assess the primary endpoint of appetite improvement. A total of 141 patients (118 evaluable) were enrolled. Twenty-eight patients (48 %) in the wine arm reported an improvement in appetite at some point during the treatment period, whereas 22 patients (37 %) assigned to the nutritional supplement arm also reported improvement (p = 0.35). Other appetite-related questions and questionnaire items showed no statistically significant differences between treatment arms. In both arms, approximately 9 % of patients achieved weight stability (p = 0.98); median survival was not statistically different. Both interventions were well tolerated. As prescribed in this trial, wine does not improve appetite or weight in advanced cancer patients.

Introduction Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an aggressive disease with limited therapeutic options. In preclinical models, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) stimulates MM proliferation. In MM patients, higher plasma VEGF levels correlate inversely with survival. Cediranib is an orally administered tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGF receptors-1, -2, and -3. Methods We conducted a multi-center phase II trial of cediranib in patients with unresectable, histologically-confirmed MM who had received ≤1 prior regimen of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Initial cediranib dosing was 45 mg daily during a 28-day cycle. Due to substantial toxicity, the starting dose was subsequently lowered to 30 mg daily. Results Fifty-one patients enrolled at 9 centers; 50 were evaluable for response. Partial responses were observed in 10% of patients; stable disease was seen in 34%. Disease control (PR + SD) was higher at the 45 mg cediranib dose level (67% vs. 34%, p = 0.04). Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% CI 0.1, 14.2); median overall survival (OS) was 4.4 months (95% CI 0.9, 41.7). The 1-year survival rate was 15%. Grade 3/4 toxicities were more frequent in the 45 mg dose level group (87% vs. 43%, p = 0.002). These included fatigue, hypertension, pulmonary embolism, angioedema, and reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy. Median OS was superior in patients who developed ≥grade 3 hypertension (8.5 vs. 4.1 months, p = 0.024). Conclusion This trial did not meet its pre-specified response endpoint. A higher cediranib dose level was associated with improved disease control, but this dose was poorly tolerated.

Purpose Vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, exerts anticancer effects by both histone and nonhistone–mediated mechanisms. It also enhances the anticancer effects of platinum compounds and taxanes in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines. This phase II randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy of vorinostat in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC. Patients and Methods Patients with previously untreated stage IIIB (ie, wet) or IV NSCLC were randomly assigned (2:1) to carboplatin (area under the curve, 6 mg/mL × min) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m2 day 3) with either vorinostat (400 mg by mouth daily) or placebo. Vorinostat or placebo was given on days 1 through 14 of each 3-week cycle to a maximum of six cycles. The primary end point was comparison of the response rate. Results Ninety-four patients initiated protocol therapy. Baseline patient characteristics were similar between the two arms. The median number of cycles was four for both treatment arms. The confirmed response rate was 34% with vorinostat versus 12.5% with placebo (P = .02). There was a trend toward improvement in median progression-free survival (6.0 months v 4.1 months; P = .48) and overall survival (13.0 months v 9.7 months; P = .17) in the vorinostat arm. Grade 4 platelet toxicity was more common with vorinostat (18% v 3%; P < .05). Nausea, emesis, fatigue, dehydration, and hyponatremia also were more frequent with vorinostat. Conclusion Vorinostat enhances the efficacy of carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC. HDAC inhibition is a promising therapeutic strategy for treatment of NSCLC.

Background: This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and preliminary efficacy of docetaxel with concurrent radiotherapy (RT), in high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had resected squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, histologically involved lymph nodes, and/or extranodal disease, and/or involved surgical margins and performance status 0 to 1. Treatment included weekly docetaxel with concurrent RT in a dose-finding study; a subsequent small cohort of patients was treated using the MTD of docetaxel. Results: Twenty patients were enrolled. Planned accrual was 25, but the study was closed prematurely because of slow accrual. The MTD was 15 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity was oral stomatitis. Therapy was well tolerated. Five patients experienced locoregional relapse at a median follow-up of 32 months. Conclusion: Docetaxel with concurrent RT has acceptable toxicity. This approach warrants further investigation in a phase II trial.

Purpose This study was undertaken to explore the response rate of a first-line, three-drug regimen that consisted of bortezomib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, or gastric cardia. Patients and Methods Patients with the above diagnosis and acceptable organ function were treated intravenously on a 21-day cycle with the following: bortezomib 1.2 mg/m 2 on days 1, 4, and 8; paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 on day 2; and carboplatin with an area under the curve of 6 on day 2. Patients received indefinite treatment unless they manifested tumor progression or severe adverse events. All were monitored for tumor response as well as other clinical outcomes. Results The cohort included 35 eligible patients with a median age of 59 years (range, 36–78) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0, 1, and 2 in 60%, 34%, and 6% of patients, respectively. Although this regimen was well tolerated, the tumor response rate was lower than that anticipated at 23% (95% confidence interval: 10%, 40%), thereby prompting premature study closure. There were no complete responses. The median survival for the cohort was 8.9 months (95% confidence interval: 5.9, 12.8). Conclusion As prescribed in this trial and for this indication, this regimen does not merit further testing.

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of maintenance sunitinib after chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients and Methods The Cancer and Leukemia Group B 30504 trial was a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II study that enrolled patients before chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m2 or carboplatin area under the curve of 5 on day 1 plus etoposide 100 mg/m2 per day on days 1 to 3 every 21 days for four to six cycles). Patients without progression were randomly assigned 1:1 to placebo or sunitinib 37.5 mg per day until progression. Cross-over after progression was allowed. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) from random assignment for maintenance placebo versus sunitinib using a one-sided log-rank test with α = .15; 80 randomly assigned patients provided 89% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.67. Results One hundred forty-four patients were enrolled; 138 patients received chemotherapy. Ninety-five patients were randomly assigned; 10 patients did not receive maintenance therapy (five on each arm). Eighty-five patients received maintenance therapy (placebo, n = 41; sunitinib, n = 44). Grade 3 adverse events with more than 5% incidence were fatigue (19%), decreased neutrophils (14%), decreased leukocytes (7%), and decreased platelets (7%) for sunitinib and fatigue (10%) for placebo; grade 4 adverse events were GI hemorrhage (n = 1) and pancreatitis, hypocalcemia, and elevated lipase (n = 1; all in same patient) for sunitinib and thrombocytopenia (n = 1) and hypernatremia (n = 1) for placebo. Median PFS on maintenance was 2.1 months for placebo and 3.7 months for sunitinib (HR, 1.62; 70% CI, 1.27 to 2.08; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.60; one-sided P = .02). Median overall survival from random assignment was 6.9 months for placebo and 9.0 months for sunitinib (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.79 to 2.10; one-sided P = .16). Three sunitinib and no placebo patients achieved complete response during maintenance. Ten (77%) of 13 patients evaluable after cross-over had stable disease on sunitinib (6 to 27 weeks). Conclusion Maintenance sunitinib was safe and improved PFS in extensive-stage SCLC.

Purpose: The clinical relevance of targeting the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, activated in 70% to 80% of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), is unknown. Experimental Design: Selumetinib is an oral small-molecule inhibitor of MAP–ERK kinase (MEK)-1/2. Forty-seven patients with relapsed/refractory AML or 60 years old or more with untreated AML were enrolled on a phase II study. Patients were stratified by FLT3 ITD mutation status. The primary endpoint was response rate (complete, partial, and minor). Leukemia cells were analyzed for extracellular signal—regulated kinase (ERK) and mTOR phosphorylation. Results: Common drug-related toxicities were grade 1–2 diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and skin rash. In the FLT3 wild-type cohort, six of 36 (17%) patients had a response [one partial response, three minor responses, two unconfirmed minor responses (uMR)]. No patient with FLT3 ITD responded. NRAS and KRAS mutations were detected in 7% and 2% of patients, respectively. The sole patient with KRAS mutation had uMR with hematologic improvement in platelets. Baseline p-ERK activation was observed in 85% of patients analyzed but did not correlate with a response. A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs3733542 in exon 18 of the KIT gene was detected in significantly higher number of patients with response/stable disease compared with nonresponders (60% vs. 23%; P = 0.027). Conclusions: Selumetinib is associated with modest single-agent antileukemic activity in advanced AML. However, given its favorable toxicity profile, combination with drugs that target other signaling pathways in AML should be considered. The potential association of SNP rs3733542 in exon 18 of the KIT gene with antileukemic activity of selumetinib is intriguing, but will require validation in larger trials. Clin Cancer Res; 20(2); 490–8. ©2013 AACR.

Background: mTOR inhibitors, including temsirolimus (TEM), have demonstrated activity in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (rel/ref) lymphomas (J Clin Oncol 2010;28(31):4740). Lenalidomide (LEN) is an immunomodulatory agent with activity in a number of lymphoma subtypes with potential additive or synergistic effects. We previously reported phase I results of TEM/LEN in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphomas and showed good tolerability and evidence of clinical activity (J Clin Oncol 2012;30 suppl; abstract 8075). Recommended phase II doses of TEM 25 mg weekly and LEN 20 mg daily (D1-21, q28D) were tested in 3 histology-based cohorts with final results presented here. Methods: Pts with rel/ref lymphomas having received > 1 cytotoxic regimen were eligible. Other criteria included ANC > 1000/uL, platelets > 75,000/uL, and normal renal and hepatic function. Pts were enrolled into 3 cohorts: DLBCL (cohort A), FL (cohort B), and other lymphomas (cohort C). CLL/SLL was excluded due to poor single-agent TEM activity. TEM was administered at 25 mg IV weekly, and LEN at 20 mg PO daily (D1-21, q28D). Pts received therapy for up to 1 year, or until disease progression or development of toxicities requiring treatment cessation. All pts received ASA prophylaxis. Response assessments were performed after cycle 2, and every 3 months thereafter. Results: 93 pts (31 female, 62 male), mean age 57 years (range, 23-78 years) were enrolled onto cohort A (n=39 DLBCL), cohort B (n=15 FL), or cohort C (n=39; 20 HL, 9 T-NHL, 5 MCL, 4 MZL, 1 WM). The median number of prior treatments was 4 (range, 1-14). 28 pts had relapsed following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The median number of cycles delivered was 4 (range, 1-12). Grade 3 or higher non-hematologic adverse events (AE) were uncommon with only fatigue and hypokalemia occurring in >10% of pts; ≥ grade 3 hematologic toxicity included anemia (n=27), lymphopenia (n=40), neutropenia (n=44) and thrombocytopenia (n=42). Three grade 5 AEs were observed (colonic perforation, myocardial infarction and sepsis). The overall response rates (ORR) were 25.6% (5 CR; 5 PR), 46.6% (5 CR; 2 PR), and 64.1% (7 CR; 18 PR) for pts in cohorts A, B, and C, respectively. Of note, cohort B (FL) was closed prematurely due to poor accrual. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for pts in cohorts A and C was 6.0 months (95% CI 3.1 - 8.0 months), and 7.3 months (4.2 - 10.8 months), and median duration of response (DOR) was 11.3 months (2.6 months - not reached) and 5.5 months (2.3 months - not reached), respectively. Median overall survival (OS) for pts in cohorts A and C was 10.2 months (5.9 - 20.6 months), 25.5 months (10.1 - not reached), respectively. Among 20 heavily-treated HL pts in cohort C (median prior treatments 6, range 3-14), all of whom progressed on brentuximab vedotin (BV), and 13 of whom had received a prior ASCT, the ORR was 80% (7 CR; 9 PR), and the median PFS, DOR and OS was 9.2 months, 8.1 months, and 25.5 months, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of TEM/LEN therapy was well-tolerated and showed encouraging activity in pts with rel/ref lymphomas. The most significant activity was observed in rel/ref HL, with an 80% response rate, including in pts with prior BV exposure and in those relapsed after ASCT. For DLBCL, the addition of LEN did not improve ORR compared to historical experience with single-agent TEM, but we note a provocative prolongation of both PFS and DOR for this otherwise aggressive disease. Further evaluation of mTOR pathway inhibition and immunomodulatory agents in relapsed HL patients is warranted based on these results. This study was conducted through the University of Chicago Phase II Consortium, supported by NCI contract N01-CM-2011-00071C Disclosures Kline: Vasculox: Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding. Petrich:AbbVie: Employment. Rao:Novocure: Consultancy. Smith:TGTX: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: Educational lecture to sales force; Genentech: Consultancy, Other: on a DSMB for two trials ; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy.

205 Background: Metastatic lesions with unknown or differential diagnoses pose significant challenges leading to suboptimal treatment and outcomes. Molecular diagnosis with the 92-GA has shown improved accuracy compared to IHC and improved survival in pts treated based on assay results. The following prospective, multi-institutional study assessed the utility and impact of the 92-GA in diagnosis and treatment decision-making in community clinical practice. Methods: Over 18 months, physicians (68 medical oncologists, 25 pathologists) completed standardized, discipline-specific questionnaires via a web-based data portal for 444 cases in which the 92-GA was ordered as part of routine clinical care for pts with unknown or differential diagnoses. Physician-reported utility and impact were characterized for oncologists and pathologists. Results: 92-GA molecular diagnoses included 22 different tumor types: pancreaticobiliary (21%), lung squamous (9%), lung adenocarcinoma (9%), and intestinal (9%) were most common. Factors contributing to ordering the 92-GA were interdisciplinary: for oncologists, no primary following clinical review and imaging (42%), pathology report of a differential diagnosis (21%) or unknown primary (20%), and differentiation between a new cancer or recurrence (16%) were most common; for pathologists, IHC inconclusive (50%; median 9 IHC stains) and oncology ordered due to unknown primary (30%) were most common. Oncologists reported that the diagnosis provided by the 92-GA resulted in changing the treatment option in 46% of cases. 75% of pts received therapy with a median time from biopsy to treatment of 25d. Following the 92-GA, predictive biomarkers (eg, EGFR, ALK) were ordered in 81% of cases diagnosed as lung and 67% diagnosed as colorectal cancer. Conclusions: This study demonstrated significant clinical utility of the 92-GA: changing treatment options in approximately half of pts. Clinical utility spanned a spectrum of diagnostic uncertainty for oncologists and pathologists, and helped narrow differential diagnosis. Additional biomarker testing was common after a diagnosis of lung or colorectal cancer was rendered by the 92-GA.

Purpose Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting toxicity of capecitabine for which no effective preventative treatment has been definitively demonstrated. This trial was conducted on the basis of preliminary data that a urea/lactic acid–based topical keratolytic agent (ULABTKA) may prevent HFS. Patients and Methods A randomized, double-blind phase III trial evaluated 137 patients receiving their first ever cycle of capecitabine at a dose of either 2,000 or 2,500 mg/m2 per day for 14 days. Patients were randomly assigned to a ULABTKA versus a placebo cream, which was applied to the hands and feet twice per day for 21 days after the start of capecitabine. Patients completed an HFS diary (HFSD) daily. HFS toxicity grade (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] v3.0) was also collected at baseline and at the end of each cycle. The primary end point was the incidence of moderate/severe HFS symptoms in the first treatment cycle, based on the patient-reported HFSD. Results The percentage of patients with moderate/severe HFS symptoms was not different between groups, being 13.6% in the ULABTKA arm and 10.2% in the placebo arm (P = .768 by Fisher's exact test). The odds ratio was 1.37 (95% CI, 0.37 to 5.76). Cycle 1 CTCAE skin toxicity was higher in the ULABTKA arm but not significantly so (33% v 27%; P = .82). No significant differences were observed in other toxicities between groups. Conclusion These data do not support the efficacy of a ULABTKA cream for preventing HFS symptoms in patients receiving capecitabine.

Background: The objective of ECOG 1503 was to determine the response rate of this combination in the second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Methods: Triapine 105 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, and 15, and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15, of a 28 day cycle. Results: Eighteen patients enrolled. Three patients were not eligible due to protocol violations. No objective antitumor responses were seen. Three patients (20%) experienced stable disease (90% CI 5.7–44%). Median overall survival: 5.4 months (95% CI 4.2–11.6 months); median time to progression: 1.8 months (95% CI 1.7–3.5 months). Five patients developed acute infusion reactions to Triapine® related to elevated methemoglobinemia. Patients with MDR1 variant genotypes of C3435T experienced superior overall survival compared to non-variants (13.3 vs. 4.3 months, respectively, p = 0.023). Conclusion: This regimen did not demonstrate activity in relapsed NSCLC. Prolonged survival seen with MDR1 variant genotypes is hypothesis-generating.

Background Advanced renal cell cancer (RCC) continues to have a poor overall prognosis despite new FDA-approved therapies. Although taxane-based therapies are generally ineffective in RCC, research into the role of the von Hippel–Lindau protein has shown an association with microtubule dynamics. Mitotic kinesins are a class of molecular motors that also interact with microtubules and are required for proper mitotic function. SB-715992 is a new agent that inhibits the function of a mitotic kinesin known as kinesin spindle protein and leads to cell death. Patients and Methods Twenty patients with previously treated advanced RCC were enrolled on this phase II trial of SB-715992, with response rate as a primary endpoint. Results No patients responded with complete or partial remission. Six patients had stable disease, and 1 patient continues on therapy after 12 cycles. Common toxicities included anemia (80%), elevated creatinine (70%), lymphopenia (45%), fatigue (50%), hyperglycemia (50%), and dyspnea (45%). Reported grade 3/4 toxicities included dyspnea, fatigue, neutropenia with skin infection, dizziness, hyperuricemia, and hypertension. Conclusion This dose and schedule of SB-715992 does not appear to have a significant cytotoxic effect for patients with previously treated advanced RCC.

249 Background: Metastatic lesions with unknown (CUP), unclear, or differential diagnoses pose significant challenges, particularly when presenting in the GI tract, leading to suboptimal treatment and outcomes. In clinical studies, molecular classification with the 92-gene assay demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy compared to standard pathology techniques and improved survival in patients treated based on assay results. The current study assessed the utility of the 92-gene assay in diagnoses and treatment decision-making in clinical practice. Methods: Cases in which the 92-gene assay was ordered as part of routine clinical care were submitted into a study database via web-based, standardized, discipline-specific questionnaires. Utilization and impact of the assay were characterized for medical oncologists and pathologists. Physician-reported results from medical oncologists are included in this interim analysis of 134 cases. Results: Results from this registry-based reporting study showed that molecular profiling impacted treatment decisions in 53% of cases. Significantly, 46% of these cases reported a change in treatment regimen associated with integration of 92-gene assay results. Clinical scope included 18 tumor types with 52% having a molecular diagnosis of GI origin. The top 3 diagnoses were pancreaticobiliary, intestine, and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. The pre-assay working diagnosis was unknown in 41%, a differential diagnosis in 26%, and a single suspected site in 33% of cases. Conclusions: Findings from this study demonstrate that use of the 92-gene assay impacted treatment decisions and selection in a significant proportion of patients, and further define its role in clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment planning of diagnostically-challenging metastatic cancer. [Table: see text]

