1. The Debate over Open Communion in the Episcopal Church: Ecclesiastical Disobedience or Lawlessness?
- Author
-
James D Prendergast
- Subjects
Baptism ,biology ,Constitution ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Philosophy ,Religious studies ,biology.organism_classification ,Professional responsibility ,Obedience ,Civil disobedience ,Law ,Eucharist ,Bishops ,Lawlessness ,media_common - Abstract
Lawyers and priests are both vested in their office by a licensing authority and take oaths to obey the law, whether civil or ecclesiastical, that governs. Within these similar settings, the appropriate authority may need to judge disobedience by the lawyer or priest. If obedience is not enforced, respect for the law will decline and lawlessness ensues. In the Episcopal Church, it is black-letter law that only the baptised may receive communion. Notwithstanding the law, priests in ever-increasing numbers are inviting all to the table. Against what standard is such conduct to be judged? The Constitution and Canons are silent. Is the standard therefore to be merely the fact that the priest thinks he or she is following the dictates of the Holy Spirit? Or is there a real standard for judgment? Perhaps the gloss around civil disobedience and the rules of professional responsibility of lawyers may provide a more objective guide. This article discusses the debate over open table and the current black-letter law, and considers ecclesiastical disobedience under the guidance of the standards for legitimate civil disobedience. In addition, it considers the apparent desire of the bishops for the best of all possible worlds – having a law that the greater Church will appreciate, but then not enforcing it. The result may be more table fellowship but also anarchy.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF