Search

Simple Summary: Periorbital surgeries are painful procedures that require effective pain management, and regional anaesthesia is an essential tool used to achieve it. To desensitise the area of the head involved, blockade of the branches of the trigeminal nerve (ophthalmic, maxillary, and mandibular nerves) is warranted. This technique is well described and employed in human medicine, but the literature on veterinary medicine (dogs) is scarce. This study aims to assess and compare two ultrasound-guided approaches for trigeminal nerve block. Thirteen dog heads were utilised, and following a preliminary anatomical assessment, procedures were conducted using temporal and coronoid approaches. The needle was advanced under ultrasonographic guidance from the dorsal aspect of the temporal area or ventral to the zygomatic arch, respectively. A computed tomography scan was performed with the needles in place and repeated after injection of a contrast medium/tissue dye mixture. Dissection of the heads was immediately performed thereafter. Needle position, contrast distribution, and nerve staining were evaluated and compared between the two techniques. Results indicate no significant difference between both techniques. Both methods demonstrate adequate distribution, with minimal intracranial spread of the injectate. Both techniques are promising, although further studies in live animals are required. The trigeminal nerve is responsible for innervating the periorbita. Ultrasound-guided trigeminal block is employed in humans for trigeminal neuralgia or periorbital surgery. There are no studies evaluating this block in dogs. This study aims to evaluate and compare two approaches (coronoid and temporal) of the trigeminal nerve block. We hypothesised superior staining with the coronoid approach. Thirteen dog heads were used. After a preliminary anatomical study, two ultrasound-guided injections per head (right and left, coronoid and temporal approach, randomly assigned), with an injectate volume of 0.15 mL cm−1 of cranial length, were performed (iodinated contrast and tissue dye mixture). The ultrasound probe was placed over the temporal region, visualising the pterygopalatine fossa. For the temporal approach, the needle was advanced from the medial aspect of the temporal region in a dorsoventral direction. For the coronoid approach, it was advanced ventral to the zygomatic arch in a lateromedial direction. CT scans and dissections were conducted to assess and compare the position of the needle, the spread of the injectate, and nerve staining. No significant differences were found. Both approaches demonstrated the effective interfascial distribution of the injectate, with some minimal intracranial spread. Although the coronoid approach did not yield superior staining as hypothesised, it presents a viable alternative to the temporal approach. Studies in live animals are warranted to evaluate clinical efficacy and safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We designed a device to close accidental dural puncture via the offending puncturing epidural needle directly after diagnosis of the puncture and before removing the needle. The aim of this study was to quantify this device's ability to seal cerebrospinal fluid leakage.Methods: Forty-six anesthetized adult sheep were studied in a single-blind randomized controlled fashion in two equal groups.An intentional dural puncture was performed with an 18-gage Tuohy needle on all the sheep between L6 and S1 levels. Contrast medium was injected through the needle. Twenty-three animals receive treatment with the sealing device. Two minutes after device placement, or dural puncture in the control group, a CT scan was performed on the animals to estimate contrast material leakage. A region of interest (ROI) was defined as the region that enclosed the subarachnoid space, epidural space, and neuroforaminal canal (the vertebral body above and half of its equivalent height in sacrum below the puncture site). In this region, the total contrast volume and the volumes in the epidural space (EPIDURAL) were measured. The primary outcome measure was the EPIDURAL/ROI ratio to ascertain the proportion of intrathecally injected fluid that passed into the epidural space in both groups. The secondary outcomes were the total amount of contrast in the ROI and the EPIDURAL.Results: The device was deployed successfully in all but two instances, where it suffered from manufacturing defects.Leakage was less in the study group (1.0 vs 1.4 mL, p=0.008). The median EPIDURAL/ROI ratio was likewise less in the study group (29 vs 46; p=0.013; 95% CI (-27 to -3.5)).Conclusion: This novel dural puncture-sealing device, also envisaged to be used in other comparable iatrogenic leakage scenarios to be identified in the future, was able to reduce the volume of cerebrospinal fluid that leaked into the epidural space after dural puncture. The device is possibly a valuable way of preventing fluid leakage immediately after the recognition of membrane puncture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]