Background: Increased rates of SPM have been observed as newer cancer treatments have improved survival over the past 2 decades (Fraumeni et al. NCI, 2006). Higher incidence of specific types of hematologic SPM following MM, especially acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes, have been reported relative to the general population (Dores et al. NCI, 2006; Mailankody et al. Blood, 2011; Ravazi et al. Blood, 2011; Landgren and Mailankody. Leukemia, 2014). A complex interplay between myeloma-, host-, environmental-, and treatment-related factors likely contributes to the increased incidence of SPM in MM. Connect MM is the first and largest prospective, observational, US-based, multicenter registry designed to characterize patients (pts), treatment patterns, and outcomes in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) pts. Methods: Between September 2009 and November 2012,a total of 1493 NDMM pts were enrolled from 234 US sites within 2 mos of the first diagnosis of MM. Patient data were collected at baseline and each subsequent quarter using a standardized form. Invasive SPM included hematologic and solid tumor second cancers and non-invasive SPM were defined as non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). SPM incidence and incidence rate (IR; number of pts with SPM per 100 patient-yrs [PY]) were calculated for all pts and by exposure to specific treatments, including lenalidomide (LEN). PYs were calculated as the observation period from the start of treatment until the detection of the first reported SPM (per category), death, or end of follow-up (pt lost or data cutoff). Results: As of Dec 10, 2013, SPM data were available for 1493 NDMM pts. The median age was 67 yrs (range, 24-94 yrs), 82% of patients were white and 57% were male. Median follow-up was 29.0 mos (0-49 mos). The median OS of treated pts was 44.4 mos. Fifty pts did not receive treatment and had no SPM reported. A total of 74 of the 1443 treated pts (5.1%) reported SPM. Invasive SPM were observed in 51 pts (3.5%): 37 pts (2.6%) with solid tumors and 14 pts (1.0%) with hematologic SPM. Lung/bronchus and myelodysplastic syndromes were the most frequently reported solid tumor and hematologic SPM respectively. NMSC were reported for 26 pts (1.8%). 3 pts had both an invasive SPM and NMSC. The IRs for invasive, hematologic, and solid tumor SPM by LEN exposure are listed in Table 1. By multivariate analysis, the only significant risk factor for the occurrence of SPM was prior history of invasive malignancy. Demographics (including age, ethnicity, race, and gender), International Staging System stage, family history of myeloma or other cancers, history of smoldering MM or monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance, or prior radiation therapy were not associated with the occurrence of SPM. Conclusions: This analysis shows that there was no increased risk of invasive SPM in this disease-specific registry of pts with NDMM. The risk of SPM for LEN exposed pts was not greater than that for pts not exposed to LEN. In addition, multivariate analysis indicated the only significant risk factor for SPM was prior history of invasive malignancy. As additional agents are approved for the treatment of MM and the length of pt survival increases, longer prospective observation with expanded enrollment on the registry will better characterize the occurrence of SPM in this pt population. Correlations with risk factors including age, pre-existing MDS, risk status, as well as type and duration of therapy will continue to be investigated. Table 1. Incidence rates (per 100 PYa) by treatment exposure IR per 100 PY (95% CI) SPM LEN-Exposed (n = 977) Non–LEN Exposed (n = 466) Invasive 0.85 (0.61-1.19) 1.16 (0.72-1.86) Hematologic 0.17 (0.08-0.36) 0.47 (0.22-0.99) Solid tumor 0.67 (0.46-0.98) 0.68 (0.36-1.26) NMSC 0.50 (0.32-0.77) 0.41 (0.18-0.91) a PY of exposure is the sum of exposure of all pts. Disclosures Rifkin: Celgene Corp: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Abonour:Celgene Corp: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Shah:Celgene Corp: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mehta:Celgene Corp: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Narang:Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Terebelo:Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gasparetto:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Honoraria. Thomas:Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Toomey:Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hardin:Celgene Corp: Research Funding. Lu:Celgene Corp: Employment. Kenvin:Celgene Corp: Employment. Srinivasan:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ricafort:Celgene Corp: Employment. Nagarwala:Celgene Corp: Employment. Durie:Celgene Corp: Expert Board Committee Other; IRC Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; DMC Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; IRC J&J: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background: MM treatment (Tx) advances have greatly improved clinical outcomes for patients (pts). A recent study demonstrated improved survival in MM through the past decade attributable to the impact of initial therapy with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and thalidomide. The greatest impact was observed in older pts (Kumar, et al. Leukemia, 2014). Connect MM, the first and largest prospective, observational, US-based, multicenter registry was designed to characterize pts, Tx patterns, and outcomes in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). Methods: This ongoing registry was initiated in September 2009. Eligible pts with NDMM (diagnosis must have occurred within 2 mos of study entry) were enrolled at 234 US sites. Data were collected at baseline and each subsequent quarter using an electronic case report form. The initial enrollment includes all pts who had provided informed consent as of November 1, 2012 (N = 1493). The data cutoff for this analysis was Dec 10, 2013. A total of 1444 pts were treated and were included in overall survival (OS) analyses. Survival was examined for all treated pts adjusting for pt and Tx characteristics including age, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) status, gender, race, disease risk factors (International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG] high risk vs. non-high risk), and therapy received (triplet vs. non-triplet) among others. Triplet therapy was defined as any combination of 3 or more drugs during the first Tx regimen. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and comparisons across groups were assessed used the log-rank test. Results: At the time of data cutoff, 1493 pts were enrolled with 1444 having received Tx. Of the treated pts 253 pts (18%) had IMWG high-risk disease and 108 pts (7%) had del(17p) at baseline. Median age was 67 y (range, 24-94 y), 57.2% were male, and 81.9% were white. Median follow-up was 29 mos (0-49.4 mos). The median OS for all treated pts was 44.4 mos. When assessed by age group, OS was significantly different (log-rank P < .0001) with a median of 47.6 mos for pts aged < 65 y (n = 632), 45.0 mos for those aged 65 to < 75 y (n = 443), and 33.7 mos for those aged ≥ 75 y (n = 369). OS was significantly longer for pts with ASCT vs. no ASCT (P < .0001), but not different by gender (P = .962) or race (Caucasian vs. African American vs. other; P = .250). Three-year OS probabilities by subgroup are listed in Table 1. When considering risk factors, IMWG risk was borderline significant (high vs. non-high; P = .106), and presence of del(17p) by cytogenetics and FISH was associated with significantly shortened OS (P = .005; Figure 1A). Interestingly, use of triplet therapy vs. non-triplet therapy was associated with significantly prolonged OS regardless of IMWG risk (non-high: P < .0001; high: P = .003; Figure 1B). However, no improvement was noted for triplet vs. non-triplet therapy in pts with del(17p). By multivariate analysis, the significant (P < .05) factors impacting OS were age (in 10-yr increments), International Staging System (ISS) disease stage, ECOG performance status, history of diabetes, anemia, renal function, and platelet count. Conclusions: This interim analysis based on initially treated pts demonstrated that age, ISS stage, and co-morbidities impact OS irrespective of IMWG cytogenetic risk. Triplet Tx was associated with significantly longer OS in pts regardless of IMWG risk status. This is the largest prospective pt cohort with high-risk disease including del(17p). Pts with high-risk disease did not have significantly lower OS vs. pts without high-risk features. Pts with del(17p) (p53 deletion) continue to have shorter OS approaching 3 y and increased survival with use of triplet therapy. Table 1. Kaplan-Meier Estimated 3-Y OS Probability Patients 3-y OS Probability (%) (95% CI) All (N = 1444) 62.6 (59.5-65.8) < 65 y (n = 632) 69.8 (65.2-74.3) 65 to < 75 y (n = 443) 65.0 (59.4-70.6) ≥ 75 y (n = 369) 47.2 (40.7-53.8) Gender Male (n = 831) 62.1 (57.9-66.3) Female (n = 613) 63.4 (58.7-68.2) Race Caucasian (n = 1191) 61.8 (58.3-65.3) African American (n = 183) 64.4 (55.4-73.5) Other (n = 27) 77.6 (57.3-98.0) ASCT Yes (n = 494) 77.1 (72.5-81.7) No (n = 950) 54.2 (50.0-58.3) Triplet therapy Yes (n = 778) 69.3 (65.3-73.3) No (n = 666) 54.8 (49.9-59.6) IMWG risk High (n = 253) 59.0 (51.6-66.4) Standard (n = 566) 66.3 (61.4-71.2) Low (n = 86) 75.7 (63.6-87.8) del(17p) Present (n = 108) 52.7 (41.8-63.6) Absent (n = 1336) 63.4 (60.1-66.7) Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Shah: Celgene Corp: Consultancy, Research Funding. Abonour:Celgene Corp: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Durie:Celgene Corp: Export Board Committee Other, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; IRC Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; DMC Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; IRC J&J: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mehta:Celgene Corp: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Narang:Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Terebelo:Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gasparetto:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Honoraria. Thomas:Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Toomey:Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hardin:Celgene Corp: Research Funding. Srinivasan:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ricafort:Celgene Corp: Employment. Nagarwala:Celgene Corp: Employment. Rifkin:Celgene Corp: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy.

BACKGROUND Intergroup Trial N9741 evaluated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) administered in conjunction with either irinotecan or oxaliplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The current report describes two treatment arms that were withdrawn from the protocol due to unexpected treatment-related toxicities and a high mortality rate. The complications observed in these arms highlight the importance of aggressive and immediate supportive care in the management of digestive toxicity. METHODS In Trial N9741, patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following six regimens: 1) irinotecan plus bolus 5-FU/LV (Arm A); 2) sequential irinotecan plus bolus 5-FU/LV (Arm B); 3) bolus 5-FU/LV only (Mayo Clinic regimen; Arm D); 4) oxaliplatin plus bolus 5-FU/LV (Arm E); 5) oxaliplatin plus infusional 5-FU/LV (Arm F); or 6) oxaliplatin plus irinotecan (Arm G). In the current study, the authors investigated treatment-related toxicity in patients who received either of the two combination regimens containing daily bolus 5-FU (i.e., patients in Arm B or Arm E). RESULTS Sixty-one and 47 patients were enrolled in Arm B and Arm E, respectively. Diarrhea and neutropenia were the most common toxicities in both groups. Five patients in Arm B (8.2%) and 4 patients in Arm E (8.5%) died within 60 days of study entry. All fatal toxicities occurred within 15 days of treatment administration, and all deaths were associated with the simultaneous occurrence of multiple symptoms, which were dominated by Grade ≥ 3 diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS Combination regimens containing daily bolus 5-FU/LV and oxaliplatin or irinotecan can be associated with severe gastrointestinal toxicity and high mortality rates. Therefore, the authors recommend the use of more tolerable infusional 5-FU–based regimens in the treatment of metastatic CRC. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.

8567 Background: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients (pts) ineligible for or relapsed after transplant pose a considerable treatment (tx) challenge. While BV is an active agent in this setting, HL remai...

e19008 Background: Pazopanib is a novel, orally active, small molecule inhibitor targeting multiple tyrosine kinases and is indicated for the treatment of advanced renal cell cancer and advanced so...

