Search

Semi-arid regions with Mediterranean-type climates harbor exceptional biodiversity, but are increasingly threatened by invading exotic annual species and climatic changes, including drought. In semi-arid ecosystems, antecedent conditions often influence plant growth, but the role of antecedent conditions for drought response and recovery of native versus exotic species remains largely unexplored. From 2013 to 2016, we imposed experimental rainfall treatments (average rainfall, moderate or severe drought) in plots under a native shrub canopy and in inter-spaces dominated by herbaceous vegetation, and quantified growth (peak biomass) and abundance (cover) of native and exotic herbaceous species. The following year, we quantified recovery from the drought treatments (2017). Exotic biomass was less resistant to drought (declined more than native biomass), but was more resilient (increased more than native biomass in the year following drought), especially in unshaded inter-spaces between shrubs. These responses were associated with life history; annual species responded more negatively to drought in the inter-spaces than perennial species. Current years' rainfall was a better predictor of biomass than prior rainfall, but antecedent factors were also important. After four years of rainfall treatments, exotic species had the highest growth recovery in the severe drought treatment, while growth of natives had the opposite response. In contrast, litter was positively associated with plant growth regardless of origin. This study demonstrates that when native and exotic species differ in life history, as they do in Mediterranean climate ecosystems, they may respond differently to antecedent factors, and hence differ in recovery from climate extremes such as drought.

Community assembly and coexistence theories predict that both fitness and plant functional traits should influence competitive interactions between native and invasive species. The evolution of the increased competitive ability hypothesis predicts that species will grow larger (a measure of fitness) in their invaded than native range; hence we hypothesized that species might exert greater competitive effects in their invaded range, lessening the importance of functional traits for competitive outcomes. In a greenhouse experiment we compared traits and competitive interactions between Bromus madritensis (an annual grass) and resident species from its native range in Spain, and its invaded range in Southern California. As predicted, B. madritensis collected in California grew larger and had a greater competitive effect on resident species than B. madritensis collected in Spain. However, residents from California also suppressed the growth of B. madritensis more than species from its native range in Spain. Competitive interaction strengths were predicted by different suites of traits in the native versus invaded range of B. madritensis; surprisingly, however, size of the resident species (fitness), did not predict variation in competitive interactions. This study shows that different suites of traits may aid in identifying those native species likely to strongly compete with invaders, versus those that will be competitively suppressed by invaders, with important implications for the design of restoration efforts aimed at promoting native species growth and preventing invasion. More generally, our study shows that fitness differences may not be as important as traits when predicting competitive outcomes in this system.