Search

Background: A standard treatment for fit, older patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is yet to be established. In the previous EXTREME trial, few older patients were included. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of an adapted EXTREME regimen in fit, older patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC., Methods: This single-arm, phase 2 study was done at 22 centres in France. Eligible patients were aged 70 years or older and assessed as not frail (fit) using the ELAN Geriatric Evaluation (EGE) and had recurrent or metastatic HNSCC in the first-line setting that was not eligible for local therapy (surgery or radiotherapy), and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. The adapted EXTREME regimen consisted of six cycles of fluorouracil 4000 mg/m 2 on days 1-4, carboplatin with an area under the curve of 5 on day 1, and cetuximab on days 1, 8, and 15 (400 mg/m 2 on cycle 1-day 1, and 250 mg/m 2 subsequently), all intravenously, with cycles starting every 21 days. In patients with disease control after two to six cycles, cetuximab 500 mg/m 2 was continued once every 2 weeks as maintenance therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was systematically administered and erythropoietin was recommended during chemotherapy. The study was based on the two-stage Bryant and Day design, combining efficacy and toxicity endpoints. The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate at week 12 after the start of treatment, assessed by central review (with an unacceptable rate of ≤15%). The primary toxicity endpoint was morbidity, defined as grade 4-5 adverse events, or cutaneous rash (grade ≥3) that required cetuximab to be discontinued, during the chemotherapy phase, or a decrease in functional autonomy (Activities of Daily Living score decrease ≥2 points from baseline) at 1 month after the end of chemotherapy (with an unacceptable morbidity rate of >40%). Analysis of the coprimary endpoints, and of safety in the chemotherapy phase, was based on the per-protocol population, defined as eligible patients who received at least one cycle of the adapted EXTREME regimen. Safety in the maintenance phase was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of cetuximab as maintenance therapy. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01864772, and is completed., Findings: Between Sept 27, 2013, and June 20, 2018, 85 patients were enrolled, of whom 78 were in the per-protocol population. 66 (85%) patients were male and 12 (15%) were female, and the median age was 75 years (IQR 72-79). The median number of chemotherapy cycles received was five (IQR 3-6). Objective response at week 12 was observed in 31 patients (40% [95% CI 30-51]) and morbidity events were observed in 24 patients (31% [22-42]). No fatal adverse events occurred. Four patients presented with a decrease in functional autonomy 1 month after the end of chemotherapy versus baseline. During chemotherapy, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were haematological events (leukopenia [22 patients; 28%], neutropenia [20; 26%], thrombocytopenia [15; 19%], and anaemia [12; 15%]), oral mucositis (14; 18%), fatigue (11; 14%), rash acneiform (ten; 13%), and hypomagnesaemia (nine; 12%). Among 44 patients who received cetuximab during the maintenance phase, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hypomagnesaemia (six patients; 14%) and acneiform rash (six; 14%)., Interpretation: The study met its primary objectives on objective response and morbidity, and showed overall survival to be as good as in younger patients treated with standard regimens, indicating that the adapted EXTREME regimen could be used in older patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC who are deemed fit with use of a geriatric evaluation tool adapted to patients with head and neck cancer, such as the EGE., Funding: French programme PAIR-VADS 2011 (sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, the Fondation ARC, and the Ligue Contre le Cancer), Sandoz, GEFLUC, and GEMLUC., Translation: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JG has been an advisory board member for BMS, Hookipa, MSD, Merck, Nanobiotix, and Roche, outside the submitted work; reports personal fees from MSD, outside the submitted work; and has received grant support during the study, paid to his institution, from the GEMLUC and GEFLUC, and the French National Cancer Institute, the Fondation ARC, and the Ligue Contre le Cancer, through the French programme PAIR-VADS 2011. F-RF reports travel support for congress from Merck Serono, outside the submitted work. ES-B reports personal fees from MSD and Merck Serono, and support for attending meetings or travel, or both, from MSD and Merck Serono, outside the submitted work. JF reports personal