Introduction The advent of new therapies for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has resulted in improved clinical outcomes and patient (pt) survival. However, the best combination of agents from different drug classes and subsequent therapeutic strategies for pts with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM), while investigated, has not yet been established. The goal of the Connect(R) MM registry is to provide insight into the disease and explore the management and outcomes of pts with NDMM who are treated at community and academic sites in the United States. This analysis aims to describe the combinations used in NDMM outside the interventional clinical trial setting and the activity and outcome response to different regimens by class of therapeutic agents in clinical practice. Methods Connect MM is an ongoing prospective, longitudinal, observational registry of NDMM pts. This multicenter US pt registry was initiated in 2009. Pts who were newly diagnosed with symptomatic MM within 2 months of enrollment were eligible to participate. Data were collected at baseline and every 3 months. Pts who had response data 12 months after enrollment, met CRAB criteria, and received treatment were eligible for this analysis. Treated pts were stratified according to SCT status. Data on baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, and initial therapies (proteasome inhibitors [PI], IMiD(R) immunomodulating agents, alkylating agents [AA], corticosteroids, and combinations) were collected. The overall response rate (ORR), as assessed by the site investigator, was defined as the best response during the course of initial therapy and is presented as cumulative ORR over 3, 6, and 12 months. Results As of the data cutoff (April 15, 2013), 1494 pts were enrolled in the registry; 1312 pts met CRAB criteria and received treatment. Of these, 439 received SCT or were anticipated to receive (had undergone a stem cell harvest) SCT and 873 would not receive SCT (non-SCT). Mean (SD) age for SCT and non-SCT pts was 58.9 years (8.7) and 69.8 years (10.7), respectively. Majority of pts in both groups were male (62.0% vs 56.5%) and Caucasian (85.4% vs 81.4%). Among SCT pts, ISS stages were: I/II (55.1%), III (25.3%), and unknown (19.6%) and ECOG performance status (PS) was 0/1 (63.1.%), 2/3 (7.1%), and unknown (29.8%). Among non-SCT pts, ISS stages were: I/II (42.0.%), III (32.2%), and unknown (25.8%) and ECOG PS was 0/1 (56.6%), 2/3/4 (14.7%), and unknown (28.8%). ORR to initial therapy and 1-year survival for the 5 most commonly used regimens are presented in the Table. A triplet regimen is 2 times more likely to be selected for SCT pts than for non-SCT pts, suggesting investigator bias in selecting more aggressive therapy for younger pts. For the 5 most commonly used regimens, 1-year survival was 97.9% for SCT pts and 83.3% for non-SCT pts. Conclusion Outside an interventional clinical trial setting, the most commonly used initial treatment regimens for NDMM were IMiD + PI + steroid for SCT pts and PI + steroid for non-SCT pts. Response rates were higher among SCT pts regardless of regimen. The investigator-assessed response rates were similar across the various combinations including 2 vs 3 drug combinations in SCT pts. Disclosures: Abonour: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: This abstract will report on an observational study. There is no pre-specified use of drugs; treating physicians determined what drugs to use and some could be off-label. Shah:Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Durie:Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Terebelo:Amgen: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria. Gasparetto:Celgene ( 2012): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium (2012): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mehta:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Narang:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Toomey:Celgene: Consultancy. Sullivan:Celgene: Employment. Srinivasan:Celgene: Employment. Nagarwala:Celgene: Employment. Rifkin:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria.

7506 Background: Sunitinib (S) inhibits small cell lung cancer (SCLC) targets VEGFR1-3, PDGFR, and KIT. We tested whether giving S after chemotherapy (C) for extensive stage SCLC improves progression free survival (PFS). Methods: CALGB 30504 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo (P) controlled phase II study for untreated SCLC, performance status 0-2, adequate organ function, and no S risk factors: bleeding, hypertension, or brain metastases. Enrollment was prior to C: cisplatin 80 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC5 day 1 plus etoposide 100 mg/m2days 1-3 every 21 days 4-6 cycles. Patients without progression after C were stratified cisplatin vs carboplatin, and 4-5 vs 6 cycles C, and randomized 1:1 to P or S 37.5 mg daily until progression assessed every 6 weeks. Prophylactic cranial irradiation was offered to responders (CR or PR) to start about 4-6 weeks after C. S was held during radiation. Crossover from P to S was allowed at progression. Primary endpoint was PFS (from time of randomization) for maintenance (M) P vs S using a 1-sided log rank test with a=0.15; 80 randomized and treated patients provide »89% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.67. Results: Between 5/09 and 12/11, 144 enrolled and 138 received C. Ninety five were randomized to P vs S; 10 did not receive M due to progression, refusal, and AE (5 each arm). Eighty five received M, 41 P and 44 S. Demographics were balanced. M toxicities grade > 3 and incidence > 5% included (%): grade 3 (S: fatigue 19, neutrophils 10, leukocytes 7, platelets 7) (P: fatigue 5); grade 4 (S: 1case GI hemorrhage, 1case lipase) P zero; grade 5 zero both arms. Efficacy (90% CI): PFS on maintenance after C was P 2.3 mo (CI: 1.7-2.6) and S 3.8 mo (2.7-4.4) (HR=1.54, CI 1.03-2.32, p=0.04). Overall survival (OS) was P 6.7 mo (5.5-9.5) and S 8.8 mo (8.0-9.8) (HR=1.10, CI 0.71-1.70, p=0.36). At progression on P, 17 received S and among 14 evaluable 10 (71%) had stable disease receiving 2-9 cycles S. Conclusions: The primary objective was met showing improved PFS for maintenance S. There was a non-significant trend toward improved OS despite crossover design. S was well tolerated. Further study of sunitinib after chemotherapy for SCLC is justified. Clinical trial information: NCT00453154.

e17590 Background: The discontinuation of chemotherapy within the last two weeks of life is a vital Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) assessment measure. In the last two weeks of life, continuation of chemotherapy may contribute to death rates as much as 20%. An aggressive approach to therapy may not be related to improved patient outcomes. We assess patterns in patient deaths and chemotherapy treatment at the end of life in the metastatic setting. Methods: Charts were collected and reviewed retrospectively between October 2009 and December 2012 from one, large QOPI certified, oncology/hematology group; that sees over 3500 new cancer patients per year at 14 locations along central Illinois. The receipt of chemotherapy within two weeks before patient expiration was identified from past billing charges. Results: A total of 5,560 patients died during the three year period. 154 (2.8%) patients received chemotherapy within two weeks of their expiration; median age was 67 years (range 42-89). By line of treatment, 48% of patients who received chemotherapy within the last two weeks of life were in their first line of therapy, with 44% of those patients having received only the first cycle. Only 14% of patients had received >3 lines of chemotherapy. By diagnosis, lung cancer had the highest number of patients treated in the last two weeks of life (29%). Conclusions: It is expected that deaths within two weeks of chemotherapy occur in heavily treated patients who are receiving multiple cycles of salvage chemotherapy regimens. At our center, we found that many of these patients died just after initiation of first line therapy. Moreover, patient death rates were observed to be much lower than what has been reported in other studies. This provides insight into the patterns of cancer care near the end of life. Better tools are needed to identify which patients are at higher risk of early death following initiation of chemotherapy when disease is diagnosed at an advanced stage.

