Search

Simple Summary: Allowing cats outdoor access can impact cat health, owner health, and wildlife. However, veterinarian and cat owner discussions about outdoor access can be challenging. This study explored the frequency that veterinarians discussed indoor–outdoor cat topics with clients and the perceived importance of the topics. The most often discussed topics were cat health issues (infectious diseases and trauma) and cat population control. Topics such as zoonoses and impact on wildlife were discussed less often. Cat health issues (diseases and trauma) were also selected by over half of the responding veterinarians as the most import topic when addressing indoor–outdoor cats with clients. The One Health topics "human–animal bond impacts", "environmental and wildlife impacts", and "benefits for the cat" were selected as the least important to the veterinarian and client when addressing indoor–outdoor cats. The majority of respondents indicated that they were familiar with One Health. However, only 13% indicated they were extremely comfortable discussing One Health with clients, which might explain the reason for not leveraging One Health topics when addressing indoor–outdoor cats with clients. Not including more One Health topics in discussions is a potentially missed opportunity to educate clients and enable informed decisions. Veterinarian and client discussions about indoor–outdoor cats, although challenging, can impact decisions made regarding cat care and outdoor access. An online survey, exploring topics discussed with clients regarding indoor–outdoor cats and One Health, was made available to veterinarians practicing in the U.S. in 2022. The importance of topics by practice location and to the veterinarian versus what the veterinarian perceived as important to the client were analyzed. Of 280 responding veterinarians, 95% discussed indoor–outdoor cat activities with clients. Cat-associated disease (81%), cat population control (64%), and cat-associated trauma (53%) were discussed most often. With the exception of population control, rural, suburban, and urban veterinarians did not significantly differ in the frequency of topics discussed. Danger to the cat (e.g., trauma and diseases) was the most important topic when addressing indoor–outdoor cats with clients; 57% of veterinarians considered it important to themselves and 61% considered it important to the client. Only 13% of the veterinarians were extremely comfortable discussing One Health with clients and several One Health-related topics (zoonoses and wildlife impacts) were discussed least often. Less focus on One Health topics is potentially a missed opportunity to educate clients, enable more informed client decisions, and improve overall the care of cats. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sarcocystis is a food‐borne zoonotic protozoan whose final hosts are humans, dogs, cats, and other carnivores and intermediate hosts are birds and mammals, especially humans and herbivores. Humans become infected by eating raw and undercooked meat contaminated with bradyzoites or by consuming water or food contaminated with the sporocyst stage of the parasite. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of gamma radiation and electron beam on the survival rate of Sarcocystis bradyzoites in infected beef and to determine the effective dose. Methods: Three replicates of 100 g of infected meat were treated with different doses (0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 kGy). As a control, 20 g of contaminated meat was stored separately at 4°C. The viability of the bradyzoites after digestion in pepsin solution was assessed, stained (trypan blue) and unstained, under a stereomicroscope. To assess survival of the bradyzoites, the irradiated meat samples were fed to 30 dogs. After 10 days, faecal samples were examined for sporocysts. Results: The results showed that the highest and lowest mortality rate of Sarcocystis bradyzoites in infected organs using electron beam at a dose of 2 kGy were 92.5% and 100%, respectively, and the lowest mortality rate at a dose of 0.5 kGy were 2.5% and 7.89%, respectively. Conclusion: The results of statistical analysis showed that the mortality rate of Sarcocystis bradyzoites was significant between different doses of gamma ray and electron beam, so that gamma rays were better compared to electron beam in destroying Sarcocystis bradyzoites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Fish is a great nutritious food and provides quality protein and a variety of vitamins and minerals. This contributes significantly to the economy and food security in Iran. However, there are safety concerns related to the presence of zoonotic parasites. Objectives: The objective of this study is, therefore, to review fish‐borne zoonotic parasites in Iran. Methods: Keywords such as fish‐borne, parasites, zoonotic, Iran, and some names of fish‐borne zoonotic parasites were searched in databases including PubMed, Science Direct, Elsevier, SID, Magiran, Irandoc, Google Scholar and the World Health Organization. Results: The most common fish‐borne parasites with zoonotic potential identified in reports in the literature were the protozoa Balantidium spp., Myxobolus spp. and Sarcosystis sp.; the trematodes Heterophyes heterophyes and Clinostomum complanatum; the cestodes Ligula intestinalis and Diphyllobothrium latum; the nematodes Pseudoterranova sp., Anisakis spp., Contracaecum spp., Raphidascaris spp., Eustrongylides spp. and Capillaria sp.; and the acanthocephal Corynosoma spp. Conclusions: The potential risk factors for the transmission of fish‐borne zoonotic parasites to humans are consumption of raw or undercooked infected fish, contact with contaminated water and contact with infected fish. There is a need for epidemiological surveillance of fish for parasites with zoonotic potential and of occurrence of infections in humans to better understand the public health significance and design prevention programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The expansion of vector-borne diseases is considered to be a threat to pet health. Some diseases such as heartworm disease have effective individual prevention methods; however, population-level disease control is limited by the lack of treatment compliance by pet owners. Veterinarians have a primary role in increasing compliance by educating owners on the appropriate prevention measures. Veterinary educational approaches targeting prevention strategies could strengthen prevention messaging at a clinic level. Methods: A knowledge and attitude study was conducted with incoming Ross University School of VeterinaryMedicine students as a preliminary assessment of this hypothesis. Results: Seventy-three students were interviewed using a tested and standardised questionnaire during their first weeks and 38 answered the same questionnaire one year later. All of the participants had previous experience in a veterinary clinical setting. Knowledge about the disease was variable, usually higher in former veterinary technicians. Unfortunately, knowledge of heartworm prevention was low. In addition, willingness to share knowledge on disease prevention did not change even after one year in veterinary school. Discussion: These results suggest that additions within the veterinary and veterinary technician school curriculummay be required to improve knowledge about disease prevention and ultimately promote better communication with pet owners and veterinary clinical teams. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]