fees and non-financial support from MSD and Merck, and personal fees from AstraZeneca, BMS, Roche, Rakuten, Elevar, Hookipa, Sanofi, and Seagen, during the conduct of the study; and has been an advisory board member for Roche, Seagen, and Elevar, outside the submitted work. FR reports personal fees and non-financial support from Merck, outside the submitted work. CF reports personal fees from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Biogaran, BMS, Chugai Pharma France, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, GSK, Leo Pharma, Lilly, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Seagen, and Viatris, and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, Janssen Oncology, Leo Pharma, and Pierre Fabre, outside the submitted work. TC reports personal fees from Merck and has been an advisory board member for MSD outside the submitted work. PDa reports personal fees from Lilly and has been advisory board member for Pfizer and MSD, outside the submitted work. SL has participated on advisory boards of Merck and BMS, outside the submitted work. AA reports grants from the French programme PAIR-VADS 2011 funded by the French National Cancer Institute, the Fondation ARC, and the Ligue Contre le Cancer, and grants from Sandoz, during the conduct of the study, and other from MSD, outside the submitted work; all paid to her institution. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: At present, there is no established standard treatment for frail older patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of cetuximab to those of methotrexate (the reference regimen) in this population., Methods: This randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial was done at 20 hospitals in France. Patients aged 70 years or older, assessed as frail by the ELAN Geriatric Evaluation, with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the first-line setting and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive cetuximab 500 mg/m 2 intravenously every 2 weeks or methotrexate 40 mg/m 2 intravenously every week, with minimisation by ECOG performance status, type of disease evolution, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, serum albumin concentration, and geriatrician consultation. To avoid deterministic minimisation and assure allocation concealment, patients were allocated with a probability of 0·80 to the treatment that most reduced the imbalance. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurred first. The primary endpoint was failure-free survival (defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression, death, discontinuation of treatment, or loss of 2 or more points on the Activities in Daily Living scale, whichever occurred first) and was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. 151 failures expected out of 164 patients were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·625 with 0·05 alpha error, with 80% power. A futility interim analysis was planned when approximately 80 failures were observed, based on failure-free survival. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01884623) and was stopped for futility after the interim analysis., Findings: Between Nov 7, 2013, and April 23, 2018, 82 patients were enrolled (41 to the cetuximab group and 41 to the methotrexate group); 60 (73%) were male, 37 (45%) were aged 80 years or older, 35 (43%) had an ECOG performance status of 2, and 36 (44%) had metastatic disease. Enrolment was stopped for futility at the interim analysis. At the final analysis, median follow-up was 43·3 months (IQR 30·8-52·1). At data cutoff, all 82 patients had failure; failure-free survival did not differ significantly between the groups (median 1·4 months [95% CI 1·0-2·1] in the cetuximab group vs 1·9 months [1·1-2·6] in the methotrexate group; adjusted HR 1·03 [95% CI 0·66-1·61], p=0·89). The frequency of patients who had grade 3 or worse adverse events was 63% (26 of 41) in the cetuximab group and 73% (30 of 41) in the methotrexate group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the cetuximab group were fatigue (four [10%] of 41 patients), lung infection (four [10%]), and rash acneiform (four [10%]), and those in the methotrexate group were fatigue (nine [22%] of 41), increased gamma-glutamyltransferase (seven [17%]), natraemia disorder (four [10%]), anaemia (four [10%]), leukopenia (four [10%]), and neutropenia (four [10%]). The frequency of patients who had serious adverse events was 44% (18 of 41) in the cetuximab group and 39% (16 of 41) in the methotrexate group. Four patients presented with a fatal adverse event in the cetuximab group (sepsis, decreased level of consciousness, pulmonary oedema, and death of unknown cause) as did two patients in the methotrexate group (dyspnoea and death of unknown cause)., Interpretation: The study showed no improvement in failure-free survival with cetuximab versus methotrexate. Patients with an ECOG performance status of 2 did not benefit from these systemic therapies. New treatment options including immunotherapy should be explored in frail older patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, after an initial geriatric evaluation, such as the ELAN Geriatric Evaluation., Funding: French programme PAIR-VADS 2011 (sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, the Fondation ARC and the Ligue Contre le Cancer), GEMLUC, GEFLUC, and Merck Santé., Translation: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JG has been an advisory board member for Bristol Myers Squibb, Hookipa Pharma, MSD, Merck, Nanobiotix, and Roche, outside the submitted work; reports support for attending meetings or travel, or both, from Merck and MSD; and received grant support, paid to his institution, from the GEMLUC (Groupement des Entreprises Monégasques dans la Lutte Contre le Cancer and GEFLUC (Groupement des Entreprises Françaises dans la Lutte contre le Cancer), and the French National Cancer Institute, the Fondation ARC, and the Ligue Contre le Cancer, through the French programme PAIR-VADS. CE reports receiving consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Elevar, F-star Therapeutics, Innate Pharma, Merck Serono, MSD, and Novartis outside the submitted work; and support for attending meetings or travel, or both, from MSD and Merck Serono. PDe reports personal fees from LEO Pharma and Pfizer, and support for attending meetings or travel, or both, from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. JF reports personal fees from MSD, Merck, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, AstraZeneca, Seagen, Hookipa, and Elevar; has been an advisory board member for Roche, Seagen, and Elevar; and reports support for attending meetings or travel, or both, from MSD and Merck, outside the submitted work. ESB reports personal fees from MSD and Merck Serono, and support for attending meetings or travel, or both, from MSD and Merck Serono, outside the submitted work. PDa reports personal fees from Gilead Science and support for attending meetings or travel from Lilly, or both, and has been an advisory board member for Pfizer, outside the submitted work. CF reports personal fees from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Biogaran, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, GSK, Leo Pharma, Lilly, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Seagen, and Viatris; and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, Janssen Oncology, Đeo Pharma, and Pierre Fabre, outside the submitted work. JB reports support for attending meetings from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Nanobiotix, and MSD; participated on advisory boards for Merck, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Nanobiotix, and Roche; and reports consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Nanobiotix, MSD, and Roche, outside the submitted work. AA has been an advisory member for MSD, outside the submitted work; and received grant support, paid to their institution, from the French National Cancer Institute, the Fondation ARC and the Ligue Contre le Cancer for a study grant through the French programme PAIR-VADS. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the oncological outcome after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for oligoprogressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (omCRPC) patients., Materials-Methods: In this retrospective, observational, multi-institutional study, omCRPC patients (≤5 metastases) underwent SBRT. Primary endpoint was systemic therapy escalation-free survival (STE-FS) after SBRT. Local relapse (LR), distant (DP) and isolated biochemical (iBP) progressions were reported with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Prognostic factors for STE-FS were investigated. Toxicity was reported., Results: From 01/07 to 09/19, 50 pts with omCRPC underwent SBRT. With a MFU of 23 months [3---100], median STE-FS was 13.1 months (95 %CI 10.8 - 36.4). Median OS was not reached and PFS was 13 months (CI95% 10.1 - 20.8). Post-SBRT PSA remained stable or decreased in 19 pts (38 %). Progression events (LR, DP, iBP) were observed in 34 pts (68 %), among whom 6 relapsed in the irradiated area (local control rate: 88 %). DP and iBP were observed in 28 pts (56 %) and 4 pts (8 %) respectively. In multivariate analysis, post-SBRT biochemical response was an independent prognostic factor for STE-FS. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity occurred in 2 pts., Conclusion: With excellent local control and tolerance, SBRT for omCRPC patients represents an acceptable approach to defer systemic therapeutic escalation and prevent its side effects. Accurate patient selection for SBRT requires more data with longer follow-up and higher numbers of patients pending the results of upcoming randomized trials., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Medulloblastoma is one of the most prevalent solid tumors found in children, occurring in the brain's posterior fossa. The standard treatment protocol involves maximal resection surgery followed by craniospinal irradiation and chemotherapy. Despite a long-term survival rate of 70%, wide disparities among patients have been observed. The identification of pertinent targets for both initial and recurrent medulloblastoma cases is imperative. Both primary and recurrent medulloblastoma are marked by their aggressive infiltration into surrounding brain tissue, robust angiogenesis, and resistance to radiotherapy. While the significant role of integrin-αvβ3 in driving these characteristics has been extensively documented in glioblastoma, its impact in the context of medulloblastoma remains largely unexplored. Integrin-αvβ3 was found to be expressed in a subset of patients with medulloblastoma. We investigated the role of integrin-αvβ3 using medulloblastoma-derived cell lines with β3-subunit depletion or overexpression both in vitro and in vivo settings. By generating radioresistant medulloblastoma cell lines, we uncovered an increased integrin-αvβ3 expression, which correlated with increased susceptibility to pharmacologic integrin-αvβ3 inhibition with cilengitide, a competitive ligand mimetic. Finally, we conducted single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/MRI studies on orthotopic models using a radiolabeled integrin-αvβ3 ligand (99mTc-RAFT-RGD). This innovative approach presents the potential for a novel predictive imaging technique in the realm of medulloblastoma. Altogether, our findings lay the foundation for employing SPECT/MRI to identify a specific subset of patients with medulloblastoma eligible for integrin-αvβ3-directed therapies. This breakthrough offers a pathway toward more targeted and effective interventions in the treatment of medulloblastoma., Significance: This study demonstrates integrin-αvβ3's fundamental role in medulloblastoma tumorigenicity and radioresistance and the effect of its expression on cilengitide functional activity., (© 2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: This study compares the outcome of patients suffering from medically refractory classical trigeminal neuralgia (TN) after treatment with radiosurgery using two different shot sizes (5- and 6-mm)., Methods: All patients included in this open, prospective, non-controlled study were treated in a single institution for TN (95 cases in 93 patients) with LINear ACcelerators (LINAC) single-dose radiosurgery using a 5-mm shot (43 cases) or 6-mm shot (52 cases). The target was positioned on the intracisternal part of the trigeminal nerve., Results: The mean Dmax (D0.035) to the brainstem was higher in the 6-mm group: 12.6 vs 21.3 Gy (p < 0.001). Pain relief was significantly better in the 6-mm group: at 12 and 24 months in the 6-mm group the rate of pain-free patients was 90.2 and 87.8%, respectively vs. 73.6 and 73.6% in the 5-mm group (p = 0.045). At 12 and 24 months post-radiosurgical hypoesthesia was more frequent in the 6-mm group: 47.0 and 58% vs.11.3 and 30.8% in the 5-mm group (p = 0.002). To investigate the effect of cone diameter and the dose to the brainstem on outcomes, patients were stratified into three groups: group 1 = 5-mm shot, (all Dmax < 25 Gy, 43 cases), group 2 = 6-mm shot, Dmax < 25 Gy (32 cases), group 3 = 6-mm shot Dmax > 25 Gy (20 cases). At 12 months the rates of hypoesthesia were 11.3, 33.5 and 76.0%, respectively in groups 1, 2 and 3 (p < 0.001) and the rates of recurrence of pain were 26.4, 16.5 and 5%, respectively, (p = 0.11)., Conclusion: LINAC treatment with a 6-mm shot provided excellent control of pain, but increased the rate of trigeminal nerve dysfunction, especially when the maximum dose to the brainstem was higher than 25 Gy., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a non-invasive technique that enables to create brain focal lesions with a high precision and localization. Thus, functional brain disorders can be treated by SRS in case of pharmacoresistance or inoperability. To date, treatment of trigeminal neuralgia is the most described and known indication. Other indications will be developed in the future like movement disorders, refractory epilepsy, obsessive compulsive disorder and severe depression. We present here a review of actual and future indications of functional brain SRS with their level of evidence. All these SRS treatments have to be strictly conducted by trained teams with an excellent collaboration between radiation physicists, medical