483^ Background: Retrospective analyses have suggested that ERCC1 is a chemo-resistance marker to platinum compounds; a median tumoral ERCC1 level of 1.7 × 10–3ERCC1/β-actin mRNA has been reported in metastatic colon cancer (Grimminger et al, Pharmacogenomics J, 2011). MAVERICC is the first prospective study of tumoral ERCC1and plasma VEGF-A as potential biomarkers for oxaliplatin- and BV-containing regimens, respectively. We present data from a planned interim biomarker distribution assessment of the first 100 patients (pts) in MAVERICC. Methods: In this randomized, open-label, phase II study, pts (N=360) with histologically or cytologically confirmed CRC and ≥1 measurable metastatic lesion are stratified at screening by tumoral ERCC1 mRNA expression (low vs high, cutoff of ≤ vs >1.7). Stratified pts are randomized 1:1 to mFOLFOX6-BV or FOLFIRI-BV administered in 2-week cycles. The primary objectives are: 1) to assess ERCC1 and VEGF-A as biomarkers of progression-free survival (PFS) for oxaliplatin- and BV-containing 1st-line regimens, and 2) within ERCC1 high pts, to test whether FOLFIRI-BV is associated with a prolonged 1st-line PFS vs mFOLFOX6-BV. Results: With a data cutoff of June 19 2012, 100 pts have been enrolled. Of these, 75 pts were stratified to the ERCC1 high group and 25 pts to the ERCC1 low group. The median ERCC1 mRNA expression was 3.00 (range, 1.73–13.16) and 1.32 (range, 0.70–1.70) in the ERCC1 high and low stratification groups, respectively. Among all pts, the median ERCC1 mRNA expression was 2.37. Pt demographics by group are shown (Table). Plasma VEGF-A evaluation is ongoing. Conclusions: An analysis of the first 100 pts in MAVERICC showed that the median tumoral ERCC1 expression level was higher than the predefined cutoff, providing an adequate population of ERCC1 high pts to assess PFS by treatment regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT01374425. [Table: see text]

7073 Background: In preclinical studies, combinations of bortezomib and RT result in synergistic tumor killing (Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2007;59:207-15). Our group reported the results from the phase I portion of this study previously (J Clin Oncol. 200;28 (suppl; abstr 7085)). Based on these data, we undertook a phase II study of bortezomib in combination with paclitaxel/CBCDA and RT. Methods: Based on results from our previously reported phase I trial, systemic therapy included bortezomib (1.2 mg/m² IV days 1,4,8,11), paclitaxel (175 mg/m² IV day 2), and carboplatin (CBCDA; AUC=6 day 2) given every 3 weeks for 2 cycles. Thoracic radiotherapy (RT) included 60Gy/30 daily fractions starting day 1. The primary endpoint was the 12-month survival rate. If 41 or more of these 60 patients (68%) were alive at least 12 months after study entry, the trial would be deemed as positive and further study would be warranted. Results: 27 pts were enrolled to the phase II portion: M/F=17/10; stage IIIA/IIIB=13/14; ECOG PS 0/1=9/18; and median age: 58 (range 43-79). 18 pts (67%) completed therapy per protocol. At a planned interim analysis, 23 of 26 evaluable patients (88.5%, 95% CI: 70-98%) survived for at least 6 months, which exceeded the boundary of 21 or more needed to continue to full accrual. This trial could have continued per protocol, but was closed early due to slow accrual. With a median follow-up of 15.0 months in the 17 patients still alive, the 12-month survival rate was 71% (95% CI: 49 – 85). The median OS was 19 months (95% CI: 11 – no upper). Grade 3 or higher adverse events (regardless of attribution) were reported in 22 (82%) patients. Grade 4/5 adverse events were reported in 15 (56%) patients. There was one grade 5 event (pneumonitis). The most common (5 or more patients) grade 3/4 adverse events were fatigue (22%), leukopenia (63%), neutropenia (67%), and thrombocytopenia (44%). Conclusions: The addition of bortezomib resulted in high levels of severe hematologic toxicity, but also demonstrated evidence of activity with a 12-month survival rate of 71% and a median OS of 19 months. Further testing of this regimen in a larger study appears warranted.

4022 Background: Sonic Hh (SHh), the ligand for the Hh pathway, is over-expressed in >80% of PC. V, a small molecule antagonist of the Hh signaling pathway, has activity in preclinical PC models. Methods: We conducted a multi-center, placebo-controlled, phase IB/randomized phase II trial of GV or GP. Eligible pts, KPS 80-100, had previously untreated metastatic PC, or had completed adjuvant therapy > 6 months (mo) prior. Primary endpoint: progression-free survival (PFS). Correlatives: serial SHh serum levels; serial contrast perfusion CT imaging. To allow for early stopping due to lack of efficacy, a planned interim analysis was performed after approximately 50% of the expected number of PFS events occurred. The protocol stipulated that the trial would be terminated if the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis were the trial to continue (conditional power) was 2 over 30 minutes, days (D) 1, 8, 15, Q28D. Pts, stratified by KPS (80 v 90/100), and disease status (newly-diagnosed/recurrent), were randomized to V (150 mg PO daily) or P. For pts on P, cross-over was allowed at progression. Results: 70 evaluable pts (V/P 35/35) enrolled at 12 sites 2/10-6/11. Pt characteristics: median age 63/63 (range 49-79/48-82); KPS 80: 8/8; 90: 12/14; 100: 15/13. Grade 3/4 toxicity (%pts): neutropenia 20/26; hyponatremia 3/11; fatigue 9/6; hyperglycemia 14/6; elevated alkaline phosphatase 9/11. Response (%): complete 0/3, partial 0/11, stable disease 49/31. Median PFS: 3.7/2.4 mo (95% CI: 2.4-4.6/1.9-3.7; adjusted HR 0.92 [0.52-1.64]). Upon progression/unblinding, 23 GP pts crossed over to GV. Median overall survival (OS): 6.3/5.4 mo (95% CI:4.9-7.8/4.2-8.0, adjusted HR 0.97, [0.47-2.01]). 1-year survival (%): 24/24. Laboratory and radiological correlatives will be presented. Conclusions: GV has an acceptable toxicity profile. This trial did not meet criteria for futility at this interim analysis. The study is expected to complete accrual of 112 pts in February 2012. The final analysis will be reported after 90 events. Funded by NCI N01-CM-62201.

e18556 Background: Studies in the United States (US) have identified variation in incidence and survival of multiple myeloma (MM) patients of different races, and noted that MM is the most common hematologic cancer among African Americans. This analysis evaluated whether health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients in the US varies by race as they initiate treatment having been newly diagnosed with active, symptomatic MM. Methods: Data were collected in Connect MM, a prospective US observational registry begun in September 2009. Data on patient demographics and clinical characteristics were provided by clinicians. HRQOL was reported by patients at enrollment within 2 months of diagnosis. Patients completed the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), EQ-5D, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Multiple Myeloma (FACT-MM). Mean reported scores for BPI, EQ-5D and FACT-MM were analyzed by patient race. Statistical significance was ascertained by ANOVA using SAS 9.1. Results: Baseline HRQOL data were reported by 1144 patients (enrolled in 228 centers) of whom 82% were White, 13% Black, and 6% Other race. The cohorts did not differ statistically by ECOG status or by multiple myeloma stage (assessed by either the International Staging System or the Durie and Salmon system). Compared to non-Blacks, Black patients reported less anxiety/depression on the EQ-5D (p=0.030) and better emotional well-being on the FACT-MM (p=0.003). No other statistically significant differences were noted between cohorts on the BPI, other EQ-5D domains (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort), or other FACT-MM domains (physical, social/family, functional, and MM-specific considerations). Conclusions: Initial results from the Connect MM Registry indicate that baseline HRQOL prior to initiation of treatment may vary by patient race with respect to emotional well-being, and specifically anxiety/depression. These results serve as a baseline reference for future analyses. As patients in the Connect MM Registry proceed through therapy, analyses should be conducted of patients by race, among other characteristics and factors, to determine whether it may be associated with subsequent clinical outcomes and HRQOL over time.

8075 Background: The PI3K/Akt/mTOR axis is deregulated in lymphomas and is an emerging therapeutic target. We previously reported activity of temsirolimus (TEM) in DLBCL and FL (JCO 2010 28(31); however, the response duration was short. Lenalidomide (LEN) is an immunomodulatory agent with multiple anti-tumoral and microenvironmental effects, with activity across lymphoma subtypes. We are thus conducting a phase I/II study of TEM plus escalating doses of LEN. The phase I portion is completed. Methods: Patients (pts) had rel/ref lymphoma after >1 cytotoxic regimen. Other criteria: ANC > 1000/mL, platelets > 75,000/mL, nl renal and hepatic function, no VTE within 3 months, non-pregnant. A standard “3 + 3” design was used with dose levels (DL) listed (Table). TEM was given IV weekly and LEN was dosed orally on D1-D21, q28 days. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as cycle 1 grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity not responsive to standard supportive care, grade 4 thrombocytopenia > 7 days (or associated with bleeding or requiring more than 1 platelet transfusion), ANC < 500/mL > 7 days despite growth factors, or any thromboembolic event. Results: 18 pts (13M, 5F), med age 64 y (range, 42-80 y) were enrolled. 3 pts are ineval for DLT evaluation: one withdrew consent before starting treatment, 1 withdrew consent after a single dose, and 1 died of rapid disease progression after 1 dose. There was 1 DLT at DL1 and 2 DLTs at DL3 (Table). Adverse effects that did not meet DLT criteria: hypokalemia, hypertriglyceridemia, vomiting, urinary tract infection, skin infection, nausea, hypoxia, hyponatremia, diarrhea, and hyperglycemia (each occurring in one pt). There are 5 partial responses, 4 stable disease, 3 progressive disease, 2 not adequately assessed, and 4 still on active treatment. Conclusions: The combination of weekly intravenous TEM plus oral LEN is well-tolerated in a heavily pretreated group of pts with rel/ref lymphomas. The recommended phase II doses are TEM 25mg weekly plus LEN 20mg (D1-D21, q28d). [Table: see text]

8037 Background: Advances in the treatment of MM have greatly improved clinical outcomes for patients (pts). SPM occurrence has been observed in early and late stage MM as well as with increasing age. US SEER Cancer Registry reports a background incidence rate of SPM 2.1/100 person-yrs (PY) among persons ≥ 65 yrs of age. However, incidence of SPM in MM pts and the relationship to therapy still warrants further exploration. Methods: Connect MM is a US-based observational registry designed to characterize pts with newly diagnosed MM from 266 US sites. Initiated in Sep 2009, patient data were collected at baseline and each subsequent quarter with a standardized form. On Dec 14, 2011, Connect MM reached full enrollment at 1,500 pts. Results: As of Jan 13, 2012, preliminary retrospective SPM data is available for 1015 pts. Median age was 67 yrs, 56.8% male, and median follow-up was 10.6 mo (0.03-24.9 mo). 12 pts (7 male) with median age of 68.5 yrs developed SPM. Median time to SPM was 8.5 mo (0.8-17.7 mo) after treatment initiation. 11 invasive SPM were observed - 4 hematological (heme): 1 AML, 1 MDS, 1 CMML and 1 DLBCL, and 7 solid: 2 melanoma skin, 1 bronchus, 1 breast, 1 prostate, 1 tonsil, and 1 gastric carcinoid. Also, 1 pt had non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), and 1 pt with invasive skin cancer also had NMSC. Of the 4 pts developing heme SPM, 3 had bortezomib (BORT), 1 had thalidomide (THAL), 1 had lenalidomide (LEN), 2 had melphalan (MEL), and all 4 pts had steroids. Of the 7 pts who developed solid tumor SPM, 5 had BORT, 5 had LEN, 2 had doxorubicin, 1 had MEL, 5 had steroids, 1 had irradiation, and 1 had not received MM treatment. 2 pts with prior history of invasive malignancy developed solid tumor SPM (1 pt also developed NMSC).1 pt who received irradiation developed NMSC. Early overall incidence of invasive SPM was 1.21/100 PY (95% CI 0.60, 2.16) for all pts and 1.20/100 PY (95% CI 0.44,2.62) for pts ≥ 65 yrs of age. Conclusions: This preliminary analysis shows that SPM occurred at an expected rate in this disease specific registry of patients with NDMM and appeared to occur irrespective of MM treatment administered. Incidence rates of SPM may increase over time as patients receive transplantation and alkylators. Prospective observation will continue.

TPS3635^ Background: The identification of prognostic and predictive biomarkers could significantly improve the risk-benefit ratio and cost-effectiveness of 1st-line mCRC regimens. This is the first prospective study of tumoral ERCC1 (chemo-resistance marker to platinum compounds) and plasma VEGF-A as potential biomarkers for oxaliplatin- and BV-containing regimens, respectively, in an effort to further define the optimal chemotherapy backbone with biologic therapies, including BV, for mCRC. Methods: In this randomized, open-label, global, phase II study, patients (N=360) with histologically or cytologically confirmed CRC and ≥1 measurable metastatic lesion are stratified at screening by tumoral ERCC1 mRNA expression (high vs low, cutoff of 1.7 [ERCC1/β-actin mRNA]). Eligibility criteria include completion of adjuvant therapy >12 months before screening and an ECOG performance status ≤1. Blood samples are collected to quantify plasma VEGF-A levels. Patients within each ERCC1 stratification group are randomized 1:1 to mFOLFOX6-BV or FOLFIRI-BV administered in 2-week cycles. BV will be given at a dose of 5 mg/kg IV q2w. Patients will remain on study treatment until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. If oxaliplatin or irinotecan need to be discontinued, BV and 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine are to be continued until PD. The primary objectives are: 1) to assess ERCC1 and VEGF-A as biomarkers of progression-free survival (PFS) for oxaliplatin- and BV-containing regimens in 1st-line mCRC, and 2) within ERCC1 high patients, to test whether FOLFIRI-BV is associated with a prolonged 1st-line PFS compared to mFOLFOX6-BV. Secondary objectives include assessing the impact of these markers on overall survival, objective response, hepatic metastases resection, and safety. Exploratory endpoints include correlative analyses with additional tumor tissue, blood, and SNP markers. The first patient was enrolled in August 2011. An interim biomarker distribution assessment of the first 100 patients is planned, and the evaluation of the primary endpoints is estimated for early 2015. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01374425.

7555 Background: In a retrospective exploratory analysis of E4599, patients (pts) > 70 yo had a higher frequency of and more severe toxicities without apparent survival benefit from the addition of B to C+paclitaxel. We hypothesized that in this pt population, B will have better safety and efficacy profile when used in combination with C+P. Methods: Pts >/= 70 yo with previously untreated stage IIIB/IV (TNM 6th ed) nonsquamous NSCLC, ECOG PS 0-1, measurable disease and adequate organ function were eligible. C at AUC 6, P at 500 mg/m2 and B at 15 mg/kg were administered on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles followed by maintenance P+B in patients with CR, PR or SD. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The treatment would be considered promising based on a single arm one-stage binomial design if 34 or more successes out of 55 patients were observed. This design had an exact significance level of 0.05 at 93% power to detect a true success rate of at least 70%. Polymorphisms in VEGFA, FPGS, GGH, SLC19A1 and TYMS in germline DNA were correlated with treatment outcome. Results: 58 eligible pts were enrolled; 29 males/29 females. Median age was 75. Median treatment cycles received was 6. Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AE) were reported in 49 (85%) pts. There were no treatment-related deaths. The most common grade 3/4 AEs(regardless of attribution) were hypertension (10%), fatigue (28%), dehydration (9%), neutropenia (43%) and thrombocytopenia (21%). There were 3 (5%) grade 3/4 hemorrhagic events. 8 (14%) had grade 4 neutropenia and 3 (5%) had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3/4 ischemic/thromboembolic events occurred in 6 pts (10%). Thirty-four out of the first 54 (63%, 95% CI: 48.7-75.7%) evaluable pts met the primary endpoint (4 pts were lost to follow-up prior to 6 months). The confirmed ORR was 37.9% (95% CI: 25.5-51.6%). Median time to treatment failure was 4.8 months (95% CI: 3.9-6.4). Median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI: 5.9-11.7), median OS was 13.7 months (95% CI: 9.4-15.7). Results of SNP analysis will be presented. Conclusions: C+P+B followed by maintenance P+B is an active and tolerable first-line regimen for elderly patients with good PS.