physicists, neurosurgeons, neurologists, psychiatrists and probably neuroradiologists., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Elderly head and neck cancer (HNC) patients are very rarely enrolled in clinical trials, and even more so in dedicated trials in curative or palliative setting. As a result, no standards of treatment exist for this population and thus, adaptation of standard treatments is commonly used., Recent Findings: The choice between a monotherapy and a platinum-cetuximab combination is based on the performance status, which is not suitable and/or sufficient to evaluate the patient ability to receive a systemic treatment combined or not with radiotherapy. The evaluation of functional age using geriatric assessment is recommended. However, access to comprehensive geriatric assessment is limited in many centers, and the choice of the type of treatment is often not based on objective and reproducible criteria. As a result, fragile elderly HNC patients may be overtreated with a risk of increased toxicity and fit patients proposed for suboptimal treatment with a risk of failure of tumor control., Summary: It is therefore crucial to develop and evaluate customized treatments by enrolling elderly HNC patients in dedicated therapeutics trials, such as the ELAN (Elderly Head and Neck Cancer) studies or new approaches involving promising immunotherapies. To administer the most suitable therapy, a simple and reproducible geriatric assessment could efficiently guide practitioners.

The purpose of this work is to assess eight detectors performance for output factor (OF), percent depth dose (PDD), and beam profiles in a 6-MV Clinac stereotactic radiosurgery mode for cone irradiation using Monte Carlo simulation as reference. Cones with diameters comprised between 30 and 4 mm have been studied. The evaluated detectors were ionization chambers: pinpoint and pinpoint 3D, diodes: SRS, P and E, Edge, MicroDiamond and EBT3 radiochromic films. The results showed that pinpoints underestimate OF up to -2.3% for cone diameters ≥10 mm and down to -12% for smaller cones. Both nonshielded (SRS and E) and shielded diodes (P and Edge) overestimate the OF respectively up to 3.3% and 5.2% for cone diameters ≥10 mm and in both cases more than 7% for smaller cones. MicroDiamond slightly overestimates the OF, 3.7% for all the cones and EBT3 film is the closest to Monte Carlo with maximum difference of ±1% whatever the cone size is. For the profiles and the PDD, particularly for the small cones, the size of the detector predominates. All diodes and EBT3 agree with the simulation within ±0.2 mm for beam profiles determination. For PDD curve all the active detectors response agree with simulation up to 1% for all the cones. EBT3 is the more accurate detector for beam profiles and OF determinations of stereotactic cones but it is restrictive to use. Due to respectively inappropriate size of the sensitive volume and composition, pinpoints and diodes do not seem appropriate without OF corrective factors below 10 mm diameter cone. MicroDiamond appears to be the best detector for OF determination regardless all cones. For off-axis measurements, the size of the detector predominates and for PDD all detectors give promising results., (© 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Thirty percent of patients with head and neck cancer are over 70 years. Radiotherapy approach in elderly is a challenge. On one hand, radiotherapy side effects, as well as the number of sessions required, could be a burden. On the other hand, omission of local treatment is not an option due to the symptoms of the tumor. Patients in good general condition may receive standard fractionnated radiotherapy. For frail patients unsuitable for standard fractionated radiotherapy, more convenient shorter course of radiotherapy are commonly used. Physicians have to choose the best radiotherapy schedule according to the objective of the treatment. In case of palliative intend: hypofractionated radiotherapy delivered with a single short course could be recommanded. This course could be followed by other subsequent courses if the patient's condition improves during the treatment. For patients treated in curative intend, the choice of hypofractionation schedule depends on the general condition: split course hypofractionated radiotherapy for unfit patients, or accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant boost for fit patients. In all cases, a high-quality radiotherapy technique and appropriate supportive care are mandatory to minimize the side effects. The ELAN RT trial, soon to be completed, will rule on the non-inferiority of hypofractionated radiotherapy compared to standard radiotherapy for unfit patients., (Copyright © 2018 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)