7027 Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling plays a key role in MM biology. In preclinical models, agents that target VEGF inhibit MM growth. In phase II trials, several VE...

Abstract 2081 Poster Board II-58 AZD6244 is an orally bioavailable small molecule inhibitor of the MEK kinase. MEK is downstream of the RAS/RAF pathway, which is activated by mutations occurring in RAS as well as mutations and/or overexpression of upstream receptor tyrosine kinases such as FLT3 and c-KIT in AML. In addition, elevated levels of phosphorylated-ERK (p-ERK), the only known substrate of MEK, have been demonstrated in >75% of patients(pts) with AML, and MEK inhibition of primary AML cells in vitro results in growth arrest. AZD6244 was well tolerated in phase I trials in advanced solid tumors and had a favorable pharmacokinetic profile; the recommended phase II dose was 100mg twice daily. We hypothesized that in AML, a MEK inhibitor would lead to inhibition of RAS-mediated signal transduction, with subsequent antiproliferative effects and inhibition of the leukemia clone. We report our experience with the first clinical trial utilizing a MEK inhibitor in advanced AML. Methods: 47 pts were enrolled on a Phase II multicenter study of AZD6244 in relapsed/refractory AML. Median age was 69 years (range, 26-83 yrs) with 57% males. ECOG performance status at baseline was 0, 1 and 2, respectively, in 12, 27 and 8 pts. 14 pts (30%) were previously untreated for AML and >60 yrs; 11 of these pts had received prior therapy for an antecedent hematologic disorder (AHD); 1 had therapy-related AML (t-AML) and only 2 pts (4%) had previously untreated de novo AML. 6 pts (13%) had AML in first relapse, 14 (30%) had AML beyond first relapse, and 13 (27%) had primary refractory disease. 4% had good risk cytogenetics, 28% intermediate risk, 49% poor risk, and 19% had other or unknown cytogenetics. Overall, 53% had AML that had evolved from an AHD and/or t-AML. Ten pts had a FLT3 ITD or TKD, 36 had no FLT3 mutation detected, and FLT3 mutational status was unknown in 1. Median number of prior therapies for AML and/or MDS was 2 (range, 0-6). AZD6244 was given at 100mg twice daily without interruption; cycles were repeated every 28 days. Dose modifications and/or delays occurred for grade 3&4 non-hematologic toxicities, or prolonged grade1&2 toxicities. Peripheral blood and/or marrow samples were obtained at baseline for mutational analysis (RAS/c-KIT/FLT3), and at serial time points to measure p-ERK. Results: Daily AZD6244 was tolerable. 42 pts are evaluable for efficacy and safety. Median number of cycles administered was 1 (range, 1-9). 19 pts (40%) received ≥2 cycles. 4 pts required dose reduction. The most common drug-related toxicities were grade 1&2 diarrhea, nausea, fatigue and vomiting, occurring in 43%, 36%, 31% and 24%, respectively. Grade 3&4 adverse events possibly related to AZD6244 included fatigue, nausea and dehydration, occurring in 7%, 5% and 5%, respectively. 4 pts had a minor response (defined as >50% decline in peripheral blood and/or marrow blasts lasting 4 weeks). 2 additional patients also had >50% decline in marrow blasts but did not have a follow up confirmatory biopsy. In 1 of these pts, the decline in blasts was associated with sustained improvement in platelets (>100K/uL) lasting 4 months. 6 additional pts had evidence of disease stabilization, lasting a median of 34 days (range, 21-222+ days). Analysis of p-ERK by flow cytometry has just been intiated, and in the first 3 pts analyzed, baseline p-ERK levels were low, and none of these pts responded. In contrast, p-mTOR levels (downstream of the PI3 Kinase pathway) were significantly elevated in these same pts. Conclusions: Administration of the oral MEK inhibitor AZD6244 is feasible in AML. Modest evidence of antileukemic activity has been observed, consistent with the predicted cytostatic activity of this class of drugs. Analysis of the effect of AZD6244 on p-ERK and signaling intermediates of the PI3 Kinase pathway such as p-mTOR is ongoing. Given its modest toxicity profile, AZD6244 should be investigated further in combination with drugs that target other critical signaling pathways and/or dysregulated transcriptional pathways in AML. Sponsored by NCI grant NO1-CM-62201 Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

525 Background: Risedronate is used for preventing postmenopausal osteoporosis. Its effect in preventing bone loss in premenopausal women undergoing chemotherapy for BC is unknown. Methods: A randomized, placebo controlled, double blind phase III trial assessed the effect of risedronate in premenopausal women undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy for BC (Stage I-IIIB). Women ≥ 18 years were randomized to risedronate 35 mg weekly or placebo for 1 year; all pts received daily calcium 600 mg/vitamin D 400 units. Chemotherapy regimens included anthracyclines, taxanes, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, or fluorouracil, with a mean duration of 146 days. Patients were stratified by tamoxifen, taxane use, time from last menses, and age. The primary endpoint was the change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline to 1 year. A two-sided two-sample t-test with 200 patients had 80% power to detect a 5% difference in the change over 12 months between treatment groups with a 5% Type I error rate. Linear regres...

15573 Background: Ispinesib is a novel kinesin spindle protein inhibitor that has significant antitumor activity in multiple tumor models and has demonstrated preliminary clinical activity in early phase I and II trials. A phase II study of Ispenisib in patients with metastatic RCC who had received at least one prior therapy was thus conducted. Methods: The primary objective was to assess the RECIST based overall response rate (RR) with optimal Simon two-stage design utilizing 10% and 30% RR as the null and alternative hypotheses, respectively. Eighteen pts were to be accrued during the first stage; if 3 or more responses (PR or CR) were seen, an additional 17 pts would be accrued. Further study would be recommended if 7 or more of the 35 total pts had a response. Secondary objectives included toxicity, time to progression, and overall survival. Pts were treated with 7 mg/m2 over one hour on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days with radiologic disease re- evaluation every 8 weeks. Results: 19 pts were accrued in 6 months. Baseline characteristics included clear cell histology in 74%, papillary in 11%, and unclassified in 11%; 1 or =2 prior therapies in 37% and 63%; prior immunotherapy in 53%, and prior sunitinib, sorafenib or bevacizumab in 79%; ECOG performance status 0 in 58% and 1 in 42%. 4 patients are too early for radiologic assessment. None of the 15 patients evaluable responded to treatment (95% CI: 0 - 21.8%). Seven patients (47%) experienced stable disease after 8 weeks. One patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia. No other grade 3 or 4 toxicities were attributable to drug. Grade 1 and 2 toxicities included: fatigue (28%), anemia (28%), leukopenia (33%), elevated alkaline phosphatase (18%), anorexia (11%), hyponatremia (11%), dyspnea (11%), headache (11%), and hypoalbuminemia (11%). Conclusions: Treatment with weekly Ispenesib in metastatic RCC is well tolerated but does not lead to objective responses. Under the hypothesis that Ispenesib is a cytotoxic rather than cytostatic agent, further evaluation in patients with metastatic RCC at this dose and schedule is not indicated. Supported by: NCI #N01-CM-62201 No significant financial relationships